International Sensitivity Index Calibration Research Articles

Misguided by INR in Liver Disease Patients? Implications for Clinicians Including Pain Proceduralists.

THE ROSY PAST The prothrombin time (PT) assay, developed in 1935, was used in the identification of the anticoagulants dicumarol and warfarin. Currently, this assay is most commonly used to measure the therapeutic activity of warfarin. It was well known that PT results experienced a variation among centers using different reagents, making comparisons challenging. Around the same time came the invention of the international sensitivity index (ISI), allowing for calibration of different batches of thromboplastins to an international standard. To address interlaboratory PT variation, the international normalized ratio (INR), defined as the ratio of a patient’s PT to a control sample raised to the power of the ISI value, was invented in the 1980s. The INR became widely accepted after endorsement by the World Health Organization. This endorsement was only for control of oral anticoagulant therapy, as ISI calibration was specifically developed for comparing samples of patients with normal coagulation profiles to those who were anticoagulated with Coumadin (warfarin; Bristol-Myers-Squibb, New York, NY) for at least 6 weeks.1 Historically, plasma transfusions have been recommended for patients whose PT was found to be 1.5× longer than normal. Early thromboplastins in the United States had an ISI >2.0; therefore, a 1.5× increase in PT would equal an INR of 2.25. Currently, many thromboplastin reagents have an ISI close to 1.0 (World Health Organization standard); therefore, the same sample with a PT 1.5× longer than normal will equal an INR of 1.5. In the past, a PT 1.5× longer than normal indicated a moderate to severe factor deficiency (factor levels <30%), whereas today, the same value indicates only a mild factor deficiency (factor levels >40%).2 Figure 1.: The cascade model of fibrin formation. This model divides the coagulation system into separate redundant pathways (extrinsic and intrinsic) either of which can result in generation of FXa. The common pathway results in generation of thrombin and subsequent cleavage of fibrinogen to fibrin. Many of the enzymes and enzymatic complexes require Ca2+ and binding to active membrane surfaces (PL) for full activity. For simplicity, feedback activation of procofactors to cofactors and the many inhibitors of the various enzymes have been omitted. Reprinted with permission from Smith.4 Ca2+ indicates calcium; Fb, fibrin; Fg, fibrinogen; FXa, activated form of factor X; HMWK, high molecular weight kininogen; K, kallikrein; PK, prekallikrein; PL, active membrane surfaces; TF, tissue factor.

Significance of Local International Sensitivity Index Systems for Monitoring Warfarin and Liver function

Use of a local calibrator has been recommended for standardization of the international normalized ratio (INR) and international sensitivity index (ISI). We investigated the performance of two commercial local calibrators for warfarin monitoring and determined the significance of liver-specific INR. ISI values were determined using the World Health Organization (WHO) method and two commercial local calibrators. Liver-specific ISI was determined using plasma samples from patients with liver cirrhosis and normal controls. In warfarin monitoring, the two local ISIs determined by the two local calibrators showed better consistency than uncorrected ISI, although they were inferior to the ISIs calibrated using the WHO method. Alternative calibration using calibration plasma from patients with liver cirrhosis instead of warfarinized plasma reduced the INR variability. Local ISI determined by a commercial local calibrator improved INR standardization among thromboplastins. The alternative ISI calibration using liver-specific calibration plasma is expected to reduce INR variability for the evaluation of liver function.

Coagulometer international sensitivity index (ISI) derivation, a rapid method using the prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) Line: a multicenter study

The original WHO procedure for prothrombin time (PT) standardization has been almost entirely abandoned because of the universal use of PT coagulometers. These often give different international normalized ratio (INR) results from the manual method, between individual makes of instruments and with instruments from the same manufacture. A simple procedure is required to derive local INR with coagulometers. The PT/INR Line method has recently been developed using five European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) certified plasmas to derive local INR. This procedure has been modified to derive a coagulometer PT/INR Line providing International Sensitivity Index (ISI) and mean normal PT (MNPT) for coagulometers and give local INR. Results have been compared with conventional ISI calibrations at the same laboratories. With human thromboplastins, mean ISI by local calibration was 0.93 (range: 0.77-1.16). With the PT/INR Line, mean coagulometer ISI was higher, for example 0.99 (0.84-1.23) but using the PT/INR Line derived MNPT there was no difference in local INR. Between-centre INR variation of a certified validation plasma was reduced with human and bovine reagents after correction with local ISI calibrations and the PT/INR Line. The PT/INR Line-ISI with its derived MNPT is shown to provide reliable local INR with the 13 different reagent/coagulometer combinations at the 28 centres in this international study.

