Intracoronary Infusion Of Acetylcholine Research Articles

Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of Intracoronary Acetylcholine Infusion and Acetylcholine Bolus Injection Protocols During Invasive Coronary Function Testing

Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) and coronary artery spasm (CAS) are causes of angina in patients with no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). Both can be diagnosed by invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) using Acetylcholine (ACh). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a 3-minute ACh infusion as compared to a 1-minute ACh bolus injection protocol in testing CED and CAS. In total 220 consecutive ANOCA patients underwent ICFT using continuous Doppler flow measurements. Per protocol, 110 patients were tested using 3-minute infusion and thereafter 110 patients using 1-minute bolus injections, due to a protocol change. CED was defined as a <50% increase in coronary blood flow or any epicardial vasoconstriction in reaction to low dose ACh and CAS according to the COVADIS criteria, both with and without T-wave abnormalities, in reaction to high dose ACh. The prevalence of CED was equal in both protocols (78% vs 79%; p=0.869). Regarding the endotypes of CAS according to COVADIS, the equivocal endotype was diagnosed less often in the 3-minutes vs 1-minute protocol (24% vs 44%; p=0.004). Including T-wave abnormalities to the COVADIS criteria resulted in a similar diagnostic yield of both protocols. Hemodynamic changes from baseline to the low or high ACh doses were comparable between the protocols for each endotype. In conclusion, ICFT using 3-minute infusion or 1-minute bolus injections of ACh showed a similar diagnostic yield of CED. When using the COVADIS criteria, a difference in the equivocal diagnosis was observed. Including T-wave abnormalities as diagnostic criterion reclassified equivocal test results into CAS and decreased this difference. For clinical practice, we recommend the inclusion of T-wave abnormalities as diagnostic criterion for CAS and the 1-minute bolus protocol for practicality.

Rethinking the false positive exercise stress test in the context of coronary microvascular dysfunction

Abstract Background Exercise stress testing (EST) was the traditional tool to detect myocardial ischaemia, but its use has declined due to its perceived high false positive rate. However, EST was historically validated against the reference standard of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). It is now well recognised that myocardial ischaemia can occur in the absence of CAD and this cohort, termed angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA), comprises nearly 50% of all patients presenting with stable angina. Purpose Our study assesses the accuracy of EST in detecting a substrate for myocardial ischaemia, with the reference standard being comprehensive coronary physiology assessment in patients with ANOCA. Methods Patients with typical angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries underwent physiological characterisation of the coronary circulation using a dual sensor-tipped intracoronary guidewire in the left anterior descending artery. The epicardial vessel was assessed by Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and the microcirculation by both endothelium-independent function (coronary flow reserve, CFR, using intravenous adenosine) and endothelium-dependent function (acetylcholine flow reserve, AChFR, using intracoronary acetylcholine infusion). Those with FFR≤0.80 were excluded per protocol. Coronary microvascular dysfunction was defined a priori as impaired CFR (&amp;lt;2.5) or impaired AChFR (≤1.5). All patients underwent a treadmill EST, using a standard Bruce protocol, with ischaemic electrocardiographic (ECG) changes defined as the appearance of 0.1mV ST-segment depression 80 milliseconds from the J-point. Patients, physiologists, and researchers were all blinded to the coronary physiology data. All data are presented as mean±SD or median (IQR). Results Ninety-one patients [67% female, 62±9 years, CCS 3 (2 to 3)] were recruited into this study. EST was performed 27 (15 to 139) days after angiography. Twenty-seven patients (30%) developed ischaemic ECG changes during their EST (Ischaemic group), whereas 64 patients (70%) did not (Control group). Both groups were phenotypically similar for demographics, risk factors, exercise time and FFR (Figure 1). 100% of the Ischaemic group and 69% of the control group had CMD. Conversely, 38% of patients with CMD developed ischaemic ECG changes on exercise but none (0%) of those with normal microvascular function did (p=0.001) (Figure 2A). The false positive rates with progressively granular reference standards are depicted in Figure 2B; there were no false positive ESTs using a comprehensive physiological reference standard. Angina reported during EST was less specific for CMD than induced ECG changes (70% vs 100%, p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusions In patients with ANOCA a positive EST is always indicative of CMD. The potential utility of EST as a rule-in test for CMD makes it an attractive non-invasive widely available test that could be re-integrated into clinical pathways for assessing new onset angina.Patient characteristicsEST versus coronary physiology

Characterizing Mechanisms of Ischemia in Patients With Myocardial Bridges.

