Interventions In Daily Practice Research Articles

A LASSO-derived prediction model for assessing the risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 and T2 epithelial ovarian cancer: an international retrospective cohort study.

The necessity of lymphadenectomy remains controversial in patients with early ovarian cancer. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with apparent local epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to develop a risk model for the prediction of LNM in local EOC with machine learning algorithms. A cohort of 4110 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy with apparent local EOC were retrospectively evaluated. In the model development, a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-derived Cox regression with internal 10-fold cross-validation was used to identify the risk factors of LNM. Clinical performance was assessed using the decision curve analysis, and a nomogram-based analysis was used to identify the risk factors for LNM. The incidence rate of LNM was rare in our cohort, at 7.4% (213/2885) in the primary set and 4.8% (59/1225) in the validation set. After feature selection, 10-fold internal validation, and external validation, our risk model performed well in both the discrimination (area under the curve=0.790 in the primary set and area under the curve=0.752 in the validation set) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests (P=0.873 in the primary set and P=0.380 in the validation set). Additionally, decision curve analysis demonstrated the superiority of our model for clinical interventions in daily practice. LNM is rare in patients with local EOC. In our study, which is based on machine learning algorithms, we developed a prediction model to identify patients with local EOC who could benefit from lymphadenectomy.

Safety of sheathless vascular access using braided 4 F selective catheters for common body interventions – a retrospective study

BackgroundBesides other factors, complication rate of transarterial interventions depends on the size of the vascular access. Therefore, the vascular access is mostly chosen as small as possible while still allowing all planned parts of the intervention.This retrospective analysis is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of sheathless arterial interventions for a broad spectrum of interventions in daily practice.MethodsAll sheathless interventions using a 4 F main catheter between May 2018 and September 2021 were included in the evaluation. Additionally, intervention parameters such as type of catheter, use of microcatheter and required change of main catheters were assessed. Information about the use about sheathless approach and catheters were obtained from the material registration system. All catheters were braided.Results503 sheathless interventions with 4 F catheters from the groin were documented. The spectrum comprised bleeding embolization, diagnostic angiographies, arterial DOTA-TATE-therapy, uterine fibroid embolization, transarterial chemotherapy, transarterial radioembolization and others. In 31 cases (6 %) a change of the main catheter was required. In 381 cases (76 %) a microcatheter was utilized. No clinically relevant adverse events were observed (grade 2 or higher [CIRSE AE-classification]). None of the cases later required conversion to a sheath-based intervention.ConclusionsSheathless interventions with a 4 F braided catheter from the groin are safe and feasible. It allows for a broad spectrum of interventions in daily practice.

Acceptance Factors for In-Hospital Pharmacist Interventions in Daily Practice: A Retrospective Study

Introduction: Performing pharmacist interventions (PIs) during the medication review helps to improve the quality of care. The acceptance by the physician of these PIs is a good indicator of the quality of this clinical pharmacy activity. The objective of this study was to determine, in the Amiens-Picardie teaching hospital (France), factors of acceptance in a variable environment of activity (central pharmacy, in the care units, computer assisted). Methods: All PIs transcribed by pharmacists on the Act-IP© site between November 2018 and April 2019 were analyzed using a complementary search in patient records. The environment, type, and clinical impact on patient health of each PI was collected. Linear mixed-effects models with a random pharmacist intercept were used to investigate the relationship between PI modalities and their chance of being accepted. Results: A total of 3,100 PIs were traced, of which 2,930 had been followed over time. Of these, 2,930 PIs, 1,504 (51.3%) were performed by a postgraduate pharmacist and 1,426 (48.7%) by a pharmacy resident, 1,623 (55.4%) were performed by verbal exchange, 455 (15.5%) by telephone, 846 (28.9%) by computer software, and 6 (0.2%) by paper. The clinical impact on patient health was major for 976 PIs (33.3%) and vital for 26 PIs (0.9%). According to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification (ATC), they were mainly related to anti-infectives (30.3%), the nervous system (18.7%), and blood and blood-forming organs (17.3%). In total, 2,415 PIs (82.4%) were accepted. According to the multivariate model, a PI was more often accepted when it was transmitted orally rather than by software (+27.7%, 95% CI: +23.2 to +32.1%) and when it was transmitted to a medical resident rather than a postgraduate physician (+4.4%, 95% CI: 1.2–7.6%). In these cases, there was a major rather than a moderate clinical impact on patient health (+4.3%, 95% CI: +1.1–+7.6%). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of the quality of the exchange with the prescriber and the prioritization of high-risk interventions as key points of medication review to improve rate of pharmacist interventions accepted by physician.

