Use Of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Research Articles

An explainable machine learning approach using contemporary UNOS data to identify patients who fail to bridge to heart transplantation

BackgroundThe use of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) and Impella devices as a bridge to heart transplantation (HTx) has increased significantly in recent times. This study aimed to create and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model that can predict the failure of status two listings and identify the clinical features that significantly impact this outcome.MethodsWe used the UNOS registry database to identify HTx candidates listed as UNOS Status 2 between 2018 and 2022 and supported with either Impella (5.0 or 5.5) or IABP. We used the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to build and validate ML models. We developed two models: (1) a comprehensive model that included all patients in our cohort and (2) separate models designed for each of the 11 UNOS regions.ResultsWe analyzed data from 4,178 patients listed as Status 2. Out of them, 12% had primary outcomes indicating Status 2 failure. Our ML models were based on 19 variables from the UNOS data. The comprehensive model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 (±0.03), with a range between 0.44 (±0.08) and 0.74 (±0.01) across different regions. The models' specificity ranged from 0.75 to 0.96. The top five most important predictors were the number of inotropes, creatinine, sodium, BMI, and blood group.ConclusionUsing ML is clinically valuable for highlighting patients at risk, enabling healthcare providers to offer intensified monitoring, optimization, and care escalation selectively.

Is there a role for intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with cardiogenic shock? predictors of success

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Hospital Clínico San Carlos Madrid. Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a clinical challenge associated with unacceptable high mortality rates. Early revascularization is the cornerstone for CS management. However, CS patients usually requires further advanced therapies such as vasopressors and mechanical circulatory support devices. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is not routinely used in patients with CS according to the current recommendations. However, this device could be associated with potential benefit in selected patients and we believe it is underutilized. Our aim was to assess for potential predictors of success after IABP implantation in patients with CS. Methods From 2013 to 2023, 136 consecutive patients diagnosed with CS and admitted to an Acute Cardiac Care Unit in a tertiary care hospital were recruited. Demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were retrospectively collected. SCAI classification was used to define shock state. Patient were followed-up to November-2023 and clinical events were also recorded. For purposes of analysis, patients were classified in two groups: IABP success (N=70) and IABP failure (N=66). Success, in terms of IABP use, was defined as patient’s survival to the index event. Failure of IABP was defined as in-hospital death. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential predictors of success. Results Mean age was 67.2±12.2 years and 64.7% were females. There were no significant differences in cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities between groups: hypertension (56.6% vs 43.5%, p 0.132), diabetes (40.9% vs 59.1%, p 0.088), chronic kidney disease (50% vs 50%, p 0.800), previous stroke (53.9% vs 41.2%, p 0.857) in "Success-group" vs "Failure-group" respectively. STEMI was the most frequent cause of CS requiring an IABP (65.9%). Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction was more common in the "Success-group", whereas cardiac arrest was more common in the "Failure-group" (Table 1). Regarding the CS classification, patients with IABP failure were more frequently in SCAI D and E categories (Table 1). In addition, patients in the failure-group had worse hemodynamic and analytic parameters (Table 1) and the IABP failed to significantly improve them. There were no significant differences in coronary artery disease burden and treatment. Complete revascularization was accomplished in a similar proportion of patients in both groups (Table 1). The multivariate analysis showed that SCAI B&C states were independently associated with success after IABP implantation, whereas lactate level prior to IABP implantation was associated with failure (Table 2). Conclusion Selecting the appropriate timing for IABP implantation is critical for the prognosis, as success rates are higher in less advanced stages of cardiogenic shock. Preimplantation lactate levels are also associated with success rates.

Outcomes of Patients Presenting with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Surgical Revascularization.

Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is a leading cause of emergency hospitalisation across Europe. This study evaluates the in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) following NSTEMI. A retrospective analysis of all cases undergoing isolated CABG following NSTEMI from September/2017 to September/2022 at our Centre. Patients were stratified according to in-hospital survival. Patient characteristics, operative details, and procedural complications were compared between those who survived and those who did not. Predictors of in-hospital and mid-term mortality were evaluated using logistic and Cox regression modelling. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to generate a survival curve for all alive patients at the time of discharge. Among 1011 patients (median age 64 [56 - 72] years, 852 [84.3%] male), 735 (72.7%) underwent urgent, 239 (23.6%) elective, and 37 (3.7%) emergency CABG. The in-hospital mortality was 1.5% (15/1011 patients). Those who died were more likely to be NYHA class III/IV, have LVEF <21%, severe renal impairment, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), or poor mobility. Emergency procedures, pre-operative ventilation, inotropic support, and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use were also more prevalent among those who died. Logistic regression modelling revealed new postoperative stroke (OR:22.0; 95% CI:3.6-135.5; p=0.001), pre-operative IABP use (11.4; 2.4-53.7; p=0.002), new haemodialysis (9.6; 2.7-34.7; p<0.001), PVD (5.6; 1.6-20.0; p=0.008), and poor mobility (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 1.3-18.2; p=0.022) as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, new postoperative stroke, pre-operative IABP use, new haemodialysis, PVD and poor mobility are independent predictors of mortality in NSTEMI patients undergoing isolated CABG.

B-55 | Trends and Outcomes of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Patients with Concomitant Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A 5-Year Cohort Study

B-55 | Trends and Outcomes of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Patients with Concomitant Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A 5-Year Cohort Study

"Effect of pulmonary artery catheterization in patients with non-ischemic cardiogenic shock: a nationwide analysis".

Pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) has been widely used in critically ill patients, yielding mixed results. Prior studies on cardiogenic shock (CS) predominantly included patients with acute myocardial infarction. This study aims to examine the effect of PAC use in patients with non-ischemic CS. This retrospective cohort study employed data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, including weighted hospitalizations of adult patients with non-ischemic CS during 2017 to 2019. In-hospital outcomes were compared between groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting. A total of 303,970 patients with non-ischemic CS were included, of whom 17.5% received a PAC during their hospitalization. The median age was 67 years (interquartile range: 57 - 77) and 61% were male. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, patients in the PAC group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (24.8% vs. 35.3%, p < 0.001), renal replacement therapy (10.7% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.002), in-hospital cardiac arrest (7.1% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001), and mechanical ventilation (44.6% vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001) compared to non-PAC group. In contrast, the PAC group had higher use of intra-aortic balloon pump (15.4% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), percutaneous ventricular assist devices (12.6% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3.9% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001), and heart transplantation (2.1% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001). In the real-world setting, invasive hemodynamic monitoring with PAC in patients with non-ischemic CS is associated with survival benefits and a reduction in adverse events, including reduced need for renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation and risk of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Impact of duration of cardiopulmonary bypass on recovery after open heart surgery

