Use Of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Research Articles

Incidence and outcomes of prosthetic valve thrombosis during peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

In the context of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) following valve replacement surgery, it may be necessary to implant a peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO). This procedure, however, carries a risk of prosthetic valve thrombosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the incidence and outcomes of prosthetic valve thrombosis after VA-ECMO support for PCCS and to report the associated risk factors. All consecutive adult patients who received pVA-ECMO for PCCS following a valve replacement procedure between January 2015 and October 2019 in our institution were included in this retrospective study. Outcome variables were prosthetic valve thrombosis, 30-day and hospital survival, pVA-ECMO-associated adverse events and surgery-related adverse events. During the 4-year study period, 549 patients received pVA-ECMO for PCCS. Among them, 152 had undergone a valve replacement procedure and 9 of these developed prosthetic valve thrombosis. The incidence of valve thrombosis at 30 days was 7.5 ± 2%. The cumulative Incidence of prosthetic valve thrombosis was significantly lower with pVA-ECMO + IABP versus VA-ECMO alone (1.4 ± 1.4% vs 13.7 ± 4.7%, p = 0.021, respectively). Intra-aortic balloon pump use associated with pVA-ECMO (versus pVA-ECMO alone) was an independent protective factor against hospital death (OR = 0.180 [0.068-0.478], p = 0.001). After PCCS following valve replacement surgery, peripheral femoro-femoral VA-ECMO is associated with a low risk of acute valve thrombosis especially when associated with an IABP.

Preoperative Malnutrition Calculated Using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background: The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), which assesses nutritional status using the ideal body weight ratio and albumin level, is a useful predictor of long-term cardiovascular disease prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative GNRI on off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgical outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 632 elective OPCAB procedures performed between July 2008 and July 2018. GNRI was calculated as 14.89 × albumin level (g/dL) + 41.7 × (current body weight [kg]/ideal body weight [kg]). Patients were divided into two groups: the low GNRI (≤98, L group, n = 155) and high GNRI (>98, H group, n = 477) groups. We compared perioperative variables and mid-term outcomes, particularly survival rates and freedom from major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Results: Patients in the L group were older (72.4 ± 8.6 vs. 67.9 ± 10.1 years, p < 0.001) and had lower GNRI scores (90.9 ± 5.8 vs. 106.0 ± 4.8, p < 0.001) than patients in the H group. Perioperative results, including operation time and number of anastomoses, were similar between the groups, with no significant differences in 30-day mortality, perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump use, bleeding, stroke, or mediastinitis rates were observed. However, patients in the L group had a longer postoperative hospital stay than those in the H group (15.4 ± 13.5 vs. 12.6 ± 5.8 days, p = 0.01). Analyses of long-term outcomes revealed a significant difference in 5-year survival rates (70.9% for the L group vs. 83.3% for the H group, p = 0.002) but no significant difference in 5-year MACCE rates (84.1% for the L group vs. 80.3% for the H group, p = 0.19). Conclusions: Despite the longer hospital stay for patients in the L group, other perioperative outcomes were similar between the groups, suggesting that a low GNRI should not preclude patients from undergoing OPCAB surgery.

Ten-year trends in characteristics, management and outcomes of patients admitted with cardiogenic shock in the ACTION-SHOCK cohort

BackgroundThe ACTION-SHOCK registry offers a decade-long perspective on patients admitted with cardiogenic shock (CS). AimsTo assess trends in the management and outcomes of patients with CS over 10 years. MethodsTrends in the characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with CS admitted into the cardiac intensive care unit of Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital from 2011 to 2020 were analysed. Short-term outcomes included in-hospital mortality, heart transplantation or ventricular assist device. Long-term outcomes were all-cause death or readmission for acute heart failure at 1 year. ResultsOver a 10-year period, data from 700 patients with CS (median [interquartile range] age 61 [50–72] years; 73% of men) were analysed. The proportion of CS related to acute myocardial infarction decreased (from 45% in 2011–2012 to 27% in 2019–2020) while the proportions related to chronic coronary syndrome (18% to 23%) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies (37 to 51%) increased (P<0.01). The use of rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remained stable (19 to 14%) and intra-aortic balloon pump use decreased (22% to 7%) (P<0.01). In-hospital mortality remained stable (27 to 29%) as did the proportions of patients discharged after transplantation (17 to 14%) or with a durable ventricular assist device (2 to 4%). Among patients discharged alive, death or readmission for acute heart failure at 1 year remained high (37 to 47%). ConclusionCS remained associated with a poor prognosis over the last decade. There are significant unmet needs in the management strategies of patients with CS.

