Intracranial Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Abstract PO5-20-02: Secondary BRain metastases prevention after Isolated intracranial progression on trastuzumab/pertuzumab or T-DM1 in pts with aDvanced human epidermal Growth factor receptor 2+ brEast cancer with addition of Tucatinib (BRIDGET)

Abstract Background: Despite treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy, up to half of patients with HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) will develop brain metastases (BrM). First-line therapy for advanced HER2+ MBC remains a taxane, trastuzumab, pertuzumab (TP) which demonstrates poor brain permeability. Isolated brain relapse with stable or absent extracranial disease remains a clinical problem in both the adjuvant (Untch et al., ESMO 2019 Congress) and metastatic settings (Noteware et al., Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023). Current guidelines recommend continuing current systemic therapy in the setting of first isolated brain relapse following local therapy. Tucatinib, a brain-penetrable HER2-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor, when added to trastuzumab and capecitabine improves intracranial progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stable or active HER2+ BrMs. We hypothesize that adding tucatinib to TP or T-DM1 in patients with HER2+ MBC with isolated brain relapse or progression could delay or prevent the development of further intracranial lesions and improve OS. Methods: BRIDGET (NCT05323955) is a single arm, phase II, multicenter study of tucatinib added to TP or T-DM1 after local therapy in patients with isolated brain relapse or progression. A total of 48 patients at 9 U.S. sites as part of the Hoosier Cancer Research Network (HCRN) with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer will be enrolled after 1st or 2nd BrM relapse or progression within 8 weeks of local therapy. Patients must currently be receiving standard of care treatment with TP or T-DM1 in the metastatic setting, or adjuvant trastuzumab-based or T-DM1 therapy with isolated brain recurrence. Extracranial disease must be stable per RECISTv1.1 or absent. Patients may not have leptomeningeal disease or untreated brain lesions over 5 mm. Patients will receive continuous tucatinib added to their current therapy (TP or T-DM1). The primary objective is intracranial PFS compared to a historical control (H0: PFS < 5 months (mos), HA: PFS > 8 mos) of the HER2CLIMB clinical trial where patients could continue on trial with isolated brain progression. In these patients, median time from brain progression to second progression or death was 7.6 mos (95% CI, 3.9 to 11.3 mos) in the tucatinib arm versus 3.1 mos (95% CI, 1.2 to 4.1 mos) in the control arm (Lin et al., J Clin Onc 2020). Secondary endpoints include PFS by RECISTv1.1, PFS of extracranial disease, locally treated versus new distant intracranial metastasis PFS, site of first progression (brain versus non-brain), OS, and toxicity in patients with BrM. Collection of correlative specimens including archival tissue, cerebrospinal fluid (optional), whole blood for ctDNA are planned. Patient-reported outcomes surveyed utilizing the FACT-BR and FACIT-Fatigue questionnaires are also included for future analyses. As of 7/06/23, accrual is 5 patients of the anticipated 48 patients overall, across 5 sites (Duke University, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Ohio State University, Providence Portland Medical Center, and Washington University in St. Louis) currently open. An additional 4 sites are pending opening. Those interested in this trial can reach out to the study Principal Investigators, Carey Anders, MD (carey.anders@duke.edu) or Sarah Sammons, MD (sarahl_sammons@dfci.harvard.edu). Citation Format: Sarah Sammons, Amanda Van Swearingen, Laura Noteware, Nusayba Bagegni, Kelly Moulton, Stevie Threatt, Denise Jaggers, Shannon Shea, Eric Lipp, Erin Riley, Sin-Ho Jung, Gloria Broadwater, Masey Ross, Kimberly Strickland, Sasha Beyer, Alison Conlin, Aki Morikawa, Rashmi Murthy, Carey Anders. Secondary BRain metastases prevention after Isolated intracranial progression on trastuzumab/pertuzumab or T-DM1 in pts with aDvanced human epidermal Growth factor receptor 2+ brEast cancer with addition of Tucatinib (BRIDGET) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-20-02.