Background: Objective of the study was to examine the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration on recovery from cardiac surgery. Methods: This is an observational retrospective study. Data from adult cardiac surgical patients presented at Queen Alia Heart Institute (QAHI) in the duration between September 2023 and February 2024 was retrospectively analysed. The impact of CPB duration was examined. Patients were divided into groups according to CPB duration (0 to 60 minutes, 60 to 120 minutes, 120 to 180 minutes, 180 to 240 minutes and 240 to 300 minutes). For each group intra-operative and post-operative variable were examined. The intra-operative variables studied were need for blood transfusion, haemofiltration and intra-aortic balloon pump. The post-operative variables studied were duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospitalization time and mortality. Results: Consecutive data of 202 adult cardiac surgical patients (34 females and 168 males) was analysed. Average age of patients was 57.149 years. Average duration of CPB was 109.9 minutes (ranged from 29 to 300 minutes). Half of the patients (50.5%) had CPB duration between 1 and 2 hours. Blood transfusion was needed in 88 patients (43.6%). Haemofiltration was used in 32 patients (15.8%) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was used in 29 patients (14.4%). The average postoperative time of mechanical ventilation was 34 hours and the average ICU stay was 5.5 days. Chest re-exploration was needed in 30 patients (15%). Hospital stay was on average 12 days and in-hospital mortality was witnessed in 20 patients (9.9%). Patients who had CPB for less than one hour (17.3%) had the lowest incidence of blood transfusion (37.1%), lowest incidence of haemofiltration (8.6%), low incidence of IABP use (11%). They also had lowest incidence of chest re-opening (5.7%), shortest time of postoperative mechanical ventilation (13 hours) and shortest ICU and hospital stay (4.1 and 8.5 days, respectively). There was a significant increase in postoperative sternal re-opening and postoperative mortality when the duration of CPB exceeded 3 hours. Conclusions: Duration of CPB is a key predictor of recovery and outcome of cardiac surgery. Shorter CPB time was associated with earlier extubation, less ICU stay and shorter hospitalisation time. Prolonged CPB was associated with higher rates of complications, delayed recovery, longer ICU stay, protracted hospitalisation and higher mortality rates.

Twelve-year trends in unprotected left main coronary artery occlusion: insights from a real-world multicentre study.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) resulting from unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) occlusion and subtotal occlusion is a life-threatening condition. Although AMI management has improved in the past two decades, there is limited information on recent trends in patient characteristics, management, and outcomes for acute unprotected LMCA-related AMI. This study aims to assess such trends over a 12year period. This retrospective multicentre study includes patients with unprotected LMCA occlusion/subtotal occlusion admitted to three tertiary hospitals between 2008 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups based on the chronology of presentation: a 'past group' (January 2008 to December 2014) and a 'contemporary group' (January 2015 to December 2020). The study compares clinical characteristics, management approaches, and outcomes between the two groups. The study includes 128 patients, with 51 (40%) in the 'past group' and 77 (60%) in the 'contemporary group'. Baseline risk factors did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups, except for hypertension (49% vs. 74%; P=0.005). Chest pain was more frequent in the 'past group' (98% vs. 89%; P=0.014), and a trend towards more cardiac arrests was observed in the 'contemporary group' (18% vs. 31%; P=0.087). Revascularization type did not differ significantly (P=0.419), but manual thrombectomy was less frequently used (41% vs. 23%; P=0.032) and stent implantation showed a trend towards higher rates (66% vs. 78%; P=0.150) in the 'contemporary cohort'. There was a gradual shift from bare-metal to drug-eluting stents, with a significantly higher percentage of ticagrelor/prasugrel loading in the 'contemporary cohort' (5% vs. 79%; P<0.001). The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), although not statistically significant, was higher among patients in the 'past group' (67% vs. 51%; P=0.073). The type of MCS differed significantly between groups, with a decrease in intra-aortic balloon pump use (67% vs. 42%; P=0.005) and an increase in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (4% vs. 22%; P=0.005) and Impella system (0% vs. 3%) over time. Survival analysis showed no significant differences (P=0.599; log-rank test) in all-cause mortality between the different time groups, with the long-term survival rate being approximately 30%. In our real-world population, despite the progressive use of newer drugs and more advanced devices over time, patients with unprotected LMCA occlusion/subtotal occlusion remain a subpopulation with poor prognosis.

Intraoperative Use of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump to Generate Pulsatile Flow During Heart Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.

