International Prognostic Index Risk Research Articles

Ibrutinib combined with immunochemotherapy with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation versus immunochemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in previously untreated patients with mantle cell lymphoma (TRIANGLE): a three-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network

Adding ibrutinib to standard immunochemotherapy might improve outcomes and challenge autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in younger (aged 65 years or younger) mantle cell lymphoma patients. This trial aimed to investigate whether the addition of ibrutinib results in a superior clinical outcome compared with the pre-trial immunochemotherapy standard with ASCT or an ibrutinib-containing treatment without ASCT. We also investigated whether standard treatment with ASCT is superior to a treatment adding ibrutinib but without ASCT. The open-label, randomised, three-arm, parallel-group, superiority TRIANGLE trial was performed in 165 secondary or tertiary clinical centres in 13 European countries and Israel. Patients with previously untreated, stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma, aged 18-65 years and suitable for ASCT were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to control group A or experimental groups A+I or I, stratified by study group and mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index risk groups. Treatment in group A consisted of six alternating cycles of R-CHOP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenous doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 on day 1, and oral prednisone 100 mg on days 1-5) and R-DHAP (or R-DHAOx, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous or oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, intravenous cytarabine 2 × 2 g/m2 for 3 h every 12 h on day 2, and intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m2 over 24 h on day 1 or alternatively intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1) followed by ASCT. In group A+I, ibrutinib (560 mg orally each day) was added on days 1-19 of R-CHOP cycles and as fixed-duration maintenance (560 mg orally each day for 2 years) after ASCT. In group I, ibrutinib was given the same way as in group A+I, but ASCT was omitted. Three pairwise one-sided log-rank tests for the primary outcome of failure-free survival were statistically monitored. The primary analysis was done by intention-to-treat. Adverse events were evaluated by treatment period among patients who started the respective treatment. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02858258. Between July 29, 2016 and Dec 28, 2020, 870 patients (662 men, 208 women) were randomly assigned to group A (n=288), group A+I (n=292), and group I (n=290). After 31 months median follow-up, group A+I was superior to group A with 3-year failure-free survival of 88% (95% CI 84-92) versus 72% (67-79; hazard ratio 0·52 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-0·86]; one-sided p=0·0008). Superiority of group A over group I was not shown with 3-year failure-free survival 72% (67-79) versus 86% (82-91; hazard ratio 1·77 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-3·76]; one-sided p=0·9979). The comparison of group A+I versus group I is ongoing. There were no relevant differences in grade 3-5 adverse events during induction or ASCT between patients treated with R-CHOP/R-DHAP or ibrutinib combined with R-CHOP/R-DHAP. During maintenance or follow-up, substantially more grade 3-5 haematological adverse events and infections were reported after ASCT plus ibrutinib (group A+I; haematological: 114 [50%] of 231 patients; infections: 58 [25%] of 231; fatal infections: two [1%] of 231) compared with ibrutinib only (group I; haematological: 74 [28%] of 269; infections: 52 [19%] of 269; fatal infections: two [1%] of 269) or after ASCT (group A; haematological: 51 [21%] of 238; infections: 32 [13%] of 238; fatal infections: three [1%] of 238). Adding ibrutinib to first-line treatment resulted in superior efficacy in younger mantle cell lymphoma patients with increased toxicity when given after ASCT. Adding ibrutinib during induction and as maintenance should be part of first-line treatment of younger mantle cell lymphoma patients. Whether ASCT adds to an ibrutinib-containing regimen is not yet determined. Janssen and Leukemia & Lymphoma Society.

Assessment and prognostic significance of a serum cytokine panel in diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma.

The objective of the present study was to assess the levels of circulating cytokines in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and to examine the associations between the cytokine levels, clinicopathological manifestations and patient prognosis. The study enrolled 49 patients with DLBCL, 11 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma and 67 healthy controls from Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Hangzhou, China) between January 2017 and January 2020. The serum levels of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interferon (IFN)-γ were measured using flow cytometry. The IL-6, IL-10 and IFN-γ levels were significantly raised in patients with DLBCL compared with those in the healthy controls (P<0.05). The levels of IL-10 were significantly higher in patients with raised levels of circulating lactate dehydrogenase (P<0.05), while increases in both IL-6 and IL-10 were associated with raised C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, with IL-6 levels positively associated with those of serum CRP (P<0.01; r=0.66). Additionally, International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk stratification of patients with DLBCL was strongly associated with circulating IL-6 and IL-10 levels. Raised IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α levels were linked with worse short-term treatment efficacies (P<0.05). Moreover, the accuracy of the model predicting short-term treatment response in patients with DLBCL, obtained using the support vector machine algorithm, was 81.63%. It was also found that raised serum IL-6 and IL-10 levels, together with reduced levels of IL-17, were associated with survival of <1 year in patients with DLBCL (P<0.05), although no significant link was found between cytokine levels and long-term overall survival. In conclusion, the serum levels of IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α and IFN-γ can potentially serve as biological indicators of DLBCL tumor immune status, and combined application with the IPI score can be a robust prognostic indicator in patients with DLBCL.

Circulating-tumor DNA Assessment in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma to Determine Up-front Stem Cell Transplantation: A Pilot Study.

This study evaluated the possibility of clinical use of circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker to determine up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) for patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in practice. To explore the dynamics of ctDNA in DLBCL, blood samples were collected sequentially before and after treatment from patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy. To conduct ctDNA genotyping and ctDNA monitoring simultaneously, targeted sequencing by cancer personalized profiling using deep sequencing was used. Ten patients between the ages of 50 and 60 years were enrolled. Based on the international prognostic index (IPI), seven patients were classified as high-IPI-risk group, and three patients were classified as low-IPI-risk group. The IPI risk group correlated with total metabolic tumor volume. All patients completed six cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy, and seven patients achieved complete response. Changes in ctDNA mutation numbers did not correlate with changes in PET scan images and treatment response. In most high-risk patients, new mutations appeared in ctDNA after completion of chemotherapy that conceivably marked resistant clones. Notably, disease relapse did not occur in high-risk patients with poor prognostic mutations who underwent autologous SCT. ctDNA monitoring was meaningful in high-risk patients. Moreover, ctDNA and well-known prognostic factors should be considered in the decision making for auto-SCT. If a new genetic mutation in ctDNA with a negative prognosis would emerge during treatment, high-risk patients should consider auto-SCT.

