Interoceptive Stimulus Effects Research Articles

MGlu2 and mGlu3 receptor negative allosteric modulators attenuate the interoceptive effects of alcohol in male and female rats

RationaleThe subjective effects of alcohol are associated with alcohol use disorder (AUD) vulnerability and treatment outcomes. The interoceptive effects of alcohol are part of these subjective effects and can be measured in animal models using drug discrimination procedures. The newly developed mGlu2 and mGlu3 negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) are potential therapeutics for AUD and may alter interoceptive sensitivity to alcohol. ObjectivesTo determine the effects of mGlu2 and mGlu3 NAMs on the interoceptive effects of alcohol in rats. MethodsLong-Evans rats were trained to discriminate the interoceptive stimulus effects of alcohol (2.0 g/kg, i.g.) from water using both operant (males only) and Pavlovian (male and female) drug discrimination techniques. Following acquisition training, an alcohol dose-response (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 g/kg) experiment was conducted to confirm stimulus control over behavior. Next, to test the involvement of mGlu2 and mGlu3, rats were pretreated with the mGlu2-NAM (VU6001966; 0, 3, 6, 12 mg/kg, i.p.) or the mGlu3-NAM (VU6010572; 0, 3, 6, 12 mg/kg, i.p.) before alcohol administration (2.0 g/kg, i.g.). ResultsIn Pavlovian discrimination, male rats showed greater interoceptive sensitivity to 1.0 and 2.0 g/kg alcohol compared to female rats. Both mGlu2-NAM and mGlu3-NAM attenuated the interoceptive effects of alcohol in male and female rats using Pavlovian and operant discrimination. There may be a potential sex difference in response to the mGlu2-NAM at the highest dose tested. ConclusionsMale rats may be more sensitive to the interoceptive effects of the 2.0 g/kg alcohol training dose compared to female rats. Both mGlu2-and mGlu3-NAM attenuate the interoceptive effects of alcohol in male and female rats. These drugs may have potential for treatment of AUD in part by blunting the subjective effects of alcohol.

Varenicline serves as the training stimulus in the drug-discriminated goal-tracking task with rats: initial evaluation of potential neuropharmacological processes.

Varenicline (Chantix) is an FDA-approved smoking cessation aid that is pharmacologically similar to nicotine, the primary addictive component found within tobacco. In support of this similarity, previous drug discrimination research in rats has reported that the internal or interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine and varenicline share stimulus elements. Those shared elements appear to be mediated, in part, by overlapping action at alpha4beta2-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). The research supporting this conclusion, however, has only used nicotine, and not varenicline, as the training drug. Accordingly, we used the discriminated goal tracking (DGT) task in which 1 mg/kg varenicline signaled intermittent access to sucrose. On separate intermixed saline days, sucrose was not available. Rats acquired the discrimination as measured by a differential increase in dipper entries (goal tracking) evoked by varenicline. These rats then received a series of tests with several doses of varenicline, nicotine, nornicotine (a metabolite of nicotine and tobacco alkaloid), sazetidine-A (a partial alpha4beta2 agonist), PHA-543613 (an alpha7 agonist), and bupropion (a norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor). Control of goal tracking by varenicline was dose-dependent. Nicotine and nornicotine evoked responding comparable to the varenicline training dose indicating full substitution. Sazetidine-A partially substituted for the varenicline stimulus, whereas bupropion and PHA-543613 evoked little to no varenicline-like responding. These findings indicate that varenicline can serve as the training stimulus in the DGT task. Further, stimulus control of varenicline in the DGT task is driven by its partial agonist activity at alpha4beta2-containing nAChRs. The use of this approach could lead to a better understanding of the pharmacological action of varenicline and help guide treatment geared towards tobacco cessation through a more targeted development of novel synthetically designed, subunit-specific pharmacological interventions.

Using complex behavior to understand brain mechanisms in health and disease.

Using complex behavior to understand brain mechanisms in health and disease.

