Intramedullary Headless Compression Screw Research Articles

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Distal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis.

A retrospective review of clean, elective DIP arthrodesis was conducted between September 2018 and September 2021. The subjects were aged 18 years and older and underwent elective DIP arthrodesis for the treatment of osteoarthritis or deformity of the DIP joint. All the procedures were performed using an intramedullary headless compression screw. The rates of postoperative infections and treatments required for infections were recorded and analyzed. Overall, 37 unique patients had at least one case of DIP arthrodesis that met the criteria for inclusion in our analysis. Twenty of the 37 patients did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis, and 17 of the 37 patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. Five of the 20 patients who did not receive antibiotics prophylactically developed infections, and none of the 17 patients who received antibiotics prophylactically developed an infection. Fisher exact test revealed a significant difference in the infection rates between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in infections with respect to smoking or diabetes status. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered for clean, elective DIP arthrodesis, using an intramedullary screw.

Anterograde Intramedullary Headless Compression Screw for Managing Extra-articular Thumb Metacarpal Base Fracture: Technique and Report.

Extra-articular base fractures of the thumb are typical in hand surgeon practice. Nonoperative methods (spica) and operative methods are available for its management. There are operative methods described, such as plate and screws, Kirschner wires, and intramedullary screws. However, there is only a retrograde technique described. This study aims to present a new technique of an anterograde intramedullary headless compression screw to manage the extra-articular thumb metacarpal base fracture. This minimally invasive method allows an early range of motion and does not cross the articular surface of the thumb. This alternative fixation method has the advantage of low damage to soft tissues and good functional outcomes.

What's New in Hand and Wrist Surgery.

What's New in Hand and Wrist Surgery.

Outcomes of mini-open retrograde intramedullary headless screw fixation of metacarpal fractures

Abstract Background Metacarpal fractures accounting around one-third of hand fractures, which account for ten percent of all fractures and happen predominantly between the ages of 30 and 40. This research objected to examine the radiological, functional, and complication-reduction effects of closed reduction and internal fixation utilizing headless compression screws in metacarpal fractures cases. Patients and methods This prospective one-arm research involved 24 subjects with a total of 25 unstable metacarpal neck and shaft fractures surgically treated at Menoufia university hospital and Sheikh-Zayed Specialized, Egypt. They were controlled with intramedullary headless compression screws (IMHS). Results Complications were reported in 5 (20.8%) patients, Union of fracture was reported in 23 (95.8%) patients. The mean TAM score was 250.63 ± 19.58 ranging between 180 and 260 with a median of 260. The mean dash score was 1.75 ± 2.91 ranging between 0 and 11.36 with a median of 0.00. Conclusion The metacarpal fractures IMHS fixation is an effective, safe, and complication-free treatment and looked to need less imposing and restore function more quickly.

Fixation of Hand Fractures with Intramedullary Headless Compression Screws.

Metacarpal and phalangeal fractures remain among the most frequently encountered orthopedic injuries, accounting for 10% of all fractures. For operative fractures, there is an array of treatment options with percutaneous kirschner wire stabilization and screw and plate fixation strategies predominating. Recently, a new fixation method was introduced, intramedullary (IM) fixation with headless screws, which has advantages of a percutaneous technique and buried hardware. The purpose of this review is to highlight the indications and surgical techniques of IM screw fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. Although more research is needed, IM fixation represents a potentially reliable alternative to Kirschner-wire and plate fixation.

Intra-medullary Cannulated Headless Compression Screw for Bone Graft Fixation in Metacarpal Fractures.

High energy metacarpal fracture presenting with critical bone loss requires bone graft and hardware stabilisation. Early bone grafting and rigid internal fixation allow expedited patient recovery. Plate fixation is the most described technique when an autologous bone graft is being used. In this report, we present an alternative technique to secure bone grafts to metacarpal shafts with intra-medullary headless compression screws (HCS). In the presented patient, significant bone defects of the fourth and fifth metacarpals were bridged using iliac crest cortico-cancellous bone grafts and fixed with HCS. This method of fixation allowed controlled early active mobilisation. Bone graft incorporation and excellent active range of motion were demonstrated. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

A Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Techniques in Metacarpal Shaft Fractures.