Myocardial bridges (MBs) are prevalent and can be associated with acute and chronic ischemic syndromes. We sought to determine the substrates for ischemia in patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries and a MB in the left anterior descending artery. Patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries underwent the acquisition of intracoronary pressure and flow during rest, supine bicycle exercise, and adenosine infusion. Coronary wave intensity analysis was performed, with perfusion efficiency defined as accelerating wave energy/total wave energy (%). Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was defined as a reduction in epicardial vessel diameter ≥20% in response to intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. Patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries and a MB were compared with 2 angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries groups with no MB: 1 with coronary microvascular disease (CMD: coronary flow reserve, <2.5) and 1 with normal coronary flow reserve (reference: coronary flow reserve, ≥2.5). Ninety-two patients were enrolled in the study (30 MB, 33 CMD, and 29 reference). Fractional flow reserve in these 3 groups was 0.86±0.05, 0.92±0.04, and 0.94±0.05; coronary flow reserve was 2.5±0.5, 2.0±0.3, and 3.2±0.6. Perfusion efficiency increased numerically during exercise in the reference group (65±9%-69±13%; P=0.063) but decreased in the CMD (68±10%-50±10%; P<0.001) and MB (66±9%-55±9%; P<0.001) groups. The reduction in perfusion efficiency had distinct causes: in CMD, this was driven by microcirculation-derived energy in early diastole, whereas in MB, this was driven by diminished accelerating wave energy, due to the upstream bridge, in early systole. Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was more common in the MB group (54% versus 29% reference and 38% CMD). Overall, 93% of patients with a MB had an identifiable ischemic substrate. MBs led to impaired coronary perfusion efficiency during exercise, which was due to diminished accelerating wave energy in early systole compared with the reference group. Additionally, there was a high prevalence of endothelial and microvascular dysfunction. These ischemic mechanisms may represent distinct treatment targets.

Coronary Slow Flow Is Not Diagnostic of Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Angina and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries.

Background Guidelines recommend that coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP), defined as corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (CTFC) 27, can diagnose coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in patients with angina and nonobstructed coronary arteries. CSFP has also historically been regarded as a sign of coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED). We sought to validate the utility of CTFC, as a binary classifier of CSFP and as a continuous variable, to diagnose CMD and CED. Methods and Results Patients with angina and nonobstructed coronary arteries had simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measured using a dual sensor-tipped guidewire during rest, adenosine-mediated hyperemia, and intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. CMD was defined as the inability to augment coronary blood flow in response to adenosine (coronary flow reserve <2.5) and CED in response to acetylcholine (acetylcholine flow reserve ≤1.5); 152 patients underwent assessment using adenosine, of whom 82 underwent further acetylcholine testing. Forty-six patients (30%) had CSFP, associated with lower flow velocity and higher microvascular resistance as compared with controls (16.56.9 versus 20.26.9 cm/s; P=0.001 and 6.261.83 versus 5.361.83 mm Hg/cm/s; P=0.009, respectively). However, as a diagnostic test, CSFP had poor sensitivity and specificity for both CMD (26.7% and 65.2%) and CED (21.1% and 56.0%). Furthermore, on receiver operating characteristics analyses, CTFC could not predict CMD or CED (area under the curve, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.32%-0.50%] and 0.36 [95% CI, 0.23%-0.49%], respectively). Conclusions In patients with angina and nonobstructed coronary arteries, CSFP and CTFC are not diagnostic of CMD or CED. Guidelines supporting the use of CTFC in the diagnosis of CMD should be revisited.

