Intracameral Anesthesia Research Articles

Automated Capsular Decompression to Avoid Argentinian Flag Sign in Intumescent Cataract.

We describe an alternative automated technique that consists of simultaneous anterior capsule puncture and decompression of the capsular bag by using an insulin needle attached to the aspiration tubing of the phacoemulsification device to prevent the occurrence of the "Argentinian Flag sign" during capsulorhexis in intumescent cataract. Instituto de Olhos de Assis and Center of Specialties Hoftalmed, located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Prospective interventional study. Eighty-eight eyes of 88 patients with white or intumescent cataracts were included in this study. Routine clear cornea incision, capsule staining with trypan blue, intracameral anesthesia, and ophthalmic viscoelastic device were used before the procedure. A 26-gauge needle was connected to the phacoemulsification aspiration tubing using a double male Luer connector for irrigation, and aspiration was inserted into the anterior chamber through a new paracentesis incision with the bevel facing down. Immediately after insertion, automated aspiration of the liquefied cortex was performed to remove anterior intralenticular material and achieve capsular decompression. Compression of the nucleus with the needle tip was performed to remove any liquefied material trapped between the posterior surface of the nucleus and the posterior capsule. All surgeries were performed using the same phacoemulsification and parameters. The rate of complete continuous capsulorhexis was observed and noted. No complications were observed in any of the cases. A single-stage, continuous, and well-centered capsulorhexis was achieved in 100% of cases. We conclude that a simultaneous puncture and decompression of the capsular bag using an insulin needle attached to the aspiration tubing of the phacoemulsification machine effectively avoided the "Argentinian Flag sign" in intumescent cataract surgery.

Comparison between Topical vs Topical Plus Intracameral Anesthesia in Phacoemulsification

Comparison between Topical vs Topical Plus Intracameral Anesthesia in Phacoemulsification

Pain experience in patients undergoing topical anesthesia alone versus topical plus intracameral anesthesia during cataract surgery.

To evaluate and compare the pain experience and discomfort during cataract surgery and over the 24 hours after surgery in patients undergoing either topical anesthesia alone or topical anesthesia plus intracameral anesthesia, provided by using a standard topical anesthesia regimen and a 0.2-mL dose of Mydrane®. Prospective study involving 100 patients who underwent cataract surgery receiving either topical anesthesia alone (group 1, n = 50) or topical anesthesia plus intracameral anesthesia (group 2, n = 50) between January 2021 and March 2022. The pain experienced by patients during and after surgery was assessed using a pain scale and a questionnaire. One hour after surgery, patients were asked to rate the intensity of discomfort they experienced throughout the procedure by pointing to a 0-100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). According to VAS measurements, patients who underwent surgery under topical anesthesia reported more significant pain than those who underwent surgery under topical anesthesia plus intracameral anesthesia during and over the 24 hours after surgery. (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Patients undergoing topical anesthesia had 2.34-fold greater odds of having pain during surgery [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.58-5.25, p = 0.03]. Topical anesthesia plus intracameral anesthesia lower intraoperative and postoperative pain levels, improving patient cooperation and representing a useful analgesic delivery method in cataract surgery.

The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database Study of Cataract Surgery: Report 12, Risk factors for suprachoroidal haemorrhage during cataract surgery.

To establish the incidence of acute intraoperative suprachoroidal haemorrhage (AISH) during cataract surgery and identify the risk factors for this complication. Data from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database was analysed. During the 11-year study period, from 01/04/2010 to 31/03/2021, 709 083 operations performed on 498 170 patients from 65 centres were eligible for inclusion. AISH occurred in 0.03% (204/709 083, approximately 1 in 3 500) of eligible cataract operations performed during the study period. Posterior capsule rupture was the risk factor most strongly associated with AISH (OR: 17.6, 95% CI: 12.4-24.9, p < 0.001). Other ocular risk factors identified were raised intraocular pressure (IOP) preoperatively (OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 2.5-5.5, p < 0.001), glaucoma (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4, p = 0.004). Risk increased with age and patients aged over 90 years were at greatest risk (OR: 6.7, 95% CI: 3.5-12.8, p < 0.001). The addition of intracameral anaesthetic when performing surgery under topical anaesthetic appears to be protective (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8, p = 0.003), compared to topical anaesthetic alone. There was a 16-fold increase in the incidence of vision loss when AISH occurred. The risk of AISH during modern cataract surgery is approximately 1 in 3 500 and is associated with a significant increase in the risk of vision loss should it occur. Posterior capsule rupture is the risk factor most strongly associated with AISH. Preoperative IOP control is a modifiable risk factor. The use of intracameral anaesthesia may reduce the risk of AISH.

