International Society Of Ultrasound In Obstetrics And Gynecology Research Articles

Current status of ultrasound training in obstetrics and gynecology: a scoping literature review

IntroductionAs a widely accessible, cost-effective, and safe imaging tool, obstetric and gynecologic (OB/GYN) ultrasound (ULS) plays a vital role in diagnostics and patient care. With its growing relevance, the demand for comprehensive education in this field increases. The objective of this work was to outline the current state of OB/GYN ULS education.MethodsA scoping literature search was performed until May 2023 using the medical database PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines. Using specific keywords, relevant publications were filtered. Subsequently, abstracts were independently reviewed by two authors and the inclusion of each publication was assessed against pre-defined key search terms. Full-text versions of the included publications were scrutinized and pertinent information was extracted.ResultsIn this review, 126 articles from the literature search matched the inclusion criteria and were investigated. Our findings revealed a diverse range of course concepts and programs, a lot of them not meeting the expectations of trainees and international guidelines. OB/GYN ULS training primarily targets residents, yet opportunities for early exposure and continuing education are underexplored. International organizations, such as the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM) have proposed guidelines and curricula for standardized training. However, adoption remains varied. There is an emergent need to innovate teaching methods.ConclusionThere is consensus that standardizing OB/GYN ULS curricula could enhance training quality and streamline the creation of new programs, ultimately improving patient care. Further research is needed to define the most effective strategies for curriculum development and implementation.

PSFHS challenge report: Pubic symphysis and fetal head segmentation from intrapartum ultrasound images

Segmentation of the fetal and maternal structures, particularly intrapartum ultrasound imaging as advocated by the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) for monitoring labor progression, is a crucial first step for quantitative diagnosis and clinical decision-making. This requires specialized analysis by obstetrics professionals, in a task that i) is highly time- and cost-consuming and ii) often yields inconsistent results. The utility of automatic segmentation algorithms for biometry has been proven, though existing results remain suboptimal. To push forward advancements in this area, the Grand Challenge on Pubic Symphysis-Fetal Head Segmentation (PSFHS) was held alongside the 26th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2023). This challenge aimed to enhance the development of automatic segmentation algorithms at an international scale, providing the largest dataset to date with 5,101 intrapartum ultrasound images collected from two ultrasound machines across three hospitals from two institutions. The scientific community's enthusiastic participation led to the selection of the top 8 out of 179 entries from 193 registrants in the initial phase to proceed to the competition's second stage. These algorithms have elevated the state-of-the-art in automatic PSFHS from intrapartum ultrasound images. A thorough analysis of the results pinpointed ongoing challenges in the field and outlined recommendations for future work. The top solutions and the complete dataset remain publicly available, fostering further advancements in automatic segmentation and biometry for intrapartum ultrasound imaging.

Ultrasonic Estimation of Fetal Weight: Are Averaged Triplicate Measurements More Accurate Than Single Measurements?

To assess whether, and to what extent, performing triplicate measurements can improve accuracy of estimation of fetal weight (EFW) compared to single measurements. This was a prospective study conducted at a single medical center. A total of 100 term parturients with an anticipated delivery within 72 hours were recruited for EFW measurements. All examinations were done with adherence to the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) guidelines. EFW was calculated using the Hadlock formula. Triplicate measurements from three different images were obtained for each parameter and the averaged values were used for clinical purposes. EFW calculated using average measurements was compared to EFW calculated using the first measurements. There was a small but significant improvement in EFW when using averaged measurements compared to single measurements (mean improvement 34 ± 105 g, P = .002). Deviance from birthweight in single measurements was significantly higher compared to averaged measurements (median deviance 198 versus 148 g, respectively, P = .005). This difference was more pronounced when assessing the 75th centile (348 versus 282 g, respectively). Using triplicate measurements instead of single measurements when performing EFW confers a small, but statistically significant, improvement to EFW accuracy. Using triplicate measurements for assessing EFW should be thus considered, especially in cases suspected of growth disorders.

