While the treatment of time in, and the temporal structure of, stories from the folk-cultural register have fascinated students of folk-narrative for a long time,5 this fascination has reached a new peak in recent years.6 There is now considerable agreement among scholars, and I subscribe to this view, that the folktale, and by that we mean essentially what in German is usually termed the mdrchen, is in its very nature ahistorical. For this reason, it narrates a past which cannot be accommodated in any identifiable historical, calendar, or clock-on-the-wall time-frame but rather is determined by the folktale's own narrative time. The formulaic introductory phrase 'Once upon a time' (Es war einmal) or one of its recognisable equivalents eases the listener/reader out of the historical time in which the story is being told (narration time) into this narrative time, providing an unmistakable linguistic signal that both the narrator's intentions and the listener's expectations will be markedly different from those involved in, let us say, a historian's chronicling of the past, an official report on a recent occurrence, or even a storyteller's rendering of a local legend. Once convincingly embedded in narrative time, any story's total recounted time is presented in narrated and non-narrated portions, of which the former-the narrated portions-which are roughly equivalent to the episodes of the narrative structure set out in Antti Aarne's and Stith Thompson's Tale Type Index7 are normally proportionately less extensive than the latter-the non-narrated segments-thus giving folktales in their very telling a paradoxical lopsidedness towards silence, towards the redundance of the unsaid. The basic unit of this internal temporal structure is the day, and any further subdivision of its somewhat elastic diurnal frame of reference is dominated by the sundial, not the clock. Whether one agrees with this particular overview of this scheme of things or with the specific terminology through which it is expressed, or not, there is no denying that the relationship between time and the folktale in the actualisation of which believable chunks of the past are created through narration, has been charted in great detail and that its description and analysis have been given noteworthy scholarly attention. Although, naturally, much work still remains to be done in the exploration of this particular facet of folktales, solid foundations have undoubtedly been laid on which a reliable intellectual edifice can be built. Even without further study, therefore, we can with some confidence already answer questions regarding the 'When' of the events which folktales depict.
Read full abstract