Abstract PO5-16-10: The efficacy of novel antibody-drug-conjugates on brain metastases in metastatic breast cancer patients – a multicenter real-world analysis

Abstract 15 – 30% of all patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) develop brain metastases (BMs). Treatment of BMs include radiation therapy and surgical resection while systemic treatment is challenging and prospective evidence for the treatment of active brain metastases is restricted to the small molecule Tucatinib. Recently, the antibody-drug-conjugates (ADCs) Sacituzumab-Govitecan (SG) and Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-DXd) have shown to be highly effective in the treatment of triple-negative (SG), HER2-positive (T-DXd) and HR+/HER2- (SG and, in case of HER2-low-expression, T-DxD) MBC. However, there is only limited data, whether these macromolecules are also effective in patients with BMs. We therefore aimed to examine the efficacy of SG and T-DXd in patients with stable and active BMs in a multicenter real-world analysis. Female patients with stable or active BMs who were treated with either SG or T-DXd at the breast centers of Tuebingen University, Ulm University or Freiburg University in Germany before June 30, 2023 were included into this analysis. Data cut-off for this analysis was July 10, 2023. BMs were classified as active if they were newly diagnosed and did not require local treatment or if they were progressing and did not require local treatment. Preexisting BMs without intracranial disease progression or preexisting/newly diagnosed BMs that had been treated by surgery and/or radiotherapy directly prior to SG/T-DXd therapy were considered as stable. All patients underwent baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and received follow-up MRIs at least every three months. Growth dynamics of BMs were assessed by board certified neuroradiologists. Intracranial disease control rate (icDCR) was defined as the percentage of patients with at least intracranial stable disease at the first follow-up MRI. Intracranial progression-free survival (icPFS) was determined as the period between the first application of SG or T-DXd and intracranial disease progression or treatment cessation due to the patients’ will or the onset of intolerable toxicity. If ADC treatment was discontinued due to extracranial disease progression albeit at least stable intracranial disease patients were censored. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period between the first application of SG or T-DXd and death. In total, 26 patients were included with a median of two prior therapy lines in the metastatic setting (range 2 – 15). 10 (38%) and 14 (54%) patients received SG and T-DXd, respectively. 2/26 (8%) patients receiving SG were consecutively subjected to T-DXd treatment. SG was applied to 12/12 patients (100%) due to triple-negative MBC and 12/16 patients (75%) treated with T-DXd were HER2-positive. The remaining 4/16 patients (25%) treated with T-DXd showed HER2 low tumor biology. 5/12 (42%) and 8/16 (50%) patients treated with SG or T-DXd had active BMs at treatment initiation. The icDCR was 33% (95% CI: 5% - 61%)/81% (95% CI: 62% - 100%) for all patients treated with SG/T-DXd and 40% (95% CI: 0% - 88%)/75% (95% CI: 43% - 100%) in case of active BMs. After a median follow-up of 7.2 months, 10/12 (83.3%) patients treated with SG and 4/16 (25%) patients subjected to T-DXd had discontinued treatment. Median icPFS was 3.1 months (95% CI: 0.4 – 5.8 months) for SG and not reached for T-DXd. 7/12 (58%) patients treated with SG and 4/16 patients (25%) treated with T-DXd died until data cut-off. Median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI: 3.0 – 11.4 months) for patients treated with SG and not reached for patients treated with T-DXd. SG and T-DXd showed promising clinical activity in both, stable and active cerebral breast cancer metastasis. Updated PFS and OS data will be reported at the meeting. Citation Format: Dominik Dannehl, Henning Schäffler, Tobias Engler, Lea Volmer, Arne Estler, Ilinca Popp, Stefanie Lorenz, Eva-Maria Grischke, Markus Hahn, Ghazaleh Tabatabai, Ingolf Juhasz-Böss, Wolfgang Janni, Sara Brucker, Florin-Andrei Taran, Andreas Hartkopf. The efficacy of novel antibody-drug-conjugates on brain metastases in metastatic breast cancer patients – a multicenter real-world analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-16-10.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis from cholangiocarcinoma.

Accounting for approximately 15% of primary liver cancers and 3% of gastrointestinal malignancies, cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) poses a serious health concern given its high mortality rate. Managing brain metastases (BMs) from CCA is challenging because of their rarity and poor prognosis, with little guidance on treatment from the literature. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in managing BMs from CCA. This multicenter retrospective study included 13 CCA patients with 41 BMs treated with SRS from October 2006 to April 2022 at eight institutions affiliated with the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Inclusion criteria were a CCA diagnosis, an age over 18 years, no other malignancies, single-fraction SRS treatment for BMs, and at least one follow-up image. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes were collected. The primary endpoints were local control (LC), intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was the development of adverse radiation effects (AREs). The median radiological follow-up was 5 months (range 1-18 months). At the last follow-up, LC was achieved in 39 (95.1%) of 41 BMs. New distant metastases were observed in 3 patients (23.1%), and the mean intracranial PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI 6.5-12.3 months). Six-month and 1-year OS rates were 38.5% and 11.5%, respectively, and the median OS was 6 months (95% CI 4.9-7.2 months). Concurrent immunotherapy was associated with a high risk of local failure (HR 29.665, 95% CI 1.799-489.206, p = 0.018), and the absence of systemic chemotherapy before SRS was linked to reduced OS (HR 6.658, 95% CI 1.173-37.776, p = 0.032). Regarding AREs, only 1 patient (7.7%) experienced right hemiparesis and was treated with corticosteroid therapy. SRS is an effective option for managing BMs in CCA patients, showing promise in LC and a high safety profile.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a prospective study using the NeuroPoint Alliance Stereotactic Radiosurgery Registry.