Using Alprazolam before phacoemulsification cataract surgery reduces complications and duration of the surgery.

To evaluate the effect of preoperative Alprazolam on complications of phacoemulsification cataract surgery, duration of surgery and early reoperation rate. Records of 1026 eyes of 1026 consecutive patients underwent phacoemulsification with topical and intracameral anesthesia between 2016 and 2020years were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups, with or without using Alprazolam before surgery. Patients with planned first-time surgery for senile cataract and at least three months follow-up postoperatively were included. Those who had pseudoexfoliation, small pupil, zonular weakness, corneal and hearing problem as well as traumatic, brown, mature, hypermature, and posterior polar cataracts were excluded. Main outcome measures were duration of surgery, posterior capsule rupture, rapid posterior capsule opacification (PCO) formation requiring the neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser and reoperation rate in early postoperative periods. Alprazolam and control groups included 490 and 536 eyes, respectively. Mean surgical time was shorter in Alprazolam group (10.2 ± 3 versus 12.2 ± 4min; < 0.001). Rate of posterior capsule rupture was higher in control group (4 versus 15 eyes; = 0.02). Four eyes (0.8%) in control group underwent unplanned secondary surgical procedures in early postoperative period (P = 0.126). Rate of rapid PCO formation was higher in control group (1 versus 9 eyes; = 0.027). Using Alprazolam before phacoemulsification can lead to less posterior capsule rupture, short operation time and prevent repetitive surgery. It also reduces rapid PCO formation and, thus, early Nd:YAG laser intervention due to better cleaning the posterior capsule during surgery. We conclude that Alprazolam not only reduces intraoperative complications, but also facilitates their management.

Anesthesia techniques and the risk of complications as reflected in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery.

To determine the trends in anesthesia techniques for cataract surgery over the past decade and their relationship to surgical complications. Clinics affiliated with the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO). Retrospective cross-sectional register-based study. Variables include patient demographics, visual acuity, ocular comorbidities, surgery characteristics, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications for the study period from January 2008, to December 2018. The anesthesia methods registered in the EUREQUO and included in the study are topical, combined topical and intracameral, sub-Tenon, regional, and general anesthesia. Multivariate logistic regression models for each complication were constructed to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs. Complete data were available of 1 354 036 cataract surgeries. Topical anesthesia increased significantly over time (from 30% to 76%, P < .001). Sub-Tenon and regional anesthesia decreased (from 27% and 38% to 16% and 6%, respectively, P < .001), and general and combined topical and intracameral anesthesia remained stable (around 2%). Sub-Tenon (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.91, P < .001), regional (0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.78, P < .001), general (0.53; 95% CI, 0.50-0.56, P < .001), and intracameral anesthesia (0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90, P = .001) carried a significantly decreased risk of posterior capsule rupture (PCR), with and without dropped nucleus, compared with topical anesthesia. The risk of endophthalmitis was significantly lower with regional anesthesia compared with topical anesthesia (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.82, P = .001). The use of topical anesthesia for cataract surgery increased over time. Topical anesthesia is associated with an increased risk of PCR with and without dropped nucleus, and endophthalmitis.

Preferred Surgical and Anesthesia Techniques for Cataract Surgery in Jordan.

PurposeTo study the current practices in Jordan regarding cataract surgical procedures and anesthesia trends for cataract surgery.MethodsA cross-sectional survey of members of the Jordanian Ophthalmology Society was conducted in October 2020. The questionnaire included questions about participants’ demographics, the preferred surgical techniques for cataracts, the preferred anesthesia technique for cataract surgery, the factors which affect the choice of anesthesia technique, the use of sedation, who gives the anesthesia, if there is an anesthesia-trained person who observes the patient during cataract surgery, and the changing trends towards anesthesia between the surgeons.ResultsMore than half of the respondents (59.1%) had been in practice for more than 5 years. The preferred method for routine cataract was phacoemulsification for most participants (98.4%). For mature cataract, phacoemulsification was the preferred method for 61.4% of participants. More than half (55.1%) used topical with intracameral anesthesia for phacoemulsification. Two thirds of the participants (66.3%) performed retrobulbar anesthesia for extracapsular cataract surgery. In the majority of cases (86.6%), the respondent themself is the one who administers the anesthesia. No sedation was used before surgery in 62.6% of cases. Two thirds of the respondents (70.1%) reported that they had an anesthesia-trained person monitoring the patient during surgery. Patient cooperation was the most important factor (70.9%) affecting the surgeon’s choice of anesthesia technique followed by surgeon skill and experience (57.5%).ConclusionPresently, phacoemulsification is the preferred surgical technique for cataract in Jordan. Topical with intracameral anesthesia is the most common anesthesia for phacoemulsification while retrobulbar anesthesia is the most common for extracapsular cataract extraction.

