Intrauterine Device Expulsion Research Articles

Immediate and delayed placement of the intrauterine device after abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This article aims to report the comprehensive and up-to-date analysis and evidence of the insertion rate, expulsion rate, removal rate, and utilization rate of immediate placement of intrauterine devices (IUDs) versus delayed placement after artificial abortion. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were comprehensively searched up to January 12, 2024 for studies that compared immediate versus delayed insertion of IUDs after abortion. The evaluation metrics included the number of IUD insertion after surgical or medical abortions, the frequency of expulsion and removal at 6 months or 1 year, the number of continued usage, pain intensity scores, the number of infections, the duration of bleeding, and instances of uterine perforation during or after IUD insertion. Ten randomized controlled articles were eligible, comprising 11 research projects, of which 3 projects involved the placement of an IUD after surgical abortion, and 8 projects involved the placement of an IUD after medical abortion. This included 2025 patients (977 in the immediate insertion group and 1,048 in the delayed insertion group). We summarized all the extracted evidence. The meta-analysis results indicated that for post-surgical abortions, the immediate insertion group exhibited a higher IUD placement rate than the delayed insertion group. After medical abortions, the immediate insertion group showed higher rates of IUD placement, utilization, and expulsion at 6 months or 1 year. The two groups showed no statistically significant differences in the removal rate, post-insertion infection rate, pain scores during insertion, and days of bleeding during the follow-up period. Compared to delayed placement, immediate insertion of IUDs can not only increase the usage rate at 6 months or 1 year but also enhance the placement rate.

Telemedicine for Adolescent and Young Adult Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Post-insertion Visits: Outcomes over 1 Year

Study ObjectiveTelemedicine for long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) care is understudied given the rapid implementation of these services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared outcomes over 1 year of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) attending a LARC post-insertion visit via telemedicine vs in person. DesignLongitudinal cohort study. SettingFour academic adolescent medicine clinics in the United States. ParticipantsAYAs (ages 13-26 years) who received LARC between 4/1/20 and 3/1/21 and attended a post-insertion visit within 12 weeks. Interventionsnone. Main outcome measuresOutcomes over 1 year were compared between AYAs who completed this visit via telemedicine vs in person. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and regression models. ResultsOf 194 AYAs (ages 13.9-25.7 years) attending a post-insertion visit, 40.2% utilized telemedicine. Menstrual management (odds ratio (OR) = 1.02; confidence interval (CI): 0.40-2.60), acne management (P = .28), number of visits attended (relative risk (RR) = 1.08; CI: 0.99-1.19), and LARC removal (P = .95) were similar between groups. AYAs attending via telemedicine were less likely than those attending in person to have STI testing (P = .001). Intrauterine device expulsion or malposition and arm symptoms with implant in situ were rare outcomes in both groups. ConclusionRoughly 40% of AYAs attended a post-insertion visit via telemedicine during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and had similar 1-year outcomes as those attending in person. The decreased likelihood of STI testing for those using telemedicine highlights the need to provide alternative options, when indicated, such as asynchronous or home testing. Our results support the use of telemedicine for AYA LARC post-insertion care and identify potential gaps in telemedicine care which can help improve clinic protocols.

Body Mass Index and Levonorgestrel Device Expulsion in Adolescents and Young Adults

Study ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between body mass and levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) expulsion in adolescents and young adults (AYA). Design, Setting, Participants & InterventionsA retrospective chart review was conducted of nulliparous females aged 10-24 years who had a 52-milligram LNG-IUD placed between November 2017 and May 2021 by pediatric and adolescent gynecology providers at a tertiary children's hospital, including those who underwent metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). Primary analysis focused on 10-19 year olds as they had comparable anthropometrics (namely BMI percentile [BMIP] as defined by the Centers for Disease Control). Descriptive statistics included means, standard deviations (SD), and ranges for continuous variables counts and percentages for categorical variables. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to assess associations. Logistic regressions were fit to test the associations between BMIP, MBS, and the odds of expulsion. Main Outcome Measures & ResultsA total of 588 patients were included in the primary analysis (10-19 years). Mean age was 15.8 years (±2.0). Using BMIP, 15.5% (n = 91) of the sample was overweight and 22.3% (n = 131) were obese. Within 12 months, 33 patients (5.6%) experienced expulsion. Every one-unit increase in BMIP was associated with a 3% increase in the odds of expulsion (P = .008), and each increase in BMIP category (eg, overweight vs average/underweight) was significantly associated with increased odds of expulsion (OR = 2.77-4.28). Patients who had LNG-IUD placement during MBS (n = 43) had higher odds of expulsion (OR = 3.23; P = .024) than other patients. ConclusionAYA with higher BMIP and/or who undergo MBS are at increased risk of LNG-IUD expulsion within one year of placement.