Background Typically, metacarpal shaft fractures are treated with closed reduction percutaneous pinning, intramedullary nails, or plate fixation. Recently some surgeons have begun using intramedullary headless compression screws. Questions/Purposes The purpose of this study was to compare intramedullary screw fixation to K-wire fixation, which is the standard of care in a transverse metacarpal midshaft fracture, using a cadaveric model. Our hypothesis was that intramedullary screw fixation would have a biomechanical advantage (higher stiffness and peak load to failure) when compared with dual Kirschner wire fixation of transverse metacarpal shaft fractures. Methods Four-point bend testing was performed to compare stiffness and failure load values of seven paired 2nd and 3rd metacarpals instrumented with headless intramedullary compression screw fixation or Kirschner wire fixation. Similar testing was performed on 14 unpaired 4th metacarpals. Results There was no significant difference in peak load ( p = 0.60) or stiffness ( p = 0.85) between fixation groups for the 2nd and 3rd instrumented metacarpals. For the instrumented 4th metacarpals, there was no significant difference in peak load ( p = 0.14), but the stiffness was significantly greater ( p = 0.01) for the compression screw group compared with the Kirschner wire fixation. Conclusions/Clinical Relevance In this study, the load to failure was not different between the two fixation methods and likely both techniques can sustain physiologic loads needed for rehabilitation. The greater stiffness in the 4th metacarpal compression screw group may be related to the smaller canal morphology than in the 2nd and 3rd metacarpals. Larger diameter screws may be needed to obtain a better fit particularly in the 2nd and 3rd metacarpals.

Intramedullary headless compression screw fixation for midshaft fractures of the clavicle: A case report study

Historically, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures have been managed conservatively. However, recent literature has supported operative management of displaced and shortened clavicle fractures. Several options exist for surgical fixation, including plating and intramedullary (IM) fixation. IM fixation has the potential advantages of a smaller incision and decreased dissection and soft-tissue exposure and less prominent hardware.Rockwood and Hagie pins represented the most popular form of IM fixation during the last two decades,but concerns exist regarding stability and complications. The use of alternative IM implants, such as Kirschner wires, titanium elastic nails, and cannulated screws, also has been described in limited case series. However, concerns persist regarding the complications associated with the use of these implants, including implant failure, migration, skin complications, prominent screw head and construct stability. Our technique describes intramedullary fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures using a single headless compression screw (HCS) 4.5–6.5-mm. which is simple, affordable, and allows intramedullary compression, stability, load sharing, little periosteal stripping, very limited skin incision and rapid recovery after surgery.

Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary screw fixation, dorsal plating and K-wire fixation for stable metacarpal shaft fractures.

We compared four methods of metacarpal shaft fixation: 2.2 mm intramedullary headless compression screw; 3.0 mm intramedullary headless compression screw; intramedullary K-wire fixation; and dorsal plate fixation. Transverse mid-diaphyseal fractures were created in 64 metacarpal sawbones and were assigned into four groups. Peak load to failure and stiffness were measured in cantilever bending and torsion. We found that dorsal plating had the highest peak load to failure. However, initial bending stiffness of the 3.0 mm intramedullary headless compression screw was higher than that of the dorsal plates. In torsion testing, dorsal plating had the highest peak torque, but there was no significant difference in torsional stiffness between the plate and intramedullary headless compression screw constructs. We concluded that intramedullary headless compression screw fixation is biomechanically superior to K-wires in cantilever bending and torsion; however, it is less stable than dorsal plating. In our study, the initial stability provided by K-wire fixation was sufficient to cope with expected loads in the early rehabilitation period, whereas dorsal plates and IHCS constructs provided stability far in excess of what is required.

