Intracoronary Nitroprusside Research Articles

184: THE INJECTION OF INTRA-ARTERIAL VASODILATOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF VASOPRESSOR EXTRAVASATION

Introduction: We described a case where vasopressor extravasation occurred and was mitigated immediately utilizing two novel techniques. This discussion highlights the importance of learning and understanding the rapid execution of treatment modalities in cases of subcutaneous extravasation of vasopressors. Description: A 67-year-old female with coronary artery disease, hypertension, anemia, and recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding presented to the emergency department after suffering cardiac arrest at her home. The patient was intubated and ACLS protocol was followed. The patient regained spontaneous circulation after 50 minutes. She was extremely hypotensive so a Norepinephrine infusion was started. Her hand distal to the IV became cyanotic which indicated that Norepinephrine extravasated and was causing severe vasoconstriction. We stopped the infusion of Levophed and a central line was placed.We intentionally placed an arterial line distal to the site through the brachial artery. We injected nitroprusside, a direct vasodilator, through the arterial line which is very uncommon in the ICU as medications are usually injected through the vein, not the artery. We did this in order to deliver nitroprusside directly to the forearm and hand to dilate vessels. We injected 25mg of nitroprusside and the hand immediately turned red and restored circulation. Discussion: Intracoronary nitroprusside, a vasoactive drug, has been used off-label for coronary vasospasms and is commonly used to treat congestive heart failure. Nitroprusside can effectively dilate small arteries and veins, selectively relax vascular smooth muscle and reduce peripheral vascular resistance, temporarily change hemodynamic variables, reduce blood pressure, relieve the cardiac load, and increase cardiac output.3 In the case of vasopressor extravasation, it is important to dilate the vessels in order to flush out the Norepinephrine. It is extremely difficult to perform randomized trials on vasopressor extravasation treatments due to the rare emergency nature and the non-uniformity in the methods of treatment. Although there is no literature on the use of Nitruprosside as a treatment for vasopressor extravasation, its usage in our patient’s treatment was able to successfully, and safely, salvage her hand.

A Case of No-reflow Phenomenon Improved by Intracoronary Nitroprusside Injection with Lumine™ Infusion Catheter

A Case of No-reflow Phenomenon Improved by Intracoronary Nitroprusside Injection with Lumine™ Infusion Catheter

Comparison of Coronary Vasodilation and Systemic Hemodynamic Effect of Two Doses of Intracoronary Sodium Nitroprusside for Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve

Comparison of Coronary Vasodilation and Systemic Hemodynamic Effect of Two Doses of Intracoronary Sodium Nitroprusside for Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve

Comparison of regadenoson and nitroprusside to adenosine for measurement of fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

FFR is useful in defining the physiological significance of intermediate coronary stenosis and requires induction of maximal hyperemia and measurement of pressure proximal and distal to the stenosis. Hyperemia normally is induced by either IV or IC adenosine, a medication associated with short-term side effects. IV regadenoson and IC nitroprusside have been suggested as viable alternatives. This meta-analysis aims to identify all studies comparing use of intravenous (IV) regadenoson or intracoronary (IC) nitroprusside with IV adenosine to determine differences related to the agent utilized for assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFR). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing IV regadenoson or IC nitroprusside to IV adenosine for FFR assessment. The main outcome was difference in mean FFR measurement. The main secondary outcomes were composite side-effect profile and reclassification of lesions. Seven studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 375 patients. Compared to IV adenosine, there was no difference in the mean FFR derived from IV regadenoson (p=1.0) or IC nitroprusside (p=0.48). IV regadenoson was associated with 53% lower risk of pooled side effects compared to IV adenosine (p=0.05). IC nitroprusside was associated with 97% lower risk of pooled side effects compared to IV adenosine (p<0.001). IV regadenoson and IC nitroprusside produce similar pressure-derived FFR measurements compared to IV adenosine and have a favorable side effect profile. Both can be considered as alternative agents to IV adenosine for FFR measurement. Further clinical validation is warranted.

Effect of intracoronary nitroprusside injection on flow recovery during primary PCI in acute STEMI patients.

