Intracoronary Abciximab Administration Research Articles

541 A CASE REPORT OF ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME: VERY LATE STENT THROMBOSIS DUE TO MAJOR STENT MALAPPOSITION

Abstract Rational The occurrence of stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare event, but it remains one of the most catastrophic complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Coronary angiography has limited value in differentiating the causative factors responsible for ST. Technical resolutions We report a case of a 78-year-old male, hypertensive and dyslipidemic who underwent PCI with stenting of the mid left anterior descending artery (LAD) due to chronic coronary syndrome (CCD) two years before. He was admitted to our emergency department for syncopal episode occurred at rest followed by chest pain radiating to the left arm and to the neck. At the time of admission, his electrocardiogram showed diffuse ST-segment elevation in V2-V6 and DI-aVL, therefore patient was urgently sent to the cath lab. Coronary angiography showed LAD occlusion at the proximal edge of the previously implanted stent with TIMI flow grade 0 and TIMI thrombus grade 5. Multiple thrombus aspiration passes were performed with distal flow restoration, followed by intracoronary abciximab administration. After additional thrombus aspiration passes, ST-segment resolution was observed and chest pain improved significantly. OCT imaging of mid-to-proximal LAD was then performed to better characterize the cause of thrombosis. OCT revealed in stent-thrombosis with mixed thrombus (6 mm length, arc >270°) associated with major stent malapposition (maximum malapposition distance: 1.3 mm) at the proximal edge of the previous implanted stent, without evidence of neoatherosclerosis and/or residual disease with unstable features at the stent edges. Additional thrombus aspiration was performed, further reducing the thrombotic burden. As te patient was hemodynamically stable and asymptomatic, with TIMI flow grade 3 at coronary angiography, we decided to start dual antiplatelet therapy (ASA+ticagrelor) plus continuous heparin i.v. infusion, and to defer PCI, planning a control coronary angiography after 72 hours. After 72 hours, OCT revealed almost complete thrombus resolution, and guided PCI with a 4.0/8 mm everolimus-eluting stent in overlap with the previously implanted stent, postdilated with a 4.5 semi-compliant balloon at 18 atm. Revascularization was completed with an OCT-guided PCI of the proximal left circumflex during the same procedure. Clinical implications Our case demonstrates the utility of OCT in determining thrombus burden and assessing the causes of late stent failure, guiding PCI. In this case, OCT was useful as diagnostic tool to identify the mechanism underlying the very-late ST, and as guidance for treatment. It enabled to exclude neoatherosclerosis and/or unstable plaques at stent edges, leaving us more confident to defer PCI after 72 h of antithrombotic therapy. Perspectives The occurrence of ST is rare, but it remains one of the most catastrophic complications following PCI. Coronary angiography has limited value in differentiating the causative factors responsible for ST, while OCT allows to detect and characterize the causes of stent thrombosis (i.e., evaluate thrombus burden, presence of neoatherosclerosis, stent malapposition/underxpansion, uncovred stent struts, significant disease and/or unstable plaques at the stent edges, etc.). A better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanism underlying ST is an important clinical need. The increasing availability of high-resolution intravascular imaging techniques such as OCT provides new opportunities for tailoring treatment strategy and guiding PCI.

Intracoronary abciximab in diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BackgroundAlthough intracoronary abciximab failed to improve prognosis compared with intravenous route in unselected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, little is known about the role of intracoronary abciximab in diabetic patients. ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of intracoronary abciximab administration in diabetic patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MethodsReperfusional and clinical outcomes of intracoronary abciximab compared with intravenous bolus abciximab according to diabetic status were evaluated in a pooled analysis of five randomized trials including 3158 STEMI patients. The primary clinical endpoint of the study was the composite of death or reinfarction at 30-day follow-up. ResultsAmong 584 diabetic patients (18.5%), the composite of death or reinfarction was significantly reduced with intracoronary abciximab compared to intravenous abciximab (4.7% vs. 8.8%; rate ratio [RR], 0.50; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.26–0.99; p=0.04), driven by numerically lower deaths (3.7% vs. 6.4%; RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.26–1.20; p=0.13). Moreover, a significant reduction in definite or probable stent thrombosis was observed in patients receiving intracoronary abciximab (1% vs. 3.5%; RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.07–0.99; p=0.04). Although formal tests for interaction were not significant, no clinical benefit was apparent in the cohort of STEMI patients without diabetes (n=2574). ConclusionsIn diabetic patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, intracoronary abciximab may improve clinical outcomes as compared with standard intravenous use. These findings require confirmation in a dedicated randomized trial.

