Intravitreal Injections In Patients Research Articles

Changes in Macular Pigment Optical Density after Intravitreal Faricimab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Pilot Study.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of faricimab intravitreal injections in patients with exudative age macular degeneration (nAMD) after the loading dose using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and macular pigment optical density (MPOD). Methods: In this observational prospective study, we enlisted a total of 12 consecutive eyes of 12 patients (six females, six males; mean age 70.47 ± 2.46 years) affected by nAMD who consecutively presented to the Eye Clinic of the University of Naples "Federico II" and Monaldi Hospital of Naples, from June 2023 to December 2023. All patients received four once-monthly intravitreal injections of faricimab (6 mg/0.05 mL) (loading phase). At baseline and 1 month after the fourth faricimab monthly injection, all patients underwent assessment of best correct visual acuity (BCVA) and ophthalmic examination, including slit-lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure (IOP), fundus biomicroscopy, SD-OCT, and MPOD. Results: A total of 12 eyes of 12 patients (six women, six men; mean age 70.47 ± 2.46 years) were included in this study. A statistically significant raise in BCVA and MOPD parameters was shown between baseline and after the loading phase (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intravitreal injections of faricimab led in the short term to a significant functional and MPOD improvement along with a decrease in central macular thickness (CMT) and thus appears to be an effective treatment option without relevant adverse effects. MOPD may be considered as a prognostic factor associated with a good visual prognosis after intravitreal injections treatment.

Photocoagulation or sham laser in addition to conventional anti-VEGF therapy in macular edema associated with TelCaps due to diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion (TalaDME): a study protocol for a multicentric, French, two-group, non-commercial, active-control, observer-masked, non-inferiority, randomized controlled clinical trial

BackgroundMacular edema (ME) results from hyperpermeability of retinal vessels, leading to chronic extravasation of plasma components into the retina and hence potentially severe visual acuity loss. Current standard of care consists in using intravitreal injections (IVI), which results in a significant medical and economic burden. During diabetic retinopathy (DR) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO), it has recently been shown that focal vascular anomalies (capillary macro-aneurysms, also termed TelCaps) for telangiectatic capillaries may play a central role in the onset, early recurrence, and/or persistence of ME. Since targeted photocoagulation of TelCaps may improve vision, identification, and photocoagulation of TelCaps, it may represent a way to improve management of ME.ObjectiveThe Targeted Laser in (Diabetic) Macular Edema (TalaDME) study aims to evaluate whether ICG-guided targeted laser (IGTL), in association with standard of care by IVI, allows reducing the number of injections during the first year of treatment compared with IVI only, while remaining non-inferior for visual acuity.MethodsTalaDME is a French, multicentric, two-arms, randomized, sham laser-controlled, double-masked trial evaluating the effect of photocoagulation of TelCaps combined to IVI in patients with ME associated with TelCaps. Patients with vision loss related to center involved ME secondary to RVO or DR and presenting TelCaps are eligible. Two hundred and seventy eyes of 270 patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to standard care, i.e., IVI of anti-VEGF solely (control group) or combined with IGTL therapy (experimental group). Stratification is done on the cause of ME (i.e., RVO versus diabetes). Anti-VEGF IVI are administered to both groups monthly for 3 months (loading dose) and then with a pro re nata regimen with a monthly follow-up for 12 months. The primary endpoint will be the number of IVI and the change in visual acuity from baseline to 12 months. Secondary endpoints will be the changes in central macular thickness, impact on quality of life, cost of treatment, and incremental cost-utility ratio in each groups.Key safetyRare but severe AE linked to the use of IVI and laser, and previously described, are expected. In the sham group, rescue laser photocoagulation may be administered by the unmasked investigator if deemed necessary at month 3.DiscussionThe best management of ME associated with TelCaps is debated, and there have been no randomized study designed to answer this question. Given the fact that TelCaps may affect 30 to 60% of patients with chronic ME due to DR or RVO, a large number of patients could benefit from a specific management of TelCaps. TalaDME aims to establish the clinical and medico-economic benefits of additional targeted laser. The results of TalaDME may raise new recommendations for managing ME and impact healthcare costs.Trial registrationEudraCT: 2018-A00800-55/ NCT03751501. Registration date: Nov. 23, 2018.