Metacarpal shaft fixation: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plating, lag screws, and headless compression screws

BackgroundMetacarpal shaft fractures are common and can be treated nonoperatively. Shortening, angulation, and rotational deformity are indications for surgical treatment. Various forms of treatment with advantages and disadvantages have been documented. The purpose of the study was to determine the stability of fracture fixation with intramedullary headless compression screws in two types of metacarpal shaft fractures and compare them to other common forms of rigid fixation: dorsal plating and lag screw fixation. It was hypothesized that headless compression screws would demonstrate a biomechanical stronger construct.MethodsFive matched paired hands (age 60.9 ± 4.6 years), utilizing non-thumb metacarpals, were used for comparative fixation in two fracture types created by an osteotomy. In transverse diaphyseal fractures, fixation by headless compression screws (n = 7) and plating (n = 8) were compared. In long oblique diaphyseal fractures, headless compression screws (n = 8) were compared with plating (n = 8) and lag screws (n = 7). Testing was performed using an MTS frame producing an apex dorsal, three point bending force. Peak load to failure and stiffness were calculated from the load-displacement curve generated.ResultsFor transverse fractures, headless compression screws had a significantly higher stiffness and peak load to failure, means 249.4 N/mm and 584.8 N, than plates, means 129.02 N/mm and 303.9 N (both p < 0.001). For long oblique fractures, stiffness and peak load to failure for headless compression screws were means 209 N/mm and 758.4 N, for plates 258.7 N/mm and 518.5 N, and for lag screws 172.18 N/mm and 234.11 N. There was significance in peak load to failure for headless compression screws vs plates (p = 0.023), headless compression screws vs lag screws (p < 0.001), and plates vs lag screws (p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in stiffness between groups.ConclusionIntramedullary fixation of diaphyseal metacarpal fractures with a headless compression screw provides excellent biomechanical stability. Coupled with lower risks for adverse effects, headless compression screws may be a preferable option for those requiring rapid return to sport or work.Level of evidenceBasic Science Study, Biomechanics.

Minimally Invasive Intramedullary Screw Versus Plate Fixation for Proximal Phalanx Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

To compare the maximum interfragmentary displacement of short oblique proximal phalanx (P1) fractures fixed with an intramedullary headless compression screw (IMHCS) versus a plate-and-screws construct in a cadaveric model that generates finger motion via the flexor and extensor tendons of the fingers. We created a 30° oblique cut in 24 P1s of the index, middle, ring, and little fingers for 3 matched pairs of cadaveric hands. Twelve fractures were stabilized with an IMHCS using an antegrade, dorsal articular margin technique at the P1 base. The 12 matched-pair P1 fractures were stabilized with a radially placed 2.0-mm plate with 2 bicortical nonlocking screws on each side of the fracture. Hands were mounted to a frame allowing a computer-controlled, motor-driven, linear actuator powered movement of fingers via the flexor and extensor tendons. All fingers underwent 2,000 full-flexion and extension cycles. Maximum interfragmentary displacement was continuously measured using a differential variable reluctance transducer. The observed mean displacement differences between IMHCS and plate-and-screws fixation was not statistically significant throughout all time points during the 2,000 cycles. A 2 one-sided test procedure for paired samples confirmed statistical equivalence in fracture displacement between fixation methods at the final 2,000-cycle time point. The IMHCS provided biomechanical stability equivalent to plate-and-screws for short oblique P1 fractures at the 2,000-cycle mark in this cadaveric model. Short oblique P1 fracture fixation with an IMHCS may provide adequate stability to withstand immediate postoperative active range of motion therapy.