Similar anti-inflammatory effects of intracoronary and intravenous Abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Intracoronary Abciximab administration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) could offer theoretical advantages over the intravenous route. Besides antiplatelet effects, Abciximab can modulate inflammation via cross-reactivity with GPIIb/IIIa, avb3, and aMb2 receptors. The aim of our study was to assess whether the Abciximab administration route could influence its anti-inflammatory effects. Eighty-nine consecutive ST elevation myocardial infarction patient candidates for pPCI were randomized to intracoronary (Group A-47 patients) or intravenous (Group B-42 patients) Abciximab bolus administration. The primary endpoint was the extent of inflammation, measured by C-reactive protein (CRP), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) and inter-cellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) levels. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01757457. Data are expressed in medians (interquartiles). In both groups, troponin levels were similar [baseline: 0.12 (0.03-0.94) vs. 0.27 (0.07-1.24) ng/ml, P = 0.73; postprocedural: 22.00 (14.75-69.43) vs. 31.96 (8.23-7.20) ng/ml, P = 0.83]. Both groups also showed similar baseline [0.31 (0.14-0.69) vs. 0.22 (0.09-0.59) mg/ml, P = 0.80] and postprocedural CRP levels [2.28 (1.37-4.23) vs. 2.16 (1.15-3.22) mg/dl, P = 0.69], similar baseline [272.5 (224.7-340.8) vs. 262.2 (221.2-306.4) ng/ml, P = 0.33] and postprocedural soluble ICAM-1 levels [281.5 (244.6-337.4) vs. 287.2 (226.9-359.2) ng/ml P = 0.71], and similar baseline [771.6 (620.9-971.0) vs. 748.6 (592.2-838.8) ng/ml, P = 0.30] and postprocedural soluble VCAM-1 levels [785.2 (671.6-947.1) vs. 745.9 (641.1-841.9) ng/ml, P = 0.17]. In-hospital and 6-month event rates were similar in the two groups. Our study suggests that Abciximab has similar anti-inflammatory effects irrespective of the administration route. It is unlikely that the potential clinical benefits of intracoronary Abciximab can be related to modulation of integrin receptors.

Off-target effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors

Soon after identification of the platelet membrane glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa, it has become a target of antiplatelet therapy. There are 3 intravenous GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, namely- eptifibatide, tirofiban and abciximab, used in the contemporary clinical practice, particularly in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of the current review is to summarize available knowledge concerning off-target effects of GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. All 3 drugs have similar antithrombotic properties, but differ with respect to pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and off-target effects. Eptifibatide and tirofiban are highly specific GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, while abciximab is unselectiveand cross-reacts with integrin avb3 - a vitronectin receptor and leukocyte-associatedi ntegrin Mac-1. As a result of these interactions, abciximab seems to reduce the development of clinical restenosis, decrease infarct size, inhibit adhesion of monocytes to medical steel and modulate the inflammatory response. Intracoronary administration of abciximab provides higher drug concentration in the target area, increasing dose-dependent interactions with other integrins. Off-target effects of small molecule GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (i.e. eptifibatide and tirofiban) are predominantly connected with their suppressive influence on the inflammatory response. All in all, although GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors are not recommended as a routine therapy during PCI, their antiplatelet properties and potential off-target effects may bebeneficial in certain subsets of patients.

Abciximab in the management of acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: evidence-based treatment, current clinical use, and future perspectives.