Association between the response of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injection and systemic factors of diabetic macular edema

BackgroundThis study investigated the effects of systemic factors in response to intravitreal injections in patients with macular edema due to non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated with intravitreal injections for macular edema secondary to NPDR between January 2018 and January 2021. The patients were divided into three groups according to the injection response. When patients with diabetic macular edema showed 20µ or more reduction in central retinal thickness compared to baseline, they were classified as responsive group, and if not, they were classified as refractory group. The responsive group was further divided into the complete and incomplete response groups. Patients with complete disappearance of edema at seven months were classified as the complete response group, whereas those in which edema did not disappear were classified as the incomplete response group. The clinical characteristics of each group, including medical history, ophthalmic examination results, and laboratory examination results at the time of diagnosis, were analyzed.ResultsOf the 112 eyes (91 patients) that satisfied the inclusion criteria, 89 (77 patients) in the responsive group and 23 (14 patients) in the refractory group were included in the analysis. The responsive group was further divided into the complete (51 eyes) and incomplete (38 eyes) response groups. The refractory group had significantly higher glycated hemoglobin levels and significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rates than the responsive group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.012, respectively). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, both factors were found to be significant in predicting the degree of response (all p < 0.05). No factor showed a significant difference between the incomplete and complete response groups(all p > 0.05).ConclusionsIn macular edema caused by NPDR, low glomerular filtration rates and high glycated hemoglobin levels may be used as predictors of poor response to intravitreal injection therapy. In addition to blood glucose control, education should be provided regarding the need for the continuous monitoring of renal function.

A TRP to Pathological Angiogenesis and Vascular Normalization.

Uncontrolled angiogenesis underlies various pathological conditions such as cancer, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Hence, targeting pathological angiogenesis has become a promising strategy for the treatment of cancer and neovascular ocular diseases. However, current pharmacological treatments that target VEGF signaling have met with limited success either due to acquiring resistance against anti-VEGF therapies with serious side effects including nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular-related adverse effects in cancer patients or retinal vasculitis and intraocular inflammation after intravitreal injection in patients with AMD or PDR. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel strategies which can control multiple aspects of the pathological microenvironment and regulate the process of abnormal angiogenesis. To this end, vascular normalization has been proposed as an alternative for antiangiogenesis approach; however, these strategies still focus on targeting VEGF or FGF or PDGF which has shown adverse effects. In addition to these growth factors, calcium has been recently implicated as an important modulator of tumor angiogenesis. This article provides an overview on the role of major calcium channels in endothelium, TRP channels, with a special focus on TRPV4 and its downstream signaling pathways in the regulation of pathological angiogenesis and vascular normalization. We also highlight recent findings on the modulation of TRPV4 activity and endothelial phenotypic transformation by tumor microenvironment through Rho/YAP/VEGFR2 mechanotranscriptional pathways. Finally, we provide perspective on endothelial TRPV4 as a novel VEGF alternative therapeutic target for vascular normalization and improved therapy. © 2024 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 14:5389-5406, 2024.