SurvIAE: Survival prediction with Interpretable Autoencoders from Diffuse Large B-Cells Lymphoma gene expression data

BackgroundIn Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), several methodologies are emerging to derive novel biomarkers to be incorporated in the risk assessment. We realized a pipeline that relies on autoencoders (AE) and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to stratify prognosis and derive a gene-based signature. MethodsAE was exploited to learn an unsupervised representation of the gene expression (GE) from three publicly available datasets, each with its own technology. Multi-layer perceptron (MLP) was used to classify prognosis from latent representation. GE data were preprocessed as normalized, scaled, and standardized. Four different AE architectures (Large, Medium, Small and Extra Small) were compared to find the most suitable for GE data. The joint AE-MLP classified patients on six different outcomes: overall survival at 12, 36, 60 months and progression-free survival (PFS) at 12, 36, 60 months. XAI techniques were used to derive a gene-based signature aimed at refining the Revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) risk, which was validated in a fourth independent publicly available dataset. We named our tool SurvIAE: Survival prediction with Interpretable AE. ResultsFrom the latent space of AEs, we observed that scaled and standardized data reduced the batch effect. SurvIAE models outperformed R-IPI with Matthews Correlation Coefficient up to 0.42 vs. 0.18 for the validation-set (PFS36) and to 0.30 vs. 0.19 for the test-set (PFS60). We selected the SurvIAE-Small-PFS36 as the best model and, from its gene signature, we stratified patients in three risk groups: R-IPI Poor patients with High levels of GAB1, R-IPI Poor patients with Low levels of GAB1 or R-IPI Good/Very Good patients with Low levels of GPR132, and R-IPI Good/Very Good patients with High levels of GPR132. ConclusionsSurvIAE showed the potential to derive a gene signature with translational purpose in DLBCL. The pipeline was made publicly available and can be reused for other pathologies.

Effectiveness of Chemo-Immunotherapy (CIT) and Novel Therapies in Second or Later Line of Therapy (2L+) for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Aim: Patients with R/R LBCL after first-line treatment have poor prognosis. Multiple novel therapies have been approved for R/R LBCL in recent years, but CIT regimens are still commonly used. This study evaluated the effectiveness of CIT and novel therapies in 2L+ in patients with R/R LBCL and the association between patient clinical characteristics and real-world outcomes. Methods: This was a multi-site retrospective observational study of patients aged ≥18 years with R/R LBCL in the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Consortium of Real-World Evidence (CReWE) cohort (patients followed from 1/1/2015 to 2/15/2023) who were treated with CIT or novel therapy in 2L+. CIT regimens included salvage/palliative chemotherapy, lenalidomide, rituximab, or obinutuzumab, used alone or in combination. Novel therapies included polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab or variations thereof (i.e., pola-based regimen), tafasitamab plus lenalidomide or variations thereof (tafa-based regimen), and loncastuximab tesirine (lonca). Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed from the first confirmed R/R disease diagnosis and initiation of 2L+ therapy. When multiple lines of therapy (LOTs) were eligible for inclusion in the analysis, one was randomly selected as the index LOT. Real-world outcomes, determined by investigators at each clinical site, including overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), duration of complete response (DOCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were described for all patients in each treatment group and for the subgroup of patients with prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to assess associations between select patient clinical characteristics and real-world outcomes. Results: The study population included patients treated with CIT (N=653), pola-based regimen (N=116), tafa-based regimen (N=55), and lonca (N=42) ( Figure 1A). The median (m) age at date of index treatment initiation across groups ranged from 63 to 74 years. Across groups, most patients had primary refractory disease-i.e., were refractory to the first LOT (69.5% CIT vs. 73.3% pola vs. 58.2% tafa vs. 71.4% lonca), whereas variable proportions had one prior LOT (65.5% vs. 17.2% vs. 43.6% vs. 7.1%) and prior CAR T-cell therapy (5.1% vs. 43.1% vs. 32.7% vs. 47.6%). In the CIT group, ORR was 33.8%, 15.5% of patients achieved CR, mPFS (95% CI) was 1.9 (1.7, 2.1) months, and mOS was 9.1 (8.1, 10.5) months. In the pola group, ORR was 42.2%, 24.1% of patients achieved CR, mPFS was 2.5 (2, 3.2) months and mOS was 7.8 (6.4, 11.8) months. In the tafa group, ORR was 25.5%, 14.5% of patients achieved CR, mPFS was 2.7 (2.1, 4.2) months, and mOS was 8 (5.3, 12.7) months. In the lonca group, ORR was 40.5%, 21.4% of patients achieved CR, mPFS was 3 (2.1, 5.1) months, and mOS was 4.7 (3.7, 10.8) months. Demographics and outcomes for all patients and those who received prior CAR T-cell therapy are summarized in Figure 1A. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk score ≥3, CIT as the index treatment type, and primary refractory status were significantly associated with time from response to progression/death (P&amp;lt;0.05; Figure 1B). IPI risk score ≥3, CIT as the index treatment type, and primary refractory status were significantly associated with worse PFS. IPI risk ≥3, ≥3 prior LOTs, and primary refractory status were significantly associated with OS. Conclusion: In this large clinical cohort of patients with R/R LBCL with high proportions having primary refractory disease, all common treatments were associated with modest ORR/CR and poor OS. Receiving CIT treatments, higher IPI score, primary refractory status, and higher number of prior LOTs were significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes. A study with larger sample size and longer follow-up may be warranted to further understand the clinical effectiveness of novel treatments. Thus, despite the availability of novel treatments during the study period, these findings highlight the need for more effective treatment alternatives beyond currently available options to improve outcomes.