The literature on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs) managed using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) relies mainly on single-institution studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There is a literature gap on clinical and radiological outcomes of SRS for NSCLC metastases in real-world practice. The objective of this study was to benchmark mortality and progression outcomes in patients undergoing SRS for NSCLC BMs and identify risk factors for these outcomes using a national quality registry. The SRS Registry of the NeuroPoint Alliance was used for this study. This registry included patients from 16 enrolling sites who underwent SRS from 2017 to 2022. Data are prospectively collected without a prespecified research purpose. The main outcomes of this analysis were overall survival (OS), out-of-field recurrence, local progression, and intracranial progression. All time-to-event investigations included Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regressions. Two hundred sixty-four patients were identified, with a mean age of 66.7 years and a female proportion of 48.5%. Most patients (84.5%) had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 80-100, and the mean baseline EQ-5D score was 0.539 quality-adjusted life years. A single lesion was present in 53.4% of the patients, and 29.1% of patients had 3 or more lesions. The median OS was 28.1 months, and independent predictors of mortality included no control of primary tumor (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1), KPS of 80 (HR 2.4) or lower (HR 2.4), coronary artery disease (HR 2.8), and 5 or more lesions present at the time of SRS treatment (HR 2.3). The median out-of-field progression-free survival (PFS) was 24.8 months, and the median local PFS was unreached. Intralesional hemorrhage was an independent risk factor of local progression, with an HR of 6.0. The median intracranial PFS was 14.0 months and was predicted by the number of lesions at the time of SRS (3-4 lesions, HR 2.2; 5-14 lesions, HR 2.5). In this real-world prospective study, the authors used a national quality registry and found favorable OS in patients with NSCLC BMs undergoing SRS compared with results from previously published RCTs. The intracranial PFS was mainly driven by the emergence of new lesions rather than local progression. A greater number of lesions at baseline was associated with out-of-field progression, while intralesional hemorrhage at baseline was associated with local progression.

Stereotactic radiotherapy vs whole brain radiation therapy in EGFR mutated NSCLC: Results & reflections from the prematurely closed phase III HYBRID trial

BackgroundAll known randomized trials of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) versus whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs) comprise mixed histologies. The phase III HYBRID trial (NCT02882984) attempted to evaluate non-inferiority of SRT vs. WBRT specifically for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRm NSCLC) BMs. MethodsInclusion criteria were ≤ 5 BMs (any size) from treatment-naïve EGFRm NSCLC. All patients started a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor on the first day of WBRT (37.5 Gy/15 fractions) or SRT (25–40 Gy/5 fractions per tumor volume). The primary endpoint was 18-month intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS; intention-to-treat). ResultsThe trial commenced in June 2015 and was closed in April 2021 after screening 208 patients but enrolling 85 (n = 41 WBRT, n = 44 SRT; median follow-up 31 and 36 months, respectively). Respectively, 9.5 % vs. 10.2 % of patients experienced intracranial progression at 18 months, and median iPFS was 21.4 vs. 22.3 months (p > 0.05 for all). The SRT arm experienced higher overall survival and cognitive preservation (p < 0.05 for all). The most notable reason for low enrollment was patients not wishing to risk neurocognitive decline from WBRT. ConclusionsAlthough this phase III trial was underpowered, there was no evidence that SRT yielded outcome detriments compared to WBRT for EGFRm NSCLC BMs. Lessons from prematurely closed trials are valuable, as they often provide important experiential perspectives for investigators designing/executing future trials. In the current era, randomized trials involving WBRT without cognitive sparing measures may be at high risk of underaccrual; however, trials of molecular-/biologically-stratified patients are highly recommended as “individualized medicine/oncology” continues to expand.