Efficacy of anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy with subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in the management of diabetic macular oedema (DMO): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intravitreal injection anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (IVI anti-VEGF) therapy serves as the primary treatment for centre involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Conventional laser therapy (CLT) adjunct has proven beneficial; however, it is not widely used due to significant risks of retinal scarring. Subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy has, however, emerged as a comparable alternative to combination therapy, offering a distinct advantage by mitigating the risk of retinal scarring. A search of six databases was conducted. A meta-analysis of mean differences was performed including subgroup analyses where appropriate. Primary outcome was the number of injections at 12-14months; secondary outcomes were changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6-8months and 12-14months. A total of ten papers including six randomised clinical trials and four retrospective clinical studies were included in our study, capturing 563 eyes of 478 patients. Overall, the risk of bias was moderate for these studies. Significantly fewer anti-VEGF therapy injections were administered in the combination therapy versus anti-VEGF monotherapy patients at 12-14months who had poor visual acuity (6/18 Snellen or worse) at baseline, mean difference - 2.25 (95% CI; - 3.35, - 1.15; p < 0.05). Combination therapy was not associated with significantly fewer intravitreal injections in patients with a higher visual acuity (6/15 Snellen or better) at baseline. Our analysis also showed significant improvements to both BCVA and CMT were reached at 6 - 8month post-baseline at the 95% confidence intervals: - 1.13 (- 2.09, - 0.16) and - 4.04 (- 7.59, - 0.50). These improvements remained statistically significant at 12-14months: - 0.94 (- 1.67, - 0.20) and - 1.92 (- 3.52, - 0.32) respectively with combination therapy. Our findings demonstrate that combination therapy (SML + IVI anti-VEGF) is associated with fewer intravitreal injections. We report a better BCVA and a reduction in CMT at 6 and 12months from baseline with combination treatment compared to the IVI anti-VEGF monotherapy comparator. SML is a proven non-scarring cost-effective therapy for DMO that should be readily available in the medical retinal therapy as it may reduce the burden of care.

Assessment of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Using Optical Coherence Tomography Before and After Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injection in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

Assessment of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Using Optical Coherence Tomography Before and After Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injection in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

Clinical Features Associated with Acute Elevated Intraocular Pressure After Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.

To study the effects of intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) agents on intraocular pressure (IOP) and find associations with acute pressure spikes. This was a three-month, prospective study of patients receiving outpatient IVI of anti-VEGF agents for diabetic retinopathy (DR), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) at the Acuity Eye Group Medical Centers. IOP was measured pre- and post-injection at 10-minute intervals up to 50 minutes after injection with a handheld tonometer. Patients with an IOP greater than 35 mmHg at 30 minutes received an anterior chamber paracentesis (ACP), while patients below 35 mmHg were monitored without intervention. A total of 617 patients (51% female, 49% male) received IVI for DR (n = 199), AMD (n = 355), and RVO (n = 63). ACP was performed in 17 patients. Average pre-injection IOP was 16 ± 4 compared to 24 ± 7 mmHg for the non-ACP vs ACP group, respectively (mean ± standard deviation), p < 0.0001. IOP returned to baseline in 98% of patients at 50 minutes. A diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucoma suspect was more prevalent in the ACP group compared to the non-ACP group, 82.3% vs 14.2% and 17.6% vs 9.0%, respectively, p < 0.0001 and p > 0.05. Patients with a pre-injection IOP >25 mmHg and a history of glaucoma had a 58.3% rate of ACP. A 31-gauge needle had a higher mean increase in IOP from baseline compared to 30-gauge needle, p < 0.0001. IOP spikes are most significant in the first 10 minutes after IVI but typically resolve within the first hour. However, utilizing a smaller 31-gauge IVI in patients with a glaucoma history and pre-injection IOP >25 mmHg may be associated with significant IOP spikes lasting longer than 30 minutes.

Quantified anastomotic areas of neovascularization as factors associated with frequent recurrence in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

To investigate the quantitative characteristics of anastomoses of macular neovascularization (MNV) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) according to the frequency of intravitreal injections (IVIs). Eighty-six eyes of 86 patients treated for nAMD were classified into two groups based on the number of IVIs administered over 12 months: stable (<3) and unstable (≥3). Anastomotic areas were defined as areas surrounded by neighboring vessels in the MNV; their total number, mean area, maximal and minimal diameters (i.e., maximal and minimum Feret diameters), and ratio (Feret aspect ratio [AR]) were analyzed in the inner and outer areas of the MNV. Forty-four and 42 eyes were classified into the stable and unstable groups, respectively. The eyes in the unstable group had larger anastomotic areas with longer minimum Feret diameters and higher perimeters in the outer MNV. In the logistic regression analysis, instability was associated with a larger anastomotic area and a larger minimum Feret diameter in the outer MNV. Multivariate analysis revealed that a larger minimum Feret diameter in the outer MNV was the most significant factor (P=0.03). The quantitative characteristics of the anastomotic areas in the MNV might indicate the need for IVIs in nAMD patients.

