Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Research Articles

Clinical efficacy of different androgen deprivation therapies for prostate cancer and evaluation based on dynamic-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of different androgen deprivation therapies for prostate cancer (PCa) based on dynamic-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).Methods104 patients with PCa were studied, all of whom were treated with androgen deprivation therapy. The patients were divided into a continuous group (continuous androgen deprivation therapy) and an intermittent group (intermittent androgen deprivation therapy) by random number table method, 52 cases/group. The therapeutic effect and DCE-MRI indices were compared and the relationship between DCE-MRI indices and clinical efficacy and the evaluation value of therapeutic efficacy were analyzed.ResultsThe objective response rate (ORR) of the intermittent group was higher than that of the continuous group (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in disease control rate (DCR) between the two groups (p > 0.05). After treatment, volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans), reverse transfer constant (Kep), volume fraction (Ve), blood volume (BV), and blood flow (BF) in both groups were lowered, and those in the intermittent group were lower than the continuous group (p < 0.05). Ktrans, Kep, Ve, BF, and BV in the ORR group were lower than those in the non-ORR group (p < 0.05). Ktrans, Kep, Ve, BF, and BV were correlated with the therapeutic effect of PCa (p < 0.05). The AUC value of the combined detection of DCE-MRI indices in evaluating the therapeutic effect of PCa was greater than that of each index alone (p < 0.05).ConclusionCompared with continuous androgen deprivation therapy, intermittent androgen deprivation therapy has better clinical efficacy in the treatment of PCa, and DCE-MRI indices are related to the treatment efficacy of PCa and have an evaluation value.

EORTC 2238 "De-Escalate": a pragmatic trial to revisit intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in the era of new androgen receptor pathway inhibitors.

The landscape of treating metastatic prostate cancer has evolved with the addition of Androgen Receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) to Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), significantly improving survival rates. However, prolonged use of these therapies introduces notable side effects, prompting a need to revisit intermittent treatment duration. The EORTC 2238 De-Escalate trial is a pragmatic trial seeking to reassess the role of intermittent therapy in patients undergoing maximal androgen blockade (MAB) for metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC), i.e., the combination of ADT with an ARPI, with the aims of reducing side effects, enhancing Quality of Life (QoL) and optimizing resource usage, while maintaining oncological benefits.

Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy as Potential Treatment for Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

The efficacy of intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is unknown, and its usefulness in Japanese practice needs to be investigated. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 85 patients who underwent RARP and were selected for intermittent ADT for postoperative recurrence at Kanazawa University Hospital between 2009 and 2019. Intermittent ADT was administered for 2 years. If prostate-specific antigen levels increased post-treatment, intermittent ADT was reinitiated. The median follow-up period was 47 months. The 73 patients had completed the initial course of ADT, and 12 were under initial ADT. The 5-year castration-resistant prostate-cancer-free survival rates, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were 92.7%, 98.3%, and 94.7%, respectively. A subgroup analysis of 69 patients who completed intermittent ADT was conducted to evaluate the BCR rate following initial ADT. The 5-year BCR-free survival rate was 53.2%. Multivariate analysis identified testosterone ≤ 0.03 ng/mL during ADT as the sole predictor of BCR after ADT. Salvage intermittent ADT may be an effective treatment option for BCR after RARP. In addition, it would be useful to confirm strong testosterone suppression as a criterion for transition to intermittent therapy.

Systemic and tumor-directed therapy for oligorecurrent metastatic prostate cancer (SATURN): Primary endpoint results of a phase II clinical trial.