Development and validation of an MRI-Based nomogram to predict the effectiveness of immunotherapy for brain metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

The variability and unpredictability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating brain metastases (BMs) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the main concern. We assessed the utility of novel imaging biomarkers (radiomics) for discerning patients with NSCLC and BMs who would derive advantages from ICIs treatment. Data clinical outcomes and pretreatment magnetic resonance images (MRI) were collected on patients with NSCLC with BMs treated with ICIs between June 2019 and June 2022 and divided into training and test sets. Metastatic brain lesions were contoured using ITK-SNAP software, and 3748 radiomic features capturing both intra- and peritumoral texture patterns were extracted. A clinical radiomic nomogram (CRN) was built to evaluate intracranial progression-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The prognostic value of the CRN was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests. In the study, a total of 174 patients were included, and 122 and 52 were allocated to the training and validation sets correspondingly. The intratumoral radiomic signature, peritumoral radiomic signature, clinical signature, and CRN predicted intracranial objective response rate. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed a significantly longer intracranial progression-free survival in the low-CRN group than in the high-CRN group (p < 0.001). The CRN was also significantly associated with progression-free survival (p < 0.001) but not overall survival. Radiomics biomarkers from pretreatment MRI images were predictive of intracranial response. Pretreatment radiomics may allow the early prediction of benefits.

Immunotherapy combined with cranial radiotherapy for driver-negative non-small-cell lung cancer brain metastases: a retrospective study.

Background: This study assesses immune checkpoint inhibitors' efficacy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) and explores the role of cranial radiation therapy (CRT) in the immunotherapy era. Methods: The retrospective analysis screened NSCLC patients with BMs from July 2018 to December 2021. Treatment involved chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors as the first-line, with patients divided into CRT and non-CRT groups. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and intracranial progression-free survival were calculated and compared. Results: Among 113 patients, 74 who received CRT had significantly better median OS (not reached vs 15.31months), particularly among those with one to three BMs. Factors correlating with better OS included CRT, PD-L1 expression and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment scores. Conclusion: Integrating CRT with anti-PD-1 therapy notably enhanced long-term survival in NSCLC patients with BMs.

PD-L1 inhibitors combined with whole brain radiotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer brain metastases: Real-world evidence.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that brain metastases patients may benefit from intracranial radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, it is unclear whether this treatment is effective for patients with small cell lung cancer brain metastases (SCLC-BMs). We conducted a retrospective study by analyzing medical records of patients with SCLC-BMs from January 1, 2017 to June 1, 2022. Data related to median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were analyzed. A total of 109 patients were enrolled, of which 60 received WBRT and 49 received WBRT-ICI. Compared to the WBRT alone cohort, the WBRT-ICI cohort showed longer mOS (20.4 months vs. 29.3 months, p = 0.021), mPFS (7.9 months vs. 15.1 months, p < 0.001), and iPFS (8.3 months vs. 16.5 months, p < 0.001). Furthermore, WBRT-ICI cohort had a better response rate for both BMs. (p = 0.035) and extracranial diseases (p < 0.001) compared to those receiving WBRT alone. Notably, the use of WBRT before ICI was associated with longer mOS compared to the use of WBRT after ICI (23.3 months for the ICI-WBRT group vs. 34.8 months for the WBRT-ICI group, p = 0.020). Our results indicated that WBRT combined with immunotherapy improved survival in SCLC-BMs patients compared to WBRT monotherapy. Administering WBRT prior to ICI treatment is associated with improved survival outcomes compared to WBRT following ICI treatment, for patients with SCLC-BMs. These findings highlight the significance of conducting further prospective researches on combination strategies of intracranial radiotherapy and ICI in SCLC-BMs patients.

A Population-Based Analysis of Brain Metastasis Burden and Management in 8705 Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION: Patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have historically been characterised by poor overall survival (OS) and high risk for intracranial metastatic disease (IMD), but large-scale real-world evidence on clinical presentation and treatment in this population is lacking. These patients traditionally receive whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for IMD, however, a recent systematic review has indicated that OS following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may be non-inferior compared with WBRT. METHODS: We included all patients diagnosed with SCLC between April 2007 and March 2018 identified through a provincial health administrative database. Information on patient and treatment characteristics, incidence and time to IMD, and OS from time of SCLC diagnosis were collected and analyzed using R. RESULTS: A total of 8705 patients were included. Median age was 68 years (range 18-103). Most patients presented with extensive disease (n = 5625) and were diagnosed after 2011 (n = 5768). Patients who received chemotherapy (n = 5563) had significantly longer OS than those who did not (median 10.64 vs 1.58 mo, HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.34-0.37). 6662 patients received brain imaging at the time of primary diagnosis (CT: 5126, MRI: 1536), and 88% of patients surviving longer than 6 mo received more than one follow-up brain scan. 31% developed IMD (synchronous: 1175, asynchronous: 1511) with median intracranial progression-free survival of 5.65 mo. Median OS of patients with IMD was 9.76 mo, 29 and 1300 received SRS and WBRT as first treatment for their IMD, respectively. OS was in favour of SRS over WBRT (median 20.47 vs 8.74 mo, HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.84), which remained significant in multivariate analysis (p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OS for patients with SCLC remains poor and many patients present with IMD. Some patients with SCLC may benefit from SRS treatment.