The Association of Intravitreal Injections of Different Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor with Systemic Outcomes in Diabetic Patients.

This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the systemic effects of three commonly available anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injections in patients with diabetes, using data taken from a multi-institutional database in Taiwan. Patient data were sourced from the multi-institutional Chang Gung Research Database. Participants were divided into groups based on treatment with bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept. Baseline characteristics were matched among the groups by the inverse probability of treatment weighting. The incidence rate of outcome events was calculated as the number of events divided by 100 person-years of follow-up. The cumulative incidence function was used to estimate the incidence rate of the outcome events among groups. The incidence of ischemic stroke was higher in the ranibizumab group than the bevacizumab and aflibercept groups (1.65, 0.92, and 0.61 per 100 person-years, respectively). The incidence of major adverse lower-limb events was higher in the bevacizumab group (2.95), followed by ranibizumab (2.00) and aflibercept (0.74). Major bleeding was relatively higher in bevacizumab (12.1) compared to ranibizumab (4.3) and aflibercept (3.8). All-cause death was higher for both bevacizumab (3.26) and aflibercept (2.61) when compared to ranibizumab (0.55), and all-cause admission was found to be highest with bevacizumab (58.6), followed by aflibercept (30.2), and ranibizumab (27.6). The bevacizumab group demonstrated a greater decrease in glycated hemoglobin compared to the baseline level (-0.33%). However, a few differences in the clinical condition between the groups were still observed after matching. In conclusion, this study suggests that different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents may be associated with various and differing systemic adverse events. The differences might also be attributed to differences in patient characteristics and clinical status.

Benefit of intravitreal injections in patients with sub-threshold baseline visual acuity: a retrospective single-centre study

PurposeTo investigate the lower visual acuity threshold for recommending intravitreal injection therapy (IVI). The lower limit of 1.3 logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was adopted in 2006 and has been maintained since then.MethodsIn this retrospective study, data from patients with a logMAR BCVA ≤ 1.3 and 24 months follow-up were analysed. We included patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DME), or retinal vein occlusion (RVO).ResultsThe data from 164 patients (nAMD: 107; DME: 15; RVO: 42) were analysed. We observed a significant improvement at all time intervals (0 to 6, 6 to 12, 12 to 18, and 18 to 24 months after initiating IVI) compared to baseline. Across all indications, median BCVA improved from 1.4 to 1.0 within the first 6 months and remained stable within 24 months. Patients received a median of 5 and 10 injections within 6 and 24 months, respectively. Median foveal retinal thickness was 594.5 μm at baseline and dropped to 244.5 μm, 235.5 µm, 183 µm, and 180 µm during the four consecutive time intervals.ConclusionPatients with nAMD, DME, and RVO with poor baseline BCVA may also benefit from intravitreal therapy with VEGF-inhibitors. In the present study, we observed functional and morphological improvement over 2 years irrespective of the underlying macular disease. Those patients should not be excluded from therapy.

