Intracavitary Electrocardiography Research Articles

A new wireless device for bedside assessment of tip location of central venous access devices using intracavitary ECG: A retrospective study.

Intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG) is a non-invasive method for intraprocedural tip location during central venous catheterization. Over the last 20 years, the IC-ECG method has been thoroughly investigated and many studies have confirmed its wide applicability and feasibility, as well as its great accuracy and safety in different populations of patients and in different types of central venous access devices (CVADs). This retrospective study presents a two-center experience with tip location of central venous catheters using IC-ECG, by means of a new wireless portable device. Tip location was performed during 983 insertions of CVADs at bedside, using this new device. Clinical conditions with limited or no applicability of IC-ECG were excluded. The feasibility of IC-ECG, as performed using the novel device, was 92.2%. This wireless device may play an important role in central venous catheterization at bedside, since it is pocket-sized, particularly easy to use, and easy to sanify after use.

A narrative review on tip navigation and tip location of central venous access devices in the neonate: Intracavitary ECG or real time ultrasound?

The proper location of the tip of a central venous access device plays a crucial role in minimizing the risks potentially associated with its use. Recent guidelines strongly recommend preferring real-time, intra-procedural methods of tip location since they are more accurate, more reliable and more cost-effective than post-procedural methods. Intracavitary electrocardiography and real time ultrasound can both be applied in the neonatal setting, but they offer different advantages or disadvantages depending on the type of central venous access device. Reviewing the evidence currently available about the use of these two methods in neonates, in terms of applicability, feasibility and accuracy, it can be concluded that (a) real time ultrasound is the only acceptable methodology for tip navigation for any central venous access device in neonates, (b) intracavitary electrocardiography is the preferred method of tip location for central catheters inserted by ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein or the brachiocephalic vein, and (c) real time ultrasound is the preferred method of tip location for umbilical venous catheters, epicutaneo-cava catheters, and central catheters inserted by ultrasound-guided cannulation of the common femoral vein.

Can the length of a catheter change the time to bubble at the tip performing the "Bubble Test"? A bench study.

Intraprocedural tip control techniques are critical during central venous catheter placement. According to international guidelines (INS 2021), intracavitary electrocardiography is the first method of choice to verify it; when this technique is not feasible, it is considered acceptable to use a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based tip location method, commonly known as "bubble-test" as an effective alternative. To assess whether the length of the vascular catheter can alter the time between the injection of the contrast media and its appearance at the catheter tip and the injection duration. Differences between operators stratified according to experience were evaluated as secondary endpoints. A bench study was conducted using an extracorporeal circuit. For each catheter length (60, 40, and 20 cm), three injections were obtained by each of the five operators with different levels of experience for a total of 45 measurements. Differences among operators were evaluated using ANOVA, and the impact of catheter length and operator expertise on times was assessed using repeated measurement models. Hub-to-tip times of 247.33 ms (SD 168.82), 166 ms (SD 95.46), 138 ms (SD 54.48), and injection duration of 1620 ms (SD 748.58), 1614 ms (SD 570.95), 1566 ms (SD 302.83) were observed for 60, 40, 20 cm catheter length, respectively. A significant time variability between operators was observed. Moreover, moving from 60 to 20 cm, hub-to-tip time was significantly longer for 60 cm devices (p = 0.0124), while little differences were observed for injection duration. Catheter length can change both the time between the injection of the contrast media and its appearance at the catheter tip and the injection duration. Hub-to-tip times obtained with 20 and 40 cm and overall injection duration did not differ significantly; skilled personnel could substantially reduce both values analyzed in this study.

Intracavitary electrocardiography for peripherally inserted central catheters tip location and nursing for a patient with persistent atrial fibrillation and acute left heart failure

Intracavitary electrocardiography for peripherally inserted central catheters tip location and nursing for a patient with persistent atrial fibrillation and acute left heart failure

Impact of distance of the catheter tip from cavo-atrial junction on bubble test (delay) time: A prospective study.

