Intracranial Progression Research Articles

Quality of life after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis: an assessment from a prospective national registry.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is frequently used in the management of brain metastasis patients. However, there is an urgent need to evaluate post-treatment outcomes and quality of life metrics for patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases. The NeuroPoint Alliance (NPA) SRS Quality Registry conducted prospective enrollment of patients undergoing SRS from 2017 to 2024. Patients with brain metastases from lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma were included in the analysis. Outcomes of interest included quality of life metrics, as captured by the five-dimension Euro-QOL (EQ-5D) at 6-12 months and last record follow-up, overall survival, local progression, out-of-field progression, and overall intracranial progression. 522 patients comprised our analytic cohort, and 315 patients had available EQ-5D data at the time of SRS and final follow-up. 264 (47.8%), 197 (35.7%), and 91 (16.5%) patients had 1, 2-4, and 5-14 lesions pre-SRS, respectively. The median overall survival time from diagnosis was 27.3 months. The median time-to-local progression was not reached. At final follow-up, 107 (34.0%) patients had improvement, 51 (16.2%) patients had stable, and 113 patients (35.9%) had worsening EQ-5D scores when compared to baseline. For 44 (13.9%) patients mixed responses across the EQ-5D indices were reported. Linear regression analysis showed that male sex, smoking status, primary tumor type, time-to-overall progression, cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV), and baseline EQ-5D were statistically significantly associated with EQ-5D single index at the final follow-up. Real-world data from the SRS NPA Registry demonstrated that most patients with brain metastasis had no change or improvement in quality of life after SRS. Baseline EQ-5D was predictive of EQ-5D single index at final follow-up, and, as such, EQ-5D at baseline would be a valuable assessment measure for brain metastasis patients undergoing SRS.

Site-specific m6A-miR-494-3p, not unmethylated miR-494-3p, compromises blood brain barrier by targeting tight junction protein 1 in intracranial atherosclerosis.

Intracranial atherosclerosis is one of the most common causes of ischaemic stroke. However, there is a substantial knowledge gap on the development of intracranial atherosclerosis. Intracranial arteries are characterized by an upregulation of tight junctions between endothelial cells, which control endothelial permeability. We investigated the role of N6-methyladenosine (m6A), a common RNA modification, on endothelial integrity, focusing on the pro-atherogenic microRNA miR-494-3p and tight junction proteins TJP1 and PECAM1. We assessed the m6A landscape, along with the expression of miR-494-3p, TJP1 and PECAM1 in postmortem human vertebral arteries (VA), internal carotid arteries (ICA), and middle cerebral arteries (MCA) with various stages of intimal thickening and plaque formation. The interactions between m6A-modified miR-494-3p mimics, TJP1 and PECAM1, were investigated in vitro using primary human (brain) endothelial cells. Increased m6A expression was observed in the luminal lining of atherosclerosis-affected VAs, accompanied by reduced TJP1 and PECAM1, but not VE-cadherin, expression. Colocalization of m6A and miR-494-3p in the luminal lining of VA plaques was confirmed, indicating m6A methylation of miR-494-3p in intracranial atherosclerosis. Moreover, site-specific m6A-modification of miR-494-3p led to repression specifically of TJP1 protein expression at cell-cell junctions of brain microvascular endothelial cells, while unmodified miR-494-3p showed no effect. This study highlights increasing m6A levels during intracranial atherogenesis. Increases in m6A-miR-494-3p contribute to the observed decreased TJP1 expression in endothelial cell-cell junctions. This is likely to have a negative effect on endothelial integrity and may thus accelerate intracranial atherosclerosis progression.

Glioblastoma multiforme recurrence on skin and subcutaneous tissue: a case report

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor. It presents an aggressive pattern, with a tendency for intracranial progression despite optimal treatment. On the other hand, metastases and manifestations outside the CNS are exceptional, and very few cases have been described. The authors submitted a case of a 48-year-old male diagnosed with a left parietooccipital GBM isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type, non-methylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Six months after surgical treatment, followed by a chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy scheme, he developed a few subcutaneous erythematous nodules within the surgical scar. A punch biopsy confirmed the histopathology of GBM. The CT scan showed concomitant intracranial progression. We ruled out systemic metastases. As the performance status was good [Karnofsky Performance Status 90 (KPS 90)] and the subcutaneous implants were growing rapidly, limiting the quality of life, we decided to perform palliative surgery to remove the implants. The result was good. Unfortunately, the patient worsened during the following week, after ruling out medical complications, we attributed the worsening to cerebral tumor swelling, revealed in the CT scan, as unresponsive to steroids. He passed away a few days later. Based on the analysis of our case, we intend to provide useful information for the approach to this peculiar manifestation of GBM.