Introduction of antiplatelet agents has contributed substantially to improve the outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Meta-analysis of the studies on abciximab administration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has clearly confirmed the mortality benefit associated with intravenous bolus and infusion of abciximab compared to placebo. Recently, introduction of new oral P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor), with a faster and more pronounced antiplatelet effect, have decreased the use of abciximab even in patients with STEMI. However, recent studies have shown a delayed onset of antiplatelet effect of new oral antiplatelet drugs in the setting of STEMI, especially in patients with hemodynamic compromise. Thus, the use of abciximab as an intravenous agent should be strongly considered when oral P2Y12 inhibitors might fail or cannot be given before primary PCI for STEMI. An additional benefit of abciximab administration was reported when abciximab was given early, before primary PCI, compared to typical periprocedural use. To the contrary, no clear clinical benefit was confirmed for intracoronary administration of abciximab compared with intravenous administration. Future studies should focus on the role of abciximab given on top of new oral P2Y12 inhibitor (prasugrel, ticagrelor) or used as an alternative to an intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor (cangrelor). Undoubtedly, the results of these studies will change everyday practice of STEMI treatment.

A Review of Intracoronary Abciximab in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions- where are we now and where do we go from here?

The rationale for intracoronary administration of abciximab is discussed. The data on use of intracoronary abciximab in percutaneous coronary interventions in acute coronary syndromes and STEMI are reviewed. Evaluation of the niche where intracoronary administration of abciximab may be useful and future research into the subject and relevant patents are discussed.

Efficacy of Combination of Intracoronary Abciximab Administration and Aspiration Thrombectomy on Myocardial Perfusion As Assessed by Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Coronary Stenting

Efficacy of Combination of Intracoronary Abciximab Administration and Aspiration Thrombectomy on Myocardial Perfusion As Assessed by Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Coronary Stenting

Retraction: Notice of unreliable findings

The aim of this study was to perform an individual patient-level pooled analysis of randomised trials, comparing intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab bolus use in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Abciximab represents a cornerstone in the treatment of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Intracoronary abciximab bolus administration has been proposed as an alternative strategy to the standard intravenous route. However, whether intracoronary abciximab effectively improves clinical outcomes compared with standard route remains unknown. Individual data of 1198 patients enrolled in five trials were entered into the pooled analysis. The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of all-cause death and reinfarction at 30-day follow-up. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, reinfarction and target-vessel revascularisation (TVR). No significant heterogeneity was found across trials. Compared with the intravenous route, intracoronary abciximab administration significantly reduced the risk of the composite of death and reinfarction (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.94; p=0.03), death (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.95; p=0.04) and TVR (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.99; p=0.045), without a significant impact on the risk of reinfarction (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.21; p=0.13). However, after correction for baseline differences, only the composite of death/reinfarction and death remained significant. In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, intracoronary abciximab administration, when compared with the intravenous standard route, can improve short-term clinical outcomes mainly by reducing the risk of death.

Benefits from intracoronary as compared to intravenous abciximab administration for STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty: A meta-analysis of 8 randomized trials

BackgroundAdjunctive abciximab administration has been demonstrated to reduce mortality and reinfarction in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) referred to invasive management. Standard abciximab regimen consists of an intravenous (IV) bolus followed by a 12-h IV infusion. Experimental studies and small clinical trials suggest the superiority of intracoronary (IC) injection of abciximab over IV route. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials (RCTs) to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of IC vs IV abciximab administration in STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty. MethodsWe obtained results from all RCTs enrolling STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary endpoint was mortality, while recurrent myocardial infarction, postprocedural epicardial (TIMI 3) and myocardial (MBG 2–3) perfusion were identified as secondary endpoints. The safety endpoint was the risk of major bleeding complications. ResultsA total of 8 randomized trials were finally included in the meta-analysis, enrolling a total of 3259 patients. As compared to IV route, IC abciximab was associated with a significant improvement in myocardial perfusion (OR [95% CI]=1.76 [1.28–2.42], p<0.001), without significant benefits in terms of mortality (OR [95% CI]=0.85 [0.59–1.23], p=0.39), reinfarction (OR [95% CI]=0.79 [0.46–1.33], p=0.37), or major bleeding complications (OR [95% CI]=1.19 [0.76–1.87], p=0.44). However, we observed a significant relationship between patient's risk profile and mortality benefits from IC abciximab administration (p=0.011). ConclusionsThe present updated meta-analysis showed that IC administration of abciximab is associated with significant benefits in myocardial perfusion, but not in clinical outcome at short-term follow-up as compared to IV abciximab administration, without any excess of major bleedings in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. However, a significant relationship was observed between patient's risk profile and mortality benefits from IC abciximab administration. Therefore, waiting for long-term follow-up results and additional randomized trials, IC abciximab administration cannot be routinely recommended, but may be considered in high-risk patients.