Correct tip positioning is a critical aspect in central vascular access devices insertion. The verification of positioning at the cavo-atrial junction is usually performed by intracavitary electrocardiography. Recently, echocardiographic techniques were proposed, including the direct visualization of the catheter or the visualization of a saline/air bolus (i.e. "bubble test"). As for the latter, a push-to-bubbles delay time below 2 s was proposed to indicate a correct positioning of the catheter tip. The aim of this study was to measure the variations of the push-to-bubbles time at increasing distance from the cavo-atrial junction, to verify if a cut-off of 1-2 s correspond to a well-positioned catheter. We performed a prospective study including patients with clinical indication of positioning a peripherally inserted central catheter. The catheter tip was positioned at the cavo-atrial junction (P0) via intracavitary electrocardiography, and the push-to-bubbles delay time was measured. The catheter was then retracted 5 cm (P1) and 10 cm (P2), and the test was repeated at this positioning. Push-to-bubbles time measurements were performed off-line by analyzing an audio/video recording which included the echography screen and the voice signal of the operator. Forty-nine patients were included. The average push-to-bubble time when the catheter tip was in the reference position was 0.41 ± 0.21 s. Retraction of the PICC catheter of 5 and 10 cm determined a significant increase of the push-to-bubbles time: mean time difference was +0.34 (95% IC 0.25-0.43, p < 0.001) s between P0 and P1 (5 cm distance), and +0.77 (95% IC 0.62-0.92, p < 0.001) s between P0 and P2 (10 cm distance). When the catheter was at the reference position (i.e. cavo-atrial junction) only 2.1% of bubbles delay times were above 1 s. The push-to-bubbles time is very low when the catheter tip is at the cavo-atrial junction. This delay increases progressively with increasing distance from the target. Push-to-bubbles delay time above 1 s might indicate a catheter not close to the cavo-atrial junction.

Applicability and feasibility of intraprocedural tip location of femorally inserted central catheters by transhepatic ultrasound visualization of the inferior vena cava in adult patients.

The ideal intraprocedural method for tip location during insertion of femorally inserted central catheters (FICCs) is still a matter of debate. When the catheter tip is meant to be in the right atrium or in the supradiaphragmatic inferior vena cava (IVC), tip location by either intracavitary electrocardiography or transthoracic echocardiography may be accurate and easy to perform. When the catheter tip is planned to be placed in the subdiaphragmatic IVC, fluoroscopy-though inaccurate and unsafe-has been regarded as the only option for intraprocedural tip location. We have investigated prospectively the applicability and feasibility of transhepatic ultrasound as intraprocedural method for assessing the location of the catheter tip in the subdiaphragmatic tract of IVC, during FICC insertion. We enrolled 169 consecutive patients undergoing FICC insertion by ultrasound guided puncture of the superficial femoral vein. In 165 out of 169 patients, the subdiaphragmatic IVC was visualized by the transhepatic ultrasound view. In all cases of IVC visualization, the catheter tip could be identified by ultrasound, either directly (direct evidence of the tip inside the vein) or indirectly (enhanced visualization of the tip after "bubble test"). There was no immediate or early complication, and very few late complications. The intraprocedural method of tip location of FICCs by transhepatic ultrasound was applicable in 97.6% of cases and feasible in 100%. When the position of the catheter tip is planned to be in the subdiaphragmatic IVC, this method of tip location is accurate, safe, and inexpensive, and should be considered as an alternative to fluoroscopy.

Clinical Case Reports 1976 - 79

In this paper five case reports were presented and include growth of hypoplastic right ventricle following pulmonary valvotomy, intracavitary electrocardiography in the diagnosis of Ebstein’s anomaly of the left atrioventricular valve in congenital corrected transposition of the great arteries, growth phenomenon as a cause of kinking of the right pulmonary artery in Waterston anastomosis, the usefulness of pulmonary vein wedge angiography in the visualization of an obstructed pulmonary artery, false aneurysm of the right pulmonary artery as a new complication of the Waterston anastomosis. For each case report, clinical, chest x-ray, electrocardiogram, angiogram, and other pertinent findings were presented. This was followed by discussion of etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options, as appropriate.

A retrospective two-center cohort study on the use of routine chest X-ray after peripherally inserted central catheter placement under ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography guidance.

The placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) has traditionally relied on measurements and anatomical landmarks. It involves post-placement chest X-rays (CXRs) and occasional repositioning, which incur additional direct and indirect costs, such as delays in care and staff time. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a routine post-procedural CXR in the era of ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG)-guided PICC insertion. A retrospective two-center study was conducted to review the clinical records of all patients who had PICCs in the Venous Access Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute and The Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital of Qingdao University between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2020. PICC placement was only available to patients who were 18 years or older, had in-sinus rhythm. The incidence of catheter misplacement after insertion was measured. Cavoatrial junction or the lower third of the superior vena cava (SVC) were defined as ideal catheter tip locations. A logistic regression analysis was performed to examine potential risk factors associated with PICC-related complications and a cost analysis was conducted to assess the economic impact of the use of CXR. There were 2,863 samples from 2,653 patients included. The overall incidence of intraprocedural and primary catheter misplacement was 7.3% (n=210) and 0.70% (n=20), respectively. There was a high risk of primary catheter misplacement when the left-arm was chosen for placement [odds ratio (OR): 11.163; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.720-33.495; P<0.001]. The overall cost of performing CXR for screening of PICC-related complications was $23,858 per year, and that of using CXR to diagnose 1 case of catheter misplacement was $1,789. This study confirms that misplacement of PICCs guided by ultrasound and IC-ECG is rare and that postprocedural CXR is very costly. In our setting, routine postprocedural CXR is unnecessary especially when the PICC is catheterized in the right arm, and is not a wise option.

Ultrasound versus intracavitary electrocardiography for intraprocedural tip location during central venous catheterization in infants and children: A prospective clinical study.

Both intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG) and ultrasound (US) have been proven to be safe and accurate for intraprocedural tip location during central venous catheterization, and both are known to be easily applicable and feasible in pediatric patients. Though, no prospective clinical study has directly compared the two methods as regards their applicability, feasibility, and procedural time. This study prospectively enrolled all children requiring a central venous access device in non-emergency situations, during a period of 1 year. All devices were inserted according to a well-defined insertion bundle including both IC-ECG and US-based tip location. The primary endpoint of the study was to compare the two methods in terms of applicability, feasibility and time required. This study included 100 consecutive central venous catheterizations in children of age ranging from 1 month to 18 years. The applicability of IC-ECG based tip location was 98% and its feasibility 100%; the time required for IC-ECG was 1.9 ± 2 min. The applicability of US-based tip location was 96% and its feasibility was 100%; the maneuver required 2.2 ± 3 min. US is an appropriate alternative method for intraprocedural tip location in children. The combined use of US and IC-ECG (both maneuvers being accurate, inexpensive, cost-effective, non-invasive, and equally fast to perform) should be recommended for tip location in pediatric patients, and it will avoid completely the use of fluoroscopy or of post-procedural x-ray.

ECG-Based Techniques to Optimize Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Rationale for Tip Positioning and Practical Use.

Intracavitary electrocardiography is an accurate guidance technique for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) tip location that is spreading widely among providers using non x-ray-based facilities. The principle behind this technology relies on the transmission of the electrocardiographic signal at the tip of the catheter and its use as an internal mobile electrode, allowing the system to identify the cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) through internal P-wave amplitude modulations. The gain in popularity of intracavitary electrography and its large diffusion have led manufacturers to offer various devices with heterogeneous properties, among which clinician who place PICCs have to choose. It is therefore important to understand differences between available techniques and devices. The potential impact might not only affect availability and costs but also the clinical impact through advantages and limitations regarding electric signal transmission PICC selection. Current perspectives on intracavitary electrocardiography will also be discussed, to give the reader a global view of the management of electrocardiographically guided PICCs, especially in an environment without x-ray support.

A randomised trial of intracavitary electrocardiography versus surface landmark measurement for central venous access device placement

Background: Malpositioned central venous access devices (CVADs) can lead to significant patient injury including central vein thrombosis and dysrhythmias. Intra-cavitary electrocardiography (IC ECG) has been recommended by peak professional bodies as an accurate alternative for bedside CVAD insertion, to reduce risk of malposition and allowing immediate use of the device. Our objective was to compare the effect of IC ECG on CVAD malposition compared to traditional institutional practice for CVAD placement. Methods: Randomised controlled trial of IC ECG CVAD insertion verses traditional CVAD insertion (surface landmark measurement with post insertion x ray). Patient recruitment was from December 2016 to July 2018. The setting was a 900-bed tertiary referral hospital based in South Western Sydney, Australia. Three hundred and forty-four adult patients requiring CVAD insertion for intravenous therapy, were enrolled and randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either IC-ECG ( n = 172) or traditional ( n = 172) CVAD insertion. Our primary outcome of interest was the rate of catheters not requiring repositioning after insertion (ready for use). Secondary outcomes were comparison of procedure time and cost. Results: Of the 172 patients allocated to the IC ECG method, 170 (99%) were ready for use immediately compared to 139 of the 172 (81%) in the traditional insertion group (difference, 95% confidence interval (CI): 18%, 11.9–24.1%). The total procedure time was mean 15 min (SD 8 min) for IC ECG and mean 36 min (SD 17 min) for traditional CVAD insertion (difference–19.9 min (95% CI–14.6 to −34.4). IC ECG guided CVAD insertion had a cost reduction of AUD $62.00 per procedure. Conclusions: Using IC-ECG resulted in nearly no requirement for post-insertion repositioning of CVADs resulting in savings in time and cost and virtually eliminating the need for radiographic confirmation. Trial registration: This trial is registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.anzctr.org.au ). The registration number is ACTRN12620000919910.

