Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Research Articles

Virtual interprofessional education for the African continent: AFRI-VIPE

This article details how multiple universities came together in 2019 during the Africa Interprofessional Education Network (AfrIPEN) conference in Nairobi, Kenya, to create an interprofessional, multi-continent, multi-university opportunity to give their students an asynchronous and synchronous virtual interprofessional experience through a programme known as VIPE (virtual interprofessional education). The programme, which was created after the conference, was entitled AFRI-VIPE (Africa virtual interprofessional education). From that conference, four AFRI-VIPE events have been implemented to date. Asynchronous material was created, and synchronous sessions were held that utilised problem-based learning to reinforce the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) core competencies. Students’ competency attainment was assessed using the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS), and analysis of those data showed significant improvements across all six interprofessional subscales for students at both North American- and African-based institutions, as well as across professional groups. All data were kept anonymous. Challenges experienced during AFRI-VIPE included the difference in time zones, student attrition, connectivity and survey response rates. Through their participation in the VIPE model, students and facilitators from a variety of countries and professions appreciated the opportunity to learn with, from and about other students through exposure to authentic case studies.

The Role of Interprofessional Education in Optimizing Laparoscopic Skills Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: This investigation evaluates the utility and benefits of integrating interprofessional education (IPE) into laparoscopic training, aiming to enrich medical education and skill acquisition methodologies. Methods: The study randomly allocated 36 participants of a 2023 laparoscopic training course into experimental and control groups, each comprising 18 individuals. The control group underwent traditional theory and practical training, whereas the experimental group additionally engaged in interdisciplinary instruction with nursing educators and participated in simulated laparoscopic surgery exercises. The effectiveness of this interdisciplinary approach was assessed by comparing laparoscopic theory and simulation performance, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores in animal-based training, and course satisfaction between the groups. Moreover, the impact on interdisciplinary collaborative competencies was measured through pre- and post-training self-evaluations using the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) in the experimental group. Results: The experimental group demonstrated superior performance in laparoscopic theory and simulation, as well as higher OSATS scores, compared with the control group. Satisfaction ratings regarding the skills practice mode, effects, and instructional quality were also significantly better in the experimental group (P < .05, P < .01). Furthermore, participants in the experimental group reported significant pre-to-post training enhancements in interprofessional communication, team collaboration, role perception, conflict management, and learning and feedback marked by statistically significant differences (P < .05, P < .01). Conclusion: The introduction of an IPE framework significantly boosts laparoscopic training efficiency and promotes team collaboration awareness. This model effectively bridges gaps between disciplines, illustrating substantial applicative value and expansion potential within medical education and skill training arenas.

Developing pre-licensure interprofessional and stroke care competencies through skills-based simulations

ABSTRACT Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in stroke care is accepted as best practice and necessary given the multi-system challenges and array of professionals involved. Our two-part stroke team simulations offer an intentional interprofessional educational experience (IPE) embedded in pre-licensure occupational therapy, physical therapy, pharmacy, medicine, nursing and speech-language pathology curricula. This six-year mixed method program evaluation aimed to determine if simulation delivery differences necessitated by COVID-19 impacted students’ IPC perception, ratings, and reported learning. Following both simulations, the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Assessment Scale (ICCAS) and free-text self-reported learning was voluntarily and anonymously collected. A factorial ANOVA using the ICCAS interprofessional competency factors compared scores across delivery methods. Content and category analysis was done for free-text responses. Overall, delivery formats did not affect positive changes in pre-post ICCAS scores. However, pre and post ICCAS scores were significantly different for interprofessional competencies of roles/responsibilities and collaborative patient/family centered approach. Analysis of over 10,000 written response to four open-ended questions revealed the simulation designs evoked better understanding of others’ and own scope of practice, how roles and shared leadership change based on context and client need, and the value of each team member’s expertise. Virtual-experience-only students noted preference for an in-person stroke clinic simulation opportunity.

Preparing healthcare professional students for rural, regional and remote practice: demonstrating the effectiveness of an interprofessional simulation learning experience

ABSTRACT Undertaking an authentic interprofessional simulation experience may be a useful and consistent strategy for healthcare professional students to build competencies required for a rural healthcare context. An observational comparative study design was adopted to evaluate a clinical simulation experience created to develop the interprofessional competencies of a sample of healthcare professional students at a regional university situated on multiple campuses in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Over 200 students across three campuses of the university were involved in a simulation experience that included four interprofessional activities. Of these students, 189 (89%) agreed to participate in the study. The healthcare professional students who participated in the study were from second year occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and podiatry, and third year speech pathology programs. Retrospective pre and post self-assessed interprofessional collaborative competencies were compared for all students using the revised Interprofessional Collaborative Attainment Survey (ICCAS). Results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in self-perceived scores using the validated revised ICCAS survey. The findings of this study suggest that carefully designed and authentic interprofessional simulation experiences can facilitate the development of competencies required for effective interprofessional practice, which are necessary for successful rural practice.

