Intrafraction Organ Motion Research Articles

Pancreatic SABR using peritumoral fiducials, triggered imaging and breath-hold.

Background: We aim to present our linear accelerator-based workflow for pancreatic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in order to address the following issues: intrafractional organ motion management, Cone Beam CT (CBCT) image quality, residual errors with dosimetric consequences, treatment time, and clinical results. Methods: Between 2016 and 2021, 14 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with induction chemotherapy and SABR using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Internal target volume (ITV) concept (5), phase-gated (4), or breath hold (5) techniques were used. Treatment was verified by CBCT before and after irradiation, while tumor motion was monitored and controlled by kV triggered imaging and beam hold using peritumoral surgical clips. Beam interruptions and treatment time were recorded. The CBCT image quality was scored and supplemented by an agreement analysis (Krippendorff's-α) of breath-hold CBCT images to determine the position of OARs relative to the planning risk volumes (PRV). Residual errors and their dosimetry impact were also calculated. Progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier analysis with acute and late toxicity reporting (CTCAEv4). Results: On average, beams were interrupted once (range: 0-3) per treatment session on triggered imaging. The total median treatment time was 16.7 ± 10.8min, significantly less for breath-hold vs. phase-gated sessions (18.8 ± 6.2 vs. 26.5 ± 13.4, p < 0.001). The best image quality was achieved by breath hold CBCT. The Krippendorff's-α test showed a strong agreement among five radiation therapists (mean K-α value: 0.8 (97.5%). The mean residual errors were <0.2cm in each direction resulting in an average difference of <2% in dosimetry for OAR and target volume. Two patients received offline adaptation. The median OS/PFS after induction chemotherapy and SABR was 20/12months and 15/8months. No Gr. ≥2 acute/late RT-related toxicity was noted. Conclusion: Linear accelerator based pancreatic SABR with the combination of CBCT and triggered imaging + beam hold is feasible. Peritumoral fiducials improve utility while breath-hold CBCT provides the best image quality at a reasonable treatment time with offline adaptation possibilities. In well-selected cases, it can be an effective alternative in clinics where CBCT/MRI-guided online adaptive workflow is not available.

Impact of intrafraction motion in pancreatic cancer treatments with MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy.

The total time of radiation treatment delivery for pancreatic cancer patients with daily online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on an MR-Linac can range from 50 to 90min. During this period, the target and normal tissues undergo changes due to respiration and physiologic organ motion. We evaluated the dosimetric impact of the intrafraction physiological organ changes. Ten locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients were treated with 50 Gy in five fractions with intensity-modulated respiratory-gated radiation therapy on a 0.35-T MR-Linac. Patients received both pre- and post-treatment volumetric MRIs for each fraction. Gastrointestinal organs at risk (GI-OARs) were delineated on the pre-treatment MRI during the online ART process and retrospectively on the post-treatment MRI. The treated dose distribution for each adaptive plan was assessed on the post-treatment anatomy. Prescribed dose volume histogram metrics for the scheduled plan on the pre-treatment anatomy, the adapted plan on the pre-treatment anatomy, and the adapted plan on post-treatment anatomy were compared to the OAR-defined criteria for adaptation: the volume of the GI-OAR receiving greater than 33 Gy (V33Gy) should be ≤1 cubic centimeter. Across the 50 adapted plans for the 10 patients studied, 70% were adapted to meet the duodenum constraint, 74% for the stomach, 12% for the colon, and 48% for the small bowel. Owing to intrafraction organ motion, at the time of post-treatment imaging, the adaptive criteria were exceeded for the duodenum in 62% of fractions, the stomach in 36%, the colon in 10%, and the small bowel in 48%. Compared to the scheduled plan, the post-treatment plans showed a decrease in the V33Gy, demonstrating the benefit of plan adaptation for 66% of the fractions for the duodenum, 95% for the stomach, 100% for the colon, and 79% for the small bowel. Post-treatment images demonstrated that over the course of the adaptive plan generation and delivery, the GI-OARs moved from their isotoxic low-dose region and nearer to the dose-escalated high-dose region, exceeding dose-volume constraints. Intrafraction motion can have a significant dosimetric impact; therefore, measures to mitigate this motion are needed. Despite consistent intrafraction motion, plan adaptation still provides a dosimetric benefit.

Assessment of intrafractional motion of the cervix-uterus by MR-guided radiotherapy system†.