A Single Center Experience with Using Dose-Adjusted Repoch in Elderly Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Background: RCHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) has been the predominant regimen for treatment of aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL). In the CALGB 50303 trial, REPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) was associated with similar efficacy but increased toxicity compared to RCHOP, however pts with higher risk disease by International Prognostic Index (IPI) had longer progression-free survival (PFS) with REPOCH therapy in the subgroup analysis ( J Clin Oncol, 2019). Providers may be hesitant to use REPOCH therapy in older, frail patients (pts) with high-risk LBCL due to concern for increased toxicity. One study demonstrated that empirically dose-reduced REPOCH (30-50% dose reduction by age group) was effective and well-tolerated in an elderly population ( Ann Hematol, 2018).A separate study showed significantly reduced neuropathy rates without compromised efficacy when vincristine doses in the REPOCH regimen were capped at 0.5 mg/d compared to 0.4 mg/m 2/d ( Leukemia &amp; Lymphoma, 2019). At our institution, vincristine doses are capped at 0.4 mg/d for all pts, and REPOCH dosing is not empirically dose-reduced based for age alone. The aim of this study is to provide additional insights on the safety and efficacy of REPOCH in elderly pts diagnosed with LBCL with a routine vincristine dose cap of 0.4 mg/day (“REPOCH 0.4”). Methods: In this single cohort study, pts with newly diagnosed LBCL that received dose-adjusted REPOCH 0.4 at a single institution from August 2015 to October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Pts were excluded if they received fewer than 2 cycles, had CNS disease, transferred to another facility during treatment, or were lost-to-follow-up. Primary endpoints included adverse effects (AEs), overall response rates (ORR) via Lugano staging at end of treatment, 2y PFS, and overall survival (OS). Survival endpoints were estimated via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Secondary endpoints included CNS relapse rates and percentage of pts electing for hospice during therapy. Outcomes were descriptively compared to the historical cohort (N=241) in the CALGB 50303 trial receiving R-REPOCH without a vincristine dose cap ( J Clin Oncol, 2019) . Results: Forty-six pts were eligible for analysis (“entire cohort”), 19 of whom were 70 years or older (“70+ cohort”, figure 1). Median age in the entire and 70+ cohort was 67 and 75 years respectively. In the entire cohort, 23.9% of pts were double-hit, 43.5% had a non-germinal center phenotype, and 78.3% had stage III-IV disease. The median number of REPOCH 0.4 cycles received in both the entire and 70+ cohort was 6. In the 70+ cohort, 57.9% of pts were escalated to a dose level (DL) of 2 or 3 with no pts escalated beyond DL 3. Fifty-eight percent of pts in the entire cohort received intrathecal CNS prophylaxis and all pts received pegfilgrastim support. Pts in the entire cohort were older and higher-risk in comparison to the historical cohort as evidenced by IPI risk and double-expressor status. In the entire cohort, REPOCH 0.4 was well-tolerated (figure 2) with grade 3+ neuropathy rates of only 2.2% (5.2% in the 70+ cohort). Febrile neutropenia (all grades) occurred in 19.5% and 15.8% of the entire cohort and 70+ cohort respectively. Only 1 patient in the 70+ cohort experienced acute ejection fraction (EF) decline during therapy. ORR (complete and partial response) in the entire and 70+ cohort were 80% and 74% respectively. Complete response (CR) rates in the entire and 70+ cohort were both 63%. 2y PFS in the entire cohort was 68.3% (median not reached), and the 2y OS in the entire cohort was 82.9% (median not reached) which compares favorably to the 2y OS of 86.5% in the historical cohort. Overall, only 7% of pts elected for hospice and only 4% experienced CNS relapse. Conclusion: Pts with LBCL 70+ years tolerated dose-adjusted REPOCH 0.4 mg/d similarly to the entire cohort of all ages indicating that empiric dose reduction for age alone isn't necessary. CR rates were similar (63%) with pts 70+ years compared to pts in the entire cohort of all ages. REPOCH 0.4 mg/d was observed to have numerically lower rates of grade 3 or higher neuropathy (2.2%) compared to vincristine 0.4 mg/m 2/d (8.4%, J Clin Oncol 2019) and vincristine 0.5 mg/d dosing strategies (4.5%, Leukemia &amp; Lymphoma 2019) . To our knowledge, this is the first report of outcomes with REPOCH using a vincristine dose cap of 0.4 mg/d.

The Prognostic Impact of Relative Dose Intensity of Vincristine in R-CHOP for Untreated Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Supplementary Analysis of JCOG0601

Introduction R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide [CY], doxorubicin [DXR], vincristine [VCR], and prednisolone) is the standard of care for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and cures around 60% of patients. However, some DLBCL survivors suffer from long-lasting peripheral neuropathy (PN) caused by VCR, and the dose of VCR is usually decreased to prevent severe PN. Though, there is a lack of information regarding the effect of VCR dose reduction on DLBCL prognosis, especially based on data from prospective clinical trials. Recently, VCR dose reduction was not associated with poor prognosis in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas, based on the results of the RICOVER-60 trial (NCT00052936) (Bewarder et al., Haematologica 2023). In this trial, R-CHOP was administered in 14-day cycles. To evaluate the clinical impact of relative dose intensity (RDI) of VCR (RDI O) in patients with DLBCL treated with tri-weekly R-CHOP (R-CHOP21), we conducted a supplemental analysis of the JCOG0601: randomized phase II/III trial of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (jRCTs031180139). In the JCOG0601 trial, RW-CHOP21 (CHOP21 with eight doses of weekly rituximab) and R-CHOP21 were compared for progression-free survival (PFS) (Ohmachi et al., Blood Adv. 2021). Methods Between 2007 and 2014, 422 patients were enrolled in the JCOG0601 trial. Among them, 401 patients who received at least six courses of R-CHOP21 (n=206) or RW-CHOP21 (n=195) were eligible for this supplemental analysis. Those who could not complete six courses of chemotherapy were excluded because their treatment outcomes might be impaired mainly due to their disease aggressiveness and not the dose intensity of chemotherapy. As PFS was not significantly different between the two treatment arms, these 401 patients were analyzed together (Figure A). The impact of decreased RDI O on PFS was assessed using the Cox proportional hazard model and two-sided log-rank p-values with several cutoff values of RDI O (95, 90, 85, 80, 70, 60, or 50%). The VCR dose was reduced according to the protocol. As a subgroup analysis, the impact of RDI O was evaluated in patients whose RDI of CY and DXR (RDI C+H) were retained, defined as RDI C+H were both ≥85% (high RDI C+H), or not retained, defined as either or both of RDI C+H were &amp;lt;85% (low RDI C+H). Clinical factors, including the cell of origin (COO), as defined by the Hans algorithm, were evaluated for their association with poor PFS. Result The baseline clinical characteristics of the 401 patients were as follows: median age, 62 years (range, 20-79), male sex (54.6%); performance status of 0 or 1 (97.5%); Ann Arbor stage Ⅰ or Ⅱ (53.4%); and International Prognostic Index (IPI) of low or low-intermediate (82.6%). The median RDI O of the 401 patients was 97% (interquartile range [IQR], 89-100). The median RDI of CY and DXR were as high (96% each). At the data cut-off date (Dec 2017), the median follow-up time was 59.4 months, and the 3-year PFS was 81.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.3-85.0). Among the cutoff values investigated, 95% of RDI O (&amp;lt;95% [n=161], ≥95% [n=240]) showed the smallest p value (log-rank test, p = 0.0679), and the hazard ratio (HR) of low RDI O against high RDI O was 1.452 (95% CI, 0.971-2.171) (Figure B); RDI O &amp;lt;95% clinically means VCR dose was reduced in one or more times. A cutoff value of 95% was used for further analyses. Patients with RDI O &amp;lt;95% tended to have low RDI C+H. According to RDI O of &amp;lt;95% vs. ≥95%, there was a similar difference in the subgroup of patients with high RDI C+H as in the whole population (n=324, HR 1.508, 95% CI 0.934-2.434), but no remarkable difference in low RDI C+H (n=77, HR 0.932, 95% CI 0.432-2.009). Multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of B symptoms (HR 1.859, 95% CI 1.078-3.207) and high-intermediate or high IPI scores (HR 1.721, 95% CI 1.031-2.873) were risk factors for PFS. However, neither RDI O &amp;lt;95%, low RDI C+H, nor COO subtypes showed no remarkable impact on poor PFS in this patient population. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that among patients with DLBCL who completed six or more courses of R-CHOP21, VCR dose reduction was not associated with poor PFS as much as the presence of B symptoms and high IPI risk. VCR dose reduction driven by toxicity might not impair its efficacy if patients can complete R-CHOP21 therapy.

