Intraoperative Positive Margin Research Articles

Margin Assessment Methods in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Recurrence

Positive margins and margin clearance are risk factors for recurrence in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), and these features are used to guide decisions regarding adjuvant radiation treatment. However, the prognostic value of intraoperative tumor bed vs resection specimen sampling is not well defined. To determine the prognostic implications of intraoperative margin assessment methods (tumor bed vs resection specimen sampling) with recurrence among patients who undergo surgical resection for OCSCC. This was a retrospective study of patients who had undergone surgical resection of OCSCC between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021, at a tertiary-level academic institution. Patients were grouped by margin assessment method (tumor bed [defect] or resection specimen sampling). Of 223 patients with OCSCC, 109 patients had localized tumors (pT1-T2, cN0), 154 had advanced tumors, and 40 were included in both cohorts. Disease recurrence after surgery was estimated by the cumulative incidence method and compared between cohorts using hazard ratios (HRs). Data analyses were performed from January 5, 2023, to April 30, 2023. Recurrence-free survival (RFS). The study population comprised 223 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.7 [12.0] years; 88 (39.5%) female and 200 [90.0%] White individuals) of whom 158 (70.9%) had defect-driven and 65 (29.1%) had specimen-driven margin sampling. Among the 109 patients with localized cancer, intraoperative positive margins were found in 5 of 67 (7.5%) vs 8 of 42 (19.0%) for defect- vs specimen-driven sampling, respectively. Final positive margins were 3.0% for defect- (2 of 67) and 2.4% for specimen-driven (1 of 42) margin assessment. Among the 154 patients with advanced cancer, intraoperative positive margins were found in 29 of 114 (25.4%) vs 13 of 40 (32.5%) for defect- and specimen-driven margins, respectively. Final positive margins were higher in the defect-driven group (9 of 114 [7.9%] vs 1 of 40 [2.5%]). When stratified by margin assessment method, the 3-year rates of local recurrence (9.7% vs 5.1%; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.51-3.66), regional recurrence (11.0% vs 10.4%; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.37-1.94), and distant recurrence (6.4% vs 5.0%; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.36-3.35) were not different for defect- vs specimen-driven sampling cohorts, respectively. The 3-year rate of any recurrence was 18.9% in the defect- and 15.2% in the specimen-driven cohort (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.48-1.81). There were no differences in cumulative incidence of disease recurrence when comparing defect- vs specimen-driven cases. The findings of this retrospective cohort study indicate that margin assessment methods using either defect- or specimen-driven sampling did not demonstrate a clear association with the risk of recurrence after OCSCC resection. Specimen-driven sampling may be associated with reduced surgical margin positivity rates, which often necessitate concurrent chemotherapy with adjuvant radiation therapy.

Lateral thoracic adipofascial flaps in the reconstruction of defects after breast-conserving surgery in breasts with ptosis, mild ptosis or without ptosis

ObjectiveTo study the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of lateral thoracic adipofascial flaps in reconstructing the defects following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in breasts with either no ptosis or mild ptosis. Methods37 female patients who underwent BCS and lateral thoracic adipofascial flap breast reconstruction between June 2020 and July 2022 were analysed. Surgery-related complications, intraoperative positive margin, local recurrence, and cosmetic outcome were assessed. ResultsThree local complications occurred in patients, all of which were cured by conservative treatment. Additionally, four patients had intraoperative positive margins. After a median follow-up period of 17.5 months, none of the patients showed local recurrence. All patients achieved a satisfactory breast shape. Further, patients without ptosis achieved good volume and symmetry. However, the breast symmetry was not satisfactory for patients with ptosis. ConclusionIt is reliable and effective to use the lateral thoracic adipofascial flaps to reconstruct the defects after BCS when the breast is not ptotic and the lesions are located in the lateral and central quadrants.