The no/slow reflow phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) causes the destruction of the coronary microcirculation and further myocardial damage. Some studies have shown that intracoronary nitroprusside infusion is a safe and effective method for managing the no/slow reflow phenomenon. However, it is uncertain whether the injection of nitroprusside at a specific time point during PPCI can most effectively prevent no-reflow. In this study, we investigated the effect of the timing of an intracoronary nitroprusside injection on flow recovery during PPCI in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). One hundred twenty consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI were enrolled in the study. Patients who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were randomly allocated to three groups: control group (N.=40) received no nitroprusside before they completed PCI; the second group (N.=40) received nitroprusside before balloon dilatation; and the third group (N.=40) received nitroprusside after each balloon dilatation and before contrast agent refilling. The baseline clinical variables and the details of the PCI procedure were collected. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grades and the corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) were evaluated immediately after stent implantation was completed. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics, antithrombotic drugs given before PCI, and details of the PCI procedure among the three groups (P>0.05). The incidence of TIMI grade 3 after PCI was significantly higher in the nitroprusside group than in the control group (P=0.025), whereas cTFC was significantly lower in the nitroprusside group (26.6±15.2) than in the control group (38.1±21.3, P=0.001). The incidence of TIMI grade 3 after PCI was significantly higher in the third group than in the second group (P=0.045), and cTFC was significantly lower in the third group (21.5±9.5) than in the second group (31.2±18.3, P=0.002). Multivariable linear regression analyses showed that the intracoronary nitroprusside injection time was a significant predictor of cTFC after PCI. These data suggest that the intracoronary injection of nitroprusside significantly reduced the incidence of no/slow reflow during PPCI. The intracoronary injection of nitroprusside most effectively prevented the no/slow reflow phenomenon when administered between balloon dilatation and contrast agent refilling during PPCI.

Effect of Intracoronary Sodium Nitroprusside Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Periprocedural Myonecrosis: A Prospective Randomized Study

Effect of Intracoronary Sodium Nitroprusside Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Periprocedural Myonecrosis: A Prospective Randomized Study

Early Administration of Intracoronary Nitroprusside Compared with Thrombus Aspiration in Myocardial Perfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A 3-Year Clinical Follow-Up Study.

Intracoronary nitroprusside and thrombus aspiration have been demonstrated to improve myocardial perfusion during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) However, no long-term clinical studies have been performed comparing these approaches. A single medical center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the effects of intracoronary nitroprusside administration before slow/no-reflow phenomena versus thrombus aspiration during primary PCI. Forty-three consecutive patients with STEMI were enrolled in the intracoronary nitroprusside treatment group. One hundred twenty-four consecutive STEMI patients who received thrombus aspiration were enrolled; ninety-seven consecutive STEMI patients who did not receive either thrombus aspiration or intracoronary nitroprusside treatment were enrolled and served as control subjects. Patients with cardiogenic shock, who had received platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or intra-aortic balloon pump insertion were excluded. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, corrected TIMI frame count and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) were assessed prior to and following PCI by two independent cardiologists blinded to the procedures. The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years after study enrollment as a composite of recurrent myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and cardiac death were recorded. The control group had a significantly lower pre-PCI TIMI flow (≤ 1; 49.5% vs. 69.8% vs. 77.4%; p = < 0.001) compared with the nitroprusside and thrombus aspiration groups. The thrombus aspiration group had a significantly higher pre-PCI thrombus score (> 4; 98.4% vs. 88.4% vs. 74.3%; p = < 0.001) and post-PCI TMPG (3; 39.5% vs. 16.3% vs. 20.6%; p = 0.001) compared with the nitroprusside and control groups. No significant differences were noted in the post-PCI thrombus score, 30-day, 1-year and 3-year MACE rate, and Kaplan-Meier curve among 3 groups of patients. Although thrombus aspiration provided improved TMPG compared with early administration of intracoronary nitroprusside and neither of both during primary PCI, it did not have a significant impact on 30-day, 1-year and 3-year MACE rate. Acute myocardial infarction; Intracoronary nitroprusside; Thrombus aspiration.