Expression and significance of jumonji domain-containing protein 2B and hypoxia inducible factor-1α in non-Hodgkin lymphoma tissues in children

To investigate the expression and significance of jumonji domain-containing protein 2B (JMJD2B) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) tissues in children. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of JMJD2B and HIF-1α in lymph node tissue specimens from 46 children with NHL (observation group) and 24 children with reactive hyperplasia (control group). The relationship between JMJD2B and HIF-1α expression with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in children with NHL, as well as the correlation between JMJD2B and HIF-1α expression in NHL tissues, were analyzed. The positive expression rates of JMJD2B (87% vs 21%) and HIF-1α (83% vs 42%) in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The expression of JMJD2B and HIF-1α was correlated with serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and the risk of international prognostic index in children with NHL (P<0.05). The expression of JMJD2B was positively correlated with the HIF-1α expression in children with NHL (rs=0.333, P=0.024). JMJD2B and HIF-1α are upregulated in children with NHL, and they may play a synergistic role in the development of pediatric NHL. JMJD2B can serve as a novel indicator for auxiliary diagnosis, evaluation of the severity, treatment guidance, and prognosis assessment in pediatric NHL.

Metabolic Tumor Volume from Baseline PET/CT Improves Stratification in the High IPI Risk Patients with Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma

Background: In the rituximab era, the international prognostic index (IPI) risk stratification was not enough to predict outcome in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Previous studies showed the Metabolic tumor volume（MTV） from baseline [ 18F]FDG PET/CT could be used to predict outcome. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of IPI and MTV in DLBCL patients. Patients and methods: A total of 262 de novo DLBCL patients who were treated with the R-like chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The IPI and MTV were compared to the Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS). Results: The MTV is better than TLG and SUVmax for predicting disease progression. The cutoff value of MTV was 444 cm 3. Patients with high MTV showed inferior OS and PFS ( p &amp;lt; 0.001, respectively). Although the IPI remains predictive it distinguishes only 2 risk groups, rather than the 4 groups originally described. Further analysis showed high MTV could identify a subgroup of patients with extremely inferior OS and PFS in high IPI risk patients ( p = 0.0089 and p= 0.024, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that high MTV is a significant poor prognostic factor for both OS (HR 3.168[1.81-5.56], p &amp;lt;0.001) and PFS (HR 2.637 [1.51-3.71], p &amp;lt;0.001). Conclusions: Our study suggests that MTV from baseline PET/CT is an important prognostic factor in DLBCL patients, allowing the identification of an inferior outcome subgroup in high-risk patients, which may help to guide treatment in clinical trial.

Pirtobrutinib, a Highly Selective, Non-Covalent (Reversible) BTK Inhibitor in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Results from the Phase 1/2 BRUIN Study

Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a chronic and incurable disease requiring multiple lines of therapy for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. Covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKi) have transformed the management of select B-cell malignancies, in particular chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, despite the transformative impact in CLL and MCL, the efficacy of single-agent cBTKi has been limited in pts with R/R FL, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 20.9% to 37.5% (Gopal et al, J Clin Oncol, 2018; Bartlett et al, Blood, 2018). Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, non-covalent (reversible) BTKi, inhibits both wildtype and C481-mutant BTK with equal low nM potency and has a favorable oral pharmacology that enables continuous BTK inhibition throughout the once-daily dosing interval. Pirtobrutinib has demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerability in pts with poor-prognosis B-cell malignancies following prior therapy, including cBTKi. Here, we report the safety and efficacy of pirtobrutinib in a cohort of pts with R/R FL from the BRUIN study (NCT03740529). Methods: Pts with previously treated B-cell malignancies were eligible for treatment with pirtobrutinib monotherapy in either the dose escalation or expansion portion of the multicenter phase 1/2 BRUIN study. FL diagnosis required pathologic review of an adequate biopsy. Key endpoints included investigator-assessed ORR per Lugano 2014 criteria, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. A data cutoff date of 05 May 2023 was utilized. Results: Among the 48 pts with FL, 45 (94%) pts received the recommended phase 2 dose of pirtobrutinib (200 mg once daily) as their starting dose. Pts had a median age of 64.5 years (range, 37.0-85.0), were mostly male (60%, n=29), and had a median of 3 (range, 1-12) prior lines of therapy. Most pts (81%, n=39) had Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease. The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) risk was low (0-1) in 9 (19%) pts, intermediate (2) in 13 (27%) pts, high (3-5) in 23 (48%) pts, and missing in 3 (6%) pts. Overall, 43 (90%) pts had received chemotherapy plus an anti-CD20 antibody, 17 (35%) pts had received a PI3K inhibitor, 14 (29%) pts had received lenalidomide, 6 (13%) pts had received an autologous stem cell transplant, and 4 (8%) pts had received CAR T-cell therapy. Of the 4 (8%) pts who had received a prior cBTKi, 3 discontinued due to disease progression and 1 discontinued for intolerance. The ORR was 50.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.2-64.8), including 7 (14.6%) complete responses and 17 (35.4%) partial responses (Figure). An additional 12 (25.0%) pts had stable disease. Among 4 pts who had received prior cBTKi, 3 achieved partial response and 1 had stable disease. With a median follow-up of 18.4 months (interquartile range, 10.1-21.0) among 24 responding pts, median DoR was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-not estimable [NE]), and the 18-month estimated DoR rate was 41.0% (95% CI, 20.1-60.9). Median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.8-8.1), and the 18-month estimated PFS rate was 32.3% (95% CI, 19.1-46.2). Median OS was NE, and the 18-month estimated OS rate was 78.3% (95% CI, 62.1-88.1). The efficacy outcomes by FLIPI risk category are presented in the Table. The median time on treatment was 7.6 months (range, 0.6-42.2), with 14 (29.2%) pts still receiving pirtobrutinib. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), regardless of attribution, were diarrhea (29.2%, n=14), fatigue (25.0%, n=12), and nausea (22.9%, n=11). TEAEs of hemorrhage/hematoma (6.3%, n=3), hypertension (4.2%, n=2), and atrial fibrillation/flutter (2.1%, n=1) were infrequent. The most frequent grade ≥3 TEAEs were infection (18.8%, n=9) and neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased (14.6%, n=7). Only 1 (2.1%) pt had a treatment-related adverse event (rash) that led to pirtobrutinib discontinuation. Conclusions: In this cohort of heavily pre-treated pts with R/R FL, pirtobrutinib showed potential efficacy and was well tolerated, including in pts with high risk FLIPI.

