Rate Of Intracranial Hemorrhage Research Articles

Rescue Stenting after Unsuccessful Recanalization of Endovascular Thrombectomy of the Posterior Circulation: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Background The role of rescue stenting (RS) in acute ischemic strokes due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease–related large vessel occlusion is an area of active investigation. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of RS under these circumstances. Methods A systematic literature review, conforming to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines, was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and OVID databases. Common and random effects analyses were conducted to compare outcomes including modified Rankin Scale score, 90‐day mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between patients receiving and those not receiving RS after failed endovascular thrombectomy within posterior circulation. Results Ten studies comprising 1202 patients (730 RS, 472 control) were analyzed. RS was associated with a statistically significant improvement in functional outcomes, evidenced by a higher proportion of patients achieving modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at 90 days (32.74% versus 21.19% in controls; P <0.001). Additionally, RS showed a significant reduction in 90‐day mortality (33.28% versus 54.66% in controls; P <0.001) and a lower incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.74% versus 9.49% in controls; P <0.001). Conclusion RS for acute ischemic stroke in the context of intracranial atherosclerotic diseaserelated posterior circulation large vessel occlusion after failed endovascular thrombectomy is associated with improved functional outcomes, reduced mortality, and decreased symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates. These findings suggest RS as a beneficial intervention in this patient population. However, the retrospective nature of the included studies and their heterogeneity underline the need for further research, particularly through randomized controlled trials.

Endovascular thrombectomy beyond 24 hours from last known well: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BackgroundDifferent studies have demonstrated the benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) up to 24 hours after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) onset. Recent cohort observational studies suggest that patients with large vessel...

Endovascular Versus Medical Management in Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke: The DUSK Study.

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is part of the usual care for proximal vessel occlusion strokes. However, the safety and effectiveness of EVT for distal medium vessel occlusions remain unclear. We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of EVT to medical management (MM) for isolated distal medium vessel occlusions. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from seven comprehensive stroke centers. Patients were included if they had isolated distal medium vessel occlusion strokes due to middle cerebral artery M3/M4, anterior cerebral artery A2/A3, or posterior cerebral artery P1/P2 segments. Patients treated with EVT or MM were compared with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary outcome was the shift in the degree of disability as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included 90-day good (mRS score, 0-2) and excellent (mRS score, 0-1) outcomes. Safety measures included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. A total of 321 patients were included in the analysis (EVT, 179; MM, 142; 40.8% treated with intravenous thrombolysis). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting model, there were no significant differences between EVT and MM in terms of the overall degree of disability (mRS ordinal shift; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.25 [95% CI, 0.95-1.64]; P=0.110), rates of good (mRS score, 0-2; aOR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.97-1.80]; P=0.075) and excellent (aOR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.94-1.85]; P=0.098) outcomes, or mortality (aOR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.78-1.85]; P=0.395) at 90 days. The multivariable regression model showed similar findings. Moreover, there was no difference between EVT and MM in rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the multivariable regression model (aOR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.21-1.58]; P=0.277), but the inverse probability of treatment weighting model showed a lower likelihood of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.85]; P=0.013) in the EVT group. This multicenter study failed to demonstrate any significant outcome differences among patients with isolated distal medium vessel occlusions treated with EVT versus MM. These findings reinforce clinical equipoise. Randomized clinical trials are ongoing and will provide more definite evidence.

Number of passes and outcome of endovascular treatment of anterior circulation large core ischemic stroke: insights from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry

BackgroundThe effect of multiple attempts on the outcome of endovascular treatment (EVT) of anterior circulation large ischemic core (LIC) stroke has not been fully explored.MethodsWe analyzed data from the Endovascular...

Sex Differences in Outcomes after Endovascular Thrombectomy for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard of care for patients with large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (AIS). There may be differing recanalization effectiveness based on patients' sex, and understanding such variations can improve patient outcomes by adjusting for differences. We aimed to assess the sex differences in outcome after EVT for patients with AIS. We retrospectively analyzed 250 consecutive AIS patients who underwent EVT from July 2019 to February 2022 across two large comprehensive tertiary care stroke centers in China. Outcomes of male patients were compared to females, where poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin score (mRS) of 3-6 at 90 days. Male patients had higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (12.50% vs 4.05%, p = 0.042) and higher hospitalization costs (114541.08 vs. 105790.27 RMB, p = 0.024). Male patients also had a longer median onset-to-needle time (ONT) (146.00 (104.00, 202.00) vs. 120.00 (99.25, 144.75), p = 0.026). However, there were no differences in hospitalization length (p = 0.251), 90-day favorable outcome (p = 0.952), and 90-day mortality (p = 0.931) between the sexes. Female patients had lower hospitalization costs and sICH rates than males after EVT for AIS. Identifying such differences and implementing measures, including adaptations to workflow optimization, would help to reduce the ONT and last known normal-to-puncture-time seen in males to improve patient outcomes. Despite such variations, favorable outcomes and mortality are similar in female and male AIS patients.