The intracavitary ECG method for tip location of ultrasound-guided centrally inserted central catheter in neonates

The correct position of the tip of a central venous access device is important in all patients, and especially in neonates. The traditional method of tip location (approximated intra-procedural length estimation + post procedural chest X-ray) is currently considered inaccurate and not cost-effective by most recent guidelines, which recommend the adoption of tip location by intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG) whenever possible. This study prospectively investigated the applicability, the feasibility, the accuracy, and the safety IC-ECG for tip location in neonates requiring insertion of ultrasound-guided centrally inserted central venous catheters (CICCs) with caliber 3Fr or more. All catheter tip locations were verified using simultaneously both IC-ECG and ultrasound-based tip location, using the Neo-ECHOTIP protocol. A total of 105 neonates were enrolled. The applicability of IC-ECG was 100% since a P wave was evident on the surface ECG of all neonates recruited for the study. The feasibility was also 100% since an increase of the P-wave was detected in all cases. The accuracy was also 100%, since a perfect match between IC-ECG based tip location and ultrasound-based tip location was found. There were no adverse events directly or indirectly related to the IC-ECG technique; no arrhythmias occurred. When applied to ultrasound guided CICCs, tip location by IC-ECG is applicable and feasible in neonates, and it is safe and accurate.

Intracavitary electrocardiography for femorally inserted central catheter tip location in adult patients.

BackgroundIn this study, the intracavitary electrocardiogram (ECG) P‐wave and QRS‐wave changes during femorally inserted central catheter (FICC) placement in adults were observed with the aim of reducing malposition occurrence. The observed method provides venous access in patients who have limited upper limb venous catheterization potential and require medium‐term and long‐term infusions.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 34 adult patients who underwent FICC placement was conducted. After body surface measurements were taken, all patients were connected to an ECG during catheter placement, and the P‐wave and QRS‐wave changes were observed. Next, the catheter tip position was confirmed with an abdominal X‐ray, and an analysis of the changes occurring during the procedure was conducted.ResultsIn the 34 patients included in the present study, the catheter tips were located below the diaphragm level in the inferior vena cava. Of the patients, 18 showed negative P waves, biphasic P waves, and positive high‐amplitude P waves with increasing the insertion depth. In 16 patients, no P‐wave characteristic changes were observed during catheterization, and an abdominal X‐ray confirmed that the catheter tip was positioned below the level of the first lumbar vertebra.ConclusionNegative P waves, biphasic P waves, and positive high‐amplitude P waves appeared during FICC placement in adults. Catheter withdrawal until the P wave reverted to normal indicated that a tip position close to the inferior vena cava above the diaphragm level was ideal.

Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness of Intracavitary Electrocardiography-Guided Catheter Tip Placement for Totally Implantable Venous Access Port

Intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG) has been extensively used for locating the catheter tip of the central venous access devices (CVADs) with favorable safety and accuracy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of IC-ECG-guided catheter tip placement for totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) by comparing with the standard fluoroscopy method. A total of 231 patients who underwent TIVAP implantation from September 2019 to April 2021 were enrolled in the retrospective study. Fluoroscopy and IC-ECG were conducted intraoperatively to confirm the position of catheter tips. Demographic characteristics, surgical data, the catheter tip position, complication rate, and incidence, cost of procedures, and indwelling time were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the risk factors of TIVAP-related complications. There was no significance between the fluoroscopy group and the IC-ECG group in terms of the rate of ideal position (P=0.733). Nine patients (3.9%) developed TIVAP-related complications. Complication rates and incidence were similar in the fluoroscopy group and the IC-ECG group (3.1% and 0.114/1000 catheter days vs. 4.4% and 0.105/1000 catheter days). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that there was no significant difference in indwelling time between the 2 groups (Log Rank P=0.634). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI) was an independent risk factor for TIVAP-related complications (OR=1.334, 95%CI: 1.139 - 1.563, P < 0.001). The IC-ECG group was less costly than the fluoroscopy group (¥9928 ± 362 vs. ¥11762 ± 431, P < 0.001). IC-ECG-guided catheter tip placement for TIVAP is feasible, safe, and cost-effective, with high accuracy, low risk of complications, and lower cost. It may be considered as an alternative to the standard fluoroscopy method for catheter tip placement of TIVAP.