Analysis of Esophagectomy Margin Practice and Survival Implications

The objective of this study was to determine how thoracic surgeons manage intraoperative esophagectomy positive margins and how these decisions may relate to overall survival and progression-free survival in esophageal cancer. A survey was sent to thoracic surgeons to understand the management of intraoperative positive esophagectomy margins. Primary data at two high-volume esophageal cancer institutions from 1994 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who had intraoperative positive frozen section margins during esophagectomy. Patient characteristics and survival data were collected and analyzed. Overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed using a Cox model. Eighty-five percent of thoracic surgeons responding to a survey reported the utilization of frozen pathologic evaluation during esophagectomy with attempts at re-resection to achieve negative margin. Our esophagectomy database identified 94 patients with intraoperative positive margins. Of those re-resected (n= 67, 63%), 44 patients (46.8%) were converted to R0 resections. overall survival was improved for patients in the R0 group (13 months) vs R+ group (3.4 months, P= .04). Progression-free survival was also improved between the R0 group (8.6 months) and the R+ group (2.2 months, P= .03). In a multivariable analysis for progression-free survival, margin status was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio 3.13, P= .03). From a thoracic surgery survey, 85% of surgeons use intraoperative frozen section margin analysis to guide surgical decision making during an esophagectomy. Analyzing patients with a positive margin discovered during esophagectomy suggests that esophageal cancer patients who can undergo re-resection to a negative margin have increased progression-free survival. The final margin appears to be related to progression-free survival.

Utility of Intraoperative Frozen Section During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Single Institution Experience

Intraoperative frozen section (FS) analysis has been regarded as a paramount tool for immediate evaluation of tumor margin status during partial nephrectomy procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of FS during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). A retrospective review of our Institutional Review Board-approved prospectively maintained minimally invasive partial nephrectomy database yielded 342 consecutive RAPN procedures from June 2007 to September 2011. Of these, the initial 128 cases underwent FS evaluation, whereas the following 214 cases did not. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and final pathology results were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Body mass index, Charleson Comorbidity Index, tumor size, renal score, preoperative creatinine level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were similar between both groups. Operative time was significantly longer in the no-FS group (193 vs 180 min; P=0.04). Warm ischemia time (median 19 vs 19 min), estimated blood loss (150 vs 200 mL), postoperative creatinine level (1.0 vs 1.1 mg/dL), and postoperative eGFR (75.6 vs 75.9) were similar between the no-FS group and FS group, respectively. Complications occurred in 32 (15.0%) and 31 (24.2%) cases in no-FS and FS, respectively (P=0.06). Final pathology results demonstrated seven cases of positive margins, 1 (1%), in the FS group and 6 (3%) in the no-FS group (P=0.19). Of the cases with positive margins at final pathology analysis, a R.E.N.A.L. score of 3/3 was found on closeness to renal sinus. Overall, three intraoperative positive margins were noted in the FS group (2.3%): One patient underwent radical nephrectomy and one reresection; one case was managed with observation only. Routine application of FS analysis during RAPN seems to provide a limited benefit. FS might be advisable for tumors with sinus invasion because they seem to carry a higher likelihood of positive surgical margin at final pathology determination.

Prognostic effect of postoperative resection-margin status for intraoperative positive resection margins in patients with advanced gastric cancer

To investigate prognostic effect of postoperative resection-margin status for intraoperatively positive resection margin in advanced gastric cancer and discuss the treatment choice for intraoperatively positive resection margins. A retrospective study was investigated in 64 advanced gastric cancer patients with positive resection margin after potentially curative resection. The survival between 50 patients who was re-excised to a negative resection margin (NR group) and 14 patients who were left with positive resection margin (PR group) was compared. Prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression model analysis. The median survival in the PR group was 17.0 months (95%CI: 11.6 - 22.4) as compared with 23.0 months (95%CI: 20.5 - 25.5) in the NR group (P = 0.045). However, resection-margin status lost significance on multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of D2 lymphadenectomy, the median survival in the PR group and NR group were 17.0 months (95%CI: 12.0 - 22.0) and 24.0 months (95%CI: 19.8 - 28.1) respectively; multivariate analysis further identified resection margin status as an independent prognostic factor. Re-excision for intraoperatively positive margin to negative margin improves the prognosis of the patients with advanced gastric cancer, and re-excision is the first choice when intraoperative frozen section detects a positive margin. Routine frozen section of resection margin should be mandatory in all advanced gastric cancer undergoing potentially curative surgery.