Intravitreal Aflibercept Treatment Research Articles

Differences in aqueous humor protein profiles in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy before and after aflibercept treatment

PurposeTo investigate the changes in aqueous humor (AH) protein profiles before and after intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatment in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).Methods5 PDR patients provided 10 samples of AH before and after IVA treatment (pre-group vs. post-group). Proteins were identified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Then, bioinformatics was employed to investigate the functional significance of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and hub proteins.ResultsA total of 16 DEPs were identified, consisting of 8 downregulated proteins and 8 upregulated proteins. Bioinformatics analysis indicated that the most significantly enriched biological process was “blood coagulation, intrinsic pathway.” The most significantly enriched signaling pathway was “complement and coagulation cascades.” HBB, HPX, VEGFA, and CA1 were identified as hub proteins for IVA treatment.ConclusionsTogether with the downregulation of the intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor level, IVA may also change the AH protein composition in PDR patients, with DEPs involved in the blood coagulation, intrinsic pathway, complement, and coagulation cascades. IVA treatment may protect against PDR by regulating HBB, HPX, VEGFA, and CA1 expression.

XTEND: Two-Year Results from a Global Observational Study Investigating Proactive Dosing of Intravitreal Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

XTEND (NCT03939767) is a multicenter, observational, prospective study of patients with treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in routine clinical practice. The study aims to examine treatment outcomes of proactive intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment regimens (fixed dosing or treat-and-extend) according to local marketing labels. Study eyes received IVT-AFL injections as per the local label. The mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to month (M) 12 and M24 were measured and stratified by baseline factors. Treatment exposure and safety data were evaluated. Statistical analysis was descriptive. Overall, 1466 patients from 17 countries were treated. For the overall population, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 78.7 ± 8.5 (range 50-100)years, and 891 patients (60.8%) were female. The mean ± SD baseline BCVA was 54.3 ± 20.3 letters and CST was 374 ± 126µm. At M12 and M24, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) BCVA change was + 4.3 (3.4, 5.3) and + 2.3 (1.3, 3.3) letters, respectively. Mean (95% CI) CST was - 106 (- 114, - 99) μm and - 109 (- 117, - 102) μm at M12 and M24, respectively. At M24, 41.5% of patients had a BCVA ≥ 70 letters. Patients received a mean ± SD of 7.7 ± 2.7 injections by M12 and 10.8 ± 5.0 injections by M24 (3.1 injections between M12 and M24). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of IVT-AFL. The 24-month results indicate that, in routine clinical practice, a proactive IVT-AFL regimen achieves functional improvements in patients with treatment-naïve nAMD. The proportion of patients achieving ≥ 70 letters at M24 increased, and patients with baseline BCVA ≥ 70 letters maintained vision regardless of the followed IVT-AFL label. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03939767. A video abstract is available for this article. Supplementary file2 (MP4 364624 KB).

Correlations between subfoveal choroidal thickness, macular thickness, and visual outcome in neovascular age-related macular degeneration using swept source OCT: insights from intravitreal aflibercept treatment

BackgroundAge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of visual impairment among individuals aged 50 and above, often resulting in irreversible vision loss (1). Currently, antiangiogenic therapy is the primary treatment approach for neovascular AMD (2). The choroid has gained significant attention in recent years due to its involvement in various ocular pathologies (7). The objective of this study was to evaluate visual acuity and correlate pre-treatment variables, such as foveal thickness and choroidal thickness, with post-treatment outcomes.Materials and MethodsThis study was designed as a prospective interventional study to investigate the changes in choroidal and macular thickness in patients with neovascular AMD who received intravitreal aflibercept injections. The study utilized medical records and employed Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT-SS) for evaluation. The data was collected from patients treated in Presidente Prudente, Brazil, during a three-month load dose period.ResultsThe best-corrected mean visual acuity significantly improved from 1.0 logarithm of the minimum resolution angle (logMAR) units to 0.55 logMAR after treatment with aflibercept (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing treatment exhibited a significant decrease in average macular thickness from 323 μm to 232 μm (p = 0.001), as well as a reduction in choroidal thickness from 206 μm to 172 μm (p = 0.031), while maintaining intraocular pressure within the normal range (p = 0.719) without significant variation. Statistically significant associations were found between the difference in pre- and post-treatment choroidal thickness and the pretreatment values of macular thickness (p = 0.005) and choroidal thickness (p = 0.013). There was also a statistically significant correlation between the difference in pre- and post-treatment macular thickness and the pretreatment macular thickness value (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn this study, aflibercept exhibited remarkable effectiveness in reducing macular and choroidal thickness, as evaluated using OCT-SS, and significantly improved visual acuity in patients with neovascular AMD. The assessment of both choroidal and macular changes, as well as their correlations, can provide valuable insights for clinicians, enabling them to make well-informed therapeutic decisions and effectively monitor treatment outcomes. Notably, this study contributes to the existing body of literature as the first to establish a correlation between pretreatment foveal thickness, variation in choroidal thickness, and post-treatment choroidal thickness.

