Interim Efficacy Analysis Research Articles

GenePHIT phase 2 study design: a double blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AB-1002 gene therapy in adults with heart failure

Abstract Introduction Heart failure (HF) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, highlighting a critical need for novel therapies. AB-1002, an engineered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector gene therapy candidate, delivers a constitutively active form of protein phosphatase inhibitor (I-1c) to restore cardiomyocyte intracellular calcium homeostasis. Preliminary results from an ongoing Phase (Ph) 1 trial (NCT04179643) of AB-1002 showed favourable safety and tolerability. Here we describe the design of AB-1002 Ph 2 trial (GenePHIT; NCT05598333) to evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Methods This phase 2 adaptive, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, multi-centre trial (currently United States; European sites planned) includes a 52-week observation and 4-year follow-up period. Eligible patients are ≥18 years of age with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and New York Health Association (NYHA) Class III heart failure symptoms (Figure). Patients will be randomised 1:1:1 (n=30–50/treatment arm), including a single dose of AB-1002 administered via antegrade intracoronary infusion at 1 of 2 different doses, or placebo, all in addition to standard of care. The primary endpoint will evaluate efficacy at 52 weeks based on the composite endpoint by modified win ratio, which includes cardiovascular-related death, change in NYHA classification, and for the responders, improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (≥5%), peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) ≥1.5 mL/kg/min, and 6-min walk test (6MWT) >30 metres. Key secondary efficacy endpoints include functional status and hospitalisations at 24 and 52 weeks, by assessing changes over time in NYHA classification, LVEF, pVO2, 6MWT, biomarkers (N-terminal pro-hormone b-type natriuretic peptide and troponin), quality of life questionnaires (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy), and physiological assessments. Key safety endpoints will be assessed through 52 weeks and include treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Exploratory endpoints will evaluate AAV2i8 antibody titres, T-cell response to AAV2i8 capsid and I-1c, and optional right ventricular biopsy testing. Long-term follow-up will assess treatment-emergent AEs and SAEs, and number of HF hospitalisations. Data safety monitoring board assessment will occur every 3 months. Primary efficacy endpoint will compare both active dose groups combined versus placebo using the joint rank test (1). Key secondary endpoints will be analysed using Analysis of Covariance with baseline as a continuous covariate. Multiple imputations will be used to address missing data. Interim efficacy analysis will be performed using a Bayesian adaptive sample size algorithm. Conclusions GenePHIT is currently recruiting and will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intracoronary infusion of AB-1002, an innovative gene therapy targeting ventricular dysfunction in HF.

Alternative Complement Pathway Inhibition with Iptacopan in IgA Nephropathy.

The alternative complement pathway plays a key role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Iptacopan specifically binds to factor B and inhibits the alternative pathway. In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled adults with biopsy-confirmed IgA nephropathy and proteinuria (defined as a 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio of ≥1 [with protein and creatinine both measured in grams]) despite optimized supportive therapy. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive oral iptacopan (200 mg) or placebo twice daily for 24 months while continuing to receive supportive therapy. The primary objective of this prespecified interim analysis was to assess the efficacy of iptacopan as compared with that of placebo in reducing proteinuria at month 9; the primary end point was the change from baseline in the 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio at month 9. The proportion of patients who had a 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio of less than 1 at month 9 without receiving rescue or alternative medication or undergoing kidney-replacement therapy (dialysis or transplantation) was a secondary end point. Safety was also assessed. The effect of iptacopan on kidney function will be assessed at the end of the 2-year double-blind treatment period. The main trial population included 222 patients in the iptacopan group and 221 in the placebo group. The interim efficacy analysis included the first 250 patients who underwent randomization in the main trial population (125 patients in each group) and who remained in the trial until month 9 or discontinued the trial by month 9. Safety was assessed in all the patients in the main trial population. At month 9, the adjusted geometric mean 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio was 38.3% (95% confidence interval, 26.0 to 48.6; two-sided P<0.001) lower with iptacopan than with placebo. The reduction in proteinuria was supported by consistent results in secondary end point analyses. There were no unexpected safety findings with iptacopan. The incidence of adverse events that occurred during the treatment period was similar in the two groups; most events were mild to moderate in severity and reversible. No increased risk of infection was observed. Among patients with IgA nephropathy, treatment with iptacopan resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful reduction in proteinuria as compared with placebo. (Funded by Novartis; APPLAUSE-IgAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04578834.).

Blinatumomab for MRD-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults

BackgroundMany older adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) have a relapse despite having a measurable residual disease (MRD)–negative complete remission with combination chemotherapy. The addition of blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager molecule that is approved for the treatment of relapsed, refractory, and MRD-positive BCP-ALL, may have efficacy in patients with MRD-negative remission.MethodsIn a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients 30 to 70 years of age with BCR::ABL1-negative BCP-ALL (with :: indicating fusion) who had MRD-negative remission (defined as <0.01% leukemic cells in bone marrow as assessed on flow cytometry) after induction and intensification chemotherapy to receive four cycles of blinatumomab in addition to four cycles of consolidation chemotherapy or to receive four cycles of consolidation chemotherapy alone. The primary end point was overall survival, and relapse-free survival was a secondary end point.ResultsThe data and safety monitoring committee reviewed the results from the third efficacy interim analysis and recommended that they be reported. Complete remission with or without full count recovery was observed in 395 of 488 enrolled patients (81%). Of the 224 patients with MRD-negative status, 112 were assigned to each group. The characteristics of the patients were balanced between the groups. At a median follow-up of 43 months, an advantage was observed in the blinatumomab group as compared with the chemotherapy-only group with regard to overall survival (at 3 years: 85% vs. 68%; hazard ratio for death, 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.73; P=0.002), and the 3-year relapse-free survival was 80% with blinatumomab and 64% with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.87). A higher incidence of neuropsychiatric events was reported in the blinatumomab group than in the chemotherapy-only group.ConclusionsThe addition of blinatumomab to consolidation chemotherapy in adult patients in MRD-negative remission from BCP-ALL significantly improved overall survival. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; E1910 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02003222.)

Effectiveness and Patient Experiences of Rhenium Skin Cancer Therapy for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: Interim Results from the EPIC-Skin Study.

