Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Research Articles

Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background The randomized, controlled FLAVOUR trial demonstrated that the clinical outcomes of the fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy were non-inferior to the intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI strategy. Purpose This study aimed to compare the difference in economic implications and health-related quality of life between the two strategies. Methods A total of 890 patients with intermediate stenosis in 9 sites in China from the FLAVOUR trial were included. Direct medical costs were calculated using a combination of resource-based and event-based methods. Health utility was defined as quality-adjusted life years and assessed based on the 19-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire. The primary analysis was a cost-utility analysis. Probabilistic sensitivity, one-way sensitivity, and subgroup analyses were performed. Results At two years, the average total cost per patient was Chinese yuan (CNY) 36,287±19,531 in the IVUS-guided group and CNY 29,237±19,239 in the FFR-guided group (ΔIVUS-FFR=CNY 7,050, p<0.001). The difference was driven primarily by the cost of initial admission (ΔIVUS-FFR=CNY 6,284, p<0.001). Quality-adjusted life years gained showed no significant differences between the two groups (FFR vs. IVUS: 1.639±0.086 years vs. 1.638±0.128 years, p=0.872). The probabilistic sensitivity and one-way sensitivity analyses revealed robust results. The subgroup analysis found that the cost reductions attributed to FFR guidance decreased in several subgroups, including patients with diabetes and those with high anatomical complexity. Conclusions In patients with intermediate stenosis, FFR-guided PCI is associated with significant cost savings compared with IVUS-guided PCI at two years and shows no differences in health-related quality of life outcomes.Central Illustration

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock

Abstract Background Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) potentially improves short and long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, evidence regarding its efficacy in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is limited. Objectives This study investigated the impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with AMI and CS. Methods From the pooled data based on a series of Korean AMI registries during 2011–2020, we identified 1,418 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with second generation drug-eluting stent (DES) for AMI and CS. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization. Results Among the patients, 294 (20.7%) and 1,124 (79.3%) underwent IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI with second generation DES implantation, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the 1-year TLF between both groups after IPTW analysis (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.65–1.34, p=0.70) (Figure A). Additionally, the adjusted landmark analysis for TLF at 30 days and between 30 days and 1 year after PCI demonstrated no significant difference between the groups (Figure B). Conclusions In patients with AMI and CS who underwent PCI with second-generation DES, IVUS-guided PCI did not improve clinical outcomes with respect to 1-year TLF compared with angiography-guided PCI.Figure

Zero-contrast intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with high-risk iodinated contrast allergy: navigating in the dark through a brighter inner light.

Zero-contrast intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with high-risk iodinated contrast allergy: navigating in the dark through a brighter inner light.

TCT-529 Major Adverse Periprocedural Events Following Optical Coherence Tomographic Versus Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

TCT-529 Major Adverse Periprocedural Events Following Optical Coherence Tomographic Versus Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Optical frequency domain imaging-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: the OPINION ACS randomised trial.

The clinical benefits of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain unclear. We sought to compare intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- and OFDI-guided PCI in patients with ACS. OPINION ACS is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial that compared OFDI-guided PCI with IVUS-guided PCI using current-generation drug-eluting stents in ACS patients (n=158). The primary endpoint was in-stent minimum lumen area (MLA), assessed using 8-month follow-up OFDI. Patients presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (55%), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (29%), or unstable angina pectoris (16%). PCI procedural success was achieved in all patients, with comparably low periprocedural complications rates in both groups. Immediately after PCI, the minimum stent area (p=0.096) tended to be smaller for OFDI versus IVUS guidance. Proximal stent edge dissection (p=0.012) and irregular protrusion (p=0.03) were significantly less frequent in OFDI-guided procedures than in IVUS-guided procedures. Post-PCI coronary flow, assessed using corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame counts, was significantly better in the OFDI-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (p<0.001). The least squares mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) in-stent MLA at 8 months was 4.91 (95% CI: 4.53-5.30) mm2 and 4.76 (95% CI: 4.35-5.17) mm2 in the OFDI- and IVUS-guided groups, respectively, demonstrating the non-inferiority of OFDI guidance (pnon-inferiority<0.001). The average neointima area tended to be smaller in the OFDI-guided group. The frequency of major adverse cardiac events was similar. Among ACS patients, OFDI-guided PCI and IVUS-guided PCI were equally safe and feasible, with comparable in-stent MLA at 8 months. OFDI guidance may be a potential option in ACS patients. This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jrct.niph.go.jp: jRCTs052190093).

Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease and Diabetes

There is a scarcity of data on clinical outcomes after intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel disease and diabetes. OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolling 1021 patients who underwent multivessel PCI including left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS aiming to meet the prespecified OPTIVUS criteria for optimal stent expansion. We compared the clinical outcomes between those patients with and without diabetes. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. There were 560 patients (54.8%) with diabetes, and 461 patients (45.2%) without diabetes. Mean age was not different between the 2 groups (70.9±9.7 years versus 71.7±10.4 years, P=0.17). Patients with diabetes more often had chronic kidney disease and complex coronary artery disease as indicated by the greater total number of stents and longer total stent length. The rate of meeting OPTIVUS criteria was not different between the 2 groups (61.2% vs. 60.7%, P=0.83). The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint was not different between the 2 groups (10.8% versus 9.8%, log-rank P=0.65). After adjusting confounders, the risk of diabetes relative to non-diabetes remained insignificant for the primary endpoint (HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.65-1.44; P=0.88).In conclusion, in patients who underwent multivessel IVUS-guided PCI, and were managed with contemporary clinical practice, patients with diabetes had similar 1-year outcomes compared with patients without diabetes.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies

Abstract 1108: Sex And Racial Differences In The Outcomes Of Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Five-year Retrospective Analysis

Introduction: Studies have shown the superiority of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (IVUS-PCI) over angiographic PCI alone. We studied the racial and sex differences in outcomes. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample database (2016-2020) and ICD-10 codes, we identified the IVUS-PCI population. Chi-square and student T-tests were used to compare categorical and mean differences. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to account for potential confounding variables such as sex, age, comorbidities, hospital size, and teaching status and to estimate the probability of outcomes. Our primary outcome was mortality. A p≤0.05 was significant. Results: Of the 271,530 PCI hospitalizations, 12% (32,675) got IVUS-PCI (63.7 years ± 11.7), of which 30.4% (9,925) were females. The probability of receiving IVUS-PCI was similar among all races: 1.04 (0.9-1.1, p=0.7) and sex 1.01 (0.9-1.03, p=0.6). Compared to Whites, Blacks 0.8 (0.6-1.2), Hispanics 0.9 (0.7-1.4), and Asians 1.3 (0.8-2.2), (p&gt;0.05, each) did not differ in mortality. Also, no sex differences in mortality, with females 1.2 (1.0-1.5, p&gt;0.05). Post-procedural shock 2.5 (1.5-4.0), bleeding 1.8 (1.3-2.6), and anemia 1.5 (1.3-1.8) (p&lt;0.05, each) were more likely in females. No racial differences were noted. Conclusion: In our IVUS-PCI population, there was no difference in mortality among race or sex. However, females were more likely to suffer peri and post-procedural complications. More research is needed to identify the drivers of these disparities.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

The benefits of intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the clinical context of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction are lacking. We aimed to investigate the impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with AMI and CS. From the pooled data based on a series of Korean AMI registries during 2011-2020, we identified 1418 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with second generation drug-eluting stent (DES) for AMI and CS. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization. In total, 294 (20.7%) and 1124 (79.3%) underwent IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI with second generation DES implantation, respectively. The 1-year TLF was not significantly different between groups after IPTW analysis (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.65-1.34, p = 0.70). Additionally, the adjusted landmark analysis for TLF at 30days and between 30days and 1year after PCI demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. In conclusion, in patients with AMI and CS who underwent PCI with second-generation DES, IVUS-guided PCI did not improve the 1-year TLF compared with angiography-guided PCI.Registration: URL: http://cris.nih.go.kr . KCT0000863 and KCT0008355.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes (IVUS-ACS): a two-stage, multicentre, randomised trial

Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention has been shown to result in superior clinical outcomes compared with angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. However, insufficient data are available concerning the advantages of intravascular ultrasound guidance for patients with an acute coronary syndrome. This trial aimed to investigate whether the use of intravascular ultrasound guidance, as compared with angiography guidance, improves the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug-eluting stents in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome. In this two-stage, multicentre, randomised trial, patients aged 18 years or older and presenting with an acute coronary syndrome at 58 centres in China, Italy, Pakistan, and the UK were randomly assigned to intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention or angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients, follow-up health-care providers, and assessors were masked to random assignment; however, staff in the catheterisation laboratory were not. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularisation at 1 year after randomisation. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03971500, and is completed. Between Aug 20, 2019 and Oct 27, 2022, 3505 patients with an acute coronary syndrome were randomly assigned to intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1753) or angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1752). 1-year follow-up was completed in 3504 (>99·9%) patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 70 patients in the intravascular ultrasound group and 128 patients in the angiography group (Kaplan-Meier rate 4·0% vs 7·3%; hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·41-0·74]; p=0·0001), driven by reductions in target vessel myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularisation. There were no significant differences in all-cause death or stent thrombosis between groups. Safety endpoints were also similar in the two groups. In patients with an acute coronary syndrome, intravascular ultrasound-guided implantation of contemporary drug-eluting stents resulted in a lower 1-year rate of the composite outcome of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven revascularisation compared with angiography guidance alone. The Chinese Society of Cardiology, the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China, and Jiangsu Provincial & Nanjing Municipal Clinical Trial Project. For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Acute Kidney Injury After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guided by Intravascular Ultrasound.

Purpose We investigated the impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on reducing the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort who were not randomly assigned to angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention or intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. The patients were hospitalized at the Vietnam National Heart Institute - Bach Mai Hospital between 2019 and 2020. Acute kidney injury incidence during hospitalization was the primary endpoint. Results A total of 99 patients were divided into two groups: the intravascular ultrasound-guided group (33 participants) and the angiography-guided group (66 participants). The mean ± SD contrast volume of each group was 95.2 ± 37.1 mL and 133.0 ± 36.0 mL for the ultrasound-guided and angiography-guided groups, with P < 0.0001. Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (IVUS-guided PCI) was associated with reduced acute kidney injury incidence during hospitalization: 0.0% vs. 12.12% and P = 0.049. Conclusions Intravascular ultrasound is a safe imaging tool that guides percutaneous coronary intervention and significantly reduces the rate of acute kidney injury compared to angiography alone. Patients who have a high chance of experiencing acute kidney injury benefit from using intravascular ultrasound.

Intravascular imaging-guided coronary drug-eluting stent implantation: an updated network meta-analysis