Real-World Management of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion with Intravitreal Aflibercept: 24-month Results from the AURIGA Observational Study.

AURIGA is the largest real-world study to date to evaluate intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment of diabetic macular edema or macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in routine clinical practice. Here, we report the 24-month outcomes in the RVO cohort from France, Germany, Italy, and Taiwan. AURIGA (NCT03161912) was a prospective observational study. Eligible patients with RVO were enrolled for whom the decision to treat with IVT-AFL had already been made by the attending physician. Patients were treated with IVT-AFL for up to 24 months at physician discretion according to local practice. The primary endpoint was mean change in visual acuity (VA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) from baseline to month (M) 12. All statistical analyses were descriptive. In 554 treatment-naïve and 65 previously treated patients with RVO, the respective mean (95% confidence interval) change in VA from baseline was + 12.5 (10.8, 14.3) and + 7.9 (3.3, 12.6) letters by M12 and + 11.4 (9.4, 13.3) and + 4.4 (- 0.6, 9.5) letters by M24 (baseline mean ± standard deviation: 51.0 ± 21.9 and 51.9 ± 20.4 letters); 44.0% of treatment-naïve and 27.9% of previously treated patients reported ≥ 15-letter gains by M24. By M24, the mean change in central retinal thickness from baseline was - 247 (- 267, - 227) µm in treatment-naïve patients and - 147 (- 192, - 102) µm in previously treated patients. From baseline to M6, M12, and M24, treatment-naïve patients received a total of 4.0 ± 1.3, 5.5 ± 2.5, and 6.9 ± 4.2 injections, respectively, and previously treated patients received 3.8 ± 1.5, 5.0 ± 2.2, and 6.3 ± 3.7 injections, respectively. The safety profile of IVT-AFL was consistent with that of previous studies. In AURIGA, patients with RVO experienced clinically relevant functional and anatomic improvements following IVT-AFL treatment in routine clinical practice. These improvements were largely maintained in treatment-naïve patients over the 24-month study despite the decreasing treatment frequency, suggesting long-term durability of IVT-AFL treatment outcomes.Infographic available for this article. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03161912 (May 19, 2017). INFOGRAPHIC.

Longitudinal Quantitative Ultrawidefield Angiographic Features in Diabetic Retinopathy Treated with Aflibercept from the Intravitreal Aflibercept as Indicated by Real-Time Objective Imaging to Achieve Diabetic Retinopathy Improvement Trial

To report longitudinal trends of quantitative ultrawidefield fluorescein angiography (qUWFA) biomarkers in the Intravitreal Aflibercept as Indicated by Real-Time Objective Imaging to Achieve Diabetic Retinopathy Improvement (PRIME) diabetic retinopathy (DR) clinical trial. Post hoc analysis of the PRIME prospective randomized DR clinical trial comparing intravitreal aflibercept treatment based on the DR severity score (DRSS) or quantitative leakage index for DR improvement (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03531294). Patients were enrolled with a DRSS level of 47A to 71A and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/800 or better. Key exclusion criteria were previous intravitreal injection, panretinal photocoagulation, vitrectomy, central-involving macular edema, or vitreous hemorrhage. A previously validated, machine learning-based qUWFA analysis platform was used for panretinal leakage index assessment and differentiation of generalized and perivascular leakage phenotypes. Additionally, microaneurysm count and ischemic index were quantified in panretinal and macular regions. The trends in these biomarkers and therapeutic response were studied over 1 year. Longitudinal trends of qUWFA biomarkers. The impact of these qUWFA metrics on treatment response was assessed by studying their associations with time to 2-step DRSS improvement and number of treatment-free days. Forty eyes from 40 subjects with DR were enrolled. Lower baseline generalized leakage was noted in eyes that attained the 2-step DRSS improvement in < 16 weeks (1.9% vs. 2.8%; P= 0.026). Baseline macular perivascular-generalized leakage ratio had a significant correlation with the number of treatment-free days (r= 0.4; P= 0.012). At the end of 1 year, therapy significantly reduced the mean panretinal (3.9% vs. 5.8%; P= 0.002) and macular (6.2% vs. 12.2%; P= 0.008) generalized leakage indices compared with baseline, as well as the mean panretinal perivascular leakage index (1.5% vs. 2.3%; P= 0.002). The mean panretinal ischemic index demonstrated a small but likely clinically insignificant decrease from 12.5% at baseline to 11.6% at year 1 (P= 0.016). Down-trending leakage indices and microaneurysm counts were demonstrated over 1 year of anti-VEGF therapy. At baseline, DR eyes with lower generalized leakage responded to therapy more rapidly. Eyes with greater perivascular leakage relative to generalized leakage showed a longer-lasting anti-VEGF treatment response. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Long-term surveillance provides real-world evidences of safety and effectiveness in intravitreal aflibercept treatment for age-related macular degeneration