Pyrotinib plus capecitabine for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases (PERMEATE trial): overall survival results from a multicenter, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 trial

The phase 2 PERMEATE study has shown the antitumor activity and safety of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases. In this report, survival results were updated with extended follow-up. Between January 29, 2019 and July 10, 2020, adult patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who had radiotherapy-naïve brain metastases (cohort A, n=59) or progressive disease after radiotherapy (cohort B, n=19) were enrolled and received pyrotinib (400mg once daily) and capecitabine (1000mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Secondary endpoints progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were updated, and post-hoc central nervous system (CNS)-PFS was analyzed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03691051). As of February 2, 2023, the median follow-up duration was 30.9 months (interquartile range, 16.1-39.8). Median PFS was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6-14.6) in cohort A and 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.4-11.5) in cohort B. Median OS was 35.9 months (95% CI, 24.4-not reached) in cohort A and 30.6 months (95% CI, 12.6-33.3) in cohort B. Median CNS-PFS was 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.0-15.8) in cohort A and 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.4-11.5) in cohort B. Median OS was 34.1 months (95% CI, 21.7-not reached) for 14 patients with intracranial progression only in cohort A who restarted pyrotinib plus capecitabine after local radiotherapy. These data support further validation in a randomized controlled trial for the assessment of pyrotinib in combination with capecitabine as systemic therapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases. National Cancer Center Climbing Foundation Key Project of China, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals.

Phosphorylated NPY1R regulates phenotypic transition of vascular smooth muscle cells, inflammatory response and macrophage infiltration to promote intracranial aneurysm progression

BackgroundRupture of intracranial aneurysm (IA) could give rise to spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage, leading to a high disability rate and even death. NPY1R expression was upregulated in aneurysm tissues of IA patients. However, the role and underlying mechanism of NPY1R remains unknown. MethodsThe IA model of mice was established using inducing systemic hypertension and injecting elastase. The expression of genes and proteins was detected by RT-qPCR and western blot. The number of T cells, macrophages, and neutrophils in IA mice was detected using flow cytometry and IF assay. The levels of inflammatory factors were measured using ELISA. Patho-morphology and inflammatory cells in aneurysm tissues were evaluated by HE staining. The interaction between TK and NPY1R was validated using Co-IP. ResultsNPY1R expression was greatly elevated in aneurysm tissues in IA patients and mice, which were positively related to macrophage infiltration. Besides, exogenous overexpression of NPY1R resulted in the promotion of contractile phenotype to the synthetic phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), inflammatory response and M1 macrophage polarization. In terms of the underlying mechanism, NPY1R protein could be modified by TK-mediated phosphorylation and TKI could decrease IA formation and suppresse contractile phenotype to synthetic phenotype of VSMCs, inflammatory response and M1 macrophage polarization in IA mice. Furthermore, ablating mouse macrophages abolished NPY1R overexpression-mediated promotion of IA formation and rupture in mice. ConclusionPhosphorylated NPY1R contributed to IA progression through promoting contractile phenotype to synthetic phenotype of VSMCs, inflammatory response and M1 macrophage polarization in IA.

The DEBBRAH trial: Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is associated with poor survival and diminished quality of life. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has shown remarkable intracranial and extracranial activity in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and HER2-low advanced breast cancer (ABC). The DEBBRAH trial was designed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low ABC with a history of brain metastases (BMs) and/or LMD. Here, we report results from cohort 5, which specifically included patients with pathologically confirmed LMD. This single-arm, open-label, five-cohort, phase 2 trial enrolled seven patients in cohort 5 who received 5.4mg/kg T-DXd intravenously every 21days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety profile. At data cutoff (April 4, 2023), the median duration of follow-up was 12.0months (range, 2.5-18.6). The median OS was 13.3months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-NA, p<0.001), meeting the primary endpoint. The median PFS was 8.9months (95% CI, 2.1-NA). Two (28.6%) of seven patients remained on treatment after 18.6 and 11.9months, respectively. Of the five patients who progressed and died, none had intracranial progression or clinical worsening of leptomeningeal symptoms. Notably, 71.4% (95% CI, 29.0-96.3) achieved prolonged stabilization (≥24weeks) by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v.1.1. No unexpected safety signals and no treatment-related deaths were observed. T-DXd showed promising antitumor activity in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low ABC with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed LMD. These encouraging data warrant further investigation to address the unmet need in this difficult-to-treat condition. This work was funded by Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04420598.

Outcome of whole brain irradiation with a dose-escalated simultaneous-integrated boost in patients with multiple large and/or diffuse brain metastases: real live data and review of the literature