Focal Photocoagulation as an Adjunctive Therapy to Reduce the Burden of Intravitreal Injections in Macula Edema Patients, the LyoMAC2 Study

To assess the efficacy of focal photocoagulation of capillary macroaneurysms (CMA) to reduce the burden of intravitreal injections (IVI) in patients with macular edema (ME). Retrospective multicenter study in patients with diabetic ME or ME secondary to retinal vein occlusion (ME-RVO). CMA associated with ME were selectively photocoagulated. Patients were followed for one year after photocoagulation. 93 eyes of 76 patients were included in this study. At 6 months after the laser (n = 93), there was a significant decrease in mean macular thickness (from 354 µm to 314 µm, p < 0.001) and in mean IVI number (from 2.52 to 1.52 at 6 months, p < 0.001). The mean BCVA remained stable (0.32 and 0.31 logMAR at baseline and 6 months, p = 0.95). At 12 months (n = 81/93), there was a significant decrease in mean macular thickness (from 354 µm to 314 µm, p < 0.001) and in mean IVI number (from 4.44 to 2.95 at 12 months, p < 0.001), while the mean BCVA remained stable (0.32 and 0.30 logMAR at baseline and 12 months, p = 0.16). Focal laser photocoagulation of CMA seems to be effective and safe for reducing the burden of IVI in patients with ME. Their screening during the follow-up should be considered closely.

Current and Emerging Therapies for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is the most common primary mitochondrial DNA disorder, presenting typically as a sequential, painless, subacute, optic neuropathy in young males. Despite the very limited therapeutic options in LHON, recent developments involving novel pharmacological agents and emerging gene therapy interventions have shown promising results for improved visual outcomes. A synthetic analogue of coenzyme Q (idebenone) is the most common medical treatment in LHON. In a multicentre, double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (Rescue of Hereditary Optic Disease Outpatient Study [RHODOS]), a dose of 900 mg/day of idebenone for 24 weeks was found to be well tolerated and safe. In a follow-up study (RHODOS-OFU), the visual acuity of 70% of patients enrolled in RHODOS was reassessed 30 months after discontinuation of idebenone. Results from this study suggested that visual acuity continued to improve even after discontinuation of the drug. Gene therapy has recently emerged as a potential treatment for LHON. RESCUE and REVERSE were two phase III clinical trials of viral-mediated gene therapy using lenadogene nolparvovec intravitreal injections in patients with early-stage LHON. Results in these trials have shown long-term safety and bilateral visual acuity improvement after unilateral intravitreal injections at 96 weeks, and sustained visual improvement after 3 years of treatment. The most recent phase III clinical trial in LHON (REFLECT) has shown significant improvement of vision after bilateral intravitreal injections of lenadogene nolparvovec compared with unilateral injections. These promising results suggest that, in the near future, LHON might become the first mitochondrial disorder to benefit from gene therapy.

Faricimab: from research to clinical practice

Development of new molecules for anti-angiogenic therapy pursues the following objectives: to increase the interval between injections, which can reduce the treatment burden; to improve the effectiveness of treatment by affecting various links of pathogenesis; to ensure a good safety profile. Faricimab is a humanized immunoglobulin G antibody that targets two key angiogenesis sites: vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2). In the STAIRWAY clinical trial, faricimab was shown to produce similar results to monthly ranibizumab at longer intervals and fewer intravitreal injections in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, specifically in terms of visual preservation and reduction in central retinal thickness (CRT). In the BOULEVARD trial, which lasted 36 weeks, the severity of diabetic retinopathy according to DRSS improved in previously untreated patients with diabetic macular edema by two stages and more in 12.2% of the 0.3 mg ranibizumab group, in 27.7% of patients in the 1.5 mg faricimab group, and in 38.6% of patients in the group treated with 6.0 mg faricimab. In the TENAYA, as well as LUCERNE, YOSEMITE and RHINE trials, the increase in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline in the faricimab group was comparable to that in the aflibercept group. Real clinical practice showed an increase in BCVA from 59.5 to 60.6 letters (p=0.035) due to a decrease in CRT from 334.3 to 303.3 µm (p=0.001). The first published studies are now appearing, and their results correspond to the clinical trials, which indicates a stable effect of the drug and the prospects for use in a large cohort of patients.

