Intestinal Drug-drug Interactions Research Articles

Avapritinib Carries the Risk of Drug Interaction via Inhibition of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1.

Avapritinib is the only drug for adult patients with PDGFRA exon 18 mutated unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Although avapritinib has been approved by the FDA for four years, little is known about the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) via UDP-glucuronyltransferases (UGTs) inhibition. The aim of the present study was to systematically evaluate the inhibitory effects of avapritinib against UGTs and to quantitatively estimate its potential DDIs risk in vivo. Recombinant human UGTs were employed to catalyze the glucuronidation of substrates in a range of concentrations of avapritinib. The kinetics analysis was performed to evaluate the inhibition types of avapritinib against UGTs. The quantitative prediction of DDIs was done using in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). Avapritinib had a potent competitive inhibitory effect on UGT1A1. Quantitative prediction results showed that avapritinib administered at clinical doses might result in a 14.85% in-crease in area under the curve (AUC) of drugs primarily cleared by UGT1A1. Moreover, the Rgut value was calculated to be 18.44. Avapritinib has the potential to cause intestinal DDIs via the inhibition of UGT1A1. Additional attention should be paid when avapritinib is coadministered with UGT1A1 substrates.

The Necessity of Using Changes in Absorption Time to Implicate Intestinal Transporter Involvement in Oral Drug-Drug Interactions.

In drug discovery and development, it is of high interest to characterize the potential for intestinal drug-drug interactions to alter bioavailability of a victim drug. For drugs that are substrates of both intestinal transporters and enzymes, estimating the relative contribution of each process has proved challenging, especially since the susceptibility of drug to uptake or efflux transporters in vitro does not always translate to clinically significant in vivo involvement. Here we introduce a powerful methodology to implicate intestinal transporters in drug-drug interactions based on the theory that clinically relevant intestinal transporter interactions will result in altered rate of absorption of victim drugs. We present exemplary clinical drug-drug interaction studies that utilize well-characterized clinical substrates and perpetrators to demonstrate how mean absorption time (MAT) and time to maximum concentration (tmax) are expected to change (or remain unchanged) when either intestinal transporters or metabolic enzymes were/are altered. Apixaban was also selected to demonstrate the utility of the methodology, as the purported involvement of both intestinal enzymes and transporters has been suggested in its FDA package insert. Acute inhibition of gut efflux transporters resulted in decreased MAT and tmaxvalues, induction increased these values, while inhibition of intestinal metabolic enzymes did not result in altered MAT or tmax. Involvement of intestinal efflux transporters in apixaban disposition is unlikely. Utilization of this simple but powerful methodology to implicate intestinal transporter involvement will have significant impact on how drug-drug interactions are interpreted.

Four cation-selective transporters contribute to apical uptake and accumulation of metformin in Caco-2 cell monolayers.

Metformin is the frontline therapy for type II diabetes mellitus. The oral bioavailability of metformin is unexpectedly high, between 40 and 60%, given its hydrophilicity and positive charge at all physiologic pH values. Previous studies in Caco-2 cell monolayers, a cellular model of the human intestinal epithelium, showed that during absorptive transport metformin is taken up into the cells via transporters in the apical (AP) membrane; however, predominant transport to the basolateral (BL) side occurs via the paracellular route because intracellular metformin cannot egress across the BL membrane. Furthermore, these studies have suggested that the AP transporters can contribute to intestinal accumulation and absorption of metformin. Transporter-specific inhibitors as well as a novel approach involving a cocktail of transporter inhibitors with overlapping selectivity were used to identify the AP transporters that mediate metformin uptake in Caco-2 cell monolayers; furthermore, the relative contributions of these transporters in metformin AP uptake were also determined. The organic cation transporter 1, plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT), serotonin reuptake transporter, and choline high-affinity transporter contributed to approximately 25%, 20%, 20%, and 15%, respectively, of the AP uptake of metformin. PMAT-knockdown Caco-2 cells were constructed to confirm the contribution of PMAT in metformin AP uptake because a PMAT-selective inhibitor is not available. The identification of four intestinal transporters that contribute to AP uptake and potentially intestinal absorption of metformin is a significant novel finding that can influence our understanding of metformin pharmacology and intestinal drug-drug interactions involving this highly prescribed drug.

Intestinal Human Colon Adenocarcinoma Cell Line LS180 Is an Excellent Model to Study Pregnane X Receptor, but Not Constitutive Androstane Receptor, Mediated CYP3A4 and Multidrug Resistance Transporter 1 Induction: Studies with Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitors

Lack of an established cell line model to study induction of cytochromes P450 (P450s) and drug transporters poses a challenge in predicting in vivo drug-drug interactions. Although not well characterized, LS180 cells could be an excellent cell line to study induction of P450s and transporters because they express pregnane X receptor (PXR). Therefore, as part of a larger study of in vitro to in vivo prediction of inductive drug interactions, we determined induction of various P450s and drug transporters by the anti-human deficiency virus protease inhibitors (PIs) and the prototypic inducer, rifampin, in LS180 cells. Among these proteins, the various PIs significantly induced (n = 3-5) only CYP3A4 and multidrug resistance transporter 1 (MDR1) transcripts (2- to 50-fold). CYP3A4 activity (1'-hydroxymidazolam formation) was increased (2-fold) by rifampin (10 microM) but was reduced by the PIs (1.5- to 7-fold). Surprisingly, constitutive androstane receptor 1 (CAR1) was not found to be expressed in these cells. Additionally, using a reporter assay, we found that PIs did not activate CAR3 (the natural splice variant of CAR1) but significantly activated PXR (2- to 24-fold), which correlated well with induction of CYP3A4 and MDR1 transcripts (approximately r = 0.9). Furthermore, in a PXR-knockdown stable LS180 cell line, induction of CYP3A4 and MDR1 mRNA after treatment with PIs and rifampin was significantly reduced (1.4- to 5-fold) compared with that in PXR nonsilenced cells. Based on these data, we conclude that LS180 cells could be used as a readily available, high-throughput cell line to screen for PXR-mediated induction of CYP3A4 and MDR1 transcripts. These data also indicate that the majority of the PIs are likely to produce intestinal drug-drug interactions by inactivating or inhibiting CYP3A enzymes even though they induce CYP3A4 and MDR1 transcripts via PXR.