Menstrual cup use and intrauterine device expulsion in a copper intrauterine device randomized trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate menstrual cup use and intrauterine device (IUD) expulsion. Study designWe performed a secondary analysis of a 3-year contraceptive efficacy trial comparing two copper 380 mm2 IUDs. Investigators randomized participants approximately 1:4 to the TCu380A or NTCu380-Mini IUD. Approximately 12 months after enrollment began, we advised participants against menstrual cup use due to observed IUD expulsions in cup users. We evaluated IUD expulsion (including spontaneous partial and complete expulsion and accidental self-removal) at 12 and 36 months. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate IUD expulsion by age, baseline menstrual volume, body mass index, IUD type, menstrual cup use, parity, and uterine length. ResultsThis analysis included 1046 participants (203 TCu380A and 843 NTCu380-Mini), with 879 (84.0%) nulliparas. Through 12 and 36 months, expulsion occurred in 74 (7.1%, 95% CI 5.5–8.6%) and 133 (12.7%, 95% CI 10.7–14.7%) participants, respectively. Overall, 250 (23.9%) reported menstrual cup use. More menstrual cup users than non-users experienced expulsion through 12 months (32/203 [15.8%] vs. 42/843 [5.0%]) and 36 months (58/250 [23.2%] vs. 75/796 [9.4%]). Through 36 months, NTCu380-Mini menstrual cup users had higher expulsion odds, while TCu380A cup users did not. Menstrual cup users more frequently experienced accidental self-removal than non-users in participants using the TCu380A (3/53 [5.7%] vs. 0/150 [0.0%]) and the NTCu380-Mini (20/197 [10.2%] vs. 7/646 [1.1%]). In multivariable regression, we found increased odds of expulsion through 36 months in participants using menstrual cups with the NTCu380-Mini (aOR 3.13, 95% CI 1.16–8.46) and <25 years (aOR 1.59, 95% CI 1.07–2.34). ConclusionsWe found higher odds of IUD expulsion with menstrual cup and concurrent NTCu380-Mini IUD use over 36 months of use, but not with concurrent TCu380A IUD use. Menstrual cup users experienced higher likelihood of accidental self-removal regardless of IUD type. ImplicationsMenstrual cup and NTCu380-Mini use may increase IUD expulsion risk and may increase accidental self-removal risk with TCu380A and NTCu380-Mini use. Clinicians should advise patients of these risks and consider warning patients using an IUD shaped like the NTCu380-Mini (Nova-T frames) of expulsion risk with menstrual cup use.

One-year follow up of contraceptive use and pregnancy rates after early medical abortion: Secondary outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of immediate post-abortion placement of intrauterine devices.

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) effectively prevent unwanted pregnancies. Little is known about long-term outcomes of women choosing an IUD after early medical abortion. We present secondary outcome data of continuation rates, factors associated with continuation and discontinuation, choice of IUD type, women's satisfaction with IUD, and IUD expulsions, subsequent pregnancies, and abortions within 1 year post-abortion in a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial on IUD placement within 48 hours compared with placement 2-4 weeks after medical abortion up to 63 days' gestation (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03603145). Of the 240 women studied, 112/120 (93.3%) in the intervention group vs 113/120 (94.2%) in the control group completed the 12-month follow-up. The rate of IUD use at 12 months was 84/112 (75%) in the intervention group vs 75/113 (66.4%) in the control group (P = 0.19). Attendance at the IUD placement visit was the only predictor of long-term IUD use (relative risk [RR] = 5.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-16.0; P = 0.001). The main reason for choosing an IUD was high contraceptive effectiveness. The most common reasons for IUD discontinuation were bleeding problems and abdominal pain. IUD expulsion was rare and did not differ between groups. Satisfaction among IUD users at 1 year was high (>94%) and the majority of all participants would recommend IUD to a friend (65.8%). Use of no contraception and experience of unprotected intercourse were less common in the intervention group (11/112 [9.8%] vs 25/113 [22.1%], P = 0.02 and 17/112 [15.2%] vs 32/113 [28.3%], P = 0.02, respectively). There was no difference in the rate of subsequent pregnancies and abortions (pregnancies 14/112, 12.5% in the intervention group vs 8/113, 7.1% in the control group, P = 0.19; abortions 5/112, 4.5% vs 3/113, 2.7%, P = 0.5). IUD placement after medical abortion led to high continuation and satisfaction rates with no difference between groups. We found no difference in IUD expulsions after immediate compared with later placement. Unprotected intercourse was significantly less common in the immediate group. In clinical practice, immediate placement of IUDs available free of charge at the abortion clinic is likely to increase attendance to the placement visit and continued use of IUDs after abortion.

Risks of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion Associated With Intrauterine Devices.

