Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis Research Articles

Vessel wall MRI characteristics associated with intraprocedural stent thrombosis during angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis

BackgroundFew studies have so far explored plaque characteristics on high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) associated with intraprocedural stent thrombosis (IPST) during angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). We...

Usefulness of a Perfusion Balloon for Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis in a Patient With ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock

Intraprocedural stent thrombosis is a rare but serious complication of reperfusion therapy for acute coronary syndrome. There is currently no consensus on the intraprocedural management of intraprocedural stent thrombosis. It is difficult to attain thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3, particularly in cases of cardiogenic shock. A 49-year-old man who presented with anterior ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention to diffuse proximal lesions in the left anterior descending artery under the support of intra-aortic balloon pumping. Intraprocedural stent thrombosis occurred following the postdilations with a 3.5- × 38-mm everolimus-eluting stent. Despite administration of argatroban and nitroprusside, and after frequent balloon inflations using 3.5-mm noncompliant balloons and thrombectomy, the no-reflow phenomenon was repetitively established. However, after brief and prolonged balloon inflations using 3.5- and 3-mm Ryusei perfusion balloon catheters (Kaneka Medix), the diffusely protruded thrombus inside the stent regressed, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 was obtained. The final intravascular ultrasound image showed a well-suppressed, in-stent thrombus and 24% gain of stent area (from 7.5 to 9.3 mm2). A Ryusei perfusion balloon enabled frequent, long inflation times without deteriorating hemodynamics during reperfusion in ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock. Thus, extended balloon inflation using a perfusion balloon is deemed a viable option not only for intraprocedural stent thrombosis but also for cases with a high burden of thrombi during the primary stenting procedure for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Safety of intravenous cangrelor infusion during percutaneous coronary intervention in a real-world cohort of non-pretreated NSTEACS patients

Abstract Background and purpose Since publication of latest ESC guidelines in 2020, pretreatment with an oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (P2Y12i) is no longer systematically recommended in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) [1]. Therefore, from now on, NSTEACS patients will arrive to the cathlab to a larger extent without having a loading dose of an oral P2Y12i administered. Cangrelor, a potent intravenous P2Y12i, is an emerging option that provides a rapid onset of platelet inhibition, but it has not been widely used yet [2]. We aimed to evaluate safety of cangrelor real-world use in NSTEACS patients who had not received an oral P2Y12i before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods Development of periprocedural thrombotic complications, ischaemic and bleeding events at 30 days was retrospectively evaluated in a cohort of non-pretreated NSTEACS patients referred to PCI. Comparison among those who underwent intravenous infusion of cangrelor and those who received a loading dose of an oral P2Y12i (ticagrelor, prasugrel or clopidogrel) at the moment of PCI was performed. Results Between January and December of 2020, 155 non-pretreated NSTEACS patients were referred to our cathlab; of whom, 89 underwent PCI and were included in the analysis (18.0% with unstable angina, 82.0% with NSTEMI). Mean age was 66.0±14.3 years, 21 (23.6%) were female and the mean GRACE risk score was 112±34. PCI was performed ad-hoc (immediately after diagnostic catheterization) in 81 patients (91.0%), whereas 15 patients (16.9%) required PCI to be done in more than two times. Procedure was performed exclusively by radial or cubital artery access in 78 patients (87.6%). Regarding antiplatelet drug administration, cangrelor was used in 14 patients (15.7%), prasugrel in 35 (39.3%), ticagrelor in 29 (32.6%) and clopidogrel in 11 (12.4%). No significant differences were found among patients in terms of development of ischaemic events at 30 days (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or stent thrombosis) or periprocedural thrombotic events (no-reflow, bailout use of anti-IIb/IIIb or intraprocedural stent thrombosis). The use of cangrelor did not raise the incidence of bleeding events at 30 days (7.1% vs. 15.1%, p=0.682) [Table 1]. Cangrelor tended to be more frequently used in high-risk NSTEMI patients (20.8% vs. 12.9%, p=0.357) and in case of complex PCI (26.3% vs. 7.8%, p=0.018) [Figure 1]. After controlling by both variables, cangrelor did not significantly increase the risk of bleeding or ischaemic events at 30 days either. Conclusions Intravenous infusion of cangrelor during PCI in non-pretreated NSTEACS patients shows no differences in terms of thrombotic or bleeding events in comparison to the administration of a loading dose of an oral P2Y12i. Our results also suggest that cangrelor could be a safe option in patients with high thrombus burden who require complex PCI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Correction to: Clinical Impact of Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Treated With Potent P2Y12 inhibitors - a VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART Substudy.

