International Knee Documentation Committee Pain Research Articles

Is Patient Satisfaction Associated With Clinical Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee?

Background: The association between patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes after cartilage repair is not well understood. Purpose: To investigate the association of patient satisfaction with pain, function, activity level, and quality of life after fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation in the knee. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study comprised 371 patients (396 knees) who underwent primary OCA transplantation for osteochondral lesions in the knee between 1997 and 2015. Mean ± SD patient age was 31.8 ± 11.6 years, and 62% were male. The majority of grafts (62%) were located on the femoral condyle; the mean number of grafts per knee was 1.5 ± 0.8; and the median graft area was 6.9 cm2 (range, 1.8-50 cm2). Pain, function, activity level, and quality of life were evaluated pre- and postoperatively via International Knee Documentation Committee scores and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores. Patient satisfaction with the results of the OCA transplantation was assessed postoperatively. All follow-up evaluations occurring at postoperative 1 year or later were included in the analysis. Results: The mean follow-up time was 5.5 years. Overall, the satisfaction rate was 88.1%, and this rate was constant over time. Satisfaction rates varied by diagnosis, age, sex, and anatomic location of the allograft. Postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee pain, function, and total scores differed between patients who were satisfied and not satisfied (all P < .001). All Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale results differed between those who were satisfied and not satisfied (all P < .001). Having a diagnosis of osteochondritis dissecans was the only variable that predicted which patients would be satisfied with the results of the allograft, after controlling for age, sex, anatomic location of the graft, and number of grafts. Conclusion: A consistently high and durable patient satisfaction rate after OCA transplantation was found. Satisfied patients reported lower pain and higher function, activity levels, and quality of life as compared with patients who were not satisfied. Patients with osteochondritis dissecans had a particularly high level of satisfaction with the OCA procedure.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in Patients With Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee

Background: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee can be difficult to treat. Cartilage restoration techniques are often indicated when the lesion or fragment cannot be salvaged and the patient remains symptomatic. Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation can restore both bone and cartilage defects characteristic of OCD. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that osteochondral allografting is a successful method for treating OCD of the knee. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study comprised 135 patients (149 knees) who underwent OCA for OCD of the knee (type III or IV) between 1997 and 2013 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The median age was 21 years (range, 12-55 years) and 75.8% of the patients were male. The mean allograft size was 7.3 cm2 (range, 2.2-25 cm2). Evaluation included the following: frequency and type of reoperations; modified Merle d’Aubigné and Postel (18-point) scale; International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) pain, function, and total scores; and Knee Society function (KS-F) and knee (KS-K) scores. Clinical failure was defined as revision OCA or conversion to arthroplasty. Graft survivorship was determined. Results: The median follow-up time was 6.3 years (range, 1.9-16.8 years) and 62% of participants had more than 5-year follow-up. Thirty-four of 149 knees (23%) had reoperations, of which 12 (8%) were classified as allograft failures (7 OCA revisions, 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, and 2 total knee arthroplasties). OCA survivorship was 95% at 5 years and 93% at 10 years. Of the 137 knees whose grafts were still in situ at the latest follow-up, the mean modified Merle d’Aubigné and Postel (18-point) score was 16.8; IKDC pain, function, and total scores were 2.1, 8.1, and 82.3; and KS-F and KS-K scores were 95.7 and 94.3, respectively. The majority of patients (95%) reported being satisfied with the outcome of their procedure. Conclusion: OCA transplantation was an effective treatment for OCD of the knee, with a low rate of graft failure, significant improvement in pain and function scores, and high patient satisfaction.

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Bipolar Reciprocal Osteochondral Lesions of the Knee

Background: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is an effective treatment option for chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee. Hypothesis: Patients treated with OCAs for reciprocal bipolar lesions of the knee would demonstrate significant clinical improvement. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between 1983 and 2010, OCAs were implanted for bipolar chondral lesions in 46 patients (48 knees). The 21 male and 25 female patients averaged 40 years of age (range, 15-66 years). Thirty-four lesions were tibiofemoral, and 14 were patellofemoral. Forty-two knees (88%) had undergone a mean of 3.4 previous surgeries (range, 1-8). The mean allograft area was 19.2 cm2. Clinical evaluation included the modified Merle d’Aubigné-Postel (18-point), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) pain and function, and Knee Society function (KS-F) scores. Further surgeries on the operative joint were documented. Results: Survivorship of the bipolar OCA was 64.1% at 5 years. Thirty knees underwent further surgery; 22 knees (46%) were considered failures (3 OCA revisions, 14 total knee arthroplasties, 2 unicondylar arthroplasties, 2 arthrodeses, and 1 patellectomy). Among patients whose OCA was still in situ at follow-up, the mean follow-up was 7 years (range, 2.0-19.7 years). The mean 18-point score improved from 12.1 to 16.1; 88% (23/26 knees) of surviving allografts scored ≥15. The mean IKDC pain score improved from 7.5 to 4.7, and the mean IKDC function score improved from 3.4 to 7.0. The mean KS-F score improved from 70.5 to 84.1. Conclusion: Osteochondral allograft transplantation is a useful salvage treatment option for reciprocal bipolar cartilage lesions of the knee. High reoperation and failure rates were observed, but patients with surviving allografts showed significant clinical improvement.