The uterus is known as one of the moving organs. We evaluated the movement of the uterus during irradiation and the effects of changes in the surrounding organs using a magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy system. Seven patients with cervical cancer underwent pre- and posttreatment MR imaging to assess changes in the positioning of the uterus and cervix as well as the alterations in bladder and rectal volume. The study revealed that the movements of the uterus were greater than that of the cervix and showed a tendency to correlate with the bladder rather than the rectum. We also examined whether intrafractional motion could lead to insufficient dose coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV), specifically focusing on the D98% of the CTV in the uterine body and cervix. The impact of intrafractional motion on the D98% varied among patients, with one out of the seven patients experiencing an average dosimetric change of -2.6Gy in the uterus, although larger planning target volume margins of 1.5cm were applied, therefore, indicating the need for individualized optimal margins in each case. Online adaptive radiotherapy offers the advantage of modifying the treatment plan when irradiating moving organs, such as the uterus. However, it should be noted that this approach may result in longer overall treatment times compared with the traditional methods. Therefore, we must carefully consider the influence of intrafractional organ motions when opting for such a treatment.

MRI-based inter- and intrafraction motion analysis of the pancreatic tail and spleen as preparation for adaptive MRI-guided radiotherapy in neuroblastoma

BackgroundIn pediatric radiotherapy treatment planning of abdominal tumors, dose constraints to the pancreatic tail/spleen are applied to reduce late toxicity. In this study, an analysis of inter- and intrafraction motion of the pancreatic tail/spleen is performed to estimate the potential benefits of online MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT).Materials and methodsTen randomly selected neuroblastoma patients (median age: 3.4 years), irradiated with intensity-modulated arc therapy at our department (prescription dose: 21.6/1.8 Gy), were retrospectively evaluated for inter- and intrafraction motion of the pancreatic tail/spleen. Three follow-up MRIs (T2- and T1-weighted ± gadolinium) were rigidly registered to a planning CT (pCT), on the vertebrae around the target volume. The pancreatic tail/spleen were delineated on all MRIs and pCT. Interfraction motion was defined as a center of gravity change between pCT and T2-weighted images in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP) and cranial-caudal (CC) direction. For intrafraction motion analysis, organ position on T1-weighted ± gadolinium was compared to T2-weighted. The clinical radiation plan was used to estimate the dose received by the pancreatic tail/spleen for each position.ResultsThe median (IQR) interfraction motion was minimal in LR/AP, and largest in CC direction; pancreatic tail 2.5 mm (8.9), and spleen 0.9 mm (3.9). Intrafraction motion was smaller, but showed a similar motion pattern (pancreatic tail, CC: 0.4 mm (1.6); spleen, CC: 0.9 mm (2.8)). The differences of Dmean associated with inter- and intrafraction motions ranged from − 3.5 to 5.8 Gy for the pancreatic tail and − 1.2 to 3.0 Gy for the spleen. In 6 out of 10 patients, movements of the pancreatic tail and spleen were highlighted as potentially clinically significant because of ≥ 1 Gy dose constraint violation.ConclusionInter- and intrafraction organ motion results into unexpected constrain violations in 60% of a randomly selected neuroblastoma cohort, supporting further prospective exploration of MRgRT.

A CARDIAC MOTION MODEL TO EVALUATE INTRA-FRACTION DOSIMETRIC VARIATIONS IN RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENTS

Purpose: A cardiac cycle model was implemented to simulate cardiac motion during radiotherapy to evaluate the intra-fraction dosimetric impact on cardiac sub-structures comparing different planning techniques. Methods: Cardiac sub-structures were automatically contoured in 10 CTs acquired in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) by using a recently developed hierarchical-clustering atlas-based algorithm. A deformable image registration algorithm was used to simulate the cardiac motion cycle based on volume variations available in the literature. Two synthetic CTs were created and contoured simulating contraction and expansion during the cardiac cycle. Ninety radiotherapy plans were calculated using three radiotherapy paradigms: tangential fields planned as Linac-3D-CRT with a steep linear dose gradient toward the heart-modulated therapy with an intermediately steep concave gradient of intermediate-to-high doses toward the heart, planned as Linac-VMAT; modulated therapy with a steep concave gradient of intermediate-to-high doses toward the heart, planned as helical tomotherapy. Python scripts were developed for autocontouring, automatic creation of synthetic CTs and data extraction. Results: Comparison between paradigms shows that different constraints (maximal gradient toward heart/lung versus maximal sparing of contralateral breast/axilla) do not necessarily result in preferred or reduced heart sparing, but this depends more on individual anatomy. A planning paradigm with an intermediate-steepness dose gradient showed the best robustness against intra-fraction organ motion. Conclusions: Patient-specific organ motion models may reduce differences between planned and delivered RT and may thus help to refine dose–volume–toxicity models for cardiac sub-structures and, as a consequence, clinical constraints. Automatized plan recalculation on synthetic image sets might be used for robustness optimization and evaluation.