Incidence of intracranial bleeding in mild traumatic brain injury patients taking oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. Most TBI cases occur in older people, because they are at a higher risk of accidental falling. As the population ages, the use of anticoagulants is increasing. Some serious complications of TBI, such as intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), may occur even in mild cases. According to the current guidelines regarding managing mild TBI patients, a CT head scan is recommended for all patients receiving anticoagulation. We aim to assess the incidence of ICH in patients with mild TBI taking oral anticoagulants. Our systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024503086). Twenty-eight studies evaluating patients with a mild TBI from ten countries with a total sample size of 11,172, 5671 on DOACs, and 5501 on VKAs were included in our meta-analysis. The random-effects overall incidence of ICH among oral anticoagulated patients with mild TBI was calculated to be 9.4% [95% CI 7.2-12.1%, I2 = 89%]. The rates of immediate ICH for patients taking DOACs and VKAs were 6.4% and 10.5%, respectively. The overall rate of immediate ICH in anticoagulated mild TBI patients was 8.5% [95% CI 6.6-10.9%], with a high heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 88%). Furthermore, the rates of delayed ICH in patients with mild TBI taking DOACs and VKAs were 1.6% and 1.9%, respectively. The overall incidence of delayed ICH among oral anticoagulated mild TBI patients was 1.7% [95% CI 1-2.8%, I2 = 79%]. The overall rate of ICH among mild TBI patients taking DOAC was calculated to be 7.3% [95% CI 5.2-10.3%], with significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 79%). However, the overall ICH rate is higher in patients who take only VKAs 11.3% [95% CI 8.6-14.7%, I2 = 83%]. Patients on DOACs were at lower risk of ICH after mild TBI compared to patients on VKAs (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86, p < 0.01, I2 = 28%). Our meta-analysis confirms the need for performing brain CT scan in patients with mild TBI patients who receive oral anticoagulants before injury. Due to limited data, further multi-center, prospective studies are warranted to confirm the true incidence of traumatic ICH in patients on anticoagulants.

Efficacy and safety of Apixaban in the treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: a multi-center study.

Information regarding the safety and efficacy of specific direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in the treatment of cerebral sinus and venous thrombosis (CSVT) is scarce. Apixaban is one of the most frequently prescribed DOACs. Therefore, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of Apixaban with those of vitamin k antagonists (VKA) in patients with CSVT. Prospective CSVT databases from seven academic medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. Patients treated with Apixaban were compared to those treated with VKA. Data on demographics, clinical presentations, risk factors, radiological and outcome parameters were studied. Overall, 403 patients were included in the analysis. Of them, 48 (12%) were treated with Apixaban, and 355 (88%) were treated with VKA. Rates of coagulopathies were significantly higher in the VKA-treated patients but no other differences between the groups were found in baseline characteristics and underlying etiology. No significant differences were found between groups in efficacy or safety parameters including the rates of recanalization, favorable outcomes, one-year mortality, seizures, intracranial hemorrhage or CSVT recurrences. Our data suggests that Apixaban may be safe and effective for patients with CSVT. These results should be tested in prospective randomized clinical studies.

