Intrauterine Device Placement Research Articles

7019 Persistently Elevated Estradiol Levels in a Transgender Male; An Unexpected Pregnancy

Abstract Disclosure: M. Kanin: None. S. Grock: None. N. Agrawal: None. Background: Testosterone is the backbone of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for transmasculine and non-binary individuals assigned female at birth (AFAB). While testosterone can affect fertility, it should not be used as contraception and is contraindicated in pregnancy. It is important to counsel patients on fertility preservation, pregnancy, and contraceptive options prior to testosterone initiation. However, the Endocrine Society Guidelines and World Professional Association for Transgender Health Standards of Care provide minimal guidance on reproductive health and contraceptive options. Case Description: An 18-year-old individual AFAB on GAHT with testosterone was referred to endocrinology for elevated estradiol levels. On presentation, the patient denied vaginal bleeding or breast tenderness. The date of last menstrual period was reported as two years prior. There was no significant past medical or surgical history. Medications included subcutaneous testosterone cypionate 20 mg weekly. Physical exam was notable for elevated BMI 42.6kg/m², mild facial hair and central adiposity. Hormone analysis revealed testosterone of 172 ng/dL (adult male: 200-1000) and estradiol 27,322 pg/mL (mid-cycle Female: 80-400). Estradiol by mass spectrometry obtained due to concern for immunoassay interference resulted at > 10,000 pg/mL. FSH <0.1 mIU/mL, LH<0.1 mIU/mL, DHEA-S 2,460 ng/mL (adult female: 400-3600), androstenedione 1.85 ng/mL (0.260 - 2.140), prolactin 328 ng/mL (3 -23.1). CT abdomen and pelvis and pituitary MRI were ordered to assess for ovarian, adrenal and/or pituitary tumor. Later that day additional laboratory tests revealed alpha fetoprotein 126 ng/mL (0 -6.7), progesterone 100.2 ng/mL (luteal phase: 3.0-25.0), beta-hCG 32,571 mIU/ml, inhibin B<10, inhibin A 500.1pg/ml (luteal phase: 40-80) and CA-125 19 U/mL (0 - 35). Given the elevated beta-hcg the patient was asked if they were having sex in a way that could result in pregnancy to which they answered affirmatively. CT and MRI were cancelled, and abdominal ultrasound was obtained which revealed a single living intrauterine pregnancy with estimated gestational age 35 weeks 2 days. Testosterone was stopped and they subsequently delivered a healthy baby girl. Conclusion: Gender diverse patients on testosterone can experience unplanned pregnancy. As testosterone is contraindicated in pregnancy, counseling on reproductive health and contraception is needed. A pregnancy test should be considered prior to initiating hormones for appropriate individuals. It is important to be aware that Individuals AFAB may not desire estrogen containing birth control and placement of intrauterine devices can be dysphoric. Further investigation into how contraceptive options may affect outcomes for individuals on GAHT is needed to minimize barriers to care and to enable patients to make well informed decisions. Presentation: 6/2/2024