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function

Approximately 40% of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for investigation of angina are found to have no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). Abnormal coronary function underlies coronary vasomotion syndromes including coronary endothelial dysfunction, microvascular angina, vasospastic angina, post-PCI angina and myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Each of these endotypes are distinct subgroups, characterized by specific disease mechanisms. Diagnostic criteria and linked therapy for these conditions are now established by expert consensus and clinical guidelines. Coronary function tests are performed as an adjunctive interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP) in appropriately selected patients during coronary angiography. This aids differentiation of patients according to endotype. The IDP includes two distinct components: a diagnostic guidewire test and a pharmacological coronary reactivity test. The tests last approximately 5 minutes for the former and 10-15 minutes for the latter. Patient safety and staff education are key. The diagnostic guidewire test measures parameters of coronary flow limitation (fractional flow reserve [FFR], coronary flow reserve [CFR], microvascular resistance [index of microvascular resistance (IMR)], basal resistance index, and vasodilator function [CFR, resistive reserve ratio (RRR)]). The pharmacological coronary reactivity test measures the vasodilator potential and propensity to vasospasm of both the main coronary arteries and the micro-vessels. It involves intra-coronary infusion of acetylcholine and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Acetylcholine is not licensed for parenteral use and is therefore prescribed on a named-patient basis. Vasodilatation is the normal, expected response to infusion of physiological concentrations of acetylcholine. Vascular spasm represents an abnormal response, which supports the diagnosis of vasospastic angina. The purpose of this practical guide is to provide information on the preparation and administration of the IDP in clinical practice. It discusses some key preparation and safety considerations, as well as tips for procedural success. The IDP supports stratified medicine for a personalized approach to health and wellbeing.

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: a Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function.

Approximately 40% of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for investigation of angina are found to have no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). Abnormal coronary function underlies coronary vasomotion syndromes including coronary endothelial dysfunction, microvascular angina, vasospastic angina, post-PCI angina and myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Each of these endotypes are distinct subgroups, characterized by specific disease mechanisms. Diagnostic criteria and linked therapy for these conditions are now established by expert consensus and clinical guidelines. Coronary function tests are performed as an adjunctive interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP) in appropriately selected patients during coronary angiography. This aids differentiation of patients according to endotype. The IDP includes two distinct components: a diagnostic guidewire test and a pharmacological coronary reactivity test. The tests last approximately 5 minutes for the former and 10-15 minutes for the latter. Patient safety and staff education are key. The diagnostic guidewire test measures parameters of coronary flow limitation (fractional flow reserve [FFR], coronary flow reserve [CFR], microvascular resistance [index of microvascular resistance (IMR)], basal resistance index, and vasodilator function [CFR, resistive reserve ratio (RRR)]). The pharmacological coronary reactivity test measures the vasodilator potential and propensity to vasospasm of both the main coronary arteries and the micro-vessels. It involves intra-coronary infusion of acetylcholine and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Acetylcholine is not licensed for parenteral use and is therefore prescribed on a named-patient basis. Vasodilatation is the normal, expected response to infusion of physiological concentrations of acetylcholine. Vascular spasm represents an abnormal response, which supports the diagnosis of vasospastic angina. The purpose of this practical guide is to provide information on the preparation and administration of the IDP in clinical practice. It discusses some key preparation and safety considerations, as well as tips for procedural success. The IDP supports stratified medicine for a personalized approach to health and wellbeing.

Assessment of the endothelial function and spasm provocation test performed by intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine. Technical report from the ACI-SEC

Assessment of the endothelial function and spasm provocation test performed by intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine. Technical report from the ACI-SEC

Machine learning aids clinical decision-making in patients presenting with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease.

The current gold standard comprehensive assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is through a limited-access invasive catheterization lab procedure. We aimed to develop a point-of-care tool to assist clinical guidance in patients presenting with chest pain and/or an abnormal cardiac functional stress test and with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD). This study included 1893 NOCAD patients (<50% angiographic stenosis) who underwent CMD evaluation as well as an electrocardiogram (ECG) up to 1-year prior. Endothelial-independent CMD was defined by coronary flow reserve (CFR) ≤2.5 in response to intracoronary adenosine. Endothelial-dependent CMD was defined by a maximal percent increase in coronary blood flow (%ΔCBF) ≤50% in response to intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. We trained algorithms to distinguish between the following outcomes: CFR ≤2.5, %ΔCBF ≤50, and the combination of both. Two classes of algorithms were trained, one depending on ECG waveforms as input, and another using tabular clinical data. Mean age was 51 ± 12 years and 66% were females (n = 1257). Area under the curve values ranged from 0.49 to 0.67 for all the outcomes. The best performance in our analysis was for the outcome CFR ≤2.5 with clinical variables. Area under the curve and accuracy were 0.67% and 60%. When decreasing the threshold of positivity, sensitivity and negative predictive value increased to 92% and 90%, respectively, while specificity and positive predictive value decreased to 25% and 29%, respectively. An artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm may be able to assist clinical guidance by ruling out CMD in patients presenting with chest pain and/or an abnormal functional stress test. This algorithm needs to be prospectively validated in different cohorts.