Cost of Ranibizumab Port Delivery System vs Intravitreal Injections for Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

The study team investigated costs associated with the ranibizumab port delivery system (PDS) for neovascular age-related macular (nAMD), an alternative to conventional intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. To investigate costs of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections vs ranibizumab PDS for patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD). This cost analysis used trial data and Medicare reimbursement rates and included patients with nAMD who were receiving ranibizumab, aflibercept, bevacizumab injections, or ranibizumab PDS. The number of intravitreal ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab injections to break even with costs of ranibizumab PDS. Total direct medical costs over 1 year and 5 years for the ranibizumab PDS arm with refills at fixed 6-month intervals compared with monthly or bimonthly injections were calculated using Medicare rates. Scenario and sensitivity analyses accounted for uncertainty and variation. The mean (SD) number of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab injections to break even with the cost of ranibizumab PDS with 1 refill was 10.8 (1.3), 9.3 (1.1), and 34.5 (4.2), respectively. Ranibizumab PDS with fixed 6-month refills over 1 year cost $21 016 ($2102). Comparatively, monthly intravitreal ranibizumab cost $1943 (95% CI, -$3047 to $6932; P = .34) more, aflibercept cost $5702 (95% CI, $253-$11 151; P = .04) more, and bevacizumab cost $16 732 (95% CI, -$20 170 to -$13 294, P < .001) less. For bimonthly injections, aflibercept cost $7658 (95% CI, -$11 649.52 to -$3665.61; P = .006) less. Over 5 years, monthly intravitreal ranibizumab projected to cost $25 581 (95% CI, $2275-$48 887; P = .04) more, aflibercept cost $44 374 (95% CI, $18 623-$70 125; P = .008) more, and bevacizumab cost $67 793 (95% CI, -$82 501 to -$53 085; P < .001) less than PDS with fixed refills (mean [SD] cost, $89 218 [$8921]). For bimonthly injections, aflibercept cost $22 422 (95% CI, -$40 287 to -$45,56; P = .03) less. In scenario analyses, ranibizumab PDS with refills as needed offered cost savings compared with real-world intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept use at 5 years but not at 1 year. In this cost analysis, ranibizumab PDS with 1 refill cost more than intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept injections if less than or equal to approximately 11 or 10 injections, respectively, are required within the first year. Long term, if less than 4.4 and 3.8 injections are needed per refill, intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept is lower cost. Ranibizumab PDS costs more than intravitreal bevacizumab injections throughout scenarios.

Patient Preference and Treatment Satisfaction With a Port Delivery System for Ranibizumab vs Intravitreal Injections in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

The port delivery system (PDS) with ranibizumab has demonstrated noninferior and equivalent efficacy compared with monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), but evaluating patient preference is important to help inform clinical decision-making. Evaluate treatment satisfaction for ranibizumab delivered via PDS vs intravitreal injections as well as patient preference among those assigned to PDS. Archway was a phase 3 randomized active-comparator open-label clinical trial conducted at 78 sites in the US. Patients 50 years and older with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months of screening with a documented response to anti-VEGF therapy were included. Of 619 patients screened, 418 were enrolled; 415 were included in the primary analysis and 234 were included in the secondary exploratory analysis. The Archway study ran from September 12, 2019, through primary readout on May 22, 2020. Patients were randomized 3:2 to PDS with ranibizumab, 100 mg/mL, with fixed refill exchanges every 24 weeks or intravitreal ranibizumab injections, 0.5 mg, every 4 weeks. Treatment satisfaction was measured using the Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in the PDS and intravitreal injection arms at week 40. Patient preference was assessed using the content-validated PDS Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPPQ), which measured the proportion of patients in the PDS arm with monthly monitoring who preferred treatment with the PDS at week 40 over previous intravitreal injections or concurrent fellow-eye injections. Both outcomes were exploratory end points. The mean (SD) age of participants at baseline was 75.0 (7.9) years; 234 participants (59%) were women and 162 (41%) were men. At week 40, differences in overall treatment satisfaction scores were minimal for the PDS and intravitreal injection arms (mean, 68.0; 95% CI, 67.4-68.6; n = 237 and mean, 66.1; 95% CI, 64.9-67.3; n = 159, respectively; difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.7-3.1). A total of 234 of 248 patients (94.4%) in the PDS arm were included in the PPPQ analysis. At week 40, almost all patients in the PDS arm preferred treatment via PDS (218 of 234 [93.2%]) vs previous intravitreal injections (3 of 234 [1.3%]), including 172 of 234 (73.5%) with a very strong preference for the PDS. In patients who received concurrent fellow-eye injections (n = 78), 72 (92.3%) preferred the PDS. Although PDS treatment was preferred by almost all patients assigned to PDS over previous intravitreal injections, both delivery methods have high treatment satisfaction. These findings provide further evidence for the PDS as a meaningful alternative treatment option for patients with nAMD. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03677934.