7019 Persistently Elevated Estradiol Levels in a Transgender Male; An Unexpected Pregnancy

Abstract Disclosure: M. Kanin: None. S. Grock: None. N. Agrawal: None. Background: Testosterone is the backbone of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for transmasculine and non-binary individuals assigned female at birth (AFAB). While testosterone can affect fertility, it should not be used as contraception and is contraindicated in pregnancy. It is important to counsel patients on fertility preservation, pregnancy, and contraceptive options prior to testosterone initiation. However, the Endocrine Society Guidelines and World Professional Association for Transgender Health Standards of Care provide minimal guidance on reproductive health and contraceptive options. Case Description: An 18-year-old individual AFAB on GAHT with testosterone was referred to endocrinology for elevated estradiol levels. On presentation, the patient denied vaginal bleeding or breast tenderness. The date of last menstrual period was reported as two years prior. There was no significant past medical or surgical history. Medications included subcutaneous testosterone cypionate 20 mg weekly. Physical exam was notable for elevated BMI 42.6kg/m², mild facial hair and central adiposity. Hormone analysis revealed testosterone of 172 ng/dL (adult male: 200-1000) and estradiol 27,322 pg/mL (mid-cycle Female: 80-400). Estradiol by mass spectrometry obtained due to concern for immunoassay interference resulted at > 10,000 pg/mL. FSH <0.1 mIU/mL, LH<0.1 mIU/mL, DHEA-S 2,460 ng/mL (adult female: 400-3600), androstenedione 1.85 ng/mL (0.260 - 2.140), prolactin 328 ng/mL (3 -23.1). CT abdomen and pelvis and pituitary MRI were ordered to assess for ovarian, adrenal and/or pituitary tumor. Later that day additional laboratory tests revealed alpha fetoprotein 126 ng/mL (0 -6.7), progesterone 100.2 ng/mL (luteal phase: 3.0-25.0), beta-hCG 32,571 mIU/ml, inhibin B<10, inhibin A 500.1pg/ml (luteal phase: 40-80) and CA-125 19 U/mL (0 - 35). Given the elevated beta-hcg the patient was asked if they were having sex in a way that could result in pregnancy to which they answered affirmatively. CT and MRI were cancelled, and abdominal ultrasound was obtained which revealed a single living intrauterine pregnancy with estimated gestational age 35 weeks 2 days. Testosterone was stopped and they subsequently delivered a healthy baby girl. Conclusion: Gender diverse patients on testosterone can experience unplanned pregnancy. As testosterone is contraindicated in pregnancy, counseling on reproductive health and contraception is needed. A pregnancy test should be considered prior to initiating hormones for appropriate individuals. It is important to be aware that Individuals AFAB may not desire estrogen containing birth control and placement of intrauterine devices can be dysphoric. Further investigation into how contraceptive options may affect outcomes for individuals on GAHT is needed to minimize barriers to care and to enable patients to make well informed decisions. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device placement without uterine sounding: A feasibility study

ObjectivesTo evaluate feasibility of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device (IUD) placement without uterine sounding. Study designWe performed a three-phase feasibility study from February 2023-May 2024. In phase one, participants had levonorgestrel 52 mg IUD placement with sounding. In the experimental phases, placement occurred without sounding and with (phase two) or without (phase three) concurrent transabdominal sonography and participants had 3-month follow-up. We defined feasibility as successful IUD placement without uterine sounding based on ultrasound confirmation. We measured total instrumentation time from the sound or inserter touching the cervix to inserter removal. Participants reported maximal pain experienced using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale when the inserter was removed. We calculated a sample size of 30 per phase so that if there was one failed placement, the lower 95% confidence interval of the successful placement rate would be no less than 90.0%. ResultsSuccessful placement without sounding occurred in 30(100%) participants in phase two and 28(93.3%) in phase three. Median instrumentation was longest in phase one (49.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 42.3–55.0] seconds) compared to phases two (16.0 [IQR12.0–28.0] seconds, p < 0.0001) and three (25.0 [IQR 18.5–32.2] seconds, p < 0.0001). Participants’ median placement pain was 21.0 (IQR 10.3–32.8) mm in phase one with no difference in phase two (25.5 [IQR 14.3–47.0] mm, p = 0.35), but was higher in phase three (36.0 [IQR 22.8, 61.0] mm, p = 0.01). ConclusionsLevonorgestrel 52 mg IUD placement without sounding is feasible with concurrent sonography. Placement without sounding results in shorter instrumentation time but does not decrease maximum placement pain.