Neonatal outcome-based performance of the recent International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) definition of foetal growth restriction: retrospective study

Neonatal outcome-based performance of the recent International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) definition of foetal growth restriction: retrospective study

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: An International Consensus Statement

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval.Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.This Consensus Statement should be cited as: ‘G. Condous, B. Gerges, I. Thomassin-Naggara, C. Becker, C. Tomassetti, H. Krentel, B.J. van Herendael, M. Malzoni, M. S. Abrao, E. Saridogan, J. Keckstein, G. Hudelist and Collaborators. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: An International Consensus Statement. Eur. J. Radiol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111450.’

Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Pelvic Deep Endometriosis and Endometriosis Classification Systems: An International Consensus Statement

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement.

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies. © 2024 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, by Universa Press, by The International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy, by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and by Elsevier B.V.

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement.

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers, and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling, and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

Prenatal prediction of adverse outcome using different charts and definitions of fetal growth restriction.

Antenatal growth assessment using ultrasound aims to identify small fetuses that are at higher risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. This study explored whether the association between suboptimal fetal growth and adverse perinatal outcome varies with different definitions of fetal growth restriction (FGR) and different weight charts/standards. This was a retrospective cohort study of 17 261 singleton non-anomalous pregnancies at ≥ 24 + 0 weeks' gestation that underwent routine ultrasound at a tertiary referral hospital. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) and Doppler indices were converted into percentiles using a reference standard (INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21)) and various reference charts (Hadlock, Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) and Swedish). Test characteristics were assessed using the consensus definition, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) definition and Swedish criteria for FGR. Adverse perinatal outcome was defined as perinatal death, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit at term, 5-min Apgar score < 7 and therapeutic cooling for neonatal encephalopathy. The association between FGR according to each definition and adverse perinatal outcome was compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to test the strength of association between ultrasound parameters and adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound parameters were also tested for correlation. IG-21, Hadlock and FMF fetal size references classified as growth-restricted 1.5%, 3.6% and 4.6% of fetuses, respectively, using the consensus definition and 2.9%, 8.8% and 10.6% of fetuses, respectively, using the SMFM definition. The sensitivity of the definition/chart combinations for adverse perinatal outcome varied from 4.4% (consensus definition with IG-21 charts) to 13.2% (SMFM definition with FMF charts). Specificity varied from 89.4% (SMFM definition with FMF charts) to 98.6% (consensus definition with IG-21 charts). The consensus definition and Swedish criteria showed the highest specificity, positive predictive value and positive likelihood ratio in detecting adverse outcome, irrespective of the reference chart/standard used. Conversely, the SMFM definition had the highest sensitivity across all investigated growth charts. Low EFW, abnormal mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and abnormal cerebroplacental ratio were significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcome and there was a positive correlation between the covariates. Multivariate logistic regression showed that UtA-PI > 95th percentile and EFW < 5th percentile were the only parameters consistently associated with adverse outcome, irrespective of the definitions or fetal growth chart/standard used. The apparent prevalence of FGR varies according to the definition and fetal size reference chart/standard used. Irrespective of the method of classification, the sensitivity for the identification of adverse perinatal outcome remains low. EFW, UtA-PI and fetal Doppler parameters are significant predictors of adverse perinatal outcome. As these indices are correlated with one other, a prediction algorithm is advocated to overcome the limitations of using these parameters in isolation. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement†,‡.

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on a review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): fetal cardiac screening.

ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): fetal cardiac screening.

Classification of normal and abnormal fetal heart ultrasound images and identification of ventricular septal defects based on deep learning.

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most common birth defects. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) was used to assist in CHD diagnosis. No comparison has been made among the various types of algorithms that can assist in the prenatal diagnosis. Normal and abnormal fetal ultrasound heart images, including five standard views, were collected according to the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) Practice guidelines. You Only Look Once version 5 (YOLOv5) models were trained and tested. An excellent model was screened out after comparing YOLOv5 with other classic detection methods. On the training set, YOLOv5n performed slightly better than the others. On the validation set, YOLOv5n attained the highest overall accuracy (90.67 %). On the CHD test set, YOLOv5n, which only needed 0.007 s to recognize each image, had the highest overall accuracy (82.93 %), and YOLOv5l achieved the best accuracy on the abnormal dataset (71.93 %). On the VSD test set, YOLOv5l had the best performance, with a 92.79 % overall accuracy rate and 92.59 % accuracy on the abnormal dataset. The YOLOv5 models achieved better performance than the Fast region-based convolutional neural network (RCNN) & ResNet50 model and the Fast RCNN & MobileNetv2 model on the CHD test set (p<0.05) and VSD test set (p<0.01). YOLOv5 models are able to accurately distinguish normal and abnormal fetal heart ultrasound images, especially with respect to the identification of VSD, which have the potential to assist ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis.

