Intraoperative Fracture Research Articles

Indications, outcomes, and complications of orthopaedic implant removal: a prospective observational study

Background: Orthopaedic implant removal is a common procedure, but its indications and outcomes remain debated. This study aimed to examine the indications, outcomes, and complications of implant removal in a tertiary care center. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 66 patients undergoing implant removal between February 2022 and February 2024. Patient demographics, indications for removal, time to removal, and complications were recorded. Follow-ups were conducted at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-removal. Results: The study included 47 males and 19 females, with 74% adults and 26% paediatric patients. Pain was the most common indication for removal (42%), followed by elective removal (36%). Most implants (33%) were removed after 2 years. Complications were minimal, with 4.5% incomplete removals and 1.5% failure to remove. No intraoperative fractures or postoperative infections were observed. Patients generally reported improvement in symptoms or psychological well-being following implant removal. Conclusion: Implant removal should be approached selectively, with careful consideration of indications and potential complications. Pain relief and improved function were common outcomes, but risks such as incomplete removal should be considered. The study supports individualized decision-making in implant management, emphasizing the need for thorough preoperative planning and skilled surgical execution.

A SCOTTISH CENTRE'S EXPERIENCE OF RAPIDLY DESTRUCTIVE OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP IN THE SETTING OF A RESTRICTED ARTHROPLASTY SERVICE: DO DELAYS AFFECT OUTCOMES? WHAT CAN WE LEARN?

The Covid-19 pandemic restricted access to elective arthroplasty theatres. Consequently, there was a staggering rise in waiting times for patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA). Concomitantly, rapidly destructive osteoarthritis (RDOA) incidence also increased.Two cohorts of patients were reviewed: patients undergoing primary THA, pre-pandemic (December 2017-December 2018) and patients with RDOA (ascertained by dual consultant review of pre-operative radiographs) undergoing THA after the pandemic started (March 2020 – March 2022). There were 236 primary THA cases in the pre-pandemic cohort. Out of the 632 primary THA cases post-pandemic, 186 cases (29%) had RDOA. Within this RDOA cohort, the pre-operative mean OHS, EQ5D3L and EQVAS (12.7, 10.5 and 57.6 respectively) were all poorer than in the pre-pandemic population (18.3, 9.4 and 66.7 respectively) (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the RDOA and pre-pandemic cohort in Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) at 12 months, perhaps due to their ceiling effect.Within the RDOA cohort, 7 cases required acetabular augments, 1 of which also required femoral shortening. The rate of intra-operative fracture, dislocation, infection, return to theatre, and revision were 2.2%, 2.7%, 4.3%, 3.8% and 2.2% respectively, greater than those reported in the literature. No fractures nor dislocations occurred in robot assisted arthroplasties.With ever increasing waiting lists, RDOA prevalence will continue to rise. Increased surgical challenges and potential use of additional implants generated by its presence excludes these patients from waiting list initiative pathways, potentiating the complexity of the operative procedure. Going forwards, the economic burden and training implications must be considered.

Accuracy of robotic arm-assisted versus computed tomography-based navigation in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach: a retrospective study

BackgroundA robotic arm-assisted and a computed tomography (CT)- based navigation system have been reported to improve the accuracy of component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has compared robotic arm-assisted THA (rTHA) to CT-based navigated THA (nTHA) concerning accuracy of cup placement and acetabular fractures using the direct anterior approach (DAA). This study aimed to compare the accuracy of cup placement and the presence of intraoperative acetabular fractures between rTHA and nTHA using DAA in the supine position.MethodsWe retrospectively investigated 209 hips of 188 patients who underwent rTHA or nTHA using DAA (rTHA using the Mako system: 85 hips of 79 patients; nTHA: 124 hips of 109 patients). After propensity score matching for age and sex, each group consisted of 73 hips. We evaluated clinical and radiographic outcomes, comparing postoperative cup orientation and position, measured using a three-dimensional templating software, to preoperative CT planning. Additionally, we investigated the prevalence of occult acetabular fracture.ResultsClinical outcomes were not significantly different between the groups at 1 year postoperatively. The mean absolute error of cup orientation was significantly smaller in the rTHA group than in nTHA (inclination: 1.4° ± 1.2° vs. 2.7° ± 2.2°, respectively; p = 0.0001, anteversion: 1.5° ± 1.3° vs. 2.2° ± 1.7°, respectively; p = 0.007). The cases within an absolute error of 5 degrees in both RI and RA were significantly higher in the rTHA (97.3%) than in nTHA group (82.2%) (p = 0.003). The absolute error of the cup position was not significantly different between the two groups. The prevalence of occult acetabular fracture did not differ significantly between the two groups (rTHA: n = 0 [0%] vs. nTHA: n = 1 [1.4%]).ConclusionCup placement using DAA in the supine position in rTHA was more accurate with fewer outliers compared to nTHA. Therefore, rTHA performed via DAA in a supine position would be useful for accurate cup placement.

