Interleukin-17 Inhibitors Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in European patients with palmoplantar pustulosis: A multi-center, single-arm clinical trial (GAP study)

BackgroundPalmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that affects palms and soles. Patients suffer significant pain, itching and daily activity impairment. Guselkumab, an interleukin-23 inhibitor, has been approved for PPP treatment in Japan. However, there is no effective therapy licensed for PPP in Europe and the USA. ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe PPP in the Caucasian population. MethodsA multicenter, single-arm, phase II study involving 50 patients with moderate-to-severe PPP treated with 100 mg guselkumab subcutaneously for 24 weeks was conducted (GAP). Primary endpoint was the reduction of palmoplantar-pustulosis psoriasis area and severity index (PPPASI) at week 24 compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints included physician-assessed and patient-reported measures. Serum samples were taken for exploratory studies. ResultsThe primary endpoint was met with a significant median PPPASI reduction by 59.6% at week 24 compared to baseline (p<0.001). The proportions of patients achieving PPPASI-50 and PPPASI-75 at week 24 were 66.0% and 34.0%, respectively. Median DLQI dropped from 15 at baseline to 5 at week 24 (p<0.001). Week-4 changes in IL-19 serum levels predicted week-24 clinical response. ConclusionGuselkumab may be a promising therapeutic option for PPP in Caucasian patients.

S1174 Interleukin-12/23 vs Interleukin-23 Inhibitors in Moderate to Severe Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

S1174 Interleukin-12/23 vs Interleukin-23 Inhibitors in Moderate to Severe Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

S1173 Efficacy and Safety of Interleukin-12, 23 Inhibitors vs Interleukin-23 inhibitors for Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

S1173 Efficacy and Safety of Interleukin-12, 23 Inhibitors vs Interleukin-23 inhibitors for Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

A Review of Interleukin-23/Interleukin-17 Inhibitor Exposure during Pregnancy in Patients with Psoriasis

Psoriasis is an immune cell-mediated chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease that often develops during the reproductive years of women. The treatment of psoriasis during pregnancy is challenging as remarkable changes occur in the maternal body, and it requires the selection of therapy which is safe for both mother and fetus. The use of interleukin-23 (IL-23)/IL-17 inhibitors has been growing in psoriasis disease management and so the risk of their exposure during pregnancy is increasing too. However, human safety data in pregnancy are limited. This article aims to review pregnancy outcomes associated with IL-23/IL-17 inhibitor exposure in psoriasis patients and to see possible therapeutic options for psoriasis treatment during pregnancy. A search of the PubMed database up to June 2023 for articles was performed. The search strategy included a combination of terms as (pregnancy) AND (psoriasis) AND (Ustekinumab)/(Secukinumab)/(ixekizumab)/(brodalumab)/(guselkumab)/(tildrakizumab)/(risankizumab)/IL-23 inhibitors/IL-17 inhibitors. Resulted articles were reviewed manually for case reports, exposures from registries, and clinical trials. Most of the exposures to IL-23/IL-17 inhibitors were inadvertent, and therapy was suspended upon the detection of pregnancy. No signals on miscarriages, spontaneous abortions, and adverse developmental outcomes have been reported with first-trimester exposures to IL-23/IL-17 inhibitors. However, benefit–risk profile cannot be extrapolated based on first-trimester exposure as the transfer of these biologics across the placenta occurs in the later stage of pregnancy. More safety data from large cohorts of full-term exposure are required for IL-23/IL-17 inhibitors to consider them safe therapeutic options during pregnancy.

Expert views on screening for tuberculosis infection in patients commencing treatment with a biologic agent.

Many biologic agents cause some degree of immunosuppression, which can increase the risk of reactivation of tuberculosis infection (TBI). This risk is variable between individual biologics. We aimed to assess current (and recommended) clinical practice of TBI screening and treatment among patients initiating treatment with biologic agents. An online questionnaire was distributed via email to members of the Global Tuberculosis Network and associated professional organisations to seek insights into the screening for and treatment of TBI in patients treated with biologics. A total of 163 respondents in 27 countries answered at least one question. For all biologics described in the questionnaire, respondents advised increasing screening relative to current practice. Observed and supported TBI screening rates in patients treated with TNF-a inhibitors were high, especially for older TNF-a inhibitors. Most participants supported TBI screening in patients treated with B- or T-cell inhibitors but not in those treated with interleukin inhibitors. Guideline awareness was higher for TNF-a inhibitors than for other biologic classes (79% vs. 34%). Although respondents stated that TBI screening rates are lower than what they consider ideal, there was a tendency to recommend TBI screening in patients treated with biologics not known to be associated with an increased risk of TBI. As a result, there is a potential risk of over-screening and over-treatment of TBI, potentially causing harm, in patients treated with biologics other than TNF-a inhibitors. There is a need to research the risk of TBI associated with biologics and for guidelines to address the spectrum of TBI risk across all types of biologics.