Nonmelanoma skin cancer and its treatment represent a significant global cancer burden for health care systems and patients. Rhenium skin cancer therapy (Rhenium SCT) is a novel noninvasive radionuclide nonmelanoma skin cancer treatment, which can be provided in a single outpatient session. The aim of this prospective, multicenter, single-arm, international, phase IV study (EPIC-Skin) is to assess clinic- and patient-reported outcomes of Rhenium SCT as a treatment for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods: Eligible patients had biopsy-proven stage I or stage II BCC or SCC lesions no more than 3 mm deep and no larger than 8 cm2 in area. Rhenium SCT resin was applied to an adhesive foil affixed to the target lesion in a single session. Interim efficacy and safety analysis were planned once 50% of target patients had recorded a 6-mo follow-up visit. Primary outcome is the proportion of lesions achieving complete response using modified RECIST. Secondary and other outcome measures include patient-reported quality of life (QoL), treatment comfort, and cosmesis. Results: A total of 182 patients was enrolled and administered Rhenium SCT (50 Gy dose to deepest point of target) to at least 1 BCC or SCC. Of 81 patients who reached the 6-mo posttreatment follow-up, it was found that 97.2% (103/106) of lesions showed complete responses and 2.8% (3/106) had partial responses. Improvements in QoL were also reported, whereas no patients reported any pain or discomfort during treatment. Adverse events were reported in 15.9% (29/182) of patients and were rated grade 1 (n = 19), grade 2 (n = 9), or grade 3 (n = 1). Conclusion: This preliminary analysis of the EPIC-Skin study indicates that Rhenium SCT is safe and effective for the treatment of BCC and SCC and is associated with significant QoL improvements. It will be particularly beneficial for lesions that are difficult to treat surgically because of size and location. It is also beneficial for patients with comorbidities or those unable to receive conventional fractionated radiotherapy.

The impact of Paclitaxel-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients - interim analysis of safety and immediate efficacy of a randomized control trial (C-HOC trial)

ObjectiveThis study evaluates the potential superiority of combining paclitaxel-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with sequential intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy over intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC, IVA and IVB high-grade serous ovarian/fallopian tube carcinoma (HGSOC). This interim analysis focuses on the safety and immediate efficacy of both regimens to determine the feasibility of the planned trial (C-HOC Trial).MethodsIn a single-center, open-label, randomized control trial, FIGO stage IIIC, IVA, and IVB HGSOC patients (FAGOTTI score ≥ 8 during laparoscopic exploration) unsuitable for optimal cytoreduction in primary debulking surgery (PDS) were randomized 2:1 during laparoscopic exploration. The Experiment Group (HIPEC Group) received one cycle of intraperitoneal neoadjuvant laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (paclitaxel) followed by three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin), while the Control Group received only three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. Both groups subsequently underwent interval debulking surgery (IDS). The adverse effects of chemotherapy, postoperative complications, and pathological chemotherapy response scores (CRS) after IDS were compared.ResultsAmong 65 enrolled patients, 39 HIPEC Group and 21 Control Group patients underwent IDS. Grade 3–4 chemotherapy-related adverse effects were primarily hematological with no significant differences between the two groups. The HIPEC Group exhibited a higher proportion of CRS 3 (20.5% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.000). R0 resection rates in IDS were 69.2% (HIPEC Group) and 66.7% (Control Group). R2 resection occurred in 2.6% (HIPEC Group) and 14.3% (Control Group) cases. No reoperations or postoperative deaths were reported, and complications were managed conservatively.ConclusionsCombining HIPEC with IV NACT in treating ovarian cancer demonstrated safety and feasibility, with no increased chemotherapy-related adverse effects or postoperative complications. HIPEC improved tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, potentially enhancing progression-free survival (PFS). However, the final overall survival results are pending, determining if HIPEC combined with IV NACT is superior to IV NACT alone.

BEAT-meso: A randomized phase III study of bevacizumab (B) and standard chemotherapy (C) with or without atezolizumab (A), as first-line treatment (TX) for advanced pleural mesothelioma (PM)—Results from the ETOP 13-18 trial.

LBA8002 Background: The currently approved frontline TXs for PM are the combination of ipilimumab/nivolumab or platinum plus pemetrexed. The addition of B to C has been shown to improve overall survival in a randomized clinical trial. While combined immunotherapy or single agent immunotherapy with C is superior to C alone, there is potential for a synergistic triple combination of C, B, and immunotherapy. Methods: BEAT-meso (NCT03762018) is an international open-label, 1:1 randomized phase III trial, stratified by histology and stage. The objective is to determine the efficacy and safety of adding A (1200 mg, Q3W until progression) to B (15mg/kg, Q3W until progression) and standard C (4-6 cycles of carboplatin AUC5 with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, Q3W), as first-line TX for advanced PM. The trial is designed to detect an increase in the median overall survival (OS, primary endpoint) with the addition of A, aiming for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.708, at 2.5% 1-sided alpha and 82% power (284 deaths, sample size 400 patients (pts)). In the pre-specified interim efficacy analysis (80% of the events, 01/2023), boundary was not crossed, and the trial continued to completion. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, duration of response (DoR), adverse events (AEs) assessed by CTCAE v5.0 and symptom-specific and global quality of life (QoL). Results: Between 04/2019 and 03/2022, a total of 400 pts was randomized, 200 per arm. The median age was 70 years, 79% were male, 50% were former smokers, 65% had ECOG performance status 1 and 78% had epithelioid histology. At a median follow-up of 35 months (m) (as of 1/09/2023), median OS was 20.5m [95% CI: 17.5-23.3] in the ABC and 18.1m [15.7-20.9] in the BC arm (deaths: 145 &amp; 150; HRABC vs BC=0.84; [0.66 - 1.06], 2-sided stratified p=0.14, ITT final analysis). PFS was significantly longer in ABC with median 9.2m [8.1-10.9] vs 7.6m [6.9-8.3] in BC (HR=0.72; [0.59 - 0.89], 2-sided stratified p=0.0021). Histology shows a significant TX interaction for both PFS and OS. The OS HR is 0.51 [0.32-0.80] for non-epithelioid and 1.01 [0.77-1.32] for epithelioid (interaction p=0.012). In an exploratory analysis, post-progression OS was significantly different between the two arms, adjusted for post-progression TX (HR=0.76; [0.58 - 0.99]). The ORR was 55% in ABC and 49% in BC (p=0.27), while median DoR was 8.2m [6.8-9.7] in ABC and 5.6m [4.8-7.0] in BC (p=0.0041). Global QoL change was not significantly different between the two arms. Grade≥3 TX-related AEs occurred in 55% of pts in ABC and 47% of pts in BC (grade 5: 7 and 1 pt, respectively). Conclusions: The significant increase in median PFS with the addition of A did not translate into a significant increase in median OS. ABC demonstrated superiority over BC in non-epithelioid cases. Clinical trial information: NCT03762018 .

A phase 3 global study of telisotuzumab vedotin versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with c-Met 0verexpressing, EGFR wildtype, locally advanced/metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC (TeliMET NSCLC-01).