An Externally Controlled Trial to Indirectly Compare Tazemetostat Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab Versus Lenalidomide and Rituximab after at Least One Prior Systemic Therapy in Patients with Refractory and Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma

BACKGROUND: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent, incurable lymphoma with a heterogeneous clinical course characterized by multiple relapses. Recent data indicate a potential synergism between tazemetostat and lenalidomide and an additive effect with rituximab, offering a clinical rationale for this as a combination strategy (Batlevi, Blood 2022). SYMPHONY-1 Phase 1b, Stage 1 (EZH-302; NCT04224493) is an open-label, single-arm, safety run-in trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of tazemetostat combined with lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2). This study indirectly compares the efficacy results of the SYMPHONY-1 Phase 1b single arm trial with an external control arm (ECA) derived from the Flatiron Health Research Database (FHRD), consisting of real-world FL patients treated with R2 after receiving ≥1 prior systemic therapy. METHODS: This study utilized individual patient data from SYMPHONY-1 based on a data cutoff date of July 10, 2023, and the FHRD, a large database of electronic health records from oncology practices in the United States, including data through December 31, 2022. The treatment arm consisted of patients enrolled in the safety run-in portion of SYMPHONY-1 treated with a combination of tazemetostat plus R2, followed from enrollment to the data cutoff date. The ECA was constructed by applying eligibility criteria adapted from SYMPHONY-1 to real-world patients from the FHRD treated with R2 in second line (2L); patients were followed from the start date of the earliest eligible line of therapy (LOT) to the end of the patient's record. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete or partial response. In SYMPHONY-1, ORR was assessed by an independent review committee according to the 2014 Lugano Classification. In the ECA, real-world ORR (rwORR) was determined by the treating clinician's interpretation of change in disease burden. The analysis set included patients from the treatment arm with ≥1 evaluable response assessment and patients from the ECA with ≥1 radiographic assessment documented in the FHRD. The statistical analysis used propensity score weighting (PSW) to adjust the distribution of seven prespecified baseline patient characteristics of the ECA to align with the treatment arm. These characteristics were age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, disease grade at diagnosis, progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) from diagnosis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) &amp;gt; upper limit of normal (ULN), size of the largest node, and Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) risk group. An impute-then-exclude multiple imputation strategy was used to handle missing data for variables required in the eligibility criteria and PSW. The primary endpoint was indirectly compared by estimating the difference between the ORR of the treatment arm and rwORR of the balanced ECA on each imputed dataset, and the associated standard errors were approximated using bootstrapping. Rubin's rules were applied to combine the results into a single estimate with a 95% confidence interval and corresponding two-sided p-value. RESULTS: The primary analysis compared 42 patients in the treatment arm from SYMPHONY-1 and a median of 36 patients (range: 34 to 38) in the ECA among 815 total patients in the FHRD across ten imputed datasets. The unweighted analysis found an ORR of 95.2% in the treatment arm and 75.7% in the ECA, resulting in a difference of 19.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6-35.5) (Table 2). After PSW, the distribution of baseline characteristics for the ECA was comparable with the treatment arm (all standardized mean differences &amp;lt; 0.16), and the median effective sample size was reduced to 12.7 (range: 4.9 to 19.1) (Table 1). ORR was 95.2% in the treatment arm and 77.9% in the ECA, resulting in a difference of 17.3% (95% CI: -17.5-52.1; two-sided P = 0.16) (Table 2). CONCLUSIONS: This ECA study found that patients treated with tazemetostat combined with R2 were estimated to have a higher ORR than those treated with R2, though inference is limited due to small sample sizes. These findings help contextualize the SYMPHONY-1 Phase 1b single-arm trial results and combination potential of tazemetostat plus R2. There is a randomized Phase 3 confirmatory trial underway to confirm the clinical benefit of tazemetostat plus R2 (SYMPHONY-1 Stage 2, NCT04224493).

