Journal of Gastroenterology and HepatologyVolume 17, Issue 9 p. 1037-1038 Free Access Hepatobiliary and pancreatic: Commentary First published: 07 August 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02820.xAboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat interpretation of fig. 1 see page 1032 This sonogram shows an ill-defined gallbladder with multiple small hyperechoic objects casting an acoustic shadow. Clearly, they represent small stones in the gallbladder. The gallbladder wall is obscure. The liver parenchyma anterior to and left to the gallbladder is hypoechoic (arrows). The gallbladder seems to be compressed by the hypoechoic tissue. Judging from the shape of the gallbladder, the presence of stones, and the surrounding hypoechoic tissue, this most likely represents gallbladder carcinoma infiltrating into the liver parenchyma. The high CA19-9 level is compatible with the diagnosis. diagnosis: gallbladder carcinoma infiltrating into liver parenchyma Enhanced CT scan (Fig. 2) shows two low density lesions with peripheral enhancement (arrows). The anteriorly situated lesion contains the stone harboring gallbladder. Adenocarcinoma is usually enhanced in the periphery upon contrast injection because the periphery is more vascular and growing compared to the interior of the mass. Approximately 80% of gallbladder carcinomas are adenocarcinoma, and 75% of the patients are female.1 MRCP (Fig. 3) shows dilated intrahepatic bile ducts and occlusion of the common hepatic duct (arrow). The serum bilirubin level in this patient rose to 22.7 mg/dL in 3 weeks, and a drainage catheter was introduced percutaneously into the common bile duct for drainage. However, the catheter did not encounter much resistance and readily entered the common bile duct (Fig. 4), suggesting that this obstruction was due to external compression rather than intraductal tumor growth. The bilirubin level dropped to 12.7 mg/dL in 1 week. Figure 2Open in figure viewerPowerPoint CT scan with enhancement. Figure 3Open in figure viewerPowerPoint MRCP. The common hepatic duct is obstructed at the arrow. Figure 4Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Percutaneous drainage catheter is in place. According to a cooperative survey on surgical treatment for carcinoma of the biliary tract conducted in 3000 patients in Japan, the modes of gallbladder carcinoma spread were direct hepatic invasion in 65%, liver metastasis in 25%, bile duct invasion in 51%, portal vein invasion in 23% and lymph node metastasis in 76%.2 In Fig. 2, the posteriorly situated lesion is perhaps intrahepatic metastasis. The presence of stones in the gallbladder is an important risk factor for carcinoma; 75% of patients who develop gallbladder cancer have cholelithiasis, and patients with stones have a risk of carcinoma seven times higher than that of those without stones.3 References 1 Weeden D. Diseases of the gallbladder. In: MacSween, RNM, Anthony, PP, Scheuer, PJ, Burt, AD, Portman, BC, eds. Pathology of the Liver. London: Churchill Livingston 1994, 513 – 34. 2 Ogura YN, Ezumoto R, Isaji S et al. Radical operations for carcinoma of the gallbladder: Recent status in Japan. World Jurg 1991; 15: 337 – 47. 3 Bengmark S, Jeppsson B. Tumors of the Gallbladder. In: Haubrich, W, Schaffner, F, Berk, JE, eds. Bockus Gastroenterology. Philadelphia: Saunders 1995, 2739 – 44. Volume17, Issue9September 2002Pages 1037-1038 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation
Read full abstract