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee

Objectives:Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee can be difficult to treat. Cartilage restoration techniques are often indicated when the lesion or fragment cannot be salvaged. Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation can restore both bone and cartilage defect as a treatment modality. We hypothesize that osteochondral allografting is a successful method for treating osteochondritis dissecans of the knee.Methods:Between 1983 and 2010, 164 patients (181 knees) underwent OCA for OCD of the femoral condyle(s) (type III or IV). Minimum two-year follow-up was available on 149 patients (165 knees). Median age was 25 years (range, 14 to 55) and 73% were male. Mean allograft size was 7.2 cm2(range, 2 to 23 cm2). Evaluation included frequency and type of reoperations, modified Merle d’Aubigné-Postel (18-point) scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) pain and function scores, and Knee Society function (KS-F) score. Clinical failure was defined as revision OCA or conversion to arthroplasty. Graft survivorship was determined.Results:Median follow-up time was 7.7 years (range, 2 to 28.4 years). 78% had more than 5-year follow-up. Fifty-one of 165 knees (31%) had reoperations, of which 21 (13%) were classified as allograft failures (13 OCA revisions, 5 UKA, and 3 TKA). OCA survivorship was 93% at 5 years, 87% at 10 years, and 77% at 20 years. Of the 144 knees whose grafts were still in situ, 91% were rated good/excellent, 8% were rated fair, and 1% was rated poor. Mean modified Merle d’Aubigné-Postel (18-point) scale was 17, mean IKDC pain and function scores were 2 and 8, and mean KS-F score was 93. 88% of patients reported satisfaction.Conclusion:Osteochondral allograft transplantation was an effective treatment for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee, with significant improvement in pain and function scores and high patient satisfaction. Graft survivorship was 87% at 10 years.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee in the Pediatric and Adolescent Population

Background: Multiple studies in adults have shown that osteochondral allograft transplantation is an effective treatment option for large chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee. Limited outcome data are available on osteochondral allografts in the pediatric and adolescent patient populations. Purpose: To describe a 28-year experience with osteochondral allograft transplantation in patients younger than 18 years with a focus on subjective outcome measures, return to activities, and allograft survivorship. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 39 patients (43 knees) underwent fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions. Twenty-six male and 17 female knees with a mean age of 16.4 years (range, 11.0-17.9 years) at index surgery were followed-up at a mean of 8.4 years (range, 1.7-27.1 years). Thirty-four knees (79%) had at least 1 previous surgery. The most common underlying causes of the lesions were osteochondritis dissecans (61%), avascular necrosis (16%), and traumatic chondral injury (14%). Mean allograft size was 8.4 cm2. The most common allograft location was the medial femoral condyle (41.9%), followed by the lateral femoral condyle (35%). Each patient was evaluated with the International Knee Documentation Committee pain, function, and total scores; a modified Merle d’Aubigné-Postel (18-point) scale; and Knee Society function score. Failure was defined as revision osteochondral allograft or conversion to arthroplasty. Results: Five knees experienced clinical failure at a median of 2.7 years (range, 1.0-14.7 years). Four failures were salvaged successfully with another osteochondral allograft transplant. One patient underwent prosthetic arthroplasty 8.6 years after revision allograft. Graft survivorship was 90% at 10 years. Of the knees whose grafts were in situ at latest follow-up, 88% were rated good/excellent (18-point scale). The mean International Knee Documentation Committee scores improved from 42 preoperatively to 75 postoperatively, and the Knee Society function score improved from 69 to 89 (both P < .05). Eighty-nine percent of patients reported “extremely satisfied” or “satisfied.” Conclusion: With 88% good/excellent results and 80% salvage rate of clinical failures with an additional allograft, osteochondral allograft transplantation is a useful treatment option in pediatric and adolescent patients.