Complications after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Korean Population: A Single Center Study of 299 Cases

BackgroundKnowledge regarding differences in the order of frequency of complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) between Asian and Western populations is limited. We therefore asked for (1) What is the order of frequency of complications after primary RTSA in the Korean population? (2) What are the rates of complication, reoperation, and revision, and clinical outcomes after index surgery? MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the 299 consecutive cases who underwent primary RTSA with more than 1 year of follow-up over a period of 12 years. The mean age of the patients was 73.4 years (range, 58-88 years) and the mean follow-up period was 3.8 years (range, 1-11.5 years). Evaluation of the clinical outcomes, complications, and reinterventions was performed at the final follow-up. ResultsThe mean VAS pain score, UCLA score, ASES score, and SSV improved from 6.7, 10.2, 30.7, and 27.7% before RTSA to 1.4, 26.4, 80.5, 77.2% after RTSA, respectively (P < .001). Overall, 45 complications (15.1%) were observed in 44 patients. The order of frequency of complications was as follows: 16 cases of scapular stress fracture (5.4%), 9 intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic fracture (3.0%), 6 brachial plexus injury (2.0%), 4 instability (1.3%), 2 glenoid loosening (0.7%), 2 glenoid disassembly (0.7%), 2 periprosthetic joint infection (0.7%), 1 glenoid fixation failure (0.3%), 1 humeral stem fixation failure (0.3%), 1 hematoma (0.3%), and 1 complex regional pain syndrome (0.3%). Reintervention was performed in 15 cases (5.0%) including reoperation (8 cases; 2.7%) and revision surgery (7 cases; 2.3%). ConclusionAt a mean follow-up period of 3.8 years, primary RTSA showed satisfactory clinical outcomes with a complication rate of 15.1%, a reoperation rate of 2.7%, and a revision rate of 2.3%. Scapular stress fracture appears to be the most common complication after RTSA in the Korean population.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Are Comparable Between Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Introduction: It is currently unclear whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis have similar functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) as those with osteoarthritis, particularly given that rheumatoid arthritis may have systemic manifestations in terms of pain and function. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures between patients with rheumatoid arthritis and matched control patients with osteoarthritis who underwent direct anterior THA. Methods: All patients who underwent direct anterior THA from 2010 to 2022 at a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. Hips with rheumatoid arthritis were propensity matched to hips with osteoarthritis on a 1:4 basis. Patient-reported outcome measures, including visual analog scale (VAS) pain at rest and with use, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain, and Forgotten Joint Score-12, were obtained at follow-up. In addition, modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS) were obtained both preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Results: Forty-six hips with rheumatoid arthritis and 184 hips with osteoarthritis were followed for a mean of 6.3 ± 3.6 years. Both cohorts demonstrated notable preoperative to postoperative improvements in mHHS (P &lt; 0.001). No differences were observed at the final follow-up between cohorts for VAS at rest (0.8 vs. 0.5, P = 0.333), VAS with use (1.3 vs. 0.9, P = 0.234), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain (90.4 vs. 93.6, P = 0.113), Forgotten Joint Score-12 (80.3 vs. 82.8, P = 0.529), and mHHS (86.9 vs. 89.0, P = 0.335). One patient with rheumatoid arthritis had an intraoperative periprosthetic calcar fracture, whereas none underwent subsequent revision THA. Conclusion: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis who underwent direct anterior THA achieved comparable outcomes in this propensity-matched analysis. Although patients with rheumatoid arthritis may be at an increased risk of complications and revision surgery, patients can expect reduced pain and improved functional outcomes similar to those with osteoarthritis following primary THA.