174 Background: Nearly all men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer who receive intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) will experience a relapse within six months of testosterone recovery. We hypothesized that intensifying intermittent ADT with dual next-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and adding metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) would significantly increase the number of men who remain relapse-free six months after testosterone recovery. Methods: Men with 1-5 extrapelvic metastases on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT after initial treatment with definitive-intent radical prostatectomy were enrolled on this phase II study (NCT03902951). Men with visceral metastases were excluded. Patients were treated with 6 months of androgen annihilation therapy (AAT) using leuprolide, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, and apalutamide. After the first month of AAT, patients received SBRT to all metastases with or without radiotherapy directed to the prostate bed and pelvic lymph nodes. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who maintained PSA <0.05 ng/mL six months after testosterone recovery to ≥150 ng/dL, with the study powered to detect an improvement from 1% to 12%. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) starting from AAT initiation and, for patients whose testosterone recovered, eugonadal PFS starting from the time of testosterone recovery. Progression was defined as PSA ≥0.05 ng/mL. Results: 28 men enrolled from March 2021-June 2022. Median follow-up was 20 months (range: 14–27 months). Twenty patients (71.4%) completed six months of ADT with dual ARSIs and SBRT, 5 patients (17.9%) completed ADT with a single ARSI and SBRT, 1 patient (3.6%) completed six months of ADT monotherapy with SBRT, and 2 patients (7.1%) withdrew prematurely. 13/26 patients (50%) maintained PSA <0.05 ng/mL six months after testosterone recovery (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32–67%) compared to the study hypothesis of 12%. Median PFS was 19.3 months (95% CI: 12.8–25.7). 1-year PFS was 69.2%. 21/26 patients (81%) had testosterone recovery at a median of 9.4 months (95% CI: 8.5–10.4) from the start of AAT. Median eugonadal PFS was 11.4 months (95% CI: 4.9–18.0). AAT had 21.4% grade 2 and 21.4% 3 toxicity rates. SBRT had 7.7% grade 2 and no grade 3 toxicity. Conclusions: Half of men with PSMA PET-defined oligorecurrent M1a-b disease who received six months of AAT and metastasis-directed SBRT remained relapse-free six months after testosterone recovery. The regimen was well tolerated, with 90% of patients completing six months of ADT and at least one next-generation ARSI. Further prospective data will evaluate whether dual ARSIs are necessary and the extent to which SBRT with short-course AAT outperforms SBRT with ADT monotherapy in this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT03902951 .

Testosterone suppression and recovery in patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (iADT) with relugolix.

70 Background: Many patients with advanced prostate cancer do not want to pursue continuous androgen deprivation therapy (cADT) because of concerns about side effects, and pursue iADT. However, even intermittent treatment with GNRH agonist therapy may not lead to rapid recovery of testosterone during the off-treatment period. In the pivotal HERO trial of relugolix (GNRH antagonist) the testosterone recovery time was in weeks [PMID 32469183]. The objective of the study was to measure the time to testosterone suppression to castrate level and time to recovery of serum testosterone to non-castrate level in real-world patients with advanced prostate cancer undergoing intermittent relugolix therapy. Methods: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, the eligibility was: patients with advanced prostate cancer undergoing iADT with relugolix. iADT with relugolix was defined as initiating relugolix at PSA ≥ 10 ng/ml and holding relugolix when PSA ≤ 4 ng/ml. The primary endpoints were: 1) time to serum castrate level of testosterone after relugolix initiation and 2) time to recovery to non-castrate level after discontinuation of relugolix. Castrate level of serum testosterone was defined as serum testosterone level ≤ 50 ng/dL. Results: Overall 25 consecutive patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with iADT with relugolix were eligible and included. The median age was 75 [range 68-88]. Patients with a Gleason score of ≥ 8 comprised 44% of the cohort. The median PSA at the start of therapy was 18.2 ng/ml [5.1 – 99.1 ng/ml]. Median time to testosterone ≤ 50 ng/dl after relugolix initiation was 1.13 months [0.67 – 2.5 months], and median time to testosterone recovery after relugolix discontinuation was 1.4 months [0.83 – 6.57 months]. The median PSA nadir achieved with relugolix was 2.02 ng/ml [0.1 – 4.8], and median time to PSA nadir was 1.35 months from initiation of therapy (0.67 – 4.8 months). Median time to PSA relapse ≥ 10 ng/dl after holding relugolix was 3.4 months (0.9 – 8.23 months). Conclusions: This is the first real-world study to show that iADT with relugolix is associated with a rapid time to testosterone suppression and recovery. These results may guide patients’ counseling, monitoring of serum testosterone and PSA levels in patients wishing to pursue iADT for advanced prostate cancer. These hypothesis-generating data need external validation.

EORTC GUCG 2238 De-escalate: A pragmatic trial to revisit intermittent androgen-deprivation therapy in metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer in the era of new AR pathway inhibitors.

