Intravenous Regional Anesthesia Research Articles

Ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve block: A bright future on the horizon

Objective: In light of the advancement of modern medicine, anesthesiologists and surgeons are increasingly prioritizing patient comfort in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. A growing body of research revolves around the utilization of ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve blocks for surgeries involving the distal upper limb. This review aims to provide an overview of regional anesthesia techniques in forearm, hand, and wrist surgeries, laying a theoretical foundation for the prospects of ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve blocks in optimizing comfort during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Methods: A retrospective review of literature sourced from the PubMed database was conducted to comprehensively evaluate and elucidate the advantages and drawbacks of ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve blocks, brachial plexus blocks, Bier blocks, and wrist blocks. Additionally, a summary was provided regarding the selection of local anesthetics for ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve blocks. Results: Overall, ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve block techniques exhibit several advantages over Bier’s block, brachial plexus block, and wrist block for the majority of forearm, wrist, and hand surgeries. These advantages include reduced anesthesia-related time, prolonged duration of analgesia, and minimal impairment of upper extremity motor function. Consequently, these techniques enhance surgical safety and facilitate postoperative recovery. Furthermore, the addition of dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone to ultrasound-guided selective nerve blocks of the forearm could extend the duration of analgesia. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve block is a straightforward and conducive anesthesia method for distal upper limb surgeries, aligning with the principles of fast surgical recovery and enhanced patient comfort during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Given its manifold benefits, widespread promotion and adoption of this technique in clinical practice are warranted.

Haematoma block is the most efficient technique for closed forearm fracture reduction: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundForearm fractures are a common ED presentation. This study aimed to compare the resource utilisation of three anaesthetic techniques used for closed forearm fracture reduction in the ED: haematoma block...

Comparison of 0.5% lignocaine versus 0.2% ropivacaine in intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier’s block) in upper limb surgeries

Comparison of 0.5% lignocaine versus 0.2% ropivacaine in intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier’s block) in upper limb surgeries

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: statistical analysis plan

BackgroundUltrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB) is an emerging technique gaining interest amongst emergency physicians that provides regional anaesthesia to the upper limb to tolerate painful procedures. It offers an alternative to the more traditional technique of a Bier block (BB). However, the effectiveness or safety of UGSCB when performed in the emergency department (ED) is unclear.MethodsSUPERB (SUPraclavicular block for Emergency Reduction versus Bier block) is a prospective open-label non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of UGSCB versus BB for closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations. Adult patients presenting with upper limb fracture and/or dislocation requiring closed reduction in ED were randomised to either UGSCB or BB. Once regional anaesthesia is obtained, closed reduction of the injured part was performed and immobilised. The primary outcome is maximal pain experienced during closed reduction measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include post-reduction pain, patient satisfaction, total opioid requirement in ED, ED length of stay, adverse events and regional anaesthesia failure.ResultsPrimary outcome analysis will be performed using both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The between-group difference in maximum pain intensity will be assessed using linear regression modelling with trial group allocation (UGSCB vs BB) included as a main affect. A pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 20 mm on the VAS scale will be used to establish non-inferiority of UGSCB compared to BB.ConclusionSUPERB is the first randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and safety of UGSCB in the ED. The trial has the potential to demonstrate that UGSCB is an alternative safe and effective option for the management of upper extremity emergencies in the ED.

Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) versus Regional Anesthesia with Tourniquet for Hand Flexor Tendon Repair Surgeries in Adults

Abstract Background Flexor tendon injuries represent a significant percentage of admissions in emergency departments in Egypt. A bloodless surgical field is important to perform a hand surgery. Traditionally, a tourniquet is used for hemostasis, and the standered anesthetic techniques utilized in hand surgery were general anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia, or brachial plexus block. Recently the evolving Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique where patient is operated on under local anesthesia and hemostasis is achieved via adrenaline could be a better choice. Aim of this work is to compare the intraoperative pain scores, induction time, operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain scores, and patient satisfaction with WALANT versus supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SC-BPB ) with tourniquet, in patients undergoing flexor tendon repair. Patients and Methods In the current study 52 patients who underwent flexor tendon intervention were divided randomly into two groups, each group consisting of 26 patients. Group A: Patients in this group received WALANT. Group B: Patients in this group received SC-BPB with a tourniquet applied to the arm. Results Intraoperative Wong-Baker Faces scale revealed no statistically significant difference in intraoperative pain scores in both groups, except during injection (p = 0.04). Tourniquet-related pain was reported in 23% of patients of SC-BPB group (p = 0.001). Induction time was significantly shorter in WALANT (p < 0.01) but time needed to obtain sufficient hemostasis is significantly more in WALANT than SC-BPB (p < 0.01) while surgical time was similar in both groups (p = 0.538). Blood loss in spite of being minimal it was statistically significant higher in WALANT (p < 0.01). Conclusion WALANT anesthesia was found to be better alternative to SC-BPB in flexor tendon repair surgeries in adults being more simple technique and no need for special skills or ultrasound device, less time consumed in induction and less injection pain also no tourniquet-related pain, intraoperative active motion of the hand is preserved facilitating surgical technique, better effect on postoperative analgesia and more patient and surgeon satisfaction.

