Interview Questions Research Articles

Validation of the adult asthma epidemiological score: a secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA population-based study.

The A2 score is an eight-question patient-reported outcome measure that has been validated for ruling in (score ≥4) and ruling out (score 0-1) asthma. However, this screening tool has been validated in a cohort similar to the derivation cohort used. This study aims to validate the predictive accuracy of the A2 score in a primary care population against general practitioner (GP) clinical assessment and to determine whether the proposed cut-offs are the most appropriate. This accuracy study is a secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA population-based study. Primary care centres in Portugal. Random adult participants answered the A2 score by phone interview. Those with an A2 score ≥1 (plus 5% with an A2 score of 0) were invited to a diagnostic visit carried out by a GP to confirm or not a diagnosis of asthma. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A total of 1283 participants (median 54 (p25-p75 43-66) years; 60% women) were analysed. The A2 score showed high discriminatory power in identifying asthma, with an area under the ROC curve of 82.9% (95% CI 80.4% to 85.4%). The proposed cut-off ≥4 was the most appropriate to rule in asthma (specificity 83.1%, positive predictive value 62.4%, accuracy 78%). Similarly, the proposed cut-off<2 was the most suitable for excluding asthma (sensitivity 92.7%, negative predictive value 93.7%, accuracy 60.5%). The A2 score is a useful tool to identify patients with asthma in a primary care population. NCT0516961.

Discrimination experiences of transgender individuals in healthcare: an interview study on the perspective of health professionals specializing in the treatment of transgender individuals

BackgroundExperiences of discrimination in healthcare lead to poorer mental and physical health for transgender individuals. There is evidence that trans-specialists, i.e. health professionals specializing in transgender care, are an important source of discrimination experienced by transgender individuals in healthcare. In this qualitative interview study, we explored the reasons for this possibly surprising finding by analyzing subjective views of trans-specialists on various issues related to discrimination of transgender individuals.MethodsWe conducted 20 semi-structured, qualitative, exploratory interviews with healthcare professionals specializing in transgender care. Interview questions were developed based on an extensive literature analysis and results of previous research on the topic. The interviews were conducted online, were digitally recorded and transcribed. Data analysis was conducted using the methods of content analysis and thematic analysis.ResultsThe interviewees had great difficulty giving a consistent definition of the concept of gender identity. Most of them saw it as a self-determination of a transgender individual. Although herewith emphasizing the autonomy of transgender individuals, most trans-specialists felt that they had to be convinced of their patient’s transsexuality to carry out treatment. Most trans-specialists reported having had doubts about whether some transgender individuals were suffering from gender incongruence or not. There was also ambiguity among interviewees about whether transsexuality is a mental illness.ConclusionsWe were able to identify specific topics that can cause discrimination experiences on the part of transgender individuals in their contact with trans-specialists. These include the vagueness of the construct of gender identity and the ambivalence between respect for the autonomy of transgender individuals and the validation of the diagnosis “transsexuality”. Also, uncertainties regarding the classification of transsexuality as a mental illness can lead to experiences of discrimination. Furthermore, our results imply that trans-specialists might remember own discriminatory behavior less than it actually took place. Our results can contribute to the development of specific measures to avoid discrimination experiences of transgender individuals in contact with trans-specialists. These should include a reflection on one’s own gender identity and training on mechanisms of discrimination.

Long-term outcomes of extracapsular tonsillectomy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults

Background Tonsillectomy is an effective treatment option for obstructive sleep apnoea in selected adult patients, but there has been a lack of long-term follow-up data. Objectives To analyse the long-term outcomes of extracapsular tonsillectomy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults, with the longest follow-up periods to date. Materials and methods We recruited adults who had undergone extracapsular tonsillectomy because of obstructive sleep apnoea between 2004 and 2018 in the Hospital District of Southwest Finland. A new home sleep study, questionnaires, and a structured phone interview were conducted on these patients 4–17 years after surgical treatment. The primary outcome was the change in the apnoea-hypopnoea index. Results The mean apnoea-hypopnoea index was reduced from 27.1 preoperatively to 14.1 after the long-term follow-up (mean 12 years), and the mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale score decreased from 9.2 to 4.6. The long-term surgical success rate was 38.5%. Four out of five patients would choose the surgery again according to the phone interview. Conclusions and significance This study supports the notion that extracapsular tonsillectomy alone can be considered as a surgical treatment option for selected adults with obstructive sleep apnoea and tonsillar hypertrophy. For most of the patients, the obstructive sleep apnoea is alleviated.