Timing of oral anticoagulants initiation for atrial fibrillation after acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is a longstanding clinical uncertainty regarding the optimal timing of initiating oral anticoagulants (OAC) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation following acute ischemic stroke. Current international recommendations are based on expert opinions, while significant diversity among clinicians is noted in everyday practice. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including all available randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies that investigated early versus later OAC-initiation for atrial fibrillation after acute ischemic stroke. The primary outcome was defined as the composite of ischemic and hemorrhagic events and mortality at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the components of the composite outcome (ischemic stroke recurrence, intracranial hemorrhage, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality). Pooled estimates were calculated with random-effects model. Nine studies (two RCTs and seven observational) were included comprising a total of 4946 patients with early OAC-initiation versus 4573 patients with later OAC-initiation following acute ischemic stroke. Early OAC-initiation was associated with reduced risk of the composite outcome (RR = 0.74; 95% CI:0.56-0.98; I2 = 46%) and ischemic stroke recurrence (RR = 0.64; 95% CI:0.43-0.95; I2 = 60%) compared to late OAC-initiation. Regarding safety outcomes, similar rates of intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.98; 95% CI:0.57-1.69; I2 = 21%), major bleeding (RR = 0.78; 95% CI:0.40-1.51; I2 = 0%), and mortality (RR = 0.94; 95% CI:0.61-1.45; I2 = 0%) were observed. There were no subgroup differences, when RCTs and observational studies were separately evaluated. Early OAC-initiation in acute ischemic stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation appears to have better efficacy and a similar safety profile compared to later OAC-initiation.

A comprehensive analysis of patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformation with headache: assessment of risk factors and treatment effectiveness

BackgroundDue to the high mortality and disability rate of intracranial hemorrhage, headache is not the main focus of research on cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM), so research on headaches in AVM is still scarce, and the clinical understanding is shallow. This study aims to delineate the risk factors associated with headaches in AVM and to compare the effectiveness of various intervention treatments versus conservative treatment in alleviating headache symptoms.MethodsThis study conducted a retrospective analysis of AVMs who were treated in our institution from August 2011 to December 2021. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the risk factors for headaches in AVMs with unruptured, non-epileptic. Additionally, the effectiveness of different intervention treatments compared to conservative management in alleviating headaches was evaluated through propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsA total of 946 patients were included in the analysis of risk factors for headaches. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that female (OR 1.532, 95% CI 1.173–2.001, p = 0.002), supply artery dilatation (OR 1.423, 95% CI 1.082–1.872, p = 0.012), and occipital lobe (OR 1.785, 95% CI 1.307–2.439, p < 0.001) as independent risk factors for the occurrence of headaches. There were 443 AVMs with headache symptoms. After propensity score matching, the microsurgery group (OR 7.27, 95% CI 2.82–18.7 p < 0.001), stereotactic radiosurgery group(OR 9.46, 95% CI 2.26–39.6, p = 0.002), and multimodality treatment group (OR 8.34 95% CI 2.87–24.3, p < 0.001) demonstrate significant headache relief compared to the conservative group. However, there was no significant difference between the embolization group (OR 2.24 95% CI 0.88–5.69, p = 0.091) and the conservative group.ConclusionsThis study identified potential risk factors for headaches in AVMs and found that microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and multimodal therapy had significant benefits in headache relief compared to conservative treatment. These findings provide important guidance for clinicians when developing treatment options that can help improve overall treatment outcomes and quality of life for patients.

Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of the Early Initiation of Antithrombotic Secondary Prevention in Patients Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Background and Objectives: Current guidelines and the alteplase product insert recommend that antithrombotic therapy be avoided within 24 h of intravenous thrombolytic therapy with rt-PA in acute ischemic stroke. Therefore, the rate of stroke recurrence is unclear in terms of early neurological deterioration, which we could prevent with the early administration of antithrombotic therapy. We do not know the effect of early antithrombotic therapy after intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA in acute stroke on the outcome in patients after 90 days either. Design: Prospective monocentric observational cohort study. Methods: Data were collected from consecutive patients treated with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke between January 2015 and January 2023. We examined functional outcome at 90 days, including the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality rate as safety indicators and stroke recurrence events in both early and standard antithrombotic therapy at 24 h after intravenous thrombolysis. Results: A total of 489 patients were included, of which 278 (56.9%) were men. Of these, 407 (83.2%) patients received early antithrombotic therapy. No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in any participants. There was a significantly higher number of patients with an excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) in early antithrombotic treatment (211 (53.1%) versus 28 (34.6%) in standard antithrombotic treatment (p = 0.002, OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.76). Conclusions: Early antithrombotic treatment after intravenous therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke revealed no safety concerns compared with standard antithrombotic therapy and resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients with an excellent functional outcome.

Comparative Analysis of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multicentric Observational Study from Eastern India.