Appetitive Pavlovian conditioning of the stimulus effects of nicotine enhances later nicotine self-administration.

Nicotine produces robust stimulus effects that can be conditioned to exert stimulus control over behavior through associative learning. Additionally, nicotine has weak reinforcing effects that are inconsistent with its prevalence of use and the tenacity of nicotine dependence. The present study investigated whether conditioned associations to the nicotine drug stimulus may confer additional reinforcing strength to nicotine that thereby increase its use liability, and presents a new methodological approach to investigating the interaction between the stimulus effects and reinforcing effects of drugs. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into groups receiving intravenous infusions of either 0.03 mg/kg nicotine or 0.9% saline that were either Paired (30 s delayed) or explicitly Unpaired (4 to 6 min delayed) with sucrose deliveries over 24 daily conditioning sessions. Thereafter, recessed nosepoke response devices were installed in the chambers and infusions of their assigned drug solutions were contingently available according to a progressive ratio schedule. Rats in the Paired Nicotine condition acquired the nosepoke response, expressed active nosepoke discrimination, and self-administered significantly more infusions than rats in any of the other groups. These results demonstrate that the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine can form Pavlovian associations with reinforcing events that alter its reinforcement efficacy.

Understanding the stimulus effects of nicotine and bupropion in a drug-drug discriminated goal-tracking task.

Bupropion is a non-nicotine medication for smoking cessation that has overlapping stimulus effects with nicotine as demonstrated in drug discrimination studies. Whether these shared stimulus effects will alter acquisition or maintenance of a discrimination between nicotine and bupropion is unknown. We sought to test this possibility using the drug discriminated goal-tracking (DGT) task and whether discrimination training history affected generalization and substitution tests. Sixty adult Sprague-Dawley rats (30M/30F) were equally split into three discrimination training groups: SAL-0.4NIC, 10BUP-0.4NIC, and 20BUP-0.4NIC. On nicotine days, all rats were administered subcutaneously 0.4mg/kg nicotine and had intermittent access to liquid sucrose. On intermixed non-reinforced days, rats were administered intraperitoneally saline, 10 or 20mg/kg bupropion. Upon completion, a range of nicotine and bupropion doses were assessed before substitution tests with varenicline and sazetidine-A were conducted. The SAL-0.4NIC and 10BUP-0.4NIC groups readily discriminated by session 8, as evidenced by increased dipper entries (goal-tracking) on nicotine days. The 20BUP-0.4NIC group was slower to acquire the discrimination. Female rats, regardless of group, had higher conditioned responding evoked by the lowest dose of nicotine (0.025mg/kg) in the dose-effect curve. The discrimination required rats to learn to withhold responding to the training dose of bupropion. This withholding of excitatory dipper entries generalized to other doses. Varenicline and sazetidine-A partially substituted for the nicotine stimulus, and this pattern did not differ with training history. We are the first to study a drug-drug discrimination using the DGT task. Females appeared to have a lower discrimination threshold for nicotine that was not impacted by the learning history. Further work on the importance of sex as a biological variable and how the complex interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine can vary with training histories is needed.

Characterization of 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone discrimination in female Sprague-Dawley rats.