This prospective, multicentre, postmarketing surveillance were conducted to report on the long-term safety and effectiveness of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment in clinical practice of Japanese patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who newly initiated IVT-AFL treatment. The primary outcomes were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) over 36 months. Number of injections, timing of ADR occurrence, and some effectiveness index were also summarised. A total of 3,872 patients received 7.2 ± 5.8 (mean ± standard deviation) injections, and AEs occurred in 5.73% of patients. ADRs were reported in 2.76% of patients, with ocular and nonocular ADRs in 2.07% and 0.72% of patients, respectively. Most vitreo-retinal events developed within 6 months of initial IVT-AFL treatment, and most instances of increased intraocular pressure and cerebral infarction developed after 6 months of follow-up. Mean best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness were numerically better throughout the follow-up period compared with baseline. These results indicated acceptable tolerability and effectiveness of IVT-AFL treatment in patients with nAMD in clinical practice in Japan. Information regarding the risk and the timing of ADRs is valuable for safe and effective long-term treatment of patients with nAMD.Trial registration number: NCT01756248.

Evaluation of care with intravitreal aflibercept treatment for UK patients with diabetic macular oedema: DRAKO study 24-month real-world outcomes.

DRAKO (NCT02850263) was a 24-month, prospective, observational, multi-centre cohort study that enrolled patients diagnosed with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) including central involvement. The study aimed to evaluate standard of care intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment in the UK. This analysis describes the 12-month outcomes for patients with prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for DMO other than IVT-AFL (C2), and 2-year outcomes for both anti-VEGF treatment-naïve patients (C1) and C2 patients. Study eyes were treated with IVT-AFL as per local standard of care. Mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in ETDRS letters and central subfield thickness (CST) were stratified by baseline factors. Changes in diabetic retinopathy assessments, glycated haemoglobin A1c levels and vision-related quality of life (QoL) were evaluated alongside numbers of injections administered and safety outcomes. For C1, mean (SD) changes from baseline in BCVA of +0.7 (12.7) letters and CST of -123.3 (104.3) µm were observed at Month 24. For C2, mean (SD) changes from baseline for BCVA of + 0.2 (10.2) letters and -0.3 (13.0) letters, and CST of -79.1 (137.6) µm and -91.6 (132.9) µm, were observed at 12 and 24 months, respectively. In Year 2, C1 and C2 patients received a mean of 3.7 and 4.3 injections, respectively. Year 2 results indicate that IVT-AFL is an effective treatment for DMO in real-world UK clinical practice, despite relatively low injection numbers. The high baseline visual acuity and QoL scores were maintained and there was further improvement in anatomical outcomes.

Evaluation of standard-of-care intravitreal aflibercept treatment practices in patients with diabetic macular oedema in the UK: DRAKO study outcomes

Background/ObjectivesDRAKO (NCT02850263) was a 24-month, prospective, non-interventional, multi-centre cohort study enrolling patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) including central involvement. The study evaluated UK standard-of-care intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment. This analysis describes the treatment pathway and service provision for the anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment-naïve (C1) and non-naïve patients (C2) who received prior anti-VEGF treatment for DMO other than IVT-AFL.MethodsMean changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness were measured and stratified by baseline factors, including ethnicity and administration of five initial monthly injections within predefined windows. Clinic visits were classified as treatment only (T1), monitoring assessment only (T2), combined visits (T3) or post-injection visits with no treatment or assessment (T4).ResultsMedian time from decision to treat to treatment was 6 days. As a percentage of total visits, T1, T2, T3 and T4 were 7%, 42%, 48% and 3% for C1 and 11%, 39%, 48% and 2% for C2. Most IVT-AFL injections were administered by healthcare professionals (HCPs) other than doctors (C1, 57.4%; C2, 58.5%). The percentage of treatments associated with a procedure-related adverse event where at least 75% of injections were completed by the same injector role were similar for doctors and other HCPs (C1, 1.1% and 0.8%; C2, 0.7%, and 1.0%).ConclusionsResults indicate that upon DMO diagnosis, patients were treated promptly, and most visits were combined (treatment and assessment) or monitoring only. Most IVT-AFL was administered by non-physicians with a similar treatment-related safety profile as IVT-AFL administered by physicians.

