Interocular Suppression Research Articles

Binocular integration of chromatic and luminance signals.

Much progress has been made in understanding how the brain combines signals from the two eyes. However, most of this work has involved achromatic (black and white) stimuli, and it is not clear if the same processes apply in color-sensitive pathways. In our first experiment, we measured contrast discrimination ("dipper") functions for four key ocular configurations (monocular, binocular, half-binocular, and dichoptic), for achromatic, isoluminant L-M and isoluminant S-(L+M) sine-wave grating stimuli (L: long-, M: medium-, S: short-wavelength). We find a similar pattern of results across stimuli, implying equivalently strong interocular suppression within each pathway. Our second experiment measured dichoptic masking within and between pathways using the method of constant stimuli. Masking was strongest within-pathway and weakest between S-(L+M) and achromatic mechanisms. Finally, we repeated the dipper experiment using temporal luminance modulations, which produced slightly weaker interocular suppression than for spatially modulated stimuli. We interpret our results in the context of a contemporary two-stage model of binocular contrast gain control, implemented here using a hierarchical Bayesian framework. Posterior distributions of the weight of interocular suppression overlapped with a value of 1 for all dipper data sets, and the model captured well the pattern of thresholds from all three experiments.

The neurochemistry of learning-driven sensory eye dominance plasticity

Abstract Sensory eye dominance (SED) refers to a functional asymmetry of the two eyes that is thought to result from the visual cortex assigning uneven weighting to the two eyes’ data. Dichoptic perceptual training has been shown to improve (reduce) SED in visually normal individuals, with behavioral improvements accompanied by alterations of neural responses in the primary visual cortex. The mechanisms underlying these learning-driven neural changes are not well understood. Here, using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, we determined how inhibitory mechanisms in the early visual cortex (EVC) govern SED plasticity by measuring γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentration changes before and after perceptual training. Fifty normal-sighted observers were trained on a dichoptic or binocular variant of a signal-in-noise (left–right) motion discrimination task. We observed significant shifts in SED following dichoptic (but not binocular) training. Before training, both groups exhibited lower GABA concentrations in the EVC when signals were presented to the dominant eye. Only after dichoptic training, GABA concentrations in the EVC increased during presentations of signals to the dominant eye and decreased during presentations of signals to the non-dominant eye. Our data suggest that dichoptic training drives changes in SED by promoting a rebalancing of interocular inhibition in the EVC.

SPEctacle Correction for the TReatment of Amblyopia (SPECTRA): study protocol for a prospective non-randomised interventional trial in adults with anisometropic/mixed mechanism amblyopia

IntroductionAmblyopia is a neurodevelopmental vision disorder typically affecting one eye, resulting in compromised binocular function. While evidence-based treatments exist for children, there are no widely accepted treatments for adults. This...

Quantitative comparison of binocular suppression of patients with anisometropic amblyopia and ametropic amblyopia

Objective: To explore the differences in clinical characteristics and interocular interactions between patients with anisometropic amblyopia and ametropic amblyopia. Methods: Cross-sectional study. The newly diagnosed anisometropic (the binocular difference in spherical equivalent≥1.00 D) amblyopia patients and ametropic amblyopia patients (aged 4 to 6 years) in Beijing Tongren Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were involved. Patients were further categorized by the refractive status after cycloplegia, including hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism, hyperopia with astigmatism, myopia with astigmatism, mild anisometropia and severe anisometropia. Quantitative measurements of best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR), stereoacuity (transformed to log units), perceptual eye position and interocular suppression were performed, and the differences between groups were analyzed. The rank sum test was used for statistical evaluation. Results: The average age of 45 ametropic amblyopia patients (21 males and 24 females) and 84 anisometropic amblyopia patients (48 males and 36 females) was 5.0 (4.0, 5.0) years and 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) years, respectively. The interocular differences in spherical equivalent [2.56 (1.50, 4.19) D vs. 0.25 (0.13, 0.56) D] and best-corrected visual acuity [0.40 (0.18, 0.70) logMAR vs. 0.07 (0.00, 0.12) logMAR] were larger in patients with anisometropic amblyopia than those with ametropic amblyopia. The anisometropic amblyopia patients had worse stereoacuity [2.60 (2.00, 2.90) log arcsec vs. 2.00 (2.00, 2.30) log arcsec] and deeper suppression [20.0% (13.3%, 40.0%) vs. 10.0% (0, 23.3%)], compared with the ametropic amblyopia patients. The differences were all statistically significant (P<0.05). The suppression and stereoacuity between patients with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia [suppression, 30.0% (17.5%, 50.0%); stereoacuity, 2.90 (2.30, 2.90) log arcsec] and astigmatic anisometropic amblyopia [suppression, 10.0% (0, 20.0%); stereoacuity, 2.00 (2.00, 2.30) log arcsec] were significantly different (P<0.05). The differences of suppression and stereoacuity between patients with severe (binocular difference in spherical equivalent>2.50 D) [suppression, 30.0% (20.0%, 53.3%); stereoacuity, 2.90 (2.57, 2.90) log arcsec] and mild anisometropia [suppression, 20.0% (0, 30.0%); stereoacuity, 2.00 (2.00, 2.90) log arcsec] were also statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: Patients with anisometropic amblyopia have deeper binocular suppression, worse stereoacuity and more severe binocular interaction abnormality than those with ametropic amblyopia. The severity of anisometropia affects the degree of the interaction abnormality.