EORTC GUCG 2238 De-escalate: A pragmatic trial to revisit intermittent androgen-deprivation therapy in metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer in the era of new AR pathway inhibitors.

Deep reinforcement learning identifies personalized intermittent androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

The evolution of drug resistance leads to treatment failure and tumor progression. Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (IADT) helps responsive cancer cells compete with resistant cancer cells in intratumoral competition. However, conventional IADT is population-based, ignoring the heterogeneity of patients and cancer. Additionally, existing IADT relies on pre-determined thresholds of prostate-specific antigen to pause and resume treatment, which is not optimized for individual patients. To address these challenges, we framed a data-driven method in two steps. First, we developed a time-varied, mixed-effect and generative Lotka-Volterra (tM-GLV) model to account for the heterogeneity of the evolution mechanism and the pharmacokinetics of two ADT drugs Cyproterone acetate and Leuprolide acetate for individual patients. Then, we proposed a reinforcement-learning-enabled individualized IADT framework, namely, I$^{2}$ADT, to learn the patient-specific tumor dynamics and derive the optimal drug administration policy. Experiments with clinical trial data demonstrated that the proposed I$^{2}$ADT can significantly prolong the time to progression of prostate cancer patients with reduced cumulative drug dosage. We further validated the efficacy of the proposed methods with a recent pilot clinical trial data. Moreover, the adaptability of I$^{2}$ADT makes it a promising tool for other cancers with the availability of clinical data, where treatment regimens might need to be individualized based on patient characteristics and disease dynamics. Our research elucidates the application of deep reinforcement learning to identify personalized adaptive cancer therapy.

Updates on Management of Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) are a heterogeneous group, whereby a personalized approach to management is critical. Patients with high-risk features such as PSA doubling time (PSADT) ≤ 9-12 months warrant earlier imaging for metastasis detection and consideration for intensified therapy (beyond intermittent androgen deprivation alone) during this phase of BCR-only disease. The BCR phase represents a unique opportunity to impact disease survival and delay metastasis progression. There is compelling evidence from the EMBARK trial that ADT monotherapy is no longer the optimal consideration for high-risk BCR patients.

Abstract C017: Comparing prostate specific antigen dynamics between Black patients and White patients

Abstract Black men have the highest prostate cancer (PCa) mortality across all US population groups. We hypothesize that this may be the result of low participation from black men in clinical trials and socioeconomic facotrs. We use a simple mathematical model to investigate differences in PSA dynamics between black and white men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The model was calibrated to longitudinal PSA data from 57 PCa patients (N = 47 white, N = 10 black) receiving continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). To compensate for the lack of data for black patients, propensity score matching was used to select 15 white patients that were most alike to the 10 black patients based on their Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, age, and tumor burden. Using a previously developed model of stem cell, non-stem, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dynamics, parameter analysis and leave-one-out process were used to determine which parameters should be uniform among all patients and which should be patient-specific to determine if any parameters showed a significant difference. Each patient’s parameter values were used to see if intermittent ADT (IADT) or adaptive ADT could extend the time to progression and narrow disparity gaps. We then sampled from the parameter distributions to create 50 black and 50 white in-silico patients to simulate continuous and intermittent ADT to further validate our results. The leave-one-out analysis found that a uniform ADT cytotoxicity resulted in the best Akaike Information Criteria score for black and white patients. A nested optimization was subsequently used to determine race-specific uniform cytotoxicity rates, while the remaining patient-specific parameters were determined. Statistical analysis found that black patients had a significantly higher stem cell self-renewal rate than the white patients. We hypothesize that this is primarily responsible for earlier progression in black patients. Simulations of continuous and intermittent ADT for real and in-silico patients showed that IADT and adaptive ADT can extend the time to progression (TTP) for both black and white patients. The TTP was extended by 50% for the black patients, and 25% for the white patients, thus the black patients had a greater benefit. However, the median TTP for black patients on IADT was less than that for white patients on continuous ADT. This suggests that further investigation of different treatments needs to be done to close disparity gaps. Our results show that stem cell self-renewal is driving differences in PSA dynamics between white and black patients. Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy could potentially be a step in addressing the higher stem-cell self-renewal rate in black patients and narrowing the health disparity gap between black and white Pca patients. This valuable information can be used in the future to design race-specific treatment modalities to maximally delay time to progression. Citation Format: Alexandria Johnson, Renee Brady. Comparing prostate specific antigen dynamics between Black patients and White patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C017.