Correction to: Clinical Impact of Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Treated With Potent P2Y12 inhibitors - a VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART Substudy.

INTRAPROCEDURAL STENT THROMBOSIS DURING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: HOW TO PREDICT

Background: Intraprocedural stent thrombosis (IPST) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an uncommon event that results in a poor outcome including STEMI and sudden cardiac death. Concerns about an increased risk of stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents (DES) continue, even though the incidence, timing, and predictors of stent thrombosis with DES have not been identified. Objective: This study aimed to describe the diagnosis and management of Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis. Case presentation: We will discuss a 49 year-old male brought to our hospital because of chest pain while doing moderate activity. One month prior to admission, he had history of acute coronary syndrome and 1 DES on right coronary artery was placed. Ticagrelor and aspirin were routinely consumed as dual antiplatelet therapy. The patient was diagnosed with intraprocedural stent thrombosis during PCI with the evidence of intra-catheter thrombosis and ST segment elevations seen in the ECG monitor. We treat the patient with Ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose and intracoronary unfractionated heparin (UFH) during procedure continued with continuous infusion until 24 hours. No event of subsequent acute coronary syndrome was observed. Conclusion: Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis was a strong predictor of mortality in STEMI patients. This case showed that the present widespread use of DES instead of BMS for coronary implantation although decreased the future risk of repeat revascularization, increased the risk of thrombosis. Prior risk stratification, potent early antiplatelet treatment and anticoagulant of choice with UFH might be used to reduce the risk of thrombosis in STEMI patients undergoing stent implantation.

Safety and efficacy of prophylactic tirofiban infusion for acute intracranial intraprocedural stent thrombosis

Periprocedural antithrombotic management with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) for intracranial artery stenting is still controversial. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of prophylactic tirofiban infusion for acute intracranial intraprocedural stent thrombosis in routine clinical practice. From January 2013 to December 2019, consecutive patients treated with endovascular stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) were identified and dichotomized by whether tirofiban was used. The efficacy and safety outcomes were compared by propensity score matching. A total of 160 consecutive patients in the tirofiban group and 177 patients in the non-tirofiban group were enrolled. Propensity score matching analysis selected 236 matched patients. One acute intraprocedural stent thrombosis (AIST) occurred in patients receiving prophylactic tirofiban, while 8 in the non-tirofiban group. The incidence of AIST in the tirofiban group was significantly lower than that in the non-tirofiban group (0.8% vs 6.8%, P = 0.039). The periprocedural ischemic events (8.5% vs 5.1%, P = 0.424), periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage (4.2% vs 0.8%, P = 0.219) and 30-day total mortality (3.4% vs 0%, P = 0.125) were not statistically different between the two groups. Compared with conventional stenting angioplasty without tirofiban, tirofiban prophylactic infusion can lower the incidence of AIST, without increasing the risk of periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage and 30-day total mortality. However, there is no superiority in reducing periprocedural ischemic events. The current study adds more important insights to the available clinical evidence on the use of tirofiban during stenting of ICAS.

Clinical Impact of Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Treated With Potent P2Y12 inhibitors - a VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART Substudy.

