Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Resistance Research Articles

HIV-1 subtype-specific drug resistance on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: protocol for a multicentre study (DTG RESIST)

IntroductionHIV drug resistance poses a challenge to the United Nation’s goal of ending the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) dolutegravir, which has a higher resistance barrier, was...

HIV Drug Resistance in Newly Diagnosed Young Children in the Western Cape, South Africa.

Pretreatment of HIV drug resistance among children living with HIV (CLHIV) can compromise antiretroviral therapy (ART) effectiveness. Resistance may be transmitted directly from mothers or acquired following exposure to antiretrovirals consumed through breastfeeding or administered as prophylaxis. We performed resistance testing in children aged <3 years, newly diagnosed with HIV in Western Cape, South Africa (2021-2022), who either (1) acquired HIV via possible breastfeeding transmission from mothers who received ART (any regimen) during pregnancy/postpartum and/or (2) were exposed to protease inhibitors or integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in utero. Possible breastfeeding transmission was defined as testing HIV-polymerase chain reaction positive at age >28 days, after previously testing negative. We used surveillance drug-resistance mutation lists to define mutations. We included 135 CLHIV. Most mothers started ART prepregnancy (73%). Overall, 57% (77/135) of children had resistance mutations detected. Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-associated, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-associated, protease inhibitor-associated and INSTI-associated mutations were found in 55% (74/135), 10% (13/135), <1% (1/135) and <1% (1/122) of children tested, respectively. One child with breastfeeding transmission had high-level INSTI resistance detected at HIV diagnosis, aged 18 months (E138K and G118R mutations). Although not clinically relevant, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-associated mutations were common. Dolutegravir is currently the preferred first-line treatment for adults and CLHIV age ≥4 weeks, and although very low INSTI resistance levels have been observed in adults, limited data exist on genotyping the integrase region in children. Pretreatment INSTI resistance in children is likely to be unusual, but future surveillance, including longitudinal studies with paired mother-child resistance testing, is needed.

HIV-1 subtype-specific drug resistance on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: protocol for a multicentre longitudinal study (DTG RESIST).

HIV drug resistance poses a challenge to the United Nation's goal of ending the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) dolutegravir, which has a higher resistance barrier, was endorsed by the World Health Organization in 2019 for first-, second-, and third-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). This multiplicity of roles of dolutegravir in ART may facilitate the emergence of dolutegravir resistance. DTG RESIST is a multicentre longitudinal study of adults and adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and South and Central America who experienced virologic failure on dolutegravir-based ART. At the time of virologic failure whole blood will be collected and processed to prepare plasma or dried blood spots. Laboratories in Durban, Mexico City and Bangkok will perform genotyping. Analyses will focus on (i) individuals who experienced virologic failure on dolutegravir, and (ii) on those who started or switched to such a regimen and were at risk of virologic failure. For population (i), the outcome will be any InSTI drug resistance mutations, and for population (ii) virologic failure defined as a viral load >1000 copies/mL. Phenotypic testing will focus on non-B subtype viruses with major InSTI resistance mutations. Bayesian evolutionary models will explore and predict treatment failure genotypes. The study will have intermediate statistical power to detect differences in resistance mutation prevalence between major HIV-1 subtypes; ample power to identify risk factors for virologic failure and limited power for analysing factors associated with individual InSTI drug resistance mutations. The research protocol was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Bern, Switzerland. All sites participate in IeDEA and have obtained ethics approval from their local ethics committee to conduct the additional data collection. NCT06285110. - DTG RESIST is a large international study to prospectively examine emergent dolutegravir resistance in diverse settings characterised by different HIV-1 subtypes, provision of ART, and guidelines on resistance testing. - Embedded within the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA), DTG RESIST will benefit from harmonized clinical data across participating sites and expertise in clinical, epidemiological, biological, and computational fields. - Procedures for sequencing and assembling genomes from different HIV-1 strains will be developed at the heart of the HIV epidemic, by the KwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform (KRISP), in Durban, South Africa. Phenotypic testing, Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) methods and Bayesian evolutionary models will explore and predict treatment failure genotypes. - A significant limitation is the absence of genotypic resistance data from participants before they started dolutegravir treatment, as collecting and bio-banking pre-treatment samples was not feasible at most IeDEA sites. Consistent and harmonized data on adherence to treatment are also lacking. - The distribution of HIV-1 subtypes across different sites is uncertain, which may limit the statistical power of the study in analysing patterns and risk factors for dolutegravir resistance. The results from GWAS and Bayesian modelling analyses will be preliminary and hypothesis-generating.