Does Femoral Stem Design Influence Periprosthetic Fracture Incidence and Morphology in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BackgroundAs the incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases, the number of periprosthetic femur fractures (PFF) will also rise. The surgical approach and stem design have been shown to influence the rate of PFF. This study evaluated PFF in cementless THA done through the posterior approach and described how stem design influences intraoperative and early postoperative fracture incidence and morphology. MethodsA retrospective review of 3,183 primary THAs for osteoarthritis from 2013 to 2021 was performed. Demographics, comorbidities, femoral stem designs, intraoperative and early postoperative PFFs (< 90 days), and aseptic femoral revisions were recorded. Stems were classified as single-wedge taper (Type 1), double-wedge taper (Type 2), or ream and broach (Type 3). There were 1,192 Type 1, 240 Type 2, and 1,726 Type 3 femoral stems. The PFF and aseptic femoral revisions were compared with univariable and multivariable analyses. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated survival to femoral revision. ResultsIn this population, 25 patients (0.8%) had an intraoperative or early postoperative PFF. Patients who had PFFs were older (68 versus 63; P = 0.03) and more likely to be women (76 versus 24%; P = 0.02). Type 2 stems had a significantly higher incidence of all-cause PFFs when compared to Type 1 (3.6 versus 0.7%; P < 0.01) and Type 3 (3.6 versus 0.4%; P < 0.01) stems. Type 2 stems also had a higher incidence of Vancouver B2 PFFs when compared to Type 3 stems (0.8 versus 0.05%; P = 0.04). Stem design was not associated with PFF or all-cause femoral revision. There were no differences in survival to femoral revision. ConclusionDouble-wedge taper stems may be associated with increased intraoperative and early postoperative PFFs, including those requiring femoral stem revision. However, there was no statistically significant difference in late PFF, aseptic loosening, or femoral revision.

Finite element analysis confirms the optimal apex position in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy to avoid lateral hinge fracture.

Lateral hinge fracture is a significant complication of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. While fracture risk is closely associated with the osteotomy apex position, the optimum position remains variable within the literature. Our hypothesis is that stresses at the osteotomy apex predicted by finite element analysis can be used to identify an apex position which minimises intra and postoperative fracture risks. A finite element model was studied to investigate the effect of varying the hinge position on fracture risk and severity for a given bone geometry; variables analysed included stress, strain and micromotion levels. Nine further knee models were studied to assess the variability between patients' bone properties and examine the effect of apex location on strains. Lateral hinge width and height significantly influence intra-operative stress, strain, and fracture risk, while hinge width predominately determines postoperative stability. Wider hinges improve postoperative stability, but increase the likelihood of intra-articular fractures. Aiming the apex at the fibular head height minimises strain. The osteotomy apex should be located such that the hinge width is equal to 13% of the medial-lateral width to minimise apex stress and fracture risk while preserving sufficient bone at the hinge for stability. The height of the apex from the tibial plateau should maintain a minimum value of 16% of the medial-lateral width to avoid intra-articular fracture, with the apex below the fibula head if necessary. The size of the tibia does not alter the optimal location, making our findings applicable across all tibia sizes. Our study has investigated and verified a proposed optimal apex position, based upon fracture risk prediction and micromotion at the osteotomy apex. This is clinically useful due to the potential use of the apex point on preoperative 2D radiographs when planning surgery. Not applicable.