BackgroundWe retrospectively investigate feasibility and safety of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) including a simultaneous-integrated boost technique (WBRT-SIB) in a cohort of patients with a very poor prognosis suffering from multiple and/or large brain metastases, unfavorable primary histology, poor performance status and/or symptomatic BMs.Materials and MethodsThirty-five patients with high brain tumor burden, extracranial metastases and low life-expectancy were treated with WBRT-SIB mostly with 35-42 Gy/14 fractions. All metastases were boosted in patients with up to 12 BMs. In patients with > 12 BM, large and/or small metastases in critical brain regions were boosted up to a maximum of 12 SIB volumes.ResultsThe median number of BM was 8 (range 2–45) and the median BM diameter was 12 mm (range 4–90 mm). Fifteen (43%) patients had ≥ 10 BMs and 25 patients presented with a Karnofski index ≤ 80%. Primary tumor histology was NSCLC (n = 13), SCLC (n = 11), breast cancer (n = 7), melanoma (n = 2), other (n = 2). The median iPFS was not reached, and 12- and 18-months iPFS were 75% and 50%, respectively. Overall, seven patients had intracranial progression: two patients within the SIB and WBRT area, one patient only within the SIB region and four patients had new BMs in the WBRT volume alone. The median iPFS for non-SCLC patients was 17 months and the 12- and 18-month iPFS were 56.8% and 28.4%, respectively. There was no significant OS difference between SCLC-group and non-SCLC patients (p = 0.38). Overall, median OS was 8.7 months and 1-year OS was 25%. The treatment was generally well-tolerated with no observed cases of radionecrosis.ConclusionOur WBRT-SIB approach involves a combination of whole brain radiotherapy and a simultaneous integrated boost to specific tumor volumes, and its effectiveness is compared with other treatment modalities in the literature. Further research, including prospective studies with larger patient cohorts, is necessary to validate and refine the findings.

Clinicogenomic predictors of survival and intracranial progression after stereotactic radiosurgery for colorectal cancer brain metastases.

Brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are associated with dismal prognosis. When BM-directed therapy is considered, better methods are needed to identify patients at risk of poor oncological outcomes in order to optimize patient selection for closer surveillance or escalated therapy. The authors sought to identify clinicogenomic predictors of survival and intracranial disease progression after CRC BM have been treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Patients with newly diagnosed CRC BM treated with SRS between 2009 and 2022 who had next-generation genomic sequencing data available were included. Frameless SRS was delivered in 1-5 fractions, alone or after neurosurgical resection. Outcomes included overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression (IP), evaluated per patient treated with SRS, and local progression (LP), evaluated per BM. Associations between baseline clinicogenomic features and outcomes were evaluated with Cox regression and competing risk regression, with death as a competing risk. This analysis included 123 patients with 299 BM. At BM diagnosis, 111 patients (90%) had progressive extracranial disease, and 79 patients (64%) had ≥ 3 sites of extracranial metastasis. The median (IQR) number of BM was 2 (1-3) per patient. The median (IQR) biologically effective dose (BED) was 51.3 (51.3-65.1) Gy, corresponding to a prescription of 27 Gy in 3 fractions. OS, IP, and LP estimates at 1 year after SRS were 36%, 55%, and 12%, respectively. OS was independently associated with progressive extracranial disease (HR 4.26, 95% CI 1.63-11.2, p = 0.003) and ≥ 3 extracranial metastatic sites (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.12-3.01, p = 0.02). LP was less likely when BM received BED ≥ 51.3 Gy (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.78, p = 0.02), independent of BM diameter (HR 1.21/cm, 95% CI 0.8-1.84, p = 0.4). IP was independently associated with genomic alterations; TP53 driver alterations were associated with higher risk of IP (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.26-5.79, p = 0.01), whereas MYC pathway alterations were associated with lower risk (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.68, p = 0.01). The authors identified clinicogenomic features associated with adverse outcomes after SRS for CRC BM. Progressive and extensive extracranial metastases predicted worse OS. Insufficient SRS doses predicted greater risk of LP. Wild-type TP53 and alterations in the MYC pathway were independently associated with lower risk of IP. Patients at high risk of IP may be considered for closer surveillance or escalated therapy.

Brain Radiotherapy Combined with Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases.

Research on the sequencing of brain radiotherapy and targeted chemotherapy after brain metastasis (BM) in HER2-positive breast cancer patients is limited and inconclusive. This study investigated the efficacy of sequential delivery of radiotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with BM. Fifty-seven patients were categorized into two groups: the targeted-radiotherapy group (receiving 2-8 cycles of anti-HER2-targeted therapy followed by radiotherapy after BM) and the radiotherapy-targeted group (undergoing radiotherapy first, followed by regular anti-HER2-targeted therapy). The study endpoints were intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival. Factors associated with intracranial progression and mortality were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Patients in the radiotherapy-targeted group had better iPFS (P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.145). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that different sequential treatment groups were independent prognostic factors for iPFS. In patients with a modified breast graded prognostic assessment score of 3.5-4.0, the median survival time was 26 months in the radiotherapy-targeted group and 22 months in the targeted-radiotherapy group (P = 0.019). Overall, radiotherapy followed by targeted therapy may improve survival in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with BM, particularly in those with a modified breast graded prognostic assessment score of 3.5-4.0.