Real-world prevalence of integrase inhibitor resistance and virological failure since adoption as guideline-preferred therapy.

Limited data reporting real-world prevalence of integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance (INSTI-R) in the USA are available because their recommendation as first-line treatment in 2017. Reported national surveillance data in the USA estimated INSTI-R to be 6.3% as of 2018. This article aims to describe estimated prevalence of INSTI-R within a single clinic network in Chicago, IL, USA, and identify risk factors for resistance and virological failure (VF). This was a retrospective, single-centre study of adults with HIV starting an INSTI-containing regimen between September 2017 and 2020. The primary endpoint was the difference in INSTI-R of the sample population compared with the national prevalence. Other outcomes included VF and documented INSTI-R mutations. Of 948 participants screened, 321 were included. Eight people had baseline INSTI-R testing results available, of which five had INSTI-R at baseline for an estimated prevalence of 1.6%. This estimation was significantly less than the national estimated prevalence of 6.3% (p<0.001). VF occurred in 26 (7.8%) individuals. Because no participants acquired INSTI-R during the study period, investigators were unable to identify risk factors associated with the development of INSTI-R. People with high pre-treatment viral loads had 1.21 (95% CI 1.05-1.39) higher odds of VF. Amongst participants on INSTI-containing regimens, INSTI-R rates were estimated to be lower than the estimated national prevalence. Detectable pre-switch viral loads were more associated with VF than undetectable viral loads.

Clinical, molecular, and drug resistance epidemiology of HIV in Jordan, 2019-2021: A national study

BackgroundLimited epidemiologic studies have been conducted in Jordan describing the HIV epidemic. This study aimed to address this gap to inform HIV prevention and control. MethodsA nationally-representative cross-sectional study was conducted among adults living with HIV in Jordan. Laboratory testing included HIV viral load and next-generation-sequencing-based clinical genotype. Log-binomial regression estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsAmong 231 (70%) participants, most were male (184/80%), and from Jordan (217/94%). Among 188 treatment-experienced-participants (>6 months), 165 (88%) were virally suppressed. High-level resistance was most frequent against nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (13/81%), and integrase-strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) (10/62%) drugs among viremic (≥1000 HIV copies/mL) treatment-experienced participants with drug-resistant mutations (DRMs, n = 16). Common HIV subtypes (n = 43) were B (6/14%), A1 (5/12%), and CRF01_AE (5/12%); additionally, novel recombinant forms were detected. In multivariate analysis, independently higher risk for late diagnosis (n = 49) was observed with diagnosis through blood donation (vs check-up: RR 2.20, 95%CI 1.16-4.17) and earlier time-period of diagnosis (1986-2014 vs 2015-2021: RR 2.87, 95%CI 1.46-5.62). ConclusionsLate diagnosis and INSTI resistance endanger national HIV prevention and treatment in Jordan—high-level resistance to INSTI suggests therapeutic drug monitoring is needed for treatment efficacy and conservation of treatment options.

HIV transmission dynamics and population-wide drug resistance in rural South Africa

Despite expanded antiretroviral therapy (ART) in South Africa, HIV-1 transmission persists. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) and long-acting injectables offer potential for superior viral suppression, but pre-existing drug resistance could threaten their effectiveness. In a community-based study in rural KwaZulu-Natal, prior to widespread INSTI usage, we enroled 18,025 individuals to characterise HIV-1 drug resistance and transmission networks to inform public health strategies. HIV testing and reflex viral load quantification were performed, with deep sequencing (20% variant threshold) used to detect resistance mutations. Phylogenetic and geospatial analyses characterised transmission clusters. One-third of participants were HIV-positive, with 21.7% having detectable viral loads; 62.1% of those with detectable viral loads were ART-naïve. Resistance to older reverse transcriptase (RT)-targeting drugs was found, but INSTI resistance remained low (<1%). Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance, particularly to rilpivirine (RPV) even in ART-naïve individuals, was concerning. Twenty percent of sequenced individuals belonged to transmission clusters, with geographic analysis highlighting higher clustering in peripheral and rural areas. Our findings suggest promise for INSTI-based strategies in this setting but underscore the need for RPV resistance screening before implementing long-acting cabotegravir (CAB) + RPV. The significant clustering emphasises the importance of geographically targeted interventions to effectively curb HIV-1 transmission.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance mediated by R263K plus E157Q in a patient with HIV infection treated with bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine: case report and review of the literature.