The APEX-IUD (Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Devices) study evaluated the association of postpartum timing of intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, breastfeeding, heavy menstrual bleeding, and IUD type (levonorgestrel-releasing vs copper) with risks of uterine perforation and IUD expulsion in usual clinical practice. We summarize the clinically important findings to inform counseling and shared decision making. APEX-IUD was a real-world (using U.S. health care data) retrospective cohort study of individuals aged 50 years and younger with IUD insertions between 2001 and 2018 and with electronic health record data. Cumulative incidences of uterine perforation and IUD expulsion were calculated. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs were estimated from proportional hazards models with control of confounding. Among the study population of 326,658, absolute risk of uterine perforation was low overall (cumulative incidence, 0.21% [95% CI 0.19-0.23%] at 1 year and 0.61% [95% CI 0.56-0.66% at 5 years]) but was elevated for IUDs inserted during time intervals within 1 year postpartum, particularly among those between 4 days and 6 weeks postpartum (aHR 6.71, 95% CI 4.80-9.38), relative to nonpostpartum insertions. Among postpartum insertions, IUD expulsion risk was greatest for insertions in the immediate postpartum period (0-3 days after delivery) compared with nonpostpartum (aHR 5.34, 95% CI 4.47-6.39). Postpartum individuals who were breastfeeding had a slightly elevated risk of perforation and lowered risk of expulsion than those not breastfeeding. Among nonpostpartum individuals, those with a heavy menstrual bleeding diagnosis were at greater risk of expulsion than those without (aHR 2.84, 95% CI 2.66-3.03); heavy menstrual bleeding also was associated with a slightly elevated perforation risk. There was a slightly elevated perforation risk and slightly lower expulsion risk associated with levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs compared with copper IUDs. Absolute risk of adverse outcomes with IUD insertion is low. Clinicians should be aware of the differences in risks of uterine perforation and expulsion associated with IUD insertion during specific postpartum time periods and with a heavy menstrual bleeding diagnosis. This information should be incorporated into counseling and decision making for patients considering IUD insertion. Bayer AG. EU PAS register, EUPAS33461.

Colouterine Fistula Caused by Intrauterine Device Migration : A Case Report

Intrauterine device (IUD) is simple and long-term medical device contraception. The IUD is a one of safety long duration contraception with several systemic side effects. But it can also cause morbidity by migration into another organ. IUD migration is a one of rare complication. We present a 28-year-old woman came to surgery department presented with hematoschezia when menstrual period since one month ago. Physical examiation showed hemodynamically stable and no abnormality. According to pelvic x-ray examination showed corpus allienum of IUD projected in pelvic cavum as high as foramen III-IV sacralis anterior. Patient also examined for CT-Scan that showed corpus allienum 1000-2000 HU density (T-shape IUD) in uteri cavum penetrate right posterolateral wall of uteri into sigmoid colon as high as S3 vertebrae followed by pneumoperitoneum of Douglas cavum. Colonoscopy showed rectal bleeding due to corpus allienum of expulsion of IUD. IUD extraction may lead to difficulties using colonoscopy so she planned to laparoscopic procedure. Possible laparoscopic options for IUDs embedded in the bowel include device extraction and intracorporeal suturing, or resection of the affected segment with primary anastomosis. She underwent a laparoscopic surgery to IUD extraction, adhesiolisis, and colouterine fistula repair

Demographic, Reproductive, and Medical Risk Factors for Intrauterine Device Expulsion

ABSTRACT Intrauterine device (IUD) expulsion is more common among women with heavy menstrual bleeding, parity, higher body mass index (BMI), younger age, dysmenorrhea, or immediate postabortion or postpartum insertion. The APEX-IUD study was an observational cohort study of 326,658 individuals examining the association with breastfeeding, IUD type, and timing of postpartum IUD insertion with IUD expulsion and uterine perforation. This data set provides an opportunity to examine specific demographic, reproductive, and medical risk factors associated with IUD expulsion. This analysis of APEX-IUD data aimed to determine the associations of 6 risk factors (age, race/ethnicity, parity, BMI, heavy menstrual bleeding, and dysmenorrhea) and IUD expulsion, as well as the extent to which these associations differed for LNG-IUD compared with copper IUD users. Individuals aged 50 years or younger at the time of IUD insertion without a delivery 52 weeks or less before insertion were included. Individuals were followed from IUD insertion until IUD expulsion, uterine perforation, removal, reinsertion, expiration, pregnancy, hysterectomy, death, disenrollment from the health care system, or end of study period (June 2018). Crude incidence rates for each risk factor category were calculated using the number of expulsions during the time at risk divided by the total person-years at risk and were reported as the number of expulsions per 1000 person-years at risk. Hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals from Cox regression models were used to evaluate associations of the risk factors with IUD expulsion. These models were adjusted for potential confounding effects and were separately used to assess the association of covariates with IUD expulsion varied by IUD type. The total study cohort included 228,834 individuals (LNG-IUD: 184,733 [80.7%]; copper IUD: 41,123 [18.0%]; unknown type: 2978 [1/3%]). The average length of follow-up was 2.0 years, and there were 6762 expulsions with a crude incidence rate of 14.9 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 14.6–15.3). Adjusted hazards ratios (aHRs) showed the younger age groups having a higher risk of IUD expulsion and a trend toward lower aHRs with increasing age. Individuals with parity of 4 or more had the highest risk of IUD expulsion, and a parity of 2 was associated with the lowest risk on adjusted analysis. Adjusted analysis revealed a greater risk of IUD expulsion among individuals with higher BMI or heavy menstrual bleeding diagnosis compared with the comparator group. Multiple racial and ethnic groups including non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic Black, Hispanic White, Asian, or Pacific Islander were associated with a greater risk of IUD expulsion compared with non-Hispanic Whites when adjusting for covariates. When comparing aHRs by copper IUD or LNG-IUD; younger age was more strongly associated with expulsion among copper IUD users than LNG-IUD users, the risk for expulsion associated with obesity was significantly attenuated for copper IUD users compared with LNG-IUD users, and the risk of expulsion for those with heavy menstrual bleeding was partially attenuated by copper IUDs. Adjusted analysis revealed no association between dysmenorrhea and IUD expulsion. The results of this study show that, among the 6 risk factors investigated here, the risk of IUD expulsion was highest among individuals with a diagnosis of heavy menstrual bleeding, particularly in recent and past periods.