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC) of Efficacy and Safety of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (liso-cel) and Mosunetuzumab for the Treatment (Tx) of Third Line or Later (3L+) Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma (FL)

Background:The tx landscape of R/R FL is evolving with the availability of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies and CD20xCD3 bispecific T-cell-engaging monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Liso-cel is an autologous, CD19-directed, 4-1BB CAR T cell therapy which recently reported a positive benefit-risk tx profile for the 3L+ tx of patients with R/R FL (Morschhauser F, et al. ICML 2023; LBA4). Mosunetuzumab, a CD20xCD3 bispecific T-cell-engaging mAb, is approved for the tx of R/R FL after 2 or more lines of therapy (LOT). In the absence of head-to-head data, we conducted an unanchored MAIC to compare the efficacy and safety of liso-cel and mosunetuzumab for the 3L+ tx of patients with R/R FL. Methods: Unanchored MAICs were used to estimate population-adjusted relative tx effects between individual patient-level data from TRANSCEND FL (NCT04245839; data as of January 27, 2023; median follow-up of 19.3 months) and aggregate data from GO29781 (NCT02500407; data as of August 27, 2021; median follow-up of 18.3 months; N = 90). For TRANSCEND FL, the leukapheresed (intention to treat [ITT]) set (N = 114) was used for primary comparisons of efficacy endpoints: Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and complete response rate (all per independent review committee assessment). Overall survival was not analyzed due to the low rate of events. The treated efficacy set (n = 101) was used for a sensitivity analysis of efficacy comparisons. The treated set (n = 107) was used for comparisons of safety endpoints: cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurological events (NEs), serious infections, and use of corticosteroids or tocilizumab for CRS. Baseline characteristics and outcome measures in TRANSCEND FL were redefined to align with those reported in GO29781. Data from TRANSCEND FL were weighted using a method-of-moments propensity score model to match the marginal distribution (ie, mean, variance) of clinical factors among patients from GO29781. A panel of expert clinicians selected and ranked tx effect modifiers separately for efficacy and safety endpoints. For efficacy, factors adjusted for included number of prior systemic LOTs, progression of disease ≤ 24 months from initiation of immunochemotherapy, bulky disease at screening, FL International Prognostic Index risk factor, refractory to last therapy, double refractory to an anti-CD20 antibody and alkylating agent, ECOG PS at screening, sex, and prior autologous HSCT. For safety, factors adjusted for included age, bulky disease at screening, refractory to last therapy, number of prior systemic LOTs, ECOG PS at screening, Ann Arbor stage, and sex. Hazard ratios (HR) were used to compare PFS, and odds ratios (OR) were used for response rates and safety outcomes. Results: After adjusting for all available factors, when compared with mosunetuzumab, liso-cel was associated with higher objective response rate (OR, 3.78 [95% CI, 1.48‒9.67]), and complete response rate (OR, 6.46 [2.85‒14.65]), and improved PFS (HR, 0.28 [0.16‒0.49]) based on an effective sample size (ESS) of 71.4 (Figure). Results were consistent across all scenario analyses, including unadjusted comparisons and sensitivity analyses using the treated efficacy set for TRANSCEND FL. Although liso-cel was associated with higher incidence of any-grade CRS (OR, 1.86 [1.01‒3.43]) and any-grade NEs (OR, 2.16 [0.72‒6.44]), it demonstrated a lower incidence of grade ≥ 3 CRS (OR, 0.45 [0.04‒5.13]) and grade 3-4 serious infections (OR, 0.35 [0.12‒1.03]) based on an ESS of 81.9 compared with mosunetuzumab. Furthermore, liso-cel was associated with reduced use of corticosteroids for CRS management (OR, 0.14 [0.03‒0.65]), while the use of tocilizumab was higher in patients treated with liso-cel (OR, 2.27 [0.86‒5.99]). Conclusions: In this MAIC, liso-cel was associated with improved efficacy compared with mosunetuzumab. Liso-cel had a lower incidence of grade ≥ 3 CRS, grade 3-4 serious infections, and steroid use for management of CRS; however, liso-cel exhibited higher incidence of any-grade CRS, any-grade NEs, and tocilizumab use for CRS management. Safety comparisons were confounded by preventative use of corticosteroids in all patients in GO29781 and definition differences, most notably for NEs. These findings highlight a potential positive benefit-risk profile of liso-cel over mosunetuzumab as a 3L+ tx option for R/R FL.

Lower Prognostic Performance of the International Metabolic Prognostic Index Compared to the Conventional IPI and NCCN-IPI in a Real-World Cohort of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Introduction: The international metabolic prognostic index (IMPI) is a recently proposed model that shows improved outcome prediction for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) compared to the International Prognostic Index (IPI) (Mikhaeel et al.). IMPI combines total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) as continuous variables with clinical factors, allowing individualized prognosis estimation. However, the applicability of IMPI to routine clinical practice remains uncertain since the model construction was based on data from clinical trials. Furthermore, the comparison of the model performance between IMPI and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (NCCN-IPI) is not reported so far. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who were initially treated with R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) at Kameda Medical Center between 2006 and 2020. Patients who had no fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lesions were excluded. TMTV was defined as the volume of lymphoma-associated lesions with a standardized uptake value of ≥4 as the absolute threshold (Metavol, Hokkaido University, Japan). According to the original study (Mikhaeel et al.), IMPI was calculated using the following formula: 0.003077330 × (MTV lower than the median of 307.9ml) - 0.002761985 × (MTV higher than the median of 307.9ml) + 0.008092449 × Age -0.114645415 × Stage 2 + 0.281141117 × Stage 3 + 0.322247142 × Stage 4. The receiver operating curve (ROC) for predicting 5-year survival was compared among IMPI-, IPI-, and NCCN-IPI-based classifications. The predictive performance of these three systems was evaluated using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's concordance index (c-index). Results: A total of 314 patients were included in the study. The median age was 72 years old (interquartile range [IQR] 64-79), which was younger than the original data (median 62, IQR 51-70). Regarding the distributions of IPI risk groups, this cohort had a lower number of low-risk patients (27.0% vs. 32.4%) and a higher number of high-risk patients (23.9% vs. 19.5%). The median TMTV was 168 (IQR 47-530), which was approximately two times lower than that in the original study (median 307, IQR 77-838). After calculating and ranking the individual IMPI scores, nearly half of the patients (n=147, 46.8%) were reclassified into different risk groups from the original IPI categories (Figure 1); 76 (51.7%) were upstaged, and 71 (48.3%) were downstaged. Of note, the reclassification resulted in a significantly better OS prediction only for the IPI high-risk group (5-year OS rate, IMPI high-risk vs. IMPI not high-risk, 41.9% vs. 59%, P =0.042), while it did not for the IPI low-, low-intermediate-, and high-intermediate-risk groups. The area under the curve (AUC) from the ROC curve predicting 5-year survival was not significantly different between IMPI- (AUC 0.65) and either IPI- (AUC 0.67, P =0.42) or NCCN-IPI-categories (AUC 0.68, P=0.25). Finally, the predictive performance and model fitness were compared among these three indices. IMPI had the highest AIC (1117.68) and the lowest c-index (0.643) for OS prediction, whereas NCCNIPI yielded the best performance (AIC 1097.66 and c-index 0.677) (Table 1). Conclusions: We demonstrated that the IMPI model did not outperform the conventional IPI and NCCN-IPI systems in a real-world cohort of DLBCL patients. The difference in age and tumor burden, which are the major components of IMPI, may lead to poorer prognostic performance. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate the prognostic value of IMPI outside of clinical trials.

