You have accessJournal of UrologyReconstruction, Transitional Cell Carcinoma & Adrenal1 Apr 2011V858 ROBOTIC VESICOVAGINA FISTULA REPAIR Aqsa Khan, Claudia Sevilla, and Jennifer Anger Aqsa KhanAqsa Khan Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author , Claudia SevillaClaudia Sevilla Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author , and Jennifer AngerJennifer Anger Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.680AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Robotic technology provides a minimally invasive abdominal approach to reconstructive pelvic surgery that can be performed by many pelvic surgeons, not just expert laparoscopists. Some might argue that the improved dexterity of the robot, precision of instruments, and the three-dimensional imaging of the robotic camera provides a technical advantage over open abdominal and vaginal approaches. The post-hysterectomy vesico-vaginal fistula (VVF) repair is an example of an operation that, in many instances, may benefit from robotic technology. METHODS This video describes the surgical techniques of robotic-assisted VVF repair. RESULTS To reduce inflammation after surgical injury, waiting up to three months before repair is optimal. Intra-operative ureteral stenting with open-ended stents can aid in intra-operative visualization of the ureteral orifices. Identification of planes is aided by manipulation of a vaginal stent and intra-operative filling of the bladder. Robotic assistance greatly aids in developing and extending the plane between the vagina and the bladder. The vagina and bladder are each closed in two layers. Interposition of omentum or bladder peritoneum is ideal, though other biologic material can be used when endogenous tissue is not available. Generally a foley catheter or suprapubic tube is left for three weeks, at which time a cystogram is performed and the catheter is removed. CONCLUSIONS In proximal VVFs, particularly those where vaginal access is difficult, robotic-assisted VVF repair provides a durable result through a minimally invasive abdominal approach. Larger series are needed to compare outcomes to open abdominal and vaginal approaches. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e344 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Aqsa Khan Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Claudia Sevilla Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Jennifer Anger Los Angeles, CA More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract