Healthcare Professional Interviews Research Articles

Future Fertility Among Pediatric Cancer Patients: Experiences and Perspectives of Health Workers in a Low-Resource Setting.

Purpose:Although fertility preservation for patients with childhood and adolescent cancer is considered standard of care in the high-resource settings, it is rarely offered in low-resource settings. This study explores the experiences and perspectives of oncology health care professionals in Uganda to identify contextual barriers and facilitators to addressing oncofertility in low-resource settings. Methods: Using ground theory, we conducted in-depth face-to-face interviews of health care professionals managing pediatric patients at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI). Using a systematic, semi-structured interview guide, participants were asked open-ended questions about their understanding of fertility preservation and their perspectives on implementing this care at their institution. Although all the eligible health care providers were interviewed, interview transcripts were uploaded into NVivo version 12 and openly coded as per theoretical requirements. Codes were refined into categories and later into structured themes. Results: Twelve health care professionals were interviewed. Most participants identified as female (n = 9). Their role in the medical team varied from nurses (n = 6), medical officers (n = 3), pediatric oncologists (n = 2), and pediatric oncology fellow (n = 1). Six themes were noted as follows: (1) importance of information, (2) importance of future fertility, (3) inadequate consideration to future fertility, (4) communication barriers, (5) inadequate knowledge, and (6) resource barriers. Conclusion: Although health care providers at the UCI face contextual barriers to addressing future fertility among patients with pediatric cancer, they value preserving fertility in this population. Future initiatives that aim to introduce oncofertility care in low-resource settings should prioritize educating providers and building capacity to meet the oncofertility needs in this setting.

Health Care Professionals' Perspectives Before and After Use of eDialogue for Team-Based Digital Communication Across Settings: Qualitative Study.

Orthopedic surgical treatment is a transversal task that requires the active involvement of patients, relatives, and health care professionals (HCPs) across various settings. However, after hospital discharge, communication is challenged and undertaken primarily by phone. New digital communication solutions have the potential to create a space for seamless and patient-centered dialogue across discipline and sector boundaries. When evaluating new communication solutions, knowledge about HCPs' needs and perspectives of use must be explored, as it is they who are responsible for implementing changes in practice. This study aimed to (1) investigate HCPs' perceptions of current communication pathways (phase 1) and (2) explore their experiences of using a simple messenger-like solution (eDialogue) for team-based digital communication across settings (phase 2). We used a triangulation of qualitative data collection techniques, including document analysis, observations, focus groups, and individual interviews of HCPs before (n=28) and after (n=12) their use of eDialogue. Data collection and analysis were inspired by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to specifically understand facilitators and barriers to implementation as perceived by HCPs. HCPs perceive current communication pathways as insufficient for both patients and themselves. Phone calls are disruptive, and there is a lack of direct communication modalities when communication crosses sector boundaries. HCPs experienced the use of eDialogue as a quick and easy way for timely interdisciplinary interaction with patients and other HCPs across settings; however, concerns were raised about time consumption. eDialogue can provide needed support for interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral patient-centered communication. However, future studies of this solution should address its impact and the use of resources.

Trust matters: The Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in Europe Study.

This article presents the design of a seven-country study focusing on childhood vaccines, Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in Europe (VAX-TRUST), developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study consists of (a) situation analysis of vaccine hesitancy (examination of individual, socio-demographic and macro-level factors of vaccine hesitancy and analysis of media coverage on vaccines and vaccination and (b) participant observation and in-depth interviews of healthcare professionals and vaccine-hesitant parents. These analyses were used to design interventions aimed at increasing awareness on the complexity of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals involved in discussing childhood vaccines with parents. We present the selection of countries and regions, the conceptual basis of the study, details of the data collection and the process of designing and evaluating the interventions, as well as the potential impact of the study. Laying out our research design serves as an example of how to translate complex public health issues into social scientific study and methods.

Unbundling the complexity of performance management of healthcare providers in the Middle East

Purpose Previous research provides adequate evidence on performance management (PM) for hospitals and healthcare providers; however, less is known about their individual and PM appraisal process. Additionally, there is limited research exploring PM in the Middle Eastern context. This study investigates PM practices in the Middle Eastern healthcare industry.Design/methodology/approach This study adopts the qualitative research methodology through semi-structured interviews of healthcare professionals in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Thematic analysis was adopted for analyzing this qualitative data.Findings The main findings have uncovered different facets of appraisal challenges for both the appraiser (i.e. manager) and the appraisee (i.e. employee). These challenges include communication deficits, lack of goal setting standards and regular meeting updates in order to ensure employee satisfaction and motivation in the workplace.Research limitations/implications This study has significant implications for policymakers in Middle Eastern hospitals in terms of implementing PM for their staff. Moreover, future studies can conduct in-depth analysis and provide comparison between public and private sectors in the Gulf countries.Originality/value This study is one of the first to portray challenges involved in conducting PM in the Middle East healthcare sector specifically in the UAE and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), both from the perspectives of the appraiser and appraisee.