Efficacy and survival outcomes of alectinib vs. crizotinib in ALK‑positive NSCLC patients with CNS metastases: A retrospective study.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have transformed the treatment paradigm for patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet the differential efficacy between alectinib and crizotinib in treating patients with NSCLC and central nervous system (CNS) metastases has been insufficiently studied. A retrospective analysis was conducted of clinical outcomes of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and CNS metastases treated at the Shandong Cancer Centre. Based on their initial ALK-TKI treatment, patients were categorised into either the crizotinib group or the alectinib group. Efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. A total of 46 eligible patients were enrolled in the present study: 33 patients received crizotinib and 13 patients received alectinib. The median OS of the entire group was 66.8 months (95% CI: 48.5-85.1). Compared with the patients in the crizotinib group, the patients in the alectinib group showed a significant improvement in both median (m)PFS (27.5 vs. 9.5 months; P=0.003) and intracranial mPFS (36.0 vs. 10.8 months; P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the alectinib and crizotinib groups (not reached vs. 58.7 months; P=0.149). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between patients receiving TKI combined with radiotherapy (RT) vs. TKI alone with respect to mPFS (11.0 vs. 11.7 months, P=0.863) as well as intracranial mPFS (12.5 vs. 16.9 months, P=0.721). In the present study, alectinib exhibited superior efficacy to crizotinib for treating patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and CNS metastases, especially in terms of delaying disease progression and preventing CNS recurrence. Moreover, the results demonstrated that it might be beneficial to delay local RT for patients with ALK-positive NSCL and CNS metastases.

Clinical characteristics and MRI based radiomics nomograms can predict iPFS and short-term efficacy of third-generation EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastases

BackgroundPredicting short-term efficacy and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) in epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutated (EGFR-mutated) lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases who receive third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy was of great significance for individualized treatment. We aimed to construct and validate nomograms based on clinical characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics for predicting short-term efficacy and intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) of third-generation EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases.MethodsOne hundred ninety-four EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases who received third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment were included in this study from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2023. Patients were randomly divided into training cohort and validation cohort in a ratio of 5:3. Radiomics features extracted from brain MRI were screened by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to screen clinical risk factors. Single clinical (C), single radiomics (R), and combined (C + R) nomograms were constructed in short-term efficacy predicting model and iPFS predicting model, respectively. Prediction effectiveness of nomograms were evaluated by calibration curves, Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the iPFS of high and low iPFS rad-score patients in the predictive iPFS R model and to compare the iPFS of high-risk and low-risk patients in the predictive iPFS C + R model.ResultsOverall response rate (ORR) was 71.1%, disease control rate (DCR) was 91.8% and median iPFS was 12.67 months (7.88–20.26, interquartile range [IQR]). There were significant differences in iPFS between patients with high and low iPFS rad-scores, as well as between high-risk and low-risk patients. In short-term efficacy model, the C-indexes of C + R nomograms in training cohort and validation cohort were 0.867 (0.835-0.900, 95%CI) and 0.803 (0.753–0.854, 95%CI), while in iPFS model, the C-indexes were 0.901 (0.874–0.929, 95%CI) and 0.753 (0.713–0.793, 95%CI).ConclusionsThe third-generation EGFR-TKI showed significant efficacy in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases, and the combined line plot of C + R can be utilized to predict short-term efficacy and iPFS.

Efficacy of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery in treating surgical beds of metastatic brain tumors

ObjectiveSurgery alone for metastatic brain tumors (METs) often results in local recurrence due to microscopic residual tumor tissue. While stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is commonly used post-surgery, hypofractionation may be required for large surgical beds. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery (hf-GKRS) for the first time as a post-operative adjuvant therapy. MethodsThis retrospective study involved 24 patients (28 surgical beds) who underwent hf-GKRS within four weeks after surgery. The study primarily focused on local control (LC) rate and analyzed distant intracranial failure (DICF), intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), leptomeningeal disease (LMD), overall survival (OS), and radiation necrosis (RN). ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 9 months, LC was achieved in 89.3 % of surgical beds. LC estimates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 96.4 %, 82.7 %, and 82.7 %, respectively. DICF was observed in 45.8 % of patients, and LMD was identified in two patients (8.3 %). At the end of the follow-up, 58.3 % of patients were alive, and the median OS was 20 months. RN occurred in only one surgical bed (3.6 %). No grade 5 toxicity was observed. The univariate analysis identified a longer interval to GKRS (HR 11.842, p = 0.042) and a larger treatment volume (HR 1.103, p = 0.037) as significant factors for local failure. Conclusionshf-GKRS shows potential as an effective and safe adjuvant treatment for surgical beds. It offers an alternative to SRS, SRT, or WBRT, particularly for larger volumes or tumors near critical structures. Further research is needed to confirm these results and optimize treatment approaches.