No-reflow phenomenon during PCI in acute myocardial infarction

No-reflow phenomenon complicates percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. It significantly affects cardiac prognosis and clinical outcome. The underlying causes of no-reflow are ischaemia/reperfusion-related injury, coronary microcirculation injury and distal embolisation. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction, myocardial blush grade and myocardial contrast echocardiography are commonly used to diagnose no-reflow phenomenon. Several pharmacological agents and mechanical devices effectively prevent and treat no-reflow. This article presents a patient with acute myocardial infarction who experienced no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention. He is successfully treated with intracoronary nitroprusside, nitroglycerin (TNG), intra-arterial verapamil and intravenous abciximab.

Effect of intracoronary nitroprusside in preventing no reflow phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.

Adjunctive therapy with intracoronary nitroprusside (NTP) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) had controversial benefits in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). To evaluate the effect of intracoronary NTP on no reflow phenomenon (NR) and clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. We searched the following databases without language or time limitation in January 2014: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ISI Web of Science, and CNKI. Trials compared the effect of intracoronary NTP with control group (placebo or no NTP treatment) on NR in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI enrolled for analyzing. A total of 7 trials involving 781 patients were included into this meta-analysis. Intracoronary NTP significantly reduced the incidence of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade (TFG) ≤2 (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30-0.73, P = 0.001); the corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) (WMD: -5.28, 95% CI: -6.79 to 3.78, P = 0.000) increased the events of myocardial blush grade (MBG) ≥2 (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.24, P = 0.038), and reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (RR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.27-0.70, P = 0.001). Although the events of the complete ST segment resolution (STR) did not reach statistical significance, there was a trend indicating improvement in the intracoronary NTP group (RR: 1.143, 95% CI: 0.97-1.34, P = 0.101). Intracoronary NTP can significantly reduce the incidence of angiographic NR during PPCI, as well as the incidence of MACE. It seems to be a promising adjunctive therapy for NR during PPCI.

Repeated occurrence of slow flow phenomenon during and late after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

A 78-year-old man with unstable angina showed 90% stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending artery. Pre-procedural intravascular ultrasound revealed ruptured plaque and attenuated plaque in the lesion. Under these conditions, two overlapping sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in this lesion resulted in slow flow which was recovered by intracoronary nitrates, nicorandil, and nitroprusside without further complications. When the patient showed up again 5 years later with recurrence of angina pectoris, angiography revealed a hazy ulcerated in-stent restenosis (ISR) at the site of the SES. Pre-procedural optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging revealed multiple intimal ruptures, cavity formation behind the stent struts, a thin-cap fibroatheroma containing neointima surrounded by signal-poor, lipid-rich area in the proximal SES, suggesting the progression of neoatherosclerosis within SES. Importantly, there occurred slow flow again after balloon angioplasty for this lesion. We would suggest careful OCT examination is warranted to confirm development of neoatherosclerosis within the stent, and distal protection device should be considered to prevent slow flow phenomenon even in a patient with very late ISR.

Safety and Effectiveness of Nitroprusside in Preventing No-Reflow During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of nitroprusside injection for preventing the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2011), PubMed, EMbase, and Google Scholar for data. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 319 patients were included. The results of the meta-analyses showed that intracoronary nitroprusside is beneficial in preventing no-reflow/slow-flow, in reducing corrected TIMI frame count, and in improving left ventricular ejection fraction. It also likely reduces adverse reactions in patients after PCI and rehospitalization due to cardiovascular events. However, we must caution that in this review, there is a moderate possibility of bias with regard to patient selection, performance, and publication because of the small number of included studies. A larger sample size and high-quality RCTs are needed for a more reassuring analysis.