Predicting the Time to Relapse Following Withdrawal from Different Biologics in Patients with Psoriasis who Responded to Therapy: A 12-Year Multicenter Cohort Study.

For patients with psoriasis, discontinuation of biologics following remission has become more common in daily practice. We aimed to identify predictors and construct a predictive model for time to relapse following withdrawal from biologics. This 12-year, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed in six dermatology centers between February 2011 and February 2024. We identified biological treatment episodes in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and included only treatment episodes in which a clinical response (≥50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score [PASI 50] from baseline) was achieved and the patient withdrew from biological therapy with a well-controlled status (PASI <10 and ≥50% improvement in PASI from baseline). The primary outcome was time to relapse, which was defined as the period from the last biologic administration to relapse. An extended multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (Prentice-Williams-Peterson Gap time model) was used to predict relapse and generate a predictive model. This study screened 1613 biological treatment episodes, and 991 treatment episodes were enrolled. The time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment increased (p < 0.001). Similarly, the time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous biologics used increased (p < 0.001). The maximum PASI improvement during biological treatment decreased and the PASI score at withdrawal of biological treatment increased in parallel as the number of prior withdrawals from biologics increased. The time to relapse following withdrawal was longest for interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors (IL-23i), followed by the IL-12/23i, IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. After adjustment, multivariate Cox regression identified the following significant predictors of relapse following withdrawal: the mechanisms of action of biologics (hazard ratio [HR] for IL-17i vs IL-12/23i, 1.59; HR for IL-23i vs IL-12/23i, 0.60), number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment (HR 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13‒1.33), time to achieve PASI 50 (HR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00‒1.02), maximum PASI improvement on biologics (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.98‒0.99), and PASI at the end of therapy (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01‒1.05). The model had good predictive and discriminative ability. These results have the potential to help physicians and patients make individualized treatment decisions; information on the risk of relapse of psoriasis at specific timepoints following the withdrawal of biologics is particularly valuable for patients considering discontinuation of biologics or as-needed biologic therapy. However, the benefit and risk of repeated withdrawals of biologics should be carefully weighed, as the treatment efficacy and duration of remission decline as the number of withdrawals increases.

Do interleukin-17 and interleukin-23 inhibitors alter the coagulation parameters in psoriasis patients?: A retrospective study.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition associated with systemic inflammation and a higher risk of cardiovascular comorbidities. This study retrospectively evaluates coagulation parameters in psoriasis vulgaris patients treated with IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab) and IL-23 inhibitors (risankizumab, guselkumab), compared to those untreated systemically. The study reviewed records from 177 patients treated between January 2019 and March 2023. Patients were grouped into control (n = 77), secukinumab (n = 36), ixekizumab (n = 19), guselkumab (n = 24), and risankizumab (n = 21). Coagulation parameters, including PT, aPTT, PLT, MPV, INR, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and B12 levels, were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the comparison of coagulation parameters between groups. Significant differences were found in PT, with secukinumab-treated patients showing a significantly shorter PT compared to controls (p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in other coagulation parameters across the groups. The study highlights a potential effect of secukinumab on coagulation pathways, possibly related to IL-17's role in inflammation and endothelial function. Despite current literature suggest a risk of cerebrovascular events with risankizumab, this study did not show any significant changes in coagulation parameters with risankizumab, indicating no hypercoagulability risk associated with this IL-23 inhibitor. Our findings suggest IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors are generally safe concerning coagulation parameters, but regular monitoring may be warranted for patients on secukinumab due to its effect on PT. Further long-term studies are needed to fully understand the cardiovascular risks associated with these therapies.

54148 Characteristics of Real-world Patients With Psoriasis Prescribed Guselkumab or Interleukin-17 Inhibitors: Data From the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR)

54148 Characteristics of Real-world Patients With Psoriasis Prescribed Guselkumab or Interleukin-17 Inhibitors: Data From the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR)

Candidate Biomarkers For Response To Treatment In Psoriatic Disease.