Intracoronary administration of abciximab via an intracoronary perfusion catheter in patients with a thrombotic coronary occlusion—a single center experience

Aims: At concentrations superior to those achieved with the standard intravenous dose for coronary procedures, abciximab has an active dethrombotic effect by displacing platelet-bound fibrinogen. This analysis investigates whether administration of abciximab by local intracoronary infusion through the ClearWay (CX) RX perfusion catheter improves coronary blood flow (TIMI flow) by reducing thrombus burden. Methods and Results: This retrospective study included 68 patients who presented with an acute coronary syndrome due to an intracoronary thrombus between May 2009 and April 2011. The primary endpoint was defined as improvement in Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow after intracoronary application of abciximab via the ClearWay (CW) RX perfusion catheter. The population (mean age 58±11 years) consisted of 54 patients (79%) with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction and 14 patients (21%) with a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The balloon-diameter of the perfusion catheter was 1 mm in 25 (37%), 1.5 mm in 23 (34%), 2.0 mm in 14 (20%), and 3.0 mm in 6 patients (9%), respectively. Successful positioning of the balloon within the thrombus was not possible in 4 patients (6%). After infusion of abciximab using the perfusion catheter TIMI flow improved by one grade in 17 patients (25%), by two grades in 9 patients (13%), and by three grades in 7 patients (10%), TIMI flow remained unchanged in 21 patients (31%), and even worsened by one grade in 4 patient (6%) (χ test, Pb.001). The procedure was complicated by an air embolization in 5 patients (7%). Air embolization occurred using a 2 mm balloon (three patients) or a 3 mm balloon (two patients), but not using a 1 mm or 1.5 mm balloon (χ, Pb.003). After the use of the perfusion catheter in these patients TIMI flow improved by one degree in 2 of these patients, was unchanged in 2 of these patients and worsened by one grade in one patient. After additional treatment with thrombectomy (54 patients, 79%), initial balloon dilatation (46 patients, 68%), direct stenting (22 patients, 32%), and stent implantation (64 patients, 94%), the final TIMI flow was TIMI 3 in 57 patients (84%), TIMI 2 in 4 patients (6%), TIMI 1 in 6 patients (9%), and TIMI 0 in 1 patient (1%). Conclusion: The intracoronary infusion of abciximab using the ClearWay (CX) RX perfusion catheter helps to improve myocardial perfusion in patients with acute coronary syndrome due to an intracoronary thrombus. The use of perfusion catheters with a balloon ≥2 mm can be associated with air embolism.

Combined treatment of thrombotic coronary occlusions by thrombectomy and by intracoronary administration of abciximab via an intracoronary perfusion catheter—which treatment first?

Combined treatment of thrombotic coronary occlusions by thrombectomy and by intracoronary administration of abciximab via an intracoronary perfusion catheter—which treatment first?