Three year outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema: A comparative study.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of visual deterioration in patients with diabetes mellitus. Various treatment options have been used for DME, including intravitreal injection of steroids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors. To evaluate and compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatments in patients with DME. Retrospective study. Four hundred three eyes of 235 naïve patients who underwent IVR or IVA treatment for DME followed up to 36 months included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at baseline, year 1, 2 and 3. Primary endpoint of the study was the change in BCVA and CMT each year from baseline and requirement of additional treatment (laser/steroid injection). There were 198 eyes in IVR group and 205 eyes in IVA group. The changes in mean BCVA were 0.09 ± 0.32 versus 0.17 ± 0.41 Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (p = 0.042) at year 1, 0.09 ± 0.37 versus 0.12 ± 0.45 logMAR (p = 0.512) at year 2 and 0.13 ± 0.36 versus 0.15 ± 0.48 logMAR (p = 0.824) at year 3 in IVA and IVR groups, respectively. The baseline mean BCVA were lower (p = 0.004) in IVA group. The mean total number of injections was 7.93 ± 3.38 versus 7.42 ± 3.05 (p = 0.112). At year 1, change in mean BCVA was statistically significantly higher in IVA group; however this difference did not persist at years 2 and 3. Although the mean total number of injections was similar between groups, the requirement for adjuvant steroid treatment was significantly higher in ranibizumab group, which may affect the number of visits and treatment costs. Both ranibizumab and aflibercept treatments achieved a good long-term visual and anatomical response in DME patients.

Final 4-year results of the RAINBOW real-world study: intravitreal aflibercept dosing regimens in France in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate real-world treatment outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in routine clinical practice in France.MethodsRAINBOW (NCT02279537) was an ambispective, observational, 4-year study assessing IVT-AFL effectiveness, treatment patterns, and safety in patients with nAMD in France. Treatment-naïve patients prescribed IVT-AFL and treated according to local practice (pro re nata or treat-and-extend) were eligible. Three treatment cohorts were retrospectively identified based on their treatment pattern within the first 12 months: regular (3 initial monthly IVT-AFL injections received within 45–90 days after the first injection in month 0 and followed by injections every 2 months), irregular with the initial monthly injections, and irregular without the initial monthly injections. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 12. The 48-month results are described here.ResultsOverall, the study included 516 patients (each with one study eye), and 30.2% of patients completed 48 months of IVT-AFL treatment. Mean change in BCVA from baseline (56.5 letters) to month 48 for patients with an assessment at both time points was + 1.1 (regular cohort, n = 47), + 0.1 (irregular cohort with initial monthly injections, n = 115), and − 1.3 letters (irregular cohort without initial monthly injections, n = 26), representing a decrease from the gains achieved at month 12. Mean number of IVT-AFL injections received by month 48 in the treatment cohorts was 14.9, 13.7, and 11.9, respectively. The safety profile of IVT-AFL was consistent with previous studies.ConclusionIn RAINBOW, the 48-month results demonstrate a lack of long-term effectiveness of IVT-AFL treatment of nAMD due to progressive undertreatment in routine clinical practice in France. These real-world findings highlight the importance of 3 initial monthly IVT-AFL injections followed by continuous proactive treatment beyond the first year to achieve optimal functional outcomes.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02279537.

Two-year outcomes of the APOLLON observational study of intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy in France in patients with diabetic macular edema

APOLLON (NCT02924311) was a prospective observational study to evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) over 24 months in routine clinical practice in France. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) by 12 months, and safety was monitored throughout the study. Of 402 patients enrolled across 61 participating clinics and hospitals in France, 168 patients were followed for at least 24 months and included in the effectiveness analyses (79 treatment-naïve and 89 previously treated). After 24 months of IVT-AFL treatment, the mean (± standard deviation [SD]) change in BCVA from baseline was + 6.5 (± 10.7) letters in treatment-naïve patients (p < 0.001) and + 1.6 (± 17.0) letters in previously treated patients (p = 0.415) from a baseline of 63.8 (± 13.6) and 60.5 (± 16.5) letters. The mean number of IVT-AFL treatments over 24 months was 11.3 (± 4.9) and 11.9 (± 4.7) for treatment-naïve and previously treated patients. This final analysis of the APOLLON study indicated that following 24 months of IVT-AFL treatment in routine clinical practice in France, treatment-naïve patients with DME achieved significant gains in visual acuity and previously treated patients maintained prior visual acuity gains.Trial registration number: NCT02924311.

Intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in routine clinical practice in Latin America: the AQUILA study

BackgroundAQUILA (NCT03470103) was a prospective, observational, 12-month cohort study evaluating treatment patterns, clinical effectiveness, and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients from Latin America with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).MethodsTreatment-naïve and previously treated (switching to IVT-AFL) patients (aged ≥ 55 years) were enrolled from March 2018, with a primary completion date of September 2020, from Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, and Mexico. Patients received IVT-AFL in a routine clinical practice setting.ResultsOf 274 patients in the full analysis set, 201 were treatment-naïve and 73 had received previous treatment. The mean ± standard deviation number of IVT-AFL injections received by month 12 was 4.2 ± 1.9 (treatment-naïve) and 5.2 ± 2.7 (previously treated). The median duration from diagnosis to IVT-AFL treatment was 1.2 months (treatment-naïve) and 19.5 months (previously treated). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) improved from baseline to month 12 by + 5.2 ± 18.3 (treatment-naïve; baseline: 48.2 ± 23.5) and + 3.1 ± 15.3 letters (previously treated; baseline: 47.7 ± 21.4).ConclusionAQUILA is the first study to assess the use of IVT-AFL in routine clinical practice in Latin America. Mean BCVA and other visual acuity outcomes improved in both treatment groups, despite many patients not receiving the IVT-AFL label-recommended regimen of three initial monthly doses, or seven or more injections in 12 months. Patients who did receive the label-recommended number of injections had numerically greater improvements in visual acuity outcomes. Patients with nAMD treated regularly and more frequently with IVT-AFL, therefore, have the potential to achieve outcomes consistent with those observed in interventional studies.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03470103. Registered February 5, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03470103

Intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema in routine clinical practice in Latin America: the AQUILA study

BackgroundAQUILA (NCT03470103) was a prospective, observational, 12-month cohort study to understand treatment patterns and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients from Latin America with diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsTreatment-naïve and previously treated (switching to IVT-AFL) patients (aged ≥ 18 years) were enrolled from March 2018, with a primary completion date of September 2020, from Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica and Mexico. Patients received IVT-AFL in a routine clinical practice setting.ResultsOf 258 patients in the full analysis set, 181 were treatment-naïve and 77 had received previous treatment. The mean ± standard deviation number of IVT-AFL injections by Month 12 was 3.7 ± 1.8 (treatment-naïve) and 4.0 ± 2.2 (previously treated). The median duration from diagnosis to IVT-AFL treatment was 1.8 months (treatment-naïve) and 16.0 months (previously treated). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) improved from baseline to Month 12 by + 8.1 ± 17.7 (treatment-naïve; baseline: 54.5 ± 19.4) and + 4.6 ± 15.4 letters (previously treated; baseline: 52.9 ± 18.6).ConclusionAQUILA is the first study to assess the use of IVT-AFL in routine clinical practice in Latin America. Despite few patients being treated with the label-recommended regimen of 5 initial monthly doses or receiving ≥ 8 injections in 12 months, functional and anatomic visual outcomes improved during 12 months of treatment with IVT-AFL. Patients receiving the label-recommended number of injections had numerically greater improvements in visual acuity outcomes. Patients with DME treated regularly and more frequently with IVT-AFL therefore have the potential to achieve outcomes consistent with those observed in interventional studies.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03470103. Registered February 5, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03470103

Effect of Intravitreal Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation on Treatment Success of Retinopathy of Prematurity