Early vs Interval Postpartum Intrauterine Device Placement

The early postpartum period, 2 to 4 weeks after birth, may be a convenient time for intrauterine device (IUD) placement; the placement could then coincide with early postpartum or well-baby visits. To determine expulsion rates for IUDs placed early postpartum compared with those placed at the standard interval 6-week visit. In this randomized noninferiority trial, people who had a vaginal or cesarean birth were randomly assigned to undergo early (14-28 days) or interval (42-56 days) postpartum IUD placement. Clinicians blinded to participant study group used transvaginal ultrasonography to confirm IUD presence and position at the 6-month postpartum follow-up. The study assessed 642 postpartum people from 4 US medical centers, enrolled a consecutive sample of 404 participants from March 2018 to July 2021, and followed up each participant for 6 months postpartum. Early postpartum IUD placement, at 2 to 4 weeks postpartum, vs standard interval placement 6 to 8 weeks postpartum. The primary outcome was complete IUD expulsion by 6 months postpartum; the prespecified noninferiority margin was 6%. Secondary outcomes were partial IUD expulsion, IUD removal, pelvic infection, patient satisfaction, uterine perforation, pregnancy, and IUD use at 6 months postpartum. IUD malposition was an exploratory outcome. Among 404 enrolled participants, 203 participants were randomly assigned to undergo early IUD placement and 201 to undergo interval IUD placement (mean [SD] age, 29.9 [5.4] years; 46 [11.4%] were Black, 228 [56.4%] were White, and 175 [43.3%] were Hispanic). By 6 months postpartum, 53 participants (13%) never had an IUD placed and 57 (14%) were lost to follow-up. Among the 294 participants (73%) who received an IUD and completed 6-month follow-up, complete expulsion rates were 3 of 149 (2.0% [95% CI, 0.4%-5.8%]) in the early placement group and 0 of 145 (0% [95% CI, 0.0%-2.5%]) in the interval placement group (between-group difference, 2.0 [95% CI, -0.5 to 5.7] percentage points). Partial expulsion occurred in 14 (9.4% [95% CI, 5.2%-15.3%]) participants in the early placement group and 11 (7.6% [95% CI, 3.9%-13.2%]) participants in the interval placement group (between-group difference, 1.8 [95% CI, -4.8 to 8.6] percentage points). IUD use at 6 months was similar between the groups: 141 (69.5% [95% CI, 62.6%-75.7%]) participants in the early group vs 139 (67.2% [95% CI, 60.2%-73.6%]) in the interval group. Early IUD placement at 2 to 4 weeks postpartum compared with 6 to 8 weeks postpartum was noninferior for complete expulsion, but not partial expulsion. Understanding the risk of expulsion at these time points may help patients and clinicians make informed choices about the timing of IUD placement. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03462758.

Factors Affecting Early Intrauterine Device Expulsion Inserted Immediately After Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy

Background: Post-abortion insertion of an intrauterine device (IUD) is recommended for the prevention of repetitive voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTOP) in women who choose to have a reliable contraceptive method. Aim: This study aimed to analyze the incidence of IUD dislocation and its factors in patients who had an IUD immediately inserted after VTOP. Methods: In this retrospective study, 288 consequent patients who came to our hospital for VTOP between August 1st, 2018 to August 26th, 2019, and had given signed consent for immediate IUD insertion were taken as the study group. The demographic characteristics, obstetric history, and gestational age at the time of the procedure were obtained from the patient records. On the 10th day of post-abortion, the localization of the IUD was evaluated by speculum examination and transvaginal ultrasonography. The effects of obstetric history and gestational age at the time of termination on IUD dislocation rates were analyzed statistically. Results: The overall incidence of IUD dislocation was 16.3 % at the 10th-day follow-up visit. The incidence of IUD dislocation was similar in patients with gestational age &lt; 5w, 5-7w, and 7-10w (21 %, 14.5 %, and 13 %, respectively, p=0.36). However, the incidence increased with high gravity and parity. The gravity, parity, number of vaginal deliveries, and cesarean section were higher in patients with an IUD dislocation than the ones with an IUD in place. Conclusion: The IUD insertion after voluntary legal termination of pregnancy is suitable for all gestational ages. A high number of previous pregnancies and deliveries are risk factors for IUD expulsion after immediate IUD insertion.