3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), one of several synthetic cathinones, is a popular constituent of illicit 'bath salts'. In preclinical studies utilizing drug discrimination methods with male rodents, MDPV has been characterized as similar to both cocaine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-hydrochloride (MDMA). Whereas few drug discrimination studies have utilized female rats, the current study evaluated the discriminative stimulus effects of MDPV in 12 adult female Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate 0.5 mg/kg MDPV from saline under a fixed ratio 20 schedule of food reinforcement. Stimulus substitution was assessed with MDPV and its enantiomers, other synthetic cathinones [alpha pyrrolidinopentiophenone-hydrochloride(α-PVP), 4-methylmethcathinone (4-MMC)], other dopamine agonists (cocaine, [+)-methamphetamine] and serotonin agonists [MDMA, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)] Stimulus antagonism was assessed with the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, Sch 23390 and the D2 receptor antagonist, haloperidol. Cocaine and (+)-methamphetamine engendered full stimulus generalization to MDPV with minimal effects on response rate. LSD produced partial substitution, whereas MDMA and 4-MMC produced complete substitution, and all these serotonergic compounds produced dose-dependent response suppression. (S)-MDPV and α-PVP engendered full substitution with similar potency to the racemate, while (R)-MDPV failed to substitute up to 5 mg/kg. Both Sch 23390 and haloperidol attenuated the discrimination of low MDPV doses and essentially shifted the dose-response curve to the right but failed to block discrimination of the training dose. These findings are generally consistent with previous reports based exclusively on male rodents. Moreover, they confirm the contribution of dopaminergic mechanisms but do not rule out the possible contribution of other neurotransmitter actions to the interoceptive stimulus effects of MDPV.

Menthol blunts the interoceptive discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in female but not male rats.

Menthol is a widely used tobacco constituent that has shown to enhance nicotine's reinforcing effects. To determine whether injected menthol also alters nicotine's stimulus effects, we used a drug discrimination task. A total of 57 adult Sprague-Dawley rats (28M, 29F) received 20 positive and 20 negative days (intermixed) of discrimination training. On positive days, rats received a group-specific menthol and nicotine injection (VEH + 0.1 NIC, 1 M + 0.1 NIC, 5 M + 0.1 NIC, VEH + 0.4 NIC, 1 M + 0.4 NIC, 5 M + 0.4 NIC; mg/kg) before eight 15-s cue light presentations (conditioned stimulus (CS)), each followed by 4-s sucrose access. On negative days, all rats were injected with vehicle and saline before eight non-reinforced CS presentations. Next, rats underwent generalization testing with 30 dose combinations of menthol and nicotine. The change in drug-mediated anticipatory goal tracking during the CS was calculated as a difference score (CS minus pre-CS responding). All groups readily acquired drug discrimination. However, difference scores for the 5M + 0.1 NIC group were lower for females. Additionally, females had lower scores for 0.05, 0.1, and 0.4 mg/kg nicotine generalization tests. The lowest nicotine dose discriminable from saline was 0.05 mg/kg for females but 0.025 mg/kg for males. Co-administration with 5 or 10 mg/kg menthol weakened discrimination performance between 0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg and between 0.1 and 0.05 mg/kg nicotine for 0.1 mg/kg nicotine training groups. Female rats that were trained with 0.1 mg/kg nicotine were more sensitive to menthol's modulatory effects on nicotine's stimulus effects. This highlights the importance of taking sex and training dose into account when evaluating the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine and menthol.

Investigating the interoceptive stimulus effects of injected menthol in rats.

Menthol is a commonly used tobacco constituent that also modulates nicotine reinforcement and metabolism. Little is known about the stimulus effects of menthol that mediate the behavior associated with reinforcement-learning. Our present research explored the interoceptive stimulus effects of intraperitoneally administered menthol in a drug discrimination task. For Experiment 1, Sprague-Dawley rats (N = 20) received IP menthol (0.0183 or 5 mg/kg) or vehicle. For positive sessions, rats were given menthol before receiving 8 15-s light presentations, each followed by 4-s access to liquid sucrose. For intermixed negative sessions, rats were given vehicle before receiving 8 light presentations without sucrose delivery. After 32 sessions, rats previously receiving 0.0183 mg/kg menthol were switched to 15 mg/kg menthol. After 16 sessions, the injection-to-placement-interval was switched from 5 min to 15 min for 16 additional sessions. Lastly, a subset of rats (n = 10) received nicotine discrimination training for 40 sessions, with 0.4 mg/kg nicotine pretreatment on positive days and saline on negative days. In Experiment 2, naïve rats (N = 7) received nicotine discrimination training. Later sessions assessed nicotine discrimination performance in combination with 5 mg/kg menthol or vehicle. Menthol-vehicle discrimination was not evident regardless of dose or injection-to-placement interval in Experiment 1. However, rats that underwent nicotine training developed robust drug discrimination. In Experiment 2, co-exposure with menthol or vehicle did not modulate nicotine discrimination performance. These data suggest that menthol does not acquire control of responding in a drug discrimination task. Additional research is needed to further explore the interoceptive stimulus effects of menthol and nicotine combined. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Exploring the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine and varenicline