Evolución del programa de recuperación rápida a cirugía ambulatoria en artroplastia total de cadera

The implementation of Enhanced Recovery programs has transformed total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. Outpatient prosthetic surgery is a safe and beneficial technique. Few centers in our country perform Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty (OTHA). We present the preliminary results of our experience Material and Method: This is a prospective observational study conducted in 2023 with a sample of 30 patients proposed for THA following an outpatient surgery protocol by the Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Service. In 2023, we performed 132 THAs in our center. Thirty patients, 27 men and 3 women with an average age of 55.7 years were included for an outpatient surgery circuit. Three patients did not meet the inclusion criteria identified by the Anesthesiology Department. Of the 27 patients included in the program, 25 were discharged on the same day. Two patients were admitted: one due to an intraoperative fracture and the other due to poor pain control and dizziness. No secondary complications related to the program were observed after discharge. All patients except one would recommend the outpatient protocol. OTHA programs should evolve from rapid recovery programs. Their implementation depends on an experienced multidisciplinary team. In this study, inclusion criteria were defined, achieving high satisfaction without increased complications. Outpatient surgery is a good option, and the implementation of this circuit is a safe, effective, and a satisfactory practice for selected patients.

Effect of cemented vs uncemented on outcomes for hemiarthroplasty in the elderly: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

In patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty in the elderly, the choice of the cemented method remains controversial. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the impact of cemented vs uncemented on outcomes for hemiarthroplasty in the elderly. This study included randomized controlled trials comparing the postoperative effects of cemented vs uncemented in patients with hemiarthroplasty. With no language restrictions, we searched Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Collaboration), Clinical Trials.gov, the ISRCTN registry, as well as gray literature with no language restrictions from January 1966 to April 2023. Data were quantitatively summarized using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. This study included 13 randomized controlled trials with 3485 patients. The primary outcomes of the meta-analysis showed that cemented fixation in elderly patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty was superior to noncemented in 1-year mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77, 0.97). Moreover, cemented was associated with a reduced risk of intraoperative periprosthetic fracture (RR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.50), postoperative periprosthetic fracture (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16,0.72), and loosening (RR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.97). Cemented hemiarthroplasty is superior to noncemented in terms of survival. Moreover, cementation reduces the incidence of some implant-related complications. More extensive trials are needed to provide adequate guidance for choosing the proper cemented method.

Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Management and Functional Outcomes.

Intraoperative acetabular fracture (IAF) is a non-common complication of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite the prevalence of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures are increasing, little has been written about this type of fracture. The main objective is to analyze possible risk factors, treatment options and functional outcomes associated with IAF. Between 2006 and 2020, 4 senior arthroplasty surgeons performed 5540 uncemented primary THA. We reviewed our Total Joint Registry and found 18 cases with an IAF. We analyzed demographic factors, medical history, preoperative diagnose, acetabular cups designs, anatomic location of the fracture, treatment, associated complications and functional outcomes. The minimum duration of follow-up was 12 months. The prevalence of an IAF was 0,3%. All the acetabular cups were hemispherical modular. The most frequent acetabular cup associated with an IAF was the CSF Plus (JRI). In two cases the acetabular components were judged to be stable and no additional treatment was done. In the other sixteen patients, various surgical procedures were carried out. Almost 30% of patients that sustained an IAF had some complication during their follow up. Moreover, poor functionality outcomes were obtained (12.1 ± 4.1). in the final follow up accordance to Postel Merle d'Aubingé score. Although IAF is a rare complication of THA, maintaining a high index of suspicion is important as they can be difficult to identify. Still with an adequate early treatment they have poor functionality and high risk of associated complications.

Management of Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Current Concept Review.

Intraoperative acetabular fractures (IAFs), a complication seldomly encountered in total hip arthroplasty, are typically a result of the impact of insertion of a cementless press-fit cup. Factors that contribute to the risk of these types of fractures include poor bone quality, highly sclerotic bone, and the use of a press-fit cup that is excessively large. The approach to management of these fractures is dependent on when they are identified. Immediate stabilization measures should be implemented for management of fractures detected during surgery. When fractures are detected postoperatively, the decision regarding conservative treatment is dependent on the stability of the implant and the specific fracture pattern. In the majority of cases, effective treatment of an acetabular fracture detected intraoperatively can be administered using a multi-hole revision cup along with anchoring screws in the various regions of the acetabulum. Selection of plate osteosynthesis of the posterior column is recommended when there is a large posterior wall fragment or pelvic discontinuity. In cases where anatomical dimensions allow, cup-cage reconstruction may offer a promising alternative to a combined hip procedure. The number of reports addressing the management of IAFs is limited. This review focuses on outlining the strategies that are currently available for management of this seldomly encountered complication.