Evaluation of European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation Lyophilized Plasmas for INR Derivation Using the PT/INR Line

The prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) Line method based on 5 certified European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) plasmas provides reliable local INR values without conventional World Health Organization international sensitivity index calibrations. The present study investigated the use of different numbers and types of ECAA calibrant plasmas to derive accurate PT/INR Lines and reliable INR values. The numbers ranged from 3 to 10 plasmas in a set with normal or abnormal samples. Sets were selected, and sampling was repeated 1,000 times for each center to derive PT/INR Lines. The lines were selected randomly or from clusters. The INR values of 5 independent "validation" plasmas were compared before and after correction. In 56 calibrations, 5 ECAA plasmas gave better results than did fewer plasmas. Plasmas with wide-ranging INR values gave better results than randomly selected sets, and including a normal plasma was not essential. The INR deviations of validation plasmas from certified values were reduced with sets of human, bovine/combined, and rabbit reagents. Deviations of more than 10% from certified INR values were significantly reduced (P < .001).

Simplified Method for International Normalized Ratio (INR) Derivation Based on the Prothrombin Time/INR Line: An International Study

The need to perform local International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibrations and in particular the requirement for a manual method for prothrombin time (PT) determination, have proved to be obstacles to application of the WHO scheme for PT standardization. We used international normalized ratio (INR) derived with a set of only 5 European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) lyophilized calibrant plasmas, certified manually by expert centers with reference thromboplastins, to determine a local PT/INR Line. We compared results of an independent set of validation plasmas with INRs from conventional ISI calibrations and with manually certified INRs. The mean certified INR of 5 lyophilized validation plasmas was 2.41 with human thromboplastin, 2.04 with bovine/combined, and 2.80 with rabbit. With 42 human reagents, the mean observed INR of the validation plasmas was 2.68 (11.2% deviation from certified INR). Deviation was reduced to 0.4% with both local ISI calibration and the PT/INR Line. Eight results based on bovine/combined thromboplastin gave an INR deviation of 4.9%, becoming 0.5% after ISI calibration and 2.4% with the PT/INR Line. Six results with rabbit reagents deviated from certified INR by 2.5%. After ISI calibration, deviation became 1.1%, and with the PT/INR Line, 0.7%. The PT/INR Line gave similar results with both linear and orthogonal regression analysis. The total proportion of validation plasmas giving INR within 10% deviation from certified values was 42.5% with uncorrected INR, which increased to 92.1% with local ISI calibration and 93.2% with the PT/INR Line. The PT/INR Line procedure with 5 ECAA calibrant plasmas successfully substitutes for local ISI calibrations in deriving reliable INRs.

Effect of prothrombin time outlier exclusion rules on ISI calibration in multicentre studies

International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibration is based on prothrombin time (PT) determinations in fresh plasma samples of healthy (normal) individuals and patients treated with vitamin K-antagonists (VKA). The ISI is calculated from the slope of the orthogonal regression line of the log(PT) results. The ISI calibration model is based on the assumption that the mean logarithms of the PT's of the normals are found on the orthogonal regression line derived using patients’ samples. According to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, patients’ samples with International Normalized Ratio (INR) beyond the 1.5 to 4.5 interval shall be excluded for ISI calibration. According to the WHO guidelines, outlier samples are defined as those at a perpendicular distance from the orthogonal regression line greater than 3 residual standard deviations, and shall be excluded as well. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of sample exclusion on ISI calibration, using the data base of three historic multicenter studies performed in 1990, 1995 and 2005, respectively. Various rules for sample exclusion were tried. In comparison to calibration without any exclusion, between-laboratory variation of the ISI was slightly reduced by sample exclusion using the WHO rule. Furthermore, the adequacy of the ISI calibration model was improved. The effect of the WHO sample exclusion rule on the mean value of the ISI of the current International Standards for thromboplastins was not greater than approximately 1%. It is concluded that the WHO rule for sample exclusion is appropriate for reliable ISI calibration.

How to implement the modified international normalized ratio for cirrhosis (INRliver) for model for end-stage liver disease calculation

How to implement the modified international normalized ratio for cirrhosis (INRliver) for model for end-stage liver disease calculation

An International Normalized Ratio (INR) calibration model that is too simple leads to bias and overestimated accuracy of INR values: reply to a rebuttal

Dr J. Attermann claims that the statistical model for International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibration recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Biological Standardization [1] is evidently wrong and that data should be analyzed by an extended model provided by him. As far as we know, Dr Attermann’s extended model has been tried on one single data set as an example [2]. There are no peer‐reviewed reports in which his extended model has been tried on large data sets from multicentre collaborative studies on thromboplastin calibration.

Influence of Blood Collection Systems on the Prothrombin Time and International Sensitivity Index Determined With Human and Rabbit Thromboplastin Reagents

Three brands of blood collection tubes were studied for their influence on the prothrombin time (PT) and international sensitivity index (ISI) for 5 commercial thromboplastin reagents. With all reagents, PTs were shorter in Vacutainer (Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems, Plymouth, England) samples than in S-Monovette (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) or Venosafe (Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium) samples. ISI values were higher with Vacutainer samples than with S-Monovette or Venosafe samples. The ISI differences between the tubes were small for Thromborel-S (2.1%; Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) and Hepato Quick (1.1%; Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France; Roche Diagnostics Nederland, Almere, the Netherlands) but greater for Neoplastin Plus (5.5%; Diagnostica Stago; Roche Diagnostics Nederland), Simplastin HTF (8.3%; bioMérieux, Durham, NC), and Innovin (8.8%; Dade Behring). The PT and ISI differences between the tubes could be explained mostly by the effect of magnesium ion contamination in the sodium citrate solutions. When PT ratios were transformed into international normalized ratios (INRs) using crossover ISI (ie, samples collected with one type of tube and ISI determined with another collection system for the PT reagent), the differences in mean INRs could be approximately 10%. For ISI calibration of reference thromboplastins, blood collection tubes should be used with minimal divalent metal ion contamination of the citrate solution.

Comparison of local International Sensitivity Index calibration and 'Direct INR' methods in correction of locally reported International Normalized Ratios: an international study.

It is no longer feasible to check local International Normalized Ratios (INR) by the World Health Organization International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibrations because the necessary manual prothrombin time technique required has generally been discarded. An international collaborative study at 77 centers has compared local INR correction using the two alternative methods recommended in the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidelines: local ISI calibration and 'Direct INR'. Success of INR correction by local ISI calibration and with Direct INR was assessed with a set of 27 certified lyophilized plasmas (20 from patients on warfarin and seven from normals). At 49 centers using human thromboplastins, 3.0% initial average local INR deviation from certified INR was reduced by local ISI calibration to 0.7%, and at 25 centers using rabbit reagents, from 15.9% to 7.5%. With a minority of commercial thromboplastins, mainly 'combined' rabbit reagents, INR correction was not achieved by local ISI calibration. However, when rabbit combined reagents were excluded the overall mean INR deviation after correction was reduced further to 3.9%. In contrast, with Direct INR, mean deviation using human thromboplastins increased from 3.0% to 6.6%, but there was some reduction with rabbit reagents from 15.9% to 10% (12.3% with combined reagents excluded). Local ISI calibration gave INR correction for the majority of PT systems but failed at the small number using combined rabbit reagents suggesting a need for a combined reference thromboplastin. Direct INR correction was disappointing but better than local ISI calibration with combined rabbit reagents. Interlaboratory variability was improved by both procedures with human reagents only.

Multicentre ISI assignment and calibration of the INR measuring range of a new point-of-care system designed for home monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy

The new CoaguChek XS system is designed for use in patient selftesting. It is the successor of the current CoaguChek S system. The detection principle is based on the amperometric measurement of the thrombin activity initiated by starting the coagulation cascade using a human recombinant thromboplastin. This study was performed to assign the International SEnsitivity Index (ISI) to the new test according to the WHO guidelines for thromboplastins and plasmas used to control anticoagulant therapy, and to establish the measuring range of the new system. At four study sites a total of 90 samples of normal donors and 291 samples of warfarin-, phenprocoumon- or acenocoumarol-treated patients were included in the study. The ISI value of the new test was assigned against the human recombinant reference thromboplastin rTF/95 at each site using the samples from stabilized patients in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) range between 1.5 and 4.5 only. The new point-of-care system's measuring range between 0.8 and 8 INR was calibrated against the mean INR of rTF/95 and AD149 using polynomial regression. ISIs were (CV of the slope): Site 1: ISI 0.99 (1.1%); Site 2: ISI 1.02 (2.0%); Site 3: ISI 1.03 (1.1%); Site 4: ISI 1.00 (1.4%). All regression lines calculated from patient-only data pass through the normal donor data points. All CVs of the slopes of the orthogonal regression lines are well below 3%, thus fulfilling the requirements of the WHO guidelines. The mean ISI for the new CoaguChek XS PT Test is 1.01.