Revision Osteochondral Allograft Transplantations

Background: Primary fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation is a useful treatment option for osteochondral lesions in the knee. Clinical failure of primary osteochondral allograft transplantation may require further surgery, including revision osteochondral allograft transplantation. Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of patients who have undergone revision osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This series included 33 patients (33 knees) who underwent revision osteochondral allograft transplantation between 1983 and 2012, were at least 2 years out from surgery, and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical evaluations included the International Knee Documentation Committee pain, function, and total scores; Knee Society function score; and modified Merle d’Aubigné and Postel scale. Failure of the revision allograft was defined as conversion to partial or total knee arthroplasty. Results: The mean follow-up after revision osteochondral allograft transplantation was 10 years, with 75% of patients having more than 5 years’ follow-up. Thirteen patients (39%) had failed results after revision osteochondral allograft transplantation, with a mean time to failure of 5.5 years. The remaining 20 patients (61%) had surviving revision allografts, with a mean graft survival of 10 years. Mean pain and function scores at the last follow-up were improved. Survivorship of the revision allograft was 61% at 10 years. Conclusion: Revision osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee demonstrated acceptable clinical outcomes, although they were inferior to primary allograft transplantation procedures. Revision osteochondral allograft transplantation may be considered an option for patients with a failed primary osteochondral allograft.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Evaluation of Chondral lesions treated with Allografts Juvenile Cells

Objectives:The De Novo NT graft (®)(natural tissue) (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) is a new technique that consists of a scaffold free allogeneic juvenile cartilage. The purpose of this study is to describe the first cases performed in our institution with De Novo NT (®) assessing both clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance imaging.Methods:17 patients with focal patella femoral cartilage lesions treated with De Novo NT (®) were prospectively followed. The mean age at the time of surgery was 30 years. Clinical assessment was performed with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), KOOS and MARX at baseline and most recent follow up. Magnetic resonance imaging, including T2 relaxation time maps and T1 rho in six patients, was used to evaluate the cartilage repair morphologic characteristics in 12 patients.Results:Fifteen patients met the study criteria with a mean follow up of 12 months (±3). The mean defect size was 217±100 mm. In 11 cases the lesion was in the patella, 3 in the trochlea and one in both patella and trochlea. Mean improvement in preoperative to postoperative score was significant for the IKDC objective score 45.8 (±28) to 73.3 (±24) (p=.009), IKDC pain score 49.1 (±20) to 69.8 (±23) (p=.003), KOOS 53.5 (±21) to 75.5 (±15) (p=.001), IKDC subjective 41.3 (±21.7) to 72.7 (±15) (p=.004). MRI demonstrated only two cases (16%) with graft hypertrophy. There was only one case with a detached graft. Mild and moderate subchondral edema was present in 90% (11 patients) of the cases. At the interface between the repaired tissue and the native cartilage, there were only two cases with a fissure of more than 2mm. Very good (66 to 100%) and good (between 33-66%) cartilage fill was present in 54% of the cases. Mild synovial reaction was present in 58% of the cases. From the 6 patients with T2 mapping, all repairs showed significantly different prolongation of quantitative T2 values in both the superficial and deep components of the repair tissue (47.18 for repair vs 28.3 for native (p=0.005) in the deep area and 58.6 for repair vs 37.4 for native in the superficial area (p=0.02). (Figure 1).Conclusion:De Novo NT® appears to be an effective treatment for patello-femoral chondral lesions, with significant improvement in the short-term clinical follow up. The MRI indicated implant stability with peripheral integration in most cases. As the implanted cells are allogeneic, synovial reaction is a parameter that should be considered. Only 5 patients had moderate synovial reaction, which did not affect the graft. Quantitative T2 mapping showed stratification of T2 values suggesting maturation to hyaline cartilage.

Long term followup of fresh osteochondral allografting of the femoral condyle

Long term followup of fresh osteochondral allografting of the femoral condyle

Fresh Osteochondral Allografting for Steroid-associated Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Condyles

Osteonecrosis is a complication of corticosteroid therapy with limited treatment options in young, active patients. These options include debridement, core decompression, osteotomy, allografting, and partial or total knee replacement. Few studies exist regarding the use of osteochondral allografts for treatment of steroid-associated osteonecrosis. We asked if fresh osteochondral allografts would (1) heal to host bone in the presence of osteonecrosis, (2) provide a clinically meaningful decrease in pain and improvement in function, and (3) prevent or postpone the need for prosthetic arthroplasty. Twenty-two patients (28 knees) who underwent osteochondral allografting for high-grade, corticosteroid-associated osteonecrosis were evaluated. Their average age was 24.3 years (range, 16-44 years). The mean graft surface area was 10.8 cm(2) (range, 5.0-19.0 cm(2)). Evaluation included a modified (for the knee) D'Aubigné and Postel (18-point) score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Knee Society function scores. The minimum followup was 25 months (mean, 67 months; range, 25-235 months). Five knees failed. The graft survival rate was 89% (25 of 28). The mean D'Aubigné and Postel score improved from 11.3 to 15.8; 19 of 25 (76%) had a score greater than 15. The mean IKDC pain score improved from 7.1 to 2.0, mean IKDC function score from 3.5 to 8.3, and mean Knee Society function score from 60.0 to 85.7. Our data suggest osteochondral allografting is a reasonable salvage option for osteonecrosis of the femoral condyles. TKA was avoided in 27 of the 28 of knees at last followup. Level IV, case series. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.