A propensity-matched analysis of cardiac operation in patients with and without cardiac amyloidosis

ObjectiveThere are limited data on the outcome of routine cardiac operations in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. This study studied the impact of amyloidosis on early and late results of cardiac operations. MethodsThis was a retrospective, propensity-matched, case-control study of patients with cardiac amyloidosis undergoing cardiac surgery. Heart transplantation and ventricular assist implantation were excluded. Controls were patients without known cardiac amyloidosis matched on baseline patient characteristics, echocardiographic findings, and type of operation. Outcomes included operative complications and survival. ResultsIn total, 42 patients with cardiac amyloidosis (amyloid group [AG]) were matched with 168 controls (CON group). The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 63% in the AG group (vs 64% CON). Aortic valve replacement and septal myectomy were the most common operations. Cardiopulmonary bypass (P = .374) and crossclamp (P = .185) times were similar in the 2 groups. Complication rates were similar in the 2 groups, including the need for mechanical circulatory support (n = 1 AG group vs n = 1 CON; P = .361) and intra-aortic balloon pump use (n = 3 AG group vs n = 13 CON; P = 1.000). There were no operative deaths. Survival was similar in the 2 groups at 1 year (AG 93% vs 89% CON; P = .1) but was worse in the AG at 5 years (59% vs 68% CON; P = .1). ConclusionsEarly procedural outcomes and 1-year survival are similar in patients with and without cardiac amyloidosis with preserved cardiac function. Diagnosis of amyloidosis should not be a contraindication to cardiac surgery.

Relationships between sex and in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute cardiogenic shock receiving mechanical circulatory support

BackgroundCardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in women. Despite this there is a paucity of data on the impact of sex on utilization and outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in patients hospitalized with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Cardiogenic Shock (CS). MethodsWe examined the 2016–2019 National Inpatient Sample database to identify cases of AMI-CS. Men were used as our control group, while women comprised our cohort. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the use of tMCS including; left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use, Impella use, and Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) use, length of stay (LOS) and total hospitalization cost (THC). Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders. ResultsAmong patients hospitalized for AMI (N = 2,622,939), 37.7 % were Female. A Female sex was associated with a higher inpatient mortality (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.06, p < 0.001), a lower likelihood of LVAD use (2.3 % vs. 2.9 % and p < 0.001), IABP use (3.0 % vs. 4.4 % and p < 0.001), Impella use (1.0 % vs. 1.5 % and p < 0.001), a longer mean LOS (4.4 vs 4.3 days and p < 0.001) and lower THC ($88,097 vs. $104,101, p < 0.001) compared to male patients for AMI-CS. ConclusionFemale patients admitted for AMI-CS were less likely to receive tMCS despite a higher mortality rate and a slightly longer LOS compared to male patients. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings and elucidate clearer causality for such disparities.

Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing urgent cardiac bypass surgery.

In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), either with or without cardiogenic shock, mechanical circulatory support with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is not associated with lower mortality. However, in STEMI patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), preoperative insertion of an IABP has been suggested to reduce mortality. In this study, the effect of preoperative IABP use on mortality in STEMI patients undergoing urgent CABG was investigated. All consecutive STEMI patients undergoing urgent CABG in asingle centre between 2000 and 2018 were studied. The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, was compared between patients with and without apreoperative IABP. Subgroup analysis and multivariable analysis using apropensity score and inverse probability treatment weighting were performed to adjust for potential confounders. Atotal of 246 patients were included, of whom 171 (69.5%) received apreoperative IABP (pIABP group) and 75 (30.5%) did not (non-pIABP group). In the pIABP group, more patients suffered from cardiogenic shock, persistent ischaemia and reduced left ventricular function. Unadjusted 30-day mortality was comparable between the pIABP and the non-pIABP group (13.3% vs 12.3%, p = 0.82). However, after correction for confounders and inverse probability treatment weighting preoperative IABP was associated with reduced 30-day mortality (relative risk 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.88). In patients with STEMI undergoing urgent CABG, preoperative insertion of an IABP is associated with reduced mortality.