Guidelines on preparation, certification, and use of certified plasmas for ISI calibration and INR determination

Reliable international normalized ratio (INR) determination depends on accurate values for international sensitivity index (ISI) and mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT). Local ISI calibration can be performed to obtain reliable INR. Alternatively, the laboratory may determine INR directly from a line relating local log(prothrombin time [PT]) to log(INR). This can be done by means of lyophilized or frozen plasmas to which certified values of PT or INR have been assigned. Currently there is one procedure for local calibration with certified plasmas which is a modification of the WHO method of ISI determination. In the other procedure, named 'direct' INR determination, certified plasmas are used to calculate a line relating log(PT) to log(INR). The number of certified plasmas for each procedure depends on the method of preparation and type of plasma. Lyophilization of plasma may induce variable effects on the INR, the magnitude of which depends on the type of thromboplastin used. Consequently, the manufacturer or supplier of certified plasmas must assign the values for different (reference) thromboplastins and validate the procedure for reliable ISI calibration or 'direct' INR determination. Certification of plasmas should be performed by at least three laboratories. Multiple values should be assigned if the differences between thromboplastin systems are greater than 10%. Testing of certified plasmas for ISI calibration may be performed in quadruplicate in the same working session. It is recommended to repeat the measurements on three sessions or days to control day-to-day variation. Testing of certified plasmas for 'direct' INR determination should be performed in at least three sessions or days. Correlation lines for ISI calibration and for 'direct' INR determination should be calculated by means of orthogonal regression. Quality assessment of the INR with certified plasmas should be performed regularly and should be repeated whenever there is a change in reagent batch or in instrument. Discrepant results obtained by users of certified plasmas should be reported to manufacturers or suppliers.

Effect of magnesium contamination in evacuated blood collection tubes on the prothrombin time test and ISI calibration using recombinant human thromboplastin and different types of coagulometer

The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of two types of evacuated blood collection tube on the prothrombin time and international sensitivity index (ISI) of Recombiplastin, a recombinant human thromboplastin. Vacutainer tubes were compared with Venoject II tubes. Magnesium contamination was detected in the sodium citrate solutions contained in the Vacutainer tubes with concentrations ranging from 1.1 to 1.5 mmol/l. In contrast, magnesium ions could not be detected in the Venoject II tubes. The prothrombin ratio was decreased by contamination with magnesium ions and, hence, the ISI was increased. The magnitude of the effect of magnesium contamination on the ISI was influenced by the type of coagulometer and increased in the order: ACL Advance (3%), ACL-300 (4%), Electra-1000 (6%). The ISI bias is transmitted to the international normalized ratio (INR). In the case of the Electra-1000, the INR bias would be approximately 6% at INR 3.0 if the two types of blood collection tubes would be used without distinction. In a secondary study, the effect of magnesium contamination on the prothrombin time was assessed with the current World Health Organization international reference preparation for recombinant human thromboplastin (rTF/95). Magnesium chloride added to patients' blood (0.2 mmol/l) induced 2.3% reduction of the INR determined with rTF/95 and the manual technique. Conclusion The magnitude of the influence of blood collection tubes contaminated with magnesium on ISI and INR determined with recombinant human thromboplastin depends on the coagulometer.

International multicenter international sensitivity index (ISI) calibration of a new human tissue factor thromboplastin reagent derived from cultured human cells

The international sensitivity index (ISI) of the first working standard of Simplastin HTF, a new human tissue factor thromboplastin derived from cultured human cells, has been assessed in a calibration exercise in two Canadian and five European laboratories. Calibrations against international reference preparations (IRP) were performed for the manual method and six types of automated coagulometers that cover the majority of clotting endpoint principles in routine use. The ISI was method-dependent and varied between 1.03 and 1.29 when calibrated against rTF/95 (human IRP). The ISI was also dependent on the route of calibration. Compared with calibration against rTF/95, the ISIs obtained by calibration against RBT/90 (rabbit IRP) were on average 4.4% higher (P < 0.005). Considering the principle of 'like vs. like', the ISIs obtained by calibration against rTF/95 should be preferred.

European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation. Correction of displayed international normalized ratio on two point-of-care test whole-blood prothrombin time monitors (CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC) by independent international sensitivity index calibration.