Machine learning aids clinical decision making in patients presenting with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Abstract Background Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The current gold-standard comprehensive assessment of CMD is through a limited-access invasive catheterization lab procedure. Purposes We aimed to develop a point-of-care tool to assist clinical guidance in patients presenting with chest pain and/or an abnormal functional stress test and with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) based on demographic data and resting ECG waveforms. Methods This study included 1,893 NOCAD patients (&amp;lt;50% angiographic stenosis) who underwent CMD evaluation as well as a standard ECG up to 1 year prior. Microvascular endothelial-independent dysfunction was defined by abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR) &amp;lt;2.5 in response to intracoronary adenosine administration. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction was defined by a maximal percent increase in coronary blood flow (%ΔCBF) ≤50% in response to intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. We trained algorithms to distinguish between the following outcomes: CFR ≤2.5, ΔCBF (%) ≤50, and the combination of both. Two classes of algorithms were trained, one depending on ECG waveforms as input, and another using tabular style clinical data. The optimal classification threshold was determined by maximizing Youden's J. Results Mean age was 51±12 years and 66% were females (n=1,257). AUC values ranged from 0.49 to 0.67 for all the outcomes. The best performance in our analysis was for the outcome CFR ≤2.5 via logistic regression on tabular variables. AUC and accuracy were 0.67 and 60%; while sensitivity and NPV were 70% and 85%. Specificity and PPV were 56% and 0.35%. When decreasing the threshold from the “optimal” one (24%) to 15%, sensitivity and NPV increased to 92% and 90% respectively, while specificity and PPV decreased to 25% and 29% respectively (Figure 2). Conclusion An AI-enabled algorithm may be able to assist clinical guidance by ruling out CMD in patients presenting with chest pain and/or an abnormal functional stress test. This algorithm needs to be prospectively validated in different cohorts. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): The James Nutter Family &amp; Maria Long Family Fellowship in Cardiovascular Research and Mayo Clinic Figure 1Figure 2

Impact of glycemic variability on coronary and peripheral endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease

Background: Previous studies have reported that glucose variability leads to endothelial dysfunction and progression of coronary atherosclerosis. However, few studies have directly evaluated the relation between glucose variability and coronary endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).Methods: A total of 38 patients with chronic CAD and a history of coronary drug-eluting stent implantation were enroled. Coronary endothelial function was evaluated by measuring the coronary vasoreactivity using quantitative coronary angiography in the segment distal to implanted stent in response to intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) infusion (10−7 mol/l). Peripheral endothelial function was also assessed with reactive hyperemia index (RHI). The mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) was calculated as a primary metric of glucose variability using a flash glucose monitoring system.Results: Of 38 patients, 17 (45%) had diabetes mellitus. The mean levels of glycated hemoglobin, MAGE, and RHI were 6.3 ± 0.8%, 71.4 ± 29.8 mg/dl, and 1.85 ± 0.63. In the distal segment to coronary stent, lumen diameter was constricted by 0.6 ± 7.3% in response to intracoronary ACh infusion compared to that at baseline. While peripheral endothelial function assessed with RHI was not significantly associated with MAGE (r = −0.16, p = 0.35), coronary endothelial function was correlated with MAGE (r = −0.38, p = 0.02).Conclusion: Greater glucose variability was significantly associated with coronary rather than peripheral endothelial dysfunction in patients with CAD, suggesting an impact of glucose variability on coronary atherosclerosis.