Analysis of the interplay effect in lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy based on both breathing motion and plan characteristics

Abstract Introduction: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is susceptible to challenges for tumours affected by intrafraction organ motion. This study aims to investigate the effect of breathing characteristics and plan complexity on the interplay effect. Methods: A patient-specific interplay effect evaluation was performed using in-house software with an alpha version of the treatment planning verification software Verisoft (PTW-Freiburg, Germany) on VMAT plans. The OCTAVIUS 4D phantom was used to acquire the static dose distribution, and the simulation approach was utilised to generate the moving dose distribution. The influence of plan complexity, PTV size, number of breaths, and motion amplitudes on the interplay effect were examined. The dose distribution of two extreme phases—end-inhale and end-exhale—was considered using the gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm for the interplay effect evaluation. Results: A strong correlation was found between the motion amplitude (p &lt; 0.001) and the NBs (p &lt; 0.001) with the gamma-passing rate. No correlation was found between the gamma-passing rate and the PTV size or plan complexity. Conclusion: The simulation tool allowed the analysis of a large number of breathing traces, demonstrating how free-breathing patients, suspected of high interplay, could be selected for other motion management solutions. The simulated cases showed strong interplay effects for long breathing periods with extended motion amplitudes in a small group of patients.

CBCT-based Prostate IGRT With and Without Implanted Markers: Assessment of Geometric Corrections and Time for Completion.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the most commonly used system in modern radiotherapy of prostate cancer for daily positioning verification. The use of intraprostatic radiopaque fiducials (FMs) may be added to CBCT. We wanted to investigate the possible advantage of using FMs in daily CBCT repositioning. We selected three CBCTs for each treatment course for 13 patients (seven with and six without use of FMs) treated at our centre. Seven experienced Radiation Oncologists retrospectively reviewed the CBCTs, recording couch movements for correct patient positioning, and time spent to do it. Analysis of variance and t-test were carried out for comparison of different groups and for differences in mean values of the movements recorded (with p<0.05 as significance level). No statistically significant difference was found between operators in the analysis of images with FMs nor of images without them. A difference was only found in the mean corrections in couch rotation and pitch angle, which were higher in the FM group, and in the mean time for image analysis, which was shorter in this group. Using the van Herk formula, we found a possible reduction of clinical target volume and planning target volume margins for the FM group. According to our study, the use of intraprostatic FMs in daily CBCT seems useful for better detection of and correction for non-negligible rotational errors. Furthermore, FMs reduced the time to treatment start, which is very important in reducing the risk of intrafraction organ motion. These results need to be confirmed by further studies.

Geometric and Dosimetric Evaluation of Using a Novel Tongue Positioning Device to Reduce Tongue Motions during Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Inter- and intra-fractional organ motion in the head and neck region can reduce the precision of radiation therapy (RT). Among the organs, a tongue has substantial changes in its position and volume. Therefore, various types of tongue positioning devices have been used during RT for head and neck cancer. Despite of several clinical studies reporting an efficacy of using tongue positioning device, there are no studies investigating the inter-fractional reproducibility of position and shape of tongue while using a tongue positioning device. This study performs geometric and dosimetric evaluation of a novel tongue positioning device during RT for head and neck cancer. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Fifty-two patients with head and neck tumors using tongue positioning device were available for analysis. All patients were treated in 28 fractions using VMAT technique with cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging. CBCT images were taken at 1^st, 7^th, 11^th, 15^th, 19^th, 23^th, and 27^th fractions. In order to evaluate the difference in geometry of the tongue between the CT simulation and the treatment at each fraction, tongues in simulation CT images and CBCT images were contoured in treatment planning system by a trained radiation oncologist. The geometric differences of the tongue between planning CT (pCT) and CBCT were assessed by Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and averaged Hausdorff distance (AVD). In addition, 2D <i>in vivo</i> measurements using radiochromic films were performed for thirteen patients once a week during RT for 5 weeks. The films were attached to heads of the devices. The planned dose distributions at the surface of the head of device was compared to the measured dose distributions by using gamma analysis with criteria of 3%/3mm. <h3>Results</h3> For entire patients, DSC scored 0.77 to 0.80. The DSC at 1^st fraction (i.e., pCT vs. 1^st CBCT) was 0.80 while the DSC at 27^th fraction (i.e., pCT vs. 27^th CBCT) was 0.77. There was no statistical significance between the DSC at 1^st fraction and the DSC at 27^th fraction (p-value > 0.05). On the other hand, AVD ranged from 1.78 mm to 2.25 mm. The AVD was increased as the fractions were proceeded. There was difference between the AVD at 1^st fraction and the AVD at 23^th fraction and 27^th fraction with a statistical significance (p-value < 0.05). <i>In vivo</i> measurements showed averaged gamma passing rate of 90.54%. There was no significant difference between the measurements at 1^st week and those at other weeks. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Comparison of geometry of the tongue during RT for head and neck cancer was performed with pCT and CBCT. The AVD showed maximum 2.25 mm difference between pCT and CBCT. The AVD difference between the fractions was within 0.47 mm. DSC showed no significant inter-fractional differences. In conclusion, the novel tongue positioning device was found to minimize the inter-fractional variations of position and shape of the tongue.