Previous meta-analyses have shown reduced risks of composite adverse events with intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography guidance alone. However, these studies have been insufficiently powered to show whether all-cause death or all myocardial infarction are reduced with intravascular imaging guidance, and most previous intravascular imaging studies were done with intravascular ultrasound rather than optical coherence tomography (OCT), a newer imaging modality. We aimed to assess the comparative performance of intravascular imaging-guided PCI and angiography-guided PCI with drug-eluting stents. For this systematic review and updated meta-analysis, we searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to Aug 30, 2023, for studies that randomly assigned patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents either to intravascular ultrasound or OCT, or both, or to angiography alone to guide the intervention. The searches were done and study-level data were extracted independently by two investigators. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or target lesion revascularisation, assessed in patients randomly assigned to intravascular imaging guidance (intravascular ultrasound or OCT) versus angiography guidance. We did a standard frequentist meta-analysis to generate direct data, and a network meta-analysis to generate indirect data and overall treatment effects. Outcomes were expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs at the longest reported follow-up duration. This study was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO, number CRD42023455662). 22 trials were identified in which 15 964 patients were randomised and followed for a weighted mean duration of 24·7 months (longest duration of follow-up in each study ranging from 6 to 60 months). Compared with angiography-guided PCI, intravascular imaging-guided PCI resulted in a decreased risk of target lesion failure (RR 0·71 [95% CI 0·63-0·80]; p<0·0001), driven by reductions in the risks of cardiac death (RR 0·55 [95% CI 0·41-0·75]; p=0·0001), TV-MI (RR 0·82 [95% CI 0·68-0·98]; p=0·030), and target lesion revascularisation (RR 0·72 [95% CI 0·60-0·86]; p=0·0002). Intravascular imaging guidance also reduced the risks of stent thrombosis (RR 0·52 [95% CI 0·34-0·81]; p=0·0036), all myocardial infarction (RR 0·83 [95% CI 0·71-0·99]; p=0·033), and all-cause death (RR 0·75 [95% CI 0·60-0·93]; p=0·0091). Outcomes were similar for OCT-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided PCI. Compared with angiography guidance, intravascular imaging guidance of coronary stent implantation with OCT or intravascular ultrasound enhances both the safety and effectiveness of PCI, reducing the risks of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularisation, and stent thrombosis. Abbott.

Optical coherence tomography-guided vs. intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are superior to coronary angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, whether one technique is superior to the other is inconclusive. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to November 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OCT and IVUS in patients undergoing PCI. RevMan 5.4 was used to pool outcomes with risk ratio (RR) as the effect measure. Six RCTs (4,402 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the OCT- and IVUS-guided PCI groups in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.65, 1.16; I2 = 0%) and cardiac mortality (RR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.24, 2.21; I2 = 0%). The results were consistent across the subgroups of the presence or absence of left main disease (P interaction >0.1). There were no significant differences between OCT and IVUS in the risk of target lesion revascularization (RR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.30; I2 = 0%), target vessel revascularization (RR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.62; I2 = 0%), target-vessel myocardial infarction (RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.40, 1.53; I2 = 0%), stent thrombosis (RR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.12, 2.97; I2 = 0%), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.53, 1.90; I2 = 0%). Our meta-analysis demonstrated similar clinical outcomes in OCT- and IVUS-guided PCI. New large-scale multicenter RCTs with long-term follow-up are required to confirm or refute our findings and provide more reliable results. PROSPERO, identifier, CRD42023486933.

Optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Introduction and objectivesOptical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) yields clinical outcomes comparable to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. However, there is a scarcity of data comparing the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for patients with AMI in the era of second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES). MethodsWe identified 5260 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with a second-generation DES for AMI under IVUS or OCT guidance from pooled data derived from a series of Korean AMI registries between 2011 and 2020. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. ResultsA total of 535 (10.2%) and 4725 (89.8%) patients were treated under OCT and IVUS guidance, respectively. The 1-year target lesion failure rates were comparable between the OCT and IVUS groups before and after propensity score matching (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.42-2.05, P=.84). The OCT utilization rate did not exceed 5% of total patients treated with second-generation DES implantation during the study period. The primary factors for the selection of OCT over IVUS were the absence of chronic kidney disease, non-left main vessel disease, single-vessel disease, stent diameter <3mm, and stent length ≤ 25mm. ConclusionsOCT-guided PCI in patients with AMI treated with a second-generation DES provided comparable clinical outcomes for 1-year target lesion failure compared with IVUS-guided PCI.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration After Multivessel Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