Risk of Transfusion in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Models Developed From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database

BackgroundPerioperative blood transfusion is associated with adverse outcomes and higher costs after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We developed risk assessments for patients’ probability of perioperative transfusion and the expected transfusion volume to improve clinical management and resource use. MethodsAmong 1,266,545 consecutive (2008-2016) isolated CABG operations in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, 657,821 (51.9%) received perioperative transfusions of red blood cells (RBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate, and/or platelets. We developed “full” models to predict perioperative transfusion of any blood product, and of RBC, FFP, or platelets. Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model selection, we built a rapid risk score based on 5 variables (age, body surface area, sex, preoperative hematocrit, and use of intra-aortic balloon pump). ResultsC statistics for the full model were 0.785, 0.815, 0.707, and 0.699 for any blood product, RBC, FFP, and platelets, respectively. C statistics for rapid risk assessments were 0.752, 0.785, 0.670, and 0.661 for any blood product, RBC, FFP, and platelets, respectively. The observed vs expected risk plots showed strong calibration for full models and risk assessment tools; absolute differences between observed and expected risks of transfusion were <10.8% in each percentile of expected risk. Risk assessment–predicted probabilities of transfusion were strongly and nonlinearly associated (P < .0001) with total units transfused. ConclusionsThese robust and well-calibrated risk assessment tools for perioperative transfusion in CABG can inform surgeons regarding patients’ risks and the number of RBC, FFP, and platelets units they can expect to need. This can aid in optimizing outcomes and increasing efficient use of blood products.

Impact of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump on outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left-main coronary artery disease.

Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) could improve operative outcomes by augmenting the diastolic coronary blood flow. Data on preoperative IABP use in patients with left-main coronary artery (LMCA) disease are limited. This study aimed to characterize patients who received preoperative IABP before CABG for LMCA and evaluate its effect on postoperative outcomes. This multicenter retrospective cohort study that included consecutive 914 patients who underwent CABG for unprotected LMCA disease from January 2015 to December 2019 in 14 tertiary referral centers. Patients were grouped according to the preoperative IABP insertion into patients with IABP (n=101) and without IABP (n=813). Propensity score matching adjusting for preoperative variables, with 1:1 match and a caliber of 0.03 identified 80 matched pairs. The primary outcomes used in propensity score matching were cardiac mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). IABP was commonly inserted in patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI), chronic kidney disease, peripheral arterial disease, and congestive heart failure. IABP patients had higher EuroSCORE [ES >8%: 95 (11.86%) vs. 40 (39.60%), P<0.001] and SYNTAX {29 [interquartile range (IQR) 25-35] vs. 33 (IQR 26-36); P=0.02} scores. Preoperative cardiogenic shock and arrhythmia were more prevalent in patients with IABP, while acute coronary syndrome was more prevalent in patients without IABP. After matching, there was no difference in vasoactive inotropic score between groups [3.5 (IQR 1-7.5) vs. 6 (IQR 1-13.5), P=0.06], and lactate levels were nonsignificantly higher in patients with IABP [2.4 (IQR 1.4-4.5) vs. 3.1 (IQR 1.05-7.75), P=0.05]. There were no differences between groups in acute kidney injury [20 (25%) vs. 26 (32.5%), P=0.34], cerebrovascular accidents [3 (3.75%) vs. 4 (5%), P>0.99], heart failure [5 (6.25%) vs. 7 (8.75%), P=0.75], MI [7 (8.75%) vs. 8 (10%), P>0.99], major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [10 (12.5%) vs. 17 (21.25%), P=0.21], and cardiac mortality [6 (7.50%) vs. 14 (17.50%), P=0.09]. Patients who received IABP had longer ventilation times [8.5 (IQR 6-23) vs. 15.5 (IQR 5-50.5) h, P=0.03] and intensive care unit (ICU) stays [3 (IQR 2-5) vs. 4 (IQR 2-7.5) days, P=0.01]. Preoperative IABP in patients with LMCA might not be associated with reduced cardiac mortality or hospital complications. IABP could increase the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, and its use should be individualized for each patient.

