Intraoperative Vasopressor Research Articles

Re-operation Following Urgent and Emergent Colectomies: An Investigation of Indications and Utility as a Quality Indicator

BackgroundFor urgent and emergent colectomies, return to the operating room is interpreted as a negative quality indicator. We sought to describe indications, procedures performed, and outcomes of patients undergoing reoperation after colectomy. MethodsRetrospective study of patients undergoing urgent and emergent colectomy with re-operation at a single institution from 2013 to 2023. Details of the patients and surgeries indexed. Results117 patients met the study criteria. Sepsis prior to surgery was noted in 29% of patients, intraoperative vasopressors were used in 80% and 52% were left in gastrointestinal discontinuity. Among re-operations, 60% of patients underwent a “planned second look”, 17% had a supportive procedure, and 23% had an unplanned re-operation, the latter group most reflective of surgical complications. ConclusionPatients undergoing urgent and emergent colectomies are very ill at presentation. Planned second look and supportive procedures account for most re-operations, suggesting the current utilization of re-operation as a quality indicator is flawed.

Intraoperative Vasopressors and Delirium: Reply.

Intraoperative Vasopressors and Delirium: Reply.

Comparative outcomes of cemented versus cementless stems in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.

We aimed to compare the clinical and surgical outcomes of cemented vs uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Patients (n = 99) without preoperative cardiopulmonary problems undergoing bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture between August 2015 and February 2019 were randomly divided into cemented (group C) and uncemented (group U) stem fixation groups. Mean operative time, mean intraoperative blood loss, and percentage of intraoperative use of vasopressors, pre- and postoperative activities of daily living (ADL), incidence of postoperative complications, and radiological evaluation of stem alignment were evaluated. A total of 99 patients were included (group C, n = 42; group U, n = 57). Group C had a significantly longer mean operative time (P < .001) and a significantly higher percentage of intraoperative vasopressor use as compared to group U (P < .05). In contrast, the amount of intraoperative blood loss was similar between the 2 groups (P = .30). Likewise, there was no statistically significant difference in pre- and postoperative ADL performance between the groups (P = .70 and .44, respectively). Postoperative computed tomography revealed that stem anteversion was higher in group C than in group U (P < .05). Cemented and uncemented stems were equivalent in terms of blood loss and postoperative complications in patients with femoral neck fractures. Uncemented stem showed advantages in reducing operative time and intraoperative vasopressor administration. Also, fixation method was not investigated in this study.

Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated With the Development of Persistent Acute Kidney Injury in Non-Renal Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Persistent acute kidney injury (pAKI), compared with acute kidney injury (AKI) that resolves in <72h, is associated with worse prognosis in critically ill patients. Definitions and prognosis of pAKI are not well characterized in solid organ transplant patients. Our aims were to investigate (a) definitions and incidence of pAKI; (b) association with clinical outcomes; and (c) risk factors for pAKI among heart, lung, and liver transplant recipients. We systematically reviewed the literature including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane from inception to 8/1/2023 for human prospective and retrospective studies reporting on the development of pAKI in heart, lung, or liver transplant recipients. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochran's Q and I2. We identified 25 studies including 6330 patients. AKI (8%-71.6%) and pAKI (2.7%-55.1%) varied widely. Definitions of pAKI included 48-72h (six studies), 7days (three studies), 14days (four studies), or more (12 studies). Risk factors included age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, preoperative chronic kidney disease (CKD), intraoperative vasopressor use, and intraoperative circulatory support. pAKI was associated with new onset of CKD (odds ratio [OR] 1.41-11.2), graft dysfunction (OR 1.81-8.51), and long-term mortality (OR 3.01-13.96), although significant heterogeneity limited certainty of CKD and graft dysfunction outcome analyses. pAKI is common and is associated with worse mortality among liver and lung transplant recipients. Standardization of the nomenclature of AKI will be important in future studies (PROSPERO CRD42022371952).