Intrafraction Prostate Motion Management during Dose-Escalated Linac-Based SBRT

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> This study reports the first clinical experience worldwide using a novel electromagnetic (EM) tracking device for intrafraction prostate motion management during dose-escalated Linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Thirteen patients with organ-confined prostate cancer underwent dose-escalated SBRT using flattening filter-free (FFF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The prescribed dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions or 38 Gy in 4 fractions. The EM tracking device consisted of an integrated Foley catheter with a transmitter. Patients were simulated and treated with a filled bladder and an empty rectum. Setup accuracy was achieved by ConeBeam-CT (CBCT) matching and the prostate motion was tracked during all the procedure. Treatment was interrupted when the signals exceeded a 2 mm threshold in any of the three spatial directions and, unless the offset was transient, target position was re-defined by repeating CBCT. Moreover, the displacements that would have occurred without any intrafraction organ motion management (i.e., no interruptions and repositionings) were simulated and analyzed. <h3>Results</h3> In 31 out of 56 monitored fractions (55%), no intervention was required to correct the target position as a result of an excessive displacement. In 25 (45%) a correction was mandated, but only in 10 (18%), the beam delivery was interrupted. Total treatment time lasted on average 10.2 minutes, 6.7 minutes for setup, and 3.5 minutes for beam delivery. The prostate was found inside the 2 mm threshold from its initial position in 96% of the treatment time, i.e., in 94% of the time during the setup, and in 98% during the delivery (beam on + interruptions). Without any intrafraction motion management, the overall mean treatment time and the mean delivery time would have been 6.9 minutes and 3.2 minutes, respectively. The prostate would have been found outside the tolerance in 8% of the total session time, in 4% of the time during the setup, and in 14% during the beam-on phase. The probability of motion > 2 mm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical direction after 5 minutes was 3.6% (2/56), 8.9% (5/56), and 14.3% (8/56), respectively. The predominant motion pattern was posterior with a mean motion ≤ 2 mm occurring within 10 minutes. Moreover, the analysis of the rotation angles from all patients showed a systematic rotation in the pitch axis which is absent in the yaw axis. Concurrently, the range and standard deviation of rotation angles were larger in the pitch axis. <h3>Conclusion</h3> EM real-time tracking was successfully implemented for intrafraction motion management during dose-escalated prostate SBRT. Results showed that most of the observed displacements were < 2 mm in any direction; however, there were a non-insignificant number of fractions with motion exceeding the predefined threshold, which would have otherwise gone undetected without intrafraction motion management.

Intrafraction Prostate Motion Management During Dose-Escalated Linac-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

BackgroundExtreme hypofractionation requires tight planning margins, high dose gradients, and strict adherence to planning criteria in terms of patient positioning and organ motion mitigation. This study reports the first clinical experience worldwide using a novel electromagnetic (EM) tracking device for intrafraction prostate motion management during dose-escalated linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).MethodsThirteen patients with organ-confined prostate cancer underwent dose-escalated SBRT using flattening filter-free (FFF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The EM tracking device consisted of an integrated Foley catheter with a transmitter. Patients were simulated and treated with a filled bladder and an empty rectum. Setup accuracy was achieved by ConeBeam-CT (CBCT) matching, and motion was tracked during all the procedure. Treatment was interrupted when the signals exceeded a 2 mm threshold in any of the three spatial directions and, unless the offset was transient, target position was re-defined by repeating CBCT. Moreover, the displacements that would have occurred without any intrafraction organ motion management (i.e. no interruptions and repositionings) were simulated.ResultsIn 31 out of 56 monitored fractions (55%), no intervention was required to correct the target position. In 25 (45%) a correction was mandated, but only in 10 (18%), the beam delivery was interrupted. Total treatment time lasted on average 10.2 minutes, 6.7 minutes for setup, and 3.5 minutes for beam delivery. Without any intrafraction motion management, the overall mean treatment time and the mean delivery time would have been 6.9 minutes and 3.2 minutes, respectively. The prostate would have been found outside the tolerance in 8% of the total session time, in 4% of the time during the setup, and in 14% during the beam-on phase. Predominant motion pattern was posterior and its probability increased with time, with a mean motion ≤ 2 mm occurring within 10 minutes.ConclusionsEM real-time tracking was successfully implemented for intrafraction motion management during dose-escalated prostate SBRT. Results showed that most of the observed displacements were < 2 mm in any direction; however, there were a non-insignificant number of fractions with motion exceeding the predefined threshold, which would have otherwise gone undetected without intrafraction motion management.