Regional variation in health care substitution for intrauterine device insertion: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundRising health care costs are a major concern in most Western countries. The substitution of healthcare stands as a strategic approach aimed at mitigating costs while offering medical services in proximity to patients’ residences. An illustrative instance involves the migration of outpatient hospital care to primary care settings. Notably, the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUDs) can be safely executed within primary care contexts. In order to establish a pragmatic objective for the rate of IUD substitution, we conducted an evaluation of regional disparities in healthcare substitution pertaining to the insertion of intrauterine devices. Furthermore, we investigated disparities in the follow-up ultrasound and reinsertion of IUDs between primary and secondary healthcare environments.MethodsAll women who underwent IUD insertion in Dutch primary care (by general practitioners and midwives) and secondary care (by hospital physicians) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 were included. The main outcome measures were the case-mix adjusted IUD insertion rates at the regional level by care setting and the proportions requiring follow-up ultrasound and IUD reinsertion within three months.ResultsOf the 840,766 IUD placements, 74% were inserted in primary care and 26% in secondary care. The proportion inserted in primary care increased from 70% in 2016 to 77% in 2020. The observed substitution rate ranged from 58 to 82% between regions. Compared with health care professionals in primary care, those in secondary care performed more ultrasounds to verify IUD placement (23% vs. 3%; p-value < 0.01) and more IUD reinsertions within three months (6% vs. 2%; p-value < 0.01).ConclusionsIUDs are increasingly being inserted in Dutch primary care, with peak regional IUD insertion care substitution rates at ≥ 80%. IUD insertion care substitution to primary care appears to be associated with significantly fewer women having follow-up ultrasound or IUD reinsertion within three months.

U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024.

The 2024 U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. SPR) addresses a selected group of common, yet sometimes complex, issues regarding initiation and use of specific contraceptive methods. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. SPR (CDC. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016;65[No. RR-4]:1-66). Notable updates include 1) updated recommendations for provision of medications for intrauterine device placement, 2) updated recommendations for bleeding irregularities during implant use, 3) new recommendations for testosterone use and risk for pregnancy, and 4) new recommendations for self-administration of injectable contraception. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Abdominal Pregnancy Implanted on the Ileocecal Junction

We report a case of a 32-year-old gravida 1 para 0 with a copper intrauterine device in place and a newly diagnosed pregnancy at 5 weeks gestation. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was 23,940 mIU/mL and transvaginal ultrasound demonstrated a presumed right adnexal ectopic pregnancy with fetal cardiac activity. Upon laparoscopic entry, a 3 cm vascular mass consistent with ectopic pregnancy was noted densely adherent to the cecum, adjacent to the ileocecal junction. Given difficult tissue plane dissection and bleeding, a 4 cm mini-laparotomy was made and the mass was bluntly dissected away from the bowel implantation site. The bowel was oversewn. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated.

Hormone-related side effects in new users of a levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device

Although the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device is locally active and has low systemic hormone exposure, hormonal intrauterine device users sometimes report hormone-related side effects. Evaluate hormone-related adverse event rates among all participants and compare these among those who used combined hormonal or no hormonal contraception in the month before enrollment. A total of 1714 women aged 16-45 years old received a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device in a multicenter phase 3 trial to evaluate contraceptive efficacy and safety for up to 10 years. This analysis evaluated a subset of participants who used combined hormonal or no hormonal contraception in the month prior to device placement. We assessed all non-expulsion, non-bleeding-related events with ≥1% incidence at 180 days with a plan to include weight increase regardless of incidence; we excluded events considered non-hormonal. We computed 180-day side effect frequency rates based on the number of days a side effect was reported during the study period. We created a multivariable model for side effect incidence at 180 days based on age, race, ethnicity, body mass index at enrollment, parity, and contraception use in the month before enrollment. For those side effects with a p-value <0.2 on univariate comparison between combined-hormonal and no-hormonal contraception users, we secondarily evaluated 360-day event rates. Overall, 644 participants used combined hormonal contraception (primarily oral [n=499, 77.5%]) and 855 used no hormonal method before IUD placement. Individual side effect rates over the first 180 days did not differ between prior combined-hormonal and no-hormonal contraception users except for acne (84 [13.0%] versus 73 [8.5%], respectively), p=0.006, OR 1.61 (95% CI 1.15-2.24). However, this association was weaker after adjustment for age, race, ethnicity, obesity status, and parity (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.99-1.98) At 360 days, prior combined hormonal contraception users were more likely to report acne (101 [15.7%] vs. 91 [10.6%], respectively, p=0.005) and orgasm/libido problems (20 [3.1%] vs. 12 [1.4%], respectively, p=0.03). Over the first 180 days, all side effects other than acne were reported in less than 3% of days; acne was reported an average of 13 days (7.4%) per prior combined hormonal contraception user and 9 days (5.0%) per prior non-hormonal contraception user (p<0.0001). Discontinuation for evaluated side effects occurred in 83 (5.5%) participants with no difference between those who used combined hormonal (36 [5.6%]) or no hormonal contraception (47 [5.5%]), p=1.0) before study entry. Using combined hormonal contraception prior to levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device placement is only weakly associated with reporting hormonally related side effects like acne. Only a small percentage of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device users experienced potentially hormone-related side effects during the initial 6 months of use that resulted in discontinuation.