Función endotelial y microvascular distal a stents farmacoactivos sin polímero y captadores de células endoteliales. Estudio aleatorizado FUNCOMBO

Introduction and objectivesThe vasomotor function of new-generation drug-eluting stents designed to enhance stent healing and reendothelialization is unknown. This study aimed to compare the endothelial function of the infarct-related artery (IRA) treated with bioactive circulating endothelial progenitor cell-capturing sirolimus-eluting stents (COMBO) vs polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents (BioFreedom) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients at 6 months. Secondary objectives were to compare the microcirculatory function of the IRA and stent healing at 6 months. MethodsSixty patients were randomized to bioactive sirolimus-eluting stent vs polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents implantation. At 6 months, patients underwent coronary angiography with vasomotor, microcirculatory and optical coherence tomography examinations. Endothelial dysfunction of the distal coronary segment was defined as ≥ 4% vasoconstriction to intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. ResultsEndothelial dysfunction was similarly observed between groups (64.0% vs 62.5%, respectively; P=.913). Mean lumen diameter decreased by 16.0 ±20.2% vs 16.1 ±21.6% during acetylcholine infusion (P=.983). Microcirculatory function was similar in the 2 groups: coronary flow reserve was 3.23 ±1.77 vs 3.23±1.62 (P=.992) and the index of microcirculatory resistance was 24.8±16.8 vs 21.3±12.0 (P=.440). Optical coherence tomography findings were similar: uncovered struts (2.3% vs 3.2%; P=.466), malapposed struts (0.1% vs 0.3%; P=.519) and major evaginations (7.1% vs 5.6%; P=.708) were observed in few cases. ConclusionsEndothelial dysfunction of the IRA was frequent and was similarly observed with new-generation drug-eluting stents designed to enhance stent reendothelialization at 6 months. Endothelial dysfunction was observed despite almost preserved microcirculatory function and complete stent coverage. Larger and clinically powered studies are needed to assess the role of residual endothelial dysfunction in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04202172Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en

Coronary endothelial and microvascular function distal to polymer-free and endothelial cell-capturing drug-eluting stents. The randomized FUNCOMBO trial

Introduction and objectivesThe vasomotor function of new-generation drug-eluting stents designed to enhance stent healing and reendothelialization is unknown. This study aimed to compare the endothelial function of the infarct-related artery (IRA) treated with bioactive circulating endothelial progenitor cell-capturing sirolimus-eluting stents (COMBO) vs polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents (BioFreedom) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients at 6 months. Secondary objectives were to compare the microcirculatory function of the IRA and stent healing at 6 months. MethodsSixty patients were randomized to bioactive sirolimus-eluting stent vs polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents implantation. At 6 months, patients underwent coronary angiography with vasomotor, microcirculatory and optical coherence tomography examinations. Endothelial dysfunction of the distal coronary segment was defined as ≥ 4% vasoconstriction to intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. ResultsEndothelial dysfunction was similarly observed between groups (64.0% vs 62.5%, respectively; P=.913). Mean lumen diameter decreased by 16.0 ±20.2% vs 16.1 ±21.6% during acetylcholine infusion (P=.983). Microcirculatory function was similar in the 2 groups: coronary flow reserve was 3.23 ±1.77 vs 3.23±1.62 (P=.992) and the index of microcirculatory resistance was 24.8±16.8 vs 21.3±12.0 (P=.440). Optical coherence tomography findings were similar: uncovered struts (2.3% vs 3.2%; P=.466), malapposed struts (0.1% vs 0.3%; P=.519) and major evaginations (7.1% vs 5.6%; P=.708) were observed in few cases. ConclusionsEndothelial dysfunction of the IRA was frequent and was similarly observed with new-generation drug-eluting stents designed to enhance stent reendothelialization at 6 months. Endothelial dysfunction was observed despite almost preserved microcirculatory function and complete stent coverage. Larger and clinically powered studies are needed to assess the role of residual endothelial dysfunction in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04202172

Artificial intelligence-derived physiological aging is associated with coronary endothelial dysfunction