Comparison of the effect of the intracameral lidocaine anesthesia and subconjunctival lidocaine anesthesia on the development of intraoperative floppy-iris syndrome in cataract surgery

Aim: To evaluate the effect of intracameral lidocaine anesthesia (ILA) and subconjunctival lidocaine anesthesia (SLA) administered during cataract surgery on the development and prevalence of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS). &#x0D; Material and Method: The study involved the medical records of 86 cataract patients having no risk factors other than small pupil size for IFIS whom ILA and/or SLA were applied during phacoemulsification surgery. While 45 patients were administered intracameral lidocaine anesthesia ILA (1%), 41 patients in the other group were administered subconjunctival lidocaine anesthesia (SLA) (2%). Floppy iris syndrome findings such as iris billowing, iris incarceration in the wound site, or progressive myosis, if any, were recorded. The groups were compared in terms of the prevalence of IFIS development. &#x0D; Results: While IFIS ratio was 33.7% in the ILA group, it was 17.1% in the SLA group (p=0.084). Patients with smaller pupil diameter observed a higher IFIS rate ( when pupil diameter threshold value was 6.5 mm p=0.011 and 6 mm p=0.009).&#x0D; Conclusion: During cataract surgery, surgeons should care for the development of IFIS in patients with small pupil diameters. However, the effect of intracameral lidocaine use on the development of IFIS has not been determined.

Use of Simultaneous Bilateral Cataract Surgery (SBCS) to Optimize Parameters Affecting the Subjective Perception of the Procedure.

Introduction Simultaneous Bilateral Cataract Surgery (SBCS) is still a relatively controversial procedure. The main objection is the risk of bilateral endophthalmitis or bilateral refractive error. However, SBCS has also some advantages (faster visual rehabilitation, lower risk of nosocomial infection, and lower cost). Performing surgery on both eyes in one session has one additional advantage which has not yet been described in the literature (according to the information available to authors). It allows surgeons to distinguish the effect of minor differences in the surgical protocol on the subjective perception of the procedure more accurately, which is a more suitable method than comparing two independent groups of patients. Purpose To compare the effect of minor changes in the surgical protocol during SBCS on intraindividual subjective perception of surgery (pain, pressure, glare, and perception of the duration of the surgery). Methods During the surgery of the right and left eyes of one patient, we randomly changed one surgical parameter (use of intracameral anesthesia, light intensity of the operating microscope, type of eyelid speculum, creation of the posterior circular capsulorhexis, and communication with the patient during surgery). Patients immediately after both surgeries subjectively evaluated the perception of pain (on the scale 0–10), pressure, and glare (on the scale 0–5) and estimated the duration of the surgery, separately for each eye. Each change was evaluated in a group of 50 patients. Results In the control group with no parameters changed, we noted no difference in subjective perception of the first and second surgery. In subgroups, where we changed the protocol, we detected only minor differences in subjective perception of pain, pressure, glare, and duration of the surgery. Only one statistically significant difference in subjective pain perception was in the subgroup where we used eye intracameral anesthesia (0.34 eyes with intracameral anesthesia, 0.44 eyes with only topical anesthesia). We did not note any statistically significant differences in the perception of the time of surgery. Conclusion SBCS can be used to optimize the parameters of cataract surgery. In our study, we noted a positive effect of intracameral anesthesia on subjective perception of surgery.

Topical anaesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine versus topical anaesthesia alone for phacoemulsification cataract surgery in adults.

Topical anaesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine versus topical anaesthesia alone for phacoemulsification cataract surgery in adults.