Clinical practice guideline recommendation summaries for pediatric oncology health care professionals: A qualitative study.

To develop a summary format of clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations to improve understandability among health care professionals. We developed a summary format based on current research and used the "Think Aloud" technique in one-on-one cognitive interviews to iteratively improve it. Interviews of health care professionals from Children's Oncology Group-member, National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program sites were conducted. After every five interviews (a round), responses were reviewed, and changes made to the format until it was well understood and no new, substantive suggestions for revision were raised. We took a directed (deductive) approach to content analysis of the interview notes to identify concerns related to recommendation summary usability, understandability, validity, applicability and visual appeal. During seven rounds of interviews with 33 health care professionals, we identified important factors that influenced understandability. Participants found understanding weak recommendations more challenging than strong recommendations. Understanding was improved when the term 'conditional' recommendation was used instead of 'weak' recommendation. Participants found a Rationale section to be very helpful but desired more information when a recommendation entailed a practice change. In the final format, the recommendation strength is clearly indicated in the title, highlighted, and defined within a text box. The rationale for the recommendation is in a column on the left, with supporting evidence on the right. In a bulleted list, the Rationale section describes the benefits and harms and additional factors, such as implementation, that were considered by the CPG developers. Each bullet under the supporting evidence section indicates the level of evidence with an explanation and the supporting studies with hyperlinks when applicable. A summary format to present strong and conditional recommendations was created through an iterative interview process. The format is straightforward, making it easy for organizations and CPG developers to use it to communicate recommendations clearly to intended users.

Patient and Healthcare Professional Insights of Home- and Remote-Based Clinical Assessment: A Qualitative Study from Spain and Brazil to Determine Implications for Clinical Trials and Current Practice.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic has accelerated the growing trend towards using home- and remote-based medical testing (H/RMT). The aim of this study was to gather insights and explore the opinions of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Spain and Brazil regarding H/RMT and the impact of decentralised clinical trials. This qualitative study consisted of in-depth open question interviews of HCPs and patients/caregivers followed by a workshop that aimed to determine the advantages and barriers to H/RMT in general, and in the context of clinical trials. There were 47 participants in the interviews (37 patients, 2 caregivers, 8 HCPs) and 32 in the validation workshops (13 patients, 7 caregivers, 12 HCPs). The main advantages for the use of H/RMT in current practice were the comfort and convenience, the ability to improve the relationship between HCPs and patients and personalise patient care, and the increased patient awareness towards their disease. Barriers to H/RMT included accessibility, digitalisation, and the training requirements for both HCPs and patients. Furthermore, according to the Brazilian participants, there is a general distrust in the logistical management of H/RMT. Patients indicated that the convenience of H/RMT did not influence their decision to participate in a clinical trial, with the main reason for participating in a clinical trial being to improve health; however, H/RMT in clinical research does aid adherence to the long-term follow-up associated with trials and provides access to patients living far from the clinical sites. Insights from patients and HCPs suggest that the advantages of H/RMT may outweigh the barriers, and that social, cultural and geographical factors and the HCP-patient relationship are critical aspects to be considered. Moreover, the convenience of H/RMT does not appear to be a driver for participating in a clinical trial but can facilitate patient diversity and study adherence.

What went right during the COVID crisis: The capabilities of local actors and lasting innovations in oncology care and research.

This article will elaborate how oncology care and research was adapted during the COVID pandemic in the Metropole of Lyon (France), including the lasting innovations that came out of the crisis. The research method involved 22 semi-structured qualitative interviews of healthcare professionals, managers, and researchers in the Lyon, France region coming from both public and private academic hospitals. The interviews took place from February 2021-December 2022 in order to assess the long-term adaptations and innovations in cancer care organization in the post-COVID era. The main results show adaptations and innovations in 1) new processes and resources to facilitate disciplinary and interdisciplinary work; 2) harmonization and streamlining of patient journeys. In the discussion section, we will mobilize the capabilities approach, an interdisciplinary social sciences approach that focuses on the capabilities of persons to be and to do, to elaborate the conditions by which local actors were able to be agile, to adapt and to innovate in spite of the healthcare emergency and in coherence with their professional and personal values.