Acetabular revision for iliopsoas impingement: a study of 55 cases at 3 years of follow-up. Does the procedure achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the Oxford-12 score in more than 80% of cases?

IntroductionSeveral surgical options can be offered to manage iliopsoas impingement. Research published on cup replacements often concerns a small population size or multicentre studies, suggesting a variety of indications. We conducted a retrospective single centre study screening according to a specific protocol of a population of patients who had a cup replacement for iliopsoas impingement. The objectives were: 1) to specify the functional outcomes and the achievement of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) according to the Oxford-12 score, and 2) to assess the complication rate. HypothesisOur hypothesis was that acetabular replacements achieve a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in more than 80% of cases. Patients and methodsFifty-five hips underwent acetabular revision between 2011 and 2020. Forty-three were performed as first-line surgery, eight after failed tenotomy and four after failed anterior hip capsule thickening plasty. A CT scan of all the hips revealed a median overhang of 9 mm (7; 12) and a 7 ° cup anteversion (2; 19). Follow-up included assessment of the Oxford-12 score using MCID and PASS, the Merle d'Aubigné score, an assessment of hip flexion muscle strength using the Medical Research Council scale, and an assessment of satisfaction and complications. ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 3 years (2–10), the difference in the Oxford score before and at follow-up was 18 points (15; 27) (p < 0.001), the median Medical Research Council score was 4.5 (4; 5) and patients were satisfied or very satisfied in 73% of cases (40/55). The MCID was achieved for 87% of the hips (48/55), and the PASS was achieved in 67% of cases (33/55). The rate of complications involving surgical revision was 10.9% (6/55) with respectively: two anterior dislocations, one early infection on day 10 resolved after wound irrigation and appropriate antibiotic therapy, one intraoperative fracture of the trochanter requiring osteosynthesis and one arthroscopic revision to remove a free cement fragment. ConclusionDue to a good functional outcome but a high complication rate, a cup replacement can be offered for iliopsoas impingement associated with acetabular malposition or significant overhang. Level of evidenceIV.

Mid-Term to Long-Term Outcomes and Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Crowe IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundSevere forms of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in adulthood often lead to total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term to long-term outcomes of THA in Crowe type IV DDH cases, which represent a technically challenging and complex patient group. MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for observational studies and case series with over 100 months of mean follow-up on adult patients who had Crowe type IV DDH treated with THA. A total of 3,710 records were initially identified, leading to the inclusion of 24 studies in the final analysis. These studies were subjected to quality assessment using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment tool. Various outcomes including revision rates, leg-length discrepancy, Harris Hip Score, and complications like periprosthetic joint infections, dislocations, and nerve injuries were analyzed. A random effects model was employed for statistical analysis, with sensitivity analysis and metaregression applied in cases of high heterogeneity. ResultsThe included studies assessed 1,024 hips with a mean follow-up of 11 years, revealing improvements in Harris Hip Score and reductions in leg length discrepancy post-THA. However, notable challenges were noted, including a 10.7% rate of intraoperative fractures, a 1.8% periprosthetic joint infection rate, and a 5.8% dislocation rate. Osteolysis and aseptic loosening revisions were observed in 9.1 and 8% of cases, respectively. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 11.1% of patients. Nerve injury was reported in 4.2% of cases. With the use of metaregression, some factors for observed heterogeneity were identified. ConclusionsTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) in Crowe type IV DDH patients presents notable challenges, but can lead to substantial long-term improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Level of EvidenceIV.

