Intravitreal Injection Of Triamcinolone Acetonide Research Articles

MACULAR SENSITIVITY AND MORPHOLOGY AFTER INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE FOR MACULAR EDEMA WITH BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

To evaluate the changes of macular sensitivity, thickness, and total macular volume after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide to treat macular edema with branch retinal vein occlusion. Seventeen eyes of 17 patients with branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. Using capillary nonperfusion on fluorescein angiography, patients were classified into nonischemic or ischemic groups. Microperimetry was used to measure macular sensitivity within the central 4°, 10°, and 20° fields. Macular thickness and macular volume within these fields were measured by optical coherence tomography. The mean macular thickness within the central 4°, 10°, and 20° fields decreased significantly after intravitreal therapy (all Ps < 0.001) as did total macular volume (all Ps < 0.001). Visual acuity was significantly better at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.002) as was the mean macular sensitivity within the three fields (all Ps < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the trend profile of macular thickness and volume within the three fields between the ischemic and nonischemic groups. There were also no significant differences in the trend profile of visual acuity and macular sensitivity. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may improve macular sensitivity and morphology in patients with ischemic and nonischemic branch retinal vein occlusion.

Assessment of the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on the chorioretinal and vitreous inflammatory reaction to cryotherapy in rabbits

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a resposta inflamatória em coróide, retina e vítreo nos olhos de coelhos submetidos à crioterapia seguida de injeção intravítrea de triancinolona acetonida e comparar com os olhos de coelhos que foram submetidos à crioterapia seguida de injeção intravítrea de solução salina. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de um estudo prospectivo caso-controle. Foram realizados procedimentos cirúrgicos em 11 coelhos albinos, sendo excluídos os animais que não completaram o pós-operatório ou apresentaram complicações intra ou pós-operatórias. Todos os coelhos foram submetidos à peritomia [...]

Therapeutic Effect of Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone in the Treatment of Endothelial Graft Rejection

To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection in the treatment of endothelial graft rejection and the expression of T-helper type 1 (Th-1) chemokines in the aqueous humor. Eleven patients (11 eyes) with acute endothelial graft rejection underwent IVTA (4 mg/0.1 mL) injection in addition to conventional treatment, including systemic and topical steroids and cyclosporine A (group A); 13 patients (13 eyes) received conventional treatment only (group B). Clinical characteristics were analyzed. In group A, Th-1 chemokines (CXCL-9, -10, and -11) in aqueous humor were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and CXCR3(+) cells were counted by flow cytometry before treatment and at the period of improvement. There were no significant differences in visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and recurrence rate between the 2 groups. The mean time to improvement was 9.1 ± 3.9 days in group A and 15.4 ± 5.5 days in group B (P = 0.04). The concentrations of CXCL-9, -10, and -11 were 562.7 ± 109.4, 30293.1 ± 12537.1, and 228.3 ± 80.8 pg/mL before treatment and 6.7 ± 6.8 (P < 0.01), 207.5 ± 209.8 (P < 0.01), and 18.9 ± 19.5 (P < 0.01) pg/mL after treatment, respectively. The CXCL-10 level correlated with the time to improvement of graft rejection (P = 0.02). Flow cytometry demonstrated a significantly decreased number of CXCR3(+) and CXCR3(+)CD4(+) cells in the aqueous humor after treatment. IVTA injection was effective in reducing the time to improvement of endothelial graft rejection. Increased expression of CXCL-9, -10, and -11, and their receptors in the aqueous humor of patients with endothelial graft rejection decreased after treatment.

Acute idiopathic frosted branch angiitis in an 11-month-old infant treated with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide

An 11-month-old boy presented with bilateral vision loss following upper respiratory tract infection. Extensive perivascular sheathing resembling frosted branch angiitis and severe macular edema was noted in both eyes. All tests for etiological diagnosis were negative. Treatment with systemic corticosteroids and antibiotics caused resolution of perivascular infiltrates. Macular edema resolved with improvement in visual acuity following consecutive bilateral intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections. To our knowledge, this is the youngest reported case of frosted branch angiitis.