There is a scarcity of data evaluating contemporary real-world dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort enrolling 982 patients undergoing multivessel PCI, including left anterior descending coronary artery using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), we conducted 90-day landmark analyses to compare shorter and longer DAPT. DAPT discontinuation was defined as withdrawal of P2Y12inhibitors or aspirin for at least 2 months. The prevalence of acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium were 14.2% and 52.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of DAPT discontinuation was 22.6% at 90 days, and 68.8% at 1 year. In the 90-day landmark analyses, there were no differences in the incidences of a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization (5.9% vs. 9.2%, log-rank P=0.12; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-1.08; P=0.09) and BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding (1.4% vs. 1.9%, log-rank P=0.62) between the off- and on-DAPT groups at 90 days. The adoption of short DAPT duration was still low in this trial conducted after the release of the STOPDAPT-2 trial results. The 1-year incidence of cardiovascular events was not different between the shorter and longer DAPT groups, suggesting no apparent benefit of prolonged DAPT in reducing cardiovascular events even in patients who undergo multivessel PCI.

TCT-696 Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

TCT-696 Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed superior clinical outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, the comparative effectiveness of OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI regarding clinical outcomes is unknown. In this prospective, multicenter, open-label, pragmatic trial, we randomly assigned 2008 patients with significant coronary artery lesions undergoing PCI in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either an OCT-guided or IVUS-guided PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year, which was powered for noninferiority of the OCT group compared with the IVUS group. Safety outcomes were also assessed. At 1 year, primary end point events occurred in 25 of 1005 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 2.5%) in the OCT group and in 31 of 1003 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 3.1%) in the IVUS group (absolute difference, -0.6 percentage points; upper boundary of one-sided 97.5% CI, 0.97 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar (14 patients [1.4%] in the OCT group versus 15 patients [1.5%] in the IVUS group; P=0.85). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT group than in the IVUS group (22 [2.2%] versus 37 [3.7%]; P=0.047), although imaging procedure-related complications were not observed. In patients with significant coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI was noninferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to the incidence of a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year. The selected study population and lower-than-expected event rates should be considered in interpreting the trial. URL: https://www. gov; Unique number: NCT03394079.

Safety and feasibility of intravascular ultrasound-guided robotic percutaneous coronary intervention.

Previous studies have demonstrated the benefit of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for preventing longitudinal geographic miss (LGM). However, it is yet unclear whether IVUS guidance is useful for robotic-PCI (robotic-assisted perctaneous coronary intervention [R-PCI]). A total of 58 consecutive patients with stable angina who underwent IVUS-guided R-PCI were enrolled. The stent landing position was angiographically marked using a balloon marker before stenting, followed by measurements of the expected stent length using balloon pullback. Subsequently, prestenting IVUS was performed to determine stent landing. All pre-PCI IVUS images were assessed for lesion length and percent plaque volume (%PV) using both IVUS and angiographic marking. LGM was defined as a residual %PV >50% at either the distal or proximal stent edge, any stent edge dissection, or additional stent deployment immediately after stenting. The included patients had an average age of 67.1 ± 10.1 years. IVUS guidance had significantly longer lesion lengths compared with angiographic marking. Based on IVUS-guided stent deployment, nine cases exhibited LGM immediately after stenting. IVUS-marked landing points had a significantly smaller %PV and significantly larger lumen area compared with those for angiography. IVUS-guided R-PCI was well-tolerated and may be better at preventing LGM compared with angiography-guided R-PCI.

Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes. However, data on outcomes of IVUS-guided PCI in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is scarce. Therefore, we sought to study the utilization rate and outcomes of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with ACS. Using the National Readmission database, we identified all patients with ACS who underwent PCI from 2016 to 2019. We used a 1:1 propensity-matched analysis to compare the outcome of patients with ACS who underwent PCI with and without IVUS. In 1,263,997 patients with ACS, 563,521 (44.6%) underwent PCI without IVUS and 40,095 (3.17%) underwent IVUS-guided PCI. A Propensity scored matched comparison of PCI with and without IVUS showed IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.85, p <0.01) compared with PCI without IVUS. The utilization of IVUS increased from 2.64% in 2016 to 4.10% in 2019, p <0.001. In conclusion, IVUS-guided PCI is associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with ACS, yet the current utilization of IVUS-guided PCI remains low across the United States.