Interruption Of Oral Anticoagulation Research Articles

Management of edoxaban therapy in patients undergoing emergency/urgent procedures: a subanalysis of the global, prospective, observational, multinational EMIT-AF/VTE programme

Abstract Background Physicians are often unable to follow recommendations for preprocedural oral anticoagulant interruption before emergency/urgent (unplanned) procedures, which may lead to a higher incidence of adverse outcomes in these patients compared with those who undergo planned procedures. The Global EMIT-AF/VTE programme found low bleeding and thromboembolic event rates for patients receiving edoxaban who underwent diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. However, edoxaban management and clinical outcomes may differ among the subgroup of patients with emergency/urgent procedures. Purpose To describe periprocedural edoxaban management and clinical outcomes for patients in the EMIT-AF/VTE programme who underwent emergency/urgent procedures. Methods In this subanalysis, only physician-reported unplanned (emergency/urgent) procedures were included, of which dental and dermatological procedures were excluded. Only a patient’s first emergency procedure was included, with the exception of 3 patients having 2 procedures on the same day (in these cases the 2 procedures were combined). Procedure bleeding risk was classified according to EHRA criteria, and baseline characteristics and edoxaban interruption data were collected. Clinical event and procedure dates were compared to determine whether they were related. Results Among 156 patients undergoing emergency/urgent procedures, the mean ± standard deviation age at baseline was 74.5 ± 8.7 years, and the CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.8 ± 1.6. Medical histories of hypertension and dyslipidaemia were reported in 84.0% and 40.4% of patients, respectively; approximately one-quarter of patients had diabetes mellitus (26.9%) or creatinine clearance ≤50 mL/min (24.4%). The most common procedure types were vascular access and transcatheter diagnostics/interventions (34.6%) and gastroenterological procedures (27.6%). Procedures were more often EHRA-classified as minor (35.9%) or low (35.3%) vs high risk (20.5%). Preprocedure edoxaban interruption rates ranged from 39.3%–50.9% across risk groups, with more than half of the procedures being performed with edoxaban interruption (53%–66%; Figure). By 20 days postprocedure, edoxaban therapy was resumed in approximately 86% and 88% of patients with minor- or low-risk procedures vs 70% with high-risk procedures. Overall, 33 clinical events were recorded, of which 18 (54.5%) preceded a procedure (Table). Five bleeding events and one thrombotic event occurred after and were caused by the procedure. Conclusions Edoxaban resumption was protracted after high- vs minor- or low-risk procedures. Bleeding and thrombotic events resulting from a procedure occurred in <4% of patients, indicating that postprocedure edoxaban therapy can be effectively tailored to optimise clinical outcomes.FigureTable

Periprocedural Anticoagulation Management of Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy with Polypectomy.

Introduction/Objective Colonoscopy with polypectomy is an integral component of colorectal cancer screening. There are limited data and consensus on periprocedural anticoagulation management, especially regarding bleeding risk with uninterrupted anticoagulation and thromboembolic risk with interruption. Our aim was to determine the incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic complications among colon screening participants undergoing colonoscopy following implementation of a novel patient care pathway for standardized periprocedural anticoagulation management. Methods We conducted a retrospective study including all participants (age 50-74) on an oral anticoagulant (e.g., vitamin K antagonists, direct oral anticoagulants) referred to the British Columbia Colon Screening Program for colonoscopy following abnormal fecal immunochemical test in a 6-month period (March-August 2022). Data relating to their specific periprocedural anticoagulant management and colonoscopy results including method of polypectomy were obtained. Primary outcomes were major bleeding and arterial or venous thromboembolic events from time of oral anticoagulant interruption until 14 days of postcolonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included nonmajor and minor bleeding, acute coronary syndrome, emergency room visit, hospital admission, and death due to any cause. Results Over the 6-month period, 162 participants completed standardized periprocedural anticoagulation management, colonoscopy ± polypectomy, and 14-day follow-up. One (0.6%) had a major bleeding event and one (0.6%) had an arterial thromboembolic event. Conclusions A novel patient care pathway for standardized periprocedural anticoagulation management with a multidisciplinary team is associated with low rates of major bleeding and thrombotic complications after colonoscopy with polypectomy.