Analgetic Effect of Two Solutions of Intracameral Anesthesia During Cataract Surgery in Patients

Analgetic Effect of Two Solutions of Intracameral Anesthesia During Cataract Surgery in Patients

The Malaysian cataract surgery registry: incidence and risk factors of postoperative infectious endophthalmitis over a 7-year period.

To report the incidence, risk factors and visual outcomes for postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) based on 7-year data from the Malaysian Ministry of Health Cataract Surgery Registry (MOH CSR). Data was collected from the web-based MOH CSR. All consecutive cataract surgery patients from 1st June 2008 to 31st December 2014 were identified. Exclusion criteria were traumatic cataract or previous ocular surgery. Demographic data, ocular co-morbidities, intraoperative details and postoperative visual acuity (VA) at final ophthalmological follow-up were noted. All eyes were taken for analysis. Subjects with POE were compared against subjects with no POE for risk factor assessment using multiple logistic regressions. A total of 163 503 subjects were screened. The incidence of POE was 0.08% (131/163 503). Demographic POE risk factors included male gender (OR: 2.121, 95%CI: 1.464-3.015) and renal disease (OR: 2.867, 95%CI: 1.503-5.467). POE risk increased with secondary causes of cataract (OR: 3.562, 95%CI: 1.740-7.288), uveitis (OR: 11.663, 95%CI: 4.292-31.693) and diabetic retinopathy (OR: 1.720, 95%CI: 1.078-2.744). Intraoperative factors reducing POE were shorter surgical time (OR: 2.114, 95%CI: 1.473-3.032), topical or intracameral anaesthesia (OR: 1.823, 95%CI: 1.278-2.602), posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL; OR: 4.992, 95%CI: 2.689-9.266) and foldable IOL (OR: 2.276, 95%CI: 1.498-3.457). POE risk increased with posterior capsule rupture (OR: 3.773, 95%CI: 1.915-7.432) and vitreous loss (OR: 3.907, 95%CI: 1.720-8.873). Postoperative VA of 6/12 or better was achieved in 15.27% (20/131) subjects with POE. This study concurs with other studies regarding POE risk factors. Further strengthening of MOH CSR data collection process will enable deeper analysis and optimization of POE treatment.

Face-to-face upright seated positioning for cataract surgery in patients unable to lie flat: Case series of 240 consecutive phacoemulsifications

To present a case series of patients who were unable to lie flat for cataract surgery. University teaching hospital, district hospital, and private practice, Norwich, United Kingdom. Prospective case series. All patients had phacoemulsification using face-to-face upright seated positioning. The patient sits upright or semi-recumbent, and the surgeon sits or stands, facing the patient. The microscope is rotated forward, and surgery is done via an incision in the lower half of the cornea, using topical intracameral anesthesia. All 240 face-to-face cases, performed by the same surgeon, were prospectively recorded. The database included reasons for positioning difficulty, position adopted, and per-operative complications. Data on full systemic monitoring of 34 patients and satisfaction data on 90 patients were also recorded. In 13years, 240 eyes (179 patients) had face-to-face surgery. Common diagnoses were severe kyphosis, orthopnea, or both. No patient was refused face-to-face surgery since the service was started. The rate of vitreous loss was 12 (5%) of 240 cases. However, all patients (100%) received a posterior chamber intraocular lens. No patient had any systemic adverse event, and vital signs remained stable during surgery. All respondents stated that they would be happy to have face-to-face positioning again. Face-to-face positioning, in the hands of an experienced surgeon, was an acceptably safe approach for patients unable to lie flat for cataract surgery. It might be the only option for some patients. However, all patients should be counseled regarding the increased risk for operative complications.

Anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs during cataract surgery.

Patients undergoing cataract surgery are generally elderly, and many take drugs with systemic effects. The surgeon must be aware of the risks of continuing or discontinuing such medications perioperatively. Antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants, prescribed to reduce the incidence of thromboembolic events, are often used in this population. This paper aims to review the perioperative use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs in the setting of cataract surgery. Topical or intracameral anesthesia is preferred over anesthesia injected with needles. Aspirin can be safely continued in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Warfarin has been extensively studied, and the risk of hemorrhage associated with cataract surgery is low if the international normalized ratio is in the therapeutic range. Only a few studies of direct oral anticoagulants are available, and therefore no definite recommendations regarding those agents can be made at this time. Anesthesia in cataract surgery carries a low risk, even for patients taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs. The discontinuation of this class of drugs before cataract surgery may increase the risk of thromboembolism.