BackgroundThe clinical importance of intraprocedural stent thrombosis (IPST) during percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era of potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors is not established. The aim of this study was to assess IPST and its association with clinical outcome in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary antithrombotic medications.Methods and ResultsThe VALIDATE‐SWEDEHEART study (Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in ST‐Segment and Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients on Modern Antiplatelet Therapy in the Swedish Web System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence‐Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies Registry Trial) included 6006 patients with myocardial infarction, treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention. IPST, defined as a new or worsening thrombus related to a stent deployed during the procedure, was reported by the interventional cardiologist in 55 patients (0.9%) and was significantly associated with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction presentation, longer stents, bailout glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow <3. The primary composite end point included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, out‐of‐laboratory definite stent thrombosis and target vessel revascularization within 30 days. Secondary end points were major bleeding and the individual components of the primary composite end point. Patients with versus without IPST had significantly higher rates of the primary composite end point (20.0% versus 4.4%), including higher rates of cardiovascular death, target vessel revascularization, and definite stent thrombosis, but not myocardial infarction or major bleeding. By multivariable analysis, IPST was independently associated with the primary composite end point (hazard ratio, 3.82; 95% CI, 2.05–7.12; P<0.001).ConclusionsIPST is a rare but dangerous complication during percutaneous coronary intervention, independently associated with poor prognosis, even in the current era of potent antiplatelet agents. Future treatment studies are needed to reduce the rate of IPST and to improve the poor outcome among these patients.RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02311231.

Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of calcific coronary lesions in ST elevation myocardial infarction.

To describe the utility and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We performed a retrospective analysis, across six UK sites of all patients in whom IVL was used for coronary calcium modification of the culprit lesion during primary PCI for STEMI. The 72 patients were included. IVL was used in de-novo culprit lesions in 57 (79%) of cases and culprit in-stent restenoses in 11 (15%) of cases. In four cases (6%) it was used in a newly deployed stent when this was under-expanded due to inadequate calcium modification. Of the 30 cases in which intracoronary imaging was available for stent analysis, the average stent expansion was 104%. Intra-procedural stent thrombosis occurred in one case (1%), and no-reflow in three cases (4%). The 30 day MACE rates were 18%. IVL appears to be feasible and safe for use in the treatment of calcific coronary artery disease in the setting of STEMI.

Predictors of intra-procedural stent thrombosis (IPST) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): a pooled data analysis

Abstract Background Among all PCI related intraprocedural thrombotic events, IPST is rare but associated with worst outcomes. Purpose We conducted this study to identify specific patient and procedural characteristics that are associated with higher incidence of IPST. Methods Data on patient and procedural characteristics from all the studies comparing IPST without IPST was pooled for the purpose of analysis. Results 5 studies with a total of 21251 patients were included. IPST occurred in 170 patients (0.8%). History of a prior PCI (assumed to be on dual or single anti-platelet agent)was associated with decrease in IPST. IPST occurred more in smokers, patients with abnormal cardiac enzymes at presentation, presentation with STEMI. Incidence of IPST was significantly higher in interventions involving left main artery or bifurcation or with bare metal stent placement. A low pre-TIMI flow of 0 or 1, baseline thrombus, not using upstream GpIIb inhibitors also significantly increased incidence of IPST. Conclusion Further studies are needed to validate above described patient and procedural risk factors. Using upstream GpIIb inhibitors in this specific high-risk population may help in prevention. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Impact of intraprocedural stent thrombosis on outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background Intraprocedural stent thrombosis (IPST), defined as the development of occlusive or nonocclusive new thrombus in or adjacent to a recently implanted stent before completion of PCI. IPST even though a rare entity, yet is associated with worse prognosis amongst all intraprocedural thrombotic events. Purpose Data regarding the impact of IPST is scarce and needs further investigation. Methods We performed literature search of all published full-length articles that studied and compared data on patients with IPST and with no IPST during PCI. We calculated odds ratios via the random effects model for 30 day and 1 year outcomes. Results Our literature search yielded 3 studies (1 retrospective, 2 observational post-hoc analysis) relevant to the meta-analysis. Total 19272 patients were included. IPST occurred in 159 patients (0.8%). At 30 days, IPST was associated with statistically significant higher all-cause mortality (OR 10.79, 95% CI [6.31, 18.45] p&amp;lt;0.00001), MI (OR 4.82, 95% CI [2.39, 9.73] p&amp;lt;0.0001), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 6.70, 95% CI [3.38, 13.29] p&amp;lt;0.00001), definite stent thrombosis (OR 10.44, 95% CI [5.87, 18.58] p&amp;lt;0.00001), definite or probable stent thrombosis (OR 9.28), 95% CI [5.54, 15.56] p&amp;lt;0.00001) and death or MI or TVR (OR 7.20], 95% CI [4.10, 12.64] p&amp;lt;0.00001), than those without IPST. At one year, results remained statistically significant for higher mortality (OR 4.27, 95% CI [1.92, 9.49] p=0.0004) and death or MI or TVR (OR 2.91, 95% CI [1.58, 5.36] p=0.0006) in patients with IPST. Conclusions IPST even though is a rare occurrence, is associated with more adverse ischemic events, including higher mortality at 30 days and 1 year. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Flow diverter stents with hydrophilic polymer coating for the treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms using single antiplatelet therapy: Preliminary experience.