Efficacy and Safety of Adding Ketamine to Lidocaine in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PurposeTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding ketamine (K) to lidocaine (L) for intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis. MethodsA comprehensive search of the Cochrane library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases, and the Google Scholar search engine was conducted from inception to March 2023. All retrieved articles were imported into Endnote X20 software and independently screened by two researchers according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were analyzed using Revman 5.4 software and the assessed outcomes included the time of sensory and motor block onset, time of sensory and motor block recovery, fentanyl consumption, time of tourniquet pain onset, intraoperative and postoperative visual analog scale scores, and complications. FindingsA total of 532 patients from 11 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the time of sensory (P < .00001) and motor block onset (P < .00001) were shorter in the L + K group than in the L-only group. The time of sensory (P = .01) and motor block recovery (P = .006) and time of tourniquet pain onset (P < .00001) were longer in the L + K group than in the L-only group. There was a significant reduction in fentanyl consumption (P = .0002) in the L + K group compared to the L-only group. Moreover, the visual analog scale scores in the L + K group were significantly lower than the L-only group 10 minutes (P = .04), 20 minutes (P = .0004), 30 minutes (P < .00001), and 40 minutes (P < .0001) after tourniquet inflation, and 5 minutes (P < .00001), 15 minutes (P = .04), 30 minutes (P = .008), 1 hour (P = .002), 2 hours (P < .00001), and 4 hours (P < .00001) after tourniquet deflation. There was no evidence that the use of K as an adjuvant in IVRA increased adverse effects. ConclusionsThe addition of K to L in IVRA shortened the onset time, prolonged the block time, and reduced intraoperative and postoperative pain without increasing complications.

1076 Stop Before You Bier's Block- a Major Trauma Centre's Experience of Improving Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia Safety

1076 Stop Before You Bier's Block- a Major Trauma Centre's Experience of Improving Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia Safety

Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Compared with Other Regional Anesthesia Techniques in Distal Upper Limb Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Several regional anesthesia (RA) techniques have been described for distal upper limb surgery. However, the best approach in terms of RA block success rate and safety is not well recognized. Objective: To assess and compare the surgical anesthesia and efficacy of axillary brachial plexus block with other RA techniques for hand and wrist surgery. The attainment of adequate surgical anesthesia 30 min after block placement was considered a primary outcome measure. Additionally, successful block outcomes were required without the use of supplemental local anesthetic injection, systemic opioid analgesia, or the need to convert to general anesthesia. Methods: We performed a systematic search in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CENTRAL. RCTs comparing axillary blocks with other brachial plexus block techniques, distal peripheral forearm nerve block, intravenous RA, and the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique were included. Results: In total, 3070 records were reviewed, of which 28 met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of adequate surgical anesthesia showed no significant difference between ultrasound-guided axillary block and supraclavicular block (RR: 0.94 [0.89, 1.00]; p = 0.06; I2 = 60.00%), but a statistically significant difference between ultrasound-guided axillary block and infraclavicular block (RR: 0.92 [0.88, 0.97]; p < 0.01; I2 = 53.00%). Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks were performed faster than ultrasound-guided axillary blocks (SMD: 0.74 [0.30, 1.17]; p < 0.001; I2 = 85.00%). No differences in performance time between ultrasound-guided axillary and supraclavicular blocks were demonstrated. Additionally, adequate surgical anesthesia onset time was not significantly different between ultrasound-guided block approaches: ultrasound-guided axillary blocks versus ultrasound-guided supraclavicular blocks (SMD: 0.52 [-0.14, 1.17]; p = 0.12; I2 = 86.00%); ultrasound-guided axillary blocks versus ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks (SMD: 0.21 [-0.49, 0.91]; p = 0.55; I2 = 92.00%). Conclusions: The RA choice should be individualized depending on the patient, procedure, and operator-specific parameters. Compared to ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular block, ultrasound-guided axillary block may be preferred for patients with significant concerns of block-related side effects/complications. High heterogeneity between studies shows the need for more robust RCTs.

In Reply: The Optimal Dose of Lidocaine for Bier Blocks.