First Year Real Life Experience With Intravitreal Brolucizumab for Treatment of Refractory Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose: To assess the morphological and functional outcomes within the first year of treatment with intravitreal brolucizumab for refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: This retrospective study included 21 eyes from 19 patients with refractory nAMD followed for 12 months. All patients were switched to brolucizumab after treatment with at least two other anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF). All eyes received 3x brolucizumab 6 mg/0.05 ml intravitreal injections (IVI) monthly as an upload phase. Then eyes received an IVI every 8 weeks with interval adjustment to every 12 weeks if disease activity was not present. Main outcome measures: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and retinal fluid distribution. In addition, we reported the adverse event rate. Results: The number of previous anti-VEGF IVIs/eye was 36 ± 22 before switching to brolucizumab. BCVA (ETDRS) was 51 ± 16 before treatment and 50 ± 19 at week 52 (p = 0.6). CMT was 374 ± 158 μm before treatment and 298 ± 92 μm at week 52 (p = 0.01). The number of IVIs/eye decreased from 9.6 ± 1.9 IVIs in the last year before switching to 6.4 ± 0.9 IVIs in the first year after switching to brolucizumab (p < 0.001). The rate of eyes with subretinal fluid and pigment epithelial detachment decreased at week 52. Finally, two cases of intraocular inflammation were observed as adverse events. Conclusion: In the first year of treatment, intravitreal brolucizumab was able to stabilize visual acuity with significantly less IVIs in patients with refractory nAMD. It also improved anatomic outcomes in these patients, particularly reducing subretinal fluid and pigment epithelial detachment and subsequently central macular thickness. However, two cases of intraocular inflammation were observed as adverse events.

Assessment of the perception of healthcare barriers and the impact of intravitreal injections on neovascular age-related macular degeneration

To evaluate the perception of barriers in healthcare and the impact of intravitreal injections in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).Cross-sectional study including 108 patients with nAMD in treatment with intravitreal injections. The patients answered a questionnaire with 26 questions (score from 1 to 5) divided in three sections: 1) the disease and its treatment with injections, 2) healthcare barriers and 3) new technologies.The mean age was 80.4 ± 7.0 years and visual acuity (VA) was 75.2 ± 12.4 letters. The main barriers in healthcare were long waiting times (72%), followed by other comorbidities (10%). Some 63% of patients have to wait between 3 and 5 h to attend their clinical visit. Significant anxiety due to the injections (2.8 ± 1.3) was observed, being present in 71% of the cases the day before. A great fear of blindness and losing independence was observed (4.4 ± 0.9 and 4.3 ± 1.1), with no differences in relation to VA, age or sex (p ≥ 0.135). Moreover, 28% of the patients reported that it was quite or very difficult for them to attend the clinical visit, with 69% of the total showing great interest in having a diagnostic device at home.The nAMD and its treatment represent a significant burden on patients, among whom there is a great fear of blindness and of losing their independence, the main barrier being the long waiting time for the clinical visit.

