Interprofessional Care Teams Research Articles

Identifying strategies to support implementation of interprofessional primary care teams in Nova Scotia: Results of a survey and knowledge sharing event

BackgroundInterprofessional primary care teams (IPCTs) work together to enhance care. Despite evidence on the benefits of IPCTs, implementation remains challenging. This research aims to 1) identify and prioritize barriers and enablers, and 2) co-develop team-level strategies to support IPCT implementation in Nova Scotia, Canada.MethodsHealthcare providers and staff of IPCTs were invited to complete an online survey to identify barriers and enablers, and the degree to which each item impacted the functioning of their team. Top ranked items were identified using the sum of frequency x impact for each response. A virtual knowledge sharing event was held to identify strategies to address local barriers and enablers that impact team functioning.ResultsIPCT members (n = 117), with a mix of clinic roles and experience, completed the survey. The top three enablers identified were access to technological tools to support their role, standardized processes for using the technological tools, and having a team manager to coordinate collaboration. The top three barriers were limited opportunity for daily team communication, lack of conflict resolution strategies, and lack of capacity building opportunities. IPCT members, administrators, and patients attended the knowledge sharing event (n = 33). Five strategies were identified including: 1) balancing patient needs and provider scope of practice, 2) holding regular and accessible meetings, 3) supporting team development opportunities, 4) supporting professional development, and 5) supporting involvement in non-clinical activities.InterpretationThis research contextualized evidence to further understand local perspectives and experiences of barriers and enablers to the implementation of IPCTs. The knowledge exchange event identified actionable strategies that IPCTs and healthcare administrators can tailor to support teams and care for patients.

The Tapestry of Teamwork: Crafting a High Functioning Interprofessional Palliative Care Team

The Tapestry of Teamwork: Crafting a High Functioning Interprofessional Palliative Care Team

A-I-D for Cascades: Designing a theory-informed intervention for addressing prescribing cascades in primary care

Abstract Introduction Prescribing cascades, which occur when a medication is used to treat the side effect of another medication, are important contributors to polypharmacy. There is an absence of studies that evaluate the implementation or impact of existing interventions to address prescribing cascades in practice. Aim To design theory-informed options for interventions to address prescribing cascades within interprofessional primary care teams. Methods The Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework, and its eight steps, were applied to guide intervention development by the research team. Three target behaviours were drafted and prioritised for intervention development based on data collected as part of two qualitative studies exploring why and how cascades occur across practice settings.[1,2] A target behaviour was selected and the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation-behaviour) model was then applied to identify the relevant factors for interprofessional primary care teams. The BCW was used to determine the relevant intervention types and policy options for the behaviour. Next, corresponding behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were identified and intervention options drafted. Prioritisation of behaviours and intervention examples were guided by the APEASE criteria (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness/cost-effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects/safety, Equity). Results The three target behaviours involved supporting: 1) healthcare providers to ask about, investigate and manage cascades (often through deprescribing), 2) the public to ask about prescribing cascades, and 3) the public to share medication histories and experiences with healthcare providers. The team selected the healthcare provider behaviour, called A-I-D (ask, investigate, deprescribe), for intervention development. Psychological capability and physical opportunity were determined to be the most relevant COM-B components, corresponding to education, training, environmental restructuring, and enablement intervention types and the guidelines, communications and marketing, and service provision policy options within the BCW model. Ultimately, 10 intervention options comprised of BCTs were developed by the team, which are ready for further prioritisation by stakeholders. These can be grouped into three categories: provision of educational content or materials for use by clinicians, provision of consultation or training to support clinicians, and knowledge mobilisation strategies. Through the process, the team identified that development of a practice guidance tool, which assists healthcare providers to investigate and manage prescribing cascades, is needed to support further intervention development. Conclusion The BCW framework guided the design of intervention options that will support primary care clinicians practising in interprofessional teams to address prescribing cascades. A limitation of this work is that applying the BCW framework required several judgements by the team, comprised of scientists, pharmacists, and nurses but not a general practitioner physician. Many but not all have practised with primary care interprofessional teams. When identifying interventions for future consultation, it was determined that the development of a practice guidance tool (i.e., which assists with identifying, investigating, and managing prescribing cascades) underpinned all the proposed interventions for addressing prescribing cascades in practice. Further research is needed to determine what primary care clinicians will need in this practice guidance tool and how it will be used in practice, to support its development.

