Abstract The primary justification for universal jurisdiction (UJ) is its use as a tool to end impunity for certain international crimes. It is also linked to deterrence, as perpetrators of such crimes can face, and have indeed faced, legal action when they travel or reside overseas. Yet, UJ is also the subject of concerns, including the risk of politically motivated prosecutions and the undermining of fair trial rights and legal process. This article contends that the case for UJ can be strengthened, taking as its starting point scholarship that foregrounds the experiences of diaspora communities, rather than the traditional grounding of UJ in abstract appeals to shared humanity. Building on the insights that this earlier work enables us to uncover, this article seeks to reinforce the normative case for UJ by reframing it as international solidarity with survivors of atrocity crimes. First, international solidarity, as a unity of interests in accountability and effective remedies among survivors, other members of the diaspora, states, civil society and international organizations, underlines the connectedness among different actors that play a role in UJ. Secondly, uncovering such connectedness adds to the justifications for UJ the need to rebuild the trust of survivors in the (inter)national criminal justice system by underlining shared interests in access to justice. This is particularly timely in the context of Afghanistan, where survivors are often left without recourse to effective remedies for past and ongoing atrocities. In building the case for UJ from a solidarity perspective, the article incorporates lessons from a project the author is involved in concerning the potential of UJ for holding members of the Taliban accountable for atrocity crimes; a collective effort commissioned by diaspora from Afghanistan. It contributes to this project by strengthening the call for survivors to form a central part of accountability efforts across the world.
Read full abstract