To determine whether biologic therapy alters serum CXCL10, MMP3, S100A8, ACP5, and CCL2 levels in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis (PsC) patients, and whether baseline levels of these proteins predict response to treatment for PsA. We included PsA patients on TNF inhibitors (TNFi), Interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), methotrexate (MTX), and untreated with bDMARDs or csDMARDs (untreated) and PsC patients on bDMARDs and matched untreated. Serum samples at baseline and 3-6 months follow-up were retrieved from the biobank. Protein levels were quantified using a Luminex multiplex assay. We compared follow-up vs baseline protein levels within groups and change in levels between groups. For the predictive potential of the biomarkers, we developed logistic regression classification models. Response to treatment was defined as: 1. Achieving low disease activity or remission (according to DAPSA), 2. 75% reduction in PASI, and 3. 50% reduction in actively inflamed joint count. In PsA, TNFi reduced serum levels of all five proteins, IL-17i increased ACP5 and CCL2, and MTX reduced MMP3. Changes in MMP3 and S100A8 levels were significantly different between untreated PsA and matched biologic-treated PsA (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between treated or untreated PsC patients. Baseline levels of CXCL10, MMP3, S100A8, and ACP5 had good predictive value (AUC>0.8) for response to biologics in PsA patients. Biologics treatment and MTX affect serum CXCL10, MMP3, S100A8, ACP5, and CCL2 levels in PsA patients. MMP3, S100A8, ACP5, and CXCL10 have potential use as serum biomarkers to predict response to treatment for PsA.

Sequencing of Targeted Therapy in Psoriasis: Does it Matter?

With the continued development of biologics for the treatment of psoriasis, some patients have achieved optimal control, but a recommended biologic sequence if a biologic fails to initially improve the skin, termed primary nonresponse, or loses efficacy after initial improvement, termed secondary nonresponse, is still lacking. Primary and secondary nonresponse can occur with any class of biologics, and the type of nonresponse can drive the choice of whether to switch within a biologic class or to a different biologic class. The choice of biologic can also be challenging when managing psoriasis and concomitant psoriatic arthritis, as treatment differs on the basis of the severity of both diseases and further classification of axial and peripheral joint involvement. When choosing a biologic, each patient's comorbidities and preferences are also taken into account to provide the optimal therapy. With this lack of anestablishedbiologic sequence after biologic failure, the objective of our review is to define a therapy sequence for the tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-17 (IL-17), and interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor classes in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Our proposed biologic sequence was derived through an analysis of the efficacy of each biologic class, primary and secondary nonresponse rates from clinical trials, and clinical experience with expert opinion.

54665 The Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Different Biologics To Interleukin-23 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review

54665 The Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Different Biologics To Interleukin-23 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review

Tocilizumab reduces hypercoagulation in COVID-19 – Perspectives from the coagulation and immunomodulation Covid assessment (Coag-ImmCovA) clinical trial

BackgroundDespite medical interventions, COVID-19 continues to persist at pandemic proportions. A hypercoagulation state was rapidly observed in the severely ill, and the incidence of thromboembolic events remains elevated. Interleukin inhibitors have demonstrated positive effects on the hyperactivation of the immune system in COVID-19, with the interleukin-6 inhibitor tocilizumab showing promising results in reducing mortality. Nevertheless, the impact of interleukin inhibitors on the coagulation system remains incompletely understood. MethodsIn this clinical trial conducted in Stockholm, Sweden, interleukin inhibitors, namely anakinra (ANA) or tocilizumab (TOCI), were randomly administered in addition to standard care (SC) to hospitalized patients with COVID-19. A control group received only SC. The primary outcome sought to measure effects on global hemostasis, as indicated by changes in functional coagulation tests, specifically Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) or Overall Hemostatic Potential (OHP), visualized through scanning electron microscopy images. Secondary outcomes included effects on conventional coagulation laboratory tests. ResultsThe study enrolled 74 patients who were randomized to receive either ANA or TOCI in addition to SC, or SC alone. In the TOCI group, ROTEM variables exhibited less hypercoagulation after 29 days compared with ANA or SC treatment groups, characterized by prolonged clot formation time and decreased clot firmness. OHP decreased, but there were no significant differences among the three treatment groups. Plasma fibrinogen levels, initially elevated, decreased significantly in TOCI recipients over time. ConclusionTocilizumab treatment demonstrated a significant reduction of hypercoagulation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, by improvements in both global coagulation tests and conventional laboratory tests, in comparison with anakinra or SC alone. This finding underscores the significance of tocilizumab as a viable treatment option in severe COVID-19 cases, with the potential to decrease thrombosis incidence.