Humanin activates integrin αV–TGFβ axis and leads to glioblastoma progression

The role of mitochondria peptides in the spreading of glioblastoma remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the mechanism underlying intracranial glioblastoma progression. Our findings demonstrate that the mitochondria-derived peptide, humanin, plays a significant role in enhancing glioblastoma progression through the intratumoral activation of the integrin alpha V (ITGAV)–TGF beta (TGFβ) signaling axis. In glioblastoma tissues, humanin showed a significant upregulation in the tumor area compared to the corresponding normal region. Utilizing multiple in vitro pharmacological and genetic approaches, we observed that humanin activates the ITGAV pathway, leading to cellular attachment and filopodia formation. This process aids the subsequent migration and invasion of attached glioblastoma cells through intracellular TGFβR signaling activation. In addition, our in vivo orthotopic glioblastoma model provides further support for the pro-tumoral function of humanin. We observed a correlation between poor survival and aggressive invasiveness in the humanin-treated group, with noticeable tumor protrusions and induced angiogenesis compared to the control. Intriguingly, the in vivo effect of humanin on glioblastoma was significantly reduced by the treatment of TGFBR1 inhibitor. To strengthen these findings, public database analysis revealed a significant association between genes in the ITGAV–TGFβR axis and poor prognosis in glioblastoma patients. These results collectively highlight humanin as a pro-tumoral factor, making it a promising biological target for treating glioblastoma.

Repeated HyperArc radiosurgery for recurrent intracranial metastases and dosimetric analysis of recurrence pattern to account for diffuse dose effect on microscopical disease

AimsEvaluate effectiveness and safety of multiple HyperArc courses and patterns of progression in patients affected by BMs with intracranial progression. Methods56 patients were treated for 702 BMs with 197 (range 2–8) HyperArc courses in case of exclusive intracranial progression. Primary end-point was the overall survival (OS), secondary end-points were intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), toxicity, local control (LC), neurological death (ND), and whole-brain RT (WBRT)-free survival. Site of progression was evaluated against isodoses levels (0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 20, and 24 Gy.). ResultsThe 1-year OS was 70 %, and the median was 20.8 months (17–36). At the univariate analysis (UVA) biological equivalent dose (BED) > 51.3 Gy and non-melanoma histology significantly correlated with OS. The median time to iPFS was 4.9 months, and the 1-year iPFS was 15 %. Globally, 538 new BMs occurred after the first HA cycle in patients with extracranial disease controlled. 96.4 % of them occurred within the isodoses range 0–7 Gy as follows: 26.6 % (0 Gy), 16.5 % (1 Gy), 16.5 % (2 Gy), 20.1 % (3 Gy), 13.1 % (5 Gy), 3.4 % (7 Gy) (p = 0.00). Radionecrosis occurred in 2 metastases (0.28 %). No clinical toxicity of grade 3 or higher occurred during follow-up. One- and 2-year LC was 90 % and 79 %, respectively. At the UVA BED > 70 Gy and non-melanoma histology were significant predictors of higher LC. The 2-year WBRT-free survival was 70 %. After a median follow-up of 17.4 months, 12 patients deceased by ND. ConclusionIntracranical relapses can be safely and effectively treated with repeated HyperArc, with the aim to postpone or avoid WBRT. Diffuse dose by volumetric RT might reduce microscopic disease also at relatively low levels, potentially acting as a virtual CTV. Neurological death is not the most common cause of death in this population, which highlights the impact of extracranial disease on overall survival.

Melanoma brain metastasis treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and systemic agents (SACT): A single centre perspective from Northeast England.

e21500 Background: Melanoma incidence rates in the UK will increase and given its proclivity for brain metastasis, it will be a growing challenge. Real-world survival data reflecting the impact of modern SACTs and SRS is lacking. Here we report our single-centre experience. Methods: All melanoma brain metastasis patients treated with both SRS and SACT in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK between January 2017 and January 2022 were identified. Data was collected from patient records until data-lock in January 2023. Survival analysis was performed using R (version 4.2.2). The primary objective was to measure the overall survival. Results: 51 patients were included. The median age was 60 years. Most patients had ECOG PS of 0 (43%, n = 22) or 1 (53%, n = 27). 15 (29%) had de-novo brain metastasis. 21 (41%) were on SACT before diagnosis of brain metastasis. 28 (55%) patients had solitary brain metastasis. 8 (16%) had no radiologically reported extracranial disease. Superficial spreading melanoma was the most common histological subtype (45%, n = 23). 55% (n = 26) had a sensitizing BRAF mutation. 25 patients (49%) received SRS before SACT. 12 (26%) patients had undergone primary debulking surgery. The median time to start SRS was 54 days (IQR 35 - 90) from brain metastasis diagnosis. Median extracranial progression-free survival was 25 months (95% CI 10 – NA). Median intracranial progression-free survival was 29 months (95% CI 15 – NA). 17 (33%) patients had both intra and extracranial progression. 7 (13%) had in-field intracranial progression. The median target volume was similar between subgroups that had infield (1.78mL, IQR 0.56 - 13.81), out-of-field (1.78mL, IRQ 1.62 - 3.97) or no intracranial progression (2.38mL, IQR 1.29 - 6.73). The median total dose to target was 21 Grays for all subgroups. Median overall survival was 27 months (95% CI 16 - NA). With intracranial progression, the median overall survival was 21 months (95% CI 10 –36). The survival was 15 months (95% CI 9.5 - 27) with extracranial progression, which was significantly less than without extracranial progression (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 – 0.60, p = 0.002). In the absence of intracranial progression, median overall survival was not reached. Patients with infield progression had an overall survival of 8.6 months (95% CI 6.8 – NA), HR 2.83 (95% CI 1.20 - 6.7), p = 0.018. Those with melanoma-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment score (molGPA) &gt; 2.5 had a median overall survival of 31 months (95% CI 14 – NA) with a HR of 0.73 (95% CI 0.32 - 1.64, p = 0.4). Conclusions: Survival in our cohort is notably better than reports from prior series. This is despite our catchment in the North East of England being adversely affected by health disparity. This could be explained by the selection bias of our cohort. However, in the wake of improved treatment modalities, the need for more up-to-date cancer data tracking cannot be overstated.

