Intralesional Immunotherapy Research Articles

Intralesional immunotherapy of cutaneous warts using tuberculin purified protein derivative and vitamin D3 – A randomized comparative study

Objectives: Numerous studies have been conducted on the clinical efficacy of immunotherapeutic agents in the treatment of cutaneous warts showing variable results. The present study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of intralesional tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) and Vitamin D3 therapy in recurrent and recalcitrant extra-genital cutaneous warts. Material and Methods: This study was conducted as a prospective, randomized, comparative, and single-blind study. A total of 104 patients were randomly distributed into two treatment groups: Group A (Tuberculin PPD, n = 53) and Group B (Vitamin D3, n = 51). Each patient in Group A received an intralesional injection of 0.1 mL tuberculin PPD (5 Tuberculin Units), while each patient in Group B received an intralesional injection of 0.2 mL Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol containing 120,000 IU). The injections were given at the initial visit (week 0) and after every 2 weeks for a maximum of four sessions (weeks 2, 4, and 6). The largest wart was selected for intralesional therapy. The categorization of clinical response was done based on the percent reduction in the size of warts into complete (appearance of normal skin), marked (>50% reduction), moderate (<50% reduction), and inadequate (no change in warts) responses. Adverse effects (if any) were recorded during each patient visit. The final response was evaluated at 6 months follow-up from the last treatment session. Results: Regarding the response of patients to tuberculin PPD therapy, out of a total of 53 patients, 40 (75.5%) showed a complete response. Regarding the response of patients to Vitamin D3 therapy, out of a total of 51 patients, 36 (70.6%) showed a complete response. However, the difference in the response to the treatment between the two groups was statistically insignificant (P = 0.402). Conclusion: Both intralesional tuberculin PPD and Vitamin D3 are effective and safe in the treatment of all recurrent and recalcitrant extra-genital cutaneous warts.

Comparative Analysis of Intralesional Immunotherapy and Conventional Treatments for Non-Genital Warts: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Warts, benign skin growths caused by various human papillomavirus strains, are categorized as genital and non-genital. Non-genital warts often lack noticeable symptoms but can lead to psychological distress due to factors like embarrassment. Traditional treatments, including physical and chemical methods, show limitations, prompting the exploration of novel approaches like intralesional immunotherapy. The clinical challenge lies in selecting the most effective modality. In our study, we used the network meta-analysis (NMA) as a statistical tool to explore the most effective intralesional immunotherapy interventions. Comprehensive searches of Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were conducted until December 2023. Eligible studies were analyzed for outcomes presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Treatments were ranked using the P-score in an NMA performed with R software. We included 68 RCTs in our study. For complete response, needling showed a significant difference compared to Candida albicans antigen (RR= 0.13, 95% CI [0.02; 0.99]) and Mw (RR= 0.12, 95% CI [0.02; 0.94]). In overall response, both bleomycin and furosemide with digoxin were significant compared to autoimplantation (RR= 0.46, 95% CI [0.24; 0.88]) and (RR= 0.40, 95% CI [0.18; 0.91]) respectively. Similarly, both were significant compared to cryotherapy (RR= 0.45, 95% CI [0.27; 0.76]) and (RR= 0.40, 95% CI [0.19; 0.82]) respectively. This NMA indicates needling, furosemide with digoxin, and PBP antigen stimulants as effective for non-genital warts, surpassing traditional treatments in complete and overall response. Direct comparisons in future research are warranted to confirm their superiority.

Intralesional Mumps, Measles, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine as Therapy for Recurrent Condyloma Acuminata: A Case Report

Background: Condyloma acuminata (CA), a prevalent sexually transmitted infection caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV), presents challenges in treatment due to its high recurrence rate. While various treatment modalities exist, intralesional immunotherapy with the mumps, measles, rubella (MMR) vaccine has shown promise in managing HPV-related conditions. This case report investigates intralesional MMR vaccine in treating recurrent CA. Case presentation: A 24-year-old female presented with recurrent CA lesions on the labia majora and perianal region. Despite prior treatment with trichloroacetic acid (TCA), the lesions had reappeared. Intralesional MMR vaccine injections were administered twice, one month apart, resulting in complete lesion resolution within six weeks of the second injection. No recurrence was observed during a six-month follow-up period, and the patient reported only mild, transient pain at the injection sites. Conclusion: This case report highlights the potential of intralesional MMR vaccine as an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for recurrent CA. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and establish optimal treatment protocols.