RISK OF PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE AFTER PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING A COLLARED CEMENTLESS (CC) OR TAPER-SLIP CEMENTED STEM (PTS)

A: - determine the incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF)B: - determine the incidence of, and the reoperation rate for postoperative PFFWhen using either CC or PTS femoral components.Retrospective review of a consecutive series of 11,018 THAs over a ten-year period. All PFFs were identified using regional radiograph archiving and electronic care systems.Of the 11,018 THAs 4,952 were CC and 6,066 were PTS. Between groups, age, sex, and BMI did not differ.A: - 55 (0.5%) had an intraoperative PFF. 44 CC and 11 PTS (p&lt;0.001). 3 patients in each group had a femoral shaft fracture, remaining fractures were either the calcar (20 CC and 2 group) or the greater trochanter (11 CC and 6 PTS).B: - 91(0.8%) sustained a postoperative PFF. Of those 15 were managed conservatively, 15 were revised and 61 (80.3%) had an ORIF. The CC group had both a lower overall rate of postoperative PFFs (0.7% (36/4,952) vs 0.9% (55/6,066); p = 0.341), and a lower rate of return to theatre (0.4% (22/4,952) vs 0.9% (54/6,066); p = 0.005). 1.3% of male PTS (36/2,674) had a reoperation compared to 0.3% of male CC (7/2,121) (p&lt;0.001).With regard to stem fracture there were none in the Corail group and 5 in the Exeter group. Of these 2 were sub trunnion and 3 were basal neck.A: - There were significantly more intraoperative PFFs with CC 44 (0.8%) than PTS 11 (0.2%). However, the majority of fractures were either of the calcar or greater trochanter with no impact on early recovery or one year Oxford scores.B: - Male PTS were five times more likely to have a reoperation for postoperative PFF. Females had the same incidence of reoperation with either component type.There were 5 stem fractures in the Exeter group and none in the Corail.These results represent robust estimates, which are likely to be more accurate than revision only studies typically generated from registry data.

What features of stem increase the risk of intraoperative femoral fracture during cementless primary hip arthroplasty?

Cementless fixation has become increasingly popular in hip arthroplasty due to its shorter operation time, easier technique, biologic fixation, and avoidance of bone cement implantation syndrome compared to cemented fixation. However, intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (IOPFx) is a disconcerting complication during cementless hip arthroplasty. Our purpose was to identify the features of cementless stem that increase the risk of IOPFx during primary hip arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed all 4806 hip arthroplasties that was performed in a single institution from May 2003 to December 2020. Age at the index arthroplasty, sex, body mass index, physical status, ambulatory function, side of the operation, operational history, cause of the index arthroplasty, type of arthroplasty, surgical approach, surgeon, implant information, and events during the operation were investigated. The shoulder geometry and length of stem were also reviewed. The event of interest was narrowed down to IOPFx among various records of intraoperative events. We found IOPFx of 2.6% among all the hips operated with cementless stem. In the multivariable analysis, female (OR = 1.52), childhood hip disease (OR = 2.30), stove-pipe femur (OR = 2.43), combined approach (OR = 2.60), and standard length of stem (OR = 1.59) were found to be significant risk factors of IOPFx. In conclusion, a stem with a standard length is significantly associated with risk of IOPFx compared to a shortened stem. These findings highlight the importance of careful consideration in terms of the risk of IOPFx when standard length cementless stem is chosen.

Impact of Intraoperative Femoral Fractures During Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures

BackgroundThere have been several studies on intraoperative femoral fractures (IFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty, but it is not well understood how this complication affects the patient population undergoing cemented hemiarthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the impact of IFFs sustained during cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were treated for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association 31B fractures with cemented hemiarthroplasty between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2021, at a single academic level 1 trauma center. An initial cohort was constructed of all patients who sustained an IFF during their surgery, yielding 31 patients after excluding those who sustained a pathologic fracture or had incomplete data. These patients were matched 1:2 on age, sex, and body mass index to patients in a control cohort. The primary outcome measure was implant failure. Secondary outcome measures included complications, all-cause mortality, and radiographic outcomes (subsidence, femoral component loosening, acetabular wear, and heterotopic ossification) postoperatively. ResultsSubsequent implant revision was required in 3.2% (n = 1) of patients who sustained an IFF and 1.6% (n = 1) of patients who did not. After adjusting for comorbidities, there was no observed excess risk of implant failure in the fracture cohort when compared to the control cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30, P = 0.740). There was no observed excess risk of morbidity (HR = 0.69, P = 0.621) or all-cause mortality (HR = 0.23, P = 0.330). Radiographic outcomes also did not significantly differ between the 2 cohorts (P > 0.05). ConclusionsIntraoperative fractures during cemented hemiarthroplasty do not contribute to an increased risk of secondary surgery, morbidity, or mortality after surgery. They also do not adversely affect radiographic outcomes postoperatively. Level of EvidenceLevel III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