Using MRI radiomics to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy for brain metastasis in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Brain metastases (BMs) are common in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in these patients is uncertain. In this study we aimed to develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for intracranial efficacy prediction of ICIs in patients with BMs from SCLC. The training and validation cohorts consisted of 101 patients from two centers. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), logistic univariate regression analysis, and random forest were applied to select the radiomic features, generating the radiomics score (Rad-score) through the formula. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, a nomogram was created by the combined model. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were used to assess the performance of the nomogram. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted based on the nomogram scores. Ten radiomic features were selected for calculating the Rad-score as they could differentiate the intracranial efficacy in the training (area under the curve [AUC], 0.759) and the validation cohort (AUC, 0.667). A nomogram was created by combining Rad-score, treatment lines, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The training cohort obtained an AUC of 0.878 for the combined model, verified in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.875). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed the nomogram was associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.0152) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) (p = 0.0052) but not overall survival (OS) (p = 0.4894). A radiomics nomogram model for predicting the intracranial efficacy of ICIs in SCLC patients with BMs can provide suggestions for exploring individual-based treatments for patients.

Optimal sequence of LT for symptomatic BM in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a comparative study of first-line EGFR-TKIs with/without upfront LT

BackgroundThe third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) can penetrate blood–brain barrier and are effective for brain metastases (BMs). There is no consensus on the optimal sequence of local therapy (LT) and EGFR-TKIs for symptomatic BM patients because patients suffering neurological symptoms were not enrolled in most clinical trials.MethodsNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation (EGFRm) and symptomatic BM receiving first-line osimertinib and aumolertinib from two medical centers were collected. All participants were allocated into the third-generation EGFR-TKIs (TKIs) group and the upfront LT (uLT) plus third-generation EGFR-TKIs (TKIs + uLT) group. Demographic data, survival outcomes, treatment failure patterns, and adverse events were evaluated between the two groups. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the impact of BM number on survival outcomes.Results86 patients were enrolled, 44 in the TKIs group and 42 in the TKIs + uLT group. There were no significant differences in the short-term response between the groups. TKIs + uLT was associated with significantly longer overall survival (OS) (43 vs. 28 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17–0.77; p = .011). No differences in progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (iPFS), failure patterns, or safety were observed. In subgroup analyses of oligo-BM patients, TKIs + uLT could prolong OS (43 vs. 31 months; HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05–0.92; p = .015).ConclusionsEGFRm NSCLC patients with symptomatic BM might benefit from uLT, particularly oligo-BM patients. However, larger prospective cohort studies should be carried out to confirm the responses of the TKIs + uLT scheme.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy or anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitor for advanced small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.

Anlotinib, as a salvage treatment for patients after failure of third-line or later-line treatments for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), has shown efficacy in patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, the efficacy and safety of anlotinib alone or in combination with immunotherapy for SCLC with BMs remain unclear. Patients treated with anlotinib alone or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between April 2019 and February 2023 were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe the progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS (iPFS). A waterfall diagram was used to indicate changes in intracranial lesions. A total of 48 patients were included; 29 received anlotinib alone, and 19 were administered anlotinib plus ICI. Combination therapy, compared with anlotinib, was associated with significantly longer PFS and iPFS (PFS: 8.1months vs. 2.5months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 8.1months vs. 2.5months, P = 0.004). Similar results were observed in patients with multiple BMs (PFS: 8.1months vs. 1.9months, P = 0.001; iPFS: 8.1months vs. 1.9months, P = 0.002). After third-line or later-line treatments, patients treated with ICI plus anlotinib also achieved significant PFS and iPFS benefits (PFS: 8.4months vs. 2.1months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 9.2months vs. 2.1months, P = 0.002). No new or severe adverse events were observed with combination therapy. The combination of anlotinib and ICI has promising intracranial and extracranial efficacy with tolerable toxicity, and may be a therapeutic option for SCLC patients with BMs.