The physiologic impact of pulsatile flow (PF) on end-organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is controversial. Using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) to maintain PF during CPB for patients undergoing heart transplantation (HT) may impact end-organ perfusion, with implications for postoperative outcomes. A single-center retrospective study of 76 patients bridged to HT with IABP was conducted between January 2018 and December 2022. Beginning in May 2022, patients received IABP-generated PF during CPB at an internal rate of 80 beats/minute. Fifty-eight patients underwent HT with the IABP turned off (IABP-Off), whereas 18 patients underwent HT with IABP-generated PF (IABP-On). The unmatched IABP-On group experienced shorter organ ischemia times (180 vs. 203 minutes, p = 0.015) and CPB times (104 vs. 116 minutes, p = 0.022). The cohort was propensity matched according to age, organ ischemia time, and CPB time. Elevations in postoperative lactates in the immediate (2.8 vs. 1.5, p = 0.062) and 24 hour (4.7 vs. 2.4, p = 0.084) postoperative periods trended toward significance in the matched IABP-Off group. There was no difference in postoperative vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), postoperative creatinine, or length of stay. This limited preliminary data suggest that maintaining counterpulsation to generate PF during CPB may improve end-organ perfusion in this patient population as suggested by lower postoperative lactate levels.

Blood perfusion status is important in the prognosis of ventricular aneurysm complicated by ventricular septal rupture.

Due to its low incidence, poor prognosis, and high mortality in the acute phase, the long-term prognosis of the left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) complicated by ventricular septal rupture (VSR) has received little attention. This study focus on the long-term prognosis of patients with LVA complicated by relatively stable VSR. Over a decade of retrospection, 68 patients with both LVA and VSR were compared with 136 patients with LVA alone after propensity score matching. Patients with both LVA and VSR were further divided into two groups depending on whether pre-operative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was used (23 pre-operative IABP vs. 45 non-pre-operative IABP). The primary endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, a composite endpoint including mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke, and heart failure. Patients with both LVA and VSR were generally in a worse condition upon admission compared with those with LVA alone [percentage of patients in New York Heart Association IV: 42.6% (29/68) vs. 11.0% (15/136), P<0.001]. Both pre-operative and post-operative IABP use rates were significantly higher in patients with both LVA and VSR than in patients with LVA alone [pre-operative IABP use rates: 33.8% (23/68) vs. 0.74% (1/136), P<0.001 and post-operative IABP use rates: 33.8% (23/68) vs. 10.3% (14/136), P<0.001]. No significant difference was observed in the primary endpoint between patients with both LVA and VSR and those with LVA alone (log-rank test, P=0.63, median follow-up time 63months). We further investigated the effect of pre-operative IABP on the long-term prognosis of patients with both LVA and VSR. Patients who applied pre-operative IABP had a worse long-term prognosis than those who did not (log-rank test, P=0.0011). The long-term prognosis of LVA combined with VSR was not inferior than LVA alone after surgery, but poor blood perfusion status was associated with a worse prognosis.

Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices (tMCS) are increasingly being used in patients with infarct-associated cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Evidence on patient selection, complications and long-term outcomes is lacking. We aim to investigate differences in clinical characteristics, complications and outcomes between patients receiving no tMCS or either intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) or Impella® for AMICS, with a particular focus on long-term outcomes. Using health claim data from AOK-Die Gesundheitskasse (local health care funds), we retrospectively analysed complications and outcomes of all insured patients with AMICS between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017. A total of 39,864 patients were included (IABP 5451; Impella 776; V-A ECMO 833; no tMCS 32,804). In-hospital complications, including renal failure requiring dialysis (50.3% V-A ECMO vs. 30.5% Impella vs. 29.2 IABP vs. 12.1% no tMCS), major bleeding (38.1% vs. 20.9% vs. 18.0% vs. 9.3%) and sepsis (22.5% vs. 15.9% vs. 13.9% vs. 9.3%) were more common in V-A ECMO patients. In a multivariate analysis, the use of both V-A ECMO (HR 1.57, p < 0.001) and Impella (HR 1.25, p < 0.001) were independently associated with long-term mortality, whereas use of IABP was not (HR 0.89, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed better survival for patients on IABP compared with Impella, V-A ECMO and no-tMCS. Short- and long-term mortality was high across all groups. Our data show noticeably more in-hospital complications in patients on tMCS and higher mortality with V-A ECMO and Impella. The use of both devices is an independent risk factor for mortality, whereas the use of IABP is associated with a survival benefit.