TPS8656 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) encompasses over two-thirds of lung cancer diagnoses, most presenting as advanced disease. c-Met (MET protein) is overexpressed in NSCLC. In this study, we investigate telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V), a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate composed of a c-Met–targeting antibody (telisotuzumab) and a microtubule polymerization inhibitor (cytotoxin monomethyl auristatin E). Interim efficacy analysis of the Phase 2 LUMINOSITY study (NCT03539536) of Teliso-V monotherapy showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 37% (95% CI: 24–51) in previously treated patients (pts) with c-Met overexpressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wildtype (WT) nonsquamous NSCLC and 52% (95% CI: 31–73) in the high c-Met overexpressing group (Camidge DR et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):9016). Methods: This randomized, open-label, global Phase 3 study (NCT04928846) evaluates the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of Teliso-V monotherapy compared with docetaxel in pts with locally advanced/metastatic c-Met overexpressing EGFR WT nonsquamous NSCLC who have progressed on prior therapy. Enrollment began in May 2022. To be eligible across global sites, pts must be ≥18 years old with c-Met overexpressing (ie, ≥25% tumor cells at 3+ intensity by IHC assay [anti-MET clone SP44; Roche Tissue Diagnostics]) locally advanced/metastatic EGFR WT NSCLC, with ECOG score ≤1. Pts must have progressed on at least one prior line of therapy, which can include no more than one line of prior chemotherapy, and must be naïve to c-Met–targeted antibodies and docetaxel. Target enrollment is 698 pts. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to Teliso-V (1.9 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and docetaxel (control, 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). Treatment continues until disease progression or discontinuation criteria are met. Co-primary endpoints are progression-free survival by independent central review and overall survival. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response, and patient-reported outcomes. Safety, adverse events (AEs), drug discontinuation or dosing modification due to AEs, and tolerability will be assessed. Previously presented at the 2023 ESMO Congress, Final Publication Number: 1501TiP, Antonio Lugini et al. - Reused with permission. Clinical trial information: NCT04928846 .

A phase 2 trial of IO102-IO103 and nivolumab-relatlimab fixed-dose combination in previously untreated, unresectable melanoma.

TPS9605 Background: One emerging strategy to augment immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy is to eliminate immunosuppressive cell populations in the tumor microenvironment (TME) through vaccination. IO102-IO103 is an investigational cancer vaccine that targets both tumor and immune-suppressive cells in the TME. IO102-IO103 treatment promotes inflammation and potentiates anti-tumor activity via activation and expansion of T cells against IDO1 and/or PD-L1 positive cells. IO102-IO103 plus nivolumab demonstrated an impressive objective response rate (ORR) of 80% in the phase 1/2 MM1636 trial of 30 patients with previously untreated, unresectable melanoma, and a randomized phase 3 trial of pembrolizumab with or without IO102-IO103 (NCT05155254) is ongoing. No prior studies have evaluated IO102-IO103 in combination with dual PD-1 and LAG-3 blockade with nivolumab-relatlimab (nivo-rela), and to our knowledge there are no existing clinical data for other investigational agents in combination with nivo-rela. Methods: NCT05912244 is a single-arm, investigator-initiated trial testing IO102-IO103 in combination with nivo-rela in patients with previously untreated, unresectable melanoma. Twelve of forty-three planned patients have been enrolled. All patients will be treated with nivo-rela every four weeks for up to two years. IO102-IO103 will be administered subcutaneously every two weeks for the initial eight weeks, and then every four weeks for up to two years. An interim efficacy analysis for futility will be performed after response data are available for 21 patients. Eligible patients must have histologically confirmed, unresectable stage III or stage IV non-uveal melanoma, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and definitive treatment of any brain metastases. Prior systemic treatment in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting is allowed if completed at least six months prior to trial enrollment. Available pre-treatment melanoma tissue is required, and all patients will undergo an on-treatment study biopsy between the second and third dose of nivo-rela. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be collected prior to the first three doses of nivo-rela. The primary endpoint is ORR by RECIST v1.1, weighted by PD-L1 expression. Secondary endpoints include safety assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0, progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1, duration of disease response, and disease control rate. Exploratory correlative endpoints include assessment of changes in PD-L1 and IDO-expressing cells in the TME on paired tumor biopsies, identification of peripheral PD-L1 and IDO-reactive cells in the peripheral blood by ELISpot, and assessment of peripheral pre-treatment and on-treatment T cell clonality by TCR sequencing. Clinical trial information: NCT05912244 .

Abstract GS01-03: Adding atezolizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III triple-negative breast cancer is unlikely to improve efficacy: interim analysis of the ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 phase 3 trial