Medication safety for intensive care patients transferring to a hospital ward: A Hierarchical Task Analysis

Aims and objectivesTo identify the task steps involved in intensive care patients transferring to a hospital ward and their potential for human errors, and to prioritise areas to improve medication safety. BackgroundIntensive care patients recovering to transfer to a hospital ward experience challenges to care continuity and safety, including medication safety. Medication errors are common on this interface of patient care, contributing to the risk of adverse drug events on the hospital ward and beyond. Human factors are an important consideration in these transfer-related medication errors. MethodsA hierarchical task analysis, based on a goal of safe continuity of medication for intensive care patients on transfer to a hospital ward, was developed from local processes taken from four north of England hospital Trusts with electronic prescribing systems. The task analysis was developed and refined by the research team, incorporating documentary review of policies and procedures, and healthcare professional interviews. Failure modes for the key task steps impacting directly on patient medication safety were identified. Finally, ten intensive care healthcare professionals, individually graded each failure mode (1-5) in terms of the probability, criticality and detectability. Median grades for each parameter were used to determine an overall clinical risk score for each task step. ResultsTen task steps were identified (one conditional), comprising a total of 56 subordinate task steps (two conditional). Conditionality was based on integrated electronic prescribing system resource across the care interface. Thirty-four of the 56 (61%) subordinate task steps were considered by the research team to specifically involve medication continuity or safety aspects. Action omissions (operation, check, information communication) accounted for failure modes in twenty-four of the 34 (71%) task steps. Most task steps (25/34 (74%)) had one or more recovery steps, providing further safety opportunities. The medication review task for reviewing and re-introducing long-term medication had the highest cumulative risk score. The top six clinical risk scores for the failure modes involved task steps with some element of communication around medicines. ConclusionsThe safe continuity of medication for intensive care patients on transfer to a hospital ward is complex and prone to human error. Failure mode analysis indicated that medication review on intensive care prior to patient transfer, and communication around medication changes and plans, are particularly important risks that require addressing in any intervention developed to improve medication safety in this patient care transition.

361 EXPLORING THE EXPERIENCES OF HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS (HCPS) WORKING IN ACUTE STROKE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the delivery of stroke care internationally. The INAS (Irish National Audit for Stroke) report 2020, found that there was no significant disruption to stroke services as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about the experiences of Health-Care Professionals (HCPs) who were working in stroke care during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explored the experiences of HCPs working in acute stroke care in an Irish hospital group during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling, 16 semi-structured interviews of healthcare professionals from six specialities (Medicine, Nursing, Physiotherapy, Occupational therapy, Speech and Language Therapy and Medical Social Work) in two model three hospitals and one model four hospital were conducted. Interviews were virtual. Analysis was completed using the Braun and Clarke six-step method. This research was approved by the Royal College of Surgeons Research Ethics committee and permission was secured from the Stroke Clinical lead at each site to conduct interviews. Results Two main themes emerged: (i) Disruption of the end-to-end acute stroke pathway and (ii) Opportunities of the pandemic to develop a new model of care. Theme (i) suggests challenges were experienced in emergency care, access to Stroke Units (SU) beds and multidisciplinary teams (MDT). In theme (ii) participants described opportunities in telemedicine, the development of new rehabilitation and existing Early Supported Discharge (ESD) pathways. Conclusion This study highlights the lived experience of HCPs, the disruption to the stroke pathway and the opportunities as a result of the pandemic. It demonstrates the need for further exploration of, telemedicine, alternative rehabilitation pathways in stroke care and the need for a wider stroke education programme for HCPs working outside stroke. Finally, this study highlights the unwavering resilience and empathy of HCPs working in Stroke.

The Application of the Principles of Responsible AI on Social Media Marketing for Digital Health

Social media enables medical professionals and authorities to share, disseminate, monitor, and manage health-related information digitally through online communities such as Twitter and Facebook. Simultaneously, artificial intelligence (AI) powered social media offers digital capabilities for organizations to select, screen, detect and predict problems with possible solutions through digital health data. Both the patients and healthcare professionals have benefited from such improvements. However, arising ethical concerns related to the use of AI raised by stakeholders need scrutiny which could help organizations obtain trust, minimize privacy invasion, and eventually facilitate the responsible success of AI-enabled social media operations. This paper examines the impact of responsible AI on businesses using insights from analysis of 25 in-depth interviews of health care professionals. The exploratory analysis conducted revealed that abiding by the responsible AI principles can allow healthcare businesses to better take advantage of the improved effectiveness of their social media marketing initiatives with their users. The analysis is further used to offer research propositions and conclusions, and the contributions and limitations of the study have been discussed.

Improving transparent team communication with the ‘Glass Door’ decal communication tool: a mixed methods analysis of family and staff perspectives

ObjectiveTo determine the value and perspectives of intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare professionals (HCPs) and families about the Glass Door (GD) decal team communication tool.DesignQuality improvement methodology was used to...

Satisfaction and Usability of an Information and Communications Technology-Based System by Clinically Healthy Patients With COVID-19 and Medical Professionals: Cross-sectional Survey and Focus Group Interview Study.

BackgroundDigital health care is an important strategy in the war against COVID-19. South Korea introduced living and treatment support centers (LTSCs) to control regional outbreaks and care for patients with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19. Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) introduced information and communications technology (ICT)–based solutions to manage clinically healthy patients with COVID-19.ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate satisfaction and usability by patients and health professionals in the optimal use of a mobile app and wearable device that SNUH introduced to the LTSC for clinically healthy patients with COVID-19.MethodsOnline surveys and focus group interviews were conducted to collect quantitative and qualitative data.ResultsRegarding usability testing of the wearable device, perceived usefulness had the highest mean score of 4.45 (SD 0.57) points out of 5. Regarding usability of the mobile app, perceived usefulness had the highest mean score of 4.62 (SD 0.48) points out of 5. Regarding satisfaction items for the mobile app among medical professionals, the “self-reporting” item had the highest mean score of 4.42 (SD 0.58) points out of 5. In focus group interviews of health care professionals, hospital information system interfacing was the most important functional requirement for ICT-based COVID-19 telemedicine.ConclusionsImprovement of patient safety and reduction of the burden on medical staff were the expected positive outcomes. Stability and reliability of the device, patient education, accountability, and reimbursement issues should be considered as part of the development of remote patient monitoring. In responding to a novel contagious disease, telemedicine and a wearable device were shown to be useful during a global crisis.

We've got what the NHS ultimately intended for us: Experiences of community engagement in rural primary care services change

Policy promotes service user engagement in health services design and delivery. Various tools exist to support the engagement of citizens within health services design. We consider community engagement within the context of primary care delivery in remote and rural areas of Scotland. We present findings from three years of qualitative work with community members and healthcare professionals within five different remote and rural areas, undergoing primary care service changes. 364 interviews were carried out with community members and healthcare professionals on their experiences of, and feelings towards, the services changes. A key theme to emerge from our thematic analysis of the qualitative data is experiences of community engagement. In this paper we present our analysis of this theme. We identify different types of community engagement discourse within community and healthcare professional interviews. We illustrate these themes and, through consideration of five case study areas, demonstrate how these discourses can co-exist within the same service change process. The paper presents our sub-themes on community engagement relating to discourses of inclusion and exclusion; the role of the General Practitioner (GP); conceptualisations of the organisational role of the NHS; discourses of fear and, finally, community members understandings of what it means to be active “agents of change” (or not) within health services redesign. We argue that context is as important as method when it comes to facilitating a positive community engagement experience for citizens. Our findings have relevance to the emerging social science literature on citizen experience of public sector community engagement activities.

Semi-structured healthcare professional interviews to explore their preferences for the assessment and optimisation of older adults facing major gastrointestinal surgery

Introduction: There are few age and fitness specific evidence-based guidelines for major gastrointestinal surgery. Adequate assessment of fitness and frailty and subsequent targeted peri-operative interventions to enhance resilience is often lacking. Understanding how clinicians make decisions regarding suitability for major surgery and the value they place and availability of different optimisation strategies may help to understand variation in practice.

Digital Monitoring and Management of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Cancer Immunotherapy and Its Impact on Quality of Clinical Care: Interview and Survey Study Among Health Care Professionals and Patients.