Patient Preferences for Immediate Compared With Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Placement.

To use choice-based conjoint survey methodology to evaluate patient values and decision making regarding immediate compared with delayed placement of postpartum intrauterine devices (IUDs). We conducted a cross-sectional study in which we surveyed 200 nonpregnant, parous patients. Participants chose between hypothetical postpartum IUDs varying in multiple attributes (hormonal or nonhormonal IUD type, placement timing, 1-year efficacy, expulsion risk, risk of lost strings, and malposition risk). The primary outcome was preference for immediate compared with delayed postpartum IUD placement and importance of placement timing relative to other attributes. Secondarily, we evaluated whether demographic and neighborhood characteristics were associated with timing preference and attribute importance. We included 190 participants for analysis. Most participants (62.6%) preferred delayed placement. There was no significant difference in timing preference by race ( P =.28) or block-level Area Deprivation Index score ( P =.27). Patients who preferred immediate placement were more likely to have public insurance than private insurance (70.4% vs 29.6%, P =.04); however, the majority of patients (55.1%) with public insurance still preferred delayed placement. Attributes of IUD type, malposition risk, 1-year efficacy, and expulsion risk all had greater effects on patient decision making than placement timing. There was no difference in attribute importance by race ( P =.30), Area Deprivation Index score ( P =.88), or insurance type ( P =.22). Patients preferred the higher efficacy and lower complication rates of delayed postpartum IUD placement over the convenience of immediate placement. Insurance considerations may affect these timing preferences. There was no difference in attribute importance between demographic groups or based on neighborhood-level factors, indicating that, although both immediate and delayed postpartum IUD placement should be offered, counseling should not vary according to individual demographic characteristics.

(044) AN INNOVATIVE AND NON-INVASIVE METHOD OF REDUCING PAIN UTILIZING VIBRATION DURING IUD INSERTION: PATIENT REACTIONS AND ONE PROVIDER’S APPROACH

Abstract Introduction Pain is commonly experienced during Intrauterine device (IUD) insertion and a possible barrier to this form of contraception. Pharmacological methods and non-pharmacological techniques are available to reduce pain during this procedure, but the efficacy varies on a case-by-case basis and data is conflicting regarding doses. Additional techniques are needed to increase the likelihood of a more patient centered approach to address pain experienced during IUD placement. Objective The purpose of the current project is to describe exploratory use of vibration and propose it as an innovative pain management technique during IUD insertion. Methods Recognizing that the umbilicus and the distal third of the vagina are embryologically connected, the current clinician hypothesized that external vibration applied to the umbilicus by a patient during IUD placement may reduce pain. Starting in 2017 external umbilical vibration was added to a previously established list of pain reduction options available during IUD placement at one clinical practice. Patients were consulted prior to IUD insertion and the list of multiple options discussed as part of regular practice. Patients and the provider determined the methods of pain reduction that best fit the individual patient’s needs based on their previous experiences, apprehension, and other concerns related to the procedure. Clinician observation and recall of response and reactions following the use of vibration will be shared. Results A detailed description of the umbilical vibration technique will be provided. Provider recall and summary of anonymous patient responses will be discussed, as well as the possible implications for gynecological care. Verbal and non-verbal responses from patients who elected to use umbilical vibration, or a combination of umbilical vibration and other techniques, to reduce pain have been overwhelmingly positive. No negative experiences with this non-invasive technique have occurred. Conclusions Umbilical vibration may serve as an effective, low-cost option to reduce pain during IUD placement. Providers considering this technique should be comfortable discussing vibration and open to this type of patient centered care. Umbilical vibration as a pain reduction technique for IUD insertion could be utilized in a trauma informed practice. A more in-depth study to further explore the intricacies of this technique is in preparation. Disclosure No.