Navigating Supervision and Interprofessional Relationships in Health Psychology.

Previous literature has focused on either individual models of supervision, developing trainees' interprofessional competencies, or on developing and maintaining interprofessional relationships outside of training. For psychologists in medical settings, these concepts are inextricably linked, and supervision must combine these professional practices to successfully meet the needs of psychology trainees, patients, and interprofessional colleagues, in an increasingly integrated healthcare landscape. This paper presents a model for advancing interprofessional collaborative practice competencies in supervision as health psychology trainees progress through the developmental stages of clinical competency, while supervising psychologists also maintain interprofessional relationships. The Interprofessional Collaboration Supervision Model (IPCSM)for Psychology describes trainee, patient, and interprofessional team factors for supervising psychologists to consider in supervision, as well as various interventions to deploy when these interrelated dynamics impact training. Case examples are provided along with discussion on how to implement this model in supervision.

Building Interprofessional Competencies Through a Collaborative Prescribing Activity With Osteopathic, Pharmacy, and Physician Assistant Students.

Medication errors can lead to significant adverse events. Nearly 50% of medication errors occur during the prescription-writing stage of the medication use process, and effective interprofessional collaboration and communication are key to reducing error in this process. We developed a three-part, 60-minute, interprofessional education activity providing medical, physician assistant, and pharmacy students the opportunity to practice collegial interprofessional communication surrounding prescribing practices. Learners met virtually initially as a large group and divided into small groups facilitated by a health professional. Part 1 involved reviewing two prescriptions prepared by learners; part 2 was a discussion about the education, roles, and responsibilities of each profession; and part 3 focused on identifying prescription errors in examples provided by faculty. Students completed a post-pre survey measuring their perception of learning the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) areas. Of 317 participants (151 doctor of osteopathy, 68 master of physician assistant studies, and 98 doctor of pharmacy students), 286 completed the post-pre survey, for a 90% response rate. Students reported statistically significant (p < .001) increases in all 20 questions spanning the six ICCAS areas. The virtual format allowed multiple institutions to participate from various locations. It broadened the learners' experience by fostering interaction among those with varied perspectives and allowed collaboration between locations and programs that otherwise could not have participated. The activity introduced students to virtual collaboration and key telehealth skills, enhancing their confidence and familiarity with virtual interactions in a professional setting.

INTERPROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOURAL COUNSELLING; AN ESSENTIAL SKILL FOR OUR UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

INTRODUCTION Collaborative healthcare practices have positive impacts on dietary and physical activity behaviours (Patnode, et al., 2022). An immersive interprofessional work-integrated learning experience was developed for UOW Exercise Science and Rehabilitation(ExSc), and Dietetics and Nutrition(DNut) students, to appropriately prepare novice practitioners for significant growth in workforce interprofessional collaboration opportunities. METHOD Undergraduate(ExSc:n=47;DNut:n=48) students participated in an Interprofessional Education Workshop(IEW) aimed at improving understanding of interprofessionalism and behaviour counselling techniques. Students then formed into 46 pairs(ExSc:n=1+DNut:n=1) with each pair providing Interprofessional Behavioural Counselling(IBC) to a community client at two separate timepoints; Initial consultation and a 2-week Follow Up(FU). Student volunteers(n=38;ExSc:n=10,DNut:n=28) agreed to participate in the research phase, completing two surveys, Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Scale(ICCAS) &amp; Students Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education Revised(SPICE-R2) at two timepoints; immediately post IEW, and post FU. Additionally, volunteers(n=14;ExSc:n=3,DNut:n=11) participated in focus groupsfollowing IBC. Significance, set at (p&amp;lt;0.01) with mean score differences, and relative change (%) reported. RESULTS Participant responses(n=31) to ICCAS showed improvement across the five key areas of interprofessional practice; communication(0.8,23%), collaboration(1.1,32%), role and responsibilities(1.1, 33%), patient-centred care(1.2,36%), conflict-management and team-functioning(1.1,30%). Similarly, improvements in SPICE-R2 for patient outcomes(0.30,7%) and roles and responsibilities with collaborative-practice(0.67,17%), but not (p=0.06) for interprofessional teamwork and team-based practice. Focus groups indicated that students were confused pre-IBC about effective collaboration, specifically apprehension relating to perceived time constraints involved in having two professionals in one consultation. Conversely, post-IBC student’s reported increased confidence in adopting a collaborative approach, better understanding of scope of practice overlap and could see value in client outcomes following an interprofessional approach. CONCLUSION UOW will continue to embed interprofessional work integrated learning experiences in the future to improve understanding of collegial collaboration ensuring patient-centred care and best practice.