Evaluation of Antegrade Intramedullary Compression Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures in a Cadaver Model

Surgical options for displaced metacarpal shaft fractures include the use of Kirschner wires, plates and screws, and most recently, intramedullary headless compression screws (IMHCS), which have been reported using only retrograde insertion through the metacarpal head. We evaluated IMHCS fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures through an antegrade approach in a cadaver model. We performed antegrade placement of IMHCS in 10 cadaver hands including all 5 digits (total of 50). Displaced transverse proximal metacarpal shaft fractures were created and reduced with a retrograde guidewire from the metacarpal head across the shaft fracture andexiting the metacarpal base. This was retrieved through a 6-mm dorsal wrist incision and overdrilled before the placement of a 4.1-mm-diameter IMHCS in the ring finger and a 4.7-mm screw in all other metacarpals. After IMHCS placement, carpometacarpal (CMC) joint violation was measured along with the optimal starting point for the guidewire on the metacarpal head relative to the dorsal cortex. In all 50 metacarpals, we achieved successful fracture reduction and fixation without violating the extensor mechanism at the wrist. Our retrograde guidewire entry point through the metacarpal head ranged from 4.2 to 4.7 mm volar to the dorsal cortex. The actual area of CMC joint violated by IMHCS placement was largest in the index CMC joint (4.9%), followed by the middle (3.7%), little (2.9%), ring (0.5%), and thumb joints (0.2%). Placement of IMHCS through an antegrade approach from the CMC joint can be performed effectively for all transverse metacarpal fractures, including the thumb, using a limited incision. There is minimal violation of the articular surfaces of the trapezium, capitate, and hamate for the thumb, middle, ring, and little metacarpals. Antegrade IMHCS fixation successfully avoids the potential morbidity of creating a metacarpal head articular surface or extensor mechanism defect at the metacarpophalangeal joint seen with the retrograde approaches.

Comparison of Bending Strength among Plate, Steinmann Pin, and Headless Compression Screw Fixations for Proximal Ulnar Shaft Fracture in Sawbones

Purpose: Although plate osteosynthesis is commonly used to treat proximal ulna fracture, its treatment method is controversial because of complications such as large incision, long operation time, and soft tissue injury. Therefore, intramedullary headless compression screw (HCS) and Steinmann pin are considered as alternative treatment options. In this study, we aim to compare bending strength of plate and cortical screws, HCS, and Steinmann pin for proximal ulnar shaft fracture with sawbone. Methods: Transverse type fractures were made intentionally at the distal 7 cm from the proximal end of ulna sawbones and fixated with plate, HCS, and Steinmann pin after reduction. Three-point bending tests were performed with total of 21 sawbones, seven pieces for each group. Results: Average ultimate bending strength for each group was as follows; 521.7N for plate fixation group, 706.4N for HCS fixation group, and 812.6N for Steinmann pin fixation group. Statistically significant results were observed among the three groups (p&lt;0.01). When two groups were compared separately, Steinmann pin fixation and plate fixation (p&lt;0.01), Steinmann pin and HCS fixation (p=0.047) showed statistical significance. There was a significant trend between HCS and plate fixation group (p=0.064).Conclusion: HCS and Steinmann pin fixation showed higher bending strength when compared to plate fixation for proximal ulnar shaft fracture in sawbone. Although further studies are needed, HCS and Steinmann pin fixation are promising fixation methods that may be used as an alternative to plate fixation.

An Anatomical Study of Metacarpal Morphology Utilizing CT Scans: Evaluating Parameters for Antegrade Intramedullary Compression Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures

This study evaluated metacarpal morphology for antegrade placement of intramedullary headless compression screws (IMHCS) for metacarpal fracture fixation. We analyzed 100 hand computed tomography scans to quantify cortical thickness, intramedullary diameter, and metacarpal lengths. In addition, dorsal or ulnar overhang of the metacarpals over their respective carpal bones was measured. We also predicted optimal entry points for guidewire placement at the metacarpal head. The ring finger metacarpal had the narrowest medullary canal width (coronal, 2.8 mm; sagittal, 3.5 mm). Not counting the thumb, the little finger metacarpal had the widest midshaft medullary width of 4.1 mm in the coronal plane and the middle metacarpal was widest in the sagittal plane with canal width of 3.9 mm. On average, there was maximal dorsal overhang at the base of the middle metacarpal (4.2 mm) and maximal ulnar overhang at the base of the small metacarpal (3.9 mm). The optimal entry point for guidewire placement over each metacarpal head was approximately 3.5 to 3.8 mm volar to the dorsal cortex. Minimum IMHCS diameters of 3.5 mm for the ring and 4.0 mm for the index, middle and little fingers are necessary to achieve interference fit within the medullary canal. Minimum screw lengths of 38 mm would be needed to ensure 6 mm fixation past the midshaft of the metacarpals. Antegrade IMHCS for fixation of proximal metacarpal fractures may be most feasible with thumb, middle, and little finger metacarpals because there was larger dorsal or ulnar overhang to allow screw placement without violating the carpometacarpal joints. Our analysis provides a reference guide for intramedullary screw sizes for each metacarpal of the hand to achieve interference fit with fracture fixation. Furthermore, the dorsal and ulnar overhangs of the metacarpal bases suggest the practicality of antegrade IMHCS fixation.

Intramedullary compression screw fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.

The intramedullary headless compression screw (IMCS) technique represents a reliable alternative to percutaneous Kirschner-wire and plate fixation with minimal complications.Transverse fractures of the metacarpal shaft represent a good indication for this technique. Non-comminuted subcapital and short oblique fractures can also be treated with IMCS.This technique should not be used in the presence of an open epiphysis, infection and, most of all, in subchondral fractures, because of the lack of purchase for the head of the screw.A double screw construct is recommended for comminuted subcapital fractures of the metacarpal to avoid metacarpal shortening. IMCS can even be applied for peri-articular fractures of the proximal third of the phalanx and in some multi-fragmentary proximal and middle phalangeal fractures.Usually the intramedullary screws are not removed. The main indications for screw removal are joint protrusion, infection and screw breakage after new fracture.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:624-629. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190068

Morphological Analysis of Metacarpal Shafts With Respect to Retrograde Intramedullary Headless Screw Fixation.

Background: The use of retrograde intramedullary headless compression screw fixation for metacarpal neck and shaft fractures has been described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to perform a computed tomography (CT)-based morphological analysis of metacarpal size to help surgeons anticipate expected hardware needs. Methods: In all, 108 consecutive hand CT scans were evaluated for the medullary diameter in the volar-dorsal and radial-ulnar planes at the narrowest point of the canal, as well as for the distance from the articular surface to this point. Results were then analyzed by finger and by sex. Results: The ring finger had the smallest average medullary canal diameter for both men and women (2.7 and 2.6 mm, respectively); the small finger had the largest average diameter (3.9 mm) for men and the middle finger (3.6 mm) for women. Radial-ulnar was the rate-limiting dimension in the index, middle, and ring fingers, whereas volar-dorsal was the smallest dimension in the small finger, regardless of sex. Medullary diameter tended to be larger in patients aged more than 50 years. More than 50% of fingers have diameters >3.0 mm, and at least 40% of index, middle, and small fingers have diameters >3.5 mm, which are common diameters of commercially available headless compression screws. Conclusions: When preparing to perform open reduction internal fixation of a metacarpal using retrograde intramedullary headless compression screws, the surgeon needs to be prepared with screws of larger diameters to optimize fixation. Screws of larger diameters are needed to achieve endosteal purchase, regardless of sex.

Osteosynthesis of Phalangeal Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Kirschner Wires, Plates, and Compression Screws

