PHILOSOPHICAL arguments are seldom settled by numbers. In the case of drug abusers and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), many public health experts say the numbers support their view that, in the absence of effective means to eliminate intravenous (IV) substance abuse, the next best thing is to help addicts inject more safely. Opponents say that distributing free needles and syringes will encourage drug use and send the wrong message at a time when the nation appears increasingly concerned about the impact of illicit substance abuse. After numerous false starts, two cities in this country—New York and Portland, Ore—are poised to put the issue to the test. But given the politically charged environment, it is far from certain that the results of those tests will change minds. They may save lives, though. As many as 4.5 million men and women are "in the direct line of fire"—as IV drug users or
Read full abstract