One-year results of bevacizumab intravitreal and posterior sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide with reduced laser fluence photodynamic therapy for retinal angiomatous proliferation

Our aim was to study the efficacy of combined triple therapy with intravitreal bevacizumab injections (IVB), posterior sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA), and reduced laser fluence photodynamic therapy (RFPDT) in Japanese patients with retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). This was a retrospective, observational, consecutive case series. Fifteen consecutive RAP treatment-naïve eyes were treated with triple therapy of IVB, STTA, and RFPDT (25 J/cm(2) of laser fluence). Whenever there was a recurrence of retinal-retinal anastomosis (RRA) or retinal-choroidal anastomosis (RCA) and marked leakage from subretinal neovascularization, the triple therapy was reapplied. When there were only intraretinal exudative and/or hemorrhagic changes without distinct RRA or RCA, IVB alone was applied. The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline improved significantly (from 0.489 to 0.294 12 months) (paired t test, p = 0.043). LogMAR BCVA at 12 months was stable or improved by ≥ 0.2 in 14 eyes (93.3 %). Mean number of triple therapy instituted during the 12-month study period was 1.2, and mean number of IVB treatments was 1.4. Combined IVB, STTA, and RFPDT for RAP was effective in maintaining or improving VA at 1 year. In addition, the number of treatments could be markedly reduced.

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Versus Intravitreal Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Exudative Retinal Detachment Secondary to Posterior Uveal Melanoma

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prompt intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection (4 mg/0.1 mL) vs intravitreal bevacizumab injection (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) compared with observation in the management of extensive exudative retinal detachment secondary to posterior uveal melanoma. Retrospective, nonrandomized, interventional case series. setting: Institutional. patients: Ninety-six patients affected by posterior uveal melanoma with large exudative retinal detachment (>10 mm in largest basal diameter) were included. intervention: Patients received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (32 eyes) or intravitreal bevacizumab (32 eyes) at plaque removal. Thirty-two patients served as controls (observation group). All groups were matched for age, sex, initial tumor thickness and largest basal diameter, largest exudative retinal detachment basal diameter, tumor location, and Bruch membrane rupture. Patients underwent monthly follow-up examinations in the first 6 months and every 3 months thereafter. Follow-up was longer than 24 months. main outcome measure: Exudative retinal detachment resolution (B-scan ultrasonography), steroid-induced cataract, steroid-induced increased IOP. Follow-up was 37 ± 7 months. Marked exudative retinal detachment regression was documented in 22 (69%) intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide-treated vs 11 (34%) intravitreal bevacizumab-treated and 9 (28%) untreated eyes (P = .0007 and P = .0001, respectively). No statistical significance was found between intravitreal bevacizumab group vs observation group (P = .45) Steroid-induced cataract was observed in 4 intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide-treated patients (12%). Neither steroid-induced increased IOP nor other short- or long-term side effects were documented. Intraoperative intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection induces earlier and marked exudative retinal detachment resolution after brachytherapy of posterior uveal melanoma. Risk and benefit should be balanced vs steroid-induced cataract.

Triamcinolone Acetonide as an Adjuvant to Membrane Peeling Surgery: A Pilot Study

To evaluate the clinical outcome and complications of intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide as adjuvant to reduce postoperative macular edema in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes. This retrospective comparative study included 22 patients (22 eyes) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling for the treatment of idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Fifteen eyes (15 patients) received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg (0.1 cc) of triamcinolone acetonide at the end of surgery, and no injection was performed for 7 eyes (7 patients). Main outcome measures were visual acuity and intraocular pressure. Minimum follow-up was 3 months. Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients were included in the study. The follow-up ranged from 3 to 12 months. Visual acuity improved in both groups at 3 months: logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution -0.26 ± 0.19 in the triamcinolone acetonide group (P = .001) and -0.26 ± 0.13 in the control group (P = .002). However, there was no statistically significant difference in visual acuity improvement 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively in the triamcinolone acetonide group compared with the control group (P = .79, = .94, and = .21, respectively). There was no significant difference in intraocular pressure change between the two groups during the follow-up period (P > .05). The current pilot study suggests that postoperative intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide does not lead to better visual outcomes in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of idiopathic epiretinal membranes.

IVTA as Adjunctive Treatment to PRP and MPC for PDR and Macular Edema: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundTo quantify the effect of a combination treatment of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection, panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), and macular photocoagulation (MPC) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic macular edema (DME).Methodology/Principal FindingsWe conducted a meta-analysis and searched for reports concerning IVTA injection combined with PRP for the treatment of PDR and DME using Medline, EMbase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google according to Cochrane evaluation guidelines. The quality of the reports was evaluated using the Jadad score. Only four studies were ultimately included in this meta-analysis and the fixed-effects model was used. Treatment with IVTA injection combined with PRP and MPC significantly improved BCVA (p<0.001) from one to six months, compared with PRP and MPC alone. There was a statistically significant mean difference in central macular thickness (CMT), at the one-month follow-up (p<0.001). No evidence of publication bias was present. There was a low level of heterogeneity in this group of studies.Conclusions/SignificanceThis meta-analysis indicates that IVTA injection combined with PRP and MPC results in an improvement of BCVA, and CMT reduction in patients with PDR and DME.