Abstract Background: Early stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a high risk of distant relapse. ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 is a global, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial that investigated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profile of adjuvant atezolizumab plus standard anthracycline/taxane chemotherapy (arm A) versus chemotherapy alone (arm B) in early-stage TNBC. Methods: ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 (NCT03498716) aimed to randomize (1:1) 2300 patients with operable stage II-III TNBC, confirmed by central pathology review. Patients were stratified by type of surgery (breast conserving versus mastectomy), nodal status (0 versus 1-3 versus &amp;gt;=4 nodes), and centrally assessed PD-L1 status (IC 0 vs &amp;gt;=1% ). Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for 12 weeks followed by dose dense anthracycline (epirubicin 90 mg/m2 or doxorubicin 60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 for 4 doses every 2 weeks given concomitantly with atezolizumab 840 mg every 2 weeks followed by maintenance atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks until completion of 1 year of atezolizumab (Arm A) or the same chemotherapy regimen (T-EC/AC) alone (Arm B). The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS); secondary endpoints included, iDFS in the PD-L1 positive and lymph node-positive subpopulations, overall survival, safety, patient functioning and health related quality of life (HRQoL). On the 14th of November 2022, following an IDMC recommendation, the study accrual was temporarily stopped. In February 2023, the protocol was amended in order for the IDMC to perform an early interim analysis of efficacy and futility, at approximately 62% of the planned (390) iDFS events. The futility boundary was set to a Hazard Ratio (HR) &amp;gt; 1. Results: The IDMC recommendations of 15th March 2023 reported that the primary endpoint crossed the futility boundary, accrual to the study was permanently stopped and the experimental treatment was discontinued. Between August 2018 and November 2022, the study enrolled 2199 patients, with 1101 randomised to the atezolizumab arm (A) and 1098 to the control arm (B). At a median follow-up of 25.3 months, 239 (10.9%) iDFS events were observed in the 2199 enrolled patients; 127 versus 112 iDFS events were observed (61.3% of 390) in the A versus B arms respectively, HR 1.12, (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.87, 1.45). In the PD-L1 positive subgroup, (1567/2199 patients, 71.3%), 77 versus 73 iDFS events were observed in the A versus B arms respectively, HR 1.03, (95% CI 0.75, 1.42). Among patients with lymph node positive tumors (1066/2199 patients, 48.5%), 86 versus 66 iDFS events were observed in the A versus B arm respectively, HR 1.41, (95% CI 1.02, 1.96). Incidence of adverse events grade &amp;gt;=3 was 58.01% versus 48.15% in the A versus B arms, including death in 1.01% (11) and 0.55% (6) of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Crossing the pre-specified futility boundary of HR &amp;gt; 1 provides evidence that adjuvant atezolizumab is very unlikely to improve invasive disease-free survival when added to adjuvant anthracycline and taxane based chemotherapy in patients with stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer. With longer treatment exposure in the atezolizumab arm (A), adverse events were more frequent but consistent with the atezolizumab safety profile. No new or unexpected safety issue was identified. Citation Format: Michail Ignatiadis, Andrew Bailey, Heather McArthur, Sarra El-Abed, Evandro de Azambuja, Otto Metzger, Steve Chui, Max Dieterich, Thomas Perretti, Guenther Steger, Jacek Jassem, Soo Chin Lee, Michaela Higgins, José Zarbá, Marcus Schmidt, Henry Gomez, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Luca Moscetti, Joanne Win Yang Chiu, Carter DuFrane, Vanessa Honvault, Rosa Altarcheh, Luciana Molinero, Andrew Ellingson, Elisabetta Munzone, Noa Efrat Ben-Baruch, Emilio Bajetta, Shinji Ohno, Seock-Ah Im, Gustavo Werutsky, Einav Gal-Yam, Xavier Gonzalez-Farré, Ling-Ming Tseng, William Jacot, Oleg Gluz, Zhimin Shao, Yaroslav Shparyk, Ivan Sinielnikov, Zimina Anastasia, Aleksandr Vasiliev, Esther Shearer-Kang, Eric Winer, Diogo Martins-Branco, Shona Fielding, David Cameron, Giuseppe Viale, Shigehira Saji, Richard Gelber, Martine Piccart. Adding atezolizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III triple-negative breast cancer is unlikely to improve efficacy: interim analysis of the ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 phase 3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS01-03.

Abstract PO5-19-08: Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted Therapy +/- Immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab (neoHIP): An Open Label Randomized Phase II Trial

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is synergistic with HER2-directed therapy in pre-clinical models. Clinically, pembrolizumab (K)-mediated ICI plus HER2-directed therapy with trastuzumab (H) was safe and demonstrated modest activity in H-resistant HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. Because ICI may confer more robust activity when administered earlier in the course of disease, H and K administered in the curative-intent, treatment-naive setting may allow for de-escalation of cytotoxics; confer life-long, tumor-specific immunity; and ultimately, improve cure rates. Moreover, the synergy of H and K with paclitaxel (T) may overcome the need for dual HER2-blockade with H plus pertuzumab (P). In this randomized, multicenter, phase II, open-label trial the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant THP vs THP-K vs TH-K are explored. Methods: Patients (pts) ≥18y with previously untreated, stage II-III, HER2+ breast cancer are being randomized and stratified by clinical nodal status (positive vs. negative) and hormone receptor status (positive vs. negative). In arm A, pts receive T at 80mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks, H at 8mg/Kg (loading dose) and then 6mg/Kg every 3 weeks x 3 doses, P at 840 mg (loading dose) and then 420mg/Kg every 3 weeks x 3 doses (THP). In arm B, pts receive THP plus K at 200mg every 3 weeks x 4 doses (THP-K). In arm C, pts receive TH-K. After enrollment of 22 pts to arm C, a prespecified interim efficacy analysis was conducted, and enrollment to this arm was subsequently terminated. Enrollment to the other arms continues with 32/58 pts enrolled to arm A and 33/58 pts enrolled to arm B as of 2/14/2023. Definitive surgery is 3-6 weeks after the last dose. After surgery, pts are treated per the treating physician’s discretion per local clinical standard. The primary end point is pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the breast and axilla (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Secondary end points include pCR rate by ypT0ypN0 and ypT0/Tis, residual cancer burden index, event free survival, breast conserving surgery rate, safety and overall survival. Exploratory correlative studies will characterize potential immune biomarkers predictive of efficacy and/or toxicity. Funding sources: BCRF, Merck NCT03747120 Citation Format: Heather McArthur, Jorge Henrique Santos Leal, Isaac Chan, Nisha Unni, Stephen Shiao, Joshua Gruber, Samira Syed, Namrata Peswani, Navid Sadeghi, Glenda Delgado, Dawn Klemow, Reva Basho, Meredith Carter, Mai Badran, Nasir Qureshi, Jessica Curtin, Joshua Weese, Stephanie Rice, Michelle Phillips, David Chan, Hugo Hool, Dorothy Park, Mary El-Masry, Philomena McAndrew, Swati Sikaria, Laura Spring, Aditya Bardia, Mourad Tighiouart, Farnaz Dadmanesh, Armando Giuliano, Katherine Sanchez, David Page. Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted Therapy +/- Immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab (neoHIP): An Open Label Randomized Phase II Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-19-08.

Abstract CT279: DareonTM-5: An open-label phase 2 trial of BI 764532, a DLL3-targeting T-cell engager, in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer or other neuroendocrine carcinomas