Tenecteplase is used as an alternative to alteplase and is considered noninferior for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. To compare the effectiveness and adverse effects of tenecteplase and alteplase in the real-world management of acute ischemic stroke. In this retrospective observational study, we collected data from acute ischemic stroke patients admitted in six hospitals in West Bengal, India, and were thrombolysed with tenecteplase or alteplase between July 2021 and June 2022. Demographic data, baseline parameters, hospital course, and 3-month follow-up data were collected. The percentage of patients achieving a score of 0-2 in the modified Ranking scale at 3 months, rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality within 3 months were the main parameters of comparison between the two thrombolytic agents. A total of 162 patients were initially included in this study. Eight patients were excluded due to unavailability of follow-up data. Among the remaining patients, 71 patients received tenecteplase and 83 patients received alteplase. There was no statistically significant difference between tenecteplase and alteplase with respect to the percentage of patients achieving functional independence (modified Rankin scale score 0-2) at 3 months (53.5% vs. 60.2%, P = 0.706), rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (5.6% vs. 10.8%, P = 0.246), and all-cause mortality at 3 months (11.3% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.628). The effectiveness of tenecteplase is comparable to alteplase in the real-world management of acute ischemic stroke. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and all-cause mortality rates are also similar in real-world practice.

Safety of DOACs in patients with Child-Pugh Class C cirrhosis and trial fibrillation.

Anticoagulation (AC) is used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are safe in patients with AF without cirrhosis, they are hardly studied in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Our study evaluates the safety and outcomes of DOACs in patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis (CPC). We queried TriNetX Database. Patients with CPC and AF were divided into three cohorts: patients on DOACs, no AC, and warfarin. Three study arms were created using a 1:1 propensity score matching system (PSM). Totally 16 029 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 20.2% (n = 3235) were on DOACs, 47.1% (n = 7552) were not on AC, and 32.7% (n = 5242) were on warfarin. First arm comparing AC versus no AC, a statistically significant benefit was identified in 3-year mortality risk (47% vs 71%, P < 0.0001) and transplant status (17% vs 5%, p < 0.0001) with AC. However, no significant difference was identified regarding intracranial hemorrhage and GI bleeding risk. Second arm comparing patients on DOACs versus no AC, we identified mortality benefit (40% vs 72%, P < 0.0001) and a higher transplant rate (9% vs 3.2%, P < 0.0001) with DOACs. Intracranial hemorrhage rates (6% vs 4%, P = 0.03) were higher in patients on DOACs. Third arm comparing patients on DOACs versus Warfarin, a statistically significant lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (6.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.004) and GI bleed (2% vs 2.4%, P < 0.0001) were identified in patients on DOACs. Anticoagulation is safe in patients with CPC with AF and may provide a mortality benefit. DOACs are a safer alternative to warfarin.

Pediatric Patients with Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: Trends in Emergency Room Presentation

Pediatric intracranial arteriovenous malformation (AVM) patients are commonly admitted to the emergency room (ER). Increasing patient utilization of the ER has been associated with healthcare disparities and a trend of decreased efficiency. Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the trends of pediatric AVM ER admissions over recent years and identify factors associated with health care resource utilization and outcomes. The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for patients under the age of 18 admitted with AVM. Cases of admission through the ER were identified. Demographic and severity factors associated with ER admission were explored using comparative and regression statistics. Of 3,875 pediatric patients with AVM admitted between 2016-2019, 1,280 (33.0%) were admitted via the ER. Patients admitted via the ER were more likely to be in the lowest median income category (p < 0.001), on Medicaid insurance (p = 0.008), or in the South (p < 0.001) than patients admitted otherwise. There was increased severity and increased rates of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients admitted via the ER (p < 0.001). Finally, there were increasing trends in ER admission and ICH throughout the years. ER admission of pediatric AVM patients with ICH is increasing and is associated with a distinct socioeconomic profile and increased healthcare resource utilization. These findings may reflect decreased access to more advanced diagnostic modalities, primary care, and other important resources. Identifying populations with barriers to care is likely an important component to policy aimed at decreasing the risk of severe disease presentation.

Endovascular thrombectomy in wake-up stroke guided by arterial spin-labeling and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery versus diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch on MRI.

This purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of utilizing the arterial spin-labeling (ASL) combined with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) combined with DWI double mismatch in the endovascular treatment of patients diagnosed with wake-up stroke (WUS). In this single-center trial, patients diagnosed with WUS underwent thrombectomy if acute ischemic lesions were observed on DWI indicating large precerebral circulation occlusion. Patients with no significant parenchymal hypersignal on FLAIR and ASL imaging showing a hypoperfusion tissue to infarct core volume ratio of at least 1.2 were included. The participants were divided into groups receiving endovascular thrombectomy plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone, based on their subjective preference. Functional outcomes were assessed using the ordinal score on the modified Rankin scale (mRs) at 90 days, along with the rate of functional independence. In this study, a total of 77 patients were included, comprising 38 patients in the endovascular therapy group and 39 patients in the medical therapy group. The endovascular therapy group exhibited more favorable changes in the distribution of functional prognosis measured by mRs at 90 days, compared to the medical therapy group (adjusted common odds ratio, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.03 to 10.26; P < 0.01). Additionally, the endovascular therapy group had a higher proportion of patients achieving functional independence (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.36 to 11.81; P < 0.01). Importantly, there were no significant differences observed in the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage or mortality rates between the two groups. Guided by the ASL-DWI and FLAIR-DWI double mismatch, endovascular thrombectomy combined with standard medical treatment appears to yield superior functional outcomes in patients with WUS and large vessel occlusion compared to standard medical treatment alone.

Endovascular thrombectomy for treatment of isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: a real-world analysis of hospitalizations in the United States.

Despite renewed interest and recently demonstrated efficacy for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) of the posterior circulation, to date, no randomized clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate EVT for isolated occlusions of the posterior cerebral artery (IPCA). Hospitalizations for adult patients with primary admission diagnoses of IPCA occlusion were identified in the National Inpatient Sample registry during the period of 2016-2020. The study exposure was treatment with EVT, and primary clinical endpoints included favorable functional outcome (defined as discharge disposition to home without services, previously shown to have high concordance with modified Rankin scale scores 0-2), in-hospital mortality, and any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to balance baseline clinical characteristics between those receiving EVT or medical management (MM). This analysis identified 34,880 IPCA occlusion hospitalizations, 730 (2.1%) of which documented treatment with EVT. Following IPTW adjustment, EVT was associated with favorable outcome in IPCA patients presenting with mild deficits (M-D) (NIHSS < 6) [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27, 2.45; p < 0.001] and in those presenting with moderate-to-severe deficits (M-S-D) (NIHSS 6-42) (aOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.86, 2.15; p < 0.001). Mortality rates did not differ among those with M-S-D [EVT 4.8% vs. MM 4.7%, p = 0.742], while ICH rates were lower. Retrospective analysis of a large administrative registry in the Unites States demonstrates an association of EVT with favorable outcomes following IPCA occlusion, without concomitant risk of hemorrhagic transformation or mortality.

Combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis in hyperacute cerebral ischemia without significant corresponding vascular occlusion/stenosis: A Preliminary investigation

ObjectiveIn this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of various thrombolytic treatment protocols in patients with hyperacute cerebral infarction. MethodsPatients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke within 6 h of symptom onset and with brain computer tomography angiography confirming the absence of major vessel stenosis or occlusion were eligible for this study. The enrolled patients were subsequently randomized into two groups: all the groups received the standard intravenous thrombolysis treatment with rt-PA (0.9 mg/kg), and the experimental group underwent sequential intra-arterial thrombolysis treatment with alteplase (0.3 mg/kg, with a maximum dose of 22 mg), administered directly into the target vessel via a microcatheter. Both groups were closely monitored for changes in their National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, modified Rankin scale score, hemorrhage rate, all-cause mortality rate, and the rate of favorable outcomes at 90 ± 7 days. ResultsNinety-four participants were enrolled in this study, with both the control and experimental groups initiating intravenous injection of rt-PA at a median time of 29 min. For the experimental group, the median time for arterial puncture was 123 min. Baseline data for both groups were similar (P > 0.05). Hemorrhagic transformation occurred in 24.47 % (23 patients), with a lower intracranial hemorrhage rate observed in the experimental group compared to the control group (15.2 % vs 33.3 %, P < 0.05). Asymptomatic hemorrhage rates were 8.7 % for the experimental group and 12.5 % for the control group, with no hemorrhage detected in other locations. Post-treatment median NIHSS scores were lower in the experimental group than in the control group (7 vs 9, P < 0.05), but short-term NIHSS scores were similar (P > 0.05). A higher proportion of patients in the experimental group achieved favorable outcomes compared to the control group (87.0 % vs 43.8 %, P < 0.05). ConclusionIn patients with acute ischemic stroke with an onset time of ≤6 h and no major intracranial vessel occlusion, combining rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis with intra-arterial thrombolysis via a microcatheter might yield superior functional outcomes.