Results from METIS (EF-25), an international, multicenter phase III randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy in NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

2008 Background: For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the current preferred therapy. Due to frequent intracranial failures, there is a high unmet need for salvage therapies. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) reduces intracranial failure but used less frequently due to cognitive consequences. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt cancer cell division and have shown improved survival and safety in patients with glioblastoma and metastatic NSCLC. Phase 3 METIS trial [NCT02831959] aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TTFields therapy in NSCLC patients with BM treated with SRS, specifically in terms of lengthening time to intracranial progression without cognitive decline. Methods: Mutation negative (M-) NSCLC patients with 1–10 BM were randomized 1:1 to receive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) followed by Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields; 150 kHz) therapy with best supportive care (BSC) or SRS followed by BSC. Patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70, newly diagnosed with one inoperable or 2–10 supra-/infratentorial brain metastases suitable for SRS and receiving optimal extracranial disease therapy were included. Exclusions were prior WBRT and single operable or recurrent brain metastases. Primary endpoint was time to first intracranial progression (RANO-BM) based on cumulative risk. Patients were followed every two months until second intracranial progression. Cognition and patient quality of life (QoL) were evaluated. Results: Between July 2016 and September 2022, 298 patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were balanced: median age was 63.5 (range 37-84) years, 37.6% females, majority of patients had a KPS ≥ 80, median time from initial NSCLC diagnosis was 1.8 months (range: 0.2-55.7), 77% had adenocarcinoma. Median treatment duration of TTFields was 16 weeks, with a median usage time of 67%. Primary endpoint, time to intracranial progression from SRS, was significantly prolonged with SRS followed by TTFields therapy with BSC vs. TTFields plus BSC arm (median of 21.9 vs. 11.3 months); HR=0.67 [0.48-0.93], p=0.02. TTFields-related AEs were mainly dermatological, and Grade ≤2. TTFields therapy also improved deterioration-free survival of global health status, physical functioning, and fatigue according to QoL, and did not negatively impact cognition. Conclusions: METIS study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating that TTFields therapy following SRS in mutation negative NSCLC patients with BM, significantly prolongs time to intracranial progression and could postpone WBRT, without QoL and cognition decline. Clinical trial information: NCT02831959 .

Brain metastases in patients with pleural mesothelioma receiving dual checkpoint blockade compared to single-agent checkpoint blockade or chemotherapy.

e20093 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) has emerged as a treatment option in pleural mesothelioma (PM). Historically, brain metastases (BM) in PM were rare, thus brain imaging is not routine practice or included in guidelines. We characterize the incidence of BMs by type of treatment received. Methods: In this retrospective analysis,adult patients with PM treated at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 1/1/2015- 8/31/2023 were included. Patient demographic data, treatment, brain imaging and clinical history were extracted from the electronic medical record.A two-tailed Z score with alpha 0.05 was used to determine a difference in proportion of patients with BM by treatment group. Results: 290 patients were included in the study. 154 (53.1%) were treated with chemotherapy (CT), 94 (32.4%) were treated with pembrolizumab (pembro), 39 (13.4%) were treated with ipilimumab + nivolumab (ipi/nivo), and 3 (1.0%) were treated with another IO. A higher proportion of patients treated with ipi/nivo developed BM compared to those treated with pembro alone (4/39, 10.3% vs 2/94, 2.1%; Z score p= 0.038). None of the 154 patients treated with CT developed BM. All BMs were detected due to symptoms. Of the six patients that developed BM, the median age was 72.5 (range 47-80), 83% were male, 67% identified as Caucasian, and there was an even distribution of histology with 33% each of epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid. All patients received IO most recently or were currently on it when BM developed. Median time to BM from start of immunotherapy was 144.5 days (range 2-913 days). On imaging, all 6 patients had edema surrounding the brain metastases and 4 also showed hemorrhage. Survival after development of BM was poor (Table1). Four patients (67%) underwent surgery for the BM, while all patients received brain radiation. Two patients received whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), while four patients received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to a median of four brain metastases (range 1-7). Three patients developed subsequent intracranial progression (out-of-field) including one with rapid intracranial progression 20 days post-radiation. Conclusions: In this large retrospective study of patients with PM treated with systemic therapy, BM was most prevalent in those patients receiving ipi/nivo compared to pembro alone and not seen in those receiving chemotherapy. The presence of edema suggests a possible immune infiltrate while on IO (correlative studies in progress). Brain imaging should be considered prior to starting IO in patients with PM. [Table: see text]

Intracranial outcomes with ipilimumab and nivolumab in melanoma brain metastases following progression on anti-PD-1 therapy.