Psychosocial Distress Screening Among Interprofessional Palliative Care Teams: A Narrative Review

With increased need for palliative care and limited staffing resources, non-social workers are increasingly responsible for screening for urgent psychosocial distress. The National Consensus Project guidelines call for all palliative care team members to be competent in screening across domains. Yet, in contrast to an abundance of evidence-informed tools for palliative social work assessments, standardization for interprofessional psychosocial screening is lacking. This lack of standardized practice may lead to harmful disparities in care delivery. The purpose of this narrative review is to examine current literature on evidence-informed practices for psychosocial screening within palliative care. Google Scholar, a university Summon library search engine, and prominent palliative care journals were searched using the same phrases to locate articles for inclusion. Each article was reviewed and synthesized across common themes. Although an abundance of validated screening tools exists for outpatient oncology-specific settings, there is minimal guidance on psychosocial screening tools intended for specialty palliative care. The most oft-cited tools have been met with concern for validity across diverse palliative care populations and settings. Additional research is needed to operationalize and measure brief psychosocial screening tools that can be validated for use by interprofessional palliative care teams, a stepping-stone for increased equity in palliative care practice.

The Role of the Athletic Trainer in Providing Care to Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients: Considerations for Medical Affirmation-Part II.

Recently, with discriminatory legislation efforts and changing participation policies in organized sports, media attention surrounding transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals has increased. These changes and the historical lack of competence and education regarding the transgender patient population have resulted in subpar patient care and a misunderstanding of the athletic trainer's (AT's) role within the health care and compliance systems. This literature review is the second part of a 2-paper series, and our objective was to educate ATs on the processes relevant to medical affirmation, including compliance considerations regarding medical eligibility, and to establish the AT's role. The gender affirmation framework includes social and legal components, which are discussed in part 1 of this literature, and the medical component is thoroughly discussed in part 2. All health care providers involved in the care of TGD individuals should work collaboratively on an interprofessional care team and have a general knowledge of the gender-affirmation process, including gender-affirming hormone therapy, surgical options, known risks and complications, and the general health needs of TGD patients. With this knowledge, ATs, as point-of-care providers and members of the interprofessional care team, are uniquely positioned to help reduce health and health care disparities. Furthermore, ATs can use their knowledge to facilitate medical compliance and eligibility in the evolving policies of sporting organizations.

Increasing patient safety due to an implemented ward pharmacist in an interprofessional cancer care team evaluated in a prospective, controlled intervention study

Increasing patient safety due to an implemented ward pharmacist in an interprofessional cancer care team evaluated in a prospective, controlled intervention study

The Role of the Athletic Trainer in Providing Care to Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients: Foundational Knowledge and Disparities-Part I.

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients experience discrimination, harassment, marginalization, and minority stress at greater rates than their cisgender counterparts, leading to numerous health and health care disparities that negatively affect well-being and access to quality health care.1 Despite being in an opportune position to improve health equity for TGD patients under their care, many athletic trainers (ATs) report having little to no formal education on TGD patient care, leading to a reduction in self-reported competence. As such, to fill this knowledge gap, the purposes of the first part of this 2-part narrative literature review are to (1) provide readers with foundational information and terminology, (2) explore relevant health and health care disparities, and (3) identify the role of the AT within an interprofessional care team treating TGD patients.

When interprofessionalism also involves the patient: how to provide good healthcare beyond care

The prevalence of aging-related chronic diseases makes it necessary to change organizational structures. In order to facilitate the transformation of health systems, interprofessional care teams, patient engagement, and collaborative practice will be necessary. Patient-centered interprofessional care is a process based on the collaborative relationship between healthcare professionals, patients and caregivers, as a useful strategy to “develop a shared understanding of the problem and generate a mutually acceptable assessment and management of the care plan”. Everything must take place on a collaborative level, always respecting the different skills. Although the literature provides preliminary information to support the benefits of the patient-centered approach, transformational leadership and an organizational culture are needed to foster learning, research, and the implementation of innovative models to patient care. Furthermore, in the Italian healthcare reality, the aspects of practicability and “sustainability” of this model of care should be considered and the key elements, mechanisms and stages of development necessary for its possible implementation should be better defined.