Clinical efficacy and safety of intracoronary vs. intravenous abciximab administration in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Adjunctive therapy with abciximab has been proven to reduce mortality and reinfarction in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) referred to invasive management. Standard abciximab regimen consists of an intravenous (IV) bolus followed by a 12-h IV infusion. Experimental studies and small clinical trials suggest the superiority of intracoronary (IC) injection of abciximab over the IV route. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of IC vs. IV abciximab administration in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The primary endpoint was mortality, while recurrent myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were selected as secondary endpoints. The safety endpoint was the risk of major bleeding complications. A total of six randomized trials were finally included in the meta-analysis, enrolling a total of 1246 patients. Compared to IV route, IC abciximab was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.43 [0.20 − 0.94], p = 0.03), and TVR (OR [95% CI] = 0.53 [0.29 − 0.99], p = 0.05). No differences in terms of recurrent myocardial infarction (OR [95% CI] = 0.54 [0.23 − 1.28], p = 0.17) or major bleeding complications (OR [95% CI] = 0.91 [0.46 − 1.79], p = 0.79) were observed between the two strategies. The present meta-analysis showed that IC administration of abciximab is associated with significant benefits in mortality at short-term follow-up compared to IV abciximab administration, without any excess of major bleeding in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. However, further trials are warranted to establish the optimal strategy of abciximab treatment in this setting.

580 Intracoronary abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with reduced myocardial edema, myocardial hemorrhage and microvascular obstruction

580 Intracoronary abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with reduced myocardial edema, myocardial hemorrhage and microvascular obstruction

Letter by Niccoli et al Regarding Article, “Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Administration of Abciximab in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Thrombus Aspiration: The Comparison of Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Abciximab Administration During Emergency Reperfusion of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (CICERO) Trial”

To the Editor: We read with great interest the article by Gu et al,1 who compared the effects of intracoronary abciximab versus intravenous administration on myocardial reperfusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration. They found that intracoronary administration of abciximab, compared with intravenous administration, did not improve the rate of successful myocardial reperfusion, as …

Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Administration of Abciximab in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Thrombus Aspiration

Background— Administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab is an effective adjunctive treatment strategy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Although small-scale studies have suggested beneficial effects of intracoronary over intravenous administration of abciximab, this has not been investigated in a medium-scale randomized clinical trial. Methods and Results— A total of 534 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration within 12 hours of symptom onset were randomized to either an intracoronary or an intravenous bolus of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg). Patients were pretreated with aspirin, heparin, and clopidogrel. The primary end point was the incidence of restored myocardial reperfusion, defined as complete ST-segment resolution. Secondary end points included myocardial reperfusion as assessed by myocardial blush grade, enzymatic infarct size, and major adverse cardiac events at 30 days. The incidence of complete ST-segment resolution was similar in the intracoronary and intravenous groups (64% versus 62%; P =0.562). However, the incidence of myocardial blush grade 2/3 was higher in the intracoronary group than in the intravenous group (76% versus 67%; P =0.022). Furthermore, enzymatic infarct size was smaller in the intracoronary than in the intravenous group ( P =0.008). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was similar in both groups (5.5% versus 6.1%; P =0.786). Conclusions— In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration, intracoronary administration of abciximab compared with intravenous administration does not improve myocardial reperfusion as assessed by ST-segment resolution. However, intracoronary administration is associated with improved myocardial reperfusion as assessed by myocardial blush grade and a smaller enzymatic infarct size. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00927615.

Use of antiplatelet therapies during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

Inhibition of platelet function is necessary to achieve successful and long-lasting primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction. For many years, antiplatelet therapy in the setting of primary PCI consisted of two drugs that inhibit platelet activation (aspirin and clopidogrel) and an intravenous blocker of platelet aggregation (abciximab). The development of new, more potent oral antiplatelet drugs (prasugrel and ticagrelor) as well as new data on clopidogrel dosing regimens limited the use of abciximab after pretreatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. Thus, intracoronary administration of abciximab and the use of small molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers (tirofiban or eptifibatide) challenge the contemporary schemes of antiplatelet treatment in primary PCI. We review recently published data with particular attention on patients and drug characteristics and propose an update of existing recommendations.