The international normalized ratio (INR) on two widely used point-of-care test (POCT) prothrombin time (PT) monitors (CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC) differed considerably and also differed from the 'true' INR obtained on the same samples using a manual PT and the same species thromboplastin international reference preparation. Agreement between the displayed INR and difference from 'true' INR has been reassessed following an independent international sensitivity index (ISI) calibration of the two systems. The displayed INRs taken at seven centres were compared with 'true' INRs from the same blood donations and INRs based on the resulting ISI. The overall difference between the displayed INRs on the two monitor systems was reduced from 21.0% to 3.5%. The overall difference in mean INR of system A from the 'true' INR was reduced from 19.0% to 9.5% and of system B from 6.8% to 0.3%, but individual centre's results still showed considerable mean INR variability. Differences between overall displayed INR with the two monitor systems have been reduced by an independent multicentre calibration, and agreement with 'true' INR on the same blood samples improved. However, marked variability in mean INR at individual centres remained after ISI correction, which demonstrates the need for external quality control of individual POCT whole-blood PT monitors.

Reliability of international normalised ratios from two point of care test systems: comparison with conventional methods

Design Comparison of the INRs from the two systems with a “true” INR on a conventional manual test from the same sample of blood.Setting 10 European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation...

European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA): an assessment of a method for ISI calibration of two whole blood point-of-care PT monitor systems based on lyophilized plasmas using whole blood equivalent PT

Previously, the attempt to simplify the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibration of the CoaguChek Mini whole blood point-of-care test prothrombin time (PT) monitor system was successful using lyophilized plasmas from coumarin-treated patients but not with lyophilized artificially depleted plasmas. With the TAS PT-NC monitor system, both types of plasma failed to provide reliable calibrations. The present study assesses a procedure for the ISI calibration of a TAS PT-NC and CoaguChek Mini whole blood point-of-care test PT monitor systems using lyophilized plasmas. Using lyophilized artificially depleted and coumarin plasma calibrations, we have evaluated a correction for the monitor displayed PT. This was based on a 'line of equivalence' derived from the relationship between whole blood and fresh plasma PT with both types of monitor system. With the TAS PT-NC, the use of this 'line of equivalence' resulted in reliable ISI with both lyophilized coumarin and artificially depleted plasmas. There was no significant difference between mean monitor and mean reference International Normalized Ratio (INR) with the artificially depleted plasmas. With the lyophilized coumarin plasma calibrations there was only a small INR difference. Correction with the 'line of equivalence' therefore facilitates calibration of the TAS PT-NC with lyophilized plasmas. With the CoaguChek Mini, the correction based on the 'line of equivalence' did not improve results but was not required with this system.

European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA). An assessment of lyophilised plasmas for ISI calibration of CoaguChek and TAS whole blood prothrombin time monitors

Aims: The recommended method for the international sensitivity index (ISI) calibration of whole blood point of care testing (POCT) prothrombin time (PT) systems was originally described by Tripodi et al...

International Sensitivity Index Calibration of the Near-Patient Testing Prothrombin Time Monitor, ProTime

Near-patient testing devices (monitors) capable of measuring prothrombin time on an unmeasured drop of blood would be suitable alternatives to centralized laboratory monitoring of patients receiving oral anticoagulants. The essential prerequisite for the use of these monitors is their conformity to the international sensitivity index (ISI) calibration model recommended by the World Health Organization. We report on the ISI calibration of the ProTime monitor (International Technidyne, Edison, NJ) designed and approved for patient self-testing. According to our results, this monitor can be calibrated by adopting the model already used for other monitors. The apparent ISI was close to unity. Overall, the international normalized ratio values displayed by the monitor agreed with those measured with the international reference preparation for thromboplastin. Confirmation of these results in a large multicenter study is warranted.

European concerted action on anticoagulation. Minimum numbers of lyophilized plasma samples for ISI calibration of CoaguChek and TAS point-of-care whole blood prothrombin time monitors.

International sensitivity index (ISI) calibration of whole blood prothrombin time (PT) monitors is too complex. We previously simplified the method by using European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) lyophilized plasma samples with the TAS PT-NC (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) and the CoaguChek Mini (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) whole blood PT monitoring systems. The TAS PT-NC required a correction derived from the line of equivalence. Monte Carlo bootstrap analysis of reducing numbers of test samples was performed with both systems. Plasma samples from patients receiving coumarin (coumarin samples), healthy subjects (normal samples), and plasma samples artificially depleted of coagulation factors were used. With the TAS PT-NC, 20 coumarin samples or 20 artificially depleted samples with 7 normal samples gave reliable ISI and international normalized ratio and satisfactory precision. With the CoaguChek Mini, 30 coumarin and 10 normal samples were required. Simplification of ISI calibration of the 2 monitoring systems is possible using fewer ECAA lyophilized plasma samples than the 80 required according to the World Health Organization guidelines for conventional PT systems and previously recommended for fresh plasma samples tested on the same 2 monitoring systems.