A new 'CFS tracking' paradigm reveals uniform suppression depth regardless of target complexity or salience.

When the eyes view separate and incompatible images, the brain suppresses one image and promotes the other into visual awareness. Periods of interocular suppression can be prolonged during continuous flash suppression (CFS) - when one eye views a static 'target' while the other views a complex dynamic stimulus. Measuring the time needed for a suppressed image to break CFS (bCFS) has been widely used to investigate unconscious processing, and the results have generated controversy regarding the scope of visual processing without awareness. Here, we address this controversy with a new 'CFS tracking' paradigm (tCFS) in which the suppressed monocular target steadily increases in contrast until breaking into awareness (as in bCFS) after which it decreases until it again disappears (reCFS), with this cycle continuing for many reversals. Unlike bCFS, tCFS provides a measure of suppression depth by quantifying the difference between breakthrough and suppression thresholds. tCFS confirms that (i) breakthrough thresholds indeed differ across target types (e.g. faces vs gratings, as bCFS has shown) - but (ii) suppression depth does not vary across target types. Once the breakthrough contrast is reached for a given stimulus, all stimuli require a strikingly uniform reduction in contrast to reach the corresponding suppression threshold. This uniform suppression depth points to a single mechanism of CFS suppression, one that likely occurs early in visual processing because suppression depth was not modulated by target salience or complexity. More fundamentally, it shows that variations in bCFS thresholds alone are insufficient for inferring whether the barrier to achieving awareness exerted by interocular suppression is weaker for some categories of visual stimuli compared to others.

A new ‘CFS tracking’ paradigm reveals uniform suppression depth regardless of target complexity or salience

When the eyes view separate and incompatible images, the brain suppresses one image and promotes the other into visual awareness. Periods of interocular suppression can be prolonged during continuous flash suppression (CFS) – when one eye views a static ‘target’ while the other views a complex dynamic stimulus. Measuring the time needed for a suppressed image to break CFS (bCFS) has been widely used to investigate unconscious processing, and the results have generated controversy regarding the scope of visual processing without awareness. Here, we address this controversy with a new ‘CFS tracking’ paradigm (tCFS) in which the suppressed monocular target steadily increases in contrast until breaking into awareness (as in bCFS) after which it decreases until it again disappears (reCFS), with this cycle continuing for many reversals. Unlike bCFS, tCFS provides a measure of suppression depth by quantifying the difference between breakthrough and suppression thresholds. tCFS confirms that (i) breakthrough thresholds indeed differ across target types (e.g. faces vs gratings, as bCFS has shown) – but (ii) suppression depth does not vary across target types. Once the breakthrough contrast is reached for a given stimulus, all stimuli require a strikingly uniform reduction in contrast to reach the corresponding suppression threshold. This uniform suppression depth points to a single mechanism of CFS suppression, one that likely occurs early in visual processing because suppression depth was not modulated by target salience or complexity. More fundamentally, it shows that variations in bCFS thresholds alone are insufficient for inferring whether the barrier to achieving awareness exerted by interocular suppression is weaker for some categories of visual stimuli compared to others.

Peripheral Binocular Imbalance in Anisometropic and Strabismic Amblyopia.