Intracoronary fixed dose of nitroprusside via thrombus aspiration catheter for the prevention of the no-reflow phenomenon following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction

Previous studies have shown that intracoronary (IC) nitroprusside (NTP) injection is a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of no-reflow (NR) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The present study tested the hypothesis that, on the basis of thrombus aspiration for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the selective IC administration of a fixed dose of NTP (100 μg) plus tirofiban is a safe and superior treatment method compared with the IC administration of tirofiban alone for the prevention of NR during primary PCI. A total of 162 consecutive patients with STEMI, who underwent primary PCI within 12 h of onset, were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A, IC administration of a fixed dose of NTP (100 μg) plus tirofiban (10 μg/kg) and group B, IC administration of tirofiban (10 μg/kg) alone (n=80 and n=82, respectively). The drugs were selectively injected into the infarct-related artery (IRA) via a thrombus aspiration catheter advanced into the IRA. The primary end-point was post-procedural corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count (CTFC). The proportion of complete (>70%) ST-segment resolution (STR); the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) 2–3 ratio following PCI; the peak value of creatine kinase (CK)-MB; the TIMI flow grade; the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after 6 months of follow-up were observed as the secondary end-points. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics between the two groups. Compared with group B, group A had i) a lower CTFC (23±7 versus 29±11, P=0.000); ii) a higher proportion of complete STR (72.5 versus 55.9%, P=0.040); iii) an enhanced TMPG 2–3 ratio (71.3 versus 53.7%, P=0.030) and iv) a lower peak CK-MB value (170±56 versus 210±48 U/l, P=0.010). There were no statistically significant differences in the final TIMI grade-3 flow between the two groups (92.5 versus 91.5% for groups A and B, respectively; P=0.956). The LVEF at 6 months was higher in group A than group B (63±9 versus 53±11%, respectively; P=0.001); however, the incidence of MACEs was not statistically different between the two groups, although there was a trend indicating improvement in group A (log rank χ2=0.953, P=0.489). The selective IC administration of a fixed dose of NTP (100 μg) plus tirofiban via a thrombus aspiration catheter advanced into the IRA is a safe and superior treatment method compared with tirofiban alone in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. This novel therapeutic strategy improves the myocardial level perfusion, in addition to reducing the infarct size. Furthermore, it may improve the postoperative clinical prognosis following PCI.

Open-Label, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Intracoronary Adenosine or Nitroprusside After Thrombus Aspiration During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Prevention of Microvascular Obstruction in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The REOPEN-AMI Study (Intracoronary Nitroprusside Versus Adenosine in Acute Myocardial Infarction)

This study sought to assess whether intracoronary adenosine or nitroprusside following thrombus aspiration (TA) is superior to TA alone for the prevention of microvascular obstruction (MVO) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MVO, due to its multifactorial pathogenesis, still occurs after TA in a sizeable portion of patients. We performed a placebo-controlled, randomized, open-label, blind-examination, multicenter trial. A total of 240 STEMI patients with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flowgrade 0/1 were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to receive adenosine (n= 80), nitroprusside (n= 80), orsaline (n= 80) given distal to the occluded site after TA. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ST-segment resolution (STR) >70% on surface electrocardiogram at 90 min after PCI. Secondary endpoints were angiographic MVO incidence (TIMI flow grade ≤2 or 3 with a myocardial blushgrade<2) and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate at 30 days as a composite of cardiacdeath,myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and heart failure requiring hospitalization. STR >70% occurred in in 71% of adenosine-treated patients, in 54% of nitroprusside-treated patients, and in 51% of saline-treated patients (p= 0.009 and p= 0.75, respectively, vs. saline). Angiographic MVO occurred in 18% of adenosine-treated patients, in 24% of nitroprusside-treated patients, and in 30% of saline-treated patients (p= 0.06 and p= 0.37, respectively, vs. saline). MACE occurred in 10%, 14%, and 20% of patients, respectively (p= 0.08 and p= 0.29 vs. saline). In STEMI patients treated by PCI and TA, the additional intracoronary administration of adenosine, but not that of nitroprusside, results in a significant improvement of MVO, as assessed by STR.