Feasibility of Ablative SBRT Treatment of Pancreas Patients on an MR-Linac

To report on our early experience of treating patients with pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with ablative SBRT (50 Gy in 5 fractions) on the Elekta Unity MR-Linac.Ten PDAC patients were treated with abdominal compression (AC) and daily online plan adaptation using Adapt-to-Shape (ATS) workflow. AC is the method of choice to reduce breathing motion since automatic breath-hold/gating or other motion management options are not yet available on Unity MR-Linac. Three tumors were located in the head of the pancreas and seven were in the body. Seven patients were considered inoperable per surgeon and six were node positive. Average GTV volume during simulation was 42.5 ± 24.8 cc. Three orthogonal plane cine MRI were acquired to assess AC belt pressure during MR simulation as well as during each treatment fraction to assess stability of AC in minimizing tumor motion. Three sets of 3D T2w MR scans, pre-treatment (MRIpre), verification (MRIver) and post-treatment (MRIpost) MRI, were acquired for online planning. To assess the dosimetric impact of intrafraction organ motion, a post-treatment quality assurance (QA) was performed before the next fraction by propagating pre-treatment plan and structures to both MRIver and MRIpost, editing the contours and recalculating dose. GTV coverage and selected organs-at-risk (OAR) dose constraints (e.g., < 33 Gy to 0.035 cc, < 25 Gy to 2 cc and < 25 Gy to 5cc volume) were evaluated on MRIver and MRIpost.Median total treatment time was 75.5(49-132) minutes. Average contouring, planning, physics QA and beam-on time was 25.1 ± 11.9, 12.2 ± 6.0, 1.9 ± 1.5 and 14.1 ± 3.7 mins respectively. Average AP, LR and SI motion in FB and with compression was 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.6 ± 0.2 and 0.7 ± 0.2 and 0.2 ± 0.1, 0.2 ± 0.1, 0.4 ± 0.1 cm respectively, indicating that compression belt was effective in minimizing patient breathing motion. Average tumor motion in AC belt for all fractions was 0.2 ± 0.1, 0.2 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.2 cm in AP, LR and SI direction. Median GTV coverage was 78.7% of Rx dose for all fractions. Average GTV Dmax and GTV mean dose for all the fractions was 57.4 ± 0.7 and 51.2 ± 1.6 Gy respectively. Average 0.035 cc, D2cc and D5cc stomach dose was 34.4 ± 5.4, 26.7 ± 2.9 and 24.3 ± 2.1 Gy on MRIver and 35.3 ± 6.2, 27.0 ± 3.3 and 24.6 ± 2.5 Gy on MRIpost. Average 0.035 cc, D2cc and D5cc small bowel dose was 35.1 ± 6.3, 27.1 ± 3.6 and 24.4 ± 2.6 Gy on MRIver and 35.5 ± 6.5, 27.3 ± 3.9 and 24.6 ± 2.5 Gy on MRIpost.MR-guided adaptive RT enables delivery of curative dose to pancreatic tumors by taking into account interfraction motion of gastrointestinal OARs in daily adaptive planning. To manage intrafraction motion in our current clinical workflow, the organ motion is assessed for first two fractions and conservative strategies (e.g., bigger PRV margins or change the directive to keep stomach 0.035 cc dose to < 30 Gy) are employed for later fractions. ATS workflow with AC and the post-treatment QA allow safe delivery of ablative radiation doses for selected cases of PDAC on Unity MR-Linac.N. Tyagi: Honoraria; Elekta. Travel Expenses; Elekta; ISMRM.J. Liang: None. S. Burleson: None. E. Subashi: None. P. Godoy Scripes: None. K.R. Tringale: None. P.B. Romesser: Travel Expenses; Elekta. M. Reyngold: None. C.H. Crane: Honoraria; Elekta. Travel Expenses; Elekta.

PO-1538 Inter- and intrafraction organ motion for cervical cancer patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac

PO-1538 Inter- and intrafraction organ motion for cervical cancer patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac

Feasibility of ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy of pancreas cancer patients on a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance-linac system using abdominal compression.