The use of intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiac surgery

Background: Objective of the study was to determine the incidence of use, indications, complications of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and its impact on outcome. Methods: Retrospective study of adult cardiac surgical patients presenting for cardiac surgery at Queen Alia Heart Institute in the period of time between September 2023 and February 2024. Patients’ demographic, clinical, perioperative data were recorded and analysed. Time of initiation of intra-aortic balloon, indications and monitoring for complications were observed by the authors. Patients were divided into two groups according to the use of IABP; the IABP group and the non-IABP group. Both groups were compared regarding outcome. Ethical committee approval obtained. Results: Data from 202 adult cardiac surgeries was analysed. Average age of patients was 57.2 years. Patients were 34 females (16.8%) and 168 males (83.2%). Most surgeries were elective (93.6%), while urgent surgeries comprised 3.5% and emergency surgeries were 3%. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was the most common procedure (78.2%). The IABP was most commonly used after combined procedures (50%) and to a lesser extent after isolated CABG (15.3%). IABP was inserted least frequently pre-operatively (10.7%), followed by postoperative insertion (35.7%), while intraoperative insertion to aid weaning from CPB was most common (53.6%). Patients from the IABP group were older, had longer CPB time (136.7 minutes) and AXC times (70.5 minutes), they also spent around 2 days more in the ICU and around 4 days more in hospital. Conclusions: IABP was most commonly utilised for combined procedures, after prolonged CPB and aortic cross clamping. The use of IABP was associated with delayed tracheal extubation, longer ICU stay, longer hospitalisation, and higher rates of blood transfusion, higher incidence of re-opening and higher mortality.

The use of mechanical circulatory support in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: a literature-based review.

Contemporary medical practices allow complete percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a considerable number of patients who previously would have been considered too 'high-risk' for such procedures. The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices during these high-risk PCIs (HR-PCIs) is thought to reduce the potential risk for major adverse events during and after revascularization. The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO), and the Impella are the most common MCS devices in use. This review aims to summarize the clinical evidence for each of these devices and the potential mechanisms for the improvement in patient outcomes in HR-PCI. The IABP use has rapidly declined in recent years due to no evidence of benefit in HR-PCI and cardiogenic shock. The V-A ECMO results in low rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) but higher rates of acute kidney injury and increased need for transfusions. In initial studies, Impella resulted in a reduced need for repeat interventions and reduced rates of hypotension, but no benefit in mortality. However, MACCE rates with Impella have gradually declined over the last 10 years, reflecting increased operator experience and technical improvements. Thus, a large, randomized trial is needed to assess the efficacy of Impella in HR-PCI with contemporary standards of care. There is currently no individual parameter that can identify patients who would benefit from MCS use in elective HR-PCI. To address this gap, we propose an algorithm that combines anatomical complexity, comorbidities, and clinical presentation to accurately identify candidates for MCS-assisted HR-PCI.

Intra-aortic balloon pump still has a role in late-onset myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular septal rupture with intractable heart failure: a case report

BackgroundThe current guidelines have discouraged the routine use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Since then, the trend of IABP utilization in ACS has been declining. Nevertheless, the guidelines still preserve the recommendation of IABP use in hemodynamic instability or cardiogenic shock caused by post myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal rupture (VSR).Case presentationA 46-years-old diabetic Southeast Asian female was referred from a peripheral facility with intractable heart failure despite treatment with vasoactive agents and diuretics for five days. The ECG suggested a recent anteroseptal myocardial infarction with normal high-sensitivity troponin-I value. The echocardiography detected a regional wall motion abnormality and a 10 mm wide ventricular septal defect. Invasive coronary angiography revealed a severe two-vessel coronary artery disease. We planned a delayed surgical strategy with preoperative optimization using IABP as a bridge to surgery. IABP implantation followed by significant hemodynamic improvement and rapid resolution of heart failure without any inotrope support. Afterwards, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and VSR surgical repair were performed. We safely removed IABP on the third postoperative day with proper weaning and minimal vasoactive support.ConclusionWe report a case where IABP still provided benefits for a patient with intractable heart failure caused by undetermined onset MI complicated by VSR. The use of IABP in such a case is in accordance with the recommendation of the current guidelines. Several studies showed that IABP use during preoperative optimization in the case of post-MI VSR was associated with survival benefits.