Building Interprofessional Competency Through A Virtual Cardiopulmonary Case Collaboration

Introduction Interprofessional education (IPE) experiences are prioritized as a key component of physician assistant (PA) and Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education programs’ curricula to reflect contemporary practice. Virtual IPE is reported to facilitate clinical decision making and teamwork in students. However, limited studies exist on its effectiveness to promote the IPE Collaborative's (IPEC) core competencies. As we aim to increase IPE in our curriculum, virtual IPE offers several advantages. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a case-based, virtual IPE improved students' knowledge and attitudes of collaborative team skills using the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Scale (ICCAS). Methods This study used a retrospective pretest-posttest design. Students in first-year PA and DPT programs (n = 130, PA = 48, DPT = 82) completed the ICCAS survey before and after attendance of a mandatory virtual IPE event. The virtual IPE session centered on designing a collaborative plan of care for an individual with congestive heart failure in an outpatient setting. To assess skill attainment, students completed the ICCAS survey. t Tests with Bonferroni's correction (P &lt; .01) were conducted for analyses. Results One hundred twenty-two students (PA = 46, DPT = 76) provided complete survey data. Statistically significant improvement was noted for all 20 questions (P &lt; .001). Large pre/post-IPE event effect sizes were observed for all 20 statements in the ICCAS. No statistically significant differences between the 2 disciplines were noted. Discussion Our findings suggest that a virtual case-based IPE experience may offer benefits to improve the student's attitude and knowledge related to IPEC during the initial year of PA and DPT programs. These data are encouraging as integration of virtual IPE experiences may affect teamwork competencies in healthcare programs.

An inter-university geriatric case competition helped students achieve interprofessional collaboration competencies.

An inter-university geriatric case competition helped students achieve interprofessional collaboration competencies.

Interprofessional collaboration skills and motivation one year after an interprofessional educational intervention for undergraduate medical and nursing students

BackgroundThe increasingly complex patient care in the twenty-first century is delivered by interprofessional health care teams. Interprofessional collaboration can be taught during interprofessional education. However, whether a long-term change in collaborative competencies can be achieved by interprofessional education has not been studied sufficiently. Our research questions were: How does motivation for interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional collaborative skills change up to one year after an interprofessional educational intervention? How are they related to each other?MethodsDuring a one-year period, undergraduate medical and nursing students attended four interprofessional (intervention) or uniprofessional (control group) education sessions. Self-determination Theory was used as the theoretical framework. Autonomous and controlled motivation scores for interprofessional collaboration were calculated using the Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire, before (T1), directly after (T2) and one year post-intervention (T3). At T3, the students also filled out the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS), which measured the perceived attainment of collaborative competencies by a retrospective pre-test/post-test design. We used linear mixed effects models to analyse the motivation scores and linear regression for the relation between motivation and competence.ResultsIn the interprofessional group, autonomous motivation scores of the participants were significantly lower at T2 vs. T1. Controlled motivation scores were significantly higher at T3 vs. T1. Controlled motivation scores for T2 were significantly higher in the uniprofessional group than in the interprofessional group. Perceived competence was related to higher autonomous motivation scores. At T3 the interprofessional collaborative competencies seemed to have grown more among students in the interprofessional group.ConclusionsThe perceived growth in interprofessional collaboration competence lasted at least up to one year after the intervention, and was measurable with the ICCAS. The growth was significantly more in the IPE students than in the UPE students. The few differences found in motivation scores for interprofessional collaboration were probably caused by an imbalance of nursing versus medical students over the different time points. This finding indicates that classroom based IPE can contribute to interprofessional collaboration skills of nursing and medical students at least up to one year after an intervention.

Evaluation of a virtual interprofessional oral-systemic health simulation experience in nursing, dentistry, medicine, and pharmacy education.

The annual teaching oral-systemic health (TOSH) virtual clinical simulation and case study activity exposes interprofessional teams of nurse practitioner, nurse midwifery, dental, medical, and pharmacy students to a virtual clinical simulation experience that uses oral-systemic health as a clinical exemplar for promoting interprofessional core competencies. The present study examines changes in participating students' self-reported interprofessional competencies following participation in virtual TOSH from 2020 to 2022. These findings are also compared to those from in-person TOSH (2019) to examine the equivalence of student outcomes of both the in-person and virtual programs. A pre- and post-test evaluation design was used to examine the effectiveness of exposure to the TOSH program on self-reported attainment of interprofessional competencies for participating students using the interprofessional collaborative competency attainment scale. Analysis of pre- and post-surveys demonstrated statistically significant improvement in students' self-rated interprofessional experience competencies following the virtual TOSH program, which aligns with results from the in-person cohorts. Similar findings between the in-person and virtual cohorts indicated no statistically significant difference between the two formats. These findings demonstrate the success of TOSH in promoting attainment of interprofessional competencies among future health professionals. We encourage administrators and faculty who lead health professional programs to take advantage of using virtual simulations as an integral component of interprofessional oral health clinical experiences where students from different health professions learn from and about each other in assessing and treating patients across the lifespan.

The Virtual Geriatric Assessment Interdisciplinary Team Project: Interprofessional Geriatric Training Against the Backdrop of COVID-19.

Interprofessional geriatric education programs enhance trainees' knowledge of older adults, and the valuable contributions health and social care practitioners make to their well-being when specialists work collaboratively. In response to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, in-person geriatric interprofessional education (IPE) programs were redesigned for virtual delivery. Nineteen virtual programs were held between September 2020 and December 2022. Of the 369 health and social care trainees who participated, 67.2% completed both pre- and post-program surveys. Survey instruments included the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICASS), which measures perceptions associated with patient-centered, team-based, collaborative care. Significant differences were obtained across ICASS domains, including communication, conflict management/resolution, and team functioning, suggesting that virtual programs may enhance attitudes and perceived abilities for interprofessional collaborative practice. Furthermore, participants' perceived understanding of older adult needs improved, as did their interest in geriatrics. Results illustrate that virtual geriatric interprofessional (IP) programs may be viable alternatives to in-person opportunities.

Fostering collaborative practice through interprofessional simulation for occupational therapy, physiotherapy, dietetics, and nursing students

ABSTRACT Literature regarding simulation for learning interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) indicates a need to include a range of health professions and to focus on students’ development of team communication and conflict resolution skills in day-to-day healthcare delivery. This study evaluated the impact of interprofessional simulation for occupational therapy, physiotherapy, dietetics, and nursing students on interprofessional collaboration competencies, specifically collaborative communication and conflict resolution during day-to-day interactions, and their intention for IPCP during placement. A series of simulations featuring the potential for interprofessional conflict and involving explicit coaching on communication and conflict resolution were conducted. A single cohort pre-test post-test design included the Students’ Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education Revised (SPICE-R), the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS), and an open response survey question on future intended practice. A total of 237 students participated in the simulation experience. Overall scores and scores on all IPCP competencies in the ICASS (n = 193) and SPICE-R (n = 226) improved for all professions post-simulation. The mean score of the ICCAS increased for 98% of the respondents and similarly the mean score of the SPICE-R increased for 71% of the respondents. Open-ended responses indicated students’ intentions to pursue self-leadership in IPCP. Students who participated in an interprofessional simulation reported perceived improvements in IPCP competencies and were encouraged to initiate IPCP when on placement in the practice setting.

A psychometric evaluation of inter-professional education competency tool in nursing and medicine students

IntroductionCollaboration between nurses and doctors is necessary for offering care to patients. Using team performance assessment tools and surveying them can be effective in promoting inter-professional collaboration, and the lack of a credible tool to assess inter-professional collaboration competency between the two groups is a major challenge in the healthcare sector. The present study aimed to translate and conduct a psychometric investigation on the inter-professional education collaboration (IPEC) tool for the students of medicine and nursing.MethodsThe present study was a cross-sectional one conducted as a psychometric investigation of the IPEC tool at the Iran University of Medical Sciences in 2022. The initial tool contained 42 items developed according to a 5-point Likert scale, which was translated into Persian with the consent of the original researcher. The validity index and the content validity ratio were investigated by a panel of 11 specialists in medical and clinical education, and its construct validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. Also, the second population of the study included medical and nursing students of Iran University of Medical Sciences and simple random sampling method. Moreover, the reliability of the instrument was investigated using internal consistency, Cronbach’s Alpha, and test–retest methods.ResultsBased on the indicators calculated to perform a psychometric investigation over the above tool, it had acceptable reliability and validity according to the specialists. The tool evaluates inter-professional collaboration competency between the students of medicine and nursing across four areas (values and ethics, roles and responsibilities, inter-professional communication, and team-based care and teamwork). Moreover, Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient for the tool was determined at 0.84.ConclusionThe results of the study showed that the above tool could evaluate inter-professional competency as a valid and reliable questionnaire, and its results could be utilized in planning and education.

The effectiveness of community-based interprofessional education for undergraduate medical and health promotion students

BackgroundCommunity-based interprofessional education (CBIPE) has been proven effective in enhancing the interprofessional competencies of medical and health professional students. However, there is a lack of evaluation on the impact of experiential CBIPE among undergraduate medical and health promotion students in Thailand. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the influence of CBIPE learning on the collaborative competencies of these students.MethodsA one-group pre-posttest design in 193 (152 medical students and 41 health promotion) students were involved in the CBIPE program, later divided into 12 groups. Data was collected by direct observations of mentors using the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS). The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the CBIPE program.ResultsA total of 175 (90.67%) completed ICCAS and satisfaction questions before and after the CBIPE program. The mean age of respondents was 20.29 ± 1.63 years; 60.57% were women and 39.43% were men. The results showed a significant increase in collaborative competencies before and after the 2-week course. Gender-stratified analysis showed an improvement after CBIPE training for all subscales in women, while the communication, collaboration, conflict management, and functioning team skills segment score was significantly higher in the post-assessment among men.ConclusionThe implementation of CBIPE learning was successful in enhancing collaborative competencies among both medical and health promotion students. These findings will provide valuable insights for the design and improvement of CBIPE learning programs in other universities.

Improved Soft-Skill Competencies of ABA Professionals Following Training and Coaching: A Feasibility Study

The field of applied behavior analysis currently faces critique regarding the need for increased compassion and interprofessional collaboration training toward culturally and emotionally responsive practice. Mindful self-compassion is evidenced to improve self-compassion and compassion. The purpose of the current study was to improve soft-skill competencies in collaboration and compassion of behavior analytic professionals. In this feasibility study, two cohorts of American behavior analytic professionals (N = 24) received a 4-month training-and-coaching sequence, with a pre-program focus group serving as the program’s needs assessment. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey and Self-Compassion Scale, Short Form were administered pre- and post-intervention to ascertain program effectiveness, alongside open-ended survey questions. Training included experiential learning opportunities in small groups, with participants practicing self-compassion and collaboration skills. Coaching included additional individual practice opportunities. Pre- and post-whole test scores were significantly different on both instruments, with p set at .05, demonstrating preliminary effectiveness. Significance on paired-sample t-test for the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey whole score fell at <.001, while for the Self-Compassion Scale, Short Form, it fell at .004. While prior studies have demonstrated the need for collaboration and compassion training within the ABA workforce, the current study reports on an implementation procedure to improve upon these skill sets, addressing a noted gap. Furthermore, the current study operationalizes collaboration alongside self-compassion, demonstrating the importance of centering collaborative practice within soft-skill awareness and competency. Future research can incorporate direct measures of these skill sets.

Working together or apart? Impact of interprofessional education on collaborative competencies of applied behavior analysis and occupational therapy practitioners

ABSTRACT Applied behavior analysis and occupational therapy practitioners uniquely serve neurodivergent individuals, despite interprofessional contention. While some qualitative research exists, there is a need for quantitative and mixed-methods evaluation of evidence-based strategies to improve the collaboration between occupational therapy practitioners and applied behavioral analysis professionals. This study aimed to improve collaboration for enhanced outcomes between individuals from these two professions. This program assessed change in collaborative competencies of occupational therapy and applied behavior analysis professionals, following virtual interprofessional education initiative provided by a licensed certificant from each profession. Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey, open-ended survey questions and recorded focus group were used to evaluate program impacts. Quantitative results were analyzed using paired-sample t-tests and revealed statistically significant increases in participants’ whole scores (p<.05). Qualitative analysis revealed the value of practical, problem-based learning. This study demonstrated the potentiality of virtual interprofessional education, question-answer dialogue, and actionable strategies. Future studies can increase sample size and implement longer-term models.