Spiritual care in Slovenian nursing homes: a quantitative descriptive study

Introduction:Spiritual care is an important component of holistic care in nursing. However, health care workers are not unanimous in who is responsible for the spiritual care of patients. It is likely that nurses are best suited to provide spiritual care because of the nature of their work, which requires constant contact with patients. Yet, meeting spiritual needs is not well defined in the role of nurses and is not always taught comprehensively in formal nursing education programmes. The aim of this study was to explore the extent to which nurses working in social care settings implement interventions related to spiritual care in their daily practise, how they perceive their knowledge of spiritual care, and the extent to which this dimension of care was included in their nursing education programmes.Methods:A non-experimental quantitative descriptive research study was used. In April 2020, 214 nurse assistants and registered nurses from 12 nursing homes in Slovenia participated in the study. The questionnaire used in the study included 12 statements related to 3 main areas: i) knowledge of the concepts of spirituality and religion, ii) implementation of spiritual/religious interventions in daily practice, iii) spirituality in nursing education. The individual statements were rated by the respondents on a 5-point Likert scale (1 - strongly disagree to 5 - strongly agree). The questionnaire had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.857). Data were described using calculated means, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation coefficient. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.Results:Regular spiritual assessment of nursing home residents is rarely performed by nurses (x̄=2.73, s=1.03). Female nurses (U=2191.500, p=0.008) and nurses who described themselves as religious (U=3314.000, p=0.001) implement spiritual/religious interventions in daily practice to a greater extent; they also expressed higher knowledge of the concepts of spirituality and religion compared to the others (religious/non-religious: U=2920.000, p=0.000; female/male: U=1885.000, p=0.000). The implementation of spiritual/religious interventions in daily practice correlated positively and statistically significantly mainly with self-perceived knowledge of the concepts of spirituality and religion (r=0.495, p=0.000) and the extent to which the content of spiritual care was represented in their nursing education program (r=0.494, p=0.000). However, nurses emphasized that the concept of spirituality and spiritual care tended to be poorly represented in formal nursing education programs (x̄=2.76, s=0.89).Discussion and conclusions:Individual characteristics, particularly self-reported religiosity and gender, appear to have an important influence on the implementation of spiritual/religious interventions in daily practise. In addition, our study suggests that the level of knowledge about the concepts of spirituality and religion influences nurses' willingness to implement spiritual care with their residents. Therefore, nursing educators need to develop curricula that include strategies to increase trainees' awareness of spiritual care. Current international research efforts on perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care in nursing offer important contributions to understanding the role of nursing in relation to spirituality and to developing educational content and approaches for both undergraduate and lifelong learning in nursing.

Developing an effective strategy to implement non‐pharmaceutical interventions amongst residents with dementia in residential care facilities: Caregivers’ perspectives