Different dosages of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

To study the effect of intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for the treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in a sample of Chinese patients from Shaanxi province. The 50 eyes from 50 patients were separated into three TA treatment groups: 17 patients were given 4mg /0.1ml, 19 patients were given 8mg /0.2ml, and 14 patients were given 16mg /0.4ml. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Foveal thickness, intraocular pressure (IOP), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured. Macular edema responded well both anatomically and functionally to the TA injections. After the initial intravitreal injection, macular edema recurred at 2-4 months in the low-dose group (4 mg), at 3-5 months in the medium-dose group (8 mg), and at 6-9 months in the high-dose group (16 mg). No significant difference in BCVA or in foveal thickness were observed between the first intravitreal injection and the re-injection. There was no increase in IOP after re-injection of 16mg TA, if the patient did not have an elevated IOP after the initial intravitreal injection of 4/8 mg TA. A low dosage of TA(4 mg) administered via intravitreal injection might be useful as an initial treatment for macular edema secondary to CRVO. A higher dosage of TA (16mg) can be used if there is no IOP elevation with the initial TA injection.

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection versus 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for the treatment of chronic pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CME) after uncomplicated cataract surgery.Methods: This retrospective, comparative, consecutive case series study included 39 patients with chronic pseudophakic CME. Twenty eyes in 20 patients were treated with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection (IVT group), and 19 eyes in 19 patients were treated with pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling (PPV group). In both groups, complete ophthalmologic examinations were performed before and after procedures. Findings were compared between the groups.Results: Both groups experienced a significant improvement in visual acuity and macular thickness after 12 months follow-up. At months 1 and 2, the IVT group showed a significant improvement in visual acuity and a significant reduction in macular thickness compared with the PPV group (p < 0.05), but these differences were not statistically significant between the groups after the 12-month period.Conclusion: Both intravitreal steroid injection and pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling had a favorable effect on visual and anatomic results in patients with chronic pseudophakic CME. However, surgical treatment had no advantage over intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection after 12-months follow-up.

Two-year outcome of photodynamic therapy combined with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

To compare the 2-year results after photodynamic therapy (PDT) alone and PDT combined with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide (triple therapy) for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 consecutive patients (40 eyes) with subfoveal PCV. Of these 40 eyes, 16 were treated with PDT alone and 24 were treated with triple therapy. The change in visual acuity in the triple therapy group was significantly better than that in the PDT group (P < 0.001). At 24 months, improvement in visual acuity was seen in only two eyes (12.5 %) of the PDT group, while it was seen in ten eyes (41.7 %) of the triple therapy group. Retreatment was given to 12 eyes (75.0 %) in the PDT group and to nine eyes (37.5 %) in the triple therapy group, although the retreatment-free period was significantly longer in the triple therapy group than in the PDT group (P < 0.001). Post-treatment vitreous hemorrhage was seen in only two eyes (12.5 %), all of which were in the PDT group. Compared with PDT alone, triple therapy appears to reduce the postoperative hemorrhagic complications and recurrences of PCV and to improve the 2-year visual outcomes of PCV.

Intérêt du bevacizumab dans le traitement des occlusions de la veine centrale de la rétine après échec de la triamcinolone

To evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab injection used secondarily in patients with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion after failure of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. The present study represents a retrospective review of eight patients presenting with central retinal vein occlusion complicated by macular edema with central foveolar thickness greater than 350 μm by Cirrus-OCT, Zeiss. Between 4 and 6 months after the central vein occlusion, all patients initially underwent intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection (4 mg/0.1 ml). In the case of functional or anatomic failure, three monthly bevacizumab injections (1.25mg/0.05 ml) were administered. Prior to each injection, an ophthalmic examination was performed, documenting visual acuity (ETDRS), biomicroscopy, IOP and central foveolar thickness (OCT 3). After three intravitreal bevacizumab injections, we found no improvement in visual acuity (M0 = 45.56 ± 13 letters; M3 = 44.2 ± 8.6 letters), and no decrease in macular thickness (M0 = 559 μm ± 193; M3 = 543 μm ± 263). No intraocular pressure spikes or endophthalmitis were observed. The lack of anatomic and functional efficacy observed in our study does not appear to be related to the method, dosage or timing of injection, nor to the presence of subretinal macroaneurysms. It may be due to a cross-resistance to these two drugs. In any event, recent approval of ranibizumab and intraocular dexamethasone implants will likely change our therapeutic approach. In case of recalcitrant macular edema secondary to central vein occlusion after failed intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection, secondary intravitreal bevacizumab does not appear beneficial.