Individuals with amblyopia experience central vision deficits, including loss of visual acuity, binocular vision, and stereopsis. In this study, we examine the differences in peripheral binocular imbalance in children with anisometropic amblyopia, strabismic amblyopia, and typical binocular vision to determine if there are systematic patterns of deficits across the visual field. This prospective cohort study recruited 12 participants with anisometropic amblyopia, 10 with strabismic amblyopia, and 10 typically sighted controls (age range, 5-18years). Binocular imbalance was tested at 0°, 4°, and 8° eccentricities (4 angular locations each) using band-pass filtered Auckland optotypes (5 cycles per optotype) dichoptically presented with differing contrast to each eye. The interocular contrast ratio was adjusted until the participant reported each optotype with equal frequency. Participants with anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia had a more balanced contrast ratio, or decreased binocular imbalance, at 4° and 8° eccentricities as compared with central vision. Participants with strabismic amblyopia had significantly more binocular imbalance in the periphery as compared with individuals with anisometropic amblyopia or controls. A linear mixed effects model showed a main effect for strabismic amblyopia and eccentricity on binocular imbalance across the visual field. There is evidence of decreased binocularity deficits, or interocular suppression, in the periphery in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia as compared with controls. Notably, those with strabismic amblyopia exhibited more significant peripheral binocular imbalance. These variations in binocularity across the visual field among different amblyopia subtypes may necessitate tailored approaches for dichoptic treatment.

Ocular dominance-dependent binocular combination of monocular neuronal responses in macaque V1

Primates rely on two eyes to perceive depth, while maintaining stable vision when either one eye or both eyes are open. Although psychophysical and modeling studies have investigated how monocular signals are combined to form binocular vision, the underlying neuronal mechanisms, particularly in V1 where most neurons exhibit binocularity with varying eye preferences, remain poorly understood. Here, we used two-photon calcium imaging to compare the monocular and binocular responses of thousands of simultaneously recorded V1 superficial-layer neurons in three awake macaques. During monocular stimulation, neurons preferring the stimulated eye exhibited significantly stronger responses compared to those preferring both eyes. However, during binocular stimulation, the responses of neurons preferring either eye were suppressed on the average, while those preferring both eyes were enhanced, resulting in similar neuronal responses irrespective of their eye preferences, and an overall response level similar to that with monocular viewing. A neuronally realistic model of binocular combination, which incorporates ocular dominance-dependent divisive interocular inhibition and binocular summation, is proposed to account for these findings.

Ocular dominance-dependent binocular combination of monocular neuronal responses in macaque V1.

Primates rely on two eyes to perceive depth, while maintaining stable vision when either one eye or both eyes are open. Although psychophysical and modeling studies have investigated how monocular signals are combined to form binocular vision, the underlying neuronal mechanisms, particularly in V1 where most neurons exhibit binocularity with varying eye preferences, remain poorly understood. Here, we used two-photon calcium imaging to compare the monocular and binocular responses of thousands of simultaneously recorded V1 superficial-layer neurons in three awake macaques. During monocular stimulation, neurons preferring the stimulated eye exhibited significantly stronger responses compared to those preferring both eyes. However, during binocular stimulation, the responses of neurons preferring either eye were suppressed on the average, while those preferring both eyes were enhanced, resulting in similar neuronal responses irrespective of their eye preferences, and an overall response level similar to that with monocular viewing. A neuronally realistic model of binocular combination, which incorporates ocular dominance-dependent divisive interocular inhibition and binocular summation, is proposed to account for these findings.

Multifaceted Interactions of Stereoacuity, Inter-Ocular Suppression, and Fixation Eye Movement Abnormalities in Amblyopia and Strabismus.