AbstractBackgroundNon‐pharmaceutical interventions based on unfulfilled needs amongst residents with dementia reduce symptoms of agitation, aggression and depression. However, to implement these interventions in daily practice in residential care facilities, caregivers need to (a) analyse resident’s behaviour, (b) recognize unfulfilled needs and (c) apply an individualized non‐pharmaceutical intervention.ObjectivesTo develop an effective strategy for the implementation of such complex approach, insights in caregivers’ perception of barriers and facilitating factors are needed.MethodsA total of thirteen focus group interviews with fifty‐six caregivers from twelve residential care facilities was conducted between October 2019 and February 2020.ResultsDespite a person‐centred vision and culture in residential care facilities, caregivers recognize that dealing with altered behaviour amongst residents with dementia is challenging and that non‐pharmaceutical interventions are seldom used. However caregivers are willing to invest in a team‐based person‐centred approach, different perspectives on priorities in care processes seem to influence the implementation. Participants refer to the importance of an open team culture where safety is guaranteed. An open culture stimulates an attitude of reflection, which is necessary to attune person‐centred care to different perspectives. Therefore the presence of clinical and facilitating leadership is crucial to ensure motivation, a sense of competency, communication, problem‐solving competences, practical organization of non‐pharmaceutical interventions and continuity in care processes. Ward managers and clinical leaders prefer to be supported by an implementation coach who provides education and training to the team members and who facilitates from a neutral perspective moments of intervision on a regular base.ConclusionsCaregivers recognize the presence of a person‐centred vision and culture, team willingness and different perspectives on priorities in care processes as influencing factors for the implementation of non‐pharmaceutical interventions. Strong clinical and facilitating leadership and the availability of an implementation coach may support caregivers in dealing with different perspectives on priorities in care. Implications for clinical practice: An educational package, intervision sessions and a leadership trajectory are recommended elements of strategy to implement non‐pharmaceutical interventions based on unfulfilled needs amongst residents with dementia.

Successful implementation of ehealth interventions in healthcare: Development of an ehealth implementation guideline.

eHealth interventions have the potential to improve the quality of healthcare and reduce costs. However, to implement eHealth interventions successfully instruments are needed to facilitate this process. This study aims to develop an eHealth implementation guideline for implementation of eHealth interventions in daily practice. In June and July 2019 a literature research was conducted and, subsequently, a two-round Delphi study including 13 international eHealth experts in the field of healthcare, ICT & technology, and research was performed. Within the Delphi study, experts scored specific determinants using an online survey. Based on mean scores and interquartile ranges (IQRs) in the online survey, consensus between the experts was assessed. A total of five domains (i.e., Technology, Acceptance, Financing, Organizational, and Legislation & Policy) with 24 corresponding determinants were assessed by the experts. After the second Delphi round, consensus was achieved on the five domains and 23 determinants (mean scores ≥ 8; IQR ≤ 2). Only for the determinant 'Evidence-Based Medicine' was no consensus reached (mean score < 8; IQR = 2). Based on the 23 determinants, the eHealth implementation guideline is developed for eHealth implementations in healthcare in order to increase their effectiveness. The eHealth implementation guideline developed in this study may help healthcare providers/researchers assess the determinants of successful eHealth intervention prior to the implementation of the eHealth program.

Background and evaluation design of a community-based health-promoting school intervention: Fit Lifestyle at School and at Home (FLASH)

BackgroundA community-based approach can be a promising strategy for implementing school-based health promotion aimed at stimulating healthy physical activity and dietary behaviour. Such an approach builds on the community capacity of multiple stakeholders, empowering them to design and implement tailored activities, supported by the whole school community. This paper describes the background and evaluation design of the community-based school intervention ‘Fit Lifestyle at School and at Home’ (FLASH) in four prevocational schools. FLASH includes four strategies for building the community capacity of students, school personnel and parents: 1) identifying leaders in each stakeholder group, 2) stimulating a school culture of participation, 3) having stakeholders design and implement tailored activities and 4) creating a network of local partners for structural embedding. The objective is to monitor the capacity-building processes of the FLASH intervention and to explore if these processes contribute to changes in community capacity. In addition, we will explore if the FLASH intervention is related to changes in PA, dietary behaviours and BMI of students.MethodsThis study has a mixed methods design and uses a participatory action-oriented approach to monitor and evaluate changes in community capacity, tailored health-promotion activities and implementation processes. Methods include semi-structured interviews, focus groups, journals, document analysis and observational scans of the physical environment. In addition, changes in BMI, physical activity and dietary behaviours of prevocational students will be explored by comparing the four intervention schools to four control schools. Data are collected by questionnaires and anthropometric measurements.DiscussionThe main strength of this study is its use of mixed methods to evaluate real-life processes of creating a healthy-school community. This will provide valuable information on capacity-building strategies for the structural embedding of health-promotion activities within school settings. The results could help schools become more empowered to adapt and adopt integral health-promotion interventions in daily practice that suit the needs of their communities, that are expected to be sustainable and that could lead to favourable changes in the PA and dietary behaviour of students.Trial registrationISRCTN67201841; date registered: 09-05-2019, retrospectively registered.