A clinical study on the tip localization of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) guided by intracavitary electrocardiography in newborns: a randomised trial.

BackgroundThe present study aimed to investigate the P-wave changes in intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG) during catheterization with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in order to provide guidance for the accurate localization of the tip of the PICC.MethodsA total of 106 newborns who needed a PICC were randomly divided into two groups—a study group and a control group—using a random number table, with 53 cases in each group. In the study group, the ECG monitor was connected after the successful puncture and insertion of the PICC into the right sternoclavicular joint, and the position of the catheter tip was determined according to the P-wave changes on the IC-ECG. Localization X-rays were taken at the same time. In the control group, after the successful routine puncture and insertion of the PICC into the location to a predetermined length, localization X-rays were taken. The accuracy, procedure duration, and cost of the two localization methods were evaluated.ResultsThe accuracy of the localization in the study group was 92.5%, but the difference was not significant when compared with the control group (P>0.05). The duration of the procedure in the study group was 5.12±1.57 minutes, and the cost was 7.12±0.56 yuan, both of which were significantly different when compared with the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionsP-wave changes during IC-ECG have high accuracy in determining the location of the tip of the PICC. It is also a simple method and has certain clinical application value.Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (number: ChiCTR2100047660).

Interference of a ventricular assist device with magnetic navigation during insertion of Sherlock 3CG™, a bedside peripherally inserted central catheter.

Recently, the Sherlock 3CG™ Tip Confirmation System, including a magnetic tracking system and an intracavitary electrocardiography guidance system, has been introduced for bedside peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion. Magnetic field sources interfere with the magnetic tracking system. Electromagnetic interference of the ventricular assist device (VAD) has already been reported with various devices but not on Sherlock 3CG™. We assessed the availability of the magnetic tracking system in patients with and without a VAD during Sherlock 3CG™ insertion and evaluated the rate of optimal PICC tip position. We retrospectively reviewed 99 patients who had undergone PICC insertion using Sherlock 3CG™ on the bedside at our institutional intensive care unit from February 2018 to December 2020. Patients were divided into groups with and without a VAD. The availability of magnetic navigation and the success rate of optimal catheter tip position in each group were assessed. Among 87 cases analyzed, there were 12 and 75 cases with a VAD and without a VAD, respectively. The availability of magnetic navigation during Sherlock 3CG™ insertion was significantly lower in the group with a VAD [4/12 (33%) with VAD vs. 72/75 (96%) without VAD, P < 0.001]. In addition, the rate of optimal PICC tip position was also significantly lower in the group with a VAD [6/12 (50%) vs. 63/75 (84%), P = 0.015] The VAD significantly led to magnetic tracking system failure due to its electromagnetic interference during Sherlock 3CG™ insertion and significantly reduced the success rate of PICC insertions in the optimal position.

Chest-to-arm tunneling: A novel technique for medium/long term venous access devices.

Chest-to-arm (CTA) tunneling has been described recently as a technique that allows an optimal exit site at mid-arm even in chronically ill patients with complex clinical issues and challenging problems of vascular access. We adopted CTA tunneling in oncologic and in non-oncologic patients, in totally implanted and in external devices, for both medium and long-term intravenous treatments. We report our experience with 60 cases of CTA tunneling: 19 patients requiring a totally implantable device, who had bilateral contraindication to venous access at the arm and bilateral contraindication to placement of the pocket in the infra-clavicular area; 41 patients requiring an external central venous catheter, who had bilateral contraindication to insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters or femoral catheters, as well as contraindication to an exit site in the infraclavicular area. All venous access devices were inserted with ultrasound guidance and tip location by intracavitary electrocardiography, under local anesthesia. There were no immediate or early complications. Patients with CTA-ports had no late complications. In patients with CTA-tunneled external catheters, there were two dislodgments, four episodes of central line associated blood stream infections, and one local infection. There were no episodes of venous thrombosis or catheter malfunction. Our experience suggests that CTA tunneling is a safe maneuver, with very low risk of complications, and should be considered as an option in patients with complex venous access.