Self-Reported Difficulty with and Assistance Needed by People with Spinal Cord Injury to Prepare Meals at Home

Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience an increased risk for obesity and cardiometabolic disease. Recommendations to prevent and treat obesity for those with SCI follow those of the US Department of Agriculture to adopt a healthy eating pattern that includes eating a variety of fruits, vegetables, grains, dairy, and protein, plus limiting added sugars, saturated fats, and sodium. Yet, people with SCI eat too many calories, fat, and carbohydrates and too few fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. The study is based on secondary analyses of SCI participants (n = 122) who enrolled in a weight loss study to determine how SCI may impact their ability to prepare food at home. We hypothesize those with higher-level spinal injuries (specifically, those with cervical versus those with thoracic or lumbar/sacral injuries) experience significantly greater difficulty and are more likely to rely on others’ assistance to perform meal preparation tasks. Physiologic (weight, BMI, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c) and self-reported data (demographic plus responses to the Life Habits Short Survey and meal prep items) were collected at baseline and qualitative data were obtained from a subsample after the intervention during phone interviews. Participants’ average age was 50 ± 14.7 years old, they lived with SCI for an average of 13.0 ± 13.1 years, and their average BMI was 32.0 ± 6.5. Participants were predominantly white (76.1%) men (54.1%) who had some college education (76.3%), though only 28.8% worked. A substantial proportion of respondents (30% to 68%) reported difficulty across the 13 tasks related to purchasing and preparing meals, with a proxy reported as the most common assistance type used across all tasks (17% to 42%). Forty-nine percent reported difficulty preparing simple meals, with 29% reporting a proxy does the task. More than half reported difficulty using the oven and stove, though between 60% to 70% reported no difficulty using other kitchen appliances (e.g., coffee machine, food processor, can opener), the refrigerator, or microwave. There was a significant difference in kitchen function by injury level. Those living with cervical-level injuries had significantly greater limitations than those with thoracic-level injuries. Spouses, other family members, and caregivers were most likely to serve as proxies and these individuals exerted both positive and negative influences on respondents’ dietary intake, based on qualitative data obtained during interviews. The results suggest that many people living with SCI experience functional and environmental barriers that impact their ability to prepare food and use kitchen appliances. Future research should examine how SCI-related functional limitations, transportation access, accessibility of the kitchen, ability to use appliances, availability of financial resources, and assistance by others to prepare foods impact people’s ability to follow a healthy eating pattern.

Genre-Based Analysis of Move Structure of Job Interviews at Algerian Universities

Genre-Based Analysis of Move Structure of Job Interviews at Algerian Universities

I'm in Charge, But Not Always in Control: A Qualitative Exploration of Female's Beliefs and Knowledge About Their Pelvic Pain.

Beliefs and knowledge about pain can influence how an individual approaches pain management. At present, there have been no investigations into the beliefs and knowledge that females hold about their pelvic pain; therefore, pain intervention approaches may not be targeted at current patient understandings. Exploring beliefs and knowledge may help inform and subsequently improve pain intervention outcomes for pelvic pain by allowing more tailored content to be delivered. This study aimed to identify beliefs and knowledge that females hold about their pelvic pain. Semi-structured interviews (n=12) were conducted. Based on the Common Sense Model, interview questions investigated participants' beliefs and knowledge related to the identity (diagnostic labels), cause, consequence, control, and timeline of their pelvic pain. Transcribed interviews were analysed using an Interpretive Description Framework. Participants reported holding biopsychosocial understandings of pain; however, many described their own pain experience in a way that was more aligned with the biomedical model of pain, suggesting incongruence in pain understandings. Participants valued their ability to take charge of their pain management, highlighting bodily autonomy and being proactive in pain management approaches. This approach to management did not provide total control over participants' pelvic pain. Pelvic pain was perceived as disruptive of life, both at present and into the future, with predictability of pain varying over time. This study provides insight into the perspectives of females with pelvic pain. Recommendations for clinicians are provided with a focus on delivering targeted education and equipping patients with helpful representations of their pain.

Longitudinal 'oral board exams' to maintain educational continuity.

Longitudinal 'oral board exams' to maintain educational continuity.

시나리오기반 시뮬레이션실습 교육의 효과와 경험에 대한 연구

Objectives The purposes of this study were to investigated the effectiveness of scenario-based simulation prac-tice education for nursing students. Methods Data were collected through a questionnaire from 169 senior nursing students enrolled at a university in J city between April 15 and June 30, 2024. Quantitative data were gathered from these students, and qualitative data were collected through focus group interviews with 15 students who consented to participate. The quantita-tive data collection was conducted in two phases, pre- and post-surveys, using self-report questionnaires to as-sess problem-solving skills, critical thinking disposition, self-directed learning ability, communication skills, and grit. The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests. Qualitative data collection was conducted after the course grades were fully disclosed, as they could influence the research outcomes. Focus group interviews were held with three groups, each consisting of five students, and each interview lasted between 1.5 to 2 hours. The interview questions were provided in advance to allow participants time to reflect. During the qualitative data collection, four researchers took on roles as a moderator, two recorders, and one observer. All in-terviews were recorded and documented. Results In this study, quantitative research results showed that after scenario-based simulation practice educa-tion, nursing students' problem-solving abilities (t=-8.02, p=&lt;.001), critical thinking disposition (t=-6.86, p=&lt;.001), self-directed learning abilities (t=-6.10, p=&lt;.001), communication skills (t=-3.62, p=&lt;.001), and grit (t=-7.26, p=&lt;.001) significantly improved. The qualitative research results, obtained through focus group inter-views, revealed three themes: the coexistence of positive and negative feelings towards the new educational method, the expansion and growth of knowledge through new educational experiences, and self-reflection through role experiences. Conclusions Through scenario-based simulation practice education, students had diverse experiences and showed improvements in cognitive aspects such as problem-solving abilities, critical thinking disposition, and communication skills. It was also confirmed that the integration of theory and practice and clinical performance abilities were enhanced. This study suggests that there is a continuous need for research comparing scenar-io-based simulation practice education with other teaching methods, involving comparison and control groups.

Automated speech recognition bias in personnel selection: The case of automatically scored job interviews.

Organizations, researchers, and software increasingly use automatic speech recognition (ASR) to transcribe speech to text. However, ASR can be less accurate for (i.e., biased against) certain demographic subgroups. This is concerning, given that the machine-learning (ML) models used to automatically score video interviews use ASR transcriptions of interviewee responses as inputs. To address these concerns, we investigate the extent of ASR bias and its effects in automatically scored interviews. Specifically, we compare the accuracy of ASR transcription for English as a second language (ESL) versus non-ESL interviewees, people of color (and Black interviewees separately) versus White interviewees, and male versus female interviewees. Then, we test whether ASR bias causes bias in ML model scores-both in terms of differential convergent correlations (i.e., subgroup differences in correlations between observed and ML scores) and differential means (i.e., shifts in subgroup differences from observed to ML scores). To do so, we apply one human and four ASR transcription methods to two samples of mock video interviews (Ns = 1,014 and 414), and then we train and test models using these different transcripts to score multiple constructs. We observed significant bias in the commercial ASR services across nearly all comparisons, with the magnitude of bias differing across the ASR services. However, the transcription bias did not translate into meaningful measurement bias for the ML interview scores-whether in terms of differential convergent correlations or means. We discuss what these results mean for the nature of bias, fairness, and validity of ML models for scoring verbal open-ended responses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Investigation of the Concept Images of Mathematics Educators and Preservice Mathematics Teachers Regarding Slope, Rate of Change, and Derivative

The aim of this study is to examine the concept images of mathematics educators and pre-service elementary mathematics teachers regarding the relationships between the concepts of slope, rate of change and derivative. Four mathematics educators working in different state universities and responsible for Analysis courses, three pre-service elementary mathematics teachers who successfully completed the Calculus 1 course at a state university, and four pre-service elementary mathematics teachers who successfully completed the Calculus 1 and Calculus 2 courses participated in the study. In order to determine the concept images of the participants about the concepts of slope, rate of change and derivative, the participants were asked semi-structured interview questions prepared by the researcher and application questions including the second stage questions. The audio recordings obtained from the interviews were transcribed and then the second stage questions were applied to the participants. The second stage questions were received in writing from the participants and analysed by the researcher through descriptive content analysis. As a result of this study, mathematics educators were able to use the concept images they had in the first stage questions in the second stage questions. On the other hand, pre-service elementary mathematics teachers were able to use the concept images they had in the first stage questions in the second stage questions.