Five-year Trends In Outcomes Of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use In Non-ischemic Cardiogenic Shock

Five-year Trends In Outcomes Of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use In Non-ischemic Cardiogenic Shock

Risk Factors and Short-Term Outcomes of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Elderly Patients After Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

The risk factors of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) have been extensively investigated in non-cardiac surgery and non-elderly adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, data on elderly patients after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and short-term outcomes for PPCs in elderly patients undergoing CPB procedures. Data from 660 patients who underwent CPB over a six-year period at a tertiary care hospital were collected. The primary outcome encompassed the incidence of PPCs, including re-intubation, postoperative mechanical ventilation exceeding 48 hours, pulmonary infection, pleural effusion requiring thoracic drainage, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Missing data were managed using multiple imputation. Univariate analysis and the multiple logistic regression method were utilized to ascertain independent risk factors for PPCs. Among the 660 patients, PPCs were observed in 375 individuals (56.82%). Multiple logistic regression identified serum albumin levels <40 g/L, type of surgery, CPB duration >150 minutes, blood transfusion, and intra-aortic balloon pump use before extubation as independent risk factors for PPCs. Patients experiencing PPCs had prolonged mechanical ventilation, extended hospitalization and ICU stays, elevated postoperative mortality, and higher tracheotomy rates compared to those without PPCs. Elderly patients following CPB displayed a substantially high incidence of PPCs, significantly impacting their prognosis. Additionally, this study identified five prominent risk factors associated with PPCs in this population. These findings enable clinicians to better recognize patients who may benefit from perioperative prevention strategies based on these risk factors.

Intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest caused by acute coronary syndrome

BackgroundThis study evaluated the association between intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) caused by acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and 30-day outcomes. MethodsThis study was a secondary analysis of data from the SAVE-J II study, a retrospective, multicenter registry study involving 36 participating institutions in Japan. Patients with cardiac arrest caused by ACS who received ECPR were divided into two groups depending on whether or not they received IABP. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Subgroup analysis was performed to detect what type of patients were mostly associated with improved outcomes. ResultsOf 2,157 patients registered in the SAVE-J II study, 877 patients were enrolled in this study, 702 patients in the IABP group and 175 patients in the non-IABP group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis did not reveal a significant difference in 30-day survival (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.91–2.07, p = 0.13). In the subgroup analysis, 30-day survival among patients without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stenosis of multiple coronary vessels were associated with IABP use. ConclusionsIABP use in patients with OHCA with ACS who received ECPR is not associated with 30-day survival. The use of IABP in patients who did not have PCI and have multiple coronary vessel stenoses warrants further study.

Female Gender in Cardiac Surgery: Is it Still a Significant Risk? A Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia.

Female sex is considered an independent predictor for mortality and morbidity following cardiac surgery. This study is to review the outcomes of adult cardiac surgery between males and females in a Saudi tertiary referral hospital. This was a retrospective study for 925 adult patients operated on for ischemic coronary artery disease and acquired aortic and mitral valvular heart disease from 2015 to August 2023. We analyzed patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative results to compare outcomes between males and females. Preoperative risk factors were not significantly different in both groups. Postoperative outcomes showed gender-based differences. In univariable analysis, females, compared to males, had significantly greater odds of prolonged postoperative ventilation (>24 hours), 32.8% of females compared to 20.7% of males (p < 0.001). Also, sternal wound infection was notably higher among females (13.3%) (p < 0.001). Mortality also exhibited a significant association, with 14.2% of females experiencing mortality compared to 9.4% of males (p = 0.049). In the multivariable analysis for elevated postoperative troponin, the use of pre-operative intra-aortic balloon pump, urgent/emergent surgery, elevated pre-operative troponin and combined bypass grafting with valve surgery, were also predictive of higher post-operative troponin concentrations (beta = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.62, p < 0.001). Females in Saudi Arabia have an increased risk of short-term morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery compared to males. Vague and delayed presentation and then the late diagnosis and referral are likely the main contributing factors. This highlights the need to implement preoperative measures to improve early diagnosis and referral to eliminate gender bias.