9555 Background: Ipilimumab + nivolumab (ipi/nivo) is effective for melanoma brain metastases (MBM), but the efficacy of ipi/nivo in MBM in patients (pts) whose melanoma has progressed on anti-PD-1 is unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of pts with progressive MBM who received ipi/nivo at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center following prior anti-PD-1. Cohort A included pts with ≥1 untreated MBM (≥5mm) without local interventions (such as neurosurgery, radiotherapy). Cohort B included pts who had received local interventions for all MBMs before starting ipi/nivo. The primary endpoint was intracranial (IC) progression free survival (PFS). IC response was assessed based on clinical radiological interpretation for Cohort A. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate time-to-event outcomes. Results: Fifty-seven pts were identified: 28 and 29 in Cohort A and B, respectively. All pts had received prior anti-PD-1, 42% prior ipi, a median of 2 (IQR: 1, 3) prior lines, and 21% (12/57) of pts prior treatment was in the adjuvant setting only. 79% (45/57) of pts had cutaneous, 14% (8/57) acral, 5% (3/57) unknown primary and 2% (1/57) mucosal melanoma. Median age was 64 (IQR: 58, 71) and 55 (IQR: 47, 70) years in Cohort A and B, respectively. Cohort A had median lesion size (largest measurable MBM) of 1.0cm (IQR: 0.60, 2.12), and 64% (18/28) of pts had &gt;5 lesions; Cohort B had a median lesion size 1.5cm (IQR: 1.10, 2.00) and 28% (8/29) of pts had &gt;5 lesions. 14% (8/57) of pts received concurrent steroid (equivalent of ≥dexamethasone 4mg daily) upon starting ipi/nivo, and leptomeningeal disease was present in 14% (4/28) and 7% (2/29) of Cohort A and B, respectively. The IC response rate was 11% (3/28, 2 were complete (CR)) in Cohort A.Both patients with CR were asymptomatic with ≤ 2 lesions and no prior CTLA-4 exposure. Most (20/28, 71%) in Cohort A had best response of progressive disease (PD); all that had a best response of stable disease (SD; 5/28, 18%) sustained that response for less than 6 months. Median IC-PFS was 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3,4.4) and 7.6 (95% CI: 3.6, -) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 6.7 (95% CI: 3.6,10) and 24 (95% CI: 11, -) months in Cohort A and B. 24-month OS was 19% (95% CI: 8.1,45) and 51% (95% CI: 35,75) in Cohort A and B. 30% (8/27) and 66% (19/29) of pts had subsequent systemic therapy, and 48% (13/27) and 52% (15/29) subsequent local therapy in Cohorts A and B. Conclusions: Ipi/nivo has limited efficacy in patients with progressive MBM post-PD-1 therapy in the absence of local therapy. These results highlight the unmet clinical need for more effective therapies to address progressive MBM post-PD-1 therapy, an increasingly relevant clinical scenario particularly in light of the growing use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant anti-PD-1.

Breaking barriers: Real-world data on immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with large brain metastases.

e14002 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with large brain metastases (BrM) defined as &gt; 2 cm historically face grim prognoses. Immunotherapy, emerging as a state-of-the-art treatment in NSCLC treatment, has not been extensively studied in the context of large BrM. The use of immunotherapy in these patients is complicated by factors such as steroids use and local interventions like surgery and/or radiation treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study across three MedStar Georgetown Cancer Network sites to evaluate outcomes in NSCLC patients with large BrM. Inclusion criteria comprised of patients aged 18 years or older with NSCLC diagnosed between 01/01/17 to 12/31/2022 who started immunotherapy after the diagnosis of at least one BrM 2 cm or more in diameter. Intracranial progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and relevant clinical factors were analyzed. Steroid use was not included due to documentation limitations. Cox penalized regression was used to assess PFS and OS while power analysis was not done due to the sample size. Results: The study included 36 patients all of whom underwent neurosurgery and/or radiation before starting immunotherapy. Median follow up duration was 17.6 months. The population was 58.3% female, median age 64.4 years, 77.8% lung adenocarcinoma, 91.7% received pembrolizumab for immunotherapy, and median duration of immunotherapy was 178 days. Median intracranial PFS was 9.2 months and median OS reached 31 months. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0.07 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.26) for intracranial PFS in patients who received at least 90 days of immunotherapy compared to those who received less than 90 days of immunotherapy. Each additional 30 days of immunotherapy was associated with an OS HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.90). Higher PD-L1 status was not associated with improved outcomes. Conclusions: The study highlights the potential of immunotherapy as a valuable treatment for NSCLC patients with large BrM, a population often excluded from clinical trials. In our retrospective analysis, extended immunotherapy demonstrated positive impacts on both intracranial PFS and OS. Future directions should focus on prospective evaluation of the optimal timing of immunotherapy relative to upfront large BrM treatment, with a specific emphasis on understanding the role of steroids dosing in this context.