Patient Education Practices and Preferences of Radiation Oncologists and Interprofessional Radiation Therapy Care Teams: A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring Strategies for Effective Patient Education Delivery

Purpose/ObjectivesPatients’ understanding of radiotherapy (RT) and data regarding optimal approaches to patient education (PE) within radiation oncology (RO) are limited. We aimed to evaluate PE practices of radiation oncologists and interprofessional RT care team members to inform recommendations for delivering inclusive and accessible PE. Materials/MethodsAn anonymous survey was administered to all Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group (ROECSG) members (10/5/22-11/23/22). Respondent demographics, individual practices/preferences, and institutional practices were collected. Qualitative items explored strategies, challenges, and desired resources for PE. Descriptive statistics summarized survey responses. Fisher's exact test compared PE practices by respondent role and PE timing. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative responses. Results113 ROECSG members completed the survey (28.2% response rate); RO attendings comprised 68.1% of respondents. Most practiced in an academic setting (85.8%) in North America (80.5%). Institution-specific materials were the most common PE resource used by radiation oncologists (67.6%). Almost half (40.2%) reported that their PE practices differed based on clinical encounter type, with paper handouts commonly used for in-person and multimedia for telehealth visits. Only 57.7% reported access to non-English PE materials. PE practices amongst radiation oncologists differed according to RT clinical workflow timing (consultation vs simulation vs first RT, respectively): one-on-one teaching: 88.5% vs 49.4% vs 56.3%, p<0.01 and paper handouts: 69.0% vs 28.7% vs 16.1%, p<0.01. Identified challenges for PE delivery included limited time, administrative barriers to the development or implementation of new materials or practices, and a lack of customized resources for tailored PE. Effective strategies for PE included utilization of visual diagrams, multimedia, and innovative education techniques to personalize PE delivery/resources for a diverse patient population, as well as fostering interprofessional collaboration to reinforce educational content. ConclusionsRadiation oncologists and interprofessional RO team members engage in PE, with most utilizing institution-specific materials often available only in English. PE practices differ according to clinical encounter type and RT workflow timing. Increased adoption of multimedia materials and partnerships with patients to tailor PE resources are needed to foster high-quality, patient-centered PE delivery.

A rural interprofessional primary care team develops a school-based sex education program

In French rural areas, getting information about sexual health and identifying health actors on the topic is difficult for teenagers. Despite national and international guidelines, school-based sex education programs remain insufficient in France. The aim of this project was to develop a school-based psycho-affective and sexual health program (PASHP) for teenagers, led by an interprofessional primary care team (IPCT) in Montval-sur-Loir (Sarthe) and to coordinate local stakeholders. The IPCT developed the PASHP using a community-based participatory research method. The first step identified the target population and its needs for sex education. The second step was to create a steering group to tailor PASHP interventions in a participatory way and to define the PASHP’s aims and execution arrangements. The third step aimed at carrying out the PASHP and getting stakeholders’ and the target population’s feedback. The PASHP, carried out in the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 school years, included an intervention about contraception and sexually transmitted infections, artistic workshops on consent or gender stereotypes, group discussions, and an intervention about pornography to assist parents. The PASHP developed and coordinated by the Montval-sur-Loir IPCT is innovative because of its organization. It coordinates local stakeholders, teenagers, and their parents in a disadvantaged rural area, respecting national guidelines on sex education.

Evaluating the influence of primary healthcare nurse practitioners' interventions in home care on hospitalizations and emergency department transfers.