Predictive index for adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction.

To develop and validate an index predictive of adverse perinatal outcome (APO) in pregnancies meeting the consensus-based criteria for fetal growth restriction (FGR) endorsed by the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG). This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive singleton non-anomalous gestations meeting the ISUOG-endorsed criteria for FGR at a single tertiary care center from November 2010 to August 2020. The dataset was divided randomly into a development set (two-thirds) and a validation set (one-third). The primary composite APO comprised one or more of: perinatal demise, Grade III-IV intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), seizures, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) > 7 days. Regression analysis incorporated clinical factors readily available at the time of FGR diagnosis. The sum of β coefficient-based weights yielded an index score, the performance of which was assessed in the validation set. Score cut-offs were selected to identify 'high-risk' and 'low-risk' ranges for which positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values and positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios were calculated. Of the 875 consecutive pregnancies that met the criteria for FGR and were included in the study cohort, 405 (46%) were complicated by one or more components of the composite APO, including 54 (6%) perinatal deaths, 22 (3%) neonates with Grade III-IV IVH and/or PVL, nine (1%) with seizures and/or HIE, 91 (10%) with BPD, 57 (7%) with sepsis, 21 (2%) with NEC, and 361 (41%) who remained in the NICU > 7 days. In addition, 270 (31%) pregnancies were delivered by Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status, 43 (5%) were admitted to the NICU for < 7 days, 79 (9%) had 5-min Apgar score < 7, 125/631 (20%) had a cord gas pH ≤ 7.1 and 35/631 (6%) had a base excess ≥ 12 mmol/L. The predictive index we developed included seven factors available at the time of FGR diagnosis: hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) (+8 points), chronic hypertension without HDP (+4 points), gestational age ≤ 32 weeks (+5 points), absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery (+8 points), prepregnancy body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2 (+3 points), isolated abdominal circumference < 3rd percentile (-4 points) and non-Hispanic black race (-2 points). The bias-corrected bootstrapped (1000 replicates) area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of the predictive index for composite APO in the validation group was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.92), which was similar to that in the development group (AUC, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89); P = 0.34). In the total cohort, 40% of pregnancies had a low-risk index score (≤ 2), associated with a NPV of 85% (95% CI, 81-88%) and a LR- of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.16-0.27), and 23% had a high-risk index score (≥ 10), associated with a PPV of 96% (95% CI, 93-98%) and a LR+ of 27.36 (95% CI, 14.33-52.23). Of the remaining pregnancies that had an intermediate-risk score, 50% were complicated by composite APO. An easy-to-use index incorporating seven clinical factors readily available at the time of FGR diagnosis is predictive of APO and may prove useful in counseling and management of pregnancies meeting the ISUOG-endorsed criteria for FGR. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Definitions matter: detection rates and perinatal outcome for infants classified prenatally as having late fetal growth restriction using SMFM biometric vs ISUOG/Delphi consensus criteria.