High PD-L1 expression among patients with ALK rearranged non–small cell lung cancer and response to first line ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

8626 Background: Patients with ALK rearrangements are highly responsive to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Negative prognostic markers to ALK TKIs include TP53 alterations and ALK Variants 3a/b. The prognostic role that PD-L1 expression plays in first line ALK TKI outcomes is less clear. Methods: Retrospective review of patients with metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC seen between 2015 - 2022 at the University of Colorado who received first line ALK TKIs was performed. PD-L1 expression was denoted as high (≥50%) or low (&lt; 1% or 1-49%) based on pre-treatment biopsies. Clinicopathologic features, treatment outcomes, and genomic data were collected. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan Meier methods. Multivariate modeling adjusted for brain metastases, TP53 mutations, ALK variant status, and ALK TKI. PD-L1 was overexpressed in EML4-ALK murine cell lines with lentiviruses. In vitro and in vivo response to ALK TKIs were compared to non-infected cell lines. Neutrophils and lymphocytes were quantified on pre-treatment H&amp;E slides. Results: Baseline characteristics of 130 patients are shown. Median PFS was significantly (p &lt; 0.001) longer in the PD-L1 low cohort than the PD-L1 high cohort (21 vs 11 mos, HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29 – 0.66). There was no difference in OS between the PD-L1 low and PD-L1 high cohort (p = 0.4, 107 vs 91 mos, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.46 – 1.61). In an alectinib sub-group analysis (n = 89), PD-L1 high expressers had a higher rate of CNS progression (93.0 vs 73.9%, p = 0.022). Forced overexpression of PD-L1 in murine EML4-ALK cell lines exerted no difference to in vitroor in vivo response to alectinib. Pre-treatment biopsies from the PD-L1 high cohort (n = 19) revealed significantly more neutrophils (p = 0.021), but not lymphocytes (p = 0.904). Conclusions: High PD-L1 expression (≥50%) is associated with worse PFS and higher intracranial progression rate among those receiving ALK TKIs. Induced PD-L1 expression in ALK cell lines did not alter in vitro or in vivo ALK TKI sensitivity. Higher neutrophil counts track with high PD-L1 expression (≥50%), suggesting that differences within the immune tumor microenvironment may be relevant. [Table: see text]

Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study.

Lorlatinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial activity versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced, ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase III CROWN study. Here, we report long-term outcomes from CROWN after 5 years of follow-up. Two hundred ninety-six patients with ALK-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (n = 149) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (n = 147). This post hoc analysis presents updated investigator-assessed efficacy outcomes, safety, and biomarker analyses. With a median follow-up for PFS of 60.2 and 55.1 months, respectively, median PFS was not reached (NR [95% CI, 64.3 to NR]) with lorlatinib and 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 10.9) with crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.27]); 5-year PFS was 60% (95% CI, 51 to 68) and 8% (95% CI, 3 to 14), respectively. Median time to intracranial progression was NR (95% CI, NR to NR) with lorlatinib and 16.4 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 21.9) with crizotinib (HR, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.12]). Safety profile was consistent with that in prior analyses. Emerging new ALK resistance mutations were not detected in circulating tumor DNA collected at the end of lorlatinib treatment. After 5 years of follow-up, median PFS has yet to be reached in the lorlatinib group, corresponding to the longest PFS ever reported with any single-agent molecular targeted treatment in advanced NSCLC and across all metastatic solid tumors. These results coupled with prolonged intracranial efficacy and absence of new safety signals represent an unprecedented outcome for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC and set a new benchmark for targeted therapies in cancer.

Stereotactic radiotherapy vs whole brain radiation therapy in EGFR mutated NSCLC: Results & reflections from the prematurely closed phase III HYBRID trial