Learning processes associated with nicotine influence the development of addiction to tobacco products. In the present report, we are interested in the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine acquiring control over appetitive behaviors – specifically, reward seeking. Also of interest is the current smoking cessation drug, varenicline (Chantix®). Varenicline, with its nicotine-like stimulus effects, can decrease withdrawal and cravings for a subset of individuals addicted to nicotine, though relapse is still common. We trained rats (N = 48) with nicotine (0.4 mg/kg, SC) as an excitatory stimulus (i.e., paired with sucrose) in a drug-discriminated goal-tracking (DGT) task. There was no access to sucrose on interspersed saline days. After acquisition of the initial nicotine-saline discrimination, rats were separated into four groups to test discrimination reversal and drug substitution. The control group maintained nicotine as the excitatory stimulus (NIC+). The substitution group had varenicline (1 mg/kg) replace nicotine as the stimulus paired with sucrose (VAR+). One reversal group had nicotine signal the absence of sucrose (i.e., now available on intermixed saline sessions; NIC−). The last group was similar to the NIC− group except varenicline replaced nicotine on non-reinforced sessions (VAR−). We found that varenicline fully substituted as the training stimulus when the drug-sucrose relation remained in place (VAR+). Both reversal groups acquired the new discrimination, albeit slowly and more variable for the VAR− group in comparison to NIC−. There was an effect of group during substitution testing. Specifically, nicotine fully substituted for varenicline regardless of condition. However, varenicline only partially substituted for the nicotine stimulus. At the start of extinction, responding mimicked that of the rats training condition. However, by extinction session 12, all groups maintained similarly low levels of responding. These findings show nicotine and varenicline share stimulus elements, yet the conclusion of partial to full substitution depends on the nature of the testing protocol.

Discriminative stimulus effects of mecamylamine and nicotine in rhesus monkeys: Central and peripheral mechanisms

Mecamylamine is a non-competitive nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonist that has been prescribed for hypertension and as an off-label smoking cessation aid. Here, we examined pharmacological mechanisms underlying the interoceptive effects (i.e., discriminative stimulus effects) of mecamylamine (5.6 mg/kg s.c.) and compared the effects of nAChR antagonists in this discrimination assay to their capacity to block a nicotine discriminative stimulus (1.78 mg/kg s.c.) in rhesus monkeys. Central (pempidine) and peripherally restricted nAChR antagonists (pentolinium and chlorisondamine) dose-dependently substituted for the mecamylamine discriminative stimulus in the following rank order potency (pentolinium > pempidine > chlorisondamine > mecamylamine). In contrast, at equi-effective doses based on substitution for mecamylamine, only mecamylamine antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine, i.e., pentolinium, chlorisondamine, and pempidine did not. NMDA receptor antagonists produced dose-dependent substitution for mecamylamine with the following rank order potency (MK-801 > phencyclidine > ketamine). In contrast, behaviorally active doses of smoking cessation aids including nAChR agonists (nicotine, varenicline, and cytisine), the smoking cessation aid and antidepressant bupropion, and the benzodiazepine midazolam did not substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of mecamylamine. These data suggest that peripheral nAChRs and NMDA receptors may contribute to the interoceptive stimulus effects produced by mecamylamine. Based on the current results, the therapeutic use of mecamylamine (i.e., for smoking or to alleviate green tobacco sickness) should be weighed against the potential for mecamylamine to produce interoceptive effects that overlap with another class of abused drugs (i.e., NMDA receptor agonists).