Topical and Intralesional Immunotherapy for the Management of Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of cancer among the white population. Individuals with fair skin have an average lifetime risk of around 30% for developing BCC, and there is a noticeable upward trend in its incidence rate. The principal treatment objectives for BCC involve achieving the total excision of the tumor while maximizing the preservation of function and cosmesis. Surgery is considered the treatment of choice for BCC for two main reasons: it allows for the highest cure rates and facilitates histological control of resection margins. However, in the subgroup of patients with low-risk recurrence or medical contraindications for surgery, new non-surgical treatment alternatives can provide an excellent oncological and cosmetic outcome. An evident and justified instance of these local therapies occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period when surgical interventions carried out in hospital settings were not a viable option.

Intralesional Quadrivalent Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Versus Candida Antigen in the Treatment of Multiple Recalcitrant Non-Genital Warts.

Warts are the most prevalent clinical manifestation of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infections, which vary in morphological pattern depending on the site of the body affected. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine versus candida antigen in treatment of multiple recalcitrant non-genital warts. A randomized-control clinical trial included 60 cases with multiple recalcitrant warts who were randomly distributed into three groups; Group I included 20 patients who received intralesional candida antigen at a dose of 0.3 mL of 1/1000 solution, Group II included 20 patients who received intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine at a dose of 0.3ml and Group III included 20 patients who received intralesional injection 0.3 ml of normal saline 0.9% as a control group). Each agent was injected at the base of the largest wart every three weeks until it was completely cleared, or for a total of four sessions. the highest response rate was detected in the quadrivalent HPV vaccine group (75% complete response) followed by the candida vaccine group (40% complete response and 15% partial response). Also, regarding the distant response rate, the highest response rate was detected in the quadrivalent HPV vaccine group (72.7% complete response and 27.3% partial response) followed by the candida vaccine group (33.3% complete response and 50% partial response). Intralesional immunotherapy appears to be effective and safe in treating multiple recalcitrant non-genital warts, with intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine outperforming intralesional candida antigen.

Abstract CT004: A single arm phase 2 study of TVEC in patients with invasive cutaneous SCC: A novel therapeutic approach for low risk tumors

Abstract Background: Immune recognition and cytotoxic responses play an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) is an HSV-1 oncolytic immunological agent FDA approved for the local treatment of unresectable recurrent melanoma. It is proposed that T-VEC directly destroys cancer cells, and induces production of GM-CSF to enhance systemic antitumor immune priming. This proposed mechanism of action supports the novel approach to implement TVEC in the management of cSCC, particularly, in patients with increased burden of primary tumors. Methods: Study subjects were Immunocompetent, ≥ 18 years of age, and diagnosed with at least one histologically confirmed primary low-risk cSCC according to the Brigham and Women staging system. Unresectable lesions or patients unable/unwilling to undergo standard of care treatment were eligible to participate. Study lesions included target lesions injected (TLIs) and target non-injected lesions (TNILs). TNILs were selected to evaluate for abscopal effect when feasible. The TLIs were treated according to TVEC FDA approved protocol and followed for 1yr after the 1st injection. The primary study endpoint was to evaluate the overall response rate, defined as the proportion of subjects who achieved complete response and partial response in the TLIs. Safety and adverse effect profile (AEs), duration of response, time to response, durable response rate, and time to progression, were the secondary endpoints. A Simon 2 stage design was used. Total sample size was calculated to be 20 subjects. A total of 11 subjects were recruited, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and 100% CR observed in the interim analysis. NCT 03714828. Results: The analysis was conducted after all 11 participants completed Visit 8 (230-271 days from study initiation). Conclusions: TVEC showed extremely impressive ORR for patients with cSCC with a 95.8% CR for TLIs. AE profile of TVEC was mild and was well tolerated. Further studies evaluating the role of intralesional immunotherapy should be considered in patients with increased burden of cSCC. Table 1. summarizes the study results. For the primary endpoint 100% of participants achieved an overall response. Primary outcomes for patients (n = 11) Secondary outcomes for TLIs (n = 24) Time to response - days Mean ± standard deviation Median/Range (min, max) 41.6 ± 24.9 Time to response - days Mean ± standard deviation Median/Range (min, max) 48.7 ± 29.2 35/(18 - 112) 35/(18 - 112) Final response to TVEC - % Overall response rate (ORR) Partial response (PR) Complete response (CR) 100% (11/11) 9.1% (1/11) Response to TVEC - Overall response rate (ORR) Partial response (PR) Complete response (CR) 100% (24/24) 90.9% (10/11) 4.2% (1/24) 95.8% (23/24) Duration of response - days Mean ± standard deviation Median - Range (min, max) 206.0 ± 26.0 Duration of response - days Mean ± standard deviation Median - Range (min, max) 201.4 ± 29.6 212 (140 - 236) 209 (136 - 250) Durable response rate - % 90.9% (10/11) Durable response rate - % 83.3% (20/24) Secondary outcomes for TNILs (n = 2) Final response to TVEC - % 100% (2/2) Adverse Events NCI CTCAE (v. 4.0) Event n (%) 95% CI Severity Mild (Grade 1) Moderate (Grade 2) Fatigue 5 (45.5%) (16.7%, 76.6%) 4 (80%) 1 (20%) Flu-like symptoms 4 (36.4%) (10.9%, 69.2%) 3 (75%) 1 (25%) Headache 2 (18.2%) (2.3%, 51.7% 2 (100%) Citation Format: Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski, Delaney B. Stratton, Anngela C. Adams, Haiyan Cui, Denise Roe, Srinath Sundararajan. A single arm phase 2 study of TVEC in patients with invasive cutaneous SCC: A novel therapeutic approach for low risk tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT004.