Interruption of oral anticoagulants after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the importance of risk stratification.

Interruption of oral anticoagulants after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the importance of risk stratification.

Anticoagulant Management of Mechanical Heart Valve Patients During Perioperative Surgery: A Case Report

Background: Patients with mechanical heart valves require lifelong oral anticoagulation. It will be a dilemma if a patient with a mechanical heart valve has surgery. This case report aims to discuss how to interrupt oral anticoagulants and bridging therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves who will be undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Case Report: A 26-year-old pregnant woman, G1P0A0, aterm with a mechanical mitral valve, will have elective Sectio Caesarian Transperitonealis (SCTP) surgery and Intra Uterine Device (IUD) insertion. The patient had a history of mitral valve replacement surgery (MVR) in 2014 and was routinely treated with 4 mg of warfarin at night. From the examination, blood pressure was 120/80 mmHg, heart rate was 90 beats per minute, and pulse rate was 90 beats per minute. The ECG examination found sinus rhythm with 1st-degree atrioventricular block, right axis deviation, 90 beats per minute, and left atrial enlargement. We decided to have oral anticoagulant interruption and bridging therapy by stopping warfarin three days before surgery. When the international normalized ratio (INR) falls <2, patients are given heparin injections (UFH) with an APTT target of 1.5-2.0 times from basic APTT. When the patient was about to be operated on, UFH was stopped 6 hours before surgery and resumed 12 hours after surgery. Warfarin was given one day postoperatively. Patients were adjusted to the dose of UFH according to the target. This patient had no thromboembolic events or bleeding before, during, or after surgery. The patient was allowed to be an outpatient and was given home therapy with Warfarin 5 mg at night. Results: We report a case of a 26-year-old female patient with a mechanical mitral valve who was going to undergo elective SCTP surgery and an IUD insertion. Patients at high risk of thrombo¬embolism due to surgery with a high risk of bleeding. Bridging therapy was performed using UFH. In the perioperative period, the patient did not experience thromboembolic events, and bleeding before, during, and after surgery could be well controlled. Conclusion: Perioperative management of patients with mechanical heart valves must be done carefully. Interruption of oral anticoagulants should be carefully considered considering the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding during the perioperative period. Guidelines recommend that in patients with mechanical heart valves, anticoagulation interruption for minor surgeries is avoided. Whereas in patients with major surgery, it is necessary to do bridging therapy with fast-acting anticoagulants such as UFH or LMWH. Keywords: mechanical heart valve, anticoagulant interruption, perioperative, bridging therapy Correspondence: Trisulo Wasyanto. Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University / Dr. Moewardi Hospital. Jl. Kol. Sutarto 132, Surakarta 57126, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: trisulo.wasyanto@staff.uns.ac.id. ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9900-0497. Mobile: +62811294225.

Comparison of phenprocoumon with direct oral anticoagulants in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as effective and safe as the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin. Phenprocoumon has a different pharmacokinetic profile compared with warfarin and is the most used VKA in Germany. The aim of the study was to compare DOAC with phenprocoumon. In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, 1735 patients who underwent 2219 consecutive catheter ablations for AF between January 2011 and May 2017 were included. All patients were in-hospital for at least 48 h after catheter ablation. The primary outcome was defined as peri-procedural thrombo-embolic events. The secondary outcome was any bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). The mean age of the patients was 63.3 years. Phenprocoumon was prescribed in 929 (42%) of the cases, and in 697 (31%) dabigatran, 399 (18%) rivaroxaban, and 194 (9%) apixaban. During hospitalization, 37 (1.6%) thrombo-embolic events occurred, including 23 transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs). Compared with the use of phenoprocoumon, the use of DOAC was significantly associated with a lower thrombo-embolic risk [16 (1.2%) vs. 21 (2.2%), odds ratio (OR)], 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.9], P = 0.04. No statistically significant association with bleeding risk was observed [phenprocomoun: 122 (13%); DOAC: 163 (12.6%); OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2); P = 0.70]. Interruption of oral anticoagulation (OAC) was associated with an increased risk for thrombo-embolic complications [OR 2.2 (1.1-4.3); P = 0.031], and bleeding [OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.8-3.2), P = 0.001]. In patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF, the use of DOAC was associated with a reduced risk of thrombo-embolic events compared with phenprocoumon. Non-interrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy was associated with a reduced risk of peri-procedural thrombo-embolic and any bleeding complications.