Background and PurposeStereotactic body radiation therapy delivered using MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) and automatic breathold gating has shown to improve overall survival for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. The goal of our study was to evaluate feasibility of treating LAPC patients using abdominal compression (AC) and impact of potential intrafraction motion on planned dose on a 1.5T MR-linac.Methods & MaterialsTen LAPC patients were treated with MRgRT to 50 Gy in 5 fractions with daily online plan adaptation and AC. Three orthogonal plane cine MRI were acquired to assess stability of AC pressure in minimizing tumor motion. Three sets of T2w MR scans, pre-treatment (MRIpre), verification (MRIver) and post-treatment (MRIpost) MRI, were acquired for every fraction. A total of 150 MRIs and doses were evaluated. Impact of intrafraction organ motion was evaluated by propagating pre-treatment plan and structures to MRIver and MRIpost, editing contours and recalculating doses. Gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) doses were evaluated on MRIver and MRIpost.ResultsMedian total treatment time was 75.5 (49–132) minutes. Median tumor motion in AC for all fractions was 1.7 (0.7–7), 2.1 (0.6–6.3) and 4.1 (1.4–10.0) mm in anterior-posterior, left–right and superior-inferior direction. Median GTV V50Gy was 78.7%. Median D5cm3 stomach_duodenum was 24.2 (18.4–29.3) Gy on MRIver and 24.2 (18.3–30.5) Gy on MRIpost. Median D5cm3 small bowel was 24.3 (18.2–32.8) Gy on MRIver and 24.4 (16.0–33.6) Gy on MRIpost.ConclusionDose-volume constraints for OARs were exceeded for some fractions on MRIver and MRIpost. Longer follow up is needed to see the dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion on gastrointestinal toxicity.

Organ motion in linac-based SBRT for glottic cancer

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate inter- and intra-fraction organ motion as well as to quantify clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins to be adopted in the stereotactic treatment of early stage glottic cancer.Methods and materialsStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to 36 Gy in 3 fractions was administered to 23 patients with early glottic cancer T1N0M0. Patients were irradiated with a volumetric intensity modulated arc technique delivered with 6 MV FFF energy. Each patient underwent a pre-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to correct the setup based on the thyroid cartilage position. Imaging was repeated if displacement exceeded 2 mm in any direction. CBCT imaging was also performed after each treatment arc as well as at the end of the delivery. Swallowing was allowed only during the beam-off time between arcs. CBCT images were reviewed to evaluate inter- and intra-fraction organ motion. The relationships between selected treatment characteristics, both beam-on and delivery times as well as organ motion were investigated.ResultsFor the population systematic (Ʃ) and random (σ) inter-fraction errors were 0.9, 1.3 and 0.6 mm and 1.1, 1.3 and 0.7 mm in the left-right (X), cranio-caudal (Y) and antero-posterior (Z) directions, respectively. From the analysis of CBCT images acquired after treatment, systematic (Ʃ) and random (σ) intra-fraction errors resulted 0.7, 1.6 and 0.7 mm and 1.0, 1.5 and 0.6 mm in the X, Y and Z directions, respectively. Margins calculated from the intra-fraction errors were 2.4, 5.1 and 2.2 mm in the X, Y and Z directions respectively. A statistically significant difference was found for the displacement in the Z direction between patients irradiated with > 2 arcs versus ≤ 2 arcs, (MW test, p = 0.038). When analyzing mean data from CBCT images for the whole treatment, a significant correlation was found between the time of delivery and the three dimensional displacement vector (r = 0.489, p = 0.055), the displacement in the Y direction (r = 0.553, p = 0.026) and the subsequent margins to be adopted (r = 0.626, p = 0.009). Finally, displacements and the subsequent margins to be adopted in Y direction were significantly greater for treatments with more than 2 arcs (MW test p = 0.037 and p = 0.019, respectively).ConclusionsIn the setting of controlled swallowing during treatment delivery, intra-fraction motion still needs to be taken into account when planning with estimated CTV to PTV margins of 3, 5 and 3 mm in the X, Y and Z directions, respectively. Selected treatments may require additional margins.

Time-resolved dosimetry for validation of 4D dose calculation in PBS proton therapy