Home care allows patients with functional limitations to receive services at home and prevent health decline. Home care can reduce hospitalization and emergency department (ED) transfers. Integrating primary healthcare nurse practitioners (PHCNPs) in home care increases the supply of services, but little is known about their influence on patients' ability to remain at home. Evaluate the influence of PHCNPs' interventions on hospitalizations and ED transfers in patients receiving care from interprofessional home care teams with PHCNPs. The retrospective cohort study employed multiple logistic regression and Cox modelling techniques to assess the influence of PHCNP interventions on hospitalizations and ED transfers. Descriptive and bivariate analyses examined sample characteristics and variable associations. Four purposively selected sites in Québec, Canada, were included. Data were collected from electronic health records of all patients (n = 343) receiving home care from these teams. The characteristics of the sites, sample, and PHCNP interventions were described. Planned interventions led to a 5.8% decrease in hospitalizations and ED transfers (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.058, p = 0.039), while unplanned interventions resulted in a 1.5-fold increase in this outcome (adjusted OR: 1.518, p < 0.001). The risk of hospitalization and ED transfers increased by 10.7 times with unplanned interventions (adjusted OR: 10.651, p = 0.002). Furthermore, imaging was associated with a 2-fold increased risk (adjusted OR: 1.954, p = 0.021), consultations with a 1.8-fold increased risk (adjusted OR: 1.849, p = 0.034), and laboratory test-related interventions after 30 or more days reduced the risk by 68.0% (adjusted OR: 0.320, p < 0.001). PHCNPs in interprofessional home care teams show promise in reducing hospitalizations and ED transfers through planned visits. These findings provide valuable insights that can contribute to enhancing home care services for a population with limited access to healthcare and high healthcare needs. Further research is needed in other jurisdictions.

"We're all truly pulling in the exact same direction": A qualitative study of attending and resident physician impressions of structured bedside interdisciplinary rounds.

Physicians often hold leadership roles in implementing interdisciplinary rounds (IDR) in clinical settings, thus understanding physician perspectives of bedside IDR is crucial. To understand physicians' perspectives of structured bedside IDR. Qualitative descriptive study. Medical and transitional year resident and hospitalist physicians participating in structured bedside IDR in a community teaching hospital affiliated with a large academic center. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with study participants about their experiences with participating in structured bedside IDR between July 2017 and April 2018. All interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. We used thematic analysis to identify key themes. We interviewed 41 resident physicians and 10 hospitalist physicians and discovered five key themes that highlight physician impressions of bedside IDR. Bedside IDR decreased unnecessary care, screened for risks/errors, created a shared mental model of care, and increased physician empathy for the patient and the interprofessional care team. Physicians felt patients valued the streamlined communication they experienced but questioned the intrusiveness of large healthcare teams. Challenges to bedside IDR included the meaningful engagement of key stakeholders and, particularly for resident physicians, the difficultly of managing unstandardized communication in a standardized time-sensitive setting. Structured bedside IDR have the capacity to improve patient care, interprofessional teamwork, and physician empathy for patients and the interprofessional team. However, sustained leadership support and clearly defined rounds goals and objectives are necessary ingredients to maximize the benefits and address the challenges of bedside IDR.

Does power distance in healthcare teams linked to patient satisfaction? A multilevel study of interprofessional care teams in a referral hospital in Indonesia.

Interprofessional care teams collaborate to provide care to patients in hospitals to ensure their full recovery. To provide quality patient care, healthcare workers must have a comprehensive understanding of each other's roles and collaborate effectively. Good interpersonal skills are also essential for maintaining cooperative and collaborative relationships, listening, and respecting other team member's values and positions. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of power distance in interprofessional care on patients' satisfaction. A quantitative study was conducted in a hospital by using a questionnaire instrument to collect information from patients and members of the interprofessional care team. The respondents included 10 geriatric, 19 palliative, 36 cancer, 8 burn, and 18 medical intermediate care (MIC) teams. Subsequently, a hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to examine whether interprofessional care could significantly predict the relationship between team power distance and patient satisfaction. The measurement of the effect of power distance in interprofessional care among doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and nutritionists on patient satisfaction revealed nonsignificant results. However, the final analysis indicated negative coefficients with regard to power distance for nutritionists (-0.033098), nurses (-0.064912), and pharmacists (-0.006056). These findings indicated that the power distance associated with these professions was linked with decreased patient satisfaction. The results suggested that power distance within an interprofessional care team can reduce patient satisfaction.