Identification of Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of a New Pain Assessment Mobile Health Application by Family Carers of People with Dementia: A Qualitative Study

This study identified potential barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a medical device in the form of a mobile health (mHealth) application, (app) called PainChek®, by family carers of individuals with dementia in the Australian community setting. Focus groups and a phone interview took place with family carers and healthcare professionals. Data were analysed thematically. 6 family carers and 8 healthcare professionals participated across 2 focus groups and 1 phone interview. Themes related to the user, innovation/PainChek®, and contextual factors were identified. Barriers to use included age, physical limitations, cost, technical issues, misinterpretation of how PainChek® works, and influence of family. Facilitators included a willingness to use mHealth Apps and previous experience. Some themes acted as both barriers and facilitators depending on the situation such as the healthcare team's acceptance. Targeted interventions and support strategies, leveraging facilitators are essential to overcome barriers related to user, intervention, and context and to enhance successful PainChek® implementation, thereby improving pain management in individuals with dementia. Future research is recommended to develop effective implementation strategies to utilise the facilitators and overcome the barriers to improve the implementation of PainChek®.

Speaking Skill Assessment Instrument Validity: An Investigation into Instructors’ Perceptions

To EFL learners, speaking the target language with satisfactory fluency is a highly significant aspect of learning the language. Assessment of learners’ progress and achievement in speaking skills is equally significant to identify the course of further action, whether it is for feedback, placement, or grading. At the English Language Institute (ELI), King Abdulaziz University in Saudi Arabia, learners’ proficiency in spoken English is assessed for end-of-the-term grading using Interview and Speaking Project as test instruments. The Interview questions are random, while the Speaking Project involves collection of materials on a chosen topic and report writing, followed by presentation and question-answer session. An empirical research study was conducted to examine ELI teachers’ perceptions on the reliability and validity of the two assessment instruments to accurately measure learners’ proficiency in speaking skill and meeting the requirements to reflect the learning outcomes designed for the speaking English course. The data were collected through a survey questionnaire and a structured interview. The surveyed instructors were also encouraged to express their opinions on the role of formative assessment in determining learners’ final grades in English speaking skill.

An Empirical Qualitative Investigation into Psychosexual Development in and Sex Education for Autistic Youth: Insights from Autistic and Non-Autistic Young Adults.

The present study was designed to examine autistic and non-autistic young adults' lived experience in psychosexual development and sex education and to solicit recommendations on how to improve sex education programs. Participants included 10 autistic young adults and 10 non-autistic young adults aged 18 to 24 years. The two groups were matched for sex and education level. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted. Participants' responses were analyzed using comparative interpretative phenomenological analysis. Four superordinate themes emerged: (1) "Who am I as a sexual being"; (2) Making sense of psychosexual development; (3) Sources of information; and (4) "Dear developers of sex education programs". Most autistic participants shared feelings of intense anxiety about romantic and sexual relationships, in part due to anticipated difficulties in social communication. Interestingly, although interview questions mostly focused on sex and adolescence, issues surrounding romantic relationships and their links to current self-concept were prominent themes in many autistic participants' responses, suggesting that autism-friendly sex education programs need to address issues related to romance and should target not only adolescents but also young adults. Also, autistic participants learned from peer interactions within the autistic community, highlighting the importance of facilitating peer exchanges and continuous learning beyond completing a program. Regarding delivery format, autistic participants valued concreteness and a mixed-sex small-group setting, and recommended using visual cues, real life examples, and role play. Autistic individuals have unmet psychosexual educational needs. Further research may consider their needs, lived experience, and recommendations when developing new autism-friendly sex education programs.

Paediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the development of patient-specific therapy: ethical perspectives through experts’ opinions