P465 NON–VITAMIN K ANTAGONIST ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN PATIENTS WITH THALASSEMIA

Abstract Apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (NOACs) are drugs widely used and recommended for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter and to prevent or treat pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, very little is reported in literature regarding their use in patients with β–thalassemia, among which high incidence of AF is reported and where the balance between thromboembolic and bleeding risk is of paramount importance. In this study 18 patients with transfusion–dependent β–thalassemia were enrolled. Patients were treated with NOACs for throboembolic prevention due to history of AF or atrial flutter. Mean follow–up duration was 21 ± 15 months for each patient and no thromboembolic events were reported. Three patients had non–major bleeding events without oral anticoagulation interruption. Two patients reported dyspepsia during treatment with dabigatran and were shifted to a different NOAC with resolution of symptom. These data suggest efficacy and safety of NOACs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients affected by β–thalassemia.

Recurrent thromboembolism due to direct oral anticoagulation interruption postpericardial window for a hemopericardium.

We present a female patient with a history of systolic heart failure with an ejection fraction of 25-30%, and unprovoked pulmonary embolism on extended anticoagulation therapy with rivaroxaban who underwent a pericardial window for cardiac tamponade due to hemopericardium in the setting of direct oral anticoagulant(DOAC). The rivaroxaban was held following the pericardial window, and she experienced another episode of pulmonary embolism before the rivaroxaban could be restarted. Currently, there are no guidelines on when to restart anticoagulation postpericardial window for DOAC-associated hemopericardium. Studies are needed to help solve this dilemma.

Outcomes in patients undergoing periprocedural interruption of warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants

BackgroundDifferences in clinical outcomes following a temporary interruption of warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for a surgical procedure are not well described. Differences in patient characteristics from practice‐based cohorts have not typically been accounted for in prior analyses. AimTo describe risk‐adjusted differences in postoperative outcomes following an interruption of warfarin vs DOACs. MethodsPatients receiving care at six anticoagulation clinics participating in the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative were included if they had at least one oral anticoagulant interruption for a procedure. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline differences between the warfarin cohort and DOAC cohort. Bleeding and thromboembolic events within 30 days following the procedure were compared between the IPTW cohorts using the Poisson distribution test. ResultsA total of 525 DOAC patients were matched with 1323 warfarin patients, of which 923 were nonbridged warfarin patients and 400 were bridged warfarin patients. The occurrence of postoperative minor bleeding (10.8% vs. 4.7%, p < .001), major bleeding (2.9% vs. 1.1%, p = .01) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) (6.5% vs. 3.0%, p = .002) was greater in the DOAC cohort compared with the nonbridged warfarin cohort. The rates of postoperative bleeding outcomes were similar between the DOAC and the bridged warfarin cohorts. ConclusionPerioperative interruption of DOACs, compared with warfarin without bridging, is associated with a higher incidence of 30‐day minor bleeds, major bleeds, and CRNMBs. Further research investigating the perioperative outcomes of these two classes of anticoagulants is warranted.

Use of anticoagulant drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation. Does adherence to therapy have a prognostic impact?