Barriers and enablers to implementing interprofessional primary care teams: a narrative review of the literature using the consolidated framework for implementation research

BackgroundInterprofessional primary care teams have been introduced across Canada to improve access (e.g., a regular primary care provider, timely access to care when needed) to and quality of primary care. However, the quality and speed of team implementation has not kept pace with increasing access issues. The aim of this research was to use an implementation framework to categorize and describe barriers and enablers to team implementation in primary care.MethodsA narrative review that prioritized systematic reviews and evidence syntheses was conducted. A search using pre-defined terms was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, and potentially relevant grey literature was identified through ad hoc Google searches and hand searching of health organization websites. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to categorize barriers and enablers into five domains: (1) Features of Team Implementation; (2) Government, Health Authorities and Health Organizations; (3) Characteristics of the Team; (4) Characteristics of Team Members; and (5) Process of Implementation.ResultsData were extracted from 19 of 435 articles that met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Most barriers and enablers were categorized into two domains of the CFIR: Characteristics of the Team and Government, Health Authorities, and Health Organizations. Key themes identified within the Characteristics of the Team domain were team-leadership, including designating a manager responsible for day-to-day activities and facilitating collaboration; clear governance structures, and technology supports and tools that facilitate information sharing and communication. Key themes within the Government, Health Authorities, and Health Organizations domain were professional remuneration plans, regulatory policy, and interprofessional education. Other key themes identified in the Features of Team Implementation included the importance of good data and research on the status of teams, as well as sufficient and stable funding models. Positive perspectives, flexibility, and feeling supported were identified in the Characteristics of Team Members domain. Within the Process of Implementation domain, shared leadership and human resources planning were discussed.ConclusionsBarriers and enablers to implementing interprofessional primary care teams using the CFIR were identified, which enables stakeholders and teams to tailor implementation of teams at the local level to impact the accessibility and quality of primary care.

Remaining Relevant in a Changing Healthcare Organization

Registered dietitian nutritionists working in ambulatory clinics should not be waiting for an administrator to invite them to the planning group for the transition from fee for service to value-based care payment models. Registered dietitian nutritionists should be identifying and promoting the services they can provide to ensure quality healthcare for patients. In this article, we describe value-based care as it is presented in dietetics literature. We also describe how registered dietitian nutritionists in our family medicine practice demonstrate their value as a member of the expanded interprofessional ambulatory care team providing quality care, reducing costs, and providing an exceptional experience for the patient. We call on educators of dietetics students, interns, and professionals to teach the necessary interprofessional skills to be successful in value-based care models of care.

Patients' experiences of and roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: a constructivist grounded theory study.

This constructivist grounded theory study aimed to (1) explore patients' experiences of and roles in interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care and (2) consider the relevance and alignment of an existing theoretical framework on patients' roles and based on the experiences of patient advocates. High-quality management of chronic conditions requires an interprofessional collaborative practice model of care considering an individual's mental, physical, and social health situation. Patients' experiences of this model in the primary care setting are relatively unknown. A constructivist grounded theory approach was taken. Interview data were collected from primary care patients with chronic conditions across Australia in August 2020 - February 2022. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed by (1) initial line-by-line coding, (2) focused coding, (3) memo writing, (4) categorisation, and (5) theme and sub-theme development. Themes and sub-themes were mapped against an existing theoretical framework to expand and confirm the results from a previous study with a similar research aim. Twenty adults with chronic conditions spanning physical disability, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, autoimmune, and mental health conditions participated. Two themes were developed: (1) Adapting to Change with two sub-themes describing how patients adapt to interprofessional team care and (2) Shifting across the spectrum of roles, with five sub-themes outlining the roles patients enact while receiving care. The findings suggest that patients' roles are highly variable and fluid in interprofessional collaborative practice, and further work is recommended to develop a resource to support greater patient engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice.