Effects of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure on intraoperative oxygenation and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients requiring pneumoperitoneum with Trendelenburg position: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Whether individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) improves intraoperative oxygenation and reduces postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether individualized PEEP is associated with improved intraoperative oxygenation and reduce PPCs for patients needing pneumoperitoneum with the Trendelenburg position during surgery. Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and www.clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of individualized PEEP on intraoperative oxygenation and PPCs in patients who required Trendelenburg positioning with pneumoperitoneum. The primary outcome was the oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2) during the procedure. Secondary outcomes included PPCs, intraoperative respiratory mechanics (driving pressure, compliance), and vasopressor consumption. DerSimonian-Laird random effects models were used to calculate mean differences (MDs) and log risk ratios (log RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool 2.0 was applied to assess the risk of bias in included studies. The protocol of this meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO. We included 14 studies (1121 patients) that employed different individualized PEEP strategies. Compared with control groups, individualized PEEP groups exhibited a significantly improved intraoperative PaO2/FiO2 (MD=56.52mm Hg, 95% CI: [33.98, 79.06], P<0.001) and reduced incidence of PPCs (log RR=-0.50, 95% CI: [-0.84, -0.16], P=0.004). Individualized PEEP reduced driving pressure while improving respiratory compliance. Intraoperative vasopressor consumption was similar between both groups. The weighted mean PEEP in the individual PEEP groups was 13.2 [95% CI, 11.7, 14.6] cmH2O. No evidence indicated that one individualized PEEP strategy is superior to others. Individualized PEEP seems to work positively for lung protection in the Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Warfarin, not direct oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy, is associated with increased bleeding risk in emergency general surgery patients: Implications in this new era of novel anticoagulants: An EAST multicenter study.

This study aimed to assess perioperative bleeding complications and in-hospital mortality in patients requiring emergency general surgery presenting with a history of antiplatelet (AP) versus direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus warfarin use. A prospective observational study across 21 centers between 2019 and 2022 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, and DOAC, warfarin, or AP use within 24 hours of an emergency general surgery procedure. Outcomes included perioperative bleeding and in-hospital mortality. The study was conducted using analysis of variance, χ 2 , and multivariable regression models. Of the 413 patients, 221 (53.5%) reported AP use, 152 (36.8%) DOAC use, and 40 (9.7%) warfarin use. The most common indications for surgery were obstruction (23% [AP], 45% [DOAC], and 28% [warfarin]), intestinal ischemia (13%, 17%, and 23%), and diverticulitis/peptic ulcers (7%, 7%, and 15%). Compared with DOAC use, warfarin use was associated with significantly higher perioperative bleeding complication (odds ratio [OR], 4.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0-9.9]). There was no significant difference in perioperative bleeding complication between DOAC and AP use (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.4-1.1]). Compared with DOAC use, there was no significant difference in mortality between warfarin use (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.2-2.5]) or AP use (OR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.2-1.2]). After adjusting for confounders, warfarin use (OR, 6.3 [95% CI, 2.8-13.9]), medical history, and operative indication were associated with an increase in perioperative bleeding complications. However, warfarin was not independently associated with risk of mortality (OR, 1.3 [95% CI, 0.39-4.7]), whereas intraoperative vasopressor use (OR, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.7-12.8]), medical history, and postoperative bleeding (OR, 5.5 [95% CI, 2.4-12.8]) were. Despite ongoing concerns about the increase in DOAC use and lack of readily available reversal agents, this study suggests that warfarin, rather than DOACs, is associated with higher perioperative bleeding complications. However, that risk does not result in an increase in mortality, suggesting that perioperative decisions should be dictated by patient disease and comorbidities rather than type of AP or anticoagulant use. Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Vasopressor use in partial flap necrosis in free flap transplant patients with vascular comorbidities: A retrospective study

Intraoperative use of vasopressors in free flap surgeries is controversially debated. The predominant concern is that pedicle blood supply will decrease leading to post-operative complications. This study examined the role of intraoperative vasopressors, specifically norepinephrine, in free flap partial necrosis based on the patients’ comorbidities. We retrospectively analyzed 192 patients who received free flap treatment between 2006 and 2021 and were stratified based on vascular comorbidities. We assessed the role of intraoperative vasopressors using multivariate analysis. Patients who were administered vasopressors did not have a significantly higher risk of partial flap necrosis compared to patients who were not administered vasopressors (OR: 1.439, 95% CI: 0.618-3.348, p=0.399). Upon stratifying by vascular comorbidities, we found that patients with two or more vascular comorbidities who were administered vasopressors had a significantly higher risk of developing flap necrosis (OR: 3.882, 95% CI: 1.266-14.752, p=0.046), indicating that vasopressor use in patients with multiple vascular comorbidities is a risk factor for partial flap necrosis. To minimize the risk of flap marginal necrosis in patients with vascular comorbidities, we recommend limited use of vasopressors or minimizing the flap area to preserve vascularization.

The Impact of Intraoperative Vasopressor Use and Fluid Status on Flap Survival in Traumatic Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

Historically, the use of intraoperative vasopressors during free flap lower extremity (LE) reconstruction has been proposed to adversely affect flap survival due to concerns about compromising flap perfusion. This study aims to analyze the impact of intraoperative vasopressor use and fluid administration on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing traumatic LE reconstruction. Patients who underwent LE free flap reconstruction between 2015 and 2023 at a Level I Trauma Center were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between vasopressor use and intraoperative fluids with partial/complete flap necrosis, as well as the differential effect of vasopressor use on flap outcomes based on varying fluid levels. A total of 105 LE flaps were performed over 8 years. Vasopressors were administered intraoperatively to 19 (18.0%) cases. Overall flap survival and limb salvage rates were 97.1 and 93.3%, respectively. Intraoperative vasopressor use decreased the overall risk of postoperative flap necrosis (OR 0.00005, 95% CI [9.11 × 10-9-0.285], p = 0.025), while a lower net fluid balance increased the risk of this outcome (OR 0.9985, 95% CI [0.9975-0.9996], p = 0.007). Further interaction analysis revealed that vasopressor use increased the risk of flap necrosis in settings with a higher net fluid balance (OR 1.0032, 95% CI [1.0008-1.0056], p-interaction =0.010). This study demonstrated that intraoperative vasopressor use and adequate fluid status may be beneficial in improving flap outcomes in LE reconstruction. Vasopressor use with adequate fluid management can optimize hemodynamic stability when necessary during traumatic LE microvascular reconstruction without concern for increased risk of flap ischemia.

Defining Surgical Difficulty During Open Right Lobe Donor Hepatectomy and its Prediction Using Preoperative Donor Computed Tomography Morphometry

BackgroundThere is no accepted way to define difficult donor hepatectomy (DiffDH) during open right living donor hepatectomy (ORLDH). There are also no studies exploring association between DiffDH and early donor outcomes or reliable pre-operative predictors of DiffDH. MethodsConsecutive ORLDH performed over 18 months at a single center were included. Intra-operative parameters were used to develop an objective definition of DiffDH. The impact of DiffDH on early postoperative outcomes and achievement of textbook outcome (TO) was evaluated. Donor morphometry data on axial and coronal sections of donor CT at the level of portal bifurcation were collected. Donor and graft factors predictive of DiffDH were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. ResultsOne hundred and eleven donors (Male-40.5%, Age-34± 9.5 years) underwent ORLDH during the study period. Difficulty score was constructed using five intra-operative parameters i.e. operating time, transection time, estimated blood loss, need for intra-operative vasopressors and need for Pringle maneuver. Donors were classified as DiffDH (score ≥ 2) or Standard DH (score<2). Twenty nine donors (26%) were classified as DiffDH. DiffDH donors suffered greater all cause morbidity (p=0.004) but not major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score>2; p=0.651), more peri-operative transfusion (p=0.013), increased post-operative SIRS (p=0.034), delay in achieving full oral diet (p=0.047) and a 70% reduced chance of achieving TO as compared to StDH (p=0.007). On logistic regression analysis, increasing right lobe antero-posterior depth (RLdepth) was identified as an independent predictor of DiffDH (Odds ratio- 2.0(95% ci =1.2,3.3), p<0.006). ROC curve analysis identified RLdepth>14 cms as the best predictor of DiffDH (Sensitivity-79%, specificity-66%, Area under curve=0.803, p<0.001). ConclusionWe report a novel definition of DiffDH and show that it is associated with worse post-operative outcomes, including a lesser chance of achieving TO. We also report that DiffDH can be predicted from readily available donor CT parameters.

Perioperative outcomes and causes of postpartum hemorrhage in patients undergoing cesarean delivery in Thailand: A comprehensive retrospective study.

This study aimed to identify the characteristics, causes, perioperative anesthetic, and obstetric outcomes of patients experiencing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) after cesarean delivery. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent cesarean delivery at the largest university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, during a 5-year period (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2020). PPH was defined as an estimated blood loss (EBL) of ≥ 1000 ml within 24 hours postpartum. Of 17 187 cesarean deliveries during the study period, 649 patients were included for analysis. The mean EBL was 1774.3 ± 1564.4 ml (range: 1000-26 000 ml). Among the patients, 166 (25.6%) experienced massive PPH (blood loss > 2000 ml). Intraoperative blood transfusions were necessary for 264 patients (40.7%), while 504 individuals (77.7%) needed intraoperative vasopressors. The analysis revealed uterine atony as the leading cause of PPH in 62.7% (n = 407) of the patients, with abnormal placentation following at 29.3% (n = 190). Abnormal placentation was associated with a significantly higher mean EBL of 2345.0 ± 2303.9 ml compared to uterine atony, which had a mean EBL of 1504.0 ± 820.7 ml (P < 0.001). Abnormal placentation also significantly increased the likelihood of blood transfusions and hysterectomies (P < 0.001 for both) and led to more intensive care unit admissions (P = 0.032). The risk of EBL exceeding 2000 ml was markedly higher in patients with abnormal placentation (odds ratio [OR] 5.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.45-7.57, P < 0.001) and in cases involving trauma to the internal organs (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.16-4.71, P = 0.018) than in patients with uterine atony. The study documented three instances of perioperative cardiac arrest, one of which was fatal. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive perioperative management strategies, including the ready availability of adequate blood and blood products, particularly in scenarios predisposed to significant hemorrhage. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrial.gov registration number NCT04833556 (April 6, 2021).

Impact of a Dexmedetomidine Intravenous Infusion in Septic Dogs: Preliminary Study.

The purpose of this study was to determine if a continuous rate infusion (CRI) of dexmedetomidine decreases vasopressor requirements in septic dogs undergoing surgery. Vital parameters, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, vasopressor requirement, and 28-day mortality were recorded. Dogs were randomly divided into two groups: a dexmedetomidine (DEX) (1 mcg/kg/h) group and a control group (NaCl), which received an equivalent CRI of NaCl. Dogs were premedicated with fentanyl 5 mcg/kg IV, induced with propofol, and maintained with sevoflurane and a variable rate fentanyl infusion. DEX or NaCl infusions were started 10 min prior to induction. Fluid-responsive hypotensive patients received repeated Ringer's lactate boluses (2 mL/kg) until stable or they were no longer fluid-responsive. Patients that remained hypotensive following fluid boluses received norepinephrine at a starting dose of 0.05 mcg/kg/min, with increases of 0.05 mcg/kg/min. Rescue adrenaline boluses were administered (0.001 mg/kg) if normotension was not achieved within 30 min of starting norepinephrine. The NaCl group received a significantly higher dose of norepinephrine (0.8, 0.4-2 mcg/kg/min) than the DEX group (0.12, 0-0.86 mcg/kg/min). Mortality was statistically lower in the DEX group (1/10) vs. the NaCl group (5/6). Results of this study suggest that a 1 mcg/kg/h CRI of dexmedetomidine decreases the demand for intraoperative vasopressors and may improve survival in septic dogs.

Comparative evaluation of the perioperative anesthesia methods for cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenal resections are one of the most traumatic and technically complex interventions in abdominal surgery. The correct anesthetic management and pain relief allow to substantially reduce the risk of perioperative complications, which remains high even in high-volume oncology centers with extensive experience. Finding new components and methods of anesthesia combined with evaluation of their effectiveness and safety remains a pressing issue.&#x0D; AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using intravenous lidocaine infusion as a component of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in cancer patients during pancreatoduodenal resection.&#x0D; MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the course of anesthesia, operation and postoperative period of 43 patients (mean age 63.2±7.1 years) undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. For the purposes of the study, patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, based on anesthesia method: for the first group (n=19) we used epidural analgesia as a component of perioperative anesthesia, for the second group (n=24) we used prolonged intravenous infusion of lidocaine at an average dose of 1 mg/(kg×h). We analyzed the severity of pain syndrome according to Numeric rating scale for pain in postoperative period, as well as opioid requirement, the time of gastrointestinal function recovery, and post-operative complications frequency. In order to prevent systemic toxicity, drug monitoring was carried out — the determination of the plasma concentration of lidocaine.&#x0D; RESULTS: Perioperative opioid requirement was comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences observed. The degree of pain syndrome according to the Numeric rating scale for pain did not differ statistically, except for the number of points during activation on day 3: 4.00 (95% confidence interval 3.49–4.51) for epidural analgesia group, compared to 3.12 (95% confidence interval 2.64–3.61) for lidocaine infusion group, p=0.014. There was also a statistically significant increase in infusion volume for epidural analgesia group compared to lidocaine infusion group [8.83 ml/(kg×h) (Q1=7.90; Q3=10.06) and 7.33 ml/(kg×h) (Q1=6.28–Q3=8.49) respectively, p=0.034], as well as a greater need for intraoperative vasopressor support among the patients [15 (78.9%) and 10 (43.5%) respectively, p=0.029]. In the lidocaine group, the time to onset of peristalsis was significantly shorter than in the epidural analgesia group [median 48.0 h (Q1=48.00; Q3=72.00) compared to median 60.0 h (Q1=36.00; Q3=64.50) respectively, p=0.042]. The frequency of postoperative complications did not differ between the groups.&#x0D; CONCLUSION: Based on a comparative analysis of the study results, it can be concluded that prolonged intravenous infusion of lidocaine, as a component of perioperative anesthetic protection during pancreatoduodenal resections, is safe and comparable in terms of analgesic efficacy to epidural blockade.

A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator-Derived Predictive Model for Postoperative Respiratory Failure in a Heterogeneous Adult Elective Surgery Patient Population

Postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) is associated with increased hospital charges and worse patient outcomes. Reliable prediction models can help to guide postoperative planning to optimize care, to guide resource allocation, and to foster shared decision-making with patients. Can a predictive model be developed to accurately identify patients at high risk of PRF? In this single-site proof-of-concept study, we used structured query language to extract, transform, and load electronic health record data from 23,999 consecutive adult patients admitted for elective surgery (2014-2021). Our primary outcome was PRF, defined as mechanical ventilation after surgery of > 48 h. Predictors of interest included demographics, comorbidities, and intraoperative factors. We used logistic regression to build a predictive model and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator procedure to select variables and to estimate model coefficients. We evaluated model performance using optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating curve and area under the precision-recall curve and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Brier scores. Two hundred twenty-five patients (0.94%) demonstrated PRF. The 18-variable predictive model included: operations on the cardiovascular, nervous, digestive, urinary, or musculoskeletal system; surgical specialty orthopedic (nonspine); Medicare or Medicaid (as the primary payer); race unknown; American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥ III; BMI of 30 to 34.9 kg/m2; anesthesia duration (per hour); net fluid at end of the operation (per liter); median intraoperative FIO2, end title CO2, heart rate, and tidal volume; and intraoperative vasopressor medications. The optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating curve was 0.835 (95% CI,0.808-0.862) and the area under the precision-recall curve was 0.156 (95% CI, 0.105-0.203). This single-center proof-of-concept study demonstrated that a structured query language extract, transform, and load process, based on readily available patient and intraoperative variables, can be used to develop a prediction model for PRF. This PRF prediction model is scalable for multicenter research. Clinical applications include decision support to guide postoperative level of care admission and treatment decisions.