Comparative Efficacy of Transsphenoidal and Transcranial Approaches for Treating Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) constitute 5-10% of intracranial meningiomas, often causing visual impairment. Traditional microsurgical transcranial approaches (MTAs) have been effective, but the emergence of innovative surgical trajectories, such as endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs), has sparked debate. While EEAs offer advantages like reduced brain retraction, they are linked to higher cerebrospinal fluid leak (CSF leak) risk. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of EEAs and MTAs for the resection of TSMs, offering insights into their respective outcomes and complications. Methods: A comprehensive literature review of the databases PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid EMBASE was conducted for articles published on TSMs treated with either EEA or MTA until 2024. The systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled event rates and assess heterogeneity. Fixed- and random-effects were used to assess 95% confidential intervals (CIs) of presenting symptoms, outcomes, and complications. Results: A total of 291 papers were initially identified, of which 18 studies spanning from 2000 to 2024 met the inclusion criteria. The exclusion of 180 articles was due to reasons such as irrelevance, non-reporting of selected results, systematic literature review or meta-analysis, and a lack of details on method/results. The 18 studies comprised a total sample of 1093 patients: 444 patients who underwent EEAs and 649 patients who underwent MTAs for TSMs. Gross total resection (GTR) rates ranged from 80.9% for EEAs to 79.8% for MTAs. The rate of visual improvement was 86.6% in the EEA group and 65.4% in the MTA group. The recurrence rate in the EEA group was 6.9%, while it was 5.1% in MTA group. The postoperative complications analyzed were CSF leak, infections, dysosmia, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and endocrine disorders. The rate of CSF leak was 9.8% in the EEA group and 2.1% in MTA group. The rate of infections in the EEA group was 5.7%, while it was 3.7% in the MTA group. The rate of dysosmia ranged from 10.3% for MTAs to 12.9% for EEAs. The rate of ICH in the EEA group was 0.9%, while that in the MTA group was 3.8%. The rate of endocrine disorders in the EEA group was 10.8%, while that in the MTA group was 10.2%. No significant difference was detected in the rate of GTR between the EEA and MTA groups (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.7-0.95; p = 0.53), while a significant benefit in visual outcomes was shown in EEAs (OR 3.54, 95% CI 2.2-5.72; p < 0.01). There was no significant variation in the recurrence rate between EEA and MTA groups (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.19-4.46; p = 0.89). While a considerably increased chance of CSF leak from EEAs was shown (OR 4.47, 95% CI 2.52-7.92; p < 0.01), no significant difference between EEA and MTA groups was detected in the rate of infections (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.73-5.06; p = 0.15), the rate of dysosmia (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.31-4.99; p = 0.71), the rate of ICH (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.20-1.87; p = 0.33), and the rate of endocrine disorders (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.69-1.95; p = 0.53). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that both EEAs and MTAs are viable options for TSM resection, with distinct advantages and drawbacks. The EEAs demonstrate superior visual outcomes in selected cases while GTR and recurrence rates support the overall effectiveness of MTAs and EEAs. Endoscopic endonasal approaches had a higher chance of CSF leaks, but there are no appreciable variations in other complications. These results provide additional insights regarding patient outcomes in the intricate clinical setting of TSMs.

Does the Ischemic Core Really Matter? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Large Core Trials After TESLA, TENSION, and LASTE