Incidence of Post-Placental IUD Expulsion in Women of Childbearing Age

Background:The United States Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend insertion of an Intra Uterine Device (IUD) immediately after delivery, due to the low complication rate. Postplacental IUD insertion is the insertion of an IUD immediately after delivery of the placenta during vaginal delivery. This method serves to reduce the number of births. However, post-placental insertion is believed to have a high expulsion rate. which is around 2-27%Purpose : To analyze and summarize the results of one study with another regarding the incidence of postplacental IUD expulsion in women of childbearing ageMethod:The research method used is literature review by searching for articles related to the theme taken from several search engines namely Pubmed, and Google Scholar and Search is done using the keyword IUD expulsion, Postplacental, women of childbearing age.Results: the installation of post placental IUDs has the opportunity to experience an expulsion eventConclusion: From all the journals that have been reviewed It can be concluded that the installation of post placental IUD has the opportunity to experience an expulsion event.

Clinical outcomes of intrauterine device insertions by newly trained providers: The ECHO trial experience

ObjectivesTo assess the rates of failed insertion, expulsion, and perforation when intrauterine device (IUD) insertions were done by newly trained clinicians, and to examine factors that may affect these outcomes. Study designWe evaluated skill-based outcomes following IUD insertion at 12 African sites in a secondary analysis of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) randomized trial. Before trial initiation, we provided competency-based IUD training to clinicians and offered ongoing clinical support. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine factors associated with expulsion. ResultsAmong 2582 IUD acceptors who underwent first attempted IUD insertion, 141 experienced insertion failure (5.46%) and seven had uterine perforation (0.27%). Perforation was more common among breastfeeding women within three months postpartum (0.65%) compared with non-breastfeeding women (0.22%). We recorded 493 expulsions (15.5 per 100 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.1─16.9): 383 partial and 110 complete. The risk of IUD expulsion was lower among women older than 24 years (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50─0.78) and may be higher among nulliparous women. (aHR 1.65, 95% CI 0.97─2.82). Breastfeeding (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72─1.22) had no significant effect on expulsion. IUD expulsion rate was highest during the first three months of the trial. ConclusionsIUD insertion failure and uterine perforation rates in our study were comparable to those reported in the literature. These results suggest that training, ongoing support, and opportunities to apply new skills were effective in ensuring good clinical outcomes for women receiving IUD insertion by newly trained providers. ImplicationsData from this study support recommendations to program managers, policymakers, and clinicians that IUDs can be inserted safely in resource-constrained settings when providers receive appropriate training and support.

Immediate Postpartum Insertion of Copper Intrauterine Device in a Brazilian University Hospital: Expulsion and Continuation Rates.

To evaluate the expulsion and continuation rates of the copper intrauterine device (IUD) inserted in the immediate postpartum period in a Brazilian public university hospital. In the present cohort study, we included women who received immediate postpartum IUD at vaginal delivery or cesarean s March 2018 to December 2019. Clinical data and the findings of transvaginal ultrasound (US) scans performed 6-weeks postpartum were collected. The expulsion and continuation rates were assessed 6-months postpartum using data from the electronic medical records or by telephone contact. The primary outcome was the proportion of IUDs expelled at 6 months. For the statistical analysis, we used the Student t-test, the Poisson distribution, and the Chi-squared test. There were 3,728 births in the period, and 352 IUD insertions were performed, totaling a rate of 9.4%. At 6 weeks postpartum, the IUD was properly positioned in 65.1% of the cases, in 10.8% there was partial expulsion, and in 8.5% it had been completely expelled. At 6 months postpartum, information was obtained from 234 women, 74.4% of whom used IUD, with an overall expulsion rate of 25.6%. The expulsion rate was higher after vaginal delivery when compared with cesarean section (68.4% versus 31.6% respectively; p = 0.031). There were no differences in terms of age, parity, gestational age, final body mass index, and newborn weight. Despite the low insertion rate of copper IUDs in the postpartum period and a higher expulsion rate, the rate of long-term continuation of intrauterine contraception was high, indicating that it is a useful intervention to prevent unwanted pregnancies and to reduce short-interval birth.