Electroencephalographic Patterns During Common Nursing Interventions in Neurointensive Care: A Descriptive Pilot Study

Many patients with neurological insults requiring neurointensive care have an increased risk of acute symptomatic seizures. Various nursing interventions performed when caring for these patients may elicit pathological cerebral electrical activity including seizures and stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs). The aim was to explore changes in electroencephalogram (EEG) due to neurointensive care nursing interventions. A convenience sample was recruited between November 2015 and April 2016, consisting of 12 adult patients with impaired consciousness due to a neurosurgical condition. Continuous EEG and simultaneous video recordings of nursing interventions were collected 48 continuous hours for each patient. Two analysts categorized the video recordings for common nursing interventions, and a neurophysiologist analyzed the EEGs. In total, 976 nursing interventions were observed. Epileptiform activity was observed in 4 patients (33%), during 1 nursing intervention episode each (0.4%). The 4 observed episodes of epileptiform activity occurred during multiple simultaneous nursing interventions (n = 3) and hygienic interventions (n = 1). Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges were observed in 1 patient (8%), in 1 single nursing intervention (0.1%). The observed SIRPIDs occurred during repositioning of the patient. All patients had muscle artifacts, during 353 nursing interventions (36.3%). The duration of nursing interventions was longer for those with simultaneous muscle artifacts (median, 116 seconds) than those without muscle artifacts, epileptiform activity, or SIRPIDs (median, 89.0 seconds). With regard to epileptiform activity and SIRPIDs, the median durations of the nursing interventions were 1158 and 289 seconds, respectively. The results of this pilot study indicate that muscle artifacts seem prevalent during nursing interventions and may be a sign of stress. Nurses should be aware of the risk of inducing stress by performing regular nursing interventions in daily practice, consider shorter or fewer interventions at a time in sensitive patients, and administer sedation accordingly. Considering that this was a pilot study, more research that investigates correlations between EEG patterns and nursing interventions in larger samples is needed.

INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY IN DEMENTIA CARE: ACCEPTANCE AMONG PROFESSIONAL CAREGIVERS

AbstractWhen it comes to dealing with symptoms associated with dementia, a number of studies have established the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions. However, in view of limited financial and human resources, implementing effective interventions in daily practice can be a major challenge for care providers. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for supporting psychosocial interventions in nursing home settings. ICTs are cost-effective and widely available, and using them could potentially ease the burden of dementia care delivery. Therefore, in order to assess acceptance and attitudes of professional caregivers regarding ICTs in dementia care, a sample of N = 205 professional caregivers (M = 38,81 yrs; 70% female) from 10 residential care facilities located in Berlin completed a standardized questionnaire (TA-EG) on factors associated with technology use and acceptance. Additionally, 11 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Results showed that older and female caregivers, respectively, reported less Competence (z = -4.21, p < .01 and z = -4.44, p < .01, resp.) and Enthusiasm (z = -2.38, p < .05 and z = -4.01, p < .01, resp.) regarding the use of technology in their work environment. Furthermore, qualitative content analysis of the interview transcripts revealed both factors promoting the use of ICTs in residential dementia care, and potential barriers. Important recommendations for the development of ICT-based interventions in dementia care will be reported and general implications for their design and successful adoption will be discussed.

Demonstrating the clinical pharmacist's activity: validation of an intervention oriented classification system.