Volume-Outcome Relationships for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major scenario for the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), particularly when complicated by cardiogenic shock, although the utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices varies widely per hospital. We evaluated the relationship, at the hospital level, between the volume of IABP use and mortality in AMI. Using a Japanese nationwide administrative database, 26,490 patients with AMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 154 hospitals were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio. Predicted mortality per patient was calculated using baseline variables and averaged for each hospital. The associations among PCI volume for AMI, observed and predicted in-hospital mortality, and observed and predicted IABP use were assessed per hospital. Of 26,490 patients, 2,959 (11.2%) were treated with IABP and 1,283 (4.8%) died during hospitalization. The annualized number of uses of IABP per hospital in AMI was 4.5. In lower-volume primary PCI centers, IABP was more likely to be underused than expected, and the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio was higher than in higher-volume centers. A lower annual number of IABP use was associated with an increased mortality risk at the hospital level, suggesting that IABP use can be an institutional quality indicator in the setting of AMI.

Is preoperative IABP insertion significantly reducing postoperative complication in augmented high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting patients?

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine whether pre-operative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion improves surgical outcomes in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients.MethodsPatients with a EuroSCORE II greater than 1.2% who underwent CABG from 2009 to 2016 were included in the study, while those who utilized intra-operative or post-operative IABP were excluded. The analysis included a total of 2907 patients, with 377 patients undergoing preoperative IABP insertion (EuroSCORE II > 5.018%) and 1198 patients in the non-IABP group before matching; after propensity score matching (PSM), both groups consisted of a matched cohort of 250 patients.Results30-day mortality events occurred in 9 (3.6%) non-IABP group and in 12 (4.8%) IABP patients (OR: 1.33 95%CI: 0.52–3.58). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups in mortality up to one year after the operation (p = 0.72). On multivariate analysis, IABP usage among the PSM patients was associated with lower 30-day mortality (OR: 0.28, 95%CI: 0.07–0.92, P-value = 0.043), 90-day mortality (OR: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.08–0.78, P-value = 0.022) and reduced risk of developing severe respiratory disorders (OR: 0.10, 95%CI:0.01–0.50, P-value = 0.011).ConclusionPre-operative IABP use in high-risk patients reduces 30- and 90-day mortality rates, along with a notable decrease in rates of severe respiratory disorders.

An explainable machine learning approach using contemporary UNOS data to identify patients who fail to bridge to heart transplantation.

The use of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) and Impella devices as a bridge to heart transplantation (HTx) has increased significantly in recent times. This study aimed to create and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model that can predict the failure of status two listings and identify the clinical features that significantly impact this outcome. We used the UNOS registry database to identify HTx candidates listed as UNOS Status 2 between 2018 and 2022 and supported with either Impella (5.0 or 5.5) or IABP. We used the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to build and validate ML models. We developed two models: (1) a comprehensive model that included all patients in our cohort and (2) separate models designed for each of the 11 UNOS regions. We analyzed data from 4,178 patients listed as Status 2. Out of them, 12% had primary outcomes indicating Status 2 failure. Our ML models were based on 19 variables from the UNOS data. The comprehensive model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 (±0.03), with a range between 0.44 (±0.08) and 0.74 (±0.01) across different regions. The models' specificity ranged from 0.75 to 0.96. The top five most important predictors were the number of inotropes, creatinine, sodium, BMI, and blood group. Using ML is clinically valuable for highlighting patients at risk, enabling healthcare providers to offer intensified monitoring, optimization, and care escalation selectively.

Is there a role for intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with cardiogenic shock? predictors of success

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Hospital Clínico San Carlos Madrid. Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a clinical challenge associated with unacceptable high mortality rates. Early revascularization is the cornerstone for CS management. However, CS patients usually requires further advanced therapies such as vasopressors and mechanical circulatory support devices. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is not routinely used in patients with CS according to the current recommendations. However, this device could be associated with potential benefit in selected patients and we believe it is underutilized. Our aim was to assess for potential predictors of success after IABP implantation in patients with CS. Methods From 2013 to 2023, 136 consecutive patients diagnosed with CS and admitted to an Acute Cardiac Care Unit in a tertiary care hospital were recruited. Demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were retrospectively collected. SCAI classification was used to define shock state. Patient were followed-up to November-2023 and clinical events were also recorded. For purposes of analysis, patients were classified in two groups: IABP success (N=70) and IABP failure (N=66). Success, in terms of IABP use, was defined as patient’s survival to the index event. Failure of IABP was defined as in-hospital death. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential predictors of success. Results Mean age was 67.2±12.2 years and 64.7% were females. There were no significant differences in cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities between groups: hypertension (56.6% vs 43.5%, p 0.132), diabetes (40.9% vs 59.1%, p 0.088), chronic kidney disease (50% vs 50%, p 0.800), previous stroke (53.9% vs 41.2%, p 0.857) in "Success-group" vs "Failure-group" respectively. STEMI was the most frequent cause of CS requiring an IABP (65.9%). Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction was more common in the "Success-group", whereas cardiac arrest was more common in the "Failure-group" (Table 1). Regarding the CS classification, patients with IABP failure were more frequently in SCAI D and E categories (Table 1). In addition, patients in the failure-group had worse hemodynamic and analytic parameters (Table 1) and the IABP failed to significantly improve them. There were no significant differences in coronary artery disease burden and treatment. Complete revascularization was accomplished in a similar proportion of patients in both groups (Table 1). The multivariate analysis showed that SCAI B&amp;C states were independently associated with success after IABP implantation, whereas lactate level prior to IABP implantation was associated with failure (Table 2). Conclusion Selecting the appropriate timing for IABP implantation is critical for the prognosis, as success rates are higher in less advanced stages of cardiogenic shock. Preimplantation lactate levels are also associated with success rates.