Intralesional antigen immunotherapy of Warts: Review Article

Intralesional antigen immunotherapy of Warts: Review Article

The role of intralesional immunotherapy in Condyloma Acuminata

Intralesional immunotherapy is one of the immunotherapy modalities that can be given to patients with condyloma acuminata (CA) with a high success rate both in inhibiting progression and preventing recurrence of genital warts. Intralesional immunotherapy regimens that are currently being studied are the use of vaccines and cytokines. Some of the antigens studied for use as therapy in genital warts include Candida albicans, measles, mumps and rubella (MMR), and Tuberculin/Purified Protein Derivate (PPD), Mycobacterium w, and Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Vaccines and cytokines work by inducing a delayed-type hypersensitivity response to warts tissue, both through cellular and humoral immune responses, mediated by CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD4+ T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes and regulatory T cells so that this can eliminate HPV virus infection in CA. This literature review aims to provide an understanding of the use of intralesional immunotherapy as an effective alternative therapy in CA.

Intralesional Treatments for Invasive Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most frequent cancer in humans and has the potential to progress locally, metastasize, and cause death in a subset of patients. cSCC is especially common in the elderly, and it will probably represent a major health concern in the near future. Surgery is the standard treatment for cSCC, but intralesional therapies can sometimes be considered for certain patients and under certain circumstances. The choice of intralesional treatment depends on the patient's characteristics and the clinician's previous experience and expertise. Here we are reviewing intralesional treatments for cSCC and keratoacanthoma (KA). We have started with some classic drugs, such as methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, interferon, and cryosurgery, but also comment on electrochemotherapy. Finally, we have focused on novel therapies, some of which are under development, and future perspectives, including intralesional immunotherapy and oncolytic viruses.

Topical and Intralesional Immunotherapy for the Management of Skin Cancer in Special Locations: Lips and Eyelids.

The use of topical and intralesional immunotherapy in the treatment of cutaneous malignant neoplasia in sensitive areas such as the lips and eyelids is discussed. Surgery may not be feasible or may result in deformities in these areas, making alternative treatment options necessary. A narrative literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed) as the main literature database, collecting available evidence of experiences with various topical and intralesional therapies in the aforementioned anatomical locations, ranging from case reports to clinical trials. The clearance rates and potential adverse reactions of therapeutic options such as imiquimod 5%, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), photodynamic therapy (PDT), ingenol mebutate (IM), diclofenac, intralesional methotrexate, and interferon are reviewed. Although limited by their heterogeneity and the scarcity of clinical trials, these studies point towards promising response rates and minimal adverse effects, making these treatments viable options in selected cases.

Intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine after failure of intralesional Candida antigen for the treatment of recalcitrant pediatric warts.