BackgroundAll known randomized trials of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) versus whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs) comprise mixed histologies. The phase III HYBRID trial (NCT02882984) attempted to evaluate the non-inferiority of SRT vs. WBRT specifically for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRm NSCLC) BMs. MethodsInclusion criteria were ≤ 5 BMs (any size) from treatment-naïve EGFRm NSCLC. All patients started a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor on the first day of WBRT (37.5 Gy/15 fractions) or SRT (25–40 Gy/5 fractions per tumor volume). The primary endpoint was 18-month intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS; intention-to-treat). ResultsThe trial commenced in June 2015 and was closed in April 2021 after screening 208 patients but enrolling 85 (n = 41 WBRT, n = 44 SRT; median follow-up 31 and 36 months, respectively). Respectively, 9.5 % vs. 10.2 % of patients experienced intracranial progression at 18 months, and the median iPFS was 21.4 vs. 22.3 months (p > 0.05 for all). The SRT arm experienced higher overall survival and cognitive preservation (p < 0.05 for all). The most notable reason for low enrollment was patients not wishing to risk neurocognitive decline from WBRT. ConclusionsAlthough this phase III trial was underpowered, there was no evidence that SRT yielded outcome detriments compared to WBRT for EGFRm NSCLC BMs. Lessons from prematurely closed trials are valuable, as they often provide important experiential perspectives for investigators designing/executing future trials. In the current era, randomized trials involving WBRT without cognitive sparing measures may be at high risk of underaccrual; trial investigators are encouraged to carefully consider our experience when attempting to design such trials. However, trials of molecular-/biologically-stratified patients are highly recommended as the notion of “individualized medicine/oncology” continues to expand.

Abstract PO5-16-10: The efficacy of novel antibody-drug-conjugates on brain metastases in metastatic breast cancer patients – a multicenter real-world analysis

Abstract 15 – 30% of all patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) develop brain metastases (BMs). Treatment of BMs include radiation therapy and surgical resection while systemic treatment is challenging and prospective evidence for the treatment of active brain metastases is restricted to the small molecule Tucatinib. Recently, the antibody-drug-conjugates (ADCs) Sacituzumab-Govitecan (SG) and Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-DXd) have shown to be highly effective in the treatment of triple-negative (SG), HER2-positive (T-DXd) and HR+/HER2- (SG and, in case of HER2-low-expression, T-DxD) MBC. However, there is only limited data, whether these macromolecules are also effective in patients with BMs. We therefore aimed to examine the efficacy of SG and T-DXd in patients with stable and active BMs in a multicenter real-world analysis. Female patients with stable or active BMs who were treated with either SG or T-DXd at the breast centers of Tuebingen University, Ulm University or Freiburg University in Germany before June 30, 2023 were included into this analysis. Data cut-off for this analysis was July 10, 2023. BMs were classified as active if they were newly diagnosed and did not require local treatment or if they were progressing and did not require local treatment. Preexisting BMs without intracranial disease progression or preexisting/newly diagnosed BMs that had been treated by surgery and/or radiotherapy directly prior to SG/T-DXd therapy were considered as stable. All patients underwent baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and received follow-up MRIs at least every three months. Growth dynamics of BMs were assessed by board certified neuroradiologists. Intracranial disease control rate (icDCR) was defined as the percentage of patients with at least intracranial stable disease at the first follow-up MRI. Intracranial progression-free survival (icPFS) was determined as the period between the first application of SG or T-DXd and intracranial disease progression or treatment cessation due to the patients’ will or the onset of intolerable toxicity. If ADC treatment was discontinued due to extracranial disease progression albeit at least stable intracranial disease patients were censored. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period between the first application of SG or T-DXd and death. In total, 26 patients were included with a median of two prior therapy lines in the metastatic setting (range 2 – 15). 10 (38%) and 14 (54%) patients received SG and T-DXd, respectively. 2/26 (8%) patients receiving SG were consecutively subjected to T-DXd treatment. SG was applied to 12/12 patients (100%) due to triple-negative MBC and 12/16 patients (75%) treated with T-DXd were HER2-positive. The remaining 4/16 patients (25%) treated with T-DXd showed HER2 low tumor biology. 5/12 (42%) and 8/16 (50%) patients treated with SG or T-DXd had active BMs at treatment initiation. The icDCR was 33% (95% CI: 5% - 61%)/81% (95% CI: 62% - 100%) for all patients treated with SG/T-DXd and 40% (95% CI: 0% - 88%)/75% (95% CI: 43% - 100%) in case of active BMs. After a median follow-up of 7.2 months, 10/12 (83.3%) patients treated with SG and 4/16 (25%) patients subjected to T-DXd had discontinued treatment. Median icPFS was 3.1 months (95% CI: 0.4 – 5.8 months) for SG and not reached for T-DXd. 7/12 (58%) patients treated with SG and 4/16 patients (25%) treated with T-DXd died until data cut-off. Median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI: 3.0 – 11.4 months) for patients treated with SG and not reached for patients treated with T-DXd. SG and T-DXd showed promising clinical activity in both, stable and active cerebral breast cancer metastasis. Updated PFS and OS data will be reported at the meeting. Citation Format: Dominik Dannehl, Henning Schäffler, Tobias Engler, Lea Volmer, Arne Estler, Ilinca Popp, Stefanie Lorenz, Eva-Maria Grischke, Markus Hahn, Ghazaleh Tabatabai, Ingolf Juhasz-Böss, Wolfgang Janni, Sara Brucker, Florin-Andrei Taran, Andreas Hartkopf. The efficacy of novel antibody-drug-conjugates on brain metastases in metastatic breast cancer patients – a multicenter real-world analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-16-10.