Immediate and delayed placement of the intrauterine device after abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This article aims to report the comprehensive and up-to-date analysis and evidence of the insertion rate, expulsion rate, removal rate, and utilization rate of immediate placement of intrauterine devices (IUDs) versus delayed placement after artificial abortion. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were comprehensively searched up to January 12, 2024 for studies that compared immediate versus delayed insertion of IUDs after abortion. The evaluation metrics included the number of IUD insertion after surgical or medical abortions, the frequency of expulsion and removal at 6 months or 1 year, the number of continued usage, pain intensity scores, the number of infections, the duration of bleeding, and instances of uterine perforation during or after IUD insertion. Ten randomized controlled articles were eligible, comprising 11 research projects, of which 3 projects involved the placement of an IUD after surgical abortion, and 8 projects involved the placement of an IUD after medical abortion. This included 2025 patients (977 in the immediate insertion group and 1,048 in the delayed insertion group). We summarized all the extracted evidence. The meta-analysis results indicated that for post-surgical abortions, the immediate insertion group exhibited a higher IUD placement rate than the delayed insertion group. After medical abortions, the immediate insertion group showed higher rates of IUD placement, utilization, and expulsion at 6 months or 1 year. The two groups showed no statistically significant differences in the removal rate, post-insertion infection rate, pain scores during insertion, and days of bleeding during the follow-up period. Compared to delayed placement, immediate insertion of IUDs can not only increase the usage rate at 6 months or 1 year but also enhance the placement rate.

Mepivacaine instillation for pain reduction during intrauterine device placement in nulliparous women: a double-blinded randomized trial

BackgroundFear of pain associated with intrauterine device placement has been identified as a significant barrier to the adoption of long-acting reversible contraception, contributing to lower utilization of the most effective reversible contraceptive methods. ObjectiveTo assess whether instillation of intrauterine mepivacaine before intrauterine device placement alleviates pain more effectively than a placebo. Study DesignWe conducted a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving nulliparous women undergoing intrauterine device placement. An instillation of 10 mL of 20 mg/mL mepivacaine or 0.9 mg/mL sodium chloride was administrated through a hydrosonography catheter 2 minutes prior to intrauterine device placement. Pain scores were assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale at pre-specified time points. Primary outcome measured the difference in Visual Analog Scale pain scores between the intervention group and the placebo group during intrauterine device placement. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale pain scores at instillation and 10 minutes after placement, tolerability of the placement pain, as well as acceptability of the analgesia method. ResultsWe enrolled 151 participants, with 76 assigned to the mepivacaine group and 75 to the placebo group. The mean VAS pain score during IUD placement showed a difference of 13.3 mm (95% CI 5.75-20.87; P<.001): the mepivacaine group had a mean of 53.9 mm (SD 22.8), while the placebo group had a mean of 67.2 mm (SD 22.4). After adjusting for each individual provider’s impact, the difference in mean pain scores remained statistically significant (12.2 mm 95% CI 4.85-19.62; P<.001). A greater proportion of women in the intervention group reported tolerable pain during placement with 70/75 participants (93.3%) compared to 53/66 participants (80.3%) in the placebo group (P=.021). ConclusionThe intrauterine instillation of mepivacaine results in statistically significant reduction in pain score among nulliparous women during intrauterine device placement. Although the precise clinical impact of this pain reduction method remains uncertain, the observed reduction in pain score result in a higher proportion of women reporting tolerable pain. This finding and the high acceptance as a pain reduction method thereby suggests clinical relevance. Intrauterine instillation of mepivacaine is a possible strategy to increase IUD utilization, particularly among nulliparous women who are at high risk of unintended pregnancy.