Anticoagulant therapy represents a pivotal element that strongly influences the thromboembolic risk of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) subjects. The main purpose of this review was to identify issues and suggest strategies to improve the oral anticoagulants (OACs) treatment adherence, which is the most important predictor of NVAF outcome. Advantages, efficacy, and impact of these drugs on patients' prognosis were revealed in important clinical trials on large cohorts of patients and are often prescribed nowadays. A real-life data registry, the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the Field-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) analyzed the profile and outcome of patients diagnosed with NVAF receiving oral antithrombotic treatment. The observations gathered in the registry were crucial for identifying relevant elements that clinicians must improve, such as adherence strategies and predisposing factors that correlated with stroke. Adherence to OACs in AF patients is essential from the viewpoint of clinical efficacy and safety. Major adverse events and negative outcome are correlated with a weak anticoagulation control caused by an ineffective treatment adherence strategy. Solving the issue of oral anticoagulation adherence is possible using new technologies, but future directions should be explored. Mobile phone applications centered on patients' needs, telemedicine programs that evaluate patients' evolution and detect adverse reactions or events, encouraging an adequate management of the event without interruption of OACs, represent perspectives with a major impact on treatment adherence.

Abstract 6932: Safety of Left Atrial Appendage Closure on Uninterrupted Warfarin Therapy

Introduction: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) device for stroke prevention is a safe and effective alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The safety of performing LAAC on uninterrupted warfarin (UW) compared to interrupted warfarin (IW) is currently unknown. Hypothesis: Complication rates of performing LAAC on UW vs. IW will be similar. Methods: We reviewed the data from the second half of PROTECT-AF trial, PREVAIL trial, CAP and CAP2 registries. Patients were categorized to the UW group if INR on the day of the procedure was ≥2 and to the IW group if INR was &lt;2. Procedural complications within 7 days of LAAC were reviewed. An association between complications and AC strategy was analyzed. Results: Data from 1580 patients were reviewed and 294 patients (18.6%) received LAAC on UW. The UW group had a mean INR of 2.4±0.4 and IW group had a mean INR of 1.3±0.3. There were several differences in baseline characteristics: lower BMI in the UW group (28.6±5.3 vs 29.5±6.0, p=0.01), fewer patients with hypertension in the UW group (87.1% vs 91.1%, p=0.04), lower HAS-BLED score in the UW group (2.0±1.0 vs 2.1±1.0, p&lt;0.01), and more patients with persistent AF in the UW group (37.1% vs 26.4%, p&lt;0.01). Overall, there were no significant differences in total or individual complication rates between the two groups (UW 5.1% vs IW 6.1%, p=0.59). Although not statistically significant, lower event rates were noted in the UW group for the following: stroke (0% vs 0.3%, p&gt;0.99), pericardial effusion requiring intervention (1.7% vs 1.8%, p&gt;0.99), pseudoaneurysm (0% vs 0.4%, p=0.59), hematoma (0% vs 0.2%, p&gt;0.99), and device embolism (0% vs 0.2%, p=1.0). The UW group had statistically insignificant higher events rates of AV fistula (0.3% vs 0%, p=0.19) and major bleeding requiring transfusion (1% vs 0.5%, p=0.38). In addition, there was no significant difference in periprocedural ischemic stroke (0% vs 0.3%, p&gt;0.99). Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, no significant difference was observed in procedural complication rates when performing LAAC on UW vs. IW. These results suggest that LAAC can be safely performed without interruption of OAC.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in adult congenital heart disease: a single-center study

Abstract Introduction Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) are at an increased risk for thromboembolic events and atrial arrhythmias are common in this population. Non-vitamin K anatagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) prescription is increasing, however data on efficacy and safety in ACHD is unclear, particularly in patients (P) with complex CHD. The aim of the study was to review the use of NOACs in various types of ACHD and assess its safety and efficacy. Methods Evaluation of consecutive ACHD P started on NOAC therapy from 2014 to 2020. P were followed-up for bleeding or thromboembolic events and mortality. CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED scores were calculated and risk factors for bleeding were identified. Results 93 ACHD P were included, mean age 52±15 years, 58% female, 44% with complex CHD (3.2% with Fontan circulation), with diagnosis of: 22.2% atrial septal defect, 20% tetralogy of Fallot, 11.1% transposition of the great arteries, 10% Ebstein's anomaly, 8.9% ventricular septal defect, 7.8% pulmonary stenosis, 5.6% ductus arteriosus, 4.4% AV septal defect, 3.4% univentricular heart, 3.4% coarctation of aorta, 2.2% supra-aortic stenosis and 1% with Uhl disease. Most P were anticoagulated with rivaroxaban (43%), followed by edoxaban (24%), apixaban (20%), and dabigatran (13%). The indications for anticoagulation were: atrial arrhythmias (81%), pulmonary embolism (PE) (6.3%), atrial thrombi (4.3%), thromboprophylaxis in Fontan circulation (3.2%), deep vein thrombosis (3.2%) and stroke (2%). 66% of P had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 and 82% HASBLED score ≤2. In a mean follow-up of 41±21 months (400.4 patient-years), there were embolic events in 2P (1 splenic infarction and 1 PE) albeit both were in the context of oral anticoagulation interruption. The cardiovascular mortality was 2% and allcause mortality 5%, however with no relation to thrombosis or bleeding events. 6 P (6.5%) suffered a minor and 3 P (3.2%) suffered a major bleeding, a median time of 12 (IQR 15) months after starting NOAC therapy. The annual risk for bleeding was 2.2%/patient/year. P with bleeding events showed no significant difference regarding age (55±16 vs 52±15 years, p=0.587), gender (13% female vs 5.1% male, p=0.295) or CHD type (p=0.582). 8.6% of P required dose reduction, mostly for bleeding (3.2%) or renal impairment (2.2%). Renal disease was a strong risk factor for major bleeding (HR 14.6 [95% CI 1.23–73.6], p=0.033 and multivariate analysis showed that an increased HASBLED score was an independent predictor of minor (adjusted HR 3.44 [95% CI 1.13–10.52], p=0.030) and major (adjusted HR 5.29 [95% CI 1.14–24.45], p=0.033) bleeding complications. Conclusion Anticoagulation with NOACs is a safe and effective option for selected ACHD P, although bleeding complications were not negligible, particularly in P with renal disease. Larger scale research studies are required, especially regarding complex CHD such as P with Fontan circulation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Periprocedural management of anticoagulation therapy and in-hospital outcomes in patients with warfarin indication undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Data from the WAR-STENT registry

In patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) with warfarin, the management of OAC peri-procedure of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still not fully defined. To investigate clinical practice and outcomes associated with continuation vs interruption of OAC, with or without bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), we examined the database of the observational, prospective, multicenter Italian WAR-STENT registry. The WAR-STENT registry was conducted in 2008-2010 in 37 Italian centers and included 411 consecutive patients in 157 of whom the peri-procedural international normalized ratio (INR) value was available. In relation to the continuation vs interruption of OAC, patients were divided into group 1 (n = 106) and group 2 (n = 51) respectively, and compared. The basal characteristics of the two groups were similar. The most frequent indication for OAC was atrial fibrillation and for PCI acute coronary syndromes, respectively. The pre-procedural mean value of INR was significantly different in group 1 vs group 2 (2.3 ± 0.4 vs 1.5 ± 0.2; p <0.001), while the use of antithrombotic drugs did not differ, except for LMWH which, albeit limited to only 14% of cases, was used significantly more frequently in group 2 (14% vs 2%; p=0.006). The radial approach was used significantly more often in group 1 vs group 2 (72% vs 45%; p=0.002). The in-hospital incidence of major bleeding complications was similar in groups 1 and 2 (4% vs 8%; p=0.27), as well as the occurrence of major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, re-revascularization of the treated vessel, stent thrombosis, stroke and venous thromboembolism (6% vs 6%; p=0.95). There was a tendency towards a higher incidence of minor access-site bleeding complications in group 1 patients treated by the femoral route. In unselected patients with an indication for OAC with warfarin and undergoing PCI, the continuation vs interruption of OAC (essentially without LMWH bridging) strategies appears similar in terms of efficacy and safety. In consideration of the superior convenience, peri-procedural continuation of OAC should therefore generally be preferred, with the possible exception of patients in whom the femoral approach is required for the procedure.

Incidence of oral anticoagulant interruption among stroke patients with atrial fibrillation and subsequent stroke.