Association of cardiopulmonary bypass with acute kidney injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective cohort study.

Association of cardiopulmonary bypass with acute kidney injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective cohort study.

Changing Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a Nationwide Registry inJapan.

Temporal trends in the management of acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock after the revision of guideline recommendations for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use and the approval of the Impella require further investigation, because their impact remains uncertain. Using the Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (J-PCI) registry database from 2019 to 2021, we identified 12 171 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock under mechanical circulatory support. The patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) IABP alone, (2) Impella, and (3) venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO); the VA-ECMO group was further stratified into (3a) VA-ECMO alone, (3b) VA-ECMO in combination with IABP, and (3c) VA-ECMO in combination with Impella. The quarterly prevalence and outcomes were reported. The use of IABP alone decreased significantly from 63.5% in the first quarter of 2019 to 58.3% in the fourth quarter of 2021 (P for trend=0.01). Among 4245 patients requiring VA-ECMO, the use of VA-ECMO in combination with IABP decreased significantly from 78.7% to 67.3%, whereas the use of VA-ECMO in combination with Impella increased significantly from 4.2% to 17.0% (P for trend <0.001 for both). After adjusting for the confounders, the risk difference in the fourth quarter of 2021 relative to the first quarter of 2019 for in-hospital mortality was not significant (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69-1.01]). Our study revealed substantial changes in the use of different mechanical circulatory support modalities in acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock, but they did not significantly improve the outcomes.

Mortality risk factors in patients receiving ECPR after cardiac arrest: Development and validation of a clinical prognostic prediction model

BackgroundPrevious studies have shown an increasing trend of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) use in patients with cardiac arrest (CA). Although ECPR have been found to reduce mortality in patients with CA compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), the mortality remains high. This study was designed to identify the potential mortality risk factors for ECPR patients for further optimization of patient management and treatment selection. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multicentre study collecting 990 CA patients undergoing ECPR in 61 hospitals in China from January 2017 to May 2022 in CSECLS registry database. A clinical prediction model was developed using cox regression and validated with external data. ResultsThe data of 351 patients meeting the inclusion criteria before October 2021 was used to develop a prediction model and that of 68 patients after October 2021 for validation. Of the 351 patients with CA treated with ECPR, 227 (64.8%) patients died before hospital discharge. Multivariate analysis suggested that a medical history of cerebrovascular diseases, pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystole and higher Lactate (Lac) were risk factors for mortality while aged 45–60, higher pH and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) during ECPR have protective effects. Internal validation by bootstrap resampling was subsequently used to evaluate the stability of the model, showing moderate discrimination, especially in the early stage following ECPR, with a C statistic of 0.70 and adequate calibration with GOF chi-square = 10.4 (p = 0.50) for the entire cohort. Fair discrimination with c statistic of 0.65 and good calibration (GOF chi-square = 6.1, p = 0.809) in the external validation cohort demonstrating the model's ability to predict in-hospital death across a wide range of probabilities. ConclusionRisk factors have been identified among ECPR patients including a history of cerebrovascular diseases, higher Lac and presence of PEA or asystole. While factor such as age 45–60, higher pH and use of IABP have been found protective against in-hospital mortality. These factors can be used for risk prediction, thereby improving the management and treatment selection of patients for this resource-intensive therapy.