Evaluation of microvascular angina with TIMI frame count using nitroprusside induced hyperemia

TIMI frame count (TFC) provides a quantitative index of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Previous studies suggested the degree of frame count reserve (FCR) and slow coronary flow (SCF) correlated with microvascular dysfunction. We investigated the clinical implication of FCR and SCF for the evaluation of microvascular angina (MA). We included consecutive 77 patients with the complaint of chest pain, who subsequently had normal coronary angiography. TFC was obtained from left anterior descending artery. Intracoronary nitroprusside (15μg) was infused to induce hyperemia, and repeat angiogram was performed after 30s. FCR was calculated by dividing basal TFC by hyperemic TFC. SCF was defined as being present when TFC was more than 28. All patients underwent a treadmill test without medication after angiography. After the treadmill test, patients were divided into a MA group (40 patients) and a control group (37 patients). FCR was similar in both groups (2.0±1.0 and 2.1±0.9, MA and control group, respectively). However, hyperemic TFC induced by nitroprusside was significantly higher in the MA group (10.9±4.7) than in the control group (9.0±3.5, p<0.05). Patients who showed SCF had a significantly greater incidence of MA (78.5%; 11/14 patients) than that with normal coronary flow (46.0%; 29/63 patients, p<0.05). The higher hyperemic TFC and presence of SCF were found to have a diagnostic value for MA.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intracoronary (IC) nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine (IVA) for assessing fractional flow reserve (FFR). IV infusion of adenosine is a standard method to achieve a coronary hyperemia for FFR measurement. However, adenosine is expensive, causes multiple side effects, and is contraindicated in patients with reactive airway disease. Sodium nitroprusside (NTP) is a strong coronary vasodilator but its efficacy and safety for assessing FFR is not well established. We compared FFR response and side effects profile of IC NTP and IVA. Bolus of NTP at a dose of 100 μg and IVA (140 μg/kg/min) were used to achieve coronary hyperemia. We evaluated 75 lesions in 53 patients (60% male) mean age 61.6 ± 13.9 years. Mean FFR after NTP was similar to FFR after adenosine (0.836 ± 0.107 vs. 0.856 ± 0.106; P = 0.26; r = 0.91, P < 0.001). NTP induced maximal stable hyperemia within 10 sec (mean: 6.4 ± 1) which lasted consistently between 38 and 60 sec (mean 51 ± 7.5). NTP caused significant (14%), but asymptomatic decrease in mean blood pressure which returned to baseline within 60 sec. Adenosine caused shortness of breath in 26%, headache and flushing in 19%, and transient second degree heart block in 6% of patients. No adverse symptoms were reported after NTP. IC NTP is as effective as IVA for measuring FFR. NTP is better tolerated by patients. Since NTP is inexpensive, readily available, well tolerated, and safe, it may be a better choice for FFR assessment.

Acute Effect of Sodium Nitroprusside on Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Even in the era of thrombus aspiration and distal protection for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), microvascular dysfunction does exist and improvement of microvascular dysfunction can improve the prognosis and/or left ventricular dysfunction. We evaluated the acute effects of nitroprusside (NTP) on coronary microvascular injury that occurred after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI in 18 patients. The final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial (TIMI) flow grade after PCI was 3 in 17 patients and 2 in 1 patient. The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was improved significantly from 76 ± 42 to 45 ± 37 (P = 0.0006) by intracoronary NTP administration. IMR improved to the normal range (IMR < 30) in 9 patients (50%). Higher TIMI flow grade and lower IMR at baseline were observed more frequently in patients whose IMR recovered to normal range after NTP administration. NTP improved the microcirculatory dysfunction at the acute phase in patients who underwent PCI for STEMI and had final TIMI 3 flow in almost all cases.