In Reply: The Optimal Dose of Lidocaine for Bier Blocks.

The Optimal Dose of Lidocaine for Bier Block.

The Optimal Dose of Lidocaine for Bier Block.

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF INTRAOSSEOUS ROPIVACAINE IN LOWER EXTREMITY (SORE) STUDY

IntroductionDay stay surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions is an increasingly common practice and has driven clinicians to come up with postoperative pain regimes that allow same day mobilisation and a safe and timely discharge. There is a paucity of literature surrounding the use of intraosseous (IO) ropivacaine used as a Bier's block to provide both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in lower limb surgery.MethodsThis patient blinded, pilot study randomised 15 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction to receive either IO ropivacaine 1.5 or 2.0 mg/kg; or 300 mg of ropivacaine as local infiltration (standard of care). Toxic plasma levels of ropivacaine have been defined in the literature and therefore the primary outcome for this study was arterial plasma concentration of ropivacaine as a means to determine its safety profile. Samples were taken via an arterial line at prespecified times after tourniquet deflation. Secondary outcomes that we were interested in included immediate postoperative pain scores using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and perioperative opioid equivalent consumption.ResultsParticipants had a mean age of 27.8 (SD 9.2) years and 87% (13/15) were male. All patients in the intervention group receiving IO ropivacaine had plasma concentrations well below the threshold for central nervous system (CNS) toxicity (0.60 µg/ml). The highest plasma concentration was achieved in the intervention group receiving 1.5 mg/kg dose of ropivacaine reaching 3.59 mg/ml. This would equate to 0.22 µg/ml of free plasma ropivacaine. There were no differences across the three groups regarding pain scores or perioperative opioid consumption.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that IO administration of 0.2% ropivacaine is both safe and effective in reducing perioperative pain in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. There may be scope to increase the IO dose further or utilise other analgesics via the IO regional route to improve perioperative pain relief.

Dexmedetomidine Prolongs Lidocaine Intravenous Regional Anesthesia in Rats by Blocking the Hyperpolarization-Activated Cation Current.

Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) using lidocaine provides effective localized analgesia but its duration is limited. The mechanism by which dexmedetomidine enhances lidocaine IVRA is unclear but may involve modulation of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels. Lidocaine IVRA with varying dexmedetomidine concentrations was performed in the tails of Sprague-Dawley rats. Tail-flick and tail-clamping tests assessed IVRA analgesia and anesthesia efficacy and duration. Contributions of α2 adrenergic receptors and HCN channels were evaluated by incorporating an α adrenergic receptor antagonist, the HCN channel inhibitor ZD7288, and the HCN channel agonist forskolin. Furthermore, whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology quantified the effects of dexmedetomidine on HCN channels mediating hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) in isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons. Dexmedetomidine dose-dependently extended lidocaine IVRA duration and analgesia, unaffected by α2 receptor blockade. The HCN channel inhibitor ZD7288 also prolonged lidocaine IVRA effects, while the HCN channel activator forskolin shortened effects. In dorsal root ganglion neurons, dexmedetomidine concentration-dependently inhibited Ih amplitude and shifted the voltage-dependence of HCN channel activation. Dexmedetomidine prolongs lidocaine IVRA duration by directly inhibiting HCN channel activity, independent of α2 adrenergic receptor activation. This HCN channel inhibition represents a novel mechanism underlying the anesthetic and analgesic adjuvant effects of dexmedetomidine in IVRA.

Pecto-intercostal Fascial Plane Block: A Novel Technique for Analgesia in Patients with Sternal Dehiscence.

Sternal wound complications following sternotomy need a multidisciplinary approach in high-risk postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Poorly controlled pain during surgical management of such wounds increases cardiovascular stress and respiratory complications. Multimodal analgesia including intravenous opioids, non-opioid analgesics, and regional anesthesia techniques, like central neuraxial blocks and fascial plane blocks, have been described. Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB), a novel technique, has been effectively used in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Under ultrasound (US) guidance PIFB is performed with the aim of depositing local anesthetic between two superficial muscles, namely the pectoralis major muscle and the external intercostal muscle. The authors report a series of five cases where US-guided bilateral PIFB was used in patients undergoing sternal wound debridement. Patients had excellent analgesia intraoperatively as well as postoperatively for 24 hours with minimal requirement of supplemental analgesia. None of the patients experienced complications due to PIFB administration. The authors concluded that bilateral PIFB can be effectively used as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia with general anesthesia and as a sole anesthesia technique in selected cases of sternal wound debridement.

Comparison of effectiveness of combination of xylocaine and dexmedetomidine with xylocaine alone in biers block of upper limb.