We analyzed the incidence and causes of oral anticoagulant (OAC) cessation and subsequent stroke after OAC withdrawal in a cohort of Korean stroke patients with atrial fibrillation. The Korean Atrial Fibrillation Evaluation Registry in Ischemic Stroke patients (K-ATTENTION) is a multicenter cohort study, merging stroke registries from 11 tertiary centers in Korea. The number of OAC interruption episodes and the reasons were reviewed from hospital records. Stroke after OAC withdrawal was defined when a patient experienced ischaemic stroke within 31days after OAC withdrawal. Clinical variables were compared between patients who experienced stroke recurrence during OAC interruption and those who did not experience recurrence. Among 3213 stroke patients with atrial fibrillation, a total of 329 episodes of OAC interruption were detected in 229 patients after index stroke (mean age 72.9±8.3years, 113 female patients). The most frequent reason for OAC withdrawal was poor compliance [103 episodes (31.3%)] followed by extracranial bleeding [96 episodes (29.2%)]. Stroke after OAC withdrawal was noted in 13 patients. Mean age, vascular risk factor profile and mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc score were not significantly different between patients with and without recurrent stroke. A considerable number of stroke patients with atrial fibrillation experienced temporary interruption of OAC after index stroke, which was associated with stroke recurrence of 4.0 cases per 100 interruption episodes.

Effect of oral anticoagulation on clinical outcomes and haemodynamic variables after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation

The effect of oral anticoagulation on clinical and haemodynamic outcomes following successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation is unclear. To evaluate the effect of oral anticoagulation within the first year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. All patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation in two French tertiary centres from 2010 to 2016 were included prospectively. The composite outcome of death, stroke, readmission for heart failure or major/life-threatening bleeding according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria within 1year was evaluated. Valvular haemodynamic deterioration was defined as mean transprosthetic gradient ≥20mmHg or an increase of ≥10mmHg during echocardiographic follow-up. Of the 1139 patients included, 400 (35.1%) were discharged on oral anticoagulation. The primary endpoint was more frequent in the group with versus without oral anticoagulation (29.4% vs. 17.3% 21.5%; hazard ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.42-2.35). Composite endpoint risk factors were chronic pulmonary and kidney diseases, previous atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% at discharge and no femoral vascular approach, but not oral anticoagulation prescription at discharge. Conversely, 58patients were identified with valvular haemodynamic deterioration, including 11 (19%) in the group with oral anticoagulation and 47 (81%) in the group without oral anticoagulation. Valvular haemodynamic deterioration risk factors were absence of oral anticoagulation exposure, increased body mass index, use of a balloon-expandable bioprosthesis and use of a bioprosthesis with diameter ≤23mm. Antithrombotic treatment crossover (i.e. oral anticoagulation interruption or introduction during follow-up) occurred in 9.6% of patients, and was a risk factor for death (adjusted hazard ratio 3.39, 95% confidence interval 1.63-7.07). Baseline characteristics, rather than oral anticoagulation prescription at discharge, were associated with adverse outcomes following successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Conversely, oral anticoagulation was associated with reduced valvular haemodynamic deterioration.

P344Does the presence of spontaneous echo contrast in TEE predict thromboembolic events during or after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation?

