Intrathecal Fentanyl Research Articles

Intrathecal Fentanyl Pump Placement in a Patient With Chronic Pain Caused by Hereditary Multiple Exostoses: A Case Report

Intrathecal Fentanyl Pump Placement in a Patient With Chronic Pain Caused by Hereditary Multiple Exostoses: A Case Report

Comparative study between intrathecal fentanyl and dorsal penile nerve block for controlling postoperative pain after inflatable penile prosthesis implanation

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl and dorsal penile nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Patients and methods: A prospective single-center study included 80 patients amenable to IPP. Patients were divided equally into two groups. Group I included 40 patients who were managed with spinal anesthesia with intrathecal fentanyl before undergoing IPP. Group II comprised 40 patients who received spinal anesthesia with dorsal penile block before IPP. Study groups were compared regarding postoperative VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores, total narcotics consumption, patient satisfaction levels, and perioperative complications. Results: The study groups were comparable regarding baseline patients’ criteria. The operative time was comparable between the study groups, with group I and group II having respective median times of 64 minutes (interquartile range: 55-78) and 67 minutes (interquartile range: 56-81) (p = 0.65). Additionally, both groups demonstrated similar distributions in IPP implant cylinder and reservoir size (p = 0.9). Postoperative pain was higher in group I, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Eight patients in group I (20%) called the physician’s office asking for pain medication, compared to two patients in group II (5%) (p = 0.04). 85% of patients in group II were highly satisfied compared to 50 % in group I (p = 0.003). We reported a 5% complication rate in group I compared to 2.5% in group II (p = 0.6). Conclusions: The present study found that the dorsal penile nerve block offers superior postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction compared to intrathecal fentanyl for patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis insertion.

Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl as an adjunct in spinal anaesthesia to ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block as an effective postoperative analgesia for Caesarean section surgery.

Postoperative pain in patients, if dealt with inadequately, has been a significant cause of morbidity. The present study compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl and ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block following Caesarean surgery. A prospective randomised controlled study was planned for parturients who underwent Caesarean surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Patients received bupivacaine (10mg) and 25µg of intrathecal fentanyl in the spinal anaesthesia (group intrathecal fentanyl, n = 30) or 20mL of 0.375% ropivacaine bilateral quadratus lumborum block (group quadratus lumborum; n = 30) after surgery. The visual analogue scale score, quality of recovery-15 score and incidence of ill effects were recorded. The postoperative haemodynamic parameters were comparable between the two groups. The visual analogue scale score at different time intervals decreased after the quadratus lumborum block (p < 0.05). The mean global quality of recovery score was better in the quadratus lumborum group (p < 0.001). In the quadratus lumborum group, the mean time to first ambulation was lower than that in the intrathecal fentanyl group (p < 0.05). The requirement for first-rescue analgesia was earlier in the intrathecal fentanyl group (4.67 ± 0.72) than in the quadratus lumborum group (4.92 ± 0.88). Intrathecal fentanyl and quadratus lumborum block had effective postoperative analgesic effects on Caesarean surgery patients. However, the quadratus lumborum block group exhibited better analgesia and early ambulation than the intrathecal fentanyl group, with an improved quality of recovery.

Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopaedic surgery

Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopaedic surgery

Comparative Efficacy of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Levobupivacaine With Fentanyl Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine With Fentanyl in Elective Cesarean Section.

Background In parturient posted for elective cesarean sections, a widely used local anesthetic in the subarachnoid blockade is racemic hyperbaric bupivacaine. Hyperbaric levobupivacaine, the pure S (-) isomer of bupivacaine, was introduced and has since become more widely used in India because of its short duration of motor blockade and reduced risks of neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of sensory and motor blockade and side effects of equivalent doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with opioid additive fentanyl in order to extend the duration of analgesia during elective cesarean births. Methodology A total of 130 women classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II who are undergoing elective cesarean sections were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, double-blind comparative study after providing written informed consent. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group LF, which included 65 women, obtained 25 mcg (0.5 ml) of fentanyl and 10 mg (2 ml) of hyperbaric levobupivacaine, or Group BF, which included 65 women, received 25 mcg (0.5 ml) of fentanyl and 10 mg (2 ml) of hyperbaric bupivacaine. Pinprick, cold swab, and the Bromage scale are used to assess the characteristics of sensory and motor blockade; hemodynamic alterations and adverse effects are also observed. Results The levobupivacaine group, consisting of 65 participants aged between 21 and 29 years, exhibited fewer side effects and significantly shorter durations of sensory and motor block compared to the bupivacaine group. In both groups, hemodynamic stability is comparable. Levobupivacaine provides analgesia for a significantly shorter period compared to bupivacaine. Conclusions In cesarean procedures, intrathecal hyperbaric levobupivacaine and fentanyl can be effective alternatives to hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl due to their ability to maintain hemodynamic stability while providing adequate sensory and motor blockade.