Intermittent Versus Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Biochemical Progression After Primary Therapy in Hormone-Sensitive Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Comparative Analysis in Terms of CRPC-M0 Progression

IntroductionTo analyze whether the use of an intermittent (IAD) versus continuous (CAD) androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of biochemical progression after primary treatments in prostate cancer can influence the development of nonmetastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC-M0). Patients170 male patients with an histologically confirmed diagnosis of PC, presenting a biochemical progression after primary treatments (82 after radical prostatectomy and 88 after external radiation therapy), nonmetastatic at imaging were considered for continuous (85 cases) or intermittent (85 cases) administration of androgen deprivation therapy. Methodswe retrospectively collect all data regarding histological diagnosis, primary treatment, imaging for M0-M1 staging, PSA at progression, time to biochemical progression from primary therapy, ADT used, IAD cycles, so to compare in 2 groups (IAD vs. CAD) time for progression from the beginning of ADT treatment and type of progression in terms of CRPC-M0 versus CRPC-M1 cases. Resultsno significant (P= .4955) difference in the whole CRPC progression was found between IAD (25.8%) and CAD (30.5%) treatment at a mean of 32.7 ± 7.02 months and 35.6 ± 13.1 months respectively (P= .0738). Mean PSA at CRPC development was significantly higher in the IAD group (5.16 ± 0.68 ng/mL) than in the CAD group (3.1 ± 0.7 ng/mL) (P < .001). In all cases, imaging to detect M status at CRPC development was PET TC scan. At univariate analysis CAD administration significantly increases the RR for CRPC-M0 progression (RR 3.48; 95%CI 1.66-7.29; P = .01) when compared to the IAD administration, and this effect at multivariate analysis remained significant and independent to the other variables (RR 2.34, 95%CI 1.52-5.33; P = .03). Conclusionsin our population with biochemical progression after primary treatment for PC, the intermittent administration of ADT significantly reduces the risk to develop CRPC-M0 disease when compared to a continuous administration of ADT, whereas no difference between the 2 strategies in terms of CRPC-M1 progression exists.

Comparison of Intermittent and Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients: An Up-to-Date Meta-analysis for Urologists and Medical Providers.

Androgen deprivation therapy first became the treatment of choice for advanced prostate cancer in the 1940s with Charles Huggins' discoveries. Eight decades later, androgen deprivation therapy has significantly evolved, and yet is still utilized in various ways to treat certain forms of prostate cancer. For local recurrence after failed primary treatment and for locally advanced and metastatic disease, continuous androgen deprivation therapy has been standard of treatment. However, intermittent androgen deprivation therapy has emerged as a therapeutic alternative to continuous androgen deprivation therapy. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to provide an update on mortality, specifically prostate cancer-specific and nonprostate cancer causes, in order to offer some guidance when selecting the appropriate form of systemic androgen deprivation therapy. The PubMed database was searched for prospective randomized clinical trials. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. Using statistical software, we analyzed random-effects models with the assumption that the data were randomly sampled, estimated the pooled log risk ratio, assessed heterogeneity, and created funnel plots to evaluate publication bias. A total of 12 randomized clinical trials met all inclusion criteria for final analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in prostate cancer-specific mortality between intermittent androgen deprivation therapy and continuous androgen deprivation therapy (RR=1.10 [0.85-1.42]). The analysis of nonprostate cancer mortality favored intermittent androgen deprivation therapy over continuous androgen deprivation therapy, but the difference was statistically insignificant (RR=0.94 [0.76-1.17]). These 2 treatment modalities can be considered as equivalent in long-term treatment outcomes. As intermittent androgen deprivation therapy is more cost-efficient and less likely to yield adverse side effects, future treatment guidelines should consider these advantages over continuous androgen deprivation therapy.