Numerous studies have investigated the efficacy of intralesional immunotherapy for warts, but there are a lack of studies investigating the efficacy of alternative intralesional immunotherapies following failure of initial intralesional immunotherapy. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine for the treatment of pediatric warts following failure of intralesional therapy with Candida antigen. Following intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine administration, 8/51 (15.5%) patients had complete resolution of their warts, 6/51 (12%) had near complete resolution, 19/51 (37%) had partial improvement, 12/51 (23.5%) had no change, and 6/51 (12%) had worsening. Although limited by retrospective nature and low sample size, our results demonstrate that intralesional immunotherapy with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine provides an alternative therapeutic option for the treatment of recalcitrant pediatric warts in patients who fail to respond to intralesional Candida antigen.

Intralesional bivalent and quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccines didn't significantly enhance the response of multiple anogenital warts when co-administered with intralesional Candida antigen immunotherapy. A randomized controlled trial.

Treatment of anogenital warts (AGWs) is challenging. Candida antigen immunotherapy has been proven to be a safe and relatively effective therapeutic modality; nevertheless, some patients may experience a partial or no response. Combining Candida antigen with other immunotherapies has been proposed to improve the cure rate. Immunotherapy with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines has been tried with conflicting outcomes. This study aimedto assess the efficacy and safety of intralesional Candida antigen, either alone or in combination with intralesional bivalent or quadrivalent HPV vaccines, for treating multiple AGWs. Eighty patients with multiple AGWs were included and randomly assigned to four equal groups: group A treated with intralesional Candida antigen only; group B treated with intralesional bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix) and Candida; group C treated with intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil) and Candida; and group D (control) treated with intralesional saline. Complete clearance of lesions was detected in 40%, 20%, and 60% of patients in Candida monotherapy, Cervarix/Candida, and Gardasil/Candida groups, respectively, whereas 40%, 60%, and 20% of patients in the three groups, respectively, showed partial response. Only 10% of the control group had a partial response. Therapeutic outcomes were significantly better in the three treatment groups compared to the control group, with no statistically significant difference between the Candida monotherapy group and the combination groups, but the response was significantly better in the Gardasil/Candida group than in the Cervarix/Candida group. No statistically significant difference was found between the studied groups regarding the development of side effects. Moreover, no recurrence was detected in any of the groups throughout the 3-month follow-up period. Based on our results,combining intralesional HPV vaccines with Candida antigen immunotherapy may haveno significant benefit for treating multiple AGWs. Candida antigen may be recommended as a relatively effective and inexpensive therapeutic modality. The combination of Gardasil and Candida was also effective but very expensive. The results of the Cervarix/Candida combination were unsatisfactory. This clinical trial was registered and approved prospectively by the ethical review board at Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University.

Efficacy and Safety of Intralesional Immunotherapy with Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative among Cutaneous Wart Patients.

Cutaneous warts are common skin problems caused by Human Papilloma Virus. Conventional therapies are mostly ablative and limited by recurrences and side effects. Immunotherapy using bacterial, fungal, and viral antigens is an emerging and safer technique to treat warts at local and distant sites. The objective of this study was to measure the efficacy and safety of intralesional immunotherapy with tuberculin purified protein derivative among cutaneous wart patients in the dermatology department of a tertiary care centre. A cross sectional, time series design, was conducted between October 2019 and September 2020 among 77 patients of cutaneous warts attending Dermatology out-patient department using convenience sampling. Percentage response was evaluated for patients treated with tuberculin purified protein derivative for eight weeks at an interval of two weeks into complete response (100% clearance), partial response (50-99% clearance), no response (0-49% clearance). Side effects were also recorded. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0 was used for data analysis. Out of 77 patients, complete response (100%) was seen in 53.2% patients, partial response (50-99%) in 14.3% and no response (0-49%) was seen in 32.5%. Side effects noted were pain and erythema (19.50%), blisters (2.60%) and flu like symptoms (1.30%). Intralesional PPD is an effective and safer therapeutic option for the treatment of cutaneous warts.