Outcomes of Patients Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Surgical Revascularization

Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is a leading cause of emergency hospitalisation across Europe. This study evaluates the in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) following NSTEMI. A retrospective analysis of all cases undergoing isolated CABG following NSTEMI from September/2017 to September/2022 at our Centre. Patients were stratified according to in-hospital survival. Patient characteristics, operative details, and procedural complications were compared between those who survived and those who did not. Predictors of in-hospital and mid-term mortality were evaluated using logistic and Cox regression modelling. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to generate a survival curve for all alive patients at the time of discharge. Among 1011 patients (median age 64 [56 - 72] years, 852 [84.3%] male), 735 (72.7%) underwent urgent, 239 (23.6%) elective, and 37 (3.7%) emergency CABG. The in-hospital mortality was 1.5% (15/1011 patients). Those who died were more likely to be NYHA class III/IV, have LVEF <21%, severe renal impairment, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), or poor mobility. Emergency procedures, pre-operative ventilation, inotropic support, and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use were also more prevalent among those who died. Logistic regression modelling revealed new postoperative stroke (OR:22.0; 95% CI:3.6-135.5; p=0.001), pre-operative IABP use (11.4; 2.4-53.7; p=0.002), new haemodialysis (9.6; 2.7-34.7; p<0.001), PVD (5.6; 1.6-20.0; p=0.008), and poor mobility (OR: 4.8; 95% CI: 1.3-18.2; p=0.022) as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, new postoperative stroke, pre-operative IABP use, new haemodialysis, PVD and poor mobility are independent predictors of mortality in NSTEMI patients undergoing isolated CABG.

B-55 | Trends and Outcomes of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Patients with Concomitant Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A 5-Year Cohort Study

B-55 | Trends and Outcomes of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Patients with Concomitant Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A 5-Year Cohort Study

EFFECT OF PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETERIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONISCHEMIC CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: A NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS.

Background: Pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) has been widely used in critically ill patients, yielding mixed results. Prior studies on cardiogenic shock (CS) predominantly included patients with acute myocardial infarction. This study aims to examine the effect of PAC use in patients with nonischemic CS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study employed data from the National Inpatient Sample database, including weighted hospitalizations of adult patients with nonischemic CS during 2017 to 2019. In-hospital outcomes were compared between groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: A total of 303,970 patients with nonischemic CS were included, of whom 17.5% received a PAC during their hospitalization. The median age was 67 years (interquartile range: 57-77) and 61% were male. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, patients in the PAC group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (24.8% vs. 35.3%, P < 0.001), renal replacement therapy (10.7% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.002), in-hospital cardiac arrest (7.1% vs. 9.6%, P < 0.001), and mechanical ventilation (44.6% vs. 50.4%, P < 0.001) compared to non-PAC group. In contrast, the PAC group had higher use of intra-aortic balloon pump (15.4% vs. 3.4%, P < 0.001), percutaneous ventricular assist devices (12.6% vs. 2.6%, P < 0.001), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3.9% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.001), and heart transplantation (2.1% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: In the real-world setting, invasive hemodynamic monitoring with PAC in patients with nonischemic CS is associated with survival benefits and a reduction in adverse events, including reduced need for renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation and risk of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Impact of duration of cardiopulmonary bypass on recovery after open heart surgery