Abstract Introduction The detection of spontaneous echocontrast in the left atrium is often used as a surrogate parameter for a high cardioembolic risk. However, studies have shown that transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guided cardioversion does not decrease the risk of thromboembolic events in comparison to long-term effective oral anticoagulation. Data to better estimate the clinical relevance of SEC 3 on the risk of thromboembolic events in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are missing. Method The cohort consisted of 1199 patients (1360 ablation procedures) who underwent TEE according to physician discretion prior to catheter ablation of paroxysmal (67%) or persistent (33%) atrial fibrillation. Mean age was 64,3 years, 35% were of female gender, 1020 (75%) procedures performed were in Cryo-technique. Almost 46% of the patient population had a CHADS-VASC score&gt;2 and only 18% a HAS-BLED &gt;2. Spontaneous echocontrast grade 3 (SEC 3) was seen in 135 (9.9%) TEE examinations, 1225 examinations were inconspicuous. Despite these findings, patients with SEC 3 underwent catheter ablation of AF, mainly due to disabling clinical symptoms associated with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Catheter ablation was performed with uninterrupted oral anticoagulation in 933 cases (69%), during the ablation procedure patients received unfractionated Heparine (ACT&gt;300s). Results Twenty-five strokes (1,8%) occurred in 1360 ablation procedures, eleven patients suffered from a procedure related stroke and 14 patients had a transient ischemic attack. In the group of 135 cases with SEC 3 three transient ischemic attacks occurred (2.2%) as compared to 22 embolic events (1,8%, stroke n=11, TIA n=11) in the group with inconspicuous transesophageal echocardiogram. Considering the 933 patients with uninterrupted OAC there were no thromboembolic events at all on the group with SEC 3 compared to 12 (1.4%) events on the patients presenting without SEC 3. The type of oral anticoagulation (Vitamin K Antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant) had no effect on the overall results. Presence of SEC 3 failed to predict thromboembolic events even when the analysis was adjusted to possible explanatory variables such as age, gender, DOAC, paroxysmal or persistent AF. In contrast, interruption of oral anticoagulation prior to catheter ablation increased the risk of an embolic event (1, 3% versus 3.1%) significantly (p=0.03), specifically the detection of SEC 3 in the left atrium was a strong predictor of embolic events only in patients with interrupted oral anticoagulation (p=0.28, OR 2.4). Conclusion Spontaneous left atrial echocontrast seen prior to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation does not predict perioperative thromboembolic events in patients with uninterrupted oral anticoagulation. If oral anticoagulation is interrupted for catheter intervention and spontaneous echo contrast can be detected in the left atrium, the risk of embolic events doubles.

Continued Versus Interrupted Oral Anticoagulation During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Impact of Postoperative Anticoagulant Management on Outcome in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

The role of continued versus interrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis is uncertain. The aim of this retrospective investigation was to evaluate the impact (1) of continued versus interrupted OAC on early safety and (2) of postoperative anticoagulant management on the 1-year mortality in patients with AF who underwent TF-TAVI. Consecutive patients with AF and on OAC at admission (n = 598) were stratified according to interrupted (iVKA) versus continued vitamin K antagonist (cVKA) versus continued direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) at the time of TF-TAVI. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 early safety was the primary outcome measure. Patients with iVKA (n = 299), cVKA (n = 117), and DOAC (n = 182) had comparable baseline characteristics including age (p = 0.25), gender (p = 0.33), and STS-Score (p = 0.072). The proportion of patients having a CHA2DS2-VASc-Score ≥3 (p = 0.791) and HAS-BLED-Score ≥3 (p = 0.185) was not different between groups. The rate of early safety events (with lower values indicating superior safety) was lowest in DOAC (13.2%) and not increased in cVKA (19.7%) compared to iVKA (23.1%) (p = 0.029). Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 defined stroke (p = 0.527) and bleeding (p = 0.097) did not differ between groups. Renal failure occurred more often in iVKA compared to cVKA and DOAC (p = 0.02). All-cause 1-year mortality was 20.1% in iVKA, 13.7% in cVKA, and 8.8% in DOAC (p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis revealed DOAC to be associated with reduced all-cause 1-year mortality (HR 0.56 (95%-CI 0.32 to 0.99), p = 0.047) whereas cVKA was comparable to iVKA (HR 0.75 (95%-CI 0.43 to 1.31), p = 0.307). In conclusion, cVKA did not increase the rate for the composite end point of early safety at 30 days in this cohort of patients. Treatment with a DOAC was associated with a significantly reduced rate of early safety end points at 30 days and lower 1-year mortality.

2146Continued vs. interrupted oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortiv valve implantation

2146Continued vs. interrupted oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortiv valve implantation

Direct oral anticoagulants: A retrospective study of bleeding, behavior, and documentation.