Abstract Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung, and extrapulmonary NEC (epNEC) are difficult-to-treat, aggressive tumors with limited treatment options. Purpose: Many pts relapse and have poor outcomes after standard of care platinum-based chemotherapy ± immunotherapy, underscoring the need for better therapies. BI 764532, a humanized IgG-like T-cell engager, binds to delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) on the cell surface of these tumors and on CD3 on T cells, consequently promoting T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In an ongoing first-in-human trial, BI 764532 exhibited efficacy and manageable tolerability in pts with DLL3-positive SCLC, LCNEC of the lung, and epNEC (NCT04429087). We describe a planned phase 2 dose optimization trial to assess safety/efficacy of 2 different doses of BI 764532 monotherapy in pts with progressive/relapsed SCLC, epNEC, or LCNEC of the lung (NCT05882058). Experimental design: The trial will recruit adult pts (n=~120; ~70 sites; ~15 countries) with pathologically confirmed relapsed/refractory SCLC, epNEC, or LCNEC of the lung who have received ≥2 (SCLC) or ≥1 (epNEC/LCNEC) prior lines of therapy, including ≥1 platinum-based regimen. Pts with mixed tumor histology are permitted if the SCLC/NEC component is predominant (≥50% of tumor tissue). Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive 1 of 2 dose levels of IV BI 764532 (3-week cycles) stratified by tumor type (n=~60/arm). Treatment will continue until disease progression, undue toxicity, withdrawal of consent or any other documented criteria for stopping treatment (maximum treatment duration: 36 months). 2 interim dose-selection analyses are planned after 30 pts per dose have been followed for ≥6 and ≥12 weeks or have stopped treatment. A third interim efficacy analysis will be conducted when 60 pts per dose have been followed for ≥12 weeks or have stopped treatment. Key exclusion criteria: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2; untreated/symptomatic brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease; active/history of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis; previous DLL3-targeting treatment; treatment with other anticancer drugs &amp;lt;4 weeks prior to first administration of BI 764532; unresolved toxicity from prior treatment; immunodeficiency diagnosis; intake of immunosuppressive therapy ≤7 days prior to first administration of BI 764532. Primary endpoints: objective response via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1; occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints: duration of objective response, progression-free survival, disease control, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Further endpoints: pharmacokinetics, and prespecified and exploratory biomarker analysis. Citation Format: Valentina Gambardella, Alastair Greystoke, Martin Reck, Meiruo Liu, Martha Mueller, Ulrich Duenzinger, Emily B. Bergsland, Taofeek Owonikoko. DareonTM-5: An open-label phase 2 trial of BI 764532, a DLL3-targeting T-cell engager, in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer or other neuroendocrine carcinomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT279.

Abstract PR06: CD40 agonist mitazalimab in combination with mFOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): Interim efficacy results of the OPTIMIZE-1 phase 1b/2 study

Abstract Mitazalimab is a human CD40 agonistic IgG1antibody. Targeting CD40 kickstarts the cancer immunity cycle by licensing dendritic cells leading to tumor specific T cell priming and activation. Furthermore, in PDAC CD40 agonists on myeloid cells promote degradation of the desmoplastic tumor stroma, improving influx of T cells and sensitizing the tumor to chemotherapeutic agents. OPTIMIZE-1 (NCT04888312) is a Phase 1b/2, open label, multicenter study designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mitazalimab in combination with mFOLFIRINOX (Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, 5-FU 2.4 g/m2) in patients with previously untreated mPDAC. In the first part of the study (phase 1b), 900 µg/kg mitazalimab was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In the first 21-day treatment cycle, mitazalimab is administered IV at RP2D on day 1 and 10 and mFOLFIRINOX infusion started on day 8. In subsequent cycles, treatment follows a 14-day cycle where mitazalimab is administered 2 days after mFOLFIRINOX. The primary endpoint of this ongoing study is overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary and exploratory endpoints include duration of response, progression free and overall survival, safety, PK and PD biomarker assessments. As of May 24, 2023, study enrolment was complete, 65 patients were treated with mFOLFIRINOX and mitazalimab 900 µg/kg (RP2D). Interim efficacy analysis comprised of 57 evaluable patients. Median follow up was 6.5 months and median exposure to treatment was 5 months. 28 patients (49%) remain on treatment, 18 (32%) continued treatment beyond 6 months, the longest being 17 months (ongoing). ORR was 43.9% (25 patients with partial response), an additional 19 patients achieved stable disease, resulting in a 77.2% disease control rate. Median time to response was 2.2 months and median duration of response was 8.7 months. The most common grade (Gr) ≥3 TEAEs were neutropenia (21.5%), anemia (12.3%), thrombocytopenia (12.3%) and hypokalemia (12.3%). Mitazalimab related Gr &amp;gt;3 AEs occurring in more than one patient were fatigue in 3 (4.6%) patients, increased ALT in 3 (4.6%) patients, diarrhea in 2 (3.1%) patients, asthenia in 2 (3.1%) patients, increased AST in 2 (3.1%) patients, and hypokalemia in 2 (3.1%) patients. 25 patients (38.5%) experienced infusion reactions (all Gr 1-2, managed with symptomatic treatment, none amounting to cytokine release syndrome) and 7 (10.8%) patients discontinued treatment due to TEAEs (pneumonia, gastric obstruction, neuropathy, bacteremia, ileal obstruction, stroke, skin reaction). In this ongoing phase 1b/2 trial, 900 µg/kg mitazalimab has shown no evidence of additive toxicity when administered in combination with mFOLFIRINOX, allowing extended treatment until progression. Interim efficacy results demonstrate encouraging antitumor activity in mPDAC with good durability of responses, meriting continued development. Citation Format: Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Karen P. Geboes, Philippe A. Cassier, Ivan Borbath, Aurélien Lambert, Emmanuel Mitry, Hans Prenen, Jean-Frédéric Blanc, Lorenzo Pilla, Mercedes Rodriguez Garrote, Roberto A. Pazo Cid, Inmaculada Gallego, Jaime Feliú, Karin Nordbladh, Peter Ellmark, Malin Carlsson, Yago Pico de Coaña, Sumeet V. Ambarkhane, Teresa Macarulla. CD40 agonist mitazalimab in combination with mFOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): Interim efficacy results of the OPTIMIZE-1 phase 1b/2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Pancreatic Cancer; 2023 Sep 27-30; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(2 Suppl):Abstract nr PR06.

Abstract LB_A16: DareonTM-5: An open-label Phase II trial of BI 764532, a DLL3-targeting T cell engager, in patients with relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer or other neuroendocrine carcinomas