Perceived trauma nursing core competency, interprofessional collaborative competency, and associated barriers among regional trauma center nurses

IntroductionAs key members of interprofessional teams working in complex settings, nurses in trauma centers require trauma nursing core competency. PurposeThis study sought to determine the levels and relationships of the perceived importance and performance of trauma nursing core competency, as well as the interprofessional collaborative competency and associated barriers among Korean regional trauma center nurses. MethodsThis cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational survey involved a convenience sample of 190 Korean trauma center nurses. Data were collected using a web-based self-reporting questionnaire about the perceived importance and performance of trauma nursing core competency, as well as the interprofessional collaborative competency and associated barriers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression (Enter method) analyses. ResultsThe perceived performance and importance of interprofessional collaborative competency, the perceived importance of trauma nursing core competency, and the perceived barriers to resources, training, competency, and interest significantly affected trauma nursing core competency performance, accounting for 64.5 % of the variance. ConclusionsTraining programs are needed to improve the core and interprofessional collaborative competencies of trauma nurses. Individual, team, and organizational approaches are essential to addressing the perceived barriers. The effects of training programs on the core competency of trauma nurses should be validated.

Collaboration from a Distance: Remote Simulation in Hybrid Healthcare Education

Introduction: Simulation is an established method to teach interprofessional collaborative practice, but little is known about best practices when using simulation for remote learning activities in allied healthcare education. This mixed-methods study seeks to provide hybrid healthcare program educators with evidence regarding the effect of a remote simulation to address the topic of interprofessional collaboration. Methods: Authors investigated student self-assessed competency, satisfaction, and self-confidence in response to a remote learning activity in which Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students and licensed occupational therapists and speech language pathologists collaborated in a simulated pediatric case discussion via video-conferencing technology. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey-Revised and the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning scale were administered to 97 entry-level Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were completed to acquire student perception about the learning experience. Results: Results confirmed a significant increase in self-assessed collaborative competency attainment and students reported general levels of satisfaction and self-confidence in learning related to the interdisciplinary, remote simulated experience. Qualitative responses revealed three main themes: (1) unique interaction in a structured simulation experience, (2) ‘it was definitely a point of confirmation’, a learning experience, and (3) collaboration. Discussion: The use of remote healthcare simulation has the potential to improve interprofessional collaborative learning and practice among allied healthcare students. Faculty might consider the use of remote simulated experiences for the purpose of interprofessional learning in hybrid or online programs. Use of this teaching method within other groups of allied healthcare students should be examined. Implications for Practice Remote simulation can be an effective and satisfactory method of teaching interprofessional collaboration among allied healthcare students in hybrid programs. Quantitative and qualitative findings offer evidence that entry-level DPT students in hybrid programs value remote simulation as a learning opportunity and were engaged in the educational process. Faculty of hybrid allied health professional education programs may want to consider implementation of remote simulation for the purposes of interprofessional collaboration with the intent of readying students for practice.

Longitudinal Assessment of Pharmacy Students’ Collaborative Practice Abilities

ObjectiveInterprofessional education (IPE) varies across schools/colleges of pharmacy. Long-term impact of IPE on interprofessional collaborative competencies remains uncertain despite available data on singular experiences. This study aimed to evaluate changes in pharmacy students’ collaborative abilities over the second and third professional years (PYs). MethodsStudents completed the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Scale - Revised (ICCAS-R) after 2 large-scale interprofessional forums that occurred approximately 8 months apart. Four cohorts of students were used to examine the longitudinal change in collaborative abilities: cohort 1 (2019), cohort 2 (2020), cohort 3 (2021) and cohort 4 (2022). The ICCAS-R was used to capture data from 4 timepoints for each student in each cohort: prior to the Spring Forum in PY2 (T1), after the Spring Forum in PY2 (T2), prior to the Fall Forum in PY3 (T3), and after the Fall Forum in PY3 (T4). Using repeated measures analysis of variance, 4 total mean scores (T1 = pre1, T2 = post1, T3 = pre2, T4 = post2) were compared. ResultsFour cohorts (N = 414) completed the interprofessional forums and 336 (81%) completed the ICCAS-R instrument and were included. In each cohort, total mean scores increased T1 to T2 and T3 to T4, indicating an increase in self-assessed abilities pre/post-forum. Total mean scores decreased between T2 and T3, indicating that collaborative abilities decreased during the period between interprofessional forums. ConclusionWhile students' collaborative abilities increased around the time of the forum experiences, these changes decreased in between experiences. These findings suggest that interprofessional competencies should be reinforced at multiple time points to support enduring effects.