To examine the effects of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on bleeding complications following dental surgeries. This 6-year retrospective study collected data from records of patients undergoing oral surgical procedures within a university setting. An electronic health record database was searched using current procedural terminology codes for oral surgical procedures. Information regarding patient, procedural factors, and postoperative complications were extracted. Data were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. Of patients who had a procedural code associated with oral surgery, only 0.11% (12/11,320) took a DOAC. Twelve patients (10 males, age ranging from 44 to 90years) underwent 17 surgeries by nine different practitioners involving 98 extractions, 14 alveoloplasties, two tuberosity reductions, and two tori removals. In nine cases, the DOAC was discontinued a mean of 52.5hrs prior to surgery (range 12-120hrs). Bleeding complications were not reported for patients whose drug was discontinued or continued. Documentation of drug continuation/discontinuation was poor. Bleeding was not observed with direct oral anticoagulation use in this oral surgery cohort. Drug discontinuation/continuation was not a factor in bleeding outcomes, and direct oral anticoagulation interruption was variable and poorly documented.

Botulinum toxin therapy in patients with oral anticoagulation: is it safe?

When used therapeutically, botulinum toxin (BT) has to be injected into its target tissues. All manufacturers warn not to do so in patients with oral anticoagulation to avoid haematoma. We wanted to study the haematoma frequency (HF) in patients with anticoagulation receiving BT therapy. 32 patients (16 females, 16 males, age 69.3±10.0years) with blepharospasm (n=6), hemifacial spasm (n=8), post-stroke spasticity (n=16), and cervical dystonia (n=2) received BT therapy (needle size 27G, post-injection tissue compression) whilst on anticoagulation (anticoagulation group, AG). 32 patients matched for disease, target muscles, age, and gender received identical BT therapy without anticoagulation (control group, CG). Anticoagulation was performed with phenprocoumon. International normalised ratio (INR) at the time of BT injection was in all patients within the recommended margins of 2.0 and 3.0 (mean 2.6±0.27). Overall HF was 3.0% in AG and 1.8% in CG (not significant). All hematomas occurred in blepharospasm patients (AG 5.2%, CG 2.6%, not significant) and hemifacial spasm patients (AG 3.9%, CG 2.9%, not significant). In cervical dystonia and spasticity there were no haematomas. Throughout an observation period of 4years, none of the haematomas was surgically relevant. Haematomas are a rare complication of BT therapy, mainly occurring in periocular injections. Anticoagulation only marginally increases HF, provided INR is controlled and appropriate injection techniques are used. Surgically relevant haematomas do not occur. Interruption of oral anticoagulation to perform BT therapy is not justified.

CARDIAC TAMPONADE DURING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ABLATION, BEFORE AND AFTER INTRODUCTION OF CONTACT FORCE SENSING CATHETERS

Introduction of the contact force (CF) sensing ablation catheter has been hypothesized to decrease rates of cardiac tamponade during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. While conventional radiofrequency ablation catheters have well established tamponade rates of 1-3%, data demonstrating the rates of tamponade with CF sensing ablation catheters is more limited. We sought to assess the incidence of cardiac tamponade before and after the introduction of the Smart-Touch™ (CARTO, Biosense Webster) CF sensing ablation catheter at our institution. All patients undergoing AF ablation procedures from January 1, 2010 to September 2, 2016 at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute (UOHI) were included. All ablation procedures performed with a conventional non-CF ablation catheter were completed before February 7, 2014. After this date all procedures were performed with a Smart-Touch™ CF ablation catheter in the absence of other deliberate changes of technique. All data were collected utilizing a prospective database. We also analyzed potential patient, operator, and procedural risk factors for tamponade. Note that all procedures were performed on interrupted oral anti-coagulation. Five hundred and ninety patients underwent 883 AF ablation procedures. Mean age was 62 years, 72% were male, and 72% had paroxysmal AF. Prior to the introduction of the Smart-Touch™ CF sensing ablation catheter 462 procedures were performed, with 9 tamponade events (9/462,1.9%). After the introduction of Smart-Touch™, 421 procedures were performed with 3 tamponade events (3/421, 0.7%, P=0.148). Analysis of other potential predictors is shown in Table 1. The only factor that was statistically significant was use of bridging heparin (P=0.021). On multivariate analysis this became non-significant (P=0.078). There was no significant difference in frequency of tamponade before and after introduction of contact force sensing catheters (1.9% v.s 0.7%, P=0.148).