P070Short-interval births among patients choosing immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (ipp larc) after tennessee medicaid policy change

<h3>Objectives</h3> This project aimed to determine the impact of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) IPP LARC on short-interval birth (SIB) at our institution among publicly insured patients after a Medicaid policy change in November 2017. <h3>Methods</h3> State birth certificate records (BCR) for 2015–2020 (n=483,006) were obtained and matched by SSN, date of birth, and name with hospital delivery records. SIB was defined as a birth within 24 months of a previous birth. Between July 2018 and December 2018, 276 patients received IPP LARC (44.2% intrauterine device (IUD) and 55.8% implants); 261 patients were identified in BCR and included in this analysis. <h3>Results</h3> From 2018 to 2020, BCR demonstrated the SIB rate among publicly insured patients at our institution was 24.9%. Among the 261 patients who received IPP LARC, at delivery, 88 (33.7%) were nulliparous and 173 (66.3%) were multiparous. Of the multiparous patients, 41 (23.7%) had a SIB (mean 16.5 months) preceding this delivery. Of the IPP LARC placed, 18% were adolescents (≤ 20 years old), 17.7% were Hispanic, 88.1% were White, 10% were Black, 8.4% of women had diabetes and 15.3% had diagnosed hypertension. Of the patients that received IPP LARC, 11 (4.2%) had a SIB (mean 18 months) identified in the BCR by the end of 2020. Of the 11 patients who had a SIB, the majority (54.5%) had one living child and 27.2% were ≤ 20 years old. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Despite the known increased risk of expulsion of IPP IUDs, SIB was significantly decreased with IPP LARC in the population studied. More work on the impact of this policy change is planned.

Placement of an intrauterine device within 48 hours after early medical abortion—a randomized controlled trial

Intrauterine devices are safe, well-tolerated, and known to reduce the risk of unwanted pregnancies. At medical abortion, intrauterine devices are placed at a follow-up visit. Patients who miss this visit risk being left without contraception. This study aimed to investigate if placement of an intrauterine device within 48 hours of completed medical abortion at up to 63 days' gestation leads to higher user rates at 6 months after the abortion compared with placement at 2 to 4 weeks after abortion. Furthermore, we aimed to compare continued use of intrauterine devices, safety, and patient satisfaction between groups. We performed an open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter, superiority trial (phase 3). A total of 240 patients requesting medical abortion at up to 63 days' gestation and opting for an intrauterine device were allocated to placement within 48 hours of complete medical abortion (intervention group) or at 2 to 4 weeks after abortion (control group). We defined the abortion as complete after bleeding with clots and cessation of heavy bleeding following the use of misoprostol. Patients answered questionnaires at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was use of intrauterine device at 6 months postabortion. Secondary outcomes included expulsion rate, pain at placement, adverse events and complications from the abortion, acceptability, and pregnancies and their outcomes. Differences in nonparametric continuous variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test and differences in dichotomous variables with the chi square or Fisher exact tests. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. In the intervention group, 91 of 111 (82%) participants used an intrauterine device at 6 months after the abortion vs 87 of 112 (77.7%) in the control group, with a difference in proportion of 4.3% (95% confidence interval,-0.062 to 0.148; P=.51). Attendance rate and rate of successful intrauterine device placement were similar between the groups. Patients in the intervention group had lower pain scores at placement of the intrauterine device (mean pain score [visual analogue scale], 32.3; standard deviation, 29) compared with the control group (mean pain score [visual analogue scale], 43.4; standard deviation, 27.9; P=.002). Patients preferred their allocated time of placement significantly more often in the intervention group (83/111, 74.8%) than in the control group (70/114, 61.4%; P=.03). Use of ultrasound at intrauterine device placement (because of doubts concerning complete abortion) was more common in the intervention group (43/108, 39.8%) than in the control group (15/101, 14.9%; P<.001), and in one patient in the control group a retained gestational sac was found. Three patients in the intervention group and 2 in the control group had a vacuum aspiration. No difference was found in intrauterine device expulsion rates between the groups. Expulsion during the first 6 months after abortion was experienced by 9 of 97 (9.3%) patients in the intervention group and 4 of 89 (4.5%; P=.25) in the control group. There were no perforations or infections requiring antibiotic treatment. Placement of an intrauterine device within 48 hours after medical abortion at ≤63 days' gestation does not lead to higher user rates at 6 months after the abortion compared with intrauterine device placement at 2 to 4 weeks after abortion. When compared with placement at a follow-up visit after 2 to 4 weeks, intrauterine device placement within 48 hours after early medical abortion seems safe, is preferred by patients, and is associated with lower pain scores.

Continuation rates of two different-sized copper intrauterine devices among nulliparous women: Interim 12-month results of a single-blind, randomised, multicentre trial.