Efficacy and Safety of Interleukin-12/23 and Interleukin-23 Inhibitors for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review Ad Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Targeting interleukin-23 (IL-23) represents a significant therapeutic avenue for treating ulcerative colitis (UC). What are the effectiveness and safety of selective inhibitors targeting IL-23p19 and IL-12/23p40 in individuals with moderate-to-severe UC? MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases till January 15, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing IL-23p19 and IL-12/23p40 inhibitors against placebo or active comparators in UC patients. The primary outcome was clinical remission, with secondary outcomes including clinical response, endoscopic remission, and safety profiles during induction and maintenance phases. Using a fixed-effect model, we pooled dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for analysis. In 5 trials involving 1120 patients with moderate to severe UC, targeting IL-23 showed significant superiority in inducing clinical remission [RR: 2.08, 95% CI, (1.66-2.61)], endoscopic remission [RR: 1.73, 95% CI, (1.39-2.16)], and histologic remission [RR: 1.88, 95% CI, (1.34-2.64)]. Additionally, individuals treated with IL-12/23p40 or IL-23p19 antagonists maintained clinical remission [RR: 1.85, 95% CI, (1.53-2.23)], endoscopic remission [RR: 2.03, 95% CI, (1.60-2.57)], and histologic remission [RR: 1.66, 95% CI, (1.11-2.48)]. Targeting IL-23 was linked with a reduced risk of any adverse events (AE) during both induction [RR: 0.94, 95% CI, (0.86-1.02)] and maintenance phases [RR: 0.93, 95% CI, (0.86-0.99)], any serious AE during the induction phase [RR: 0.53, 95% CI, (0.36-0.78)], and withdrawal due to AEs compared to patients receiving placebo during induction [RR: 0.24, 95% CI (0.14, 0.43)]. Targeting IL-23 demonstrates efficacy and safety for inducing and maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission in moderate-to-severe UC patients.

Efficacy and safety of biotechnological drugs for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the elderly population: a single-center, Italian experience.

Demographic changes impose a number of issues regarding the biological treatment of elderly patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. A retrospective, single-center study was conducted on patients aged 65 years or older with moderate-severe psoriasis who had been undergoing treatment with biologic drugs for at least 60 weeks. A total of 168 patients aged 65 years or older with moderate-to-severe psoriasis undergoing biologic therapy were retrieved: 45 were women and with a mean age of 73.23 ± 6.53 years. The decline in mean PASI, BSA, DLQI and NAPSI values over the 60 weeks of treatment was found to be statistically significant at each interval (p < 0.05). Multivariate statistical analysis showed that nearly all the considered independent variables did not influence the response to therapy in terms of PASI score reduction, except for psoriatic arthritis (p = 0.03). We observed a better response by YOs, with 72.84% of subjects achieving PASI 75 and 71.6% achieving PASI 90 and 100 at the 60th week of treatment. The worst result was obtained by the MOs, with 60 percent of subjects reaching PASI 75 at the end of follow-up, while the OOs had a more mixed performance. The results obtained seem to indicate greater efficacy of anti-TNFα drugs, followed by the other classes of interleukin inhibitors. These results could provide a starting point for new and larger studies and guidelines for biologic treatment.

Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in VEXAS syndrome.

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) is a newly diagnosed syndrome comprising severe systemic inflammatory and hematological manifestations including myelodysplastic syndrome and plasma cell dyscrasia. Since its discovery four years ago, several groups have identified pleomorphic clinical phenotypes, but few effective medical therapies exist which include Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors, interleukin inhibitors (IL-1 and IL-6), and hypomethylating agents. Prospective trials are lacking at this time and most patients remain corticosteroid dependent. VEXAS has a high morbidity from frequent life threatening inflammatory symptoms and risk of progression to hematological malignancies and has an overall survival of 50% at 10 years. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) is a curative option for this disease caused by somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. Here we outline the role of allo-HCT in treating patients with VEXAS syndrome, highlighting the outcomes from several single-institution studies and case reports. Prospective trials will be required to precisely define the role of allo-HCT in the management of VEXAS syndrome.