Background: Objective of the study was to examine the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration on recovery from cardiac surgery. Methods: This is an observational retrospective study. Data from adult cardiac surgical patients presented at Queen Alia Heart Institute (QAHI) in the duration between September 2023 and February 2024 was retrospectively analysed. The impact of CPB duration was examined. Patients were divided into groups according to CPB duration (0 to 60 minutes, 60 to 120 minutes, 120 to 180 minutes, 180 to 240 minutes and 240 to 300 minutes). For each group intra-operative and post-operative variable were examined. The intra-operative variables studied were need for blood transfusion, haemofiltration and intra-aortic balloon pump. The post-operative variables studied were duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospitalization time and mortality. Results: Consecutive data of 202 adult cardiac surgical patients (34 females and 168 males) was analysed. Average age of patients was 57.149 years. Average duration of CPB was 109.9 minutes (ranged from 29 to 300 minutes). Half of the patients (50.5%) had CPB duration between 1 and 2 hours. Blood transfusion was needed in 88 patients (43.6%). Haemofiltration was used in 32 patients (15.8%) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was used in 29 patients (14.4%). The average postoperative time of mechanical ventilation was 34 hours and the average ICU stay was 5.5 days. Chest re-exploration was needed in 30 patients (15%). Hospital stay was on average 12 days and in-hospital mortality was witnessed in 20 patients (9.9%). Patients who had CPB for less than one hour (17.3%) had the lowest incidence of blood transfusion (37.1%), lowest incidence of haemofiltration (8.6%), low incidence of IABP use (11%). They also had lowest incidence of chest re-opening (5.7%), shortest time of postoperative mechanical ventilation (13 hours) and shortest ICU and hospital stay (4.1 and 8.5 days, respectively). There was a significant increase in postoperative sternal re-opening and postoperative mortality when the duration of CPB exceeded 3 hours. Conclusions: Duration of CPB is a key predictor of recovery and outcome of cardiac surgery. Shorter CPB time was associated with earlier extubation, less ICU stay and shorter hospitalisation time. Prolonged CPB was associated with higher rates of complications, delayed recovery, longer ICU stay, protracted hospitalisation and higher mortality rates.

Twelve-year trends in unprotected left main coronary artery occlusion: insights from a real-world multicentre study.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) resulting from unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) occlusion and subtotal occlusion is a life-threatening condition. Although AMI management has improved in the past two decades, there is limited information on recent trends in patient characteristics, management, and outcomes for acute unprotected LMCA-related AMI. This study aims to assess such trends over a 12year period. This retrospective multicentre study includes patients with unprotected LMCA occlusion/subtotal occlusion admitted to three tertiary hospitals between 2008 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups based on the chronology of presentation: a 'past group' (January 2008 to December 2014) and a 'contemporary group' (January 2015 to December 2020). The study compares clinical characteristics, management approaches, and outcomes between the two groups. The study includes 128 patients, with 51 (40%) in the 'past group' and 77 (60%) in the 'contemporary group'. Baseline risk factors did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups, except for hypertension (49% vs. 74%; P=0.005). Chest pain was more frequent in the 'past group' (98% vs. 89%; P=0.014), and a trend towards more cardiac arrests was observed in the 'contemporary group' (18% vs. 31%; P=0.087). Revascularization type did not differ significantly (P=0.419), but manual thrombectomy was less frequently used (41% vs. 23%; P=0.032) and stent implantation showed a trend towards higher rates (66% vs. 78%; P=0.150) in the 'contemporary cohort'. There was a gradual shift from bare-metal to drug-eluting stents, with a significantly higher percentage of ticagrelor/prasugrel loading in the 'contemporary cohort' (5% vs. 79%; P<0.001). The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), although not statistically significant, was higher among patients in the 'past group' (67% vs. 51%; P=0.073). The type of MCS differed significantly between groups, with a decrease in intra-aortic balloon pump use (67% vs. 42%; P=0.005) and an increase in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (4% vs. 22%; P=0.005) and Impella system (0% vs. 3%) over time. Survival analysis showed no significant differences (P=0.599; log-rank test) in all-cause mortality between the different time groups, with the long-term survival rate being approximately 30%. In our real-world population, despite the progressive use of newer drugs and more advanced devices over time, patients with unprotected LMCA occlusion/subtotal occlusion remain a subpopulation with poor prognosis.

Intraoperative Use of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump to Generate Pulsatile Flow During Heart Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.