The in vivo selection of E157Q plus R263K has not been reported in patients treated with coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF). To the best of our knowledge, we hereby report the first case of high-grade INSTI resistance associated with the presence of these aminoacidic substitutions in a treatment-experienced HIV patient treated with BIC/FTC/TAF. Clinical case report and review of the literature. A heavily treatment-experienced patient was switched to BIC/FTC/TAF due to drug-drug interactions after being diagnosed with disseminated Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare disease. He had been treated before with raltegravir with poor adherence. No mutations in the integrase gene were detected 1 year after finishing treatment with raltegravir. Months after being switched to BIC/FTC/TAF, and again with poor adherence documented, virological failure (VF) was detected. The polymorphic substitution E157Q and the resistance mutation R263K in the integrase gene were detected, as well as M184V, among other mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene. The patient is currently being treated with dolutegravir q12h plus boosted darunavir along with directly observed treatment, and for the first time in 20 years, plasmatic viral load values are below 100 copies/mL. This case illustrates that the combination of E157Q and R263K plus M184V can be selected in vivo in a clinical scenario of poor adherence with BIC/FTC/TAF, although it is a very rare phenomenon. Previous VF with first-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) should be kept in mind when switching patients to second-generation INSTIs.

Epistatic pathways can drive HIV-1 escape from integrase strand transfer inhibitors.

People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) have been reported to experience virological failure in the absence of resistance mutations in integrase. To elucidate INSTI resistance mechanisms, we propagated HIV-1 in the presence of escalating concentrations of the INSTI dolutegravir. HIV-1 became resistant to dolutegravir by sequentially acquiring mutations in the envelope glycoprotein (Env) and the nucleocapsid protein. The selected Env mutations enhance the ability of the virus to spread via cell-cell transfer, thereby increasing the multiplicity of infection (MOI). While the selected Env mutations confer broad resistance to multiple classes of antiretrovirals, the fold resistance is ~2 logs higher for INSTIs than for other classes of drugs. We demonstrate that INSTIs are more readily overwhelmed by high MOI than other classes of antiretrovirals. Our findings advance the understanding of how HIV-1 can evolve resistance to antiretrovirals, including the potent INSTIs, in the absence of drug-target gene mutations.

Portable Nanopore sequencing solution for next-generation HIV drug resistance testing

BackgroundTackling HIV drug resistance is one of major challenges for ending AIDS epidemic, but the elevated expense of cutting-edge genomics hampers the advancement of HIV genotype testing for clinical care. MethodsWe developed a HIV genotype testing pipeline that centers on a cost-efficient portable Nanopore sequencer. Accuracy verification was conducted through comparison with parallel data obtained via fixed-site Pacbio sequencing. Our complete pol-gene sequencing strategy coupled with portable high-throughput sequencing was applied to identify drug resistance mutations across 58 samples sourced from the ART-treated Los Angeles General Medical Center Rand Schrader Clinic (LARSC) cohort (7 samples from 7 individuals) and the ART-naïve Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology (CHAVI) cohort (51 samples from 38 individuals). ResultsA total of 472 HIV consensus sequences, each tagged with a unique molecular identifier, were produced from over 1.4 million bases acquired through portable Nanopore sequencing, which matched those obtained independently via Pacbio sequencing. With this desirable accuracy, we first documented the linkage of multidrug cross-resistance mutations across Integrase Strand Transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) and Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs) from an individual failing a second-generation INSTI regimen. By producing more than 500 full-length HIV pol gene sequences in a single portable sequencing run, we detected Protease Inhibitor (PI), Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NRTI), NNRTI and INSTI resistance mutations. All drug resistance mutations identified through portable sequencing were cross-validated using fixed-site Pacbio sequencing. ConclusionsOur accurate and affordable HIV drug resistance testing solution is adaptable for both individual patient care and large-scale surveillance initiatives.

Transmitted drug resistance to antiretroviral drugs in Spain during the period 2019-2021.