Abstract Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC), extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (epNECs) and large cell NECs (LCNECs) of the lung are difficult-to-treat, aggressive tumors with limited treatment (Tx) options. Standard of care for metastatic disease is platinum-based chemotherapy ± immunotherapy. However, nearly all patients (pts) relapse, and outcomes are poor. Hence, alternative therapies are needed. Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3), a Notch ligand, is highly expressed on the cell surface of SCLCs, epNECs and LCNECs. BI 764532, a humanized IgG-like T cell engager, binds to DLL3-positive tumor cells and CD3 on T-cells and promotes T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In an ongoing first-in-human trial, BI 764532 exhibited promising efficacy and manageable tolerability in pts with DLL3-positive SCLC, epNEC and LCNEC of the lung (NCT04429087). Here we describe a planned Phase II dose optimization trial to assess safety/efficacy of two different doses of BI 764532 monotherapy in pts with progressive/recurrent SCLC, epNEC or LCNEC of the lung (NCT05882058). Methods: The trial will recruit adult pts (n = ~120; ~70 sites; ~15 countries) with histologically/cytologically confirmed relapsed/refractory SCLC, epNEC or LCNEC of the lung who have received ≥2 (SCLC) or ≥1 (epNEC/LCNEC) prior lines of therapy, including ≥1 platinum-based regimen. Pts with mixed tumor histology are permitted if the SCLC/NEC component is predominant (≥50% of tumor tissue). Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive one of two dose levels of intravenous BI 764532 (3-week cycles) stratified by tumor type (n ~ 60/arm). Tx will continue until disease progression, undue toxicity, withdrawal of consent or any other documented criteria for stopping Tx (maximum Tx duration: 36 months). Interim analyses for dose selection are planned after 30 pts have been followed for ≥6 and ≥12 weeks or have stopped Tx. A third interim efficacy analysis will be conducted when 60 pts per dose have been followed for ≥12 weeks or have stopped Tx. Key exclusion criteria: ECOG PS ≥2; untreated/symptomatic brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease; active/previous history of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis; previous Tx with DLL3-targeting therapies; Tx with other anti-cancer drug &amp;lt;4 weeks prior to first administration of BI 764532; unresolved toxicity from prior anti-tumor Tx; diagnosis of immunodeficiency, or intake of immunosuppressive therapy ≤7 days prior to first administration of BI 764532. Primary endpoints: objective response (RECIST v1.1; investigator assessment); occurrence of Tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the on-Tx period. Secondary endpoints: duration of objective response; progression-free survival; disease control; overall survival; pt-reported outcomes; TEAEs leading to discontinuation during the on-Tx period. Further endpoints: pharmacokinetics (PK); prespecified and exploratory biomarker analysis (archival tumor tissue is required). The comparison of the two target doses in this trial will be based on the totality of data, including safety, efficacy, PK and biomarker data. Citation Format: Valentina Gambardella, Alastair Greystoke, Martin Reck, Meiruo Liu, Martha Mueller, Ulrich Duenzinger, Emily B Bergsland, Taofeek Owonikoko. DareonTM-5: An open-label Phase II trial of BI 764532, a DLL3-targeting T cell engager, in patients with relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer or other neuroendocrine carcinomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LB_A16.

Addition of danicopan to ravulizumab or eculizumab in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and clinically significant extravascular haemolysis (ALPHA): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial

Symptoms of anaemia due to clinically significant extravascular haemolysis can affect patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) treated with C5 inhibitors (ravulizumab or eculizumab). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of danicopan (ALXN2040), an investigational, first-in-class, oral complement factor D inhibitor, as add-on therapy to ravulizumab or eculizumab in patients with PNH and clinically significant extravascular haemolysis. ALPHA is an ongoing, international, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating danicopan as add-on therapy to ravulizumab or eculizumab. Eligible patients were adults (age ≥18 years) with PNH and clinically significant extravascular haemolysis (haemoglobin ≤9·5 g/dL; absolute reticulocyte count ≥120 × 109/L) on ravulizumab or eculizumab for at least 6 months. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to danicopan or placebo added to ravulizumab or eculizumab for 12 weeks using an interactive response technology system. Randomisation was stratified based on transfusion history, haemoglobin, and patients enrolled from Japan. The initial oral danicopan dose was 150 mg three times a day; escalation to 200 mg three times a day was permitted based on clinical response. The infusion dose level of eculizumab (every 2 weeks) ranged from 900 mg to 1500 mg, and for ravulizumab (monthly or every 8 weeks) ranged from 3000 mg to 3600 mg. The primary endpoint was change in haemoglobin concentration from baseline to week 12. Here we present the protocol-prespecified interim analysis, planned when approximately 75% of participants were randomly assigned to treatment and completed or discontinued at 12 weeks. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04469465). Individuals were randomly assigned between Dec 16, 2020, and Aug 29, 2022. At data cutoff (June 28, 2022), 73 individuals were randomly assigned, received treatment, and were analysed for safety (danicopan, n=49; placebo, n=24). The protocol-prespecified interim efficacy analysis set included the first 63 participants (danicopan, n=42; placebo, n=21). At week 12, danicopan plus ravulizumab or eculizumab increased haemoglobin versus placebo plus ravulizumab or eculizumab (least squares mean [LSM] change from baseline: danicopan, 2·94 g/dL [95% CI 2·52 to 3·36]; placebo, 0·50 g/dL [-0·13 to 1·12]; LSM difference, 2·44 g/dL [1·69 to 3·20]; p<0·0001). Grade 3 adverse events in the danicopan group were increased alanine aminotransferase (two [4%] of 49 patients), leukopenia (one [2%]), neutropenia (two [4%]), cholecystitis (one [2%]), COVID-19 (one [2%]), increased aspartate aminotransferase (one [2%]), and increased blood pressure (one [2%]), and in the placebo group were anaemia (one [4%] of 24 patients), thrombocytopenia (one [4%]), and asthenia (one [4%]). The serious adverse events reported in the danicopan group were cholecystitis (one [2%] patient) and COVID-19 (one [2%]) and in the placebo group were anaemia and abdominal pain, both in one (4%) patient. There were no serious adverse events related to study drug or deaths reported in the study. These primary efficacy and safety results show that danicopan as add-on treatment to ravulizumab or eculizumab significantly improved haemoglobin concentrations at week 12 with no new safety concerns, suggesting an improved benefit-risk profile in patients with PNH and clinically significant extravascular haemolysis. Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease.

A Single Arm Phase II Pilot Study of Low Dose Vemurafenib Plus Rituximab in the Front-Line and Relapsed/Refractory Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia

Introduction: Hairy Cell Leukemia (HCL) is a rare, low-grade B-cell malignancy that is characterized by cytopenias, infections and splenomegaly. Given the chronic and incurable nature of this disorder, limiting therapy-related toxicity is of paramount importance. Though purine nucleoside analogs have an established track record of durable efficacy, they are associated with significant myelosuppression and immunosuppression as well as late secondary malignancies. Mechanistic exploitation of aberrant BRAF V600E activation with vemurafenib in combination with CD20 targeting with rituximab has provided an effective means of eradicating leukemic cells without significant myelosuppression or immunosuppression. However, vemurafenib at the standard dose of 960 mg twice daily is often poorly tolerated and frequently requires dose reduction. We conducted a pilot study of rituximab and low-dose vemurafenib (240 mg twice daily) in patients with untreated or relapsed HCL, with a focus on providing a non-cytotoxic regimen that minimizes toxicity with potentially comparable treatment outcomes. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, single-arm, investigator-initiated pilot trial was designed, conducted, and managed at Scripps Clinic in La Jolla, California. We enrolled adult patients with HCL and mutated BRAF V600E who met standard treatment initiation criteria defined by an ANC ≤1.0, Hgb ≤ 10.0 or PLT ≤100K. The treatment plan consisted of eight weeks of oral vemurafenib 240 mg twice daily and eight intravenous rituximab infusions at 375 mg per square meter of body-surface area administered every two weeks. The primary outcome was complete hematologic response. Secondary endpoints included time to complete hematologic response, clearance of minimal residual disease determined by BRAF V600E allele frequency in the bone marrow, safety and progression-free, relapse-free and MRD-free survival. Results: From March 2022 to July 2023, a total of six patients were enrolled in the study. Three patients had previously received a purine analog and three patients were previously untreated. The median age of patients was 61 years, and all were male. At the interim efficacy analysis, all five (5/5) evaluable patients had demonstrated a complete hematologic response with resolution of cytopenias and splenomegaly. 6-month bone marrow biopsy data were available for 3 patients. In 2 of these patients, MRD assessment by allele-specific PCR for BRAF V600E was absent in the bone marrow. In the third patient, though residual disease was present by MRD assessment, he had a hematologic response and requires no subsequent treatment to date. At a median follow-up time of 303 days, the relapse-free survival rate was 100%. There were no adverse grade 3 or 4 adverse events and no vemurafenib dose limiting toxicity was observed. Conclusions: Interim results to-date suggest that rituximab and low-dose vemurafenib (240 mg twice daily) have efficacy and good tolerability in patients with untreated or relapsed HCL. With accruing patient data and further enrollment on study, more information will guide the durability, efficacy and tolerability of this treatment approach.

Early Complete Responses with Mosunetuzumab Monotherapy in Treatment-Naïve Follicular and Marginal Zone Lymphomas with Only Low-Grade Cytokine Release Syndrome

Introduction Mosunetuzumab (mosun) is a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody that has been FDA-approved for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma after two prior lines of therapy. Updated follow up of the pivotal study in relapsed/refractory patents (Sehn et al ICML 2023, median follow up 28.3 months) showed a CR rate of 60%. Among the patients in CR, 77% remained alive and progression free at 2 years. We hypothesized that mosun would be even more active in patients (pts) without prior lymphotoxic therapy. Therefore, we designed a response adapted study for pts with untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Methods This is a single center, open label, investigator-initiated response-adapted clinical trial in untreated pts with FL or MZL with indication for treatment. Pts received subcutaneous mosunetuzumab monotherapy for 8 cycles (21 day cycle, Part A) employing step up dosing in cycle 1 (5 mg, 45 mg, 45 mg). Dexamethasone prophylaxis was administered through C2D1, and could be omitted after that for patients without CRS in the previous cycle. A PET/CT was performed after 8 cycles, and pts in CR were observed without further treatment. Pts with SD or PR could receive 6 cycles (21 day cycle, Part B) of polatuzumab vedotin and obinutuzumab, followed by an end of treatment (EOT) PET/CT. Total planned accrual is 42 pts. The primary endpoint is complete response (CR) rate. A pre-planned interim efficacy analysis is being reported after 20 enrolled pts. If 14 or fewer of the first 20 subjects do not achieve an objective response, the study will be suspended to enrollment. Additional planned safety analyses are in place with suspension rules to detect excessive G4 non-heme toxicity and G2+ CRS. Results 26 pts enrolled on study between March 24, 2022, and March 11, 2023, with 26 pts evaluable for safety, and 21 pts are evaluable for efficacy. Median age was 64 (42-83), including 16 (62%) age 60+. Histologies enrolled include G1-2 follicular lymphoma (19, 73%), G3A follicular lymphoma (4, 15%), and marginal zone lymphoma (3, 12%). The most common indication for treatment was symptomatic disease (19, 73%). All treatment was delivered as an outpatient. Three pts experienced a serious adverse event (one pt with G3 lung infection followed by G3 shingles, one pt observed overnight with G1 cytokine release syndrome, and one pt with a G2 URI). Other G3 non-lab AEs observed were diarrhea (1, 4%), syncope (1, 4%), and hypertension (1, 4%). Sixteen (62%) pts experienced G1 CRS, with no G2 or higher CRS observed or any grade ICANS observed. No pts required tocilizumab. All CRS events first occurred during cycle 1. Headache was common but low grade (G1 14, 54%, G2 1, 4%). Heme toxicity &amp;gt; G1 was uncommon, with G4 neutropenia (1, 4%), and G2+ thrombocytopenia (2, 8%). No G4 non-heme toxicity was observed. Nearly all pts (92%) experienced at least one injection site reaction, which were all G1 except a single pt with a G2 reaction. Seven (26%) pts experienced a treatment delay due to toxicity, primarily due to infection in 4 pts. Only one patient did not receive all doses of mosun - G3 ALT increase and prolonged G1 CRS led to discontinuation after cycle 1 (patient achieved CR). Twenty-one patients are efficacy evaluable, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 100%. Eighteen patients have completed mosun therapy, with an ORR and CR rate of 100% and 83%, respectively. Three patients proceeded to obinutuzumab and polatuzumab combination therapy, of whom two have completed all treatment (both converted to CR). All pts remain alive and progression-free. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion Fixed duration mosun monotherapy achieves a high CR rate in untreated pts with follicular and marginal zone lymphoma with no G2+ CRS and no ICANS of any grade. Injection site reactions and headaches were common but reversible. Safety and efficacy has remained well within study suspension thresholds and accrual is ongoing to a goal of 42 total patients.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Acalabrutinib in Combination with Rituximab and Reduced Dose CHOP (R-miniCHOP) in Older Adults with Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (ARCHED / GLA 2022-1)