Contribution of monoaminergic mechanisms to the discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) in Sprague-Dawley rats.

3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) is a popular synthetic cathinone reported to have a high abuse potential. Recent preclinical research indicates the psychopharmacology of MDPV is comparable to cocaine. Despite a recent influx of research on the psychopharmacology of MDPV, few studies have employed preclinical drug discrimination methods to discern the neurochemical mechanisms involved in its interoceptive stimulus effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate a variety of monoaminergic agents for substitution, potentiation, or antagonism in rats trained to discriminate MDPV. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate 0.5 (experiment 1) or 1mg/kg MDPV (experiment 2) from saline under an FR 20 schedule of food reinforcement. In experiment 1, MDMA, MDA, and their respective optical isomers (0.75-3mg/kg), cocaine (2.5-20mg/kg), GBR 12909 (5-40mg/kg), and desipramine (3.2-10mg/kg) were assessed for substitution. GBR 12909 (40mg/kg) and desipramine (3.2mg/kg) were subsequently assessed for potentiation of the MDPV cue. In experiment 2, stimulus antagonism tests were conducted with dopamine antagonists (Sch 23390, haloperidol) and serotonin antagonists (pirenperone, MDL100907, WAY 100635). The MDMA and MDA enantiomers produced divergent results, with virtually no substitution by (-)-MDMA or (-)-MDA, partial substitution with (+)-MDA, and full substitution with (+)-MDMA, as well as full substitution by the racemates, (±)-MDMA and (±)-MDA. Consistent with previous findings, cocaine fully substituted for MDPV. Although no dose of GBR 12909 or desipramine substituted for MDPV, these reuptake inhibitors enhanced the discriminative stimulus effects of lower MDPV doses. Both D1 (Sch 23390) and D2 (haloperidol) DA antagonists attenuated 1mg/kg MDPV discrimination, whereas none of the 5-HT antagonists assessed altered MDPV discrimination. These findings indicate MDPV's interoceptive stimulus effects are mediated predominantly by dopaminergic actions, although serotonergic and/or noradrenergic modulation of these effects cannot be ruled out. Further investigations into the neurochemical actions involved in the discriminative stimulus effects of MDPV may serve to inform medication discovery and development for the treatment of MDPV abuse.

Nicotine pre-treatment reduces sensitivity to the interoceptive stimulus effects of commonly abused drugs as assessed with taste conditioning paradigms

BackgroundDrug pre-exposure attenuates sensitivity to the interoceptive stimulus properties of additional subsequently administered drugs in drug-induced conditioned taste avoidance (CTA) and conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigms. Specifically, nicotine, commonly used in conjunction with other addictive substances, attenuates acquisition of ethanol and caffeine CTAs and morphine-induced CPP. MethodsBecause nicotine use is comorbid with a number of substance use disorders, we systematically examined the effects of nicotine pre-exposure on two different conditioning paradigms involving integration of the interoceptive stimulus properties of multiple commonly abused drugs, in male and female rats, designed to examine both the aversive and reinforcing properties of these drugs. ResultsNicotine dose-dependently interfered with acquisition of CTA to passively administered morphine, ethanol, and cocaine, but not lithium chloride, demonstrating that the effects of nicotine are not simply a matter of reduced orosensory processing or an inability to learn such associations. Moreover, nicotine-treated rats required higher doses of drug in order to develop CTA and did not show increased acceptance of the taste of self-administered ethanol compared with saline-treated rats. ConclusionsThese data demonstrate that nicotine pre-exposure attenuates sensitivity to the stimulus effects of multiple drugs in two conditioning paradigms, in a manner which is consistent with a reduced ability to integrate the interoceptive properties of abused drugs. Through reducing these stimulus properties of drugs of abuse, concomitant nicotine use may result in a need to increase either the frequency or strength of doses during drug-taking, thus likely contributing to enhanced addiction liability in smokers.

