BackgroundAsymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) affects 2-15% of pregnant women, with 20-40% developing symptoms later. Symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) are more common in pregnancy, with a prevalence of 33%, posing risks like preterm delivery, low birth weight, and maternal pyelonephritis. The gold standard for UTI detection is a urine culture, but point-of-care urinalysis dipsticks are frequently performed as screens during regular obstetric visits. Leukocyte esterase has been used to justify treatment in the asymptomatic, even with low sensitivity and specificity. Confirmatory tests are crucial to avoid false positives and ensure optimal outcomes. Current guidelines for urinalysis dipstick interpretation and the decision to treat ASB in pregnancy are limited. It remains unclear if an evidence-based algorithm can improve test utilization, diagnosis, and treatment decisions for ASB in pregnancy. ObjectivesThe primary objective of our study is to develop, implement, and evaluate an evidence-based algorithm to guide urinalysis interpretation, culturing, diagnosis, and antibiotic stewardship of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant patients during routine obstetric visits. Study DesignThe project involves both retrospective and quasi-experimental prospective chart reviews of pregnant patients aged 18 and older, beyond 20 weeks gestation, from routine obstetric visits with urinalysis dipstick tests. A doctorate in clinical laboratory sciences student developed an educational algorithm to guide urinalysis dipstick interpretation, culturing necessity, and treatment decisions based on evidence-based practice. Our study considered patient records from February 1 – 28, 2022 as retrospective (pre-algorithm implementation) data and January 24 - February 22, 2023, as prospective (post-algorithm implementation) data. Data collected from the electronic medical record included de-identified patient information, urinalysis results, culture dates and outcomes, antibiotic prescriptions, UTI or ASB diagnoses, provider details, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and demographics. Data analysis using SPSS version 29 involved chi-square tests, likelihood ratios, and effect size calculations, with P-values <0.05 considered statistically significant. ResultsIn our study, we examined a total of 1,176 patient records. Pre-implementation data included 440 records, with 224 abnormal and 216 normal urinalyses. Post-implementation data encompassed 736 records, of which 255 were abnormal and 481 were normal. The patient demographics predominantly featured White (87%), with a median maternal age of 27 years and a gestational age of 32 weeks. Our pre-implementation analyses revealed significant associations between algorithm deviations with both culture utilization (P <.001) and antibiotic stewardship (P <.001). However, no significant associations were observed between algorithm deviations and adverse patient outcomes. Culture underutilization decreased significantly from 43.0% (189/440) pre-implementation to 29.5% (217/736) post-implementation (P < .001). The overall reduction in ASB prevalence from 16.3% (8/49) to 6.7% (10/67) suggests a decrease of nearly 60%. Additionally, antibiotic overprescription decreased significantly from 1.6% (4/258) pre-implementation to 0.8% (4/522) post-implementation (P = .003), with a reduction from 7.1% (3/42) to 2.4% (1/41) among abnormal urinalyses. ConclusionOur findings show a strong alignment between the use of the algorithm and subsequent clinical decisions, underscoring its potential to enhance patient care and management in obstetric settings. Notably, adherence to the algorithm was higher among providers displaying prudent antibiotic use.