Head-to-head studies on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Given the ever-increasing number of approved therapies for the treatment of psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), head-to-head (H2H) comparative studies are essential. These are aimed primarily at acomparative analysis of treatment effectiveness. In both PsO and PsA, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) have been shown to be superior to conventional therapies in H2H studies. In PsO interleukin 17 (IL-17) and IL-23 inhibitors proved superiority compared to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (etanercept and adalimumab) in several studies. Ustekinumab was more effective than etanercept, but less effective than IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Only afew H2H studies have been published on the treatment of PsA. In the Spirit H2H study ixekizumab was superior to adalimumab using acombined endpoint of arthritis and psoriasis response (ACR-50 and PASI-100). When looking at arthritic symptoms only (ACR-20), secukinumab was not significantly superior to adalimumab in the EXCEED study but was superior in terms of the effect on skin involvement (PASI90). Other H2H studies focused on the treatment of enthesitis (ECLIPSA study), the efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition (SELECT-PSA-1) or the additional administration of methotrexate to bDMARD treatment (MUST study). The H2H data have been incorporated into the treatment guidelines and have led to IL-17 and IL-23 inhibition being preferred over TNF inhibition in cases of relevant skin involvement in PsA.

Analysis of the shorter drug survival times for Janus kinase inhibitors and interleukin-17 inhibitors compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in a real-world cohort of axial spondyloarthritis patients - a retrospective analysis from the RHADAR network

In recent years Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have joined tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) as approved disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) for moderate to severe forms of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Drug survival in axSpA patients has not been well studied in a real-world outpatient scenario since the approval of JAKi. We aimed to analyze the three drug classes based on modes of actions (MoA) for their persistence rates among German axSpA outpatients. A retrospective analysis of the RHADAR database for axSpA patients with a new initiation of TNFi, IL-17i, or JAKi treatment between January 2015 and October 2023 was conducted. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox regressions for drug discontinuation. 1222 new biological DMARD (TNFi [n = 954], IL-17i [n = 190]) or JAKi (n = 78) treatments were reported. The median drug survival was 31 months for TNFi, 25 for IL-17i, and 18 for JAKi. The corresponding 2-year drug survival rate was 79.6%, 72.6%, and 62.8% for TNFi, IL-17i, and JAKi, respectively. The probability for discontinuation for JAKi was significantly higher compared with TNFi (HR 1.91 [95% CI 1.22–2.99]) as well as for IL-17i compared with TNFi (HR 1.43 [95% CI 1.02–2.01]), possibly related to more frequent use of TNFis as first-line therapy. IL-17i and JAKi discontinuation probabilities were similar. Primary non-response was the reason for drug discontinuation in most cases across all MoA. TNFi treatment might persist longer than JAKi and IL-17i in German axSpA outpatients, possibly related to more severe or refractory disease in patients with JAKi-treated or IL-17i-treated axSpA.

Impact of initiation of targeted therapy on the use of psoriatic arthritis-related treatments and healthcare consumption: a cohort study of 9793 patients from the French health insurance database (SNDS)

ObjectivesTo assess the potential impact of targeted therapies for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on symptomatic treatments (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, opioid analgesics), methotrexate and mood disorder treatments and on hospitalisation...

Real-world experience of bimekizumab for plaque psoriasis in adult patients with prior exposure to interleukin-17 inhibitors: A 16-week multicenter retrospective review

Real-world experience of bimekizumab for plaque psoriasis in adult patients with prior exposure to interleukin-17 inhibitors: A 16-week multicenter retrospective review

Real-World Adherence and Drug Survival of Biologics among Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world drug survival, adherence, and discontinuation risk of biologics disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods: This was a retrospective study using a computerized database. Biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced AS patients who initiated treatment with bDMARDs (tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors {TNF-αis} or interleukin-17 inhibitor {IL-17i}) during 2015-2018 were included. Adherence was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC) method. Drug survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Risk of discontinuation was estimated by the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: We identified 343 eligible patients utilizing 481 lines of therapy. The mean age was 44.6 years (SD ± 13.4), 57.7% were males, and 69.7% were biologic-naïve at baseline. The proportion of highly adherent patients (PDC ≥ 0.8) in the biologic-naïve group was 63.5% for golimumab, 69.2% for etanercept, and 71.6% for adalimumab (p > 0.9). Among the biologic-experienced group, secukinumab had the highest proportion of adherent patients (75.7%) and etanercept the lowest (50.0%) reaching statistical difference (p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a significant difference in drug survival in either the biologic-naïve or the biologic-experienced groups (p = 0.85). Multivariable analysis demonstrated a similar risk for discontinuation for etanercept, golimumab, and secukinumab compared with adalimumab, regardless of biologic-experience status. Conclusions: Adherence, drug survival, and risk for discontinuation were similar for all TNF-αis and the IL-17i SEC, regardless of biologic-experience status. As drug survival is an indirect measure of drug efficacy, n, in real-world settings, we believe caregivers can integrate these results into treatment considerations.