"Building More Connected Primary Care: Improving Connections between Primary Care and Community Care, Specialists and Hospitals for Timely and Appropriate Care"

Although strong, well connected primary care results in better health outcomes and health equity at a lower cost, most family physicians in Ontario, Canada are not supported by teams and have variable connections to other system sectors resulting in variable access and quality of care. A continuous relationship with a family physician and primary care team facilitates access to timely care, appropriate preventive care, reduced acute care utilization and costs, reduced mortality and more satisfied patients. This was further confirmed during the COVID 19 pandemic when patients who were attached to primary care teams had superior care for both COVID and non-COVID health issues.&#x0D; Together with patients, families, family physicians and all health care sectors, we co-created and evaluated efficient models of connecting family physicians to: specialists for just in time advice, virtual and in-person consults; to interprofessional teams tailored to the needs of their practices and to navigation services tailored to primary care. These models were co-designed with family physicians and continue to evolve based on their evolving needs:&#x0D; SCOPE (Seamless Care Optimizing the Patient Experience) connects primary care providers (PCPs) in the community to real-time supports through a single point of access, Co-designed with local PCPS, SCOPE improves access to an interprofessional team who can help with urgent medical consultations, diagnostic imaging, curated home and community care, mental health, and navigation of other services available in the hospital or in the community.&#x0D; TIP (Telemedicine IMPACT PLUS) TIP (Telemedicine IMPACT Plus) provides rapid access to case consultation by a virtual team of health care professionals to enable proactive health and social care for patients living with multi-morbidity. The case conference involves the patient/caregivers, family physician and TIP RN along with the consulting team that consists of: Psychiatrist, Internist, Pharmacist, Social Worker, Home Care Coordinator, Dietitian and others as required. The purpose of this consultation is to coordinate care and derive new solutions for addressing chronic conditions. A dedicated&#x0D; TIP nurse facilitator prepares the case, facilitates the consultation with one of 12 available teams, summarizes a coordinated care plan and coordinates the patient’s circle of care.&#x0D; Building interprofessional primary care teams based on family physician patient roster needs relies on nourishing foundational relationships with local PCPs to help identify gaps in care, engaging PCPS in continuous program improvement and developing partnerships with key stakeholders: leadership from the anchor hospital and their specialist groups, home and community care and community organizations. Joint implementation is based on the value proposition that all sectors win when care is appropriately triaged and managed in the community.&#x0D; When combined, connected and integrated into primary care practices, these initiatives build the Patient Medical Home, with the PCP at the centre of care, support to more effectively co-manage patients using existing resources more efficiently mapped to patient needs. These initiatives support relationship-based navigation, the underpinning of team-based primary care essential to improving system navigation for timely access to needs-based care.&#x0D; The target audience: patients, families, interprofessional primary care providers, specialists, home care and community providers, and hospitals.&#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D; &#x0D;

Integration of a dental hygienist into the interprofessional long-term care team.

To address poor oral health of residents in long-term care homes (LTCH), this study explored the process of integrating an educational resource and a dental hygienist on the interprofessional care team. This convergent mixed-methods study took place at a 472-bed LTCH in Toronto, Canada from February to August 2018. Nurses employed at the LTCH participated in the study. During the study period, a dental hygienist was integrated into an interprofessional LTCH team. Nurses completed an online eLearning module about using the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) when referring residents' oral health concerns to a. Pre/post knowledge quizzes, module feedback and satisfaction surveys were administered. A retrospective chart review examined OHAT use and compared nurse and dental hygienist oral health assessments. Two cycles of semi-structured interviews with five nurses explored experiences with the eLearning module, OHAT and integration of the dental hygienist into the team. Nurses scored well on the knowledge quizzes and reported comfort in using the OHAT to refer oral concerns to a dental hygienist; however, actual use was minimal. oral health issues were under-reported by nurses on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS); the dental hygienist reported significantly more debris, teeth lost and carious teeth (all P < 0.0001). Qualitative analysis indicated that the nurses valued dental hygienist integration into the team. Using knowledge mobilisation practices, a new oral health referral tool was developed. This study highlights the feasibility and desirability of an oral health eLearning module, practical assessment tools and participation of a dental hygienist on the LTCH interprofessional care team.