The DREADD agonist clozapine N-oxide (CNO) is reverse-metabolized to clozapine and produces clozapine-like interoceptive stimulus effects in rats and mice

Clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) has long been the ligand of choice for selectively activating Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs). However, recent studies have challenged the long-held assertion that CNO is otherwise pharmacologically inert. The present study aimed to 1) determine whether CNO is reverse-metabolized to its parent compound clozapine in mice (as has recently been reported in rats), and 2) determine whether CNO exerts clozapine-like interoceptive stimulus effects in rats and/or mice. Following administration of 10.0 mg/kg CNO, pharmacokinetic analyses replicated recent reports of back-conversion to clozapine in rats and revealed that this phenomenon also occurs in mice. In rats and mice trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg clozapine from vehicle, CNO (1.0–20.0 mg/kg) produced partial substitution for the clozapine stimulus on average, with full substitution being detected in some individual animals of both species at doses frequently used to activate DREADDs. The present demonstration that CNO is converted to clozapine and exerts clozapine-like behavioral effects in both mice and rats further emphasizes the need for appropriate control groups in studies employing DREADDs, and highlights the utility of the drug discrimination procedure as a tool with which to screen the off-target effects of novel DREADD agonists.

Evaluation of training dose in male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate 4-methylmethcathinone

Although the synthetic cathinone 4-methylmethcathinone (4-MMC, mephedrone) has been a subject of intensive research investigation, the pharmacological mechanisms involved in its interoceptive stimulus effects have yet to be fully characterized. The present study employed drug discrimination methods in rats to compare the interoceptive stimulus properties of two different training doses of 4-MMC to other substances with similar pharmacological actions. Sixteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate either 1.0mg/kg (N=8) or 3.0mg/kg (N=8) 4-MMC from saline. Substitution tests were conducted with drugs that increase extracellular monoamine levels (d-amphetamine, (+)-methamphetamine, 4-MMC, MDMA, MDPV, and (-)-cocaine), a serotonin releaser (+)-fenfluramine, and a serotonergic (5-HT2A) hallucinogen (+)-LSD. Stimulus control was established in fewer sessions in the subjects trained with 3.0mg/kg compared to those trained with 1.0mg/kg 4-MMC. Cocaine, MDMA, and d-amphetamine produced full substitution in the 1.0mg/kg 4-MMC-trained rats at doses that did not decrease response rate. However, doses of test drugs that engendered >80% 4-MMC-lever selection concurrently produced rate-decreasing effects in rats trained to discriminate 3.0mg/kg 4-MMC. These findings further characterize the interoceptive stimulus effects of 4-MMC and indicate that these effects vary little with training dose; however, qualitative differences in substitutability of test drugs were observed between training groups. This study expands existing knowledge regarding the psychopharmacology of 4-MMC and the potential neurochemical substrates contributing to its subjective effects.

Characterization of the discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone in male Sprague-Dawley rats.

Recreational use of 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) in the early 2000s prompted numerous scientific investigations of its behavioral and neurochemical effects. The purpose of this study was to further characterize the interoceptive stimulus effects of MDPV using a validated in-vivo drug-detection assay. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate 0.3 mg/kg MDPV from saline under a fixed ratio 20 (FR 20) schedule of food reinforcement. After stimulus control was established with MDPV (∼35 training sessions), substitution tests were commenced with drugs from several chemical classes, including drugs with predominantly dopaminergic actions [MDPV, D-amphetamine, (+)-methamphetamine, (-)-cocaine], drugs with predominantly serotonergic actions [(+)-lysergic acid diethylamide, (+)-fenfluramine], and drugs with both serotonergic and dopaminergic actions (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, 4-methylmethcathinone). Full substitution for the 0.3 mg/kg MDPV cue was observed with D-amphetamine, (+)-methamphetamine, and (-)-cocaine. Surprisingly, the 5-HT releaser (+)-fenfluramine fully substituted in half the subjects, but completely suppressed responding in the remaining subjects. 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, 4-methylmethcathinone, and (+)-lysergic acid diethylamide failed to fully substitute for MDPV. These results indicate that the MDPV cue is similar to cues produced by drugs with predominantly dopamine-increasing effects and perhaps serotonin-releasing effects among individual subjects. Given these findings, further research is warranted to directly assess the contributions of dopamine and serotonin receptor isoforms to the discriminative stimulus functions of MDPV.