Comparison of the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for cystoid macular edema with versus without serous retinal detachment in branch retinal vein occlusion: influence on macular sensitivity and morphology

BackgroundThe influence of serous retinal detachment (SRD) on visual acuity, macular sensitivity, and macular thickness is unclear after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for macular edema with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).MethodsTwenty-one eyes of 21 BRVO patients with macular edema received IVTA. Patients were divided into two groups by optical coherence tomography findings: 11 patients who had cystoid macular edema (CME) with SRD (SRD (+) group) and 10 patients who had CME without SRD (SRD (−) group). Microperimetry was performed with a Micro Perimeter 1 before and at 3 and 6 months after IVTA. Macular thickness was measured by optical coherence tomography. We exchanged the superior and inferior regions to separate the regions into those with and without occlusion. As a result, the superior region was always the occluded region and the inferior region was non-occluded.ResultsIn both the SRD (−) group and the SRD (+) group, the mean macular thickness within the central 4° field and the 10° and 20° fields of the occluded region decreased significantly from baseline to 3 and 6 months after IVTA (all P <0.01). Visual acuity also improved significantly in both groups from baseline to 3 and 6 months after IVTA (both P <0.05). In both groups, the mean macular sensitivity (measured with by microperimetry) within the central 4° field and the 10° and 20° fields of the occluded region showed a significant increase from baseline to 3 and 6 months after IVTA (all P <0.05). The trend profiles of macular thickness within the 10° and 20° fields of the occluded region showed significant differences, but there were no significant differences with respect to the trend profiles of visual acuity and macular sensitivity within the central 4° field and the 10° and 20° fields of the occluded region.ConclusionsThese results suggest that IVTA may achieve more marked improvement of macular morphology in BRVO patients with SRD than in those without SRD, while this therapy may have a similar effect on macular function in BRVO patients with or without SRD.

Associated factors and treatment outcome of presumed noninfectious endophthalmitis occurring after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

To investigate the associated factors and treatment outcomes in patients with presumed noninfectious endophthalmitis after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection. Among 219 consecutive cases of 186 patients who had undergone IVTA injection for macular diseases, presumed noninfectious endophthalmitis was diagnosed if the patient showed severe inflammation in the anterior chamber and vitreous cavity within 7 days after injection but no organism was isolated on microbiological examination. Clinical features and previously performed surgical procedures were evaluated to assess their association with presumed noninfectious endophthalmitis using logistic regression. After surgical or medical treatment for endophthalmitis, the visual outcome was evaluated in all patients. Noninfectious endophthalmitis developed in six of 219 eyes (2.7 %). Previous vitrectomy, history of IVTA injection, and pseudophakia were significantly associated with the occurrence of presumed noninfectious endophthalmitis after IVTA injection (p = 0.049, 0.034, and 0.009, respectively). Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during vitrectomy also showed statistically significant association (odds ratio = 13.6, p = 0.017). Five of six patients (83.3 %) regained pre-injection vision. In addition to previous vitrectomy, history of IVTA injection, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, and pseudophakia may render the eye vulnerable to presumed noninfectious endophthalmitis following IVTA injection. Visual outcome shows generally good prognosis after treatment.

Intravitreal Versus Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal (IV) triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) versus subtenon (ST) triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) injection for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).Methods: Searches for randomized clinical trials published between 1 January 1950 and 15 March 2011 were conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library included in the present meta-analysis are five randomized controlled trials, each with a minimum follow-up of 3 mo. All included studies evaluated the efficacy of TA for the treatment of refractory DME, and compared IVTA with STTA by measuring visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP).Results: One mo post-injection, treatment with IVTA had significantly improved VA (MD, −0.14 logMAR; 95% CI = −0.16 to −0.13) and reduced CMT (MD = −174.02 μm; 95% CI = −249.97 to −98.08) compared with STTA. At 3 mo post-injection, treatment with IVTA had significantly improved VA (MD = −0.07 logMAR; 95% CI = −0.09 to −0.05) and reduced CMT (MD = −119.46 μm; 95% CI = −176.55 to −62.36) compared with STTA. The benefits of either treatment were no longer significant at 6 mo, and patients had to be retreated. Compared with STTA, IVTA injections produced no difference in IOPs at 1 mo, higher IOPs at 3 mo, and lower IOP values at 6 monthsConclusions: Within 3 mo, IVTA is more effective than is STTA in improving VA and reducing CMT in patients with refractory DME. However, the benefits of either regimen were no longer evident at 6 mo.