Abstract 14758: Using Interprofessional Continuing Education to Identify and Address Knowledge and Practice Gaps Regarding Lipoprotein(a) as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor

Introduction: High levels of Lp(a) are an independent and casual risk factor for ASCVD, though there is a lack of standardization of assays, guidelines, and targeted treatments. Hypothesis/Goals: To provide a dynamic, expert-led interprofessional continuing education (IPCE) activity for cardiologists, primary care (PC) clinicians, and pharmacists to educate on evolving standards in the assessment and management of Lp(a) as a CV risk factor. Methods: Vindico Medical Education provided a 2-day IPCE webinar on February 11 and 25, 2023. Baseline knowledge and behaviors, educational impact, and persisting perceived challenges were assessed via pre-, intra-, and post-test. Results: Complete datasets were available for 1,364 HCPs (13% cardiologists, 18% PC, 53% pharmacists, 16% other). Baseline knowledge was lowest in all cohorts regarding Lp(a) assessment vs management, and higher among cardiologists vs other professional cohorts. Low baseline knowledge translated to poor baseline competence on case-based questions, particularly regarding assessment and desirable Lp(a) levels. Additionally, only 42% of cardiologists were currently recommending Lp(a) screening for patients. Regarding management, while most were aware that PCSK9 inhibitors produced the greatest reduction in Lp(a) levels, knowledge scores regarding the use of lipid-apheresis and emerging pharmacotherapies was low (30% and 49%, respectively). Moreover, 64% on average were using statins to reduce Lp(a), despite proven benefit. Overall there was a 146% relative increase in knowledge, though the top requested topics for additional education were updates on how and in whom to offer Lp(a) screening and testing, communicating with the interprofessional care team and patient, and options for Lp(a) management, particularly as new options become available. Conclusions: Cardiology, pharmacy, and primary care clinicians who manage at elevated CV risk have inadequate knowledge regarding Lp(a) screening and management. While the IPCE provided addressed these knowledge and practice gaps, continued education is needed to facilitate practice change towards optimal patient care. As new options for screening and treatment become available, continued education is warranted.

Factors influencing behavioral intentions of graduating pharmacy students regarding interprofessional collaboration – a theory-driven qualitative study

BackgroundInterprofessional collaboration enhances the use of competencies of different medical team members. Additionally, pharmacists’ involvement in patient care has been shown to improve their outcomes and seems particularly valuable in chronic diseases. Therefore, due to the aging of society and the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, efforts are needed to involve pharmacists more broadly in patient care. However, there is a limited understanding of what factors could influence their willingness to participate in an interprofessional care team, especially among pharmacy students only entering the profession. This study aimed to fill these knowledge gaps by exploring graduating pharmacy students’ intentions in this regard guided by the theory of planned behavior.MethodsWe conducted seventeen semi-structured interviews with graduating pharmacy students of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, which were then thematically analyzed by two researchers.ResultsPositive attitudes of respondents, who mentioned the possibility of acquiring new knowledge, skills, and competencies, increased prestige and appreciation of the pharmacist’s profession, a better quality of patient care, and the support and relief offered to other team members as a result of collaboration, seem to strengthen their intentions. However, they also expressed their worries about potential errors and knowledge gaps, which constituted an example of some existing negative feelings. The identified sources of generally mixed social pressure toward the behavior included other pharmacists and pharmacy students, physicians, patients, their relatives and friends, and the decision and policymakers. Finally, their intentions may also be weakened by the mentioned perceived behavioral control aspects, like their level of pharmaceutical and clinical knowledge, skills, and experience, their knowledge of representatives of other professions and collaboration, the atmosphere at their future place of work, co-workers’ potential reluctance to collaborate with them, finding time for collaboration, the existence of incentives and gratification system, and existing legal regulations.ConclusionsThe attitudes of graduating pharmacy students toward interprofessional collaboration seem mostly positive, but their intentions might be weakened by the mixed sense of social pressure and factors decreasing their perceived behavioral control.