Control of hyperpnoea and pulmonary gas exchange during prolonged exercise: The role of group III/IV muscle afferent feedback.

It remains unclear whether feedback from group III/IV muscle afferents is of continuous significance for regulating the pulmonary response during prolonged (>5min), steady-state exercise. To elucidate the influence of these sensory neurons on hyperpnoea, gas exchange efficiency, arterial oxygenation and acid-base balance during prolonged locomotor exercise, 13healthy participants (4 females; 21 (3) years, : 46 (8) ml/kg/min) performed consecutive constant-load cycling bouts at ∼50% (20min), ∼75% (20min) and ∼100% (5min) of with intact (CTRL) and pharmacologically attenuated (lumbar intrathecal fentanyl; FENT) group III/IV muscle afferent feedback from the legs. Pulmonary responses were continuously recorded and arterial blood (radial catheter) periodically collected throughout the exercise. Pulmonary gas exchange efficiency was evaluated using the alveolar-arterial difference ( ). There were no differences in any of the variables of interest between conditions before the start of the exercise. Pulmonary ventilation was up to 20% lower across all intensities during FENT compared to CTRL exercise (P<0.001) and this hypoventilation was accompanied by an up to 10% lower arterial and a 2-4mmHg higher (both P<0.001). The exercise-induced widening of was up to 25% larger during FENT compared to CTRL (P<0.001). Importantly, the differences developed within the first minute of each stage and persisted, or further increased, throughout the remainder of each bout. These findings reflect a critical and time-independent significance of feedback from group III/IV leg muscle afferents for continuously regulating the ventilatory response, gas exchange efficiency, arterial oxygenation and acid-base balance during human locomotion. KEY POINTS: Feedback from group III/IV leg muscle afferents reflexly contributes to hyperpnoea during short duration (i.e. <5min) locomotor exercise. Whether continuous feedback from these sensory neurons is obligatory to ensure adequate pulmonary responses during steady-state exercise of longer duration remains unknown. Lumbar intrathecal fentanyl was used to attenuate the central projection of group III/IV leg muscle afferents during prolonged locomotor exercise (i.e. 45min) at intensities ranging from 50% to 100% of . Without affecting the metabolic rate, afferent blockade compromised pulmonary ventilation and gas exchange efficiency, consistently impairing arterial oxygenation and facilitating respiratory acidosis throughout exercise. These findings reflect the time-independent significance of feedback from group III/IV muscle afferents for regulating exercise hyperpnoea and gas exchange efficiency, and thus for optimizing arterial oxygenation and acid-base balance, during prolonged human locomotion.

Comparing the effects of intrathecal and intra-articular magnesium sulfate and fentanyl on pain after knee arthroscopy; double-blind clinical trial

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intrathecal and intra-articular magnesium sulfate (IA-Mg) and fentanyl on pain after knee arthroscopy (KA). Materials and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 2022–2023. One hundred and forty candidates for KA were randomly allocated to four groups, namely intrathecal magnesium sulfate, IA-Mg, intrathecal fentanyl (IT-F), and intra-articular fentanyl. A medical intern used a 0–10 visual analog scale to assess participants’ post-KA pain at recovery and 1, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after KA. Participants with a pain score of more than 4 were provided with intravenous pethidine 25 mg. Data were analyzed at a significance level of &lt; 0.05 and using the SPSS software (version 22.0). Results: No significant difference was found among the groups respecting participants’ arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, and KA duration (P &gt; 0.05). The mean score of pain significantly increased in all study groups (P &lt; 0.05) and the mean score of pain in the IA-Mg group was significantly less than the other groups (P = 0.001). Respecting postoperative complications, only six cases from the IT-F group experienced pruritus (P = 0.001). Conclusion: IA-Mg can significantly reduce post-KA pain and the need for postoperative analgesics. Therefore, it may be a safe and effective adjacent therapy for post-KA pain management.