A meta-analysis of local-regional therapy (LRT) in liver metastases from genitourinary cancers.

e16606 Background: Liver metastases (Mets) from genitourinary cancers are difficult to treat and many of them are resistant to systemic therapy. Local-Regional Therapies (LRT) are becoming popular in treating Liver Mets. In this Meta-analysis, we analyze the outcomes of LRT for Liver Mets from Genitourinary Cancers. Methods: We searched PubMed, Google scholar for case reports, case studies, retrospective studies with patients who underwent LRT like Radiofrequency Ablation (RF), Chemoembolization (CE), Microwave Ablation (MA), Cryoablation for liver metastases for from Genitourinary Cancers including Prostate Cancer (PC), Testicular Cancer (TC) and Renal Cell Cancer (RCC). We also included 3 patients from Dignity Health Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ. Results: Total number of patients in the study is 54, 3 of them from our Center. 39 are men and 15 are women. Mean and median age of the patients was 62.3, 65 years respectively. Number of patients with RCC, PC, TC are 43, 6, 5 respectively. 28 patients had CE, 23 had RFA and 3 had MA with the total number of procedures being 144, 41 and 5 respectively. Mean survival for all the patients is 62.7 months, mean survival for RCC, TC and PC are 68.9, 45.8 and 24.4 months respectively. Median number of systemic therapies received by the patients prior to getting LRT was 2 (range 1-4). We used RECIST criteria to quantify the benefit from LRT, 23 patients had Complete Response (CR), 6 had Partial Response (PR), 14 had Stable Disease (SD) and 8 had Progressive Disease (PD), there was no data for 2 patients. 43 patients had Clinical Benefit. We present a case of castration resistant metastatic PC from our facility. A 78-year man diagnosed metastatic PC in 2007 who had Prostatectomy, salvage radiation, intermittent androgen deprivation and Combined deprivation therapy. But his PSA continued to rise, flutamide was added. In 2017, he had liver metastasis, had RFA twice for 2 liver lesions and had CR. He continues to be on relugolix with good quality of life. Patients in the study are people with advanced metastatic cancer who underwent various systemic therapies like chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy and hormonal therapy prior to getting the LRT. LRT was done as the patients failed or did not tolerate systemic therapies. The mean survival for RCC patients in the study group is greater than the average survival of stage IV RCC, the lower mean survival for PC and TC can be explained by the limited number of this patient population in the study. Conclusions: Combination of LRT with systemic therapy for previously heavily treated Liver Mets from genitourinary cancers is a promising strategy for patients with otherwise poor prognosis. [Table: see text]

Uncommon Manifestation of Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Sister Mary Joseph Nodule.

A 76-year-old man with a history of prostate cancer diagnosed in 2008 developed biochemical recurrence in 2010 and started intermittent androgen deprivation therapy. In 2021, due to rising prostate-specific antigen, an 18 F-piflufolastat PSMA PET/CT was performed. It showed a radiotracer-avid sclerotic lesion in the right iliac bone and an indeterminate radiotracer-avid nodule in the umbilical region, demonstrating progressive enlargement and increased uptake on subsequent imaging. Pathologic analysis of the umbilical nodule revealed metastatic prostate cancer-a finding eponymically referred to as a Sister Mary Joseph nodule.

Association of intermittent or continuous androgen deprivation therapy with cardiovascular disease and endocrine/metabolic disorders in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