BackgroundCancer immunotherapy (CIT), as a monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, has been shown to extend overall survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients experience treatment-related symptoms that they are required to recall between hospital visits. Digital patient monitoring and management (DPMM) tools may improve clinical practice by allowing real-time symptom reporting.ObjectiveThis proof-of-concept pilot study assessed patient and health care professional (HCP) adoption of our DPMM tool, which was designed specifically for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with CIT, and the tool’s impact on clinical care.MethodsFour advisory boards were assembled in order to co-develop a drug- and indication-specific CIT (CIT+) module, based on a generic CIT DPMM tool from Kaiku Health, Helsinki, Finland. A total of 45 patients treated with second-line single-agent CIT (ie, atezolizumab or otherwise) for advanced or metastatic NSCLC, as well as HCPs, whose exact number was decided by the clinics, were recruited from 10 clinics in Germany, Finland, and Switzerland between February and May 2019. All clinics were provided with the Kaiku Health generic CIT DPMM tool, including our CIT+ module. Data on user experience, overall satisfaction, and impact of the tool on clinical practice were collected using anonymized surveys—answers ranged from 1 (low agreement) to 5 (high agreement)—and HCP interviews; surveys and interviews consisted of closed-ended Likert scales and open-ended questions, respectively. The first survey was conducted after 2 months of DPMM use, and a second survey and HCP interviews were conducted at study end (ie, after ≥3 months of DPMM use); only a subgroup of HCPs from each clinic responded to the surveys and interviews. Survey data were analyzed quantitatively; interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated into English, where applicable, for coding and qualitative thematic analysis.ResultsAmong interim survey respondents (N=51: 13 [25%] nurses, 11 [22%] physicians, and 27 [53%] patients), mean rankings of the tool’s seven usability attributes ranged from 3.2 to 4.4 (nurses), 3.7 to 4.5 (physicians), and 3.7 to 4.2 (patients). At the end-of-study survey (N=48: 19 [40%] nurses, 8 [17%] physicians, and 21 [44%] patients), most respondents agreed that the tool facilitated more efficient and focused discussions between patients and HCPs (nurses and patients: mean rating 4.2, SD 0.8; physicians: mean rating 4.4, SD 0.8) and allowed HCPs to tailor discussions with patients (mean rating 4.35, SD 0.65). The standalone tool was well integrated into HCP daily clinical workflow (mean rating 3.80, SD 0.75), enabled workflow optimization between physicians and nurses (mean rating 3.75, SD 0.80), and saved time by decreasing phone consultations (mean rating 3.75, SD 1.00) and patient visits (mean rating 3.45, SD 1.20). Workload was the most common challenge of tool use among respondents (12/19, 63%).ConclusionsOur results demonstrate high user satisfaction and acceptance of DPMM tools by HCPs and patients, and highlight the improvements to clinical care in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with CIT monotherapy. However, further integration of the tool into the clinical information technology data flow is required. Future studies or registries using our DPMM tool may provide insights into significant effects on patient quality of life or health-economic benefits.

System dynamics modelling to formulate policy interventions to optimise antibiotic prescribing in hospitals

Multiple strategies have been used in the National Health System (NHS) in England to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing and consumption in order to tackle antimicrobial resistance. These strategies have included, among others, restricting dispensing, introduction of prescribing guidelines, use of clinical audit, and performance reviews as well as strategies aimed at changing the prescribing behaviour of clinicians. However, behavioural interventions have had limited effect in optimising doctors’ antibiotic prescribing practices. This study examines the determinants of decision-making for antibiotic prescribing in hospitals in the NHS. A system dynamics model was constructed to capture structural and behavioural influences to simulate doctors’ prescribing practices. Data from the literature, patient records, healthcare professional interviews and survey responses were used to parameterise the model. The scenario simulation shows maximum improvements in guideline compliance are achieved when compliance among senior staff is increased, combined with fast laboratory turnaround of blood cultures, and microbiologist review. Improving guideline compliance of junior staff alone has limited impact. This first use of system dynamics modelling to study antibiotic prescribing decision-making demonstrates the applicability of the methodology for design and evaluation of future policies and interventions.

Digital Follow-Up Application for Cancer Patients - Value Mechanisms Regarding Health Professionals' Work.

This study examined the value mechanisms of a digital cancer follow-up application (CFUA). Value is defined as the health outcomes achieved per resources used. The focus was on how the digital health intervention (DHI) affects the professionals' work. The research was conducted through interviews of healthcare professionals in the empirical context of gynecological cancer clinic at a university hospital in Finland. The identified key mechanisms were improved coordination and optimized care level. The CFUA improves coordination through reducing time restrictions of work, as the professionals have more chances to time their contacts and plan their work. The CFUA helps in optimizing care level, as the application can effectively filter patients to either nurses or physicians according to symptoms. Coordination mechanism is closely connected to other healthcare value mechanisms, such as reducing waste and supply management. This study increases understanding of DHI value potential recognition, and how value can be actualized.