Clinical pharmacists are increasingly involved in detecting and solving drug-related problems. To document their performance, a convenient tool to code pharmaceutical interventions in daily practice is desirable. The Swiss Society of Public Health Administration and Hospital Pharmacists (GSASA) proposed to implement a new classification system for pharmaceutical interventions. To develop and validate a classification system for pharmaceutical interventions and to compare it with the well-established Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) system. Rehabilitation clinic, geriatric and orthopaedic wards of a 427-bed teaching hospital. Development of the GSASA classification started with expert panel discussions and the validation of the first version (GSASA V1). To assess appropriateness, interpretability, and validity, clinical pharmacists documented during a 6-week period all interventions using GSASA V1 and PCNE version 6.2 (V6.2). Acceptability and feasibility were tested by an 8-item questionnaire with 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree), and inter-rater reliability (Fleiss-Kappa coefficients κ) was determined. After revision, the second version (V2) was assessed again for reliability. User's agreement/satisfaction, comprehensiveness/reliability of the classification system. The GSASA V1 includes 4 categories and 35 subcategories. Of 115 interventions classified with GSASA V1, 93 (80.9 %) could be completely classified in all categories. This explains that 3 of 6 users could be not satisfied with the comprehensiveness of GSASA V1 (mean user agreement 2.7 ± 0.8). The questionnaire showed that all users could find GSASA V1 (4.0 ± 0.0) easier to use than PCNE V6.2 (3.0 ± 0.9). Users were generally satisfied with the GSASA V1 (3.5 ± 0.8), especially with the adequate time expenditure (4.0 ± 0.7). Inter-rater reliability and acceptability of GSASA V1 were comparable to those of the PCNE V6.2. The agreement among the GSASA V1 users was substantial for the categories 'problem' (κ = 0.66), 'intervention' (κ = 0.74), and 'outcome' (κ = 0.63), while moderate agreement for the category 'cause' was obtained (κ = 0.53). The final system GSASA V2 includes 5 categories (addition of 'type of problem') and 41 subcategories. Total inter-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.52). The GSASA classification system appeared to be reliable and promising for documentation of pharmaceutical interventions in daily practice (practical and less time-consuming). The system is validated in terms of appropriateness, interpretability, validity, acceptability, feasibility, and reliability.

Development and validation of a generic questionnaire for the implementation of complex medical interventions.

Introduction: The implementation of complex medical interventions in daily practice is often fraught with difficulties. According to the iterative phase model proposed by the British Medical Research Council (MRC), the development, implementation and evaluation of complex interventions should be theory-driven. A conceptual model that seems to be a promising framework is the Theory of planned behaviour (TPB). In our study we aimed to develop and validate a generic and multifaceted questionnaire based on the TPB to detect physicians’ willingness to implement complex medical interventions and the factors influencing this willingness.Methods: The questionnaire was developed according to the literature and was informed by previous qualitative research of our department. It was validated on the example of an electronic library of decision aids, arriba-lib. The sample consisted of 181 General Practitioners (GPs) who received a training regarding arriba-lib and subsequently filled in the questionnaire, assessing the TPB variables attitude, subjective norm, perceived behaviour control and intention. Follow-up assessments were conducted after two (assessing retest reliability) and eight weeks (assessing target behaviour). We performed a confirmatory factor analysis investigating the factorial structure of our questionnaire according to the TPB. Beside the calculation of the questionnaire’s psychometric properties we conducted a structural equation model and an ordinal regression to predict actual behaviour regarding the installation and application of arriba-lib.Results: The postulated three factorial model (attitude, subjective norm, perceived behaviour control) of our questionnaire based on the TPB was rejected. A two factorial model with a combined factor subjective norm/perceived behaviour control was accepted. The explained variance in the ordinal regression was low (Nagelkerke’s R2=.12). Neither attitude nor intention were able to predict the use or non-use of arriba-lib (attitude: p=.68, intention: p=.44). For the combined factor subjective norm/perceived behaviour control a significant, but small effect (p=.03) was shown. Conclusions: The TPB is not an adequate theoretical framework to guide the development of a generic questionnaire in the context of the implementation of complex interventions. To enable the successful implementation of complex medical interventions evaluators have to go through the whole development and evaluation process according to the MRC-model, without short cuts. Further, it has to be discussed if a generic instrument can be valid and useful. Regarding the TPB a publication bias regarding the theory’s applicability might have to be considered.