To evaluate the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR)to nucleoside and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI,NNRTI),protease inhibitors (PI),and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI)in Spain during the period 2019-2021, as well as to evaluate transmitted clinically relevant resistance (TCRR)to antiretroviral drugs. Reverse transcriptase (RT),protease (Pro), and Integrase (IN)sequences from 1824 PLWH (people living with HIV) were studied. To evaluate TDR we investigated the prevalence of surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRM).To evaluate TCRR (any resistance level ≥ 3), and for HIV subtyping we used the Stanford v.9.4.1 HIVDB Algorithm and an in-depth phylogenetic analysis. The prevalence of NRTI SDRMs was 3.8% (95% CI,2.8%-4.6%), 6.1% (95% CI,5.0%-7.3%) for NNRTI, 0.9% (95% CI,0.5%-1.4%) for PI, and 0.2% (95% CI,0.0%-0.9%) for INSTI. The prevalence of TCRR to NRTI was 2.1% (95% CI,1.5%-2.9%), 11.8% for NNRTI, (95% CI,10.3%-13.5%), 0.2% (95% CI,0.1%-0.6%) for PI, and 2.5% (95% CI,1.5%-4.1%) for INSTI. Most of the patients were infected by subtype B (79.8%), while the majority of non-Bs were CRF02_AG (n = 109, 6%). The prevalence of INSTI and PI resistance in Spain during the period 2019-2021 is low, while NRTI resistance is moderate, and NNRTI resistance is the highest. Our results support the use of integrase inhibitors as first-line treatment in Spain. Our findings highlight the importance of ongoing surveillance of TDR to antiretroviral drugs in PLWHparticularly with regard to first-line antiretroviral therapy.

Mutation patterns of integrase gene affect antiretroviral resistance in various non-B subtypes of human immunodeficiency virus Type-1 and their implications for patients' therapy.

Although primary integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance mutations are currently uncommon, the increasing use of integrase strand transfer inhibitor as a key component of the first, second and third-line antiretroviral regimens suggests that the prevalence of integrase drug resistance mutations will likely increase. The rise of several polymorphic mutations and natural polymorphisms also affects the level of susceptibility of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type-1 to integrase strand transfer inhibitor. The considerable variability among the various subtypes of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 may contribute to differences in integrase mutations associated with integrase strand transfer inhibitors. Notably, non-B subtypes of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) are the predominant cause of human immunodeficiency virus infection worldwide. The presence of diverse integrase drug resistance mutations can have significant implications on the administration of integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy to patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

High viral suppression and detection of dolutegravir-resistance associated mutations in treatment-experienced Tanzanian adults living with HIV-1 in Dar es Salaam

To curb HIV infection rate in Tanzania, antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been scaled up since 2006, and in 2019, the country shifted to regimen including dolutegravir as a default first line. We assessed the success of ART and the contribution of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) to unsuppressed viral loads. Between February and May 2023 a cross-sectional survey with random sampling was conducted in the six clinics in an urban cohort in Dar es Salaam. Patients with unsuppresed viral loads (local criteria viral load (VL) ≥ 1000 copies/mL) were tested for HIVDR mutations using the WHO adapted protocol for plasma samples. Mutations were interpreted using the Stanford HIVDR database. In total 600 individuals participated in this survey, the majority were female (76.83%), mean age (pm standard deviation) was 44.0 (pm 11.6) years. The median duration on ART (interquartile range) was 6.5 (3.9–10.2) years. Approximately 99% were receiving tenofovir + lamivudine + dolutegravir as a fixed dose combination. VL testing was successful in 99.67% (598/600) of survey patients and only 33 had VL ≥ 1000 copies/mL, resulting in a viral suppression level of 94.48% (565/598, 95% CI 92.34–96.17%). For 23 samples, protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) genotyping were successful, with 13 sequences containing RT inhibitor surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) (56.5%). No SDRM against protease inhibitors were detected. Thirty samples were successfully genotyped for integrase with 3 sequences (10.08%) containing integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) SDRMs. In samples successfully genotyped in the three genetic regions, 68.18% (16/22) had a genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) ≥ 2.5 for the concurrent regimen, implying factors beyond drug resistance caused the unsuppressed viral load. For five patients, GSS indicated that HIVDR may have caused the unsuppressed viral load. All three patients with INSTI resistance mutations were highly resistant to dolutegravir and accumulated nucleoside and non-nucleoside RT inhibitor HIVDR mutations. Although in this cohort the last 95 UNAIDS target was almost achieved, HIVDR mutations, including INSTIs resistance mutations were detected in HIV-positive individuals taking ART for at least one year. We recommend the design and implementation of high-impact interventions to prevent the increase of HIVDR, failure of dolutegravir and address the non-resistance factors in the study area.

Efficacy and safety of long-acting cabotegravir compared with daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine to prevent HIV infection in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men 1 year after study unblinding: a secondary analysis of the phase 2b and 3 HPTN 083 randomised controlled trial

Injectable cabotegravir was superior to daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine for HIV prevention in two clinical trials. Both trials had the primary aim of establishing the HIV prevention efficacy of long-acting injectable cabotegravir pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine daily oral PrEP. Long-acting PrEP was associated with diagnostic delays and integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance. This report presents findings from the first unblinded year of the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 083 study. The HPTN 083 randomised controlled trial enrolled HIV-uninfected cisgender men and transgender women at elevated HIV risk who have sex with men, from 43 clinical research sites in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the USA. Inclusion criteria included: a negative HIV serological test at the screening and study entry, undetectable HIV RNA levels within 14 days of study entry, age 18 years or older, overall good health as determined by clinical and laboratory evaluations, and a creatinine clearance of 60 mL/min or higher. Participants were randomly allocated to receive long-acting injectable cabotegravir or daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine PrEP. After study unblinding, participants remained on their original regimen awaiting an extension study. HIV infections were characterised retrospectively at a central laboratory. Here we report the secondary analysis of efficacy and safety for the first unblinded year. The primary outcome was incident HIV infection. Efficacy analyses were done on the modified intention-to-treat population using a Cox regression model. Adverse events were compared across treatment groups and time periods (blinded vs unblinded). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02720094. Of the 4488 participants who contributed person-time to the blinded analysis, 3290 contributed person-time to the first unblinded year analysis between May 15, 2020, and May 14, 2021. Updated HIV incidence in the blinded phase was 0·41 per 100 person-years for long-acting injectable cabotegravir PrEP and 1·29 per 100 person-years for daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine PrEP (hazard ratio [HR] 0·31 [95% CI 0·17-0·58], p=0·0003). HIV incidence in the first unblinded year was 0·82 per 100 person-years for long-acting PrEP and 2·27 per 100 person-years for daily oral PrEP (HR 0·35 [0·18-0·69], p=0·002). Adherence to both study products decreased after study unblinding. Additional infections in the long-acting PrEP group included two with on-time injections; three with one or more delayed injections; two detected with long-acting PrEP reinitiation; and 11 more than 6 months after their last injection. Infection within 6 months of cabotegravir exposure was associated with diagnostic delays and INSTI resistance. Adverse events were generally consistent with previous reports; incident hypertension in the long-acting PrEP group requires further investigation. Long-acting injectable cabotegravir PrEP retained high efficacy for HIV prevention in men and transgender women who have sex with men during the first year of open-label follow-up, with a near-identical HR for HIV risk reduction between long-acting injectable cabotegravir and daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine PrEP during the first year after unblinding compared with the blinded period. Extended follow-up further defined the risk period for diagnostic delays and emergence of INSTI resistance. Division of AIDS at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences.

Prevalence and analysis of acquired and transmitted integrase strand transfer inhibitor-associated HIV-1 drug resistance in Chongqing, China

ABSTRACT In this study, we examined the occurrence of acquired and transmitted drug resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) in HIV-1 strains in Chongqing (China) for guiding for the routine testing of INSTI-associated HIV-1 genotype resistance. Plasma samples were obtained from HIV-1 patients at Chongqing Public Health Medical Center from July 2019 to August 2022. Besides, amplification, sequence, and analysis of the portion of the HIV-1 pol gene that encodes the integrase protein were implemented to identify INSTI resistance. Integrase sequence data was harvested for a comprehensive cohort of 1032 patients infected with HIV-1. This cohort consisted of 564 ART-naive patients, 465 ART-treated patients, and 3 patients with an unknown treatment history. Within the study group, we identified INSTI resistance in 21 patients (2.03%, 21/1032), including 17 ART-treated patients (3.66%, 17/465). Among the ART-treated patients, 12 were INSTI-treated (11.76%, 12/102), 5 were INSTI-naive (1.38%, 5/363), and 4 were ART-ineffective patients (0.71%, 4/564). The prevalent major resistance mutation was Q148R (0.48%, 5/1032), while the most prevalent accessory resistance mutation was E157Q (1.65%, 17/1032). In light of the above, it is recommended that the incidence of accessory genotype analysis should be considered before starting any future INSTI-based therapy, especially in patients with drug resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs and the reduction of INSTI sensitivity should be carefully monitored and investigated. Regular monitoring for resistance should be implemented after the use of INSTIs, and, importantly, ongoing monitoring of the decreasing susceptibility to INSTIs is crucial following the initiation of treatment with INSTIs.