Placement of an intrauterine device within 48 hours after second-trimester medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundInternational guidelines recommend placement of intrauterine devices immediately after second trimester medical abortion, but evidence concerning the optimal time for intrauterine device placement is lacking from clinical trials. ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of intrauterine device placement within 48 hours, compared with placement at two to four weeks after second trimester medical abortion. We hypothesized that intrauterine device placement within 48 hours would be superior compared with placement at two to four weeks after the abortion, in terms of the proportion of intrauterine device use after six months, with maintained safety and acceptability. Study DesignIn this open-label, randomized, controlled, superiority trial, we recruited participants at eight abortion clinics in Sweden. Eligible participants were ≥18 years, requesting medical abortion with gestation ≥85 days and opting for use of a post abortion intrauterine device. Participants were randomized (1:1) to intrauterine device placement either within 48 hours of complete abortion (intervention) or after 2 to 4 weeks (control). Our primary outcome was self-reported use of an intrauterine device after 6 months. Secondary outcomes included expulsion rates, pain at placement, adverse events and complications, acceptability, and subsequent pregnancies and abortions. Differences in non-normal continuous variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U-test and differences in dichotomous variables with the chi square or Fisher’s exact tests. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Group differences are presented by modified intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. ResultsBetween January 2019, and June 2022, we enrolled 179 participants, of whom 90 were assigned to intervention and 89 to control. Enrolment was prematurely stopped after an interim analysis exceeded a predefined intrauterine device expulsion rate of 20%. By modified intention-to-treat, use of intrauterine device after 6 months was 50.7% (34/67) in the intervention group compared to 71.6% (48/67) in the control group (proportion difference 20.9%; 95% confidence interval 4.4%-35.9%; P=.02). The intrauterine device expulsion rate was 30.1% (22/73) in the intervention group versus 2.9% (2/70; P <.001) in the control group. Other adverse events were rare and patient acceptability was high in both groups. ConclusionIntrauterine device placement within 48 hours after second trimester medical abortion was non-superior in terms of the proportion of intrauterine device use after 6 months when compared with placement after 2 to 4 weeks. Placement within 48 hours after second trimester abortion can be used in selected individuals after counselling on expulsion risk.

Contributing factors related to abnormal uterine bleeding in perimenopausal women: a case-control study.

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) during the menopausal transition results in reproductive endocrine disorders and both physiological and pathological changes, substantially impacting women's health. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing AUB in perimenopausal women. Between April 2021 and June 2022, 120 perimenopausal women with AUB in the menopausal transition, diagnosed and treated at the Gynaecology Department of Kunming Tongren Hospital, were included in the case group. Concurrently, women undergoing routine health examinations at the same hospital were randomly selected as the control group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified factors related to AUB. The univariate analysis revealed significant associations (P < 0.05) between AUB and several factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), age at menarche, gravidity, and intrauterine device (IUD) placement in perimenopausal women. The multivariate regression analysis indicated that the independent risk factors for AUB include benign endometrial lesions (odds ratio [OR] 5.243, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.082-9.458, P < 0.001), endometrial thickness ≥ 10mm (OR 1.573, 95% CI 0.984-3.287, P < 0.001), age ≥ 50years (OR 2.045, 95% CI 1.035-4.762, P = 0.001), BMI ≥ 25kg/m2 (OR 2.436, 95% CI 1.43-4.86, P = 0.002), and IUD placement (OR 2.458, 95% CI 1.253-4.406, P < 0.001). Abnormal uterine bleeding during the menopausal transition is associated with several factors, including age, BMI, and IUD placement, highlighting the importance of early screening for these risk factors in the diagnosis and treatment of AUB.

92. Outcomes of an Immediate Postplacental Intrauterine Device Placement Program in Adolescents and Young Adults

92. Outcomes of an Immediate Postplacental Intrauterine Device Placement Program in Adolescents and Young Adults

Provider Perspectives on Analgesic Use in Intrauterine Device Insertion Procedures: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