SummaryBackgroundThe most widely used copper intrauterine device (IUD) in the world (the TCu380A), and the only product available in many countries, causes side effects and early removals for many users. These problems are exacerbated in nulliparous women, who have smaller uterine cavities compared to parous women. We compared first-year continuation rates and reasons/probabilities for early removal of the TCu380A versus a smaller Belgian copper IUD among nulliparous users.MethodsThis 12-month interim report is derived from a pre-planned interim analysis of a sub population and focused on key secondary comparative endpoints. In this participant-blinded trial at 16 centres in the USA, we randomised participants aged 17–40 in a 4:1 ratio to the NT380-Mini or the TCu380A. In the first year, participants had follow-up visits at 6-weeks and 3, 6, and 12-months, and a phone contact at 9 months; we documented continued use, expulsions, and reasons for removal. Among participants with successful IUD placement, we compared probabilities of IUD continuation and specific reasons for discontinuation using log-rank tests. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03124160 and is closed to recruitment.FindingsBetween June 1, 2017, and February 25, 2019, we assigned 927 nulliparous women to either the NT380-Mini (n = 744) or the TCu380A (n = 183); the analysis population was 732 (NT380-Mini) and 176 (TCu380A). Participants using the NT380-Mini, compared to the TCu380A, had higher 12-month continuation rates (78·7% [95% CI: 72·9–84·5%] vs. 70·2% [95% CI: 59·7–80·7], p = 0·014), lower rates of removal for bleeding and/or pain (8·1% vs. 16·2%, p = 0·003) and lower IUD expulsion rates (4·8% vs. 8·9%, p = 0·023), respectively.InterpretationThe NT380-Mini offers important benefits for a nulliparous population compared to the TCu380A in the first twelve months, when pivotal experiences typically occur. Higher continuation rates with the NT380-Mini may avert disruptions in contraceptive use and help users avoid unintended pregnancy.FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and Mona Lisa, N.V. (Belgium).

Intrauterine Device Outcomes in Young Women with Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Comparing Patients with and without Inherited Bleeding Disorders

To evaluate the use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) in two young women's hematology clinics and compare adverse events in adolescents with and without inherited bleeding disorders (BDs) DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort study from February 2014 through February 2020 SETTING: Young women's hematology clinics at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, and Children's Medical Center in Dallas, Texas PARTICIPANTS: Female patients evaluated for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) who underwent IUD placement INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of IUD expulsion, malposition, and ongoing HMB requiring additional medical treatment RESULTS: We identified 43 patients with BDs and 35 patients without BDs who underwent placement of an IUD for HMB. The mean age was 14.9 years (range 11.0-21.4 years) at the time of presentation and 15.8 years (range 11.0-21.4 years) at IUD placement. Those with BDs were younger at the time of IUD insertion. Most patients (90%) had previously failed other methods to control HMB. The annual rate of IUD adverse events was 0.25 per year of use, and all adverse events occurred in the first 20 months after placement. There were no significant differences in adverse IUD events in patients with and without BDs, although those without BDs requested IUD removal more frequently. In this cohort of adolescent females, the presence of a BD was not associated with a higher IUD expulsion rate. IUD placement should be considered a first-line option for adolescents with BDs who experience HMB.

Use of the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System to Treat Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Adolescents and Young Adults with Inherited Bleeding Disorders and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

To report on the rate of amenorrhea among adolescents and young adults with a bleeding diathesis after insertion of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) DESIGN: Retrospective chart review SETTING: Tertiary care, multidisciplinary Gynecology-Hematology clinic or Adolescent Gynecology clinic PARTICIPANTS: The cohort included 35 females aged 12-25 years presenting from January 2010 to January 2020 with heavy menstrual bleeding, 23 with an inherited blood disorder, and 12 with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome INTERVENTIONS: The 52-mg LNG-IUS MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was bleeding profile after LNG-IUS insertion. Secondary outcomes included rates of amenorrhea, intrauterine device (IUD) expulsion, IUD discontinuation, and unplanned pregnancy. Mean age at menarche was 11.6 years, with mean age at insertion of 16.9 (range 11-23). Most participants were white (n=26, 74.3%). Von Willebrand disease was present in 16 patients (45.7%) and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in 12 (34.3%). Most (91.4%) had tried at least 1 hormonal regimen prior to LNG-IUS. Most participants (81.8%) reported improvement in bleeding, with 60.6% reporting spotting or amenorrhea. LNG-IUS expulsion occurred in 3 participants (9.1%) within the first 21 days, despite hemostatic agents at time of insertion. Mean continuation was 5.08 years (95% CI, 4.24-5.92), with 79% likelihood that participants kept their IUD in place for at least 2.5 years, and some up to 6 years. The 52-mg LNG-IUS is an effective treatment option for adolescents and young adults with heavy menstrual bleeding and a bleeding diathesis, with high rates of amenorrhea. Rates of IUD expulsion appeared higher during the first 30 days, but long-term continuation remained high.

Association between menorrhagia and risk of intrauterine device–related uterine perforation and device expulsion: results from the Association of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study