Abstract Background An Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled algorithm can provide an age estimate from a single standard resting ECG. The gap between AI-estimated age (ECG age) and chronological age (Age-Gap) has been associated with total and cardiovascular mortality. We hypothesized that coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED), an early feature of coronary atherosclerosis, is associated with physiological aging, as measured by ECG age. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the association of CED, a potential index of cardiac aging, and AI-estimated physiological aging. Methods 1902 patients with signs and/or symptoms of ischemia and with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (&amp;lt;40% angiographic stenosis) who underwent functional coronary angiography with intracoronary (IC) acetylcholine (Ach) infusions and a resting ECG within one year were included in this analysis. CED was defined as coronary artery constriction [%ΔCoronary artery diameter (CAD) &amp;lt;0] in response to IC Ach. Patients were categorized as CED+ or CED−. The ECG age were calculated by a previously-trained AI algorithm that was built using the Keras framework with Tensorflow backend and Python. The association between ECG-age and Age-Gap, with CED was investigated. Results Average chronological age was 50.9±12.5, ECG age was 54.1±11.6, 1261 (66%) were females. Compared to CED−, the CED+ group had more males and hyperlipidaemia (p&amp;lt;0.05 for both). Age-gap was significantly higher in patients with CED+ (Fig. A). Multiple regression analysis showed that CED+ was associated with Age-gap (standardized β [sβ] coefficient = 0.08, P=0.001) even after adjustment for chronological age (sβ coefficient = 0.07, P=0.001), and even after adjusting for other cardiovascular risk factors like gender and obesity (sβ coefficient = 0.07, P&amp;lt;0.0001). Furthermore, there is a significant gradual increase in vasoconstriction, in response to IC Ach, with increasing Age-gap (Fig. B). Conclusion Abnormal coronary endothelial function is associated with an increased AI-estimated age which could indicate a higher physiological age. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with exertional haemodynamic abnormalities in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

This study uniquely explored the relationship between coronary microvascular function and exercise haemodynamics using concurrent invasive testing. Fifty-one consecutive patients with unexplained cardiac exertion symptoms, non-obstructive coronary artery disease and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (>50%) underwent haemodynamic exercise assessment and concurrent coronary reactivity testing. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was defined as a pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) ≥15 mmHg at rest and/or ≥25 mmHg at peak exercise. Endothelium-independent coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) was defined as a coronary flow reserve (CFR) ≤2.5, while endothelium-dependent CMD was defined as ≤50% increase in coronary blood flow (CBF) in response to intracoronary acetylcholine infusions. Patients with HFpEF (n=22) had significantly lower CFR (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.2 ± 0.7; P=0.0003) and median %CBF increase in response to intracoronary acetylcholine [1 (-35; 34) vs. 64 (-4; 133); P=0.002] compared to patients without HFpEF (n=29). PAWP was significantly higher in patients with endothelium-independent CMD compared to controls during both rest and exercise. This significant elevation was only present during exercise in patients with endothelium-dependent CMD compared to controls. CFR had significant inverse correlations with PAWP at rest (r=-0.31; P=0.03) and peak exercise (r=-0.47, P=0.001). CFR also had positive correlations with maximal exercise capacity (in W/kg) (r=0.33, P=0.02). Coronary microvascular function is inversely associated with filling pressures, particularly during exercise. Both types of CMD are associated with higher filling pressures at peak exercise. These findings underscore the potential mechanism and therapeutic target for CMD and HFpEF.

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.

Many patients with chest pain undergoing coronary angiography do not show significant obstructive coronary lesions. A substantial proportion of these patients have abnormalities in the function and structure of coronary microcirculation due to endothelial and smooth muscle cell dysfunction. The coronary microcirculation has a fundamental role in the regulation of coronary blood flow in response to cardiac oxygen requirements. Impairment of this mechanism, defined as coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), carries an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular clinical outcomes. Coronary endothelial dysfunction accounts for approximately two-thirds of clinical conditions presenting with symptoms and signs of myocardial ischemia without obstructive coronary disease, termed “ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery disease” (INOCA) and for a small proportion of “myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease” (MINOCA). More frequently, the clinical presentation of INOCA is microvascular angina due to CMD, while some patients present vasospastic angina due to epicardial spasm, and mixed epicardial and microvascular forms. CMD may be associated with focal and diffuse epicardial coronary atherosclerosis, which may reinforce each other. Both INOCA and MINOCA are more common in females. Clinical classification of CMD includes the association with conditions in which atherosclerosis has limited relevance, with non-obstructive atherosclerosis, and with obstructive atherosclerosis. Several studies already exist which support the evidence that CMD is part of systemic microvascular disease involving multiple organs, such as brain and kidney. Moreover, CMD is strongly associated with the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), diabetes, hypertensive heart disease, and also chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Since coronary microcirculation is not visible on invasive angiography or computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA), the diagnosis of CMD is usually based on functional assessment of microcirculation, which can be performed by both invasive and non-invasive methods, including the assessment of delayed flow of contrast during angiography, measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR), evaluation of angina induced by intracoronary acetylcholine infusion, and assessment of myocardial perfusion by positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (CMR).

Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction Is Associated With Increased Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation.

BackgroundCoronary artery disease risk factors are associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED). We hypothesized that CED is associated with increased risk of incident AF among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease.Methods and ResultsThree hundred patients with chest pain, nonobstructive coronary artery disease, and no history of AF underwent intracoronary acetylcholine infusion for evaluation of baseline epicardial (decrease in mid–left anterior descending coronary artery diameter in response to acetylcholine) and microvascular (<50% increase in coronary blood flow in response to acetylcholine) CED. Primary outcome was incident AF over a mean follow‐up period of 10.5±5.5 years. Mean age was 53.3±10.8 years, and 70% were women. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were similar between patients with CED (n=256) and those with normal endothelial function (n=44). Overall, 35 of 300 (12%) patients developed AF, among whom 34 of 35 (97%) had CED at baseline. Compared with normal endothelial function, the presence of CED was associated with 11% increased absolute risk and 5.8‐fold increased relative risk of incident AF. Moreover, CED (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.27–47.0) and increased (>34 mL/m2) left atrial volume index (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.60–9.11) were independent predictors of incident AF.ConclusionsPatients with normal coronary endothelial function, as compared with those with CED and similar AF risk factors, have significantly lower incidence of AF on long‐term follow‐up. The potential mechanistic link between vascular dysfunction and AF development warrants further investigation.

Prevalence of myocardial bridging associated with coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with chest pain and non-obstructive coronary artery disease.

Myocardial bridging (MB), characterised by the epicardial coronary vessel diving into the myocardium, is present in up to one third of adults and is associated with angina and acute coronary syndromes. MB is accompanied by altered blood flow mechanics and regional changes in wall sheer stress. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between myocardial bridging and coronary endothelial dysfunction. Patients presenting with chest pain and found to have non-obstructive CAD (stenosis <40%) on angiography underwent an invasive assessment of epicardial and microvascular endothelial function. Epicardial endothelial function was assessed by measuring the percent change in coronary artery diameter in response to intracoronary infusions of acetylcholine (%ΔCADAch). Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was defined as a %ΔCADAch of <-20%. Microvascular endothelial function was assessed by the percent change in coronary blood flow in response to intracoronary infusions of acetylcholine (%ΔCBFAch), and microvascular endothelial dysfunction was defined as a %ΔCBFAch of <50%. MB was diagnosed angiographically by identifying the characteristic reduction in minimal luminal diameter during systole. Patients were divided into those with and those without MB, and the frequency of epicardial endothelial dysfunction and microvascular endothelial dysfunction was compared between patients with versus those without MB. Between 1993 and 2012, 1,469 patients (mean age 50.4 years, 35% male) underwent coronary angiography and invasive testing of endothelial function. Two hundred and eight (14.2%) patients were found to have MB in the LAD. Patients with any MB had a significantly higher frequency of endothelial dysfunction within the mid and/or distal vessel segment compared to patients without MB (60.1% vs 50.4%, p=0.012). In multivariate analyses, mid and/or distal vessel MB was a significant predictor of mid and/or distal vessel epicardial endothelial dysfunction (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.04-2.00, p=0.029) and of microvascular endothelial dysfunction (OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.00-1.82, p=0.050). MB co-localises with epicardial endothelial dysfunction and is significantly associated with microvascular endothelial dysfunction in symptomatic patients with non-obstructive CAD, supporting its potential role as a mechanism for angina in symptomatic patients with MB.