Comparison of the effect of intrathecal fentanyl citrate and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5% for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries

Background: Subarachnoid blockade is a safe, reliable, and inexpensive technique that provides surgical anesthesia along with prolonged post-operative analgesia. The quality of subarachnoid block is enhanced by the addition of intrathecal adjuvants, such as fentanyl citrate and magnesium sulfate to hyperbaric levobupivacaine. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of fentanyl and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine in orthopedic surgeries under subarachnoid block. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study included 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I and II patients aged 18–60 years undergoing orthopedic surgeries. Group LS received 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine heavy+0.5 mL normal saline. Group LF received 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine heavy+fentanyl 25 μg, and Group LM, 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine heavy+magnesium sulphate 50 mg+0.4 mL normal saline. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block and intraoperative hemodynamics were recorded. In the post-operative period, duration of analgesia, Visual Analog Scales scores, and side effects were observed. Results: The onset of sensory block was 4.04±0.74 min in Group LM (P&lt;0.001) as compared to Groups LF (2.01±0.23 min) and LS (2±0.24 min). The onset of motor blockade took 5±1.14 min in the control group, 7.01±0.94 in group LF, and 8.11±1.33 min in group LM (P&lt;0.001). The duration of analgesia in group LS was 183.73±12.08 min, 317±18.6 min in group LF, and 219.43±20.89 in group LM (P&lt;0.001). Conclusion: The addition of fentanyl and magnesium as adjuvants enhanced the quality of subarachnoid block when added to hyperbaric levobupivacaine. The duration of analgesia was longest in fentanyl, followed by magnesium and then control. The incidence of side effects was greatest in fentanyl, followed by control and nil in magnesium.

A comparative study to assess the effects of intrathecal fentanyl and intrathecal tramadol combined with 0.5% bupivacaine heavy in patients undergoing elective urological surgeries: A prospective randomized study

Background: Urological operations frequently involve the use of spinal anesthesia. In the present scenario, adding different adjuvants to local anesthetic improve its quality and duration has become common. Aims and Objectives: In patients undergoing elective urological procedures, the purpose of this study was to assess the effects of intrathecal fentanyl or tramadol with 0.5% bupivacaine heavy. Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into two groups of 30 patients each, a total of 60 patients aged 20–60 years undergoing elective urological surgeries participated in this prospective, randomized study in which 25 μg fentanyl and 2.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine heavy were given to Group F, while 25 mg tramadol and 2.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine heavy were given to Group M. The onset and duration of sensory and motor blockage, the duration of analgesia, post-operative Visual Analog Scale score, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effects were evaluated. Results: Fentanyl had a lower mean time of onset for sensory (2:33±0:22 min vs. 4:50±0:33 min) and motor block (3:36±0:28 min vs. 5:52±0:38 min) (P&lt;0.001), the duration of sensory (185.67±3.155 min vs. 152.60±4.264), motor block (172.00±4.177 min vs. 136.40±5.575 min), and post-operative analgesia was longer in the fentanyl group (P&lt;0.001), whereas the incidence of adverse effects such as pruritus, shivering, and nausea was lower in the tramadol group. Conclusion: The quality and duration of spinal anesthesia were found to be significantly increased by the use of fentanyl as an adjuvant in our study. However, tramadol also produced stable hemodynamics and exhibited fewer adverse effects than fentanyl.