Factors Associated with 1-Year Mortality in Elderly Patients (Age ≥ 80 Years) with Cancer Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The number of elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery is increasing, but the factors affecting their postoperative outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with 1-year mortality among elderly patients (age ≥ 80 years) with cancer undergoing major abdominal surgery. This retrospective cohort study was conducted from March 2009 to December 2020. The study enrolled 378 patients 80 years old or older who underwent major abdominal surgery. The main outcome was 1-year mortality, and the factors associated with mortality were analyzed. Of the 378 patients, 92 died at 1 year (24.3%), whereas the 30-day mortality rate was 4% (n = 15). In the multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with 1-year mortality were preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) score higher than 1 (odds ratio [OR], 3.189; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.595-6.377; p = 0.001), preoperative weight loss greater than 3 kg (OR, 2.145; 95% CI, 1.044-4.404; p = 0.038), use of an intraoperative vasopressor (OR, 3.090; 95% CI, 1.188-8.042; p = 0.021), and postoperative red blood cell units (OR, 1.212; 95% CI, 1.045-1.405; p = 0.011). Survival was associated with perioperative management according to an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol (OR, 0.370; 95% CI, 0.160-0.854; p = 0.006) and supramesocolic surgery (OR, 0.371; 95% CI, 0.158-0.871; p = 0.023). The study identified several factors associated with an encouraging 1-year mortality rate in this setting. These results highlight the need for identification of suitable targets to optimize pre-, intra-, and postoperative management in order to improve outcomes for this vulnerable population.

Effects of Adding Intrathecal Epinephrine to Spinal Anesthesia on Anesthesia-Related Cesarean Delivery Outcomes: Should We Reconsider Its Use?

Intrathecal epinephrine is used to increase the duration of spinal anesthesia for amenable surgical procedures anticipated to require additional time; however, in the ambulatory setting, it is associated with a prolonged time to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. The current study's authors hypothesized that adding intrathecal epinephrine to spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery would be associated with a dose-dependent prolonged post-anesthesia unit length of stay. A single-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing repeat cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia from 2011 to 2015 was conducted. Patients received spinal bupivacaine 12 mg, morphine 150 mcg, and fentanyl 15 mcg with no-epinephrine, 100 mcg, or 200 mcg of epinephrine. The primary outcome was recovery room length of stay. Secondary outcomes were surgical duration, intraoperative vasopressor use, perioperative opioids, and antiemetic use. Data were analyzed for 1,362 patients. Median recovery room stay was 123 min (interquartile range, 100 to 150) and was not different among groups. More women receiving epinephrine 200 mcg had ≥2 prior cesarean deliveries compared with no-epinephrine or 100 mcg. No significant differences in surgical duration or intraoperative opioids were identified among the groups. Median intraoperative vasopressor use was increased by 225 mcg of phenylephrine equivalents (99% CI, 25 mcg to 430 mcg) in the 100 mcg group and 250 mcg of phenylephrine equivalents in the 200 mcg group (99% CI, 75 mcg to 500 mcg) compared to no-epinephrine (P<0.001). Recovery room antiemetic and opioid analgesic administration were not different among groups. Based on the results of this study, the addition of intrathecal epinephrine for women undergoing cesarean delivery increases intraoperative vasopressor use but does not prolong PACU length of stay, reduce intraoperative opioids, or increase antiemetic requirements postoperatively. The current study also demonstrated that surgical duration times were not different among the no-epinephrine, 100 mcg, and 200 mcg epinephrine groups.