Intralesional immunotherapy with Bacille Calmette- Guerin (BCG) vaccine for the treatment of cutaneous warts

Myriad of therapeutic modalities for warts are available but none promises complete response. Despite adequate treatment, the virus may persist in the surrounding tissues leading to recurrence. Immunotherapy is considered better than destructive options where there are multiple lesions, extensive involvement and is best suitable for paediatric patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intralesional BCG vaccine in the management of cutaneous warts (common warts, plantar and periungual warts). Patients of age 12 years and above clinically diagnosed with cutaneous warts and presenting consecutively in the outdoor clinic of Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy Department of Dr. R.P. Govt. Medical College, Kangra at Tanda, Himachal Pradesh between June 2021 to May 2022 were enrolled. BCG vaccine was administered into the largest wart intralesionally and the injection was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of four injections or till the complete clearance of warts, whichever was earlier. The efficacy was assessed every 3 weeks and patients were followed up at 3 and 6 months. Majority of patients were in the age group of 14-53 years. The study showed therapeutic response in 35.08% (20/57) patients and partial response in 63.15% (36/57) patients while there was no response in 1.75% (1/57) patients at the end of 12 weeks with a very low recurrence rate (5.2%). Plantar warts have responded excellently showing complete clearance in 91.5% and partial response in 9.5% of the patients followed by palmar warts achieving complete response in 60% and partial response in 40% of the patients. The reconstituted BCG immunotherapy is a cheap, effective and easily available therapeutic option which can easily be practised routinely. However, due its considerable adverse effects as compared to other immunotherapeutic agents, we do not recommend it to be the first line agent.

Efficacy of Intralesional Immunotherapy with Vitamin D3 Injection in Cutaneous Warts: A Clinical Observational Study

Background: Skin warts are benign tumors caused by infection of keratinocytes with human papillomavirus (HPV), visible as well-defined hyperkeratotic protrusions. Recently, immunotherapy is emerging as a new modality in the treatment of viral warts. Immunotherapy using Vitamin D3 is being tried widely for the treatment of warts. It is based on enhancing the immune system to achieve an HPV-targeted immune reaction. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional Vitamin D3 for the treatment of viral warts. Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based longitudinal study of 55 patients with viral warts. 0.5 ml Vitamin D3 solution (600,000 IU, 15 mg/ml) was injected in the base of the wart. A maximum of four warts per session were injected at 2-week intervals until resolution or for a maximum of four treatment sessions. The clinical assessment was done by pre- and posttreatment photographic comparison at baseline, before each treatment session, and after the completion of treatment. Results: Thirty-five patients (63.63%) showed complete clearance, 15 patients (27.27%) showed partial clearance, and 5 patients (9.09%) patients showed no improvement. No significant side effects were observed except for pain and mild swelling at the site of injection. Conclusion: Intralesional Vitamin D3 immunotherapy seemed to be an effective, safe, inexpensive treatment with minimal side effects.

Treatment of warts by intralesional immunotherapy

Treatment of warts by intralesional immunotherapy

P55 Real-world clinical and patient-reported outcomes of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) treatment for melanoma in transit and nodal metastases at a UK centre

Abstract Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-approved oncolytic viral intralesional immunotherapy licensed for unresectable stage III(B)–IV(M1a) melanoma. It is a genetically modified herpes simplex virus that selectively replicates in tumour cells, leading to local and systemic antitumour immune responses, improving overall survival. The randomized phase III OPTiM trial reported a complete response in 28.2% of patients (Andtbacka RH, Collichio F, Harrington KJ et al. Final analyses of OPTiM: a randomized phase III trial of talimogene laherparepvec vs. granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in unresectable stage III–IV melanoma. J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7:145). We report a retrospective review of clinical and patient-reported outcomes of a dermatology-led T-VEC service at a regional UK melanoma centre between January 2019 and January 2023. Treatment involves a loading dose and then two-weekly nurse-delivered intralesional injections. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, toxicities, treatment responses and patient satisfaction were recorded. Sixteen patients (11 women and five men) were treated; the average patient age was 73 years (range 42–87). Seven patients had stage IIIB disease, six stage IIIC and three stage IVM1a. Eight had received prior nonsurgical treatments (adjuvant therapy, electrochemotherapy, diphencyprone). The number of lesions treated per visit ranged from 1 to 24 (median 5) over a median of six visits (range 2–24). Four patients (25%) had a complete response (CR), with median time to CR being 8 weeks; all have maintained the response (range 6–45 months). Eight (50%) showed partial response (PR), with three continuing treatment. Nine patients overall had progressive disease (five in the PR group and four who were nonresponders). In total, five patients died. Patients experienced mainly flu-like symptoms (44%), pyrexia (31%), fatigue (19%), muscle pain (19%), nausea (19%), headache (19%), diarrhoea (6%), joint pain (6%), local swelling (19%), lymphadenopathy (6%) and mild pain (25%). No grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was returned by seven of eight patients who completed treatment. All said they received adequate information to make treatment decisions. Eighty-six per cent rated the service excellent. Our results show comparable efficacy and side-effects to published clinical trials and demonstrate that T-VEC is a well-tolerated and safe treatment option, delaying or potentially avoiding need for more toxic systemic agents. We highlight that dermatologists and nurse specialists are well placed to deliver T-VEC in patients with melanoma.