Objective: To evaluate two groups (combination versus xylocaine alone) in terms of onset of motor block, duration of block, and postoperative analgesia following the release of the tourniquet. Study Design: Quasi Experimental study. Setting: Chaudhary Muhammad Akram Teaching &amp; Research Hospital. Period: 01 June 2023 to 30 Nov 2023. Material &amp; Methods: Quasi experimental study design with a sample of total 80 patients divided into two groups of 40 each (xylocaine alone &amp; combination of xylocaine and dexmedetomidine) were selected by using non probability convenient sampling technique. Results: Combining dexmedetomidine with xylocaine in Bier's block for upper limb surgery demonstrated significant advantages. Group B exhibited faster onset (3.8 min), prolong motor block, and prolonged postoperative analgesia (12.4 hrs) compared to group A (xylocaine alone: 5.2 min onset &amp; shorter postoperative analgesia 6.8 hrs). Dexmedetomidine enhanced post-operative pain control, showcasing its effectiveness in improving outcomes for Bier's block procedures. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine enhances Bier's block with xylocaine, providing faster onset, extended motor block, and superior post-operative analgesia for upper limb surgery.

Regional versus systemic dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to lidocaine for intravenous regional anaesthesia in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study

Background Dexmedetomidine enhances the quality and duration of lidocaine intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA). However, the two administration routes have not been directly compared regarding effects on tourniquet tolerance time with lidocaine IVRA. Additionally, it remains unclear whether the prolonged tourniquet tolerance stems from the direct peripheral action of dexmedetomidine or indirect systemic analgesic effects. Methods We conducted forearm IVRA in 12 healthy volunteers using a crossover design on two separate study days. One day, the systemic dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous infusion of 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (20 mL) in one arm, followed by 0.5% lidocaine (25 mL) forearm IVRA in the contralateral arm. On the other day, the regional dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous 0.9% saline infusion (20 mL) in one arm, followed by combined 0.5% lidocaine (25 mL) and 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine forearm IVRA in the opposite arm. After a two-week washout period, participants crossed over to receive the alternate treatment. The primary outcome was tourniquet tolerance time, from initiating IVRA until the patient-reported tourniquet pain numerical rating scale exceeded three. Results The tourniquet tolerance time was longer with regional versus systemic dexmedetomidine (36.9 ± 7.6 min vs 23.3 ± 6.2 min, respectively), with a 13.6 min mean difference (95% CI: 10.8 to 16.4 min, p < 0.001). Regional dexmedetomidine also hastened sensory onset and extended sensory recovery compared to systemic administration. Delayed sedation after tourniquet release occurred in 5 of 12 subjects receiving regional dexmedetomidine. Conclusion The addition of regional dexmedetomidine to lidocaine prolonged tourniquet tolerance time in forearm IVRA to a greater extent compared to systemic dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300067978.

Single-center experience of cubital tunnel syndrome surgery performing transposition or internal neurolysis with external decompression under regional intravenous anesthesia technique

Aims: To share the 7-year experience of a single center in the application of regional intravenous anesthesia (RIVA) for surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CTS) caused by compression of the ulnar nerve in the elbow region.&#x0D; Methods: A total of 100 patients with CTS who were operated with the RIVA technique at a single center between 2012 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. In the RIVA technique, after providing venous drainage in the operated side arm, the double cuff tourniquet was inflated in the upper arm, and anesthesia was provided by administering a 30-40 mL solution of 2% lidocaine (3 mg/kg) diluted in 1% saline through the intravenous catheter. The surgical methods applied (transposition or internal neurolysis with external decompression), demographic data, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain were compared.&#x0D; Results: Out of 100 patients, 30 patients underwent surgical transposition (group 1) while internal neurolysis with external decompression was performed in 70 patients (group 2). The mean age of patients in groups 1 and 2 was 66.3±12.1 and 60.6±11.7 years, respectively. Women accounted for 73.3% of patients in group 1 and 87.1% of patients in group 2. The left side was affected in 18 (60%) patients in group 1 and 42 (60%) patients in group 2. In group 1, the mean postoperative 3rd-week VAS score (1.96±0.76) was significantly lower than the mean preoperative VAS score (7.46±0.93; p

Analgesic Techniques for Managing Orthopedic Injuries: A Review for the Emergency Clinician

BackgroundOrthopedic injuries are commonly managed in the emergency department (ED) setting. Fractures and dislocations may require reduction for proper management. There are a variety of analgesic and sedative strategies to provide patient comfort during reduction. ObjectiveThis narrative review evaluates hematoma block, intra-articular injection, intravenous regional analgesia (IVRA) (also known as the Bier block), and periosteal block for orthopedic analgesia in the ED setting. DiscussionAnalgesia is an essential component of management of orthopedic injuries, particularly when reduction is necessary. Options in the ED setting include hematoma blocks, intra-articular injections, IVRA, and periosteal blocks, which provide adequate analgesia without procedural sedation or opioid administration. When used in isolation, these analgesic techniques decrease complications from sedation and the need for other medications, such as opioids, while decreasing ED length of stay. Emergency clinicians can also use these techniques as analgesic adjuncts. However, training in these techniques is recommended prior to routine use, particularly with IVRA. ConclusionsKnowledge of analgesic techniques for orthopedic procedures can assist clinicians in optimizing patient care.