The aim of this study was to compare several osteosynthesis techniques (intramedullary headless compression screws, T-plates, and Kirschner wires) for distal epiphyseal fractures of proximal phalanges in a human cadaveric model. A total of 90 proximal phalanges from 30 specimens (index, ring, and middle fingers) were used for this study. After stripping off all soft tissue, a transverse distal epiphyseal fracture was simulated at the proximal phalanx. The 30 specimens were randomly assigned to 1 fixation technique (30 per technique), either a 3.0-mm intramedullary headless compression screw, locking plate fixation with a 2.0-mm T-plate, or 2 oblique 1.0-mm Kirschner wires. Displacement analysis (bending, distraction, and torsion) was performed using optical tracking of an applied random speckle pattern after osteosynthesis. Biomechanical testing was performed with increasing cyclic loading and with cyclic load to failure using a biaxial torsion-tension testing machine. Cannulated intramedullary compression screws showed significantly less displacement at the fracture site in torsional testing. Furthermore, screws were significantly more stable in bending testing. Kirschner wires were significantly less stable than plating or screw fixation in any cyclic load to failure test setup. Intramedullary compression screws are a highly stable alternative in the treatment of transverse distal epiphyseal phalangeal fractures. Kirschner wires seem to be inferior regarding displacement properties and primary stability. Fracture fixation of phalangeal fractures using plate osteosynthesis may have the advantage of a very rigid reduction, but disadvantages such as stiffness owing to the more invasive surgical approach and soft tissue irritation should be taken into account. Headless compression screws represent a minimally invasive choice for fixation with good biomechanical properties.

Antegrade Intramedullary Screw Fixation: A Novel Approach to Metacarpal Fractures

Metacarpal fractures are common upper-extremity fractures. Surgical fixation is recommended for open injuries, segmental bone loss, multiple metacarpal fractures, irreducible fractures, and unstable fracture patterns. For transverse and short oblique metacarpal shaft fracture patterns, intramedullary headless compression screws have been added most recently as a surgical option. Intramedullary headless compression screw fixation has been performed in a retrograde manner in which a guidewire and then a cannulated headless screw are placed through a skin excision, a split in the sagittal band or extensor tendon, and the dorsal central articular cartilage surface of the metacarpal head. Here, we describe a step-by-step novel approach to fixation of transverse and short oblique proximal and midshaft metacarpal fractures through an antegrade approach using intramedullary headless compression screws with a detailed 4K high-definition video demonstration and 2 clinical cases involving the middle and ring metacarpals. This surgical alternative addresses many concerns with the retrograde technique and avoids creating defects in the extensor tendon, the sagittal hood, the articular surface of the metacarpal head at the metacarpophalangeal joint, and the articulating surface of the trapezium, capitate, and hamate at the carpometacarpal articulation.

Low Rate of Complications Following Intramedullary Headless Compression Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures.

Background: There has been a recent increase in the use of headless compression screws for fixation of metacarpal neck and shaft fractures as they offer several advantages, and minimal complications have been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical complications and their solutions following retrograde intramedullary headless compression screw fixation of metacarpal fractures. We describe complications and the approach to their management. Methods: We performed a multicenter case series through retrospective review of all patients treated with intramedullary headless screw fixation of metacarpal fractures by 3 fellowship-trained hand surgeons. Patient demographics, implant used, type of complication, pre- and postoperative radiographs, operative reports, and sequelae were reviewed for each case. We defined complications as infection, loss of fixation, hardware failure, malrotation, nonunion, malunion, metal allergy, and any repeat surgical intervention. Results: Four complications (2.5%) were identified through the review of 160 total metacarpal fractures. One complication was a nickel allergy, one was a broken screw after repeat trauma, and 2 patients had bent intramedullary screws. Screw removal in 3 patients was simple and without complications or persistent limitations. One bent screw with a refracture was left in place. No serious complications were seen. Conclusion: Intramedullary screw fixation of metacarpal fractures is safe with a low incidence of complications (2.5%) that can be safely and effectively managed.

Intramedullary headless screw fixation for fractures of the proximal and middle phalanges in the digits of the hand: a review of 31 consecutive fractures.

We present the results of 26 patients with 31 consecutive displaced or unstable extra-articular fractures of the base and shaft of the proximal and middle phalanges of the digits of the hand, treated over a period of 12 months with an intramedullary headless compression screw and early mobilization with no splinting. All fractures healed with no major complications. Only one patient, who had a pathological fracture through an enchondroma, required a tenolysis to improve the mobility of the finger. This technique seems to be technically simple, effective and with few drawbacks. IV.