Comparison of Fentanyl With Midazolam As Adjuvants to Levobupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Sections: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and objectives Spinal anesthesia stands as a cornerstone for patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS), offering advantages like faster onset and high block density. Levobupivacaine, known for its high potency and long-acting nature, has a slower onset. The safety of intrathecal fentanyl or midazolam is evaluated as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in parturients. This study aims to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia provided by fentanyl or midazolam added to 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine in elective cesarean sections. Secondary objectives include evaluating the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Identifying the more effective adjuvant will help optimize spinal anesthesia protocols, improve postoperative outcomes, and enhance patient comfort and recovery. Methods This study was conducted at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, India, over six months (May 1, 2023, to October 1, 2023). A total of 90 patients undergoing elective LSCS received spinal anesthesia in a prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial. Patients were allocated to three groups: Group A received levobupivacaine with fentanyl, Group B received levobupivacaine with midazolam, and Group C received levobupivacaine with normal saline. Block characteristics, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic stability, and complications were assessed. Assessments were conducted at specified time points: intraoperatively, every five minutes for the first 30 minutes, every 10 minutes for the next hour, every two hours for six hours, and every four hours up to 24 hours postoperatively. Statistical analysis utilized one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Group B (levobupivacaine with midazolam) exhibited a shorter time to sensory block onset (88 seconds) compared to Groups A and C (both 145 seconds) (p < 0.001). Group A (levobupivacaine with fentanyl) showed a shorter time to maximum motor block (p = 0.045) than Groups B and C. The sensory block duration was significantly longer in Group A (127.5 minutes) compared to Group B (60 minutes) and Group C (69 minutes) (p < 0.001). Motor block duration was also prolonged in Group A (251 minutes) compared to Group B (147 minutes) and Group C (177 minutes) (p = 0.045). The first analgesic requirement was delayed in Group A (248 minutes), whereas Groups B (115 minutes) and C (90 minutes) (p < 0.001) required more frequent analgesia. Group A experienced a higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conclusion Midazolam accelerated sensory block onset, while fentanyl prolonged anesthesia duration without significantly affecting motor block. Fentanyl delayed the first analgesic requirement, whereas midazolam reduced postoperative nausea, vomiting, and shivering.

Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Nalbuphine versus Intrathecal Fentanyl as Adjuvant to 0.5% Bupivacaine for Cesarian Section under Spinal Anaesthesia

Abstract Background One of the main objectives of anesthesia is to alleviate the patient’s pain and agony, by ensuring the performance of surgical procedures without any discomfort. Elimination of postoperative pain is indispensable due to the central, peripheral and immunological stress response to tissue injury. So there is a need for extended analgesia without any side effects to achieve this goal. The use of opioids in intrathecal or epidural anesthesia has become common to increase postoperative analgesia. However, opioid-induced side effects, such as respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention and pruritus, limit their use. Objective To assess the postoperative analgesic requirements and the spinally mediated analgesic effects of intrathecal nalbuphine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine after cesarean section in comparison to intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl. Methods This randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals’ operating rooms on 48 patients undergoing cesarean section within a period of six months after approval of ethical committee of Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University. Results This study showed that the addition of a small dose of nalbuphine or fentanyl to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia prolonged the time of postoperative analgesia. In this study, there was no significant difference regarding the demographic data, duration of operation, maximum sensory level, and maximum motor blockade level. Adding to this, there was also no significant changes regarding the vital data of the patients. On the other hand, there was a significant difference regarding the duration of analgesia which was longer with nalbuphine. It was also noticed that with nalbuphine less patients required rescue analgesia in comparison to fentanyl. There was higher number of side effects recorded with fentanyl in comparison to nalbuphine. Conclusion Either intrathecal nalbuphine (0.8 mg) or intrathecal fentanyl (25 μg) combined with Bupivacaine improves intraoperative analgesia and prolongs post- operative analgesia in cesarean section. There was statistically significant difference between them, intrathecal nalbuphine had a prolonged duration of post-operative analgesia, lesser amount of rescue analgesia needed and fewer side effects than intrathecal fentanyl.