Trojan horse anaesthesia: A novel method of anaesthesia for pars plana vitrectomy.

CONTEXT:Topical anesthesia has been used for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with limited patient comfort. Thus, augmenting topical anesthesia with intracameral anesthesia (Trojan horse anesthesia) will provide pain-free experience during PPV.AIMS:This study was undertaken to evaluate the patient comfort and surgical safety using 2% lignocaine jelly augmented with intracameral 1.0% lignocaine solution for anesthetizing the eyes undergoing PPV.SETTINGS AND DESIGN:This was a prospective interventional case series at tertiary care hospital.SUBJECTS AND METHODS:Patients planned for PPV for indications other than retinal detachment were included in the study. The pain perception of the participants undergoing PPV under Trojan horse anesthesia was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS).STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED:Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics and nonparametric analysis with level of significance at P < 0.05.RESULTS:There were 114 eyes of 114 patients in the study out of which 68.4% (n = 78) were males. The mean age was 42.31 years (range 14–80 years, standard deviation [SD] 18.7). The mean surgical time was 34.0 min (range 13–80 min, SD 14.2). The pain perception on VAS scale averaged 3.0 (range 0–8, SD 1.59, median 3.0). Pain scores were not affected by the age (Pearson correlation = 0.098, P = 0.3), gender (P = 0.44), or the educational status of the participant (P = 0.28). The pain scores were not affected by the indications of surgery (P = 0.58) or the use of silicone oil (P = 0.07).CONCLUSIONS:Trojan horse anesthesia provides adequate analgesia for comfortable and safe 23-gauge PPV with high patient acceptability.

Sodium Ferulate Attenuates Lidocaine-Induced Corneal Endothelial Impairment.

The introduction of intracameral anaesthesia by injection of lidocaine has become popular in cataract surgery for its inherent potency, rapid onset, tissue penetration, and efficiency. However, intracameral lidocaine causes corneal thickening, opacification, and corneal endothelial cell loss. Herein, we investigated the effects of lidocaine combined with sodium ferulate, an antioxidant with antiapoptotic and anti-inflammatory properties, on lidocaine-induced damage of corneal endothelia with in vitro experiment of morphological changes and cell viability of cultured human corneal endothelial cells and in vivo investigation of corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness of cat eyes. Our finding indicates that sodium ferulate from 25 to 200 mg/L significantly reduced 2 g/L lidocaine-induced toxicity to human corneal endothelial cells, and 50 mg/L sodium ferulate recovered the damaged human corneal endothelial cells to normal growth status. Furthermore, 100 mg/L sodium ferulate significantly inhibited lidocaine-induced corneal endothelial cell loss and corneal thickening in cat eyes. In conclusion, sodium ferulate protects human corneal endothelial cells from lidocaine-induced cytotoxicity and attenuates corneal endothelial cell loss and central corneal thickening of cat eyes after intracameral injection with lidocaine. It is likely that the antioxidant effect of sodium ferulate reduces the cytotoxic and inflammatory corneal reaction during intracameral anaesthesia.

A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the level of patient pain during the phacoemulsification and implantation of foldable intraocular lenses while under topical, intracameral, or sub-Tenon lidocaine.Patients and methodsThis was a retrospective study. Three hundred and one eyes subjected to cataract surgery were included in this study. All eyes underwent phacoemulsification surgery and intraocular lens implantation using topical, sub-Tenon, or intracameral anesthesia. The topical group received 4% lidocaine drops, and the intracameral group received a 0.1–0.2 cc infusion of 1% preservative-free lidocaine into the anterior chamber through the side port combined with topical drops of lidocaine. The sub-Tenon group received 2% lidocaine. Best-corrected visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell loss, and intraoperative pain level were evaluated. Pain level was assessed on a visual analog scale (range 0–2).ResultsThere were no significant differences in visual outcome and corneal endothelial cell loss between the three groups. The mean pain score in the sub-Tenon group was significantly lower than that in the topical and intracameral groups (P=0.0009 and P=0.0055, respectively). In 250 eyes without high myopia (< −6D), there were no significant differences in mean pain score between the sub-Tenon and intracameral groups (P=0.1417). No additional anesthesia was required in all groups.ConclusionIntracameral lidocaine provides sufficient pain suppressive effects in eyes without high myopia, while sub-Tenon anesthesia is better for cataract surgery in eyes with high myopia.