Delivery of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Therapy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

A major goal of any antithrombotic regimen administered during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preservation of coronary microvascular perfusion, which is critical for myocardial survival. In addition to macrovascular thrombosis, microembolization into the downstream coronary artery bed that occurs during spontaneous plaque rupture and PCI plays a prominent role in the development of microvascular dysfunction that leads to myocardial infarction. In addition to physical obstruction of the lumen by the embolus, vasoconstriction and edema due to inflammation also impair microvascular flow.1 These events likely occur more frequently during PCI performed in the setting of unstable coronary syndromes.2 With Doppler guidewire technology, it was estimated that an average of 25 embolic events occurred during primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.3 Article see p 784 Platelet aggregates are important components of coronary microemboli, along with leukocytes, erythrocytes, platelet-leukocyte aggregates, cholesterol crystals, and hyalin. Platelets and leukocytes within microemboli play a particularly important role in the pathophysiological changes of blood flow by promoting in situ microvascular thrombosis, vasoconstriction, and inflammation. Interestingly, the composition of the embolized material is similar in the settings of spontaneous and catheter-induced plaque rupture.1 In animal models, distal microembolization of inert microspheres is associated with an immediate reduction in flow due to vessel occlusion, followed by enhanced blood flow due to the effects of adenosine released from the embolized myocardium into the adjacent noninvolved myocardium.4 Microembolization results in overall reduced flow reserve and the progressive loss of contractile function, which often reverses within weeks. The degree of myocardial contractile dysfunction is disproportionate to the degree of infarction and is the result of inflammation.5 However, in the clinical condition, a more complex pathophysiology exists due to the influence of multiple components of the emboli. Platelets aggregate when fibrinogen binds to the active …

Intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the CICERO trial in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration

BackgroundAdministration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is an effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Recent small-scaled studies have suggested that intracoronary administration of abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is superior to conventional intravenous administration. This study has been designed to investigate whether intracoronary bolus administration of abciximab is more effective than intravenous bolus administration in improving myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration.Methods/DesignThe Comparison of IntraCoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during Emergency Reperfusion Of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CICERO) trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized open-label trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints. A total of 530 patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention are randomly assigned to either an intracoronary or intravenous bolus of weight-adjusted abciximab. The primary end point is the incidence of >70% ST-segment elevation resolution. Secondary end points consist of post-procedural residual ST-segment deviation, myocardial blush grade, distal embolization, enzymatic infarct size, in-hospital bleeding, and clinical outcome at 30 days and 1 year.DiscussionThe CICERO trial is the first clinical trial to date to verify the effect of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab on myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00927615

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the left main stem of a monocoronary artery

In a 71-year-old female with evolving anterior wall myocardial infarction, coronary angiography revealed a monocoronary artery which arose from the right sinus of Valsalva. Originating from a short common trunk, the left main stem showed a thrombotic lesion that occluded the left anterior descending coronary artery while the circumflex artery was obstructed. Intracoronary administration of abciximab, followed by stenting of the transition between the left anterior descending coronary artery and the main stem, and final kissing balloon inflation of the bifurcation resulted in an excellent angiographic result and favourable clinical outcome. (Neth Heart J 2009;17:274-6.).

The Optimal Route of Administration of the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonist Abciximab During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Intravenous Versus Intracoronary

The use of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist Abciximab has over the years become an important part of the anticoagulant regimen in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Abciximab is a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, but other mechanisms, such as suppression of the inflammatory pathways, have also been proposed to contribute to the benefits of Abciximab.The optimal route of administration, i.e. intravenous versus intracoronary, of the first dose has been questioned, but only tested in small, non-randomised and retrospective studies or studies with short follow-up. No definite conclusion can be made based on these studies.In this review we present the current knowledge published about the intracoronary administration of Abciximab including the mechanisms behind the potential beneficial effects, and the safety. The emphasis will be on clinical trials rather than on studies on the pharmacological mechanisms, as the latter have been reviewed thoroughly elsewhere.Our conclusion from this present review is that randomized trials of intracoronary versus intravenous bolus of Abciximab are needed.