Impact of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine versus Intrathecal Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine on Post Spinal Urinary Retention in Knee Joint Arthroscopic Surgeries

Abstract Background Patients undergoing orthopedic surgery are prone to developing postoperative urinary retention (POUR). They have an estimated relative risk of 8% to 55% higher than other surgical patients. This inability to void increases patient’s risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and bacteremia, and can lead to chronic voiding difficulties due to bladder architecture alterations. A great degree of variability exists among studies describing the prevalence and risk factors of postoperative urinary retention and its management strategies. Objective To compare the effects of Dexmedetomidine or Fentanyl added to intrathecal bupivacaine in knee arthroscopic procedures in terms of the occurrence of postoperative urinary retention. Patients and Methods This prospective randomized clinical study was conducted at tertiary care hospital at Ain Shams University hospitals from September 2021 till Mars 2022 and performed on a total of 70 patients who assigned for knee joints orthoscopic surgery. Results The current study results revealed that the incidence of postoperative urine retention in dexmedetomidine group was 5.7% while was 28.6% in Fentanyl group, the difference was statistically significant. however, the need to postoperative urinary catheterization was statistically non-significantly among the two groups. The current study results revealed that the Time to achieve maximum block was significantly shorter in dexmedetomidine group and the duration of motor block statistically was significantly longer in dexmedetomidine group. Conclusion On the basis of current evidence, when compared to fentanyl, our study revealed that intrathecal dexmedetomidine, as adjuvant to local anesthetics for intrathecal injection, can statistically significantly prolong the duration of sensory and motor block, as well as the pain free period, meanwhile significantly reducing the incidence of urinary retention. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine seems to be an attractive alternative as an adjuvant to spinal bupivacaine in surgical procedures, especially those requiring long time. It has excellent quality of postoperative analgesia with minimal side effects.

A Comparison of Subarachnoid Block Characteristics Following Co-administration of Fentanyl Premixed With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Versus Antecedent or Succedent to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background Adjuvants are often used during subarachnoid block to enhance and prolong the analgesia and decrease the adverse effects of high doses of local anesthetic agents. Intrathecal fentanyl premixed with hyperbaric bupivacaine has been used in spinal anesthesia and compared with the sequential use of these drugs in separate syringes. However, given the paucity of literature, we conducted this study where premixed antecedent and succedent administration of intrathecal fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine were compared in terms of flow dynamics, block characteristics, and hemodynamic alterations. Methodology This prospective, randomized, triple-blinded comparative study was conducted among 160 patients who were randomly allocated into four groups. Group A (n = 40) (control) received 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mL of normal saline via a 5.0 mL syringe. Group B (n = 40) received 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mL (25 µg) of fentanyl premixed via a single 5.0 mL syringe. Group C (n = 40) received 0.5 mL (25 µg) of fentanyl via a 1.0 mL syringe followed by 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine via a 5.0 mL syringe. Group D (n = 40) received 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine via a 5.0 mL syringe followed by 0.5 mL (25 µg) of fentanyl via a 1.0 mL syringe. The onset and regression of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic parameters, time to first rescue analgesia, and adverse events were observed. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results The mean time taken for the onset of sensory and motor blockade was least in Group D followed by Group C. Duration of sensory and motor blockade was prolonged in Group D. Patients in Group A experienced more hypotension than Groups B, C, and D. Requirement of rescue analgesia was delayed in Groups C and D. Conclusions Administering 25 µg (0.5 mL) of Fentanyl separately after 15 mg (3.0 mL) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine results in early onset and prolonged duration of sensory and motor blockade, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, the delayed requirement of rescue analgesia postoperatively, and fewer side effects compared to its co-administration as a premixed solution or antecedent to hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Comparison of effectiveness of intrathecal dexmedetomidine v/s intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in elective infraumbilical gynaecological surgeries

Comparison of effectiveness of intrathecal dexmedetomidine v/s intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in elective infraumbilical gynaecological surgeries

Intrathecal Fentanyl versus Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Isobaric Levobupivacaine 0.5% in Elective Cesarean Sections: A Randomized Control Trial

