•Progress in the implementation of the Integrated Survey System in New South Wales up to the present is reviewed briefly. Specific examples to show up the effects of using the selected prOJection are given in order to clarify them. The need for great care in framing the regulations which will accompany the proposed Act is emphasized. Most of the papers on survey integration which have been published in The Australian Surveyor recently have had the specific aim of explaining the system and presenting its benefits to the profession. The surveyor is now accustomed to the idea of working in such a system and in New South Wales a lot of progress has been made on the path toward integration. It is hoped that legislation introducing a Survey Integration Act will be passed in the present sitting of the State Parliament; and draft regulations for this Act are now being considered by a sub committee of the Institution. As a direct consequence of the funds, which the Commonwealth has released to the States, manpower has been employed in rural areas placing Permanent Marks and these await coordination. Details of the projection have been decided (see reference 1) and shortly projection tables will be printed by the Government Printer. A technical manual is being prepared, and the Lands Department has acquired a computer, which will help with the processing and recording of survey data. A series of courses, designed to explain the proposed system in both its theory and application, has been run by the School of Surveying at the University of New South Wales. It seems that the stage is set for a successful transition to the integration system. It is now a good time to pause, in order to appraise the progress that has been made so far, and particularly to study the impact that it has had on the thinking of the surveying community. The writer was involved in the recent courses mentioned above and found the comments made by those attending interesting. Nearly 200 people have now been to the courses, and these men must be considered representative of the profession at large, such is the diversity of their background and experience. Why integration at all? There are a few people who, despite the many arguments that have been presented in favour of integration, still oppose it in principle (or on principle). Some of these agree with the idea of working in a
Read full abstract