Background Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma subtype, and its incidence increases with age. Approximately 40% of patients with DLBCL are older than 70 years. Since the addition of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab to CHOP regime (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) prognosis in elderly patients has improved but still remains worse compared to their younger counterparts. Adequate dosage of chemotherapy in older adults is limited by comorbidities/frailty, especially in patients &amp;gt;80 years of age. An attenuated chemotherapy regimen, R-miniCHOP, has been evaluated in prospective trials and seems to provide a good balance between safety and efficacy in this vulnerable patient population (Peyrade et al, 2011). However, even with this regime, outcomes remain modest with 2-year overall survival at 50-60%, underlining the need for more effective treatment in this population. Acalabrutinib is a selective, irreversible, second-generation small molecule inhibitor of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) with a more favorable safety profile compared to first generation BTK inhibitors. Although, not yet approved for the treatment of DLBCL, acalabrutinib showed promising results both as a single agent (Strati et al, Haematologica 2021) and in combination with full dose R-CHOP (Davies et al, ASH 2022), in patients aged up to 80 years. Furthermore, acalabrutinib carries the potential of improved efficacy in specific subgroups. The activated B-cell like (ABC) DLBCL subtype has been shown to depend on chronic active B-cell receptor signaling involving many downstream kinases including BTK. Additionally, the genetically defined subgroups MCD/C5, N1, and BN2/C1 and also may serve as potential predictive biomarkers for acalabrutinib. Study design and endpoints ARCHED is an investigator initiated, randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of R-miniCHOP with or without acalabrutinib in older adults with untreated DLBCL. Patients in the standard arm will receive 6 cycles of R-miniCHOP every 21 days followed by 2 cycles of rituximab alone, while patients in the experimental arm will receive the same regimen and additionally acalabrutinib 100 mg p.o. twice daily from day 1 to day 21 for 8 cycles (Figure 1). The primary endpoint of the study is investigator assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, PFS per blinded independent review, event-free survival, outcomes according to cell of origin and molecular genotype, response rates, duration of response, progression, relapse and central nervous system (CNS) relapse rates as well as toxicity. Key eligibility criteria Patients are eligible for enrolment if they are &amp;gt;80 years old or &amp;gt;60 years old and ineligible for full-dose R-CHOP according to investigator assessment after standardized simplified geriatric evaluation and are diagnosed with untreated CD20+ DLBCL according to the 2017 WHO classification. Primary mediastinal lymphoma, high grade B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma 3B as well as concurrent diagnosis of indolent lymphoma is allowed, but Richter's transformation is an exclusion criterion. Ann Arbor stage I patients can be included only in the presence of concomitant bulky disease (≥ 7.5 cm). Further exclusion criteria are CNS involvement, stroke or intracranial hemorrhage in the past 6 months and relevant organ dysfunction. An ECOG performance status score of 0 - 2 is required for enrolment but an ECOG score of 3 is acceptable if lymphoma associated. Statistical analysis With an expected 5% drop out rate, we aim to recruit 330 patients (165 in each arm) to achieve 80 % power at a 5 % significance level (two-sided) to observe a PFS difference of 15 % in favor of the experimental arm. An interim analysis for efficacy comparing PFS between the two treatment arms will be performed with n=200 patients and 1 year follow-up for the last patient, with approximately 50% of events. Additionally, an interim analysis for safety regarding treatment completion rates and all-cause mortality will take place when 92nd patient in each group has completed the sixth R-mini-CHOP cycle or died. ARCHED is an academic study of the German Lymphoma Alliance and is coordinated by the Saarland University Clinical Trials Unit. This study is funded by AstraZeneca GmbH. The trial is approved in the EU and is open for recruitment in Germany. (EU-CTN: 2022-501187-18-00, NCT05820841).

First-Line Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab in RET Fusion–Positive NSCLC

BackgroundSelpercatinib, a highly selective potent and brain-penetrant RET inhibitor, was shown to have efficacy in patients with advanced RET fusion–positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a nonrandomized phase 1–2 study.MethodsIn a randomized phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line selpercatinib as compared with control treatment that consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab at the investigator’s discretion. The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in both the intention-to-treat–pembrolizumab population (i.e., patients whose physicians had planned to treat them with pembrolizumab in the event that they were assigned to the control group) and the overall intention-to-treat population. Crossover from the control group to the selpercatinib group was allowed if disease progression as assessed by blinded independent central review occurred during receipt of control treatment.ResultsIn total, 212 patients underwent randomization in the intention-to-treat–pembrolizumab population. At the time of the preplanned interim efficacy analysis, median progression-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9 to not estimable) with selpercatinib and 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 16.8) with control treatment (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.70; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 84% (95% CI, 76 to 90) with selpercatinib and 65% (95% CI, 54 to 75) with control treatment. The cause-specific hazard ratio for the time to progression affecting the central nervous system was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68). Efficacy results in the overall intention-to-treat population (261 patients) were similar to those in the intention-to-treat–pembrolizumab population. The adverse events that occurred with selpercatinib and control treatment were consistent with those previously reported.ConclusionsTreatment with selpercatinib led to significantly longer progression-free survival than platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab among patients with advanced RET fusion–positive NSCLC. (Funded by Eli Lilly and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04194944.)

Phase 3 Trial of Selpercatinib in Advanced RET-Mutant Medullary Thyroid Cancer

BackgroundSelpercatinib, a highly selective, potent RET inhibitor, has shown efficacy in advanced RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer in a phase 1–2 trial, but its efficacy as compared with approved multikinase inhibitors is unclear.MethodsWe conducted a phase 3, randomized trial comparing selpercatinib as first-line therapy with the physician’s choice of cabozantinib or vandetanib (control group). Eligible patients had progressive disease documented within 14 months before enrollment. The primary end point in the protocol-specified interim efficacy analysis was progression-free survival, assessed by blinded independent central review. Crossover to selpercatinib was permitted among patients in the control group after disease progression. Treatment failure–free survival, assessed by blinded independent central review, was a secondary, alpha-controlled end point that was to be tested only if progression-free survival was significant. Among the other secondary end points were overall response and safety.ResultsA total of 291 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 12 months, median progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review was not reached in the selpercatinib group and was 16.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2 to 25.1) in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.48; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 12 months was 86.8% (95% CI, 79.8 to 91.6) in the selpercatinib group and 65.7% (95% CI, 51.9 to 76.4) in the control group. Median treatment failure–free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review was not reached in the selpercatinib group and was 13.9 months in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression, discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events, or death, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.42; P<0.001). Treatment failure–free survival at 12 months was 86.2% (95% CI, 79.1 to 91.0) in the selpercatinib group and 62.1% (95% CI, 48.9 to 72.8) in the control group. The overall response was 69.4% (95% CI, 62.4 to 75.8) in the selpercatinib group and 38.8% (95% CI, 29.1 to 49.2) in the control group. Adverse events led to a dose reduction in 38.9% of the patients in the selpercatinib group, as compared with 77.3% in the control group, and to treatment discontinuation in 4.7% and 26.8%, respectively.ConclusionsSelpercatinib treatment resulted in superior progression-free survival and treatment failure–free survival as compared with cabozantinib or vandetanib in patients with RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer. (Funded by Loxo Oncology, a subsidiary of Eli Lilly; LIBRETTO-531 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04211337.)

1999P IMreal Cohort 4: Third interim analysis of efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) receiving atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (atezo + CE) as first-line (1L) therapy under real-world conditions (RWCs)

1999P IMreal Cohort 4: Third interim analysis of efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) receiving atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (atezo + CE) as first-line (1L) therapy under real-world conditions (RWCs)