A comparison of the clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach and posterior approach: A meta-analysis.

The approach of total hip arthroplasty (THA) has long been controversial, and many studies have compared different approaches. However, there is still a lack of consistent conclusions and comprehensive, systematic comparisons and evaluations. This study retrieved 7 databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database. The search time ranged from the establishment of each database to November 1, 2023. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4, and outcome was presented as the weighed mean difference for continuous data and risk/odds ratio for dichotomous data. We used the Mantel-Haneszel method and random effects model to obtain the overall effects of the differences in the impact of 2 surgical methods on clinical outcomes in all included studies. A total of 33 articles were included in this study, including 14478 participants, 4911 participants in DAA group and 9567 participants in PA group. The visual analogue scale scores of the DAA group at 1 day and 2 days after THA were significantly lower than those of the PA group (mean difference [MD] = -0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.83 to -0.30, P < .01) at 1 day and (MD = -0.67, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.17, P = .01) at 2 days. The risk of intraoperative fracture (odds ratio = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.11-4.29, P = .05) and lateral femoral nerve injury (risk ratio = 7.84, 95% CI: 1.69-36.42, P < .01) in the DAA group was significantly higher than that of the PA group. The number of prostheses in the Lewinnek safe zone of the DAA group was significantly higher than that of the PA group (risk ratio = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00-1.27, P = .05). The results showed no significant difference between the DAA group and the PA group in the time to stop using walking aids, dislocation rate, groin pain, incision complications, heterotopic ossification, intraoperative blood loss, and acetabular anterior (P > .05). Compared with the PA group, patients in the DAA group showed more ideal anatomical and imaging results, shorter hospital stay, and showing advantages in postoperative pain, but with a higher incidence of intraoperative complications.

Iatrogenic Intraoperative Fracture in Patients With Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic defect in collagen type I, phenotypically characterized by bony fragility and a propensity to high rates of childhood fracture. Fragility fractures in patients with OI have been reported with routine hospital care. In addition, there is a nonzero rate of iatrogenic fracture during orthopaedic surgery directly related to the technical steps of the procedure itself. The rate of this latter has never been explicitly investigated. A review of all patients at a single OI referral center was conducted, including all patients with a diagnosis of OI seen between 2013 and 2023, inclusive. All patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery of any kind were reviewed, and clinical and radiographic details of all procedures were extracted. Among the details examined were the OI subtype, surgery details, any implants used, intraoperative and hospital stay complications, modified Clavien-Dindo classification of complications, and ultimate outcome. Eleven of 60 patients experienced an unplanned, iatrogenic intraoperative fracture during orthopaedic surgery (11/60 = 18.3%). This comprised 15 fractures among 356 total orthopaedic surgical episodes (15/356 = 4.2%). All but one fracture occurred on the operative long bone segment, all were a direct result of surgical steps, and 11 of 15 fractures occurred in the femur. Most fractures were secondary to the removal, insertion, or exchange of intramedullary implants in the lower extremity (11 of 15 fractures), most often the femur. Thirteen of 15 injuries were classified as modified Clavien-Dindo II or III, requiring modification of postop rehabilitation, additional treatments, or surgical intervention (87%). Overall, iatrogenic fracture was the most common intraoperative complication experienced in the cohort. Iatrogenic fracture during orthopaedic surgery for patients with OI is not uncommon. A sizeable minority of patients with OI undergoing orthopaedic surgery will experience unplanned fractures, most commonly in the femur, and care is altered in most instances. The risk of intraoperative fracture can be discussed with families of children with OI as part of informed consent and shared decision-making. Level IV-retrospective cohort series.