Left Radial versus Right Radial Approach for Coronary Artery Catheterization: A Prospective Comparison

Despite several advantages of the transradial over the transfemoral approach, the use of transradial access for coronary interventions in daily practice is still low. Major limitations are the technical and anatomical issues related with right radial artery access. The left radial approach may have an advantage from the point of view of the vascular anatomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of routinely using the left radial compared to the right radial approach. This is a prospective single center study comparing left radial to right radial access for coronary artery catheterization. The overall in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), procedural success rate, bleeding, vascular and procedural complications, fluoroscopy time, number of catheters, and amount of contrast agent used were assessed. A total of 1,032 coronary angiograms were performed: 420 were performed using the right radial artery and 612 the left radial artery. No differences were observed in MACCE and success rate between the two groups. No cases of major or minor bleeding and vascular complications requiring surgical intervention were reported. Fluoroscopy time and the number of catheters used were significantly less in the left radial group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively), while the volume of contrast was similar (P = 0.264). The left radial approach in our series was demonstrated to be safe and feasible in daily practice, and in this study was associated with a reduction in fluoroscopy time and number of catheters used.

Implementation of complementary interventions in the Netherlands: Experiences of pioneers

ObjectiveAlthough many Dutch patients desire integration of complementary interventions in conventional healthcare, implementation is in its infancy in the Netherlands. The objective of this study was to describe the implementation process of complementary interventions in Dutch healthcare organizations. MethodsData in this qualitative study were collected in two steps: by questionnaires and by interviews. In five organizations the project leader and a professional who provides the interventions participated in the study. ResultsMain facilitators for implementation are: enthusiasm and support of colleagues; appreciation of patients; effectiveness of the interventions; positive publications in media; possibility to link the project to objectives of the organization; and accessibility of the interventions. Main barriers for implementation are: ignorance and skepticism of professionals; lack of research; lack of budget; lack of integration of the interventions in daily practice. Participants developed strategies to overcome barriers and to exploit facilitators. ConclusionProfessionals play a leading role in the implementation of complementary interventions in Dutch healthcare organizations. They use several methods to deal with facilitators and barriers. Practice implicationsOrganizations and professionals that aim to implement complementary interventions in their service may learn from experiences of pioneer organizations.

Effectiveness of Interventions of Specific Complaints of the Arm, Neck, or Shoulder (CANS)

The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of (conservative and surgical) interventions for the 4 specific pain disorders of the hand: trigger finger, primary Raynaud's phenomenon, Dupuytren disease, and De Quervain's disease. This information can help clinicians in the selection of interventions in daily practice, and may give direction to future research. Relevant review publications and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in PubMed were searched. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed. To summarize the results of the included reviews and RCTs, a best-evidence synthesis was used. For primary Raynaud's phenomenon (1 review, 20 RCTs), we found strong evidence for calcium channel blockers and moderate evidence for laser therapy. Limited evidence was found for Ketanserin, Prozasin, Buflomedil, transdermal glyceryl trinitrate patches, Ginkgo biloba, and behavioral treatment with temperature feedback. Other interventions did not show clear favorable treatment effects. For Trigger finger one very small RCT was found that showed limited evidence for steroid injection. For Dupuytren disease (4 RCTs) limited evidence was found in favor of use of staples versus sutures in the Dupuytren's surgery, and for intermittent compression on the postoperative hand after surgery. For other interventions no clear positive effects could be demonstrated. For De Quervain's disease (2 RCTs), we found no efficacy of Nimesulide as addition to a Triamcinolone injection, and no clear differences between a corticosteroid injection and a splint in pregnant patients or patients breast-feeding. Well-designed and well-conducted RCTs are clearly needed in this field.