Intrauterine devices are effective instruments for contraception, and 1 levonorgestrel-releasing device is also indicated for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia). To compare the incidence of intrauterine device expulsion and uterine perforation in women with and without a diagnosis of menorrhagia within the first 12 months before device insertion STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in 3 integrated healthcare systems (Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Southern California, and Washington) and a healthcare information exchange (Regenstrief Institute) in the United States using electronic health records. Nonpostpartum women aged ≤50 years with intrauterine device (eg, levonorgestrel or copper) insertions from 2001 to 2018 and without a delivery in the previous 12 months were studied in this analysis. Recent menorrhagia diagnosis (ie, recorded ≤12 months before insertion) was ascertained from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The study outcomes, viz, device expulsion and device-related uterine perforation (complete or partial), were ascertained from electronic medical records and validated in the data sources. The cumulative incidence and crude incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the crude and adjusted hazard ratios using propensity score overlap weighting (13-16 variables) and 95% confidence intervals. Among 228,834 nonpostpartum women, the mean age was 33.1 years, 44.4% of them were White, and 31,600 (13.8%) had a recent menorrhagia diagnosis. Most women had a levonorgestrel-releasing device (96.4% of those with and 78.2% of those without a menorrhagia diagnosis). Women with a menorrhagia diagnosis were likely to be older, obese, and have dysmenorrhea or fibroids. Women with a menorrhagia diagnosis had a higher intrauterine device-expulsion rate (40.01 vs 10.92 per 1000 person-years) than those without, especially evident in the first few months after insertion. Women with a menorrhagia diagnosis had a higher cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) of expulsion (7.00% [6.70-7.32] at 1 year and 12.03% [11.52-12.55] at 5 years) vs those without (1.77% [1.70-1.84] at 1 year and 3.69% [3.56-3.83] at 5 years). The risk of expulsion was increased for women with a menorrhagia diagnosis vs for those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.84 [95% confidence interval, 2.66-3.03]). The perforation rate was low overall (<1/1000 person-years) but higher in women with a diagnosis of menorrhagia vs in those without (0.98 vs 0.63 per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) of uterine perforation was slightly higher for women with a menorrhagia diagnosis (0.09% [0.06-0.14] at 1 year and 0.39% [0.29-0.53] at 5 years) than those without it (0.07% [0.06-0.08] at 1 year and 0.28% [0.24-0.33] at 5 years). The risk of perforation was slightly increased in women with a menorrhagia diagnosis vs in those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.13). The risk of expulsion is significantly higher in women with a recent diagnosis of menorrhagia. Patient education and counseling regarding the potential expulsion risk is recommended at insertion. The absolute risk of perforation for women with a recent diagnosis of menorrhagia is very low. The increased expulsion and perforation rates observed are likely because of causal factors of menorrhagia.

Association of the Timing of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion and Breastfeeding With Risks of Intrauterine Device Expulsion

Intrauterine device (IUD) expulsion increases the risk of unintended pregnancy; how timing of postpartum IUD insertion and breastfeeding are associated with risk of expulsion is relevant to the benefit-risk profile. To evaluate the association of postpartum timing of IUD insertion and breastfeeding status with incidence and risk of IUD expulsion. The Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Devices (APEX-IUD) cohort study included women aged 50 years or younger with an IUD insertion between 2001 and 2018. The breastfeeding analysis focused on a subcohort of women at 52 or fewer weeks post partum with known breastfeeding status. The study was conducted using data from electronic health records (EHRs) at 4 research sites with access to EHR: 3 Kaiser Permanente sites (Northern California, Southern California, Washington) and the Regenstrief Institute (Indiana). Data analysis was conducted from June to November 2019. Timing of IUD insertion post partum was categorized into discrete time periods: 0 to 3 days, 4 days to 6 or fewer weeks, more than 6 weeks to 14 or fewer weeks, more than 14 weeks to 52 or fewer weeks, and non-post partum (>52 weeks or no evidence of delivery). Breastfeeding status at the time of insertion was determined from clinical records, diagnostic codes, or questionnaires from well-baby visits. Incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using propensity scores to adjust for confounding. The full cohort included 326 658 women (mean [SD] age, 32.0 [8.3] years; 38 911 [11.9%] Asian or Pacific Islander; 696 [0.2%] Hispanic Black; 56 180 [17.2%] Hispanic other; 42 501 [13.0%] Hispanic White; 28 323 [8.7%] non-Hispanic Black; 137 102 [42.0%] non-Hispanic White), and the subcohort included 94 817 women. Most IUDs were levonorgestrel-releasing (259 234 [79.4%]). There were 8943 expulsions. The 5-year cumulative incidence of IUD expulsion was highest for insertions 0 to 3 days post partum (10.73%; 95% CI, 9.12%-12.61%) and lowest for insertions more than 6 weeks to 14 or fewer weeks post partum (3.18%; 95% CI, 2.95%-3.42%). Adjusted HRs using women with non-post partum IUD insertion as the referent were 5.34 (95% CI, 4.47-6.39) for those with postpartum insertion at 0 to 3 days; 1.22 (95% CI, 1.05-1.41) for those with postpartum insertion at 4 days to 6 or fewer weeks; 1.06 (95% CI, 0.95-1.18) for those with postpartum insertion at more than 6 to 14 or fewer weeks; and 1.43 (95% CI, 1.29-1.60) for those with postpartum insertion at more than 14 to 52 or fewer weeks. In the subcohort, 5-year cumulative incidence was 3.49% (95% CI, 3.25%-3.73%) for breastfeeding women and 4.57% (95% CI, 4.22%-4.95%) for nonbreastfeeding women; the adjusted HR for breastfeeding vs not breastfeeding was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.78). In this study of real-world data, IUD expulsion was rare but more common with immediate postpartum insertion. Breastfeeding was associated with lower expulsion risk.