Intracoronary nitroprusside is the preferred vasodilator for fractional flow reserve

Intracoronary nitroprusside is the preferred vasodilator for fractional flow reserve

Comparison of the effects of nitroprusside versus nicorandil on the slow/no-reflow phenomenon during coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction

Although slow/no-reflow is a serious problem complicating primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is associated with a poor prognosis, its efficacious treatment remains problematic. We compared the acute, in-hospital and long-term (1 year) effects of nitroprusside (NTP) with those of nicorandil (NC) on the slow/no-reflow phenomenon. Forty-nine of 442 consecutive patients with AMI who underwent primary PCI complicated by slow/no-reflow and who received intracoronary NTP (n = 25) or NC (n = 24) administration were studied. Both NTP and NC induced significant improvements in coronary flow, with increases in TIMI flow grade from 1.64 ± 0.62 to 2.74 ± 0.36 (p < 0.001) and 1.60 ± 0.86 to 2.23 ± 0.91 (p < 0.001), and in corrected TIMI frame count from 37.8 ± 15.1 to 13.7 ± 7.1 (p < 0.001) and 30.8 ± 20.7 to 19.3 ± 17.9 (p < 0.001), respectively. The degree of improvement in TIMI flow grade (post-pre/pre) and TIMI frame count (pre-post/pre) showed that NTP was more effective than NC (NTP vs. NC: 0.88 ± 0.79, 0.37 ± 0.37, p = 0.008; 0.59 ± 0.23, 0.36 ± 0.27, p = 0.003, respectively). Congestive heart failure did not tend to last beyond 3 days after onset in the NTP group, which was more than in the NC group, during hospitalization (1/25, 4/24, p = 0.143, respectively). At the 1-year follow-up, the NTP group tended to show more improvement than the NC group in MACE (5/25, 9/24, p = 0.175, respectively). NTP is a more effective treatment for slow/no-reflow associated with PCI in patients with AMI and may improve long-term clinical outcomes compared with NC.

The Use of Intracoronary Sodium Nitroprusside to Treat No-Reflow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction

The no-reflow phenomenon is characterized by an inadequate myocardial tissue perfusion in the presence of a patent epicardial coronary artery. The incidence of no-reflow appears to be highest in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction or during PCI of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). Treatment of no-reflow phenomenon is based on the intracoronary administration of medications that induce vasodilatation in small distal coronary vasculature. Sodium nitroprusside (NTP) is a direct nitric oxide donor and does not require intracellular metabolism to induce vasodilatation in microcirculation. Two patients are reported, in whom no-reflow following primary PCI of SVG and native coronary artery was successfully treated with intracoronary NTP. Repeated injections of 50 microg NTP were given selectively distal to the occlusion site utilizing coronary microcatheter (a total NTP dose of 200 microg was given in both cases). Because of the extremely short half-life, the use of intracoronary NTP was easily tolerated by both patients, without causing prolonged or profound hypotension. The authors therefore propose the use of NTP for treatment of no-reflow phenomenon in both vein grafts and native coronary arteries in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.

Intracoronary nitroprusside in the prevention of the no-reflow phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction

Background No-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a predictive factor of continuous myocardial ischemia, ventricular remodeling and cardiac dysfunction, which is closely associated with a worse prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate intracoronary nitroprusside in the prevention of the no-reflow phenomenon in AMI. Methods Ninety-two consecutive patients with AMI, who underwent primary PCI within 12 hours of onset, were randomly assigned to 2 groups: intracoronary administration of nitroprusside (group A, n=46), intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin (group B, n=46). The angiographic results were observed. The real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RT-MCE), including contrast score index (CSI), wall motion score index (WMSI), transmural contrast defect length (CDL) and serious WM abnormal length (WML) were recorded at 24 hours and 1 week post-PCI. High sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) was examined by immune rate nephelometry. N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was tested with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were followed up for six months. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were recorded. Results The incidence of final TIMI-3 flow in group A was much higher than that in Group B (P &lt;0.05), final corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) in group A decreased significantly than that in group B (P &lt;0.01). The CSI, CDL/LV length, WMSI and WL/LV length in group A were significantly lower than that in group B (P &lt;0.01). Levels of Hs-CRP and NT-proBNP at 1 week post-PCI decreased significantly in group A than that in group B (P &lt;0.01). Patients were followed up for 6 months and the incidence of MACE in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P &lt;0.05). Conclusion Intracoronary nitroprusside can improve myocardial microcirculation, leading to the decrease of the incidence of no-reflow phenomenon and better prognosis.