Trabeculectomy Under Augmented Topical Anesthesia: Study on Pain Evaluation and Surgical Feasibility.

Performing trabeculectomy under topical anesthesia using lignocaine jelly with intracameral anesthesia may offer painless surgery with immediate visual gain and avoid the increase in intraocular pressure associated with locally injected anesthesia. In this context, we evaluated topical anesthesia using 2% lignocaine jelly with intracameral 1.0% lignocaine for trabeculectomy in terms of pain during surgery and the surgeon's experience. This was a tertiary care center-based interventional case series. Patients scheduled for trabeculectomy as the first surgery for medically controlled glaucoma underwent standard ab externo trabeculectomy under topical anesthesia. Pain evaluation was done using a visual analog scale with the modified Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, within 1 hour after surgery. Fifteen eyes of 14 patients were included in the study with a mean (SD, range) age of 61.3 (17.54, 40-90, distributed normally) years. Patients' pain score analysis showed a mean (SD, range) visual analog scale score of 0.73 (0.59, 0-2) on a scale of 0 to 10. The mean (SD, range) surgeon's satisfaction score was 3.2 (0.4, 3-4) on a scale of 3 to 9. The intraocular pressure of all patients was well controlled at 2 weeks [mean (SD, range), 9.2 (2.9, 4-16)] and at 4 weeks [mean (SD, range), 13.2 (1.2, 11-15)] postoperatively without any topical or systemic antiglaucoma medications. Trabeculectomy can be done under augmented topical anesthesia, which provides adequate analgesia for acceptable patient and surgeon comfort with favorable outcomes. Anesthesia provided by topical application of lignocaine 2% jelly and intracameral 1.0% lignocaine is sufficient for safe trabeculectomy surgery with acceptable discomfort to the patient.

Comparison between topical and peribulbar anesthesia experienced by patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery

Topical anesthesia has steadily gained popularity due to speed and ease of administration, rapid visual recovery postoperatively and the lack of block-related complications. In this investigation, we attempted to study patient satisfaction subjectively in individuals who underwent phacoemulsification under either topical anaesthesia (augmented by intracameral anaesthesia) or peribulbar block. In our study, patients aged 50–70 years scheduled for phacoemulsification for cataract surgery were enrolled. The study cohort was comprised of 80 patients. Patients were scheduled to undergo phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia or peribulbar block. Patient satisfaction was assessed by one research assistant only, using the Iowa Satisfaction in Anesthesia Scale (ISAS). The Student's t-test was used to determine the significance of IOWA score in both groups. The statistical analysis was performed in SPSS Software. Results of the ISAS indicated that there was no difference in satisfaction level with peribulbar anesthesia (was not statistically significant P=0.07) compared to topical anesthesia. Satisfaction scores were studied in patients who underwent phacoemulsification under topical anaesthesia than those who were operated under peribulbar block. However this difference was not found to be statistically significant in our study. Topical anesthesia provides better patient satisfaction as peribulbar anesthesia during cataract surgery.

Cirugía manual de catarata con incisión pequeña bajo anestesia tópica/intracameral por residentes

ObjectiveEvaluating best corrected visual acuity, astigmatism induced by placing suture scleral in tunnel-corneal, intraoperative complications, postoperative immediate and delayed, of the manual small incision cataract surgery with topical and intracameral anesthesia by residents. Material and methodsStudy retrospective, cross-sectional, non-comparative, observational. Realized from March 2011 to February 2012, evaluating cataract cases black or white, operated by manual small incision cataract surgery technique with suture under topical anesthesia and intracameral, performed by a single surgeon third-year resident. ResultsWe included a total of 51 eyes with a mean follow up of 7.4 months. The intraoperative complications is 13.72%, 5.88% with posterior capsule ruptured. The best corrected visual acuity≥20/40 was 88.23%. The average induced surgical astigmatism was 0.70diopters, is≤80.39% to 0.50diopters. The 23.52% showed corneal stromal edema in the immediate postoperative period, posterior capsule opacity in the late postoperative 23.54%. ConclusionThe manual small incision cataract surgery topical/intracameral in black and white realized by residents provides visual results similar to those reported by phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract surgery with various anesthetic techniques, without changing the rate of complications. The surgical astigmatism induced by placing sutures is similar to that reported when not used.