Amblyopic and strabismus subjects experience inter-ocular suppression, impaired stereoacuity, and increased fixation instability. The purpose of the study was to investigate factors affecting suppression and stereoacuity and examine their relationship to fixation eye movement (FEM) abnormalities. We recruited 14 controls and 46 amblyopic subjects (anisometropic = 18, strabismic = 14, and mixed = 14) and 11 subjects with strabismus without amblyopia. We utilized the dichoptic motion coherence test to quantify suppression, and stereoacuity was assessed using the Titmus Fly test. We recorded FEMs using high-resolution video-oculography and classified subjects that did not have nystagmus (n = 27) versus those with nystagmus (n = 32; fusion maldevelopment nystagmus [FMN], n = 10) and nystagmus that did not meet the criteria of FMN (n = 20). We also recorded FEMs under dichoptic viewing (DcV) at varied fellow eye (FE) contrasts and computed the amplitude and velocity of the fast and slow FEMs and vergence instability. Inter-ocular suppression and stereoacuity deficits were closely correlated with an amblyopic eye (AE), visual acuity, and strabismus angle. Subjects with nystagmus displayed more pronounced stereoacuity deficits than those without nystagmus. Strabismic subjects with and without amblyopia, who demonstrated a fixation switch at 100% FE contrast, had lower inter-ocular suppression than subjects lacking a fixation switch under DcV. Amplitude of fast FEMs and velocity of slow FEMs, and vergence instability were increased as the FE contrast was lowered in both amblyopic and strabismic subjects. The current study highlights the intricate relationships between AE visual acuity, eye deviation, and FEM abnormalities on suppression and stereoacuity deficits and underscores the need to evaluate FEM abnormalities while assessing dichoptic treatment outcomes.

Binocular function in the aging visual system: fusion, suppression, and stereoacuity.

Changes in vision that occur in normal healthy aging can be seen in fundamental measures of monocular vision. However, the nature of the changes in binocular vision with age remain unclear. A total of 28 older (53-66 years) and 28 younger adults (20-31 years) were enrolled in this study. We performed a battery of tests to assess differences in monocular contrast thresholds and various binocular visual functions including dichoptic masking weight and strength, the binocular balance point for fused stimuli, and stereoacuity in the aging and control groups. Aging significantly increased monocular contrast thresholds (p < 0.001). Although this suggests that aging reduces the effective "input gain" to vision, we also found a significantly elevated contribution of those weaker signals to interocular suppression (p < 0.001). Consequently, there was no significant net difference in the strength of interocular suppression (p = 0.065). We did not find a significant difference of absolute balance point between the two groups (p = 0.090). Lastly, the mean stereoacuity was worse in the older group compared to the younger group (p = 0.002). Our findings confirm previous results showing differences in contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity with aging. Furthermore, we find a change in interocular suppression that is a possible consequence of the change in contrast sensitivity. It is suggestive of a cortical system that maintains a homeostatic balance in interocular suppression across the lifespan.

Flash Suppression Reveals an Additional Nonvisual Extrastriate Contribution for Amblyopic Suppression.

A growing body of evidence suggests that anomalous binocular interactions underlie the deficits in amblyopia, but their nature and neural basis are still not fully understood. We examined the behavioral and neural correlates of interocular suppression in 13 adult amblyopes and 13 matched controls using a flash suppression paradigm while recording steady-state visual evoked potentials. The strength of suppression was manipulated by changing the contrast (10%, 20%, 30%, or 100%) of the flash stimulus, or the suppressor, presented either in the dominant (fellow) or nondominant (amblyopic) eye. At the behavioral level, interocular suppression in normal observers was found, regardless of the eye origin of the flash onset. However, the pattern of suppression in the amblyopes was not symmetric, meaning that the suppression from the dominant eye was stronger, supporting a putative chronic suppression of the amblyopic eye. Interestingly, the amblyopic eye was able to suppress the dominant eye but only at the highest contrast level. At the electrophysiology level, suppression of the steady-state visual evoked potential responses in both groups in all conditions was similar over the occipital region, but differed over the frontal region. Our findings suggest that, although suppression in amblyopia involves an imbalanced interaction between the inputs to the two eyes in the visual cortex, there is also involvement of nonvisual extrastriate areas.

Effects of binocular disparity on binocular luminance combination.

This study aimed to examine the effects of binocular disparity on binocular combination of brightness information coming from luminance increments and decrements. The point of subjective equality was determined by asking the observers to judge which stimulus appeared brighter-a bar stimulus with variable disparity or another stimulus with zero disparity. For the bar stimulus, the interocular luminance ratio was varied to trace an equal brightness curve. Binocular disparity had no effect on luminance increments presented on a gray or black background. In contrast, when luminance decrements were presented on a gray background, non-zero disparities elevated points of subjective equality for stimuli with interocular luminance differences. This means that the binocular brightness combination of the two monocular signals shifted from winner-take-all summation toward linear averaging. It has been argued that this effect may be caused by non-zero binocular disparities attenuating interocular suppression, which is deemed to operate normally with zero disparity.