BackgroundResearch for personalised therapies concerning the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in children involves the utilisation of OMICS technologies and Artificial Intelligence (AI).MethodsTo identify specific ethical challenges through the perspective of healthcare professionals, we conducted 10 semi-structured interviews. The development of interview questions for the interviews was preceded by a systematic review of the scientific literature. To address the complexities of paediatric emergency research, informed consent, and data processing, experts with expertise in paediatric intensive care, computer science, and medical law were sought. After the transcription and anonymisation, the analysis followed established guidelines for qualitative content and thematic analysis.ResultsInterviewees highlighted the intricacies of managing consent in personalised SIRS research due to the large amount and complexity of information necessary for autonomous decision-making. Thus, instruments aimed at enhancing the understanding of legal guardians and to empowering the child were appreciated and the need for specific guidelines and establishing standards was expressed. Medical risks were estimated to be low, but the challenges of securing anonymisation and data protection were expected. It was emphasised that risks and benefits cannot be anticipated at this stage. Social justice issues were identified because of possible biases within the research population. Our findings were analysed using current ethical and legal frameworks for research with a focus on the particularities of the patient group and the emergency background. In this particular context, experts advocated for an enabling approach pertaining to AI in combination with OMICS technologies.ConclusionAs with every new technological development, ethical and legal challenges cannot be foreseen for SIRS-personalised treatment. Given this circumstance, experts emphasised the importance of extending the ethics-legal discourse beyond mere restrictions. The organisation of supervision should be reconsidered and not limited only to the precautionary principle, which per se was seen as impeding both the medical progress and clinical flexibility. It was noted that the establishment and monitoring of guidelines were emergent and should evolve through an interdisciplinary discourse. Therefore, it was recommended to enhance the qualifications of physicians in the field of computer science, impart ethics training to AI developers, and involve experts with expertise in medical law and data protection.

An Empirical View of the Extent of Exercising the Education Exception to Copyright in Cultural Heritage Institutions

The article presents findings from a study funded by the Estonian Ministry of Justice titled ‘Extent of Use of Educational Exceptions of Copyright in Cultural Heritage Institutions’. The impetus for this work came from the fact that rights-holders, who are not compensated for the use of copyrighted works and material covered by related rights under the educational exception, desire compensation for such use yet data pertaining to the practices of educators conducting education programmes in cultural heritage institutions are scarce. The study’s results are important for the holders of the rights but also for policymakers and for those providing professional-development courses to the educators such that their practices could be fully aligned with the education exception to copyright. A 105-respondent questionnaire – adapted from an instrument used in a similar study that focused on educators in pre-school education, basic schools, upper secondary schools, vocational-education institutions, institutions for professional higher education, universities, ‘hobby schools’, and continuing-education institutions – among educators who are not copyright experts helped answer the question ‘What is the extent of exercising the education exception to copyright in cultural heritage institutions in Estonia?’. The paper explains the quantitative results further in light of focus-group interviews with seven representatives of cultural heritage institutions, of several types. Also, the results of this study are compared with the findings from the earlier one. The results, which shed light on copyright awareness, the form and extent of copying, etc. in relation to literary and reference works, photographs, musical works, and audiovisual works, indicate that Estonian cultural heritage institutions’ reliance on the education exception is in accordance with copyright law and, therefore, significant changes in related policy are unnecessary. However, responses to the survey and interview questions revealed aspects that could be addressed in designing guidelines and professional-development activities for educators in cultural heritage institutions.

What algorithmic evaluation fails to deliver: respectful treatment and individualized consideration

As firms increasingly depend on artificial intelligence to evaluate people across various contexts (e.g., job interviews, performance reviews), research has explored the specific impact of algorithmic evaluations in the workplace. In particular, the extant body of work focuses on the possibility that employees may perceive biases from algorithmic evaluations. We show that although perceptions of biases are indeed a notable outcome of AI-driven assessments (vs. those performed by humans), a crucial risk inherent in algorithmic evaluations is that individuals perceive them as lacking respect and dignity. Specifically, we find that the effect of algorithmic (vs. human) evaluations on perceptions of disrespectful treatment (a) remains significant while controlling for perceived biases (but not vice versa), (b) is significant even when the effect on perceived biases is not, and (c) is larger in size than the effect on perceived biases. The effect of algorithmic evaluations on disrespectful treatment is explained by perceptions that individuals’ detailed characteristics are not properly considered during the evaluation process conducted by AI.

Understanding Reasons for Participation and Barriers Within Adaptive Sports for Individuals with Physical Disabilities

The importance of participating in physical activity is widely advocated to reduce diseases, especially for individuals with physical disabilities. Adaptive sports have shown a multitude of benefits for those with physical disabilities, but few researchers have determined the benefits of adaptive sports from the perspective of the athletes. The purpose of this research study was to explore (1) reasons that individuals with physical disabilities engage in adaptive sports and (2) why individuals with physical disabilities do not participate in adaptive sports. Using an ethnographic qualitative retrospective design, 104 participant survey and phone interview responses were analyzed. Four themes emerged for reasons for adaptive sports participation including three subthemes, and five themes for barriers to adaptive sports participation. Applications for practice will be discussed for practitioners working with individuals who engage in adaptive sports will be identified.

Adults report positive perceptions of ground rule instructions in mock investigative interviews

Ground rules establish the conversational expectations during an interview and are intended to reduce interviewee discomfort and increase response accuracy towards problematic interview questions. This study explored perceptions of ground rule instructions in adult interviews. Younger (18–40 years) and older (60+ years) adults (N = 168) were interviewed about a film depicting an implied sexual assault or a personal event. Participants received either three ground rules as statements (‘Don’t Know’, ‘Don’t Understand’ and ‘Correct Me’) or the three statements with practice questions. Participants were interviewed about their perceptions of ground rules. Overall, ground rules were perceived as useful (85%) and as having a positive impact on interviewees’ emotional state (55%) and perceptions of the interviewer (35%). Perceptions did not vary based on contextual factors, but female and younger adults endorsed ground rules as useful more often than other groups. The results suggest that ground rules may improve adults’ experience of being interviewed.

Long COVID in the UAE: symptomatology, gender gaps, and health implications among COVID-19 survivors

Abstract Background A growing number of COVID-19 survivors are experiencing symptoms post-SARS-CoV-2 infection, known as long COVID. It is a new multisystem condition and understanding its associated factors and its impact on individuals is crucial. This study aims to characterize long COVID in previously hospitalized patients in the UAE, identifying associated factors and assessing its impact on patients’ daily lives. Methods A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted in hospitals in Dubai and Sharjah from January 29, 2020 to October 14, 2021, involving RT-PCR confirmed cases. Clinical, epidemiologic, and long COVID data were collected via hospital records and phone interviews. Results Long COVID affected 48.7% of 533 patients, with 46.6% prevalence persisting over a year. A total of 43 symptoms across 11 organ systems were reported. Females had 1.83 times higher odds of long COVID (95% CI [1.22, 2.74], p = 0.003). Each additional initial symptom (AOR = 1.22, 95% CI [1.05, 1.40], p = 0.008), ICU admission (AOR = 1.77, 95% CI [1.06, 2.98], p = 0.030), and ≥ 2 comorbidities (AOR = 2.19, 95% CI [1.09, 4.40], p = 0.027) increased the odds of long COVID. Long COVID significantly impacted daily life, with poorer health ratings (AOR = 5.576, 95% CI [3.029, 10.265], p &amp;lt; .001), worse health status (AOR = 7.842, 95% CI [4.954, 12.415], p &amp;lt; .001), and work limitations due to physical (AOR = 4.808, 95% CI [3.229, 7.158], p &amp;lt; .001) and emotional issues (AOR = 3.149, 95% CI [2.01, 4.933], p &amp;lt; .001). This impact persisted beyond 12 months post-infection. Conclusions Long COVID presents prolonged multisystem involvement and substantial disability among survivors, necessitating further research to understand its lasting effects and intervention development to mitigate its impact Key messages • Long COVID poses a substantial challenge to public health in the UAE, affecting almost half of hospitalized survivors and extending its impact beyond 12 months post-infection. • Risk factors like gender initial symptoms, ICU stay, and comorbidities increase the risk of long COVID, warranting the need for tailored interventions and support strategies for vulnerable populations.

Emphasizing the Communal Demands of a Leader Role Makes Job Interviews Less Stressful for Women But Not More Successful

AbstractThe cultural construal of leadership as masculine impedes women’s attainment of leader roles. This research examined whether adding feminine demands to a leader role relieved the greater stress experienced by women than men in a job interview for a leadership position and considered the processes that mediated women’s less favourable interview outcomes. In a hiring simulation, management students (N = 209; 112 women, 97 men) interviewed for a leader role framed by either stereotypically feminine or masculine role requirements. As shown by the stress biomarker salivary cortisol, the feminine role framing alleviated women’s, but not men’s, physiological stress response during the interview. However, under both masculine and feminine role framing, women, compared with men, reported lesser fit, expected poorer interview performance, appraised greater threat relative to challenge, and evaluated their performance less favourably, as did external raters. An additional vignette study (N = 305; 189 women, 111 men, 5 diverse) found that the feminine role framing increased the leader role’s communal demands but still conveyed strong agentic demands not different from those of the masculine role. In conclusion, although a feminine role framing alleviated women’s physiological stress response, it did not change their less favourable outcomes, as indicated by participants’ self-reports and others’ reports.