Relationship Between Perioperative Factors and Splenic Artery Steal Syndrome After Orthotopic Liver Transplant: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

After orthotopic liver transplant, ischemia of biliary tract and graft loss may occur due to impaired hepatic arterial blood flow. This situation with hypersplenism and impaired hepatic arterial blood flowis defined as splenic artery steal syndrome.The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between perioperative factors and splenic artery steal syndrome in orthotopic liver transplant patients. Forty-five patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplant between 2014 and 2022 were included in the study. The data for the patients were obtained from the hospital database, including the intraoperative anesthesiology and postoperative intensive care records. Eleven patients were diagnosed with splenic artery steal syndrome. Patients with splenic artery steal syndrome had higher need for intraoperative vasopressor agents (P = .016) and exhibited lower intraoperative urine output (P = .031). In the postoperative intensive care follow-up, patients with splenic artery steal syndrome had higher levels of C-reactive protein during the first 48 hours (P = .030). Intraoperative administration of vasopressor drugs, low urine output, and early postoperative high C-reactive protein levels were associated with the development of splenic artery steal syndrome in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant. Future studies should focus on investigation of biomarkers associated systemic hypoperfusion that may contribute to the development of splenic artery steal syndrome.

Randomized controlled trial of liberal vs. standard fasting instructions in percutaneous cardiac procedures

BackgroundPre-procedural fasting to reduce aspiration risk is usual care prior to surgery requiring anesthesia. Prolonged fasting, however, can result in dehydration and may adversely affect patient experience and outcomes. Previous studies suggest that providing a supplemental beverage to patients undergoing cardiac and a variety of other surgical procedures improves patients’ subjective assessment of thirst and hunger and potentially decreases the need for inotrope and vasopressor therapy. Less is known, however, about the effects of ad libitum clear liquids up to 2 h prior to surgery.MethodsAdult patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or arrhythmia ablation were randomized (1:1) to ad libitum clear liquids up to 2 h prior to their procedure vs. nil per os (NPO) after midnight (control group, usual care). The primary endpoint was a composite satisfaction score that included patient-reported thirst, hunger, headache, nausea, lightheadedness, and anxiousness prior to surgery. The incidence of case-delay was recorded. Intraoperative vasopressor administration, changes in creatinine, anti-emetic use, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were recorded. Safety endpoints including aspiration were assessed.ResultsA total of 200 patients were randomized and 181 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, 92% of patients were ASA class III or IV and 23% of patients had NYHA class III or IV symptoms. Groups were well balanced with no significant differences in age, sex or baseline cardiac or renal disease. The composite satisfaction score (primary endpoint) was not significantly different between groups (Ad libitum median = 12, IQR = [6, 17], vs Standard NPO median = 10, IQR = [5, 15], [95% CI = [-1, 4]). No significant differences between the two groups were observed in any of the individual survey questions (thirst, hunger, headache, nausea, lightheadedness, anxiousness). No significant differences between groups were observed for intra-operative vasopressor use, changes in creatinine, rescue anti-emetic use or hospital LOS. There were no case delays attributed to the intervention. There were no cases of suspected aspiration.ConclusionNo adverse events or case delays were observed in the ad libitum clears group. No significant benefit, however, was observed in patient satisfaction or any of the pre-specified secondary endpoints in patients randomized to ad libitum clear liquids up to 2 h prior to their procedure.Trial registrationNCT04079543.

Epidemiology of surgery associated acute kidney injury (EPIS-AKI): a prospective international observational multi-center clinical study

PurposeThe incidence, patient features, risk factors and outcomes of surgery-associated postoperative acute kidney injury (PO-AKI) across different countries and health care systems is unclear.MethodsWe conducted an international prospective, observational, multi-center study in 30 countries in patients undergoing major surgery (> 2-h duration and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit admission). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of PO-AKI within 72 h of surgery defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Secondary endpoints included PO-AKI severity and duration, use of renal replacement therapy (RRT), mortality, and ICU and hospital length of stay.ResultsWe studied 10,568 patients and 1945 (18.4%) developed PO-AKI (1236 (63.5%) KDIGO stage 1500 (25.7%) KDIGO stage 2209 (10.7%) KDIGO stage 3). In 33.8% PO-AKI was persistent, and 170/1945 (8.7%) of patients with PO-AKI received RRT in the ICU. Patients with PO-AKI had greater ICU (6.3% vs. 0.7%) and hospital (8.6% vs. 1.4%) mortality, and longer ICU (median 2 (Q1-Q3, 1–3) days vs. 3 (Q1-Q3, 1–6) days) and hospital length of stay (median 14 (Q1-Q3, 9–24) days vs. 10 (Q1-Q3, 7–17) days). Risk factors for PO-AKI included older age, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease), type, duration and urgency of surgery as well as intraoperative vasopressors, and aminoglycosides administration.ConclusionIn a comprehensive multinational study, approximately one in five patients develop PO-AKI after major surgery. Increasing severity of PO-AKI is associated with a progressive increase in adverse outcomes. Our findings indicate that PO-AKI represents a significant burden for health care worldwide.