Refractory/Relapsed High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma in the Elderly: A Special Therapeutic Challenge

BACKGROUND: According to the 2016 World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms, high- grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) is defined as a new category for aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL), including DLBCL NOS as well. CASE REPORT: An 80-year-old patient was admitted because of an enlargement of the lymph node located in the right neck region. The patient underwent 6 cycles of R-CHOP, which is considered to be the standard treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) DLBCL (NOS) CSII B “Bulky,” and he subsequently achieved complete remission (CR). A lymph node biopsy was performed, PH No. 12742/21, which revealed the following: LCA+, CD79 α CD20+, and CD5+, in approximately 50% of the cells, NHL DLBCL (NOS) was of GCB origin, etc. The international prognostic index risk score was 2, the cumulative illness rating scale score was 4. In addition, no bone marrow infiltration was reported. A COP-based chemotherapy protocol was administered, after which the evaluation showed disease relapse. Multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) follow-up showed an enlarged conglomerate of lymph nodes in all the neck levels. Dg: NHL DLBCL (NOS) CS IVB “Bulky” E (the hypopharynx). The echocardiography results were the following: (EF 50%, aortic insufficiency with MR1+, TR1+ of the aortic valve 3+). The patient was presented to the Consilium, who decided to apply the following therapy (Polatuzumab vedotin + Rituximab + Bendamustine). After III cycle of treatment, MSCT follow-up was performed. The patient gained weight, oral food intake was enabled, whereas the quality of life was significantly improved. CONCLUSION: The administration of ta treatment may be provided to elderly patients with relapsed HGBL.

Prediction of lymphoma response to CAR T cells by deep learning-based image analysis.

Clinical prognostic scoring systems have limited utility for predicting treatment outcomes in lymphomas. We therefore tested the feasibility of a deep-learning (DL)-based image analysis methodology on pre-treatment diagnostic computed tomography (dCT), low-dose CT (lCT), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) images and rule-based reasoning to predict treatment response to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in B-cell lymphomas. Pre-treatment images of 770 lymph node lesions from 39 adult patients with B-cell lymphomas treated with CD19-directed CAR T-cells were analyzed. Transfer learning using a pre-trained neural network model, then retrained for a specific task, was used to predict lesion-level treatment responses from separate dCT, lCT, and FDG-PET images. Patient-level response analysis was performed by applying rule-based reasoning to lesion-level prediction results. Patient-level response prediction was also compared to prediction based on the international prognostic index (IPI) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The average accuracy of lesion-level response prediction based on single whole dCT slice-based input was 0.82+0.05 with sensitivity 0.87+0.07, specificity 0.77+0.12, and AUC 0.91+0.03. Patient-level response prediction from dCT, using the "Majority 60%" rule, had accuracy 0.81, sensitivity 0.75, and specificity 0.88 using 12-month post-treatment patient response as the reference standard and outperformed response prediction based on IPI risk factors (accuracy 0.54, sensitivity 0.38, and specificity 0.61 (p = 0.046)). Prediction of treatment outcome in B-cell lymphomas from pre-treatment medical images using DL-based image analysis and rule-based reasoning is feasible. This approach can potentially provide clinically useful prognostic information for decision-making in advance of initiating CAR T-cell therapy.

Positron emission tomography-adapted therapy in low-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results of a randomized, phase III, non-inferiority trial.

The current standard of care for non-bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) of 0 is four cycles of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) but whether the same efficacy can be achieved with reduced chemotherapy regimen of four cycles for non-bulky DLBCL patients with an IPI of 1 remains unclear. This study compared four cycles versus six cycles of chemotherapy in non-bulky low-risk DLBCL patients with negative interim positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT, Deauville 1-3), irrespective of age and other IPI risk factors (IPI 0-1). This was an open-label, randomized, phase III, non-inferiority trial. Patients aged 14-75 years with newly diagnosed low-risk DLBCL, according to IPI, achieving PET-CT confirmed complete response (CR) after four cycles of R-CHOP were randomized (1:1) between four cycles of rituximab (4R-CHOP+4R arm) or two cycles of R-CHOP plus two cycles of rituximab (6R-CHOP+2R arm). The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), conducted in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients with at least one cycle of assigned treatment. The non-inferiority margin was -8%. A total of 287 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, the median follow-up was 47.3 months, and the 2-year PFS rate was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92% to 99%) and 94% (95% CI, 91% to 98%) for the 4R-CHOP+4R and 6R-CHOP+2R arm. The absolute difference in 2-year PFS between the two arms was 1% (95% CI, -5% to 7%), supporting the non-inferiority of 4R-CHOP+4R. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was lower in the last four cycles of rituximab alone in the 4R-CHOP+4R arm (16.7% versus 76.9%), with decreased risk of febrile neutropenia (0.0% versus 8.4%) and infection (2.1% versus 14.0%). For newly diagnosed low-risk DLBCL patients, interim PET-CT after four cycles of R-CHOP was effective in identifying patients with Deauville 1-3 who would have a good response and Deauville 4-5 patients who might have high-risk biological features or develop resistance. Reducing the standard six cycles to four cycles of chemotherapy had comparable clinical efficacy and fewer adverse events in low-risk, non-bulky DLBCL with interim PET-CT confirmed CR.