Anterior Cortical Impingement With 240 mm Cephalo-Medullary Nail (PFN and PFNA-2) in Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Fixation in the Indian Population: A Problem Statement.

Trochanteric fractures are common in the elderly population, and their incidence increases twice every decade after age 50. Intramural fixation has achieved good clinical efficacy in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures, but there have been complications reported in the literature in the Asian population. Most complications arise from a mismatch between the increase in the anterior femoral bow with advancing age and the proximal femoral nails (PFN) on the market, which still have straight designs on the sagittal plane. The non-anatomic shapes of the PFNs sometimes make the surgeries difficult or may lead to an inadvertent intraoperative fracture around the tip of the nail, particularly if they impinge on the anterior cortex of the femur. The entry point on the greater trochanter was divided into three equal parts, i.e., anterior 1/3rd, middle 1/3rd, and posterior 1/3rd on the lateral X-rays. Patients with posterior 1/3rd entry were excluded from the study as it is known that posterior positioning of nail entry can cause an increased incidence of anterior nail impingement. The AI was measured using the best available preoperative lateral roentgenogram of the femur using the incidence cortex (AI cortex) angle. This angle was measured using two tangential lines drawn parallel to the anterior cortex of the femur, proximal and distal to the most bowed point of the femur. We recommend that there is a need to introduce anterior curvature in the sagittal plane corresponding to the femoral bow in a 240 mm cephalomedullary nail to decrease complications. We also consider the use of either a short (i.e., 180 mm) or a long cephalomedullary nail in the Indian population, as the height of the population is shorter as compared to the western population, and the role of a 240 mm cephalomedullary nail is doubtful in the Indian population.

Computational biomechanical study on hybrid implant materials for the femoral component of total knee replacements

Multifunctional materials have been described to meet the diverse requirements of implant materials for femoral components of uncemented total knee replacements. These materials aim to combine the high wear and corrosion resistance of oxide ceramics at the joint surfaces with the osteogenic potential of titanium alloys at the bone-implant interface. Our objective was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of hybrid material-based femoral components regarding mechanical stress within the implant during cementless implantation and stress shielding (evaluated by strain energy density) of the periprosthetic bone during two-legged squat motion using finite element modeling. The hybrid materials consisted of alumina-toughened zirconia (ATZ) ceramic joined with additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V or Ti–35Nb–6Ta alloys. The titanium component was modeled with or without an open porous surface structure. Monolithic femoral components of ATZ ceramic or Co–28Cr–6Mo alloy were used as reference. The elasticity of the open porous surface structure was determined within experimental compression tests and was significantly higher for Ti–35Nb–6Ta compared to Ti–6Al–4V (5.2 ± 0.2 GPa vs. 8.8 ± 0.8 GPa, p < 0.001). During implantation, the maximum stress within the ATZ femoral component decreased from 1568.9 MPa (monolithic ATZ) to 367.6 MPa (Ti–6Al–4V/ATZ), 560.9 MPa (Ti–6Al–4V/ATZ with an open porous surface), 474.9 MPa (Ti–35Nb–6Ta/ATZ), and 648.4 MPa (Ti–35Nb–6Ta/ATZ with an open porous surface). The strain energy density increased at higher flexion angles for all models during the squat movement. At ∼90° knee flexion, the strain energy density in the anterior region of the distal femur increased by 25.7 % (Ti–6Al–4V/ATZ), 70.3 % (Ti–6Al–4V/ATZ with an open porous surface), 43.7 % (Ti–35Nb–6Ta/ATZ), and 82.5% (Ti–35Nb–6Ta/ATZ with an open porous surface) compared to monolithic ATZ. Thus, the hybrid material-based femoral component decreases the intraoperative fracture risk of the ATZ part and considerably reduces the risk of stress shielding of the periprosthetic bone.