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is often secondary to placental dysfunction and is suspected prenatally based on biometric or circulatory abnormalities detected on ultrasound. The aims of this study were to compare the screening performance of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) biometric criteria (estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) < 10th centile) with that of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG)-endorsed Delphi consensus criteria for late FGR for delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant at term, emergency Cesarean section (CS) for non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS), perinatal mortality and composite severe neonatal morbidity. We classified retrospectively non-anomalous singleton infants as having late FGR (diagnosed ≥ 32 weeks) according to SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi criteria in a cohort of women who had been referred to the Mater Mother's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia and who delivered at term between January 2014 and December 2020. The study outcomes were delivery of a SGA infant (birth weight (BW) < 10th or < 3rd centile), emergency CS for NRFS, perinatal mortality (defined as stillbirth or neonatal death within 28 days of a live birth) and a composite of severe neonatal morbidity. We assessed the screening performance of various ultrasound variables by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio. The SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi consensus criteria collectively classified 1030 cases as having late FGR. Of these, 400 cases were classified by both SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi criteria, whilst 548 cases were classified using only SMFM criteria and 82 cases were classified only by ISUOG/Delphi criteria. Prenatal detection of late FGR by SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi criteria was associated with increased odds of delivery of an infant with BW < 10th centile (SMFM: adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 133.0 (95% CI, 94.7-186.6); ISUOG/Delphi: aOR, 69.5 (95% CI, 49.1-98.2)) or BW < 3rd centile (SMFM: aOR, 348.7 (95% CI, 242.6-501.2); ISUOG/Delphi: aOR, 215.4 (95% CI, 148.4-312.7)). Compared with the SMFM criteria, the ISUOG/Delphi criteria were associated with lower odds (aOR, 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3-0.8)) of predicting a SGA infant with BW < 10th centile, but higher odds of predicting emergency CS for NRFS (aOR, 2.30 (95% CI, 1.14-4.66)) and composite neonatal morbidity (aOR, 1.22 (95% CI, 1.05-1.41)). Both SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi criteria were associated with high LR+, specificity, PPV and NPV for the prediction of infants with BW < 10th and BW < 3rd centile. However, both methods functioned much less efficiently for the prediction of composite severe neonatal morbidity or emergency CS for NRFS, with LR+ < 10. The SMFM biometric criteria alone, particularly AC < 3rd centile, had the highest LR+ values for the prediction of perinatal mortality. Both the SMFM and ISUOG/Delphi criteria had strong screening potential for the detection of infants with BW < 10th or < 3rd centile but not for adverse neonatal outcome. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

Fetal periventricular pseudocysts: is MRI evaluation needed? What is the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

To explore the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in fetuses with periventricular pseudocysts (PVPC) and the neurodevelopmental outcomes of these fetuses via meta-analysis. MEDLINE and EMBASE database were searched for studies reporting on the MRI assessment of fetuses diagnosed with PVPC on neurosonography. The neurosonography was conducted according to the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) guidelines or standard axial, coronal and sagittal planes for advanced central nervous system (CNS) assessment. Single-shot fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences of MRI technique in three orthogonal planes were necessarily performed. The pooled proportion of CNS anomalies missed on neurosonography and detected only at prenatal MRI was calculated. Subanalysis was performed according to the types of intracranial anomalies. The pregnancy outcomes (including normal, abnormal, termination of pregnancy, and perinatal death) of PVPC fetuses were also analyzed. Five studies comprising 136 fetuses were included in this meta-analysis. Mean gestational age was 29.8weeks (16-38weeks) at ultrasonography and 31.5weeks (25-37weeks) at MRI. Overall, MRI detected exclusively CNS anomalies in 25.2% (95% CI 15.9-35.8%) of cases. Among them, the highest incidence was white matter abnormalities with the pooled proportion of 16.3% (95% CI 9.7-24.2%). When getting rid of whitematter abnormalities, the risk of associated CNS anomalies only detected on MRI was reduced to 9.1% (95% CI 1.8-21.4%). Meanwhile, 130 cases were studied to assess the pregnancy outcomes with the scope of 1month to 10years. The pooled proportion of normal outcomes in isolated PVPC fetuses was as high as 95.0% (95% CI 83.9-99.8%). When analyzing the neurodevelopmental outcomes in non-isolated PVPC fetuses, the incidence of normal neurodevelopmental outcomes was about 22.1% (95% CI 5.6-45.5%) with mild and single additional abnormalities, the rate of abnormal neurodevelopmental outcomes was 19.5% (95% CI 11.0-29.7%) with apparent and/or multiple abnormalities. Besides, 53.6% (95% CI 35.4-71.3%) of non-isolated PVPC cases were terminated mainly due to infections, genetic anomalies, metabolic disorders and hemorrhage. MRI assessment of PVPC fetuses is recommended to detect associated intracranial anomalies that may be missed on dedicated neurosonography. White matter abnormalities on MRI account for the majority of additional anomalies, which might to be the clue of CMV infection, aminoacidopathy or white matter disease. Moreover, the neurodevelopmental outcome of isolated PVPC fetuses remains favorable, while the neurodevelopmental outcomes of non-isolated PVPC fetuses depend on the accompanying anomaly.