Predictive role of intracranial PD-L1 expression in a real-world cohort of NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibition following brain metastasis resection

BackgroundEmerging evidence suggests that treatment of NSCLC brain metastases with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is associated with response rates similar to those of extracranial disease. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) serves as a predictive biomarker for ICI response. However, the predictive value of brain metastasis-specific (intracranial) PD-L1 TPS is not established. We investigated the role of intra- and extracranial PD-L1 TPS in NSCLC patients treated with ICI following brain metastasis resection.MethodsClinical data from NSCLC patients treated with ICI following brain metastasis resection (n = 64) were analyzed. PD-L1 TPS of brain metastases (n = 64) and available matched extracranial tumor tissue (n = 44) were assessed via immunohistochemistry. Statistical analyses included cut point estimation via maximally selected rank statistics, Kaplan–Meier estimates, and multivariable Cox regression analysis for intracranial progression-free survival (icPFS), extracranial progression-free survival (ecPFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsPD-L1 expression was found in 54.7% of brain metastases and 68.2% of extracranial tumor tissues, with a median intra- and extracranial PD-L1 TPS of 7.5% (0 – 50%, IQR) and 15.0% (0 – 80%, IQR), respectively. In matched tissue samples, extracranial PD-L1 TPS was significantly higher than intracranial PD-L1 TPS (p = 0.013). Optimal cut points for intracranial and extracranial PD-L1 TPS varied according to outcome parameter assessed. Notably, patients with a high intracranial PD-L1 TPS (> 40%) exhibited significantly longer icPFS as compared to patients with a low intracranial PD-L1 TPS (≤ 40%). The cut point of 40% for intracranial PD-L1 TPS was independently associated with OS, icPFS and ecPFS in multivariable analyses.ConclusionOur study highlights the potential role of intracranial PD-L1 TPS in NSCLC, which could be used to predict ICI response in cases where extracranial tissue is not available for PD-L1 assessment as well as to specifically predict intracranial response.

Identifying optimal ALK inhibitors in first- and second-line treatment of patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy, safety and effects on quality of life of different ALK-inhibitors for global and Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsThe included RCTs were identified through a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov, and major cancer conferences. The assessment of progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS, overall survival (OS), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was carried out using restricted mean survival time (RMST) model, fractional polynomial model and Royston-Parmar model. Time-invariant hazard ratio (HR) models were also used to validate and supplement the primary analysis. Objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events with any grade, grade 3–5 were assessed through a Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary measures for OS, PFS, and PROs were HR and RMST. The odds ratio was the metric for evaluating safety, ORR, 12-month PFS rate, 24-month OS rate, and the 12-month non-deterioration rate of PROs. Subgroup analyses based on patient characteristics were performed.ResultsA total of fourteen studies (ten for first-line, four for second-line) consisting of nine treatments (chemotherapy, crizotinib, alectinib [600mg BID], low-dose alectinib [300mg BID], brigatinib, ceritinib, ensartinib, envonalkib, and lorlatinib) were included. In the first-line setting, alectinib showed a significant advantage over crizotinib and had the longest OS among all ALK-inhibitors. Compared to crizotinib, lorlatinib had the best efficacy regarding PFS for global patients, followed closely by alectinib and brigatinib. For Asian patients, alectinib significantly improved PFS compared to other treatments. In second-line, alectinib had the highest PFS for patients pretreated with crizotinib, followed by brigatinib, ceritinib and chemotherapy. Alectinib, irrespective of the dose, was the safest first-line option, whereas lorlatinib, brigatinib, and ceritinib showed poorer safety profiles. Alectinib was also the safest ALK-inhibitor for crizotinib-resistant patients. Brigatinib had the best performance in terms of PROs.ConclusionsConsidering both efficacy and safety, alectinib appears to be the preferable treatment in first-line and second-line, particularly for Asian patients.

Analysis of the efficacy of upfront brain radiotherapy versus deferred radiotherapy for EGFR/ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a retrospective study

BackgroundFor brain metastases (BMs) from EGFR/ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the best time to administer tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and brain radiotherapy (RT) has not been identified. This analysis was an attempt to solve this problem in part.MethodsA total of 163 patients with EGFR/ALK-positive NSCLC and brain metastasis (BM) who were diagnosed between January 2017 and July 2022 were included in this study. Ninety-one patients underwent upfront RT, and 72 patients received deferred RT. Comparing the clinical efficacy and safety in these two patient cohorts was the main goal of the study.ResultsThe average follow-up period was 20.5 months (range 2.0 to 91.9 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 26.5 months, and the median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) was 23.6 months. Upfront RT considerably increased the iPFS (26.9 vs. 20.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 5.408, P = 0.020) and OS (31.2 vs. 22.3 months, HR = 4.667, P = 0.031) compared to deferred RT. According to multivariate analysis, upfront RT was an independent risk factor for predicting iPFS (HR = 1.670, P = 0.021). Upfront RT (HR = 1.531, P = 0.044), TKI therapy (HR = 0.423, P < 0.001), and oligometastases (HR = 2.052, P = 0.021) were found to be independent risk factors for OS.ConclusionThis study showed that upfront RT combined with TKI treatment can significantly improve intracranial disease management and prolong survival in patients with EGFR/ALK mutations in BMs from NSCLC.