83 Background: Evidence on risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and endocrine/metabolic disorders associated with long-term intermittent and continuous androgen deprivation therapy (iADT and cADT, respectively) in patients (pts) with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (nmPC) is mixed. This real-world study examined these risks in pts with nmPC receiving iADT or cADT in the US. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of SEER-Medicare pts with nmPC initiating ADT (2010–2017), with ≥36 months of continuous insurance coverage, unless death occurred, and who did not receive chemotherapy or a second-generation anti-androgen during follow-up. iADT and cADT cohorts were defined by treatment patterns and gaps in therapy. Comorbidities and clinical events were identified using ICD-9/10-CM codes. Outcomes examined were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE [myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiomyopathy/heart failure (HF), pulmonary embolism (PE), ischemic heart disease (IHD), or all-cause mortality]) and endocrine/metabolic events (diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, bone fractures, or osteoporosis). Inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox regression models estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of the outcomes. Subgroup analyses examined pts by CVD history. A sensitivity analysis restricted the definition of MACE to include CVD-related mortality as a component, i.e., MACESA (MI, stroke, cardiomyopathy/HF, PE, IHD, or CVD-related mortality). Results: 10,655 pts were included; 2095 (20%) received iADT and 8560 (80%) cADT; 63% of iADT pts and 66% of cADT pts had baseline CVD history. Median follow-up was 44 and 48 months and time on ADT (excluding gaps for iADT pts) was 23 and 17 months for the iADT and cADT cohorts, respectively. In adjusted analyses, pts receiving cADT had a lower risk of MACE vs iADT. No difference in risk of endocrine/metabolic events was observed. Results for MACE were similar in pts with prior CVD history; however, there was no difference in risk of MACE in those without CVD history. Sensitivity analysis results for MACESA were similar to the main results. Conclusions: Pts with nmPC receiving cADT had a lower risk of MACE, and no difference in risk of endocrine/metabolic events, compared with iADT. There was no difference in risk of MACE in pts without a prior history of CVD. [Table: see text]

Association of intermittent vs continuous androgen deprivation therapy with cardiovascular disease and endocrine/metabolic disorders in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

82 Background: There is mixed evidence on the risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and endocrine/metabolic disorders associated with long-term intermittent and continuous androgen deprivation therapy (iADT and cADT, respectively) for metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). This study examined these risks in patients (pts) with mPC receiving iADT vs cADT in the US. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of SEER-Medicare pts with mPC initiating ADT (2010–2017), with ≥36 months of continuous insurance coverage, unless death occurred, who did not receive chemotherapy or a second-generation anti-androgen during follow-up. iADT and cADT cohorts were defined by treatment patterns and gaps in therapy. Comorbidities and clinical events were identified using ICD-9/10-CM codes. Outcomes examined were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE [myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiomyopathy/heart failure (HF), pulmonary embolism (PE), ischemic heart disease (IHD), or all-cause mortality]) and endocrine/metabolic events (diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, bone fractures, or osteoporosis). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for differences between cohorts; weighted Cox models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of the outcomes. Subgroup analyses examined pts by CVD history; a sensitivity analysis was performed restricting the definition of MACE to include CVD-related mortality as a component, i.e., MACESA (MI, stroke, cardiomyopathy/HF, PE, IHD, or CVD-related mortality). Results: 2234 pts with mPC were included; 478 (21%) received iADT and 1756 (79%) cADT. Median follow-up time was 27 and 13 months, and time on ADT (excluding gaps for iADT pts) was 24 and 19 months for the iADT and cADT cohorts, respectively. Deaths occurred in 39% of iADT pts vs 55% of cADT pts; PC was the most common cause of death in both cohorts. In adjusted analyses, pts receiving cADT had a higher risk of MACE vs iADT. No differences in risk of endocrine/metabolic events were observed. Subgroup analysis showed that baseline history of CVD did not alter the results for MACE. Sensitivity analysis results showed no difference in risk of MACESA between pts receiving cADT vs iADT. Conclusions: Pts with mPC receiving cADT had a higher risk of MACE (including all-cause mortality), and no difference in risk of endocrine/metabolic events, compared with those receiving iADT. When MACE was restricted to include CVD-related mortality, there was no difference in risk between cohorts. [Table: see text]

Intermittent Androgen Deprivation for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: First Do No Harm

Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer and biochemical relapse does not prolong survival or improve quality of life.

Palliative TURP Combined with Intermittent ADT Is A Curative Therapy to Some Elderly Men with Localized Prostate Adenocarcinoma.

