The article studies the problems of legal characteristics of tax planning. It is emphasized that there is no single approach to determining the balance of private and public interests in the field of taxation. This especially concerns situations where taxpayers try to optimize tax payments in a way that does not involve a direct violation of the law, but has signs of abuse of the right, which is characteristic of an aggressive tax planning. It is argued that the solution to this problem is important, since abuse of rights by taxpayers, using the imperfections of legislation, manipulation of differences in tax regulations of different states, as well as active use of low-tax jurisdictions in business schemes leads to huge losses in the budgets of many countries. It is pointed out that aggressive tax planning is not direct violation of the law, otherwise such actions would be qualified as tax offense. The positions of scientists regarding the definition of such a category as “aggressive tax planning” are presented in the article, as well as the author's position on this issue is highlighted. It is noted that the widest toolkit of tax optimization can be used in the implementation of international tax planning. In the past, one of the main, most common and effective methods of aggressive tax planning was the use of low-tax jurisdictions. However, the influence of this factor has been efficiently reduced by modern trends to counteract this phenomenon, in particular, the widespread introduction of anti-BEPS measures and automatic exchange of tax information. Other common tools of aggressive tax planning are listed, including transfer pricing. The negative consequences of aggressive tax planning for the state are described, related to the reduction of tax revenues to the budget, as well as the creation of an anti-competitive environment due to receiving unfair tax advantages. The main methods of combating aggressive tax planning both at the international and domestic level are disclosed. The main signs of aggressive tax planning are identified and the conclusion is drawn that in each specific case, the behavior of the taxpayer, which has signs of aggressive tax planning, should be evaluated for the presence of abuse of the law, which will allow the application of appropriate legal consequences for the purpose of protecting state and public interests.
Read full abstract