Laser photocoagulation, which is the standard treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), can have adverse events. Studies of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections have suggested efficacy in the treatment of ROP, but few studies have directly compared them with laser treatments. To compare intravitreal aflibercept vs laser photocoagulation in infants with ROP requiring treatment. This noninferiority, phase 3, 24-week, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 27 countries (64 hospital sites) throughout Asia, Europe, and South America. Overall, 118 infants (gestational age ≤32 weeks at birth or birth weight ≤1500 g) with ROP severity (zone I stage 1+ [stage 1 plus increased disease activity], zone I stage 2+, zone I stage 3, zone I stage 3+, zone II stage 2+, or zone II stage 3+) requiring treatment or with aggressive posterior ROP in at least 1 eye were enrolled between September 25, 2019, and August 28, 2020 (the last visit occurred on February 12, 2021). Infants were randomized 2:1 to receive a 0.4-mg dose of intravitreal aflibercept (n = 75) or laser photocoagulation (n = 43) at baseline. Additional treatment was allowed as prespecified. The primary outcome was the proportion of infants without active ROP and unfavorable structural outcomes 24 weeks after starting treatment (assessed by investigators). The requirement for rescue treatment was considered treatment failure. Intravitreal aflibercept was deemed noninferior if the lower limit of the 1-sided 95% bayesian credible interval for the treatment difference was greater than -5%. Among 118 infants randomized, 113 were treated (mean gestational age, 26.3 [SD, 1.9] weeks; 53 [46.9%] were female; 16.8% had aggressive posterior ROP, 19.5% had zone I ROP, and 63.7% had zone II ROP) and 104 completed the study. Treatment (intravitreal aflibercept: n = 75; laser photocoagulation: n = 38) was mostly bilateral (92.9%), and 82.2% of eyes in the intravitreal aflibercept group received 1 injection per eye. Treatment success was 85.5% with intravitreal aflibercept vs 82.1% with laser photocoagulation (between-group difference, 3.4% [1-sided 95% credible interval, -8.0% to ∞]). Rescue treatment was required in 4.8% (95% CI, 1.9% to 9.6%) of eyes in the intravitreal aflibercept group vs 11.1% (95% CI, 4.9% to 20.7%) of eyes in the laser photocoagulation group. The serious adverse event rates were 13.3% (ocular) and 24.0% (systemic) in the intravitreal aflibercept group compared with 7.9% and 36.8%, respectively, in the laser photocoagulation group. Three deaths, which occurred 4 to 9 weeks after intravitreal aflibercept treatment, were considered unrelated to aflibercept by the investigators. Among infants with ROP, intravitreal aflibercept compared with laser photocoagulation did not meet criteria for noninferiority with respect to the primary outcome of the proportion of infants achieving treatment success at week 24. Further data would be required for more definitive conclusions regarding the comparative effects of intravitreal aflibercept and laser photocoagulation in this population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04004208.

Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Requiring Intensive Intravitreal Aflibercept Treatment: An ARIES Post Hoc Analysis.

IntroductionThe aim of this post hoc analysis of the ARIES study is to explore the requirement for intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment intervals of < 8 weeks (w) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), and to assess vision and anatomic outcomes in such patients who require more intensive treatment.MethodsARIES was a multicenter, randomized, phase 3b/4 study that investigated the efficacy of two IVT-AFL proactive, individualized, treat-and-extend regimens over 2 years in treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. Patients were determined as injection-intensive if the study investigator identified that a treatment interval of < 8 w was needed and if they had ≥ 1 interval of < 8 w after three initial monthly doses. Treatment intervals could be extended subsequently if extension criteria were met. This is a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in ARIES and statistical analysis is descriptive.ResultsOf 269 patients in the combined treatment arms, 23.0% (n = 62) were injection-intensive (Year 1: 13.8% [n = 37]; Year 2: 9.3% [n = 25]). Time from IVT-AFL initiation to injection-intensive determination varied (range, 16–100 w; median: 43.2 w). Mean treatment interval was 8.4 w before and 6.1 w after injection-intensive determination. Overall, 59.7% achieved treatment intervals of ≥ 8 w following injection-intensive determination. Vision improvements from baseline to Week 104 were smaller for injection-intensive patients than non–injection-intensive patients (mean [SD] best-corrected visual acuity change: + 2.3 [15.6] vs. + 5.9 [12.3] letters). Anatomic outcomes were similar between injection-intensive and non–injection-intensive patients (central retinal thickness change from baseline to Week 104: − 160 [154] vs. − 167 [136] µm).ConclusionsIn ARIES, 23% of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD experienced at least one treatment interval of < 8 w. Injection-intensive patients showed improved vision and anatomic outcomes. For most, treatment intervals could be extended to ≥ 8 w following injection-intensive determination. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581891.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00541-8.

Retinal oxygen saturation, vessel diameter and flicker response in eyes with specific subtypes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration during aflibercept treatment.