The intrauterine device (IUD) is one type of long-acting reversible contraceptive that is becoming increasingly popular among patients and healthcare providers alike, though many are deterred from using this option due to pain or fear of pain with IUD insertion. While the IUD insertion process itself is standardized, the use of pain medication is not. There is a lack of research regarding provider preference in analgesic use for IUD insertion procedures, which analgesics are being provided to patients, and under which circumstances. This study aims to explore which analgesics are being used routinely in clinical settings, which patient populations are more likely to receive or benefit from these treatments, and why. Secondarily, this study aims to evaluate the impacts ofprovider characteristics such as location of training and practice, length of practice, and type of training in analgesic administration. Various national organizations were contacted via email and asked to distribute the "IUD Pain Management" survey via discussion board or email newsletter. This survey was developed to gather demographic information on providers of IUD placement procedures and evaluate trends in analgesic methods used based on provider and patient characteristics. Additionally, the survey included an opportunity for participants to agree to participate in a brief interview to further elaborate on their responses via phone. Survey responses were collected and evaluated on the secure QuestionPro platform.Results from the interview were qualitatively assessed by coding recurrent themes between participant interviews. Survey respondents represented physicians from family medicine and OB-GYN specialties, as well as nurse practitioners, registered nurses, physician assistants, and OB-GYN resident physicians. The average length of clinical practice is 6.7 years. The majority of respondents reported offering some sort of analgesic for IUD insertion procedures, with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the most commonly used. Participants also reported an increased likelihood of prescribing analgesics for adolescent and nulliparous patients. Participant interviews included themes such as patient perception of pain, provider training, barriers to access, and alternative analgesic options. Our study has identified a significant amount of variation in practices regarding analgesic use for IUD insertion procedures and highlighted some underlying causes of these inconsistencies. Future studies should further investigate trends in analgesic administration in IUD insertion procedures with a larger sample size and delve into factors such as provider education and barriers to access.

The contradictive findings between ultrasound, hysteroscopy and cytokines in women with nonhormonal IUDs suffering from menorrhagia: a prospective study

PurposeThe objective of this study is to assess the correlation between bleeding irregularities and the accurate placement of the intrauterine device (IUD) device in the uterine cavity, determined through transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy. In addition, the study aims to examine the cytokine profile in the uterine cavity and serum of patients experiencing bleeding irregularities after the insertion of nonhormonal IUDs.MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center, wherein patients experiencing intermenstrual bleeding and spotting after the insertion of nonhormonal IUDs were enrolled. The study involved hysteroscopic and sonographic assessments of the uterine cavity and IUD placement, along with the analysis of blood and uterine cavity cytokine profiles.ResultsDuring the period between July 2019 and February 2020, a total of eight patients who experienced intermenstrual bleeding and spotting after the insertion of nonhormonal IUDs were enrolled the study. One case was excluded since a progestative device was detected by ultrasound. Out of the five cases that underwent a thorough ultrasonographic assessment, three cases (60%) showed an embedded IUD. However, these findings were excluded by the hysteroscopic evaluation.ConclusionThe results suggest that ultrasonographic assessment may lead to an overdiagnosis of IUD mispositioning compared to hysteroscopy. In addition, both ultrasound and hysteroscopy have limitations in diagnosing the cause of bleeding in most cases. The role of local reactive inflammatory cytokines should be further studied.

Does the shape of the copper intrauterine device play a role in expulsion? Results from the ongoing European Active Surveillance Study on LCS12

ObjectiveTo compare the incidence of expulsion for different copper intrauterine device (IUD) shapes. Study designWe conducted a secondary analysis of the ongoing, prospective, non-interventional European Active Surveillance Study on LCS12 (EURAS-LCS12). Users of newly inserted IUDs were recruited in 10 European countries via a network of approximately 1200 clinicians. We restricted the analysis to copper IUD users. In the main analysis, we classified copper IUDs by shape [Nova-T frame, Tatum-T frame, Multiload frame, frameless IUDs and intrauterine balls], without differentiation of size. We calculated the cumulative incidence, crude, and adjusted hazard ratios for expulsion. Covariates included in the adjusted analyses were age, BMI, parity, education, income, IUD user status, marital status, length of device, heavy menstrual bleeding, and clinician’s experience. ResultsWe included 26,381 copper IUD users from the EURAS-LCS12 dataset for this study. The most frequently used IUD shape was the Nova-T frame (14,724 [55.8%]) followed by the Tatum-T frame (4276 [16.2%]), frameless IUDs (3374 [12.8%]), Multiload frame (2962 [11.2%]), and intrauterine balls (IUBs) (1045 [4.0%]). Cox regression analysis regarding expulsions yielded an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.7–1.0), 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0–1.8), 1.6 (95% CI, 1.2–2.1) and 3.6 (95% CI, 2.7–4.9) for Nova-T frame IUD, frameless IUDs, Multiload frame IUDs and IUBs versus Tatum-T frame IUD, respectively. ConclusionThe risk of expulsion following placement of a copper IUD is related to IUD shape, with Nova-T frame and Tatum-T frame IUDs demonstrating the lowest risk. ImplicationsOur finding of a higher risk of expulsion observed with Multiload frame, frameless, and intrauterine ball copper IUDs compared to Tatum-T frame and Nova-T frame devices during real world use has clinical importance. Clinicians may choose to use these data when counseling patients.