Four-dimensional dose calculation (4D-DC) is crucial for predicting the dosimetric outcome in the presence of intra-fractional organ motion. Time-resolved dosimetry can provide significant insights into 4D pencil beam scanning dose accumulation and is therefore irreplaceable for benchmarking 4D-DC. In this study a novel approach of time-resolved dosimetry using five PinPoint ionization chambers (ICs) embedded in an anthropomorphic dynamic phantom was employed and validated against beam delivery details. Beam intensity variations as well as the beam delivery time structure were well reflected with an accuracy comparable to the temporal resolution of the IC measurements. The 4D dosimetry approach was further applied for benchmarking the 4D-DC implemented in the RayStation 6.99 treatment planning system. Agreement between computed values and measurements was investigated for (i) partial doses based on individual breathing phases, and (ii) temporally distributed cumulative doses. For varied beam delivery and patient-related parameters the average unsigned dose difference for (i) was 0.04 ± 0.03 Gy over all considered IC measurement values, while the prescribed physical dose was 2 Gy. By implementing (ii), a strong effect of the dose gradient on measurement accuracy was observed. The gradient originated from scanned beam energy modulation and target motion transversal to the beam. Excluding measurements in the high gradient the relative dose difference between measurements and 4D-DCs for a given treatment plan at the end of delivery was 3.5% on average and 6.6% at maximum over measurement points inside the target. Overall, the agreement between 4D dose measurements in the moving phantom and retrospective 4D-DC was found to be comparable to the static dose differences for all delivery scenarios. The presented 4D-DC has been proven to be suitable for simulating treatment deliveries with various beam- as well as patient-specific parameters and can therefore be employed for dosimetric validation of different motion mitigation techniques.

Assessment of abdominal organ motion using cine magnetic resonance imaging in different gastric motilities: a comparison between fasting and postprandial states

This study assessed abdominal organ motion induced by gastroduodenal motilities in volunteers during fasting and postprandial states, using cine magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). Thirty-five volunteers underwent cine-MRI while holding their breath in the fasting and postprandial states. Gastric motility was quantified by the amplitude and velocity of antral peristaltic waves. Duodenal motility was evaluated as the change of duodenal diameter. Abdominal organ motion was measured in the liver, pancreas and kidneys. Motion was quantified by calculating maximal organ displacement in the left–right, antero–posterior and caudal–cranial directions. Median antral amplitude and velocity in the fasting and postprandial states were 7.7 and 15.1 mm (P < 0.01), and 1.3 and 2.5 mm/s (P < 0.01), respectively. Duodenal motility did not change. Median displacement for all organs ranged from 0.9 to 2.9 mm in the fasting state and from 1.0 to 2.9 mm in the postprandial state. Significant increases in abdominal organ displacement in the postprandial state were observed in the right lobe of the liver, pancreatic head and both kidneys. Differences in the median displacement of these organs between the two states were all <1 mm. Although the motion of several abdominal organs increased in the postprandial state, the difference between the two states was quite small. Thus, our study suggests that treatment planning and irradiation need not include strict management of gastric conditions, nor the addition of excess margins to compensate for differences in the intra-fractional abdominal organ motion under different gastric motilities in the fasting and postprandial states.

PTV margin analysis for prostate patients treated with initial pelvic nodal IMRT and prostate proton boost

To evaluate the planning target volume (PTV) margins for prostate cancer patients treated with initial intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to pelvic lymph nodes and a proton boost to the prostate using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and radiographs as image guidance. We analyzed data from prostate patients (n = 15) treated with initial pelvic IMRT and a proton boost to the prostate. CBCT and 2-dimensional (2D) radiographs were used for IMRT and proton pre-treatment alignments, respectively. Translations from bony-matching, implanted marker seed matching, and seed-bony differences were obtained from CBCTs. Pretreatment and post-treatment 2D radiographs were analyzed for residual setup errors and intrafractional organ motion. PTV margins of prostate and pelvic lymph nodes for seed-matching, bony-matching and the skin mark-matching approach were obtained using 2.5 * Σ + 0.7 * σ formula, where Σ is the systematic error and σ is the random error summed in quadrature of various error components. For the seed-matching approach, the prostate margins were 1.5 mm, 3.5 mm, and 2.7 mm for the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively; pelvic lymph node margins were 2.3 mm, 7.1 mm, and 7.0 mm. For the bony-matching approach, the prostate margins were 2.7 mm, 7.8 mm, and 7.5 mm for the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively; pelvic lymph node margins were 0.7 mm, 1.5 mm, and 1.4 mm. For the skin mark-matching approach, the prostate margins were 7.6 mm, 13.4 mm, and 11.4 mm for the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively; pelvic lymph node margins were 8.2 mm, 12.6 mm, and 12.3 mm. The seed-matching approach, as compared to the bony-matching approach, reduced prostate margins, which may in turn reduce dose to the bladder and rectum at the expense of increased but acceptable margins for the pelvic lymph nodes.