Interventions for improving older patients' involvement in primary care episodes

There is a growing expectation among patients that they should be involved in the delivery of medical care. Accumulating evidence from empirical studies shows that patients of average age who are encouraged to participate more actively in treatment decisions have more favourable health outcomes, in terms of both physiological and functional status, than those who do not. Interventions to encourage more active participation may be focused on different stages, including: the use of health care; preparation for contact with a care provider; contact with the care provider; or feedback about care. However, it is unclear whether the benefits of these interventions apply to the elderly as well. To assess the effects of interventions in primary medical care that improve the involvement of older patients (>=65 years) in their health care. We searched: the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group Specialised Register (May 2003); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2004; MEDLINE (Ovid) (1966 to June 2004); EMBASE (1988 to June 2004); PsycINFO (1872 to June 2004); DARE, The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2004; ERIC (1966 to June 2004); CINAHL (1982 to June 2004); Sociological Abstracts (1963 to June 2004); Dissertation Abstracts International (1861 to June 2004); and reference lists of articles. Randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised trials of interventions to improve the involvement of older patients (>= 65 years) in single consultations or episodes of primary medical care. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Results are presented narratively as meta-analysis was not possible. We identified three studies involving 433 patients. Overall, the quality of studies was not high, and there was moderate to high risk of bias. Interventions of a pre-visit booklet and a pre-visit session (either combined or pre-visit session alone) led to more questioning behaviour and more self-reported active behaviour in the intervention group (3 studies). One study (booklet and pre-visit session) showed no difference in consultation length and time engaged in talk between the intervention and control groups. The booklet and pre-visit session in one study was associated with more satisfaction with interpersonal aspects of care for the intervention group although no difference in overall satisfaction between intervention and control. There was no long-term follow up to see if effects were sustained. No studies measured outcomes relating to the use of health care, health status and wellbeing, or health behaviour. Overall this review shows some positive effects of specific methods to improve the involvement of older people in primary care episodes. Because the evidence is limited, however, we can not recommend the use of the reviewed interventions in daily practice. There should be a balance between respecting patients' autonomy and stimulating their active participation in health care. Face-to-face coaching sessions, whether or not complemented with written materials, may be the way forward. As this is impractical for the whole population, it could be worthwhile to identify a subgroup of older patients who might benefit the most from enhanced involvement, ie. those who want to be involved, but lack the necessary skills. This group could be coached either individually or, more practically, in group sessions.

Pain in children with cancer: knowledge and attitudes of Dutch paediatric nurses

Children with cancer frequently experience pain as a result of the disease or its treatment. The assessment of pain in children is a multifaceted process. Their response to pain is both behavioural and physiological. In addition, the changing developmental levels of children complicate the assessment process. Paediatric care providers must use their knowledge of a child's cognitive abilities, developmental level and the nature of childhood pain to accurately assess an individual child's pain. Paediatric oncology nurses play an important role in the assessment and management of pain. Literature suggests that pain in children is often poorly assessed and undertreated due to a lack of knowledge and misconceptions. The purpose of this study is to explore the current knowledge and attitudes of paediatric nurses regarding pain in children with cancer in The Netherlands. Questionnaires were sent to 252 nurses in 7 hospitals. The questionnaire included demographic questions, and questions or nurses' knowledge of pain, attitudes towards childrens' reports of pain, nurses' perception of the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain-relief interventions and pain-relief interventions they use. A total of 174 (69%) nurses responded. Findings indicate that the majority of the nurses have a sufficient knowledge base regarding pain in children. However, a distressing factor is that their knowledge of the effectiveness of pain-relief interventions does not reflect the interventions they use. Although nurses may know that a specific intervention is effective, they fail to put it into practice. Demographic factors, like age, education or work experience had no influence on the nurses' knowledge or application of their interventions. Further studies need to examine the cause of the discrepancy between knowledge and practical application of pain-relief interventions. It is vital that paediatric oncology nurses should not only be educated in knowledge of pain and pain interventions, but should also be stimulated to use these interventions in daily practice. Only then will this ensure that adequate pain control in children with cancer is achieved.