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy on arterial and venous oxygen saturation, retinal vessel diameter and flicker response in patients with newly diagnosed specific subtypes of exudative maculopathy.MethodsThis prospective study included forty-four eyes of 44 patients with treatment-naïve polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV, n = 12), hemorrhagic choroidal neovascularization (hCNV, n = 12), pigment epithelium detachment (PED, n = 9) and type 3 MNV (RAP, n = 11). All patients received three initial aflibercept 2mg/0.05ml injections (Eylea®) in monthly intervals (loading phase) and were subsequently treated until month 12. Measurements of arterial and venous oxygen saturation, vessel diameters and flicker response were performed using the Dynamic Vessel Analyzer (DVA; IMEDOS, Jena, Germany). Statistical analysis was performed on the total population at baseline, after loading dose and at the last follow-up visit.ResultsThe arterial oxygen saturation was 94.01±2.14% and showed no change after loading dose (93.94±2.88%, p = 0.4; estimated difference [confidence interval] -0.38 [-1.24; 0.48]) and at the last visit (95.48±1.90%; p = 0.1; -1.29 [-0.34; 2.91]). The venous oxygenation during treatment was 78.49±6.93% at baseline, 80.94±7.71% after 3-monthly injections (p = 0.7; -0.43 [-2.72; 1.86]) and 80.56±7.33% at month 12 (p = 0.5; 1.07 [-2.10; 4.24). The arterial and venous vessel diameters were 94±22μm and 131±19μm at baseline, and remained unchanged following aflibercept loading dose and at the last follow-up visit (p-value: p = 0.5; 2.30 [-5.00; 9.59] p = 0.8; 0.59 [-3.17; 4.34]). During stimulation with flicker light, arterial diameter changed by +1.24±4.93% at baseline and remained stable at month 3 (+2.70±5.95%; p = 0.5; 1.43 [-2.54; 5.41]) while the change in venous diameter during flicker stimulation was +4.52±4.45% at baseline and +4.13±3.65% after loading dose (p = 0.4, 5.18 [1.73; 8.63]).ConclusionDuring intravitreal aflibercept treatment oxygen saturation, vessel diameter and flicker response did not change in the total population of patients with specific subtypes of exudative maculopathy.

PERSEUS-IT 24-month analysis: a prospective observational study to assess the effectiveness of intravitreal aflibercept in routine clinical practice in Italy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PurposePERSEUS-IT (NCT02289924) was a prospective, observational, 2-year study evaluating the effectiveness and treatment patterns of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in routine clinical practice in Italy.MethodsTreatment-naïve patients with nAMD receiving IVT-AFL per routine clinical practice were enrolled. The primary endpoint was mean change in visual acuity (VA; decimals) from baseline to month (M) 12 and M24. Outcomes were evaluated for the overall study population and independently for the 2 treatment cohorts: regular (3 initial monthly doses, ≥ 7 injections by M12, and ≥ 4 injections between M12 and M24) and irregular (any other pattern).ResultsOf 813 patients enrolled, 709 were included in the full analysis set (FAS); VA assessments were available for 342 patients at M12 (FAS1Y, 140 regular and 202 irregular) and 233 patients at M24 (FAS2Y, 37 regular and 196 irregular). In the overall FAS, the mean ± SD change in VA from baseline to M12 and M24 was + 0.09 ± 0.24 and + 0.02 ± 0.25 decimals, and there was a statistically significant difference between the regular and irregular cohorts in both FAS1Y (p = 0.0034) and FAS2Y (p = 0.0222). Ocular treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 4.1% (n = 33/810 [safety set]) of patients.ConclusionIn PERSEUS-IT, clinically relevant functional and anatomic improvements were observed within the first 12 months of IVT-AFL treatment in routine clinical practice in Italy in patients with treatment-naïve nAMD. These gains were generally maintained across the 2-year study. The safety profile of IVT-AFL was consistent with prior studies.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02289924.Date of registrationNovember 13, 2014.

OCTA changes following loading phase with intravitreal aflibercept for DME

ObjectifMesurer les variations observées à l'angiographie-tomographie par cohérence optique (OCTA) à la suite de l'administration intravitréenne d'anti-VEGF (facteur de croissance endothélial vasculaire) dans le traitement de l’œdème maculaire diabétique (OMD), et évaluer le lien entre les paramètres mesurés à l'OCTA avant le traitement et les résultats visuels. NatureÉtude de cohorte prospective. MéthodesUn groupe de 29 patients présentant un OMD ont reçu 5 injections intravitréennes mensuelles d'aflibercept. On a eu recours au test de Wilcoxon pour observations appariées afin de comparer les données mesurées à l'OCTA au départ et après 6 mois. Au nombre des paramètres mesurés à l'OCTA, citons l'aire de la zone fovéale avasculaire (ZFA), le périmètre de la ZFA, la circularité de la ZFA, la densité vasculaire du plexus vasculaire superficiel (segmenté conformément à la cartographie de l’étude ETDRS [Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study], soit zone centrale, zone interne, zone externe et zone complète). Une sous-analyse a permis de séparer les patients en 2 groupes : sujets qui ont répondu au traitement (réduction de l’épaisseur du sous-champ central > 50 µm pendant le traitement) et sujets qui n'ont pas répondu au traitement. Une régression linéaire multiple et une régression logistique ont servi à déterminer les liens entre les paramètres mesurés à l'OCTA avant le traitement et les résultats en matière d'acuité visuelle. RésultatsUn total de 29 patients ont été inclus: 25 patients (86,2 %) présentaient une rétinopathie diabétique non proliférante et 4 (13,8 %), une rétinopathie diabétique proliférante. La densité vasculaire a diminué dans les zones centrale (p = 0,004) et interne (p = 0,013) selon la cartographie de l’étude ETDRS. Cet effet n’était significatif que chez les patients qui ont répondu au traitement (zone centrale; p = 0,002; zone interne; p = 0,017). Les paramètres OCT et OCTA mesurés avant le traitement n'ont pas influé sur les résultats ultimes en matière d'acuité visuelle. ConclusionOn a noté, après l'administration intravitréenne d'aflibercept dans le traitement de l'OMD, une diminution significative de la densité vasculaire du plexus vasculaire superficiel dans les zones centrale et interne selon la cartographie de l'ETDRS. Ce phénomène s'est produit exclusivement chez les patients qui ont répondu au traitement. Nos observations tiennent vraisemblablement aux limites de la technologie de l'OCTA elle-même, en ce sens que la densité vasculaire avant le traitement a potentiellement été surestimée par la présence d'artéfacts, soit quelques particules en suspension en mouvement. Les paramètres mesurés à l'OCTA avant le traitement n'ont pas pu servir de biomarqueurs permettant de prévoir les résultats visuels après l'administration d'un anti-VEGF.