Hallucinogens in Drug Discrimination.

Hallucinogens comprise a diverse collection of chemicals with multifarious receptor actions in the central nervous system. Preclinical drug screening methods have proven invaluable in the evaluation and characterization of hallucinogen psychopharmacology. Used in concert with structural chemistry and receptor pharmacology methods, preclinical drug discrimination research has informed our current understanding of hallucinogens and the neurochemical receptor mechanisms responsible for their interoceptive stimulus effects. This chapter summarizes the strengths and limitations of drug discrimination as an in vivo drug detection method and offers a brief review of historical and contemporary drug discrimination research with classical hallucinogens.

Assessing Discrimination of Nicotine in Humans Via Cigarette Smoking.

Nicotine's interoceptive stimulus effects likely help explain smoking's reinforcing efficacy, but human studies have been limited by difficulties controlling dosing via tobacco inhalation. Our objective was to describe a procedure to study nicotine discrimination via smoking. Dependent smokers abstinent overnight (>12 hours) were first "trained" to discriminate between two cigarettes differing in nicotine content, based on four puffs of exposure, and then tested on whether they successfully acquired that discrimination. After piloting with Quest brand commercial cigarettes, 29 subjects engaged in the main study with cigarettes available through NIDA (Spectrum; 16mg vs. 0.4mg nicotine content). Discrimination training first involved two trials, one with each cigarette, prior to six testing trials. Due to results with the first 20 subjects, the remaining nine received two training trials with each cigarette (four total). Subjective perceptions were also assessed during each testing trial, and puff choice between the two cigarettes available concurrently was assessed after testing, on the last two trials. All five pilot subjects successfully discriminated Quest 1 versus Quest 3 (defined by at least five out of six trials correct, ie, >80%). Yet, only 10 of 20 subjects (50%) were able to discriminate the two Spectrum cigarettes based on two training trials. After changing to four training trials, eight of nine subjects were able to discriminate (89%). Subjective perceptions and puff choice differed between cigarettes more in those able versus unable to discriminate them. With sufficient training exposures, smokers can discriminate nicotine between cigarettes differing in nicotine contents. The interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine are critical to understanding reinforcement from cigarette smoking behavior. Because of the very recent availability of Spectrum research cigarettes from NIDA, with specific known amounts of nicotine content, the study of nicotine discrimination in humans via cigarette smoking may now be feasible. Our results demonstrate that, with sufficient training, smokers can behaviorally discriminate nicotine from four puffs' exposure between cigarettes differing in nicotine contents. Future research should evaluate human discrimination of nicotine from greater amounts of cigarette smoke exposure, as well as in response to other procedural variations.

Interoceptive conditioning with nicotine using extinction and re-extinction to assess stimulus similarity with bupropion

Bupropion is an atypical antidepressant that increases long-term quit rates of tobacco smokers. A better understanding of the relation between nicotine and this first-line medication may provide insight into improving treatment. For all experiments, rats first had nicotine (0.4 mg base/kg) and saline session intermixed; intermittent access to sucrose only occurred on nicotine session. Nicotine in this protocol comes to differentially control “anticipatory” dipper entries. To more closely examine the overlap in the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine and bupropion, we assessed whether subsequent prolonged and repeated non-reinforced (extinction) sessions with the bupropion stimulus could weaken responding to nicotine (i.e., transfer of extinction). We also examined whether retraining the discrimination after initial extinction and then conducting extinction again (i.e., re-extinction) with bupropion would affect responding. We found that bupropion (20 and 30 mg/kg) fully substituted for the nicotine stimulus in repeated 20-min extinction sessions. The extent of substitution in extinction did not necessarily predict performance in the transfer test (e.g., nicotine responding unchanged after extinction with 20 mg/kg bupropion). Generalization of extinction back to nicotine was not seen with 20 mg/kg bupropion even after increasing the number of extinction session from 6 to 24. Finally, there was evidence that learning in the initial extinction phase was retained in the re-extinction phase for nicotine and bupropion. These findings indicate that learning involving the nicotine stimuli are complex and that assessment approach for stimulus similarity changes conclusions regarding substitution by bupropion. Further research will be needed to identify whether such differences may be related to different facets of nicotine dependence and/or its treatment.