EFFICACY OF INTRAVITREAL TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

This study aimed to report the clinical outcome of intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). The study enrolled 20 eyes of 19 patients with persistent diabetic macular edema. Full ocular examination including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), tonometry, retinal examination with +90D lens and average foveal retinal thickness using an optical coherence tomography (OCT) were monitored before and then weekly for up to four weeks after the injection. All eyes received intravitreal triamcinolone acetinide (IVTA) (4 mg/0.1 ml) under topical anesthesia with Proparacaine 0.5% eye drops. BCVA at one week improved by two lines or more in six eyes (30%) and in nine eyes (45%) at four weeks. However, no significant improvement in mean BCVA from baseline was observed at one week (p>0.05) and four weeks (p>0.05). Mean retinal thickness (RT) were 411±179µm at baseline, 349±102µm at one week after the injection (p0.05), and 380±159µm at four weeks (p>0.05). One week after the injection, significant regression of macular edema was seen. However recurrence occurred at four weeks. No significant complications such as visual loss, endophthalmitis, significant raise in intraocular pressure or systemic complications developed. In conclusion, no significant changes in BCVA, IOP and RT were observed in the short-term observation after the IVTA. These findings need a larger sample size and a longer term observation to monitor the potential systemic and ocular side effects in Iraqi patients.

Incidence and risk factors for secondary ocular hypertension after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection in Asian Indian eyes

Incidence and risk factors for secondary ocular hypertension after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection in Asian Indian eyes

Comparison of intravitreal triamcinolone treatment and intravitreal triamcinolone with grid laser treatment in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema.

To compare the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) and IVTA plus macular laser grid photocoagulation therapy in diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME). Sixteen patients affected by diffuse DME were retrospectively evaulated. Patients were divided into two groups: control group (IVTA injection) and laser group (IVTA plus grid laser). Main outcomes were best corrected visual aquity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at the 3(rd) and 6(th) months of treatment. IVTA associated complications and reinjection necessity were assessed. Our study comprised 18 eyes of 16 patients. The baseline BCVA and CMT were 0.93±0.45 and 530±136μm for the control and 1.02±0.52 and 509±177μm for the laser group respectively. Posttreatment BCVA at the 3(rd) and 6(th) month were 0.73±0.4 and 0.75±0.45 for control and 0.98±0.44 and 1.04±0.4 for laser group respectively (p>0.05 for all). CMT values at the 3(rd) and 6(th) months were 260±174μm (p=0.008) and 362±163 μm (p=0.05) for control and 331±161μm (p=0.05) and 388±215 μm (p>0.05) for laser groups. 55% of control and 66% of laser groups needed reinjection with an avarage of 7±4 months after the first injection. 22% cataract progression and 33% intraocular pressure elevation were noted. Macular grid laser photocoagulation after IVTA does not have beneficial effects for diffuse DME.

This issue of Acta, printed and electronic

This issue of Acta, printed and electronic

Corticosteroid Use for Diabetic Macular Edema: Old Fad or New Trend?

Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in working age individuals in developed countries. Most cases of diabetes related vision loss result from breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier with resultant diabetic macular edema (DME). For over 30 years, laser photocoagulation has been the standard therapy for DME, but most eyes do not experience significant improvements in visual acuity. Intravitreal injections of drugs that inhibit the action of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) lead to gains in vision, but can be expensive and need to be repeated frequently. In addition to VEGF-mediated breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier, recent evidence suggests that inflammation plays an important role in the development of DME. Recognizing this, physicians have injected steroids into the vitreous and developers have created sustained release implants. Intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide lead to rapid resolution of macular edema and significant short-term improvements in visual acuity, but unfortunately, visual acuities diminish when treatment is continued through 2 years. However, intravitreal triamcinolone remains an attractive treatment option for eyes that are pseudophakic, scheduled to undergo cataract surgery, resistant to laser photocoagulation, or require urgent panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative retinopathy. In controlled trials, intraocular implants that slowly release dexamethasone and fluocinolone show promise in reducing macular edema and improving visual acuity. The high incidences of drug related cataracts and glaucoma, however, require that corticosteroids be used cautiously and that patients be selected carefully. The increasing number of patients with DME, the burgeoning cost of medical care and the continuing development of intravitreal steroids suggest that the use of these agents will likely increase in coming years.