The efficacy of upfront craniocerebral radiotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.

This is a retrospective study that involved 213 patients with EGFR-NSCLC and BMs, with the patients divided into two groups: the upfront cranial RT (ucRT) group (n = 96) and the non-ucRT group (n = 117). All patients were administered with osimertinib, and those in the ucRT group also underwent RT. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS (IPFS) of the two groups were compared. The ucRT group manifested a markedly higher IPFS than the non-ucRT group (29.65 months vs 21.8 months; P < 0.0001). The subgroup analysis revealed that patients with oligometastases (OLOGO-BMs; 1-3 BMs) demonstrated a notably longer OS (44.5 months vs 37.3 months; P < 0.0001), PFS (32.3 months vs 20.8 months; P = 0.6884) and IPFS (37.8 months vs 22.1 months; P < 0.0001) in the ucRT group than in the non-ucRT group. However, for patients with multiple BMs, there was no significant difference in OS (27.3 months vs 34.4 months; P = 0.0710) and PFS (13.7 months vs 13.2 months; P = 0.0516) between the ucRT group and the non-ucRT group; the ucRT group exhibited a higher IPFS (26.4 months vs 21.35 months; P = 0.0028). Cox's multivariate analysis of patients with OLOGO-BM indicated that the use of ucRT was linked to a better OS (heart rate [HR] = 0.392; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.178-0.863; P = 0.020) and PFS (HR = 0.558; 95% CI: 0.316-0.986; P = 0.044). Upfront cerebral cranial stereotactic radiosurgery can improve outcomes in EGFR-positive patients with NSCLC and OLOGO-BM. However, for patients with multiple BMs, the preferable strategy may be pre-treatment with EGFR-TKIs.

Exploration of radiotherapy strategy for brain metastasis patients with driver gene positivity in lung cancer.

Objective: To assess the disparities in effectiveness and identify outcome predictors in the treatment of a targeted-first and radiotherapy-first regimen with driver gene-positive lung cancer brain metastases. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients with driver gene-positive lung cancer brain metastases who received first-targeted and first-radiotherapy regimens, respectively, with SIB-WBRT (whole brain tissue 40 Gy/20 fractions, tumor tissue boosted to 56-60 Gy/20 fractions) and local irradiation (prescription dose range of 20-60 Gy/2-25 fractions, most commonly delivered as 30 Gy/5 fractions, with a BED range of 28-100.8 Gy) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from September 2015 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was intracranial progression free survival (iPFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), intracranial new lesions, and tumor control. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to depict and estimate iPFS, OS, intracranial new lesions and tumor control. The Cox regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between relevant factors and outcomes. Results: 88 patients were enrolled in targeted-first and radiotherapy-first regimen, totally. And no difference was found in the comparison of iPFS between the two groups (HR=1.180, 95%CI: 0.622-2.237, P=0.613). No difference was found in the comparison of OS between the two groups (HR=1.208, 95%CI: 0.679-2.150, P=0.520). No difference was found in the comparison of intracranial new lesions between the two groups (HR=1.184, 95%CI: 0.569-2.463, P=0.652). There was a difference in the local control time between the two groups, with radiotherapy-first regimen being superior (HR=2.397, 95% CI:1.453-3.954, P<0.001). Patient age (HR=1.054, 95%CI: 1.026- 1.082, P<0.001), radiotherapy modality (HR=0.128, 95%CI: 0.041-0.401, P<0.001), metastasis volume (HR=1.426, 95%CI: 1.209-1.682, P<0.001), number of metastases(HR=14.960, 95%CI: 1.990-112.444, P=0.009), extracranial disease status (HR=0.387, 95%CI: 0.170-0.880, P=0.023) and therapy sequence (HR=13.800, 95%CI: 4.455-42.751, P<0.001) were associated with local control. Conclusion: Targeted-first regimen was not found to improve patients' iPFS relative to radiotherapy-first regimen in patients with brain metastases. Radiotherapy-first regimen for brain metastases demonstrated superior local control compared to targeted-first regimen. Patient's age, radiotherapy modality, metastasis volume, number of metastases, extracranial disease status and therapy sequence may be related to local control of metastases.