Pretreatment integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance in Tianjin, China.

Pretreatment integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance in Tianjin, China.

A National HIV Provider Survey of Antiretroviral Therapy Preferences for Management of Treatment-Naive and Experienced Individuals With Drug Resistance.

HIV clinical practice guidelines outline broad treatment principles but offer less explicit recommendations by permutations of encountered viral resistance. We hypothesize that there is variability in antiretroviral (ARV) regimen decision making among providers when considering HIV drug resistance (HIVDR). US HIV providers provided ARV regimen recommendations for case vignettes in a series of electronic surveys encompassing variations of HIVDR. Responses were characterized by drugs and classes selected and anticipated activity based on genotypic susceptibility. Heterogeneity was defined as the proportion of unique ARV regimens from total responses. An overall 119 providers from the United States participated. Among case vignettes with isolated M184V and viremia, 85.9% selected a regimen with 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) + integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI); 9.9% selected regimens with >3 ARVs. Alternatively, in scenarios of viremia with moderate to high-level NRTI resistance, >50% of providers selected an NRTI-sparing regimen, while a minority recommended 2 NRTIs + INSTI (21/123, 17%). In moderate to high-level INSTI resistance, there was response heterogeneity, with no common unifying approach to management (127 unique regimens/181 responses, 70% heterogeneity). Providers used cabotegravir/rilpivirine for treatment simplification in suppressed cases, despite a history of treatment failure (37/205, 36%). Our national survey of US HIV providers revealed a consensus to management of HIV resistance with potential alternative options in cases with low heterogeneity. Providers selected cabotegravir/rilpivirine as a viable treatment simplification strategy in suppressed cases with a history of treatment failure. The responses to the case vignettes could be used an education tool for ARV decision making in HIVDR.

HIV-1 drug resistance in people on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative cohort analysis

The widespread use of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir in first-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) might facilitate emerging resistance. The DTG RESIST study combined data from HIV cohorts to examine patterns of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and identify risk factors for dolutegravir resistance. We included cohorts with INSTI resistance data from two collaborations (ART Cohort Collaboration, International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS in Southern Africa), and the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort. Eight cohorts from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Switzerland, South Africa, and the UK contributed data on individuals who were viraemic on dolutegravir-based ART and underwent genotypic resistance testing. Individuals with unknown dolutegravir initiation date were excluded. Resistance levels were categorised using the Stanford algorithm. We identified risk factors for resistance using mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression models. We included 599 people with genotypic resistance testing on dolutegravir-based ART between May 22, 2013, and Dec 20, 2021. Most had HIV-1 subtype B (n=351, 59%), a third had been exposed to first-generation INSTIs (n=193, 32%), 70 (12%) were on dolutegravir dual therapy, and 18 (3%) were on dolutegravir monotherapy. INSTI DRMs were detected in 86 (14%) individuals; 20 (3%) had more than one mutation. Most (n=563, 94%) were susceptible to dolutegravir, seven (1%) had potential low, six (1%) low, 17 (3%) intermediate, and six (1%) high-level dolutegravir resistance. The risk of dolutegravir resistance was higher on dolutegravir monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 34·1, 95% CI 9·93-117) and dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual therapy (aOR 9·21, 2·20-38·6) compared with combination ART, and in the presence of potential low or low (aOR 5·23, 1·32-20·7) or intermediate or high-level (aOR 13·4, 4·55-39·7) nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance. Among people with viraemia on dolutegravir-based ART, INSTI DRMs and dolutegravir resistance were rare. NRTI resistance substantially increased the risk of dolutegravir resistance, which is of concern, notably in resource-limited settings. Monitoring is important to prevent resistance at the individual and population level and ensure the long-term sustainability of ART. US National Institutes of Health, Swiss National Science Foundation.

Evaluation of integrase resistance in individuals who failed a regimen containing dolutegravir in French and Italian clinical settings.

This work aims to evaluate integrase resistance and its predictors in HIV-1 infected combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) experienced individuals failing a dolutegravir-based regimen. Major resistance mutations (MRM) and genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) of dolutegravir companion drugs were evaluated on plasma genotypic resistance test (GRT) performed at dolutegravir failure. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated to the risk of integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTI)-resistance at dolutegravir failure. We retrospectively analysed 467 individuals. At failure GRT, individuals had been under dolutegravir for a median (IQR) time of 11 (5-20) months; around half of them had never been exposed to INSTI (52%) and 10.7% were at first-line regimen. Fifty-eight (12.4%) individuals showed ≥1 INSTI MRM. Among them, people INSTI-exposed showed significantly higher prevalence of INSTI resistance compared to those who were INSTI naïve [46 (21.2%) versus 9 (3.9%), P < 0.001].N155H was the most prevalent MRM (5.4%), followed by G140S (4.5%) and Q148H (4.3%). These MRM were more probably present in INSTI-experienced individuals compared to those INSTI naïve. Despite failure, 89.5% of individuals harboured viral strains fully susceptible to dolutegravir and bictegravir and 85.0% to all INSTI. No INSTI exposure before receiving dolutegravir [OR: 0.35 (0.16-0.78), P < 0.010] and a GSS for companion drugs ≥2 (OR: 0.09 [0.04-0.23], P < 0.001) were negatively associated with INSTI resistance at failure. In a large set of individuals failing dolutegravir in real-life, INSTI resistance was low and mainly related to previous first-generation INSTI exposure. Surveillance of integrase resistance remains crucial to preserve efficacy of INSTI class in the future.

Low level of HIV-1C integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance mutations among recently diagnosed ART-naive Ethiopians

With the widespread use of Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), surveillance of HIV-1 pretreatment drug resistance is critical in optimizing antiretroviral treatment efficacy. However, despite the introduction of these drugs, data concerning their resistance mutations (RMs) is still limited in Ethiopia. Thus, this study aimed to assess INSTI RMs and polymorphisms at the gene locus coding for Integrase (IN) among viral isolates from ART-naive HIV-1 infected Ethiopian population. This was a cross-sectional study involving isolation of HIV-1 from plasma of 49 newly diagnosed drug-naive HIV-1 infected individuals in Addis-Ababa during the period between June to December 2018. The IN region covering the first 263 codons of blood samples was amplified and sequenced using an in-house assay. INSTIs RMs were examined using calibrated population resistance tool version 8.0 from Stanford HIV drug resistance database while both REGA version 3 online HIV-1 subtyping tool and the jumping profile Hidden Markov Model from GOBICS were used to examine HIV-1 genetic diversity. Among the 49 study participants, 1 (1/49; 2%) harbored a major INSTIs RM (R263K). In addition, blood specimens from 14 (14/49; 28.5%) patients had accessory mutations. Among these, the M50I accessory mutation was observed in a highest frequency (13/49; 28.3%) followed by L74I (1/49; 2%), S119R (1/49; 2%), and S230N (1/49; 2%). Concerning HIV-1 subtype distribution, all the entire study subjects were detected to harbor HIV-1C strain as per the IN gene analysis. This study showed that the level of primary HIV-1 drug resistance to INSTIs is still low in Ethiopia reflecting the cumulative natural occurrence of these mutations in the absence of selective drug pressure and supports the use of INSTIs in the country. However, continues monitoring of drug resistance should be enhanced since the virus potentially develop resistance to this drug classes as time goes by.

Increasing trend of transmitted integrase inhibitor resistance in a cohort of antiretroviral therapy-naive people living with HIV.

Drug regimens containing integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are widely recommended by international guidelines for ART-naive people living with HIV (PLWH).1,2 However, INSTI resistance mutations are uncommon and therefore their surveillance is not suggested before starting ART. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence trend of transmitted INSTI drug resistance (DR) and to assess factors associated with transmitted INSTI resistance among ART-naive PLWH over the past decade. We conducted a time-trend, single-centre study over the period 2009–19 on adult naive PLWH with a genotypic resistance test (GRT) performed before the ART initiation. GRT was determined by Sanger sequencing using an ABI PRISM 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA); we included in the analysis the immediate pre-ART GRT available in people newly diagnosed with HIV infection. The degree of resistance to each INSTI drug was calculated using the Genotypic Resistance Interpretation Algorithm of the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database Program (version 9.1.1) (https://hivdb.stanford.edu/hivdb/by-patterns/). The obtained scores were used to classify the presence of low-level, intermediate or high-level resistance to each INSTI drug and to the INSTI drug class. DR within the INSTI class was defined by the presence of at least low-level resistance to ≥1 drug of the INSTI class.