São Paulo State Liver Transplantation Supply Chain Study

BackgroundThe number of liver transplantations is increasing worldwide, and Brazil ranks in the second position. It has one of the biggest public health care systems, which is responsible for the coordination and financial funding of transplantation procedures. Meeting the demands of such a large system of transplantation has become a challenge, particularly when attempting to minimize costs of scarce and expensive resources. The aim of this study was to investigate the process of donation, the retrieval of organs, and the transplantation itself using engineering methods based on logistics analyses. MethodsThree steps were used: study planning, data gathering, and data analysis. Researchers surveyed professionals to acquire raw information based on their observations, experience, and knowledge. Then, a data analysis was conducted, putting together all the information gathered during the previous steps. Bias was removed, and conflicting perceptions were resolved in order to have a standard view on the transplantation process. ResultsData was gathered between 2014 and 2018 and included 5502 liver donors and 2678 (48.7%) patients who received liver transplants organs. A total of 2824 organs were refused because of logistics issues (transport and handling). Interviews of health care professionals enabled the design of a process map in which 4 stakeholders were identified: patient, physician, organ, and information. ConclusionsThe liver transplantation process is analyzed based on a supply chain methodology applying this knowledge and putting together medical and engineering sciences to promote better efficiency and outcomes for the transplantation program. Future studies should focus on the implementation of these ideas aiming to promote optimization gains in any step of the process.

MP74-17 A NEW MODEL OF CARE FOR MEN WITH EMOTIONAL AND SEXUAL CONCERNS AFTER ROBOTIC SURGERY FOR PROSTATE CANCER (MOCA)- A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy IV (MP74)1 Apr 2020MP74-17 A NEW MODEL OF CARE FOR MEN WITH EMOTIONAL AND SEXUAL CONCERNS AFTER ROBOTIC SURGERY FOR PROSTATE CANCER (MOCA)- A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES Sanchia Goonewardene*, Raj Persad, and Hanif Motiwala Sanchia Goonewardene*Sanchia Goonewardene* More articles by this author , Raj PersadRaj Persad More articles by this author , and Hanif MotiwalaHanif Motiwala More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000960.017AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer is an increasingly diagnosed problem. Previously, a pathway for patients post prostatectomy had been developed from patient focus group results. This was developed into a document for PCUK and NICE endorsed. The next step is a feasibility study to see if this pathway is a viable option for patients. METHODS: 20 patients were contacted via telephone and asked their opinion on the previously developed pathway, over a one month period, as part of quality improvement. Details were recorded as part of paitent reported outcome measures. RESULTS: 20 patients were contacted and 100% responded. Thematic analyses led to identification of the following subject areas and generation of overarching themes. The subject areas were drawn out of the patient focus group and healthcare professional interviews, after manual tabulation. Subject areas were identified by being highlighted and the overarching themes into which these fit were named. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study demonstrates areas for further development of this pathway prior to implementation. This study highlights the acceptance of this pathway by patients having had prostate cancer surgery. Source of Funding: none © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e1138-e1138 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Sanchia Goonewardene* More articles by this author Raj Persad More articles by this author Hanif Motiwala More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Teaching cross-cultural design thinking for healthcare

ObjectivesArtificial intelligence (AI) is poised to transform breast cancer care. However, most scientists, engineers, and clinicians are not prepared to contribute to the AI revolution in healthcare. In this paper, we describe our experiences teaching a new undergraduate course for American students that aims to prepare the next generation for cross-cultural designthinking, which we believe is crucial for AI to achieve its full potential in breast cancer care. Materials and methodsThe key course activities are planning, conducting, and interpreting interviews of healthcare professionals from both Portugal and the United States. Since the course is offered as a short-term faculty-led study abroad program in Portugal, students are able to explore the impact of culture on healthcare delivery and the design of healthcare technologies. ResultsThe learning assessments demonstrated student growth in several areas pertinent for future development of AI for breast cancer care. With respect to understanding breast cancer care, prior to taking this course, most students had underestimated the impact of cancer and its treatment on women’s quality of life and most were unaware of the importance of multidisciplinary care teams. Regarding AI in medicine, students became more mindful of data privacy issues and the need to consider the effect of AI on healthcare professionals. ConclusionThis course illustrates the potential benefits for AI in medicine of introducing future scientists, engineers, and clinicians to cross cultural design-thinking early in their educational experiences.