Endothelium-dependent and independent coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Coronary microvascular inflammation is hypothesized to play a fundamental role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). No study has directly evaluated both endothelium-dependent and independent coronary microvascular function in HFpEF. Consecutive patients with HFpEF undergoing invasive coronary physiologic testing and echocardiography were examined. Endothelial function was quantified by the increase in coronary blood flow in response to intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine (10-6 -10-4 mol/L) using a Doppler flow wire with quantitative angiography. Endothelium-independent coronary microvascular function was assessed by the hyperaemic increase in coronary flow reserve in response to adenosine infusion. Among 162 HFpEF patients (67% women), coronary microvascular function was abnormal in 117 (72%). Isolated endothelium-dependent microvascular dysfunction was present in 47 patients (29%), isolated endothelium-independent microvascular dysfunction in 53 patients (33%), and combined microvascular dysfunction in 17 patients (10%). The presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction was not identifiable from medical co-morbidities or other clinical characteristics. As compared to patients with normal endothelium-independent function, HFpEF patients with endothelium-independent coronary microvascular dysfunction displayed lower diastolic relaxation velocities (7.0± 1.8 vs. 8.4± 2.9cm/s, P= 0.002) and higher estimated filling pressures (E/e' 13.1± 4.1 vs. 9.6± 3.4, P< 0.001). There were no relationships between left ventricular structure, function, or haemodynamics and endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilatation. Endothelium-independent microvascular dysfunction was associated with increased mortality. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is common in patients with HFpEF and is caused equally by endothelium-dependent and independent mechanisms, but the presence of microvascular dysfunction cannot be identified from clinical markers and co-morbidities alone. Patients with HFpEF and endothelium-independent microvascular dysfunction display worse diastolic dysfunction and outcomes.

5879Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with poor glycemic control in women with diabetes presenting with chest pain and non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Abstract Background Patients with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk of cardiovascular events compared to individuals without diabetes. The role glycemic control plays in reducing cardiovascular risk remains uncertain. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is more frequent in women compared to men, is prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes and is linked to adverse cardiovascular events. We compared the association between CMD and glycemic control across sexes in patients with chest pain and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Patients with chest pain who were found to have non-obstructive CAD (stenosis &lt;40%) at angiography underwent an invasive assessment of endothelial-independent and endothelial–dependent coronary microvascular function. Using a Doppler guidewire, endothelial-independent microvascular function was assessed by measuring the coronary flow velocity in response to intracoronary adenosine and comparing this to baseline to calculate the coronary flow reserve ratio (CFRAdn). A CFRAdn ≤2.5 was considered abnormal. Endothelial-dependent microvascular function was assessed by measuring the percent change in coronary blood flow in response to intracoronary infusions of acetylcholine (%ΔCBFAch), with a %ΔCBFAch ≤50% considered abnormal. Patients were classified as having normal versus abnormal CFRAdn and %ΔCBFAch. Measurements of HbA1c and fasting serum glucose were obtained at the time of catheterization and compared between groups after stratification by sex. Results Between 1993 and 2012, 1,469 patients (mean age 50.4 years, 35% male) underwent coronary angiography and invasive testing for CMD, of which 129 (8.8%) had type 2 diabetes. Fifty one (39.5%) had an abnormal %ΔCBFAch and 49 (38.0%) had an abnormal CFRAdn. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors did not vary significantly between groups. Females with an abnormal CFRAdn or abnormal %ΔCBFAch had a significantly higher HbA1c compared to those with a normal CFRAdn or %ΔCBFAch respectively: HbA1c % (standard deviation) 7.4 (2.1) vs. 6.5 (1.1), p=0.035 and 7.3 (1.9) vs. 6.4 (1.2), p=0.022, respectively. Females with an abnormal CFRAdn had significantly higher fasting serum glucose concentrations compared to those with a normal CFRAdn: fasting serum glucose mg/dL (standard deviation) 144.4 (55.6) vs. 121.9 (28.1), p=0.035. These effects were not observed in men. Amongst female diabetics, a higher HbA1c was significantly associated with any CMD after adjusting for covariates: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.69 (1.01 – 2.86) p=0.049; and a fasting serum glucose &gt;140 mg/dL was significantly associated with an abnormal CFRAdn, 4.28 (1.43–12.81). Conclusion Poor glycemic control is associated with CMD in females with diabete who present with chest pain and non-obstructive CAD. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific risk stratification models and treatment strategies when managing cardiovascular risk in diabetics. Acknowledgement/Funding Mayo Foundation

Metabolic Parameters As Independent Markers For Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction In Humans

Background and Aims: Reciprocal relationships between endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance have been demonstrated in previous experimental studies. In human, there is no detailed investigation of relationships between metabolic parameters and coronary endothelial dysfunction. In this study, we investigated the relationships between metabolic parameters and coronary endothelial function using intracoronary (IC) acetylcholine (ACh) infusion test.