Background: Radical prostatectomy is the preferred therapeutic option for patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma whose life expectancy is greater than 10 years. But for elderly patients, this may not be the best option. In clinical work, we have observed that palliative transurethral resection of prostate (pTURP) combined with intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has achieved significant good results in the treatment of elderly patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 30 elderly patients aged 71 to 88 years who were hospitalized for urinary retention from March 2009 to March 2015. These patients were diagnosed as localized prostate adenocarcinoma with stage T1 to T2 and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) through MRI and prostate biopsy. Fifteen cases (group A) were given pTURP and intermittent ADT after surgery. Fifteen cases (group B) were given sustained ADT. Serum total prostate specific antigen (TPSA), testosterone, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), prostate acid phosphatase (PAP), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life (QOL) score, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), average urinary flow rate (Qave), prostate volume and post-void residual urine (PVR) data were followed up for 5 years, and the differences between the two groups were compared. Results: The 5-year cumulative survival rate of group A was 100%. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival was 60.00%. The average duration of intermittent ADT was 23.93 months. Prostate volume reduction was significantly. The dysuria in all patients was significantly improved. Nine patients had TPSA lower than 4 ng/ml and had no local progression and metastasis. At the same time the 5-year cumulative survival rate of group B was 80%. PSA progression-free survival was 26.67%. Six cases of dysuria improved. There was no significant difference in serum TPSA, ALP and PAP between the two groups in five years (P>0.05). Serum testosterone, IPSS score, QOL score, prostate volume, Qmax, Qave, and PVR were significantly different between the two groups in five years (P<0.05). Conclusion: pTURP for elderly patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma and BPH combined with intermittent ADT is an effective treatment. It is able to solve dysuria. The overall ADT time is short. The risk of progression to castrated resistant prostate cancer is low. Some of them have achieved tumor-free survival.

Stationary distribution and persistence of a stochastic mathematical model for prostate cancer with pulsed therapy

Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy is one of the most commonly used therapeutic regimens for treating prostate cancer. Immunotherapy with dendritic cells, which act as the most robust antigen-presenting cells, are regarded as an effective method for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. This paper utilizes impulsive differential equations to describe the combinations of a dendritic cell vaccine and intermittent androgen therapy with white noise. The tumour-free solution is obtained and the unique global positive solution of the system is explored. Then it is proved that the solutions of the system are stochastic ultimately bounded and stochastically permanent. In addition, threshold conditions for the extinction and persistence of prostate cancer cells are derived, and the stationary distribution and ergodicity of the system are investigated. Finally, numerical studies and the biological significance of the results are discussed.

Dynamics of a non-smooth model of prostate cancer with intermittent androgen deprivation therapy

Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (IADT) is widely used in the clinic treatment for prostate cancer. We propose a Filippov system in this paper, which defines the following threshold policy: the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is implemented once the concentration of androgen-dependent (AD) cells exceeds the threshold level ET and it is suspended otherwise. To better understand the effect of the IADT on the evolution of prostate cancer, we perform a comprehensive qualitative analysis of global dynamics of the targeted model. As the threshold value varies, our model admits multistability of three equilibria, bistability of two equilibria, stability of the regular equilibrium or the pseudo-equilibrium, and the boundary equilibrium bifurcation. The steady-state regimes include high concentration, low concentration and no androgen-independent cells. This highlights the critical role of threshold values and the initial condition of prostate cancer cells of patients. The main results indicate that the concentration of AD cells and AI cells can be contained at a relatively satisfactory level, which can help to make treatment schedule and improve treatment outcomes for patients with prostate cancer.

Relugolix in the management of prostate cancer

ABSTRACT Introduction Relugolix is the first oral gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist. Based on the phase III HERO trial results, relugolix received Food and Drug Administration approval for adult patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Areas covered We provide an overview of the preclinical and clinical development of relugolix and its role in the current treatment landscape of PCa. Expert opinion Relugolix leads to rapid inhibition of testicular production of testosterone and its rapid recovery upon discontinuation. In the HERO trial, relugolix was associated with a superior cardiovascular safety profile compared to GnRH agonists. These attributes make relugolix a promising therapy for patients with preexisting cardiovascular comorbidities, those pursuing intermittent androgen deprivation therapy, and those who desire rapid testosterone recovery during ‘off-treatment’ periods. In the HERO trial, very few patients received concomitant enzalutamide (n = 17, 2.7%) or docetaxel (n < 10, 1.3%). Safety of relugolix has not been established in combination with many androgen-receptor-axis targeted therapies (e.g. abiraterone, apalutamide), cabazitaxel, or lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan, which precludes its use in combination with these agents. In addition, being an oral drug, relugolix may also be associated with challenges of affordability, adherence, and compliance in this predominantly elderly population.