Fluid management and vasopressor use during colorectal surgery: the search for the optimal balance

BackgroundAlthough it is known that excessive intraoperative fluid and vasopressor agents are detrimental for anastomotic healing, optimal anesthesiology protocols for colorectal surgery are currently lacking.ObjectiveTo scrutinize the current hemodynamic practice and vasopressor use and their relation to colorectal anastomotic leakage.DesignA secondary analysis of a previously published prospective observational study: the LekCheck study.Study settingAdult patients undergoing a colorectal resection with the creation of a primary anastomosis.Outcome measuresColorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) within 30 days postoperatively, hospital length of stay and 30-day mortality.ResultsOf the 1548 patients, 579 (37%) received vasopressor agents during surgery. Of these, 201 were treated with solely noradrenaline, 349 were treated with phenylephrine, and 29 received ephedrine. CAL rate significantly differed between the patients receiving vasopressor agents during surgery compared to patients without (11.8% vs 6.3%, p < 0.001). CAL was significantly higher in the group receiving phenylephrine compared to noradrenaline (14.3% vs 6%, p < 0.001). Vasopressor agents were used more often in patients treated with Goal Directed Therapy (47% vs 34.6%, p < 0.001). There was a higher mortality rate in patients with vasopressors compared to the group without (2.8% vs 0.4%, p = 0.01, OR 3.8). Mortality was higher in the noradrenaline group compared to the phenylephrine and those without vasopressors (5% vs. 0.4% and 1.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, patients with intraoperative vasopressor agents had an increased risk to develop CAL (OR 2.1, CI 1.3–3.2, p = 0.001).ConclusionThe present study contributes to the evidence that intraoperative use of vasopressor agents is associated with a higher rate of CAL. This study helps to create awareness on the (necessity to) use of vasopressor agents in colorectal surgery patients in striving for successful anastomotic wound healing. Future research will be required to balance vasopressor agent dosage in view of colorectal anastomotic leakage.

Intraoperative vasopressor use does not increase complications in microvascular post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: Experience in 1729 DIEP flaps at a single center

Vasopressors are traditionally avoided in microsurgery due to concerns about their effect on free flap survival. We examine the impact of intraoperative vasopressors on microsurgical outcomes in a large series of DIEP flap breast reconstructions. A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent DIEP breast reconstruction between January 2010 and May 2020. Intraoperative and postoperative microsurgical outcomes were compared in patients who received vasopressors and those who did not. The study included 1102 women who underwent 1729 DIEP. 878 patients (79.7%) received intraoperative phenylephrine, ephedrine, or a combination of both. There was no significant difference in overall complications, intraoperative microvascular events, takebacks for microvascular complications, or partial or total flap loss between groups. Outcomes were not affected by vasopressor type, dose, or timing of administration. The vasopressor group received significantly lower intraoperative fluid volumes. Multivariate logistic regression found a significant association between overall complications and excessive fluids (OR 2.03, 99% CI 0.98-5.18, p=0.03) but not vasopressor use (OR 0.79, 99% CI 0.64-3.16, p=0.7) CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that vasopressors do not adversely affect clinical outcomes after DIEP breast reconstruction. Withholding vasopressors results in excessive intravenous fluid administration and increased postoperative complications.