The use of flow diverter stent (FDS) has limitations in cases of subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by ruptured aneurysm, due to the need for double antiplatelet therapy and the delay in the aneurysm occluding. The p48 MW and the p64 MW (Phenox) are available with Hydrophilic Polymer Coating (HPC), that reduces the risk of thrombus formation. Purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of p48 and p64 MW HPC with single antiplatelet therapy for the acute treatment of ruptured aneurysm. We retrospectively evaluated all patients treated for acutely ruptured aneurysms with a p48 MW HPC or p64 MW HPC from October 2019 to April 2020 using single antiplatelet therapy. For each patient, we considered demographic and aneurysm-related data, clinical presentation, size and location of the implanted flow diverter stent, intra- and post-procedural complications, aneurysm occlusion. Seven patients were included. The ruptured aneurysms were four saccular, two blister-like and one dissecting, six in the anterior and one in posterior circulation. No intraprocedural stent thrombosis and rebleeding was observed. In two cases the aneurysm is completely excluded, in one patient it was found only neck perfusion, in three cases there were mild reduction of the sac and in one case there was a persistent perfusion. No patients needed retreatment in this series. In our experience, FDS HPC appears a potential treatment option in selected cases. Our study is limited by small population and short-term follow-up. We report our preliminary data, but further investigations are necessary.

Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban in Rescue Treatment for Acute Intracranial Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis.

Background and Purpose: The incidence of acute intraprocedural stent thrombosis (AIST) during stenting of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) has seldom been reported and evidence regarding the treatment of AIST is lacking. We aim to investigate the incidence of AIST during stenting of ICAS in our institute, assess the preliminary efficacy and safety of rescue treatment of tirofiban for these patients.Methods: From September 2016 to May 2019, all symptomatic ICAS patients who underwent intracranial stenting in our institute were prospectively registered into this study, of which patients with AIST were retrospectively reviewed to extract baseline characteristics, perioperative management, procedural details, angiographic, and clinical outcomes. Rescue treatment of tirofiban for AIST was assessed by recanalization of the culprit vessel and periprocedural death, hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke.Results: Acute intraprocedural stent thrombosis developed in 12 (6.2%) patients within 30 min after stent placement of 194 patients. All 12 cases were successfully recanalized with modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) 3 and Arterial Occlusive Lesion (AOL) 3 after rescue treatment of tirofiban alone. There was no perioperative death or any hemorrhagic complication. Three patients suffered perioperative ischemic stroke.Conclusions: We observed a non-negligible rate of AIST during intracranial stenting procedures for ICAS. Intra-arterial bolus followed by intravenous tirofiban infusion seems to be efficacious and safe for AIST during stent placement for ICAS, without increasing the rate of hemorrhagic complications and death.

Spontaneous Regression of Intraprocedural Carotid Stent Thrombosis Achieved Using Antiplatelet Agents

Acute thrombosis is an uncommon complication during carotid stent intervention.1 In some patients, an intraprocedural carotid stent thrombosis occurs immediately after stent deployment and can lead to a fatal iatrogenic stroke.2 A clear treatment plan to prevent further thrombus progression has not been established to date. We report a patient with successful regression of an intraprocedural carotid stent thrombus without clinical aggravation who received antiplatelet agents during and after intervention.