Evaluation of needling-induced autoinoculation in the management of genital warts.

Genital warts caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) are one of the most common sexually transmitted infections. Long latency, lesions' multiplicity, high recurrence rate, and the tendency to malignant transformation are essential challenges during management. Traditional treatment modalities are known to be lesion-directed while intralesional immunotherapy was introduced to act beyond individual lesions and to confront the previous challenges through injection of known antigens,such as measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, to stimulate the immune system against HPV. Needling-induced autoinoculation is also considred as an immunotherapeutic procedure that does not include the injection of antigens. We evaluated the efficacy of needling-induced autoinoculation in the management of genital warts. Fifty patients with multiple recurrent (≥4) genital warts were divided into two equal groups. One group was subjected to needling-induced autoinoculation and the other was subjected to intralesional MMR injection every 2 weeks for a maximum of three sessions. Follow-up was done for 8 weeks after the last session. Both needling and MMR showed statistically significant therapeutic outcome. Needling showed significant improvement with regard to thenumber (P = 0.000) and size (P = 0.003) of lesions. In parallel, MMR showed significant improvement with regard to the number (P = 0.001) and size (P = 0.021) of lesions. There was no statistically significant difference between both treatments outcomes in regard to number (P = 0.860) and size (P = 0.929) of lesions. Both needling and MMR are effective immunotherapeutic modalities in management of genital warts. Needling-induced autoinoculation, being more safe and inexpensive, may be considered as a competing choice.

A Comparative Study of Intralesional Acyclovir vs Immunotherapy for Treatment of Viral Warts.

Viral warts are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), are difficult to treat with conventional modalities, and are cosmetically disfiguring; hence, immunomodulators are being used. The viral origin of warts suggests the antiviral drug acyclovir as a potential therapeutic option. The current study compares the effect of intralesional acyclovir (nucleoside analogue) and intralesional purified protein derivative (PPD) (immunotherapy) in treating various viral warts. Prospective observational comparative study was conducted to determine the efficacy of acyclovir, and PPD administered via the intralesional route in patients with viral warts. The study population was categorized into two groups. One group received intralesional acyclovir, and the other received intralesional PPD. Patients were followed-up with for three months. Outcomes considered in our study were recovery (complete, partial, and no recovery) and side effects like pain, burning sensation, and desquamation. Statistical analysis was carried out by coguide software. In our study total of 40 participants, 20 in each group were included. 25 and 15 were of age <30, and ≥ 30, respectively, while 20 were males, and 20 females. Our study reported 60%, and 30% of complete recovery with intralesional acyclovir treatment and intralesional PPD treatment, respectively, in the twelfth week. However, p-value > 0.05 represented no significance between groups. 90% in the acyclovir-treated group presented with pain, and 100% presented with burning sensation, while in the case of PPD-treated group, 60% presented no side effects and the rest 40% showed pain. Intralesional acyclovir is more effective in treating viral warts than PPD. The focus is to be laid on anticipated side effects.

Heterologous effect of influenza vaccination on molluscum contagiosum infection; a case report of siblings

BackgroundMolluscum contagiosum virus (MCV) is a benign, common cutaneous infection predominantly affecting the younger pediatric population. Traditional treatments may be time consuming with variable efficacy. Time to spontaneous resolution is variable and treatment is often sought to shorten duration of infection, prevent further autoinoculation, prevent infectious spread to others and treat cosmetic intolerability.Case presentationWe present the case of two patients with complete, simultaneous clearance of their molluscum contagiosum infections after receiving a routine 2018 quadrivalent influenza vaccination. Neither patient has had recurrence of molluscum contagiosum or permanent scarring. We review trials of intralesional immunotherapy in treatment of cutaneous infections to theorize the mechanism of MCV infection clearance post influenza vaccination.ConclusionWe propose a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction was induced as a heterologous effect of the influenza vaccination, similar to that seen in current immunotherapy treatments. This is the first reported case of MCV-directed immune reaction with infection clearance after influenza vaccination.