Genetic and transcriptomic analyses of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients with poor outcomes within two years of diagnosis

Background: R-CHOP immunochemotherapy is the first-line treatment for DLBCL, but approximately 30%–40% of patients still experience refractory or relapsed (R/R) disease. We aimed to characterize the molecular features of DLBCL derived from patients with early R/R disease and develop a prognosis model to identify those high-risk patients. Methods: We performed a comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic characterization on 161 R-CHOP-treated DLBCL samples. These patients were grouped by follow-up outcome status after R-CHOP treatment. The first group had R/R disease within two years of diagnosis (poor outcome; n = 50), and the second group remained in remission at two years following R-CHOP treatment (good outcome; n = 111). In an addition, external cohorts were included in the validation analysis (GSE117556, n = 374; GSE181063, n = 810). Results: Patients with poor outcomes more often had an advanced stage of the disease, a high international prognostic index (IPI) and a non-GCB subtype of the tumor. We identified a set of frequent somatically mutated targets (Figure 1A), including PIM1, TP53, MPEG1 and ROBO1, as well as a specific mutational signature (activation-induced cytidine deaminase related) in DLBCLs with poor outcomes. Transcriptomic analyses further showed a distinct gene expression pattern and a less inflamed tumor microenvironment in these patients (Figure 1B). Finally, we developed an 11-gene signature as an independent prognostic marker for DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP (Figure 1C). The 11-gene signature could further stratify DLBCL patients based on their IPI scores (Figure 1D). Additionally, the use of 11-gene signature to identify high-risk patients was also validated in two independent cohorts, suggesting the robustness of the risk model. Furthermore, our model effectively identified high-risk patients, including those with double-hit and MCD genetic subtypes that are associated with poor survival outcomes. FIGURE 1 (A) The mutation pattern between poor outcome and good outcome DLBCLs. (B) Tumor-infiltrating immune cells in DLBCL patients with poor and good outcomes. (C-D) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of PFS between high-risk and low-risk groups (C) and the association of 11-gene risk scores and IPI risk groups (D). Keywords: Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers, Genomics, Epigenomics, and Other -Omics No conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract.

External Validation of the FLIPI Risk Score Measured at Diagnosis and POD24 Among Individuals With Follicular Lymphoma at the Time of Subsequent Relapse

BackgroundThe Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) risk score and POD24 have previously been shown to have prognostic value in follicular lymphoma (FL), but the extent to which they can inform prognosis at the time of subsequent relapse is uncertain. Patients and MethodsWe conducted a longitudinal cohort study of individuals diagnosed with FL between 2004 and 2010 in Alberta, Canada who received front-line therapy and subsequently relapsed. FLIPI covariates were measured prior to the initiation of front-line therapy. Median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS2), and time to next treatment (TTNT2) were estimated from the time of relapse. ResultsA total of 216 individuals were included. The FLIPI risk score was highly prognostic at the time of relapse for OS (c-statistic = 0.70; HR[High vs. Low] = 7.38; 95% CI: 3.05-17.88), PFS2 (c-statistic = 0.68; HR[High vs. Low] = 5.84; 95% CI: 2.93-11.62) and TTNT2 (c-statistic = 0.68; HR[High vs. Low] = 5.72; 95% CI: 2.87-11.41). POD24 was not prognostic at the time of relapse for either OS, PFS2, or TTNT2 (c-statistic = 0.55). ConclusionThe FLIPI score measured at diagnosis may help with the risk stratification of individuals with relapsed FL.

Baseline PET radiomics outperforms the IPI risk score for prediction of outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

AbstractThe objective of this study is to externally validate the clinical positron emission tomography (PET) model developed in the HOVON-84 trial and to compare the model performance of our clinical PET model using the international prognostic index (IPI). In total, 1195 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were included in the study. Data of 887 patients from 6 studies were used as external validation data sets. The primary outcomes were 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 2-year time to progression (TTP). The metabolic tumor volume (MTV), maximum distance between the largest lesion and another lesion (Dmaxbulk), and peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak) were extracted. The predictive values of the IPI and clinical PET model (MTV, Dmaxbulk, SUVpeak, performance status, and age) were tested. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic performance, using the positive predictive value (PPV). The IPI yielded an AUC of 0.62. The clinical PET model yielded a significantly higher AUC of 0.71 (P < .001). Patients with high-risk IPI had a 2-year PFS of 61.4% vs 51.9% for those with high-risk clinical PET, with an increase in PPV from 35.5% to 49.1%, respectively. A total of 66.4% of patients with high-risk IPI were free from progression or relapse vs 55.5% of patients with high-risk clinical PET scores, with an increased PPV from 33.7% to 44.6%, respectively. The clinical PET model remained predictive of outcome in 6 independent first-line DLBCL studies, and had higher model performance than the currently used IPI in all studies.

The gut microbiota correlate with the disease characteristics and immune status of patients with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Gut microbiota characteristics in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are reportedly different when compared with the healthy population and it remains unclear if the gut microbiota affects host immunity and clinical disease features. This research investigated the gut microbiota in patients with untreated DLBCL and analyzed its correlation with patient clinical characteristics, humoral, and cell immune status. Thirty-five patients with untreated DLBCL and 20 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited to this study and microbiota differences in stool samples were analyzed by 16S rDNA sequencing. Absolute ratios of immune cell subset counts in peripheral blood were detected by flow cytometry and peripheral blood cytokine levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Relationships between changes in patient microbiomes and clinical characteristics, such as clinical stage, international prognostic index (IPI) risk stratification, cell origin, organ involved and treatment responses were investigated and correlations between differential microbiota and host immune indices were analyzed. The alpha-diversity index of intestinal microecology in DLBCL patients was not significantly different when compared with HCs (P>0.05), nonetheless beta-diversity was significantly decreased (P=0.001). p_Proteobacteria were dominant in DLBCL, while p_Bacteroidetes abundance was significantly decreased when compared with HCs (P<0.05). Gut microbiota characteristics were identified that were associated with clinical features, such as tumor load, risk stratification and cell origin, and correlation analyses were performed between differential flora abundance associated with these clinical features and host immune status. The p_Firmicutes was positively correlated with absolute lymphocyte values, g_Prevotella_2 and s_un_g_Prevotella_2 were negatively correlated with absolute lymphocyte values, T cell counts and CD4 cell counts, while g_Pyramidobacter, s_un_g_Pyramidobacter, and f_Peptostreptococcaceae were negatively correlated with IgA. Dominant gut microbiota, abundance, diversity, and structure in DLBCL were influenced by the disease, correlated with patient immune status and this suggested that the microecology-immune axis may be involved in regulating lymphoma development. In the future, it may be possible to improve immune function in patients with DLBCL by regulating the gut microbiota, improve treatment response rates and increase patient survival rates.