Placental Growth Factor-soluble FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase-1 Ratio in Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder: Case Control Study

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the ratio of placental growth factor (PLGF)/soluble FMSlike tyrosine kinase (sFLT-1) as a marker for in placenta accreta spectrum disorder stage. METHODS: We enrolled 50 participants in this study, 25 participants diagnosed with placenta accreta spectrum disorder and 25 participants with normal pregnancy as controls. Diagnosis is based on ultrasonographic criteria from the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) for spectrum disorders of placenta accreta. Up to 3 cc peripheral venous blood was taken before cesarean section to measured PLGF and sFlt-1 level by ELISA. All data then analyze using SPSS version 26. RESULTS: In this study, we found that the levels of sFlt-1 in the placenta accreta group (Placenta accreta spectrum stage 0/1/2) were 1711 (136.87) pg/ml, 1474 (122.88) pg/ml, and 1417 (125.45) pg/ml each. This level was higher than the control group of 1246 (98) pg/ml (p = 0.004). In measuring PLGF levels, we found that PLGF levels in the control group were lower than those in the placenta accreta group (PAS 0/1/2) with levels of 404 (33.12) pg/ml, 612 (48.96) pg/ml, 805 (53.48) pg/ml, and 785 (53.64) pg/ml, respectively. We found a correlation between placenta accreta spectrum staging with sFlt-1 levels (r = 0.27 and p = 0.015) and PLGF levels (r = 0.6646 and p = 0.001). Ratio of sFlt-1/PLGF with cutoff point 1.8 has sensitivity 97% and specificity 67% (Area under the curve (AUC) 0.784). CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between sFlt-1 and PLGF levels with placenta accreta staging based on PAS score. sFlt-1/PLGF ratio can be considered as a predictor of placenta accreta to help establish the diagnosis of placenta accreta.

Feasibility and learning curve of performing first trimester fetal anatomy screening among operators with varying experience using the protocol of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG)

Objective To compare the feasibility of performing a complete first trimester fetal anatomy screening between two operators with different levels of experience using the protocol of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), and to compare the duration of scan and learning curve of each operator as secondary outcomes. Methods A prospective study was conducted on singleton pregnancies at 11+0–13+6 weeks of gestation. Transabdominal ultrasound anatomy screening was performed by a maternal fetal medicine (MFM) staff (operator 1) or a first year MFM fellow (operator 2) following ISUOG guidelines. The visibility of fetal structures and time taken by each operator were recorded and analyzed. Results Data from 98 participants in operator 1 group and 96 participants in operator 2 group were analyzed. The success rate of visualizing all structures was feasible in 87.8% and 91.7% (p = .370) of cases in operator 1 and operator 2, respectively. The significant improvement in visualization success rate was observed between the first 50 and the last 50 scans in both groups (p = .004 vs. p = .006). Average time spent on the exam by operator 1 was significantly shorter than the time spent by operator 2 (11.3 ± 4.8 min vs. 15.0 ± 6.2 min; p < .001). Conclusion Completeness of first trimester fetal anatomy screening following ISUOG protocol were feasible with no statistical difference between the two different levels of experienced operators. Moreover, time allocatable with a brief learning curve were demonstrated in both groups.

Prediction of post-laser fetal death in selective growth restriction complicating twin-twin transfusion syndrome using standardized definitions.

Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) complicating twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) is associated with a 3-6-fold increased risk of fetal demise after fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS). Identifying these patients is challenging due to varying definitions of sFGR used in the literature. The objective of this study was to determine the association of three currently used definitions for sFGR with demise of the smaller twin, typically the donor, following FLS for TTTS. This was a retrospective cohort study of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies undergoing FLS for TTTS between January 2015 and December 2018. Classification of the cohort as sFGR or non-sFGR was performed using three different definitions: (1) estimated fetal weight (EFW) of one twin < 10th centile and intertwin EFW discordance > 25%, according to the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) (Definition A); (2) EFW of one twin < 3rd centile, according to the solitary criterion for sFGR reported in a Delphi consensus (Definition B); and (3) presence of at least two of four of the following criteria: EFW of one twin < 10th centile, abdominal circumference of one twin < 10th centile, intertwin EFW discordance of ≥ 25% and umbilical artery pulsatility index of the smaller twin > 95th centile, according to the contributory criteria for sFGR in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies reported in the Delphi consensus (Definition C). Pearson's χ2 and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of classification as sFGR according to the different definitions with fetal demise within 48 h after FLS. A total of 124 pregnancies underwent FLS for TTTS during the study period. Of these, 46/124 (37.1%) were identified as having sFGR according to the ISUOG criteria (Definition A), 57/124 (46.0%) based on EFW < 3rd centile (Definition B) and 70/124 (56.5%) according to the Delphi contributory criteria (Definition C). There were no differences in maternal body mass index, recipient twin amniotic fluid volume, gestational age (GA) at intervention or GA at delivery between sFGR and non-sFGR cases for any of the three definitions. There were also no differences in the rates of postprocedure recipient demise or Doppler abnormalities in the recipient. Regardless of the definition used, sFGR cases showed a significantly higher rate of postprocedure donor twin demise compared with that in non-sFGR cases (Definition A: 28.3% vs 3.8%, P < 0.01; Definition B: 22.8% vs 4.5%, P = 0.02; Definition C: 22.9% vs 0%, P < 0.01). For all of the sFGR definitions, the rate of Stage-III TTTS was increased in sFGR compared to non-sFGR cases (Definition A: 65.2% vs 35.9%, P ≤ 0.01; Definition B: 59.6% vs 35.8%, P = 0.04; Definition C: 62.9% vs 25.9%, P < 0.01). All cases of donor demise met the criteria for sFGR according to Definition C. Classification as sFGR according to Definition C was associated with a significantly higher rate of post-FLS donor demise compared to Definitions A and B (χ2 , 15.32; P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that sFGR cases had an increased risk of donor demise (Definition A: odds ratio (OR), 4.97 (95% CI, 1.77-13.94), P < 0.01; Definition B: OR, 4.39 (95% CI, 1.36-14.15), P = 0.01) and that staging of TTTS was also predictive of demise (OR, 2.26 (95% CI, 1.14-4.47), P = 0.02). After adjusting for GA at intervention and stage of TTTS, the results were similar (Definition A: OR, 6.48 (95% CI, 2.11-24.56), P = 0.002; Definition B: OR, 4.16 (95% CI, 1.35-15.74), P = 0.02). The rate of fetal demise following FLS for TTTS is increased in the presence of sFGR. Improving diagnosis of sFGR should improve counseling and may affect management. The Delphi method of defining sFGR based on the presence of at least two of four contributory criteria had the highest predictive value for donor demise following FLS for TTTS. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

3D Fractional Limb Volume Identifies Reduced Subcutaneous and Lean Mass in Fetal Growth Restriction.

Fetal 2D and 3D fractional limb volume (FLV) measurements by ultrasound can detect fetal lean and subcutaneous mass and possibly percent body fat. Our objectives were to 1) compare FLV measurements in fetuses with fetal growth restriction (FGR) versus small for gestational age (SGA) defined by the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG)-supported international Delphi consensus and 2) correlate FLV findings with birth metrics. We hypothesize that FLV measurements will be significantly smaller in FGR versus SGA fetuses and will correlate closer with Ponderal index (PIx) in the neonate than abdominal circumference (AC). Patients were categorized as FGR or SGA as defined by ISUOG. Total thigh volume (TTV), volumes of lean mass (LMV), and fat mass volume (FMV) were calculated from 3D acquisitions. Measurements were compared between groups and correlated with birthweight (BW) and PIx (BW/crown-heal length). The FGR group (n=37) delivered earlier (37/2 versus 38/0; P= .0847), were lighter (2.2 kg versus 2.6 kg; P= .0003) and had lower PIx (0.023 versus 0.025; P= .0013) than SGAs (n=22). FGRs had reduced TTV (40.6 versus 48.4 cm3 ; P= .0164), FMV (20.8 versus 25.3 cm3 ; P= .0413), and LMV (19.8 versus 23.1 cm3 ; P= .0387). AC had the highest area under the curve (0.69) for FGR. FMV was more strongly associated with PIx than the AC (P= .0032). The AC and FLV measurements were significantly reduced in FGR fetuses compared to SGAs. While the AC outperformed FLV in predicting FGR, the FLV correlated best with PIx, which holds investigative promise.