Comparison of lidocaine and its combination with ketamine for distal intravenous regional anesthesia (DIVRA) in bovines

The hoof diseases of cattle can be managed surgically under intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). For routine induction of IVRA, a tourniquet is placed circumferentially at the metacarpus/metatarsus. In the present study, hoof diseases of cattle were corrected using a modified IVRA technique. The cattle with hoof ailments were randomly divided into two groups and a tourniquet was placed just distal to the dew claws instead of at the metacarpus/metatarsus in order to decrease the dose of anesthetic. In group I lidocaine (2mg/kg) and in group II a mixture of lidocaine and ketamine (2mg/kg+1.5mg/kg) was injected into the axial digital vein to induce distal intravenous regional anesthesia (DIVRA). The heart rate, respiration rate, systolic and diastolic pressure were unaffected in both groups. Oxygen saturation was significantly (P&lt;0.05) lower between 5 and 60 minutes in group I and between 15and 40 minutes in group II animals. The sensory and motor block onset time was shorter, and the sensory and motor block recovery time was longer in group II animals as compared to group I animals. It was concluded that the DIVRA technique using lidocaine alone and lidocaine admixed with ketamine are suitable for hoof examination and surgery.

Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Trauma Pain in Older Adults.

In the context of an ageing population, the demographic sands of trauma are shifting. Increasingly, trauma units are serving older adults who have sustained injuries in low-energy falls from a standing height. Older age is commonly associated with changes in physiology, as well as an increased prevalence of frailty and multimorbidity, including cardiac, renal and liver disease. These factors can complicate the safe and effective administration of analgesia in the older trauma patient. Trauma services therefore need to adapt to meet this demographic shift and ensure that trauma clinicians are sufficiently skilled in treating pain in complex older people. This article is dedicated to the management of acute trauma pain in older adults. It aims to highlight the notable clinical challenges of managing older trauma patients compared with their younger counterparts. It offers an overview of the evidence and practical opinion on the merits and drawbacks of commonly used analgesics, as well as more novel and emerging analgesic adjuncts. A search of Medline (Ovid, from inception to 7 November 2022) was conducted by a medical librarian to identifyrelevant articles using keyword and subject heading terms for trauma, pain, older adults and analgesics. Results were limited to articles published in the last 10years andEnglish language. Relevant articles' references were hand-screened to identify other relevant articles. There is paucity of dedicated high-quality evidence to guide management of trauma-related pain in older adults. Ageing-related changes in physiology, the accumulation of multimorbidity, frailty and the risk of inducing delirium secondary to analgesic medication present a suite of challenges in the older trauma patient. An important nuance of treating pain in older trauma patients is the challenge of balancing iatrogenic adverse effects of analgesia against the harms of undertreated pain, the complications and consequences of which include immobility, pneumonia, sarcopenia, pressure ulcers, long-term functional decline, increased long-term care needs and mortality. In this article, the role of non-opioid agents including short-course non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is discussed. Opioid selection and dosing are reviewed for older adults suffering from acute trauma pain in the context of kidney and liver disease. The evidence base and limitations of other adjuncts such as topical and intravenous lidocaine, ketamine and regional anaesthesia in acute geriatric trauma are discussed.

Mini-dose Bier's block vssystemic analgesia in distal radius fractures: a promising reduction in emergency department throughput time.

Aim: This study compared the effect of the conventional technique of procedural sedation and the mini-dose intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). Patients & methods: 45 patients received IVRA, and 47 received iv. ketamine. The pain score, emergency department (ED) length of stay and patients' satisfaction were compared. Results: The study revealed that not only the levels of hemodynamic parameters but also their stability, and the patient's satisfaction in the IVRA group were significantly better. The patients' pain score and ED length of stay were also significantly decreased in those who received IVRA. Conclusion: Mini-dose IVRA technique contributes to better hemodynamic stability, without prominent adverse events, and leads to significant pain control and improved ED throughput time. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03349216 (ClinicalTrials.gov).