Background The available evidence supporting the use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients with large core has increased with the recent release of the Thrombectomy for Emergent Salvage of Large Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke (TESLA), Efficacy and Safety of Thrombectomy In Stroke with Extended Lesion and Extended Time Window (TENSION), and Large Stroke Therapy Evaluation (LASTE) trials, providing critical information on additional subgroups not included in initial trials. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large core and stratify by several subgroups including core infarct at presentation, using a comprehensive meta‐analysis of aggregate data. Methods We executed a systematic search to identify randomized controlled trials that compared EVT to medical management (MM) for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke with large core, defined as Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score ≤5 on noncontrast CT and/or estimated ischemic core ≥50 mL on CT‐perfusion/MR diffusion. The primary outcome was the shift analysis in the 90‐day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (mRS score 0–2), independent ambulation (mRS score 0–3), 90‐day mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Pooled odds ratios were calculated for shift mRS score through the random‐effects meta‐analyses, and risk ratios (RRs) were used for the other outcomes, comparing EVT with MM alone. Results Out of 3402 titles and abstracts screened, 6 randomized controlled trials with 1886 patients were included. The EVT group had a higher shift toward a lower mRS than MM alone (odds ratio [OR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.24–1.79]). Furthermore, the use of EVT was associated with higher rates of functional independence (19.5% versus 7.5%, RR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.92–3.24]), independent ambulation (36.5% versus 19.9%, RR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.51–2.43]), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (5.5% versus 3.2%, RR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.01–2.95]) compared with MM. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding mortality (31.5% versus 36.8%, RR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.72–1.02]). Importantly, EVT was consistently associated with a shift toward a lower mRS score in both Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 3–5 (OR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.10–2.32]) and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 0–2 (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.17–1.80]) when compared with MM alone. Conclusion Our results confirm the efficacy of EVT for acute ischemic stroke with large core and suggest a consistent benefit across all Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score categories. These results represent an important shift in the current large vessel occlusion selection paradigm that currently considers core as an effect modifier for EVT selection.

Outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy for ischaemic stroke among nonagenarians with and without pre-existing dependency

BackgroundOur aim was to compare the outcomes of treatment with endovascular thrombectomy for pre-stroke dependent versus pre-stroke independent among the very elderly ≥90 years. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on 106 patients ≥90 years who underwent endovascular thrombectomy for ischaemic stroke in Western Australia between June 2016 and September 2021. Patient, stroke and procedural details along with inpatient progress and outcome at 90 days were recorded. Patients were divided into Group A (pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale 0-2) and Group B (pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale >2). Primary outcome measure was functional status at 90 days post-stroke, with favourable clinical outcome defined as a 90-day mRS category equal to the patients’ respective pre-stroke mRS category. Secondary outcome measures include successful reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, hospital length-of-stay, change in accommodation to an aged care facility, and mortality during admission, at 90 days and one year. Results61 patients were allocated to Group A and 45 to Group B. There was none with pre-stroke mRS 5. Group B had more pre-existing cognitive impairment, aged care facility residents, higher median age and lower Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score. For primary outcome measure, 38 % of patients in Group A and 49 % in Group B achieved a favourable clinical outcome. The difference was not significant (p=0.3408). For secondary outcome measures, Group B had a significantly higher 90-day mortality rate at 47 % versus 24 % in Group A (p=0.03). All other secondary outcome measures were similar between the two groups. These include the rate of successful reperfusion and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, hospital length-of-stay, new transition into an aged care facility, inpatient mortality rate and 1-year mortality rate. ConclusionWhen treated with endovascular thrombectomy for ischaemic stroke, nonagenarians with pre-existing dependency achieved a rate of favourable functional outcome comparable with their independent peers, although they also had higher 90-day mortality rate.

Endovascular revascularization of vertebrobasilar tandem occlusions in comparison to isolated basilar artery occlusions: A multi-center experience.

Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a severe disease that is associated with an 85% mortality rate if untreated. Several studies have analyzed the use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the different scenarios of BAO. However, the results remain conflicting and the role of MT as standard of care for vertebrobasilar tandem occlusions (VBTO) has not been confirmed. Our goal was to assess technical feasibility, safety, and functional outcome of endovascular treatment of VBTO in comparison to isolated BAO (IBAO). We retrospectively reviewed all prospectively collected patients with acute BAO from six tertiary centers between September 2016 and November 2021. Patients were subsequently divided into two groups: VBTO and IBAO. Baseline data, procedural details, and outcomes were compared between groups. A total of 190 patients were included, 55 presenting with a VBTO and 135 with IBAO. Successful recanalization was equally common in both groups (89.1% and 86.0%). Rates of favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale: 0-2) were higher in patients with VBTO compared to IBAO (36.4% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.048) and mortality was lower (29.1% vs. 33.3%). However, these associations faded after adjustment for confounders (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.35-2.05; aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.35-2.45). Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between the groups (VBTO: 7.3% vs. IBAO: 4.2%; p = 0.496). Endovascular treatment of VBTO is technically feasible and safe with similar rates of successful recanalization, favorable functional outcome, and mortality to those in patients with IBAO.