Study on the Safety and Accuracy of Intracavitary Electrocardiography and Ultrasound in the Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter tip positioning of Breast Cancer Patients

This study aims to explore the safety and accuracy of the intracavitary electrocardiography and ultrasound in the peripherally inserted central venous catheter tip positioning of breast cancer patients. A total of 176 breast cancer patients who were treated in the breast surgery department of our hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were selected. They were randomly divided into the Electrocardiogram-UI group (n=88) and the control group (n=88). In the Electrocardiogram-UI group, the peripherally inserted central venous catheter tip positioning was under the guidance of the bedside Electrocardiogram combined with ultrasound, while the peripherally inserted central venous catheter insertion in the control group was performed by the traditional technology. The accuracy of peripherally inserted central venous catheter tip positioning, psychological state, anxiety, pain degree, and complications were compared between the two groups after surgery. The results showed that the positioning accuracy rate of the catheter tip in the Electrocardiogram-UI group was 99.40 %, while that in the control group was 92.10 %. In the control group, the accuracy rate of the catheter tip positioning in the 6th, 7th and 8th ribs was 20.30 %, 64.10 %, and 14.70 % respectively, while that in the Electrocardiogram-UI group was 32.20 %, 40.30 % and 19.60 % respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups. And 24 h before the catheter insertion, there was no significant difference in the anxiety scores between the two groups. However, 24 h after the catheter insertion, the anxiety and pain scores in the Electrocardiogram-UI group were significantly lower than that of the control group. In terms of the complications, in the first w, two patients in the Electrocardiogram-UI group had thrombosis, while four patients in the control group. No patients had the symptoms of the chest discomfort, arrhythmia, or infection in both groups. At the end of three and six mo, the incidence of thrombosis in the Electrocardiogram-UI group was significantly lower than that of the control group. The peripherally inserted central venous catheter tip positioning technology guided by Electrocardiogram combined with ultrasound is an ideal method for peripherally inserted central venous catheter insertion. It can improve the quality of life of the breast cancer patients and promote the prognosis of the breast cancer patients.

Intracavitary electrocardiography for tip location during central venous catheterization: A narrative review of 70 years of clinical studies.

Intracavitary electrocardiography is an accurate and non-invasive method for central venous access tip location. Using the catheter as a traveling intracavitary electrode, intracavitary electrocardiography is based on the increase in the detected amplitude of the P wave while approaching the cavoatrial junction. Despite having been adopted diffusely in clinical practice only in the last years, this method is not novel. In fact, it has first been described in the late 40s, during electrophysiological studies. After a long period of quiescence, it is in the last two decades of the XX century that intracavitary electrocardiography became popular as an effective mean of central venous catheters tip location. But the golden age of this technique began with the new millennium, as documented by high-quality studies in this period. In fact, in those years, intracavitary electrocardiography has been studied broadly, and important achievements in terms of comprehension of the technique, accuracy, and feasibility of the method in different populations and conditions (i.e. pediatrics, renal patients, atrial fibrillation) have been gained. In this review, we describe the technique, its history, and its current perspectives.

Intracavitary electrocardiography-guided positioning of central vascular access device can spare unnecessary ionizing radiation exposure in pediatric patients.

Most hospital protocols-including those of our own institute-require the use of radiography to validate tip position in every central vascular access device placement. This study evaluated whether unnecessary ionizing radiation exposure could be spared in the pediatric population when intracavitary electrocardiography is used to guide catheter placement. Retrospective study of intracavitary electrocardiography-guided central vascular access device placements in our pediatric surgery department between 2013 and 2018. We evaluated the operating time, success in positioning the catheter, and accuracy of final tip position. We also assayed the effects of catheter type and of catheter access point on operating time, success, accuracy, and complications. We applied the chi-square test for statistical analysis. In total, 622 interventions of central vascular access device placements were evaluated; 340 intracavitary electrocardiography-guided central vascular access device placements were included in the study. The electrocardiography method successfully positioned the tip of the catheter in 316/340 (92.94%) of placements. Where intracavitary electrocardiography placement was successful, radiography confirmed accuracy of tip position in 314/316 (99.41%) of placements. When electrocardiography-guided positioning is uneventful and a valid P-Wave pattern is seen, postprocedure radiograph imaging for verification is unnecessary. Any effort should be made to upgrade hospital policies according to evidences and newest guidelines to spare pediatric patients harmful exposure to radiation by limiting the use of radiography only to selected cases.