Current Developments in the Management of Amblyopia with the Use of Perceptual Learning Techniques.

Background and Objectives: Amblyopia is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by interocular suppression of visual input, affecting visual acuity, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity, and other visual functions. Conventional treatment comprises occlusion of the sound eye. In recent years, novel therapies that deploy perceptual learning (PL) principles have been introduced. The purpose of this study is to assess the latest scientific data on this topic. Materials and Methods: For this purpose, we conducted a literature search for relevant studies published during the previous 4 years (2020-2023). Results: A plethora of visual perceptual learning protocols have been recently developed. Dichoptic video games, contrast rebalanced movies, and online perceptual training platforms are the main formats. Perceptual learning activates neuroplasticity, overcomes interocular suppression, and improves the visual impairments induced by amblyopia. Conclusions: This novel treatment is effective in both children and adults, as well as in patients non-responding to patching.

A new approach to measure interocular suppression in amblyopia and strabismus

Interocular suppression is commonly estimated by the contrast “balance point” between the eyes in individuals with amblyopia, in which the depth of suppression is defined as the increased contrast in the amblyopic eye that is perceptually matched to the fellow eye. However, this method may not be suitable for individuals with strabismus who have normal or even better contrast sensitivity in the non-fixating eye. In this study, I introduced a new approach that can be used for measuring interocular suppression for both amblyopia and strabismus without balancing contrasts between the eyes. The method consists of the following components:•The stimuli have equal contrasts in both eyes.•The percepts of objects seen monocularly and binocularly are compared.•Interocular suppression is defined as the percept of object in the amblyopic eye is suppressed when an object is presented in the fellow eye.

Reduced interocular suppression after inverse patching in anisometropic amblyopia.

Recent investigations observed substantial enhancements in binocular balance, visual acuity, and stereovision among older children and adults with amblyopia by patching the amblyopic eye (i.e., inverse patching) for 2 h daily over 2 months. Despite these promising findings, the precise neural mechanisms underlying inverse patching remain elusive. This study endeavors to delve deeper into the neural alterations induced by inverse patching, focusing on steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). We specifically investigate the changes in SSVEPs following monocular deprivation of either the fellow eye or the amblyopic eye in older amblyopic children and adults. Ten participants (17.60 ± 2.03 years old; mean ± SEM), clinically diagnosed with anisometropic amblyopia, were recruited for this study. Each participant underwent a 120 min patching session on their fellow eye on the first day, followed by a similar session on their amblyopic eye on the second day. Baseline steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) measurements were collected each day prior to patching, with post-patching SSVEPs measurements obtained immediately after the patching session. The experimental design incorporated a binocular rivalry paradigm, utilizing SSVEPs measurements. The results revealed that inverse patching induced a heightened influence on neural plasticity, manifesting in a reduction of interocular suppression from the fellow eye to the amblyopic eye. In contrast, patching the fellow eye demonstrated negligible effects on the visual cortex. Furthermore, alterations in interocular suppression subsequent to inverse patching exhibited a correlation with the visual acuity of the amblyopic eye. Inverse patching emerges as a promising therapeutic avenue for adolescents and adults grappling with severe anisometropic amblyopia that proves refractory to conventional interventions. This innovative approach exhibits the potential to induce more robust neural plasticity within the visual cortex, thereby modulating neural interactions more effectively than traditional amblyopia treatments.

Invited Session V: Binocular vision and interactions: Harnessing interactions within binocular vision to treat amblyopia.

Inexpensive virtual reality (VR) headsets have enabled at-home therapy for binocular dysfunctions, including amblyopia. Healthy binocular vision is exquisite, which is achieved though interactions among various visual subsystems. As a result, however, binocular vision has multiple points of weakness, so development can go wrong in many different ways. Furthermore, the visual system has many ways it can adapt to dysfunctions to improve vision. It is therefore not surprising that amblyopias are idiosyncratic from one person to the next. Habitual interocular suppression is a typical adaption in amblyopia, and by treating suppression in VR, acuity can be improved by 0.1 to 0.2 logMAR. However, the amblyopic visual system shows complicated patterns of interaction between suppression, acuity, stereopsis, motor vergence, accommodation, and motion perception; and each of those subsystems is itself complex. Thus, to improve acuity and stereopsis in amblyopia, a multifaceted approach would seem more promising. In a VR headset, one can addresses suppression, stereopsis, vergence ability, and even accommodation, simultaneously. I will describe Vivid Vision's approach to this problem, along with preliminary results from independent researchers.