P3.16-14 SBRT in Early Stages of Lung Cancer

We present the experience in our department with SBRT in early stages of lung cancer. Between April 2012 and January 2018, 59 patients with 65 different locations underwent to SBRT in early stages of lung cancer (51 men and 8 woman, with a median age of 76 years). 44 patients had histological confirmation (22 adenocarcinomas, 13 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 adenosquamous and 1 typical carcinoid). There was not histological confirmation in 15 patients. In all patients, PET-CT was used for the diagnosis. The T-stage classification (8th Edition of the TNM Classification), was the following: T1a (6), T1b (24), T1c (16), T2a (10), T2b (6), T3 (3). The treatment planning was made using vacuum body fixation and abdominal compression to reduce intrafractional organ motion. We made five CTs planning in all patients: 3 free breathing, inhalation and exhalation. The internal target volume (ITV) was delineated based on the fusion of five CTs. The planning target volume (PTV) was determined an adding additional setup margin to ITV. We made different fraction schemes, and the most used were 5x1200 cGy and 8x750 cGy. The assessment of response was performed with CT and/or PET-CT. With a median follow up of 24 months, the local control was 88%, with an overall survival of 76%. The tolerance to treatment was excellent, appearing as acute toxicity, rib pain (G1-G2) in 4 patients, asthenia (G1) in 3 patients, and as chronic toxicity, costal fracture in one patient. The local control obtained in early stages of lung cancer treated with SBRT in our series is high, with an excellent clinical tolerance.

P203] WEPL-corrected margins for moving targets in carbon-ion gated treatments: Preliminary results

Purpose To evaluate intra- and inter-fractional robustness of carbon-ion treatment plans based on water-equivalent path length (WEPL) corrected ITV margins for moving targets irradiated with gated pencil-beam scanning. Methods As a preliminary study, three patients with thoraco-abdominal targets were considered. Clinical plans were optimized with an Intensity Modulated Particle Therapy (IMPT) algorithm and the use of case-specific avoidance structures to prevent radiation pathways on regions subject to intra- and inter-fractional variations. Plans were optimized on the end-exhale CT of a 4DCT dataset using 2 fields and tested for consistency within the gating window by recalculation on the 30%-exhale and 30%-inhale CTs. Single Field Uniform Dose (SFUD) plans were optimized on beam-specific WEPL-corrected ITV ( ITV WEPL ), which comprised the envelope of water-equivalent target positions within the ideal gating window. Differently from clinical plans, avoidance structures were not used in this approach. Clinical plans were taken as reference for comparison. Dose recalculations on the planning 4DCT and on synthetic 4DCT simulating irregular breathing allowed to evaluate intra-fractional robustness of the two approaches, whereas inter-fractional robustness was estimated on re-evaluation CTs (one per patient). Differences in the conformity index CI = V 95 % / V target , target coverage D 95 % and homogeneity index HI = ( D 2 % − D 98 % )/ D 50 % between the end-exhale plan and the recalculated dose distributions were computed. Doses to the involved organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated as well. Results The CI presented slightly higher median intra-/inter-fractional variations and absolute values in the ITV WEPL approach (13%–1.47) with respect to reference plans (6%–1.36). D 95 % and HI showed lower median intra-fractional variations for the ITV WEPL approach (0.1% and 35%) compared to reference plans (3.4% and 46%). In case of inter-fractional changes, the use of ITV WEPL led to higher median variations but comparable absolute values for D 95 % (3.8% vs 2.2%) and for HI (144% vs 20%, absolute median values: 0.11 vs 0.14). The two methods performed similarly in OARs. Conclusions The use of WEPL-corrected ITV permits adequate tumor coverage even in presence of irregular breathing motion, for the small analyzed sample. Although uncertainties due only to intra-fractional organ motion were considered in the ITV WEPL approach, comparable inter-fractional robustness was found among the two strategies.

Estimation of internal organ motion-induced variance in radiation dose in non-gated radiotherapy

In the delivery of non-gated radiotherapy (RT), owing to intra-fraction organ motion, a certain degree of RT dose uncertainty is present. Herein, we propose a novel mathematical algorithm to estimate the mean and variance of RT dose that is delivered without gating. These parameters are specific to individual internal organ motion, dependent on individual treatment plans, and relevant to the RT delivery process. This algorithm uses images from a patient’s 4D simulation study to model the actual patient internal organ motion during RT delivery. All necessary dose rate calculations are performed in fixed patient internal organ motion states. The analytical and deterministic formulae of mean and variance in dose from non-gated RT were derived directly via statistical averaging of the calculated dose rate over possible random internal organ motion initial phases, and did not require constructing relevant histograms. All results are expressed in dose rate Fourier transform coefficients for computational efficiency. Exact solutions are provided to simplified, yet still clinically relevant, cases. Results from a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) patient case are also presented. The results obtained from our mathematical algorithm can aid clinical decisions by providing information regarding both mean and variance of radiation dose to non-gated patients prior to RT delivery.