Value of CHA2DS2-VASc Score for Prediction and Ruling Out of Acute Stent Thrombosis After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Acute stent thrombosis is an important complication of stent implantation. The CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, previous stroke, vascular disease, age between 65 and 74 years, female gender) score incorporates important cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and predicts prognosis in various CV conditions. We evaluated the value of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting acute stent thrombosis (ie, thrombosis during 24 hours after stent placement) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention for ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction. Patients with intraprocedural stent thrombosis and complications were excluded; 48 (2.1%) of 2732 patients had acute stent thrombosis according to our definition. Median CHA2DS2-VASc score was significantly higher in this stent thrombosis group. Cumulative acute stent thrombosis rates were 0.51% for CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤1, 1.55% for ≤2, 1.80% for ≤3, 2.00% for ≤4, 2.17% for ≤5, and 2.19% for ≤6. The CHA2DS2-VASc score (odds ratio = 1.390, 95% confidence interval = 1.118-1.728; P = .003) was an independent predictor of acute stent thrombosis. The CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤1 predicted the absence of the acute stent thrombosis with 91% specificity and 36% sensitivity. Further studies are needed to establish the value of this finding in the context of current clinical practice.

Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis: Case Series of a Rare Complication Managed Successfully

Intra-procedural stent thrombosis (IPST) is defined as the development of occlusive or non-occlusive new thrombus in or adjacent to a recently implanted stent before the PCI procedure is completed. The frequency of occurrence currently ranges between 0.5 – 1.7% of all PCI procedures and it seems to be considerably reduced with newer drug eluting stents and improved techniques. The occurrence of IPST is relatively rare, even in ACS patients, and is related strongly to clinical presentation and procedural factors (e.g., anticoagulation regimen, lesion type, presence of thrombus at baseline, stent under expansion and edge dissection etc.) than to baseline demographic characteristics. Imaging modalities like IVUS or OCT can prevent as well as identify the underlying cause for IPST. IPST not only decreases success rate of PCI but is also associated with higher rates of slow flow or no reflow, distal embolization and side branch closure. It is also associated with higher mortality, myocardial infarction, ischemia driven revascularisation and stent thrombosis on follow up. IPST can be managed immediately in cath lab and involves use of GP2b3a inhibitors, optimising stent apposition by repeat balloon dilatation, use of imaging to identify the cause and accordingly corrective measures to be taken. Rarely emergency CABG may be required if underlying cause cannot be corrected. Prevention is the key. IPST can be prevented by using newer anti-platelets, use of GP2b3a inhibitors especially in presence of ACS or high thrombus load, preparing the lesion well before stenting, use of atherectomy devices when needed, appropriate stent size selection and use of imaging modalities in complex lesions to optimise stent selection and apposition. We describe three cases of the intra procedural stent thrombosis under different clinical scenarios and its management.

Simultaneous Massive Coronary Air Embolism and Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis

Massive coronary air embolism and intraprocedural stent thrombosis are a very infrequent but live-threatening complications of coronary interventions. The simultaneous occurrence of both have never been published yet. In this case report, 50-years-old male, with prior history of dyslipidemia is presented. Coronary air embolism is a rare complication of cardiac catheterization with a known incidence of 0.1% to 0.3% of all the procedures. This case exemplifies that the strategy of using directly a guiding catheter previous the contralateral diagnostic angiography if the EKG changes are manifest, is valid.

Case Report: INTRAPROCEDURAL STENT THROMBOSIS IN PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY

Stent thrombosis is a rare complication of PCI but associated with STEMI and sudden cardiac death. Intra procedural stent thrombosis (IPST) was defined new or increasing (compared with baseline) thrombus within or adjacent to a deployed stent occurring the index PCI procedure whether occlusive or nonocclusive. We describe a case with double vessel disease who has complication cardiac arrest and intra procedural stent thrombosis in LAD and Left Main coronary artery after deployed stent in bifurcation LAD-D1. Thrombectomy and rescucitation were performed, and the patient completed her hospital course without complications.

Usefulness of Intravascular Ultrasound for Predicting Risk of Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis

Intraprocedural stent thrombosis (IPST) is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention that leads to poor outcomes; however, the factors contributing to IPST remain largely unknown. Accordingly, we used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to examine the lesion characteristics in patients with IPST. We retrospectively analyzed 1,504 consecutive stent-implanted lesions in 1,324 patients (326 with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], 403 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome [NSTE-ACS], and 595 patients with stable angina). Of these, IPST occurred in 5 patients during percutaneous coronary intervention (0.4% per patient; 3 with STEMI, 2 with NSTE-ACS). The IVUS characteristics of plaques that developed IPST were compared with those of controls without the evidence of IPST (non-IPST; n= 15) who were matched by age, gender, lesion location, and clinical presentation (STEMI, NSTE-ACS, or stable angina). All 5 lesions that led to IPST had ruptured plaques with positive remodeling and attenuation. Plaque rupture was also observed in 40% of the non-IPST group. Multiple plaque ruptures in the culprit lesion were more common in the IPST group (80% vs 7%; p <0.01). The maximum cavity area was larger in the IPST group than in the non-IPST group having plaque rupture (4.6mm(2) [interquartile range, 4.3 to 6.5] vs 2.4mm(2) [1.8 to 2.9]; p <0.01). In conclusion, we found using IVUS that multiple plaque ruptures with larger cavities more often evolved into IPST.

Abstract 12148: Impact of Multiple Plaque Ruptures and Cavity Area on Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis: Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis

Objectives: We examined characteristics of lesions in cases of intraprocedural stent thrombosis (IPST) using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Background: IPST is a rare complication occurring during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that leads to poor outcomes. However, factors that contribute to IPST remain largely unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,504 consecutive stent-implanted lesions in 1,324 patients [326 with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 403 with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), and 595 with stable angina]. IVUS characteristics of plaques that led to IPST were compared with those of a matched control (non-IPST) group (n = 15) without evidence of IPST matched by age; gender; lesion location; or STEMI, NSTE-ACS, or stable angina. Positive remodeling was defined as a lesion greater than the mean reference external elastic membrane cross-sectional area. Continuous variables were displayed as median and 1st and 3rd interquartile range. Results: IPST occurred in 5 (0.4%; 3 with STEMI, 2 with NSTE-ACS) of 1,324 patients during PCI. Plaque burden at the minimum lumen area site was significantly greater in the IPST group than in the non-IPST group (93.0% vs. 87.9%, P = 0.0035). All 5 culprit lesions that led to IPST had ruptured plaques with positive remodeling and attenuation. The maximum cavity area was larger in the IPST group than in the non-IPST group (4.6 [4.3, 6.5] mm2 vs. 0 [0, 1.9] mm2, P = 0.0011), whereas plaque rupture was also observed in 40% of subjects in the non-IPST group. Multiple plaque ruptures in the culprit lesion were far more common in the IPST group (80.0% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.0049). Conclusion: Multiple plaque ruptures and a larger cavity area were associated with IPST occurrence. IVUS assessment may help predict the development of IPST during PCI.

Impact of intraprocedural thrombotic events on short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention. Evidence from a meta-analysis

BackgroundData regarding the effects of intraprocedural thrombotic events (IPTE) are scarce. Hence we aim to perform a meta-analysis to examine the outcomes of IPTE compared to non-IPTE during PCI. MethodsWe performed a literature search of all published full-length articles of studies that reported data on patients with IPTE compared with non-IPTE during PCI. We calculated odd ratios via random effects model. ResultsA total of 26,697 patients, of which 1572 patients had IPTE, were included in this analysis. In-hospital, IPTE was associated with higher mortality (odds ratio (OR) 5.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) [2.31, 12.41]; p<0.0001), myocardial infarction (MI) and major bleeding compared to non-IPTE. At 30days, IPTE was also associated with higher mortality (OR 4.57, 95% CI [2.43, 8.60]; p<0.0001), MI, repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis and major bleeding compared to non-IPTE group. IPTE was also associated with higher long-term mortality (OR 2.19, 95% CI [1.35, 3.53]; p=0.001). Among IPTE patients, intraprocedural stent thrombosis was associated with greater odds of MI compared to both no reflow and distal embolization events. ConclusionIPTE during PCI is associated with more adverse ischemic events, including mortality, during the index hospitalization, at 30days and long-term.