Contributed Session II: Binocular combination of the pupil response depends on photoreceptor pathway.

The pupillary light response is driven by three classes of retinal photoreceptor. Cones and rods are involved in the initial constriction of the pupil, whereas melanopsin-containing intrinsically photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells (ipRGCs) maintain constriction over longer timescales. Previous work has characterized the contributions of photoreceptor signals to pupil control, but relatively little is known about binocular combination of these signals when simultaneously stimulating the retina in both eyes. We measured changes in pupil size in 48 participants using a binocular eye-tracker, targeting specific photoreceptor classes with a binocular 10-primary light engine and the silent substitution method. We stimulated the periphery of the retina using light flickering at 0.4 and 0.5 Hz. Participants viewed a disc of either achromatic flickering light, or contrast modulations that targeted the ipRGCs, or the opponent colour pathways L-M or S-(L+M). Using a modified virtual reality headset, we presented the stimuli at a range of modulation amplitudes in three different ocular configurations: monocular, binocular, and dichoptic. We obtained clear pupil responses at both the first and the second harmonic frequencies. Suppression levels differed across conditions with the strongest suppression measured for the L-M condition. We account for the results in a single modelling framework where the weight of interocular suppression determines the binocular combination properties.

Poster Session II: SSVEP measurements of color and spatial frequency response in V1.

Recent work from our group (Segala et al, eLife, 2023) shows that the rules for binocular luminance signal combination depend on spatial frequency (SF). Structured patterns show strong interocular suppression while unstructured inputs (mean field disks) do not. Here, we used SSVEPs to ask if SF dependence is also found in chromatic pathways. SSVEPs were recorded from 12 subjects using a canonical V1 template (Poncet & Ales, 2023). Eyes were targeted using shutter goggles and stimuli were contrast-reversing gratings or disks at 5Hz (left eye) and 7Hz (right eye). Experimental factors were stimulus SF (disk, grating 1cpd), chromaticity (LMS, L-M or S-cone isolating) and ocularity (left, right or both). Monocular conditions generated large responses at 2F. In binocular conditions, all 2F responses showed suppression, and significant intermodulation (IM) terms (sums and differences of the inputs - e.g., 2Hz) were present. The magnitude of both suppression and IM in the binocular condition depended on SF and chromaticity; IM amplitudes were higher for gratings compared to disks in the luminance condition, but higher for disks compared to gratings in the chromatic conditions. Overall we found significant differences in the spectral response signatures across all stimulus combinations. All inputs undergo binocular combination in V1 but the rules governing the combination appear to depend on both chromaticity and SF.

Assessing the influence of emotional expressions on perceptual sensitivity to faces overcoming interocular suppression.

Detecting faces and identifying their emotional expressions are essential for social interaction. The importance of expressions has prompted suggestions that some emotionally relevant facial features may be processed unconsciously, and it has been further suggested that this unconscious processing yields preferential access to awareness. Evidence for such preferential access has predominantly come from reaction times in the breaking continuous flash suppression (bCFS) paradigm, which measures how long it takes different stimuli to overcome interocular suppression. For instance, it has been claimed that fearful expressions break through suppression faster than neutral expressions. However, in the bCFS procedure, observers can decide how much information they receive before committing to a report, so although their responses may reflect differential detection sensitivity, they may also be influenced by differences in decision criteria, stimulus identification, and response production processes. Here, we employ a procedure that directly measures sensitivity for both face detection and identification of facial expressions, using predefined exposure durations. We apply diverse psychophysical approaches-forced-choice localization, presence/absence detection, and staircase-based threshold measurement; across six experiments, we find that emotional expressions do not alter detection sensitivity to faces as they break through CFS. Our findings constrain the possible mechanisms underlying previous findings: faster reporting of emotional expressions' breakthrough into awareness is unlikely to be due to the presence of emotion affecting perceptual sensitivity; the source of such effects is likely to reside in one of the many other processes that influence response times. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).