Long term results of three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in pachychoroid neovasculopathy

Purpose To assess morphological changes and visual results in eyes with pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV) that underwent different intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. Materials and methods This is a retrospective, observational, comparative study that included 76 PNV eyes in 76 patients that were allocated to three groups according to the monotherapy injection procedure, as follows: the intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) group, intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) group, and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) group. Central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) were measured at baseline, after treatment 1st month, 3rd month, 6th month, and 12th month, and at the final post-treatment examination. Results Mean age of the patients was 57.31 ± 5.91 years (range: 34–67 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 31.50 ± 12.91 months (range: 13–60 months). The IVB group included 30 eyes, the IVR group included 22 eyes, and the IVA group included 24 eyes. There weren’t any significant differences in BCVA changes between the groups at any post-baseline measurement time point. Although CMT did not change significantly in the IVB group from baseline to the final follow-up visit (baseline: 376.33 ± 86.31 µm; final visit: 340.80 ± 122.70 µm) (p = 0.172), CMT did change significantly in the IVA group (baseline: 383.41 ± 131.83 µm; final visit: 297.33 ± 103.81 µm) (p = 0.029) and IVR group (baseline: 379.18 ± 97.93 µm; final visit: 335.72 ± 111.45 µm) (p = 0.041). SFCT decreased significantly in the IVR and IVA groups (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean number of injections was 12.06 ± 4.72 (range: 6–20) in the IVB group, 11.81 ± 3.31(range: 7–17) in the IVR group, and 7.16 ± 3.15 (range: 4–13) in the IVA group (p = 0.004). Conclusion All three anti-VEGFs were effective in terms of visual results in patients with PNV. Patients treated with IVA required fewer injections than those treated with IVB or IVR. Furthermore, IVR and IVA treatment significantly decreased SFCT, whereas IVB did not.

Real-World Data on Intravitreal Aflibercept for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: 24-Month Outcomes.

PurposeTo report on the safety and effectiveness of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in clinical practice in Japan.Patients and MethodsThis prospective, noninterventional, multicenter post-authorization safety study enrolled patients who were treated with IVT-AFL for macular edema secondary to CRVO and followed up for 24 months. The primary outcome was the occurrence of safety events. Other pre-specified outcomes were indicators of effectiveness, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and frequency of injections.ResultsThe safety analysis included 377 patients who received at least one IVT-AFL. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 22 patients (5.84%) and adverse drug reactions occurred in 5 (1.33%) over 24 months. Of the 22 patients with AEs, 72.7% experienced their first AEs by the third injection. The effectiveness analysis set comprised 360 patients for whom data on each outcome could be collected. The number of injections over 24 months was 3.4 ± 2.4 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). BCVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.709 ± 0.535 (mean ± SD) (n = 357) at baseline and 0.543 ± 0.559 (n = 97) after 24 months of treatment with IVT-AFL. CRT was 552.6 ± 211.3 μm (mean ± SD) (n = 214) at baseline and 331.5 ± 144.0 μm (n = 54) at 24 months.ConclusionThere were no new safety issues concerning routine administration of IVT-AFL for macular edema secondary to CRVO. BCVA recovered during 24 months of IVT-AFL treatment in the real-world setting. However, there was a trend toward less improvement compared with the results of randomized controlled trials, likely due in part to undertreatment.