Women’s experiences of postpartum contraceptive services when elective caesarean section is the method of birth: a qualitative study

BackgroundThe unmet need for postpartum contraception is a global challenge. Postpartum placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) within 48 hours of vaginal delivery is available in many settings worldwide, but...

Gene expression associated with vaginal bleeding in women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel hormonal intrauterine device: A prospective study.

To evaluate gene expression associated with vaginal bleeding in the 52-mg hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) users. We conducted a prospective study involving 100 women seeking to use the 52-mg hormonal IUD for contraception. We excluded women with a history or current condition of abnormal uterine bleeding and who were unable to attend a 1-year follow up. Women who expelled the device, removed it for reasons unrelated to vaginal bleeding, or were lost to follow up were discontinued. We collected endometrial biopsies immediately before IUD placement and assessed 20 selected genes using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Users maintained a uterine bleeding diary for 12 months following IUD insertion. For statistical analysis, participants were categorized into groups with or without vaginal bleeding at 3 and 12 months. Women with elevated CXCL9 expression had an 8.15-fold higher likelihood of experiencing vaginal bleeding at 3 months (odds ratio [OR] 8.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24-29.61, P = 0.001). At 12 months of follow up, women with increased TIMP1 expression had a 2.74-fold higher chance of experiencing vaginal bleeding (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.08-6.95, P = 0.033). CXCL9 ≥ 1.5 and IL17A ≥ 0.68 were associated with a higher probability of vaginal bleeding at 3 months, while TIMP1 levels ≥0.943 were linked to an increased risk of bleeding at 12 months. Users of the 52-mg hormonal IUD with elevated relative CXCL9 expression face an increased risk of vaginal bleeding at 3-month follow up, whereas those with heightened TIMP1 expression are more likely to experience vaginal bleeding at 12 months.

Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is effective for long-term management of adenomyosis

BackgroudLaparoscopic adenomyomectomy combined with intraoperative placement of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS) is a novel conservative surgical procedure for adenomyosis. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of surgery with or without intraoperative placement of LNG-IUS treatment in adenomyosis.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of adenomyosis patients who received laparoscopic adenomyomectomy from January 2014 to April 2020, finally including 70 patients undergoing surgery-LNG-IUS as group A and 69 patients undegoing surgery only as group B. Risk factors for three-year relapse were analyzed using Cox’s multivariate proportional hazard analysis.ResultsVisual analog scale and Mansfield-Voda-Jorgensen Menstrual Bleeding Scale scores of group A at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were significantly lower than those of group B at the corresponding points (P < .001 for both scales). Individuals in both groups showed statistically significant symptom relief. The recurrence rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B at 36 months after the surgery (2.94% vs. 32.84%, P < .001). A cox proportional hazard model showed that relapse was significantly associated with coexisting ovarian endometriosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33–7.02, P = .015). Patients who received surgery-LNG-IUS had a lower risk of recurrence than those with surgery-alone (aHR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.016–0.31, P < .001).ConclusionsConservative surgery with intraoperative placement of LNG-IUS is effective and well-accepted for long-term therapy with a lower recurrence rate for adenomyosis. Coexistent ovarian endometriosis is a major factor for adenomyosis relapse.