Dopamine β-Hydroxylase Inhibitors Enhance the Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Cocaine in Rats

Inhibitors of dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH), the enzyme that converts dopamine (DA) to norepinephrine (NE) in noradrenergic cells, have shown promise for the treatment of cocaine abuse disorders. However, the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of these compounds have not been fully elucidated. We used the drug discrimination paradigm to determine the impact of DBH inhibitors on the interoceptive stimulus properties of cocaine. Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate cocaine (5.6 mg/kg) from saline using a multicomponent, food-reinforced discrimination procedure. On test days, subjects were pretreated with the nonselective DBH inhibitor disulfiram (0-100.0 mg/kg i.p.) or the selective DBH inhibitor nepicastat (0-56.0 mg/kg i.p.) 2 hours prior to a test session either alone or in combination with cumulatively administered cocaine (0-5.6 mg/kg i.p.). Neither disulfiram nor nepicastat substituted for the cocaine stimulus when tested up to doses that nonspecifically reduced responding. However, in combination studies, pretreatment with either disulfiram or nepicastat produced leftward shifts in the cocaine dose-response function and also conferred cocaine-like stimulus effects to the selective NE transporter inhibitor, reboxetine (0.3-5.6 mg/kg i.p.). These results indicate that pharmacological inhibition of DBH does not produce cocaine-like interoceptive stimulus effects alone, but functionally enhances the interoceptive stimulus effects of cocaine, possibly due to facilitated increases in DA released from noradrenergic terminals. These findings suggest that DBH inhibitors have low abuse liability and provide support to clinical reports that some subjective effects produced by cocaine, particularly aversive effects, are enhanced after DBH inhibition.

Interoceptive conditioning with a nicotine stimulus is susceptible to reinforcer devaluation.

Pavlovian conditioning processes contribute to the etiology of nicotine dependence. Conditioning involving interoceptive stimuli is increasingly recognized as playing a role in many diseases and psychopathologies, including drug addiction. Previous animal research on diminishing the influence of interoceptive conditioning has been limited to antagonism and nonreinforced exposures to the drug stimulus. The goal of the present research was to determine whether interoceptive conditioning with a nicotine stimulus could be diminished through an unconditioned stimulus (US) devaluation procedure. In two separate experiments, male Sprague-Dawley rats received nicotine injections (0.4 mg base/kg) followed by intermittent sucrose (26%) access in a conditioning chamber. On intermixed saline sessions, sucrose was withheld. Conditioning was demonstrated by a reliable increase in head entries in the dipper receptacle on nicotine versus saline sessions. After conditioning, rats in a devaluation condition were given access to sucrose in their home cages immediately followed by a lithium chloride (LiCl) injection on 3 consecutive days. On subsequent test days, nicotine-evoked conditioned responding was significantly attenuated. Within-subject (Experiment 1) and between-subjects (Experiment 2) controls revealed that the diminished responding was not attributable to mere exposure to the sucrose US in the devaluation phase. Experiment 2 included a LiCl-alone control group. Repeated illness induced by LiCl did not reduce later nicotine-evoked responding. These findings suggest that there is a direct association between the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine and the appetitive sucrose US (i.e., stimulus-stimulus) rather than a stimulus-response association.