Background: When a cesarean section is performed, it is crucial to have access to good postoperative analgesia. To achieve this, adjuvants are added along with local anesthetics as it has a synergistic action to improve its duration and quality. Alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists and opioids such as dexmedetomidine and fentanyl, respectively, are used for their sedative, analgesic, and perioperative sympatholytic and cardiovascular stabilizing effects with reduced anesthetic requirements. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effects of intrathecal fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine combined with levobupivacaine on postoperative analgesia and hemodynamic changes. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective randomized control trial, among 50 patients undergoing elective cesarean section. Group 1 will receive 0.5% levobupivacaine 2 ml + fentanyl 25 mcg and Group 2 will receive 0.5% levobupivacaine + dexmedetomidine 5 mcg. Duration of analgesia and onset and duration of sensory-motor block, perioperative analgesic requirements, sedation, and hemodynamic stability were compared. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS 16. Results: The baseline characteristics such as age and gender, weight, height, and body mass index were not statistically significant in both the groups. Duration of analgesia was significantly longer in the dexmedetomidine group than the fentanyl group. The mean time of onset of motor block in the group, for which dexmedetomidine was 14.23 ± 1.85 min and it was found to be much earlier than the local anesthetic group. All the patients in the dexmedetomidine group had a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 0 (no pain) at the end of 4 h. In contrast, only 21 patients in the fentanyl group had a VAS score of 0, and four patients had a VAS score of 2, indicating mild pain requiring no treatment. Conclusion: The study showed that both fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in cesarean section showed a longer duration of analgesia with increased sedation score and lesser pain score. When comparing the both, dexmedetomidine to the levobupivacaine has a more effective effect on postoperative pain management than fentanyl.

Effectiveness of intrathecal dexmedetomidine vs fentanyl as additives to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in women undergoing cesarean section: a systematic review protocol.

The aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of intrathecal dexmedetomidine vs fentanyl as additives to hyperbaric bupivacaine in providing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. Pain following cesarean section remains a challenge, with limited treatment options due to potential undesirable parturient and neonatal side effects. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine has emerged as a favorable alternative to opioid additives to hyperbaric bupivacaine in prolonging postoperative analgesia, but its effectiveness requires further investigation. The review will evaluate studies of patients who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia where dexmedetomidine and fentanyl were compared as intrathecal additives to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia. This review will consider randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and prospective cohort studies for inclusion. No limits regarding publication date or language will be applied. A preliminary search of PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials has been conducted to identify relevant index terms and keywords, which will be applied in a second search across PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Embase. Google Scholar, National Library of Medicine (Clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform will be searched to identify unpublished literature. Full-text studies will be subjected to an assessment of methodological quality, and data extraction will be performed independently by 2 reviewers. The results will be presented in both tabular and narrative format and, where possible, pooled into a meta-analysis. A Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings will be created to grade the certainty of evidence of the reported outcomes. PROSPERO CRD42022364815.

Effect of an increased dose of intrathecal fentanyl on cesarean delivery anesthesia at a Texas level IV maternal care center

Background We hypothesized that increasing our intrathecal fentanyl dose for cesarean delivery from 10 µg to 15 µg would result in fewer patients receiving a rescue analgesia intervention. Methods Patients who had a cesarean delivery from February 15, 2021 to February 14, 2023 and received a single injection spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthetic for cesarean delivery were eligible for inclusion. We defined a rescue analgesia intervention as administration of local anesthetic through an epidural catheter, administration of systemic anesthetic adjuvant medication, or conversion to general anesthesia. Results A total of 520 and 556 patients received 10 µg and 15 µg of intrathecal fentanyl for cesarean delivery, respectively, of which 154 (29.6%) and 122 (21.9%) patients required rescue analgesia interventions, respectively (P = 0.004). The odds ratio for receiving a rescue analgesia intervention was 0.668 (95% confidence interval 0.507 to 0.880; P = 0.004) for patients who received 15 µg of intrathecal fentanyl compared to 10 µg. Conclusion Following implementation of an increased dose of intrathecal fentanyl, patients who received 15 µg of intrathecal fentanyl for cesarean delivery were approximately 33% less likely to require a rescue analgesia intervention during cesarean delivery compared to patients who received 10 µg.