The physiologic impact of pulsatile flow (PF) on end-organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is controversial. Using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) to maintain PF during CPB for patients undergoing heart transplantation (HT) may impact end-organ perfusion, with implications for postoperative outcomes. A single-center retrospective study of 76 patients bridged to HT with IABP was conducted between January 2018 and December 2022. Beginning in May 2022, patients received IABP-generated PF during CPB at an internal rate of 80 beats/minute. Fifty-eight patients underwent HT with the IABP turned off (IABP-Off), whereas 18 patients underwent HT with IABP-generated PF (IABP-On). The unmatched IABP-On group experienced shorter organ ischemia times (180 vs. 203 minutes, p = 0.015) and CPB times (104 vs. 116 minutes, p = 0.022). The cohort was propensity matched according to age, organ ischemia time, and CPB time. Elevations in postoperative lactates in the immediate (2.8 vs. 1.5, p = 0.062) and 24 hour (4.7 vs. 2.4, p = 0.084) postoperative periods trended toward significance in the matched IABP-Off group. There was no difference in postoperative vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), postoperative creatinine, or length of stay. This limited preliminary data suggest that maintaining counterpulsation to generate PF during CPB may improve end-organ perfusion in this patient population as suggested by lower postoperative lactate levels.

Blood perfusion status is important in the prognosis of ventricular aneurysm complicated by ventricular septal rupture.

Due to its low incidence, poor prognosis, and high mortality in the acute phase, the long-term prognosis of the left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) complicated by ventricular septal rupture (VSR) has received little attention. This study focus on the long-term prognosis of patients with LVA complicated by relatively stable VSR. Over a decade of retrospection, 68 patients with both LVA and VSR were compared with 136 patients with LVA alone after propensity score matching. Patients with both LVA and VSR were further divided into two groups depending on whether pre-operative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was used (23 pre-operative IABP vs. 45 non-pre-operative IABP). The primary endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, a composite endpoint including mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke, and heart failure. Patients with both LVA and VSR were generally in a worse condition upon admission compared with those with LVA alone [percentage of patients in New York Heart Association IV: 42.6% (29/68) vs. 11.0% (15/136), P<0.001]. Both pre-operative and post-operative IABP use rates were significantly higher in patients with both LVA and VSR than in patients with LVA alone [pre-operative IABP use rates: 33.8% (23/68) vs. 0.74% (1/136), P<0.001 and post-operative IABP use rates: 33.8% (23/68) vs. 10.3% (14/136), P<0.001]. No significant difference was observed in the primary endpoint between patients with both LVA and VSR and those with LVA alone (log-rank test, P=0.63, median follow-up time 63months). We further investigated the effect of pre-operative IABP on the long-term prognosis of patients with both LVA and VSR. Patients who applied pre-operative IABP had a worse long-term prognosis than those who did not (log-rank test, P=0.0011). The long-term prognosis of LVA combined with VSR was not inferior than LVA alone after surgery, but poor blood perfusion status was associated with a worse prognosis.

Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices (tMCS) are increasingly being used in patients with infarct-associated cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Evidence on patient selection, complications and long-term outcomes is lacking. We aim to investigate differences in clinical characteristics, complications and outcomes between patients receiving no tMCS or either intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) or Impella® for AMICS, with a particular focus on long-term outcomes. Using health claim data from AOK-Die Gesundheitskasse (local health care funds), we retrospectively analysed complications and outcomes of all insured patients with AMICS between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017. A total of 39,864 patients were included (IABP 5451; Impella 776; V-A ECMO 833; no tMCS 32,804). In-hospital complications, including renal failure requiring dialysis (50.3% V-A ECMO vs. 30.5% Impella vs. 29.2 IABP vs. 12.1% no tMCS), major bleeding (38.1% vs. 20.9% vs. 18.0% vs. 9.3%) and sepsis (22.5% vs. 15.9% vs. 13.9% vs. 9.3%) were more common in V-A ECMO patients. In a multivariate analysis, the use of both V-A ECMO (HR 1.57, p < 0.001) and Impella (HR 1.25, p < 0.001) were independently associated with long-term mortality, whereas use of IABP was not (HR 0.89, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed better survival for patients on IABP compared with Impella, V-A ECMO and no-tMCS. Short- and long-term mortality was high across all groups. Our data show noticeably more in-hospital complications in patients on tMCS and higher mortality with V-A ECMO and Impella. The use of both devices is an independent risk factor for mortality, whereas the use of IABP is associated with a survival benefit.