Impact of COVID-19-associated anxiety on the adherence to intravitreal injection in patients with macular diseases a year after the initial outbreak

Background:As the primary burden of treating COVID-19 patients began to ease in the United Kingdom, ophthalmology clinic volume within the National Health Service has since recovered. Alarmingly, the rate of non-attendance remains higher than the pre-pandemic level.Purpose:The purpose was to assess how the perceived risk of contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) influences the willingness of individuals with sight-threatening macular conditions to attend intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection appointments during the second wave of the pandemic.Methods:This prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Macular Treatment Centre, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital. Patients who missed their appointment in January 2021 were invited to complete an anonymous survey over the telephone. The survey consisted of two parts: (1) a 23-item questionnaire aiming to assess fear of contracting COVID-19 in different hospital-related settings; and (2) the validated COVID-19 Anxiety Syndrome Scale (C-19ASS) to evaluate COVID-19-related anxiety.Results:A total of 104 patients agreed to participate in the survey. Only a small proportion of patients believed COVID-19 vaccination (23 out of 88, 26.1%) had influenced their willingness to attend injection appointments. Majority of patients felt concerned about contracting COVID-19 during hospital appointments (n = 63, 60.6%). Only a minority of patients (n = 36, 34.6%) agreed with the hospital guidance on minimising clinical examinations during clinic visit. The C-19ASS was significantly higher in female patients, those older than 70 years and those with mobility issues. Higher C-19ASS, older age and living alone were predictors of clinic nonattendance.Conclusion:COVID-19 anxiety and fear of viral exposure could adversely affect patient adherence to clinic appointments during the pandemic. Particular attention should be provided to older patients, those who live alone and patients with impaired mobility. This is particularly relevant as hospital eye services across the world are in the process of restarting.

Evaluación de la percepción de las barreras en la asistencia sanitaria y del impacto de las inyecciones intravítreas en la degeneración macular asociada a la edad neovascular

AimTo evaluate the perception of barriers in healthcare and the impact of intravitreal injections in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). MethodsCross-sectional study including 108 patients with nAMD in treatment with intravitreal injections. The patients answered a questionnaire with 26 questions (score from 1 to 5) divided in three sections: 1)the disease and its treatment with injections; 2)healthcare barriers, and 3)new technologies. ResultsThe mean age was 80.4±7.0 years and visual acuity (VA) was 75.2±12.4 letters. The main barriers in healthcare were long waiting times (72%), followed by other comorbidities (10%). Some 63% of patients have to wait between 3 and 5hours to attend their clinical visit. Significant anxiety due to the injections (2.8±1.3) was observed, being present in 71% of the cases the day before. A great fear of blindness and losing independence was observed (4.4±0.9 and 4.3±1.1), with no differences in relation to VA, age or sex (P≥.135). Moreover, 28% of the patients reported that it was quite or very difficult for them to attend the clinical visit, with 69% of the total showing great interest in having a diagnostic device at home. ConclusionThe nAMD and its treatment represent a significant burden on patients, among whom there is a great fear of blindness and of losing their independence, the main barrier being the long waiting time for the clinical visit.

Incidence of elevated intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection in Japanese patients with age-related macular degeneration

The purpose of this study was to report the incidence of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) after intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in Japanese patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A retrospective study of chart review of patients who underwent ≥ 10 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections between April 2009 and December 2019 was conducted. Elevated IOP was defined as IOP ≥ 25 mmHg at one visit. Cases with elevated IOP resulting from IVI were identified. Furthermore, the association between elevated IOP and some parameters, as the risk factors that influence elevated IOP, was investigated. A total of 402 eyes of 370 patients were included in this study. Twenty-eight eyes of 26 patients (7.0%) were identified as cases with elevated IOP after IVI. The mean time of elevation after baseline was 50.6 ± 26.5 months. History of glaucoma (p = 0.021; odds ratio, 5.85), treatment modality (p = 0.019; odds ratio, 6.32), and total number of injections (p = 0.003; odds ratio, 1.03) were significantly associated with elevated IOP. A late complication of elevated IOP is associated with IVI in patients with AMD. Particularly, history of glaucoma and treat and extend regimen with frequent injections were found to be risk factors of elevated IOP.