Randomised control trial comparing postoperative analgesia between nalbuphine and fentanyl as an adjuvant with intrathecal levobupivacaine for lower abdominal gynaecological surgeries

Background Effective post-operative pain management is crucial for patient comfort and recovery following lower abdominal gynaecological surgeries. This study protocol outlines a randomised control trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of two intrathecal adjuvants, nalbuphine and fentanyl, in conjunction with hyperbaric levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia. Methods The study will be conducted at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, DMIMS (DU), and affiliated institutions. Sixty eligible patients aged 35-75 years undergoing lower abdominal gynaecological surgeries under subarachnoid block will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group A will receive nalbuphine with levobupivacaine, while Group B will receive fentanyl with levobupivacaine. Patients will be monitored for the duration of post-operative analgesia, onset of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic effects, and side effects. Outcomes The primary outcome is the comparison of post-operative analgesia duration between nalbuphine and fentanyl. Secondary outcomes include assessing sensory and motor block onset, hemodynamic changes, ephedrine usage, and side effects. Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecal nalbuphine and fentanyl as adjuvants with hyperbaric levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in lower abdominal gynaecological surgeries.

Incidence of hypotension in lower segment Caesarean section - a comparison of intrathecal Fentanyl- Bupivacaine combination with Bupivacaine alone

Introduction: After subarachnoid block with conventional heavy Bupivacaine, hypotension is the most common complication and is caused by decrease in systemic vascular resistance and/or cardiac output. Even with standard doses of the drug for parturient, there are evidences of severe hypotension and other complications despite adequate analgesia and anaesthesia. Adjuvants are used to enhance the quality of blocks with less complications. Objectives: It was to evaluate the effectiveness of combining bupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anesthesia during lower segment Caesarean section (LSCS) as opposed to using bupivacaine alone for the incidence of hypotension. Methodology: This is a prospective study of 210 patients aged 18-35 years of American society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status II undergoing elective lower segment Caesarean section, randomly assigned to two groups: Group A, received a mixture of intrathecal 2ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine and 10 mcg Fentanyl(2.2ml) and Group B, received only 2.2 ml of Bupivacaine. Noninvasive blood pressure was checked at 1,2,4,6,10,20,40 and 60 min after subarachnoid block and then post-surgery. Results: The occurrence of hypotension was higher in Group B (26.6%) compared to Group A (8.6%). Conclusion: Our study suggests that the intrathecal Fentanyl-Bupivacaine combination is effective in reducing the incidence of hypotension after SAB for elective LSCS. Additional research is needed to determine this combination’s optimal dosage and timing.

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesia Between Intrathecal Nalbuphine and Intrathecal Fentanyl in Infraumbilical Surgeries: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Spinal anesthesia is a widely used regional anesthesia technique for surgeries below the umbilicus, butpostoperative analgesia is of major concern due to the relatively short duration of the local anesthetic. Various drugs were used as an additive to local anesthetic to prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia. This study aims to compare the efficacy ofnalbuphine and fentanyl as an intrathecal additive along with local anesthetic. A total of 166 patients aged between 18 and 65 years belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) I and II undergoing elective infraumbilical surgeries were included in the prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial. The patients were allocated into two groups of 83 each. Group N was given 2.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 1 mg of nalbuphine (0.5 mL), and group F received 2.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 25 mcg fentanyl (0.5 mL). Both groups were compared for postoperative analgesia, onset and duration ofboth sensory and motor blockade, intraoperative hemodynamics, and side effects. All demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects were not statistically significant among the two groups. However, other parameters, such as the mean duration of analgesia, which was 267.27 ±172.099 minutes in group N and 161.35 ±14.957 minutes in group F; meantime for the onset of sensory blockade, whichwas 3.94 ±1.769 minutes in group N and 5.94 ±0.929 minutesin group F; onset of complete motor blockade, which was 7.10 ±1.858 minutes in group N and 11.61 ±1.218 minutes in group F; duration of motor blockade, which was 182.57 ±13.011 minutes in group N and 112.53 ±7.389 minutes in group F;and mean time taken for two-segment regression, which was 118.20 ±12.61 minutes in group N and 113.72 ±8.84 minutes in group F, were all comparable between the two groups. Nalbuphine was found to be more efficacious for prolongation of postoperative analgesia with better hemodynamic stability.