Intake Appointment Research Articles

61 The HEADS-ED under 6: Validation of a mental health and developmental screening and triage tool

Abstract Background The HEADS-ED screening and triage tool was developed for children 6 years to young adults as a communimetric mental health (MH) and addictions screener to help clinicians identify and communicate areas of need and recommended clinical care. Few clinician-administered tools identify both MH and developmental needs in young children under 6. From a review of milestone tools and in consultation with paediatricians, psychiatrists, and family physicians, the HEADS-ED Under 6 is a MH and developmental screening and triage tool that was developed to screen and flag functional impairment and action required in several areas, including: Home & caregivers, Eating & sleeping, Activities & peers, Development /speech/language/motor, Safety, Emotions & behaviours and Discharge & current resources (see http://heads-ed.com for more background and access to both tools available in English and French). Objectives Our objectives were to examine: 1) feasibility of implementing the new HEADS-ED Under 6 screening and triage tool in community and hospital settings, 2) clinical utility of the tool to assist with clinical decision making, and 3) validity of the tool against a comprehensive assessment. Design/Methods We conducted two implementation and validation studies to examine uptake of the tool and how the tool assists in clinical referral decisions to more specialized and intensive services at 2 sites. For our initial validation study, we piloted and validated the tool at a community MH agency in Ontario for children under the age of 6 from November 2019- March 2021 (N=566). For our cross-validation study, we examined how the tool was implemented within a regional coordinated access service housed in a paediatric hospital in Ontario from June 2021- August 2023 (N=589). Results For our initial validation study, the HEADS-ED Under 6 was widely used by intake workers (95%, N = 536/566) to communicate children’s MH and developmental needs (Figure 1) and assisted in recommending services of varying intensity. The tool showed good concordance with the InterRAI Early Years assessment in similar domains requiring no action (61.1% to 81.6%), requiring action but not immediate (49.2% to 88.0%) and requiring immediate action (66.7% to 100%) for children under 4 years old (p's <.001). Three clinical domains (Eating & sleeping, Development/speech/language/motor, and Emotions & behaviours) also independently predicted an urgent care recommendation (p's < .001). For our cross-validation study, the tool was used for all 589 intake appointments, and 96.4% (N = 568/589) had a level of need documented. HEADS-ED Under 6 clinical domains (.24-.38) and total scores (.52) were significantly correlated with level of need (p<.001). Higher HEADS-ED Under 6 total scores helped intake workers decide on more intense services based on level of need (p<.001; Figure 2). ROC analyses (AUC = .807, SE = 68.5% sensitivity, 79.5% specificity) confirmed a total score of 6 or above helped triage to more targeted and intense services. Conclusion The HEADS-ED Under 6 is a brief, straight-forward, and valid screening and triage tool that can be used by intake workers, physicians, and paediatricians to guide their interview in several areas of MH and development, communicate the severity of the child’s MH and developmental needs, and assist with determining level of need for services. When a HEADS-ED Under 6 total score reaches ≥6, clinicians should advocate for more intensive services when making MH service referrals.

Brief Report on Outpatient Treatment of Adolescent Opioid Use Disorder.

Adolescents are experiencing an increase in substance-related overdose fatalities, with most attributed to fentanyl and an increase in the prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD). We know little about the characteristics of adolescents who use fentanyl, develop OUD, and seek addiction treatment. Here, we present demographic data and retention data on adolescent patients (≤18 years) who were treated at a pediatric addiction clinic. We included all patients who presented to an intake appointment at the pediatric addiction clinic between January 3, 2023, and October 17, 2023, and were diagnosed with OUD. We collected data on demographics, decision to start medicine for OUD (MOUD), choice of MOUD, and retention in treatment based on clinic visits at 1 month and 3 months postintake. Patients are consisted of 24 adolescents (Mage at intake = 16.8 ± 1.0 years, 67% Hispanic/Latinx, 75% public insurance) who met the criteria for moderate to severe OUD with known fentanyl use. All were offered MOUD, and 21 patients agreed to MOUD treatment; 16 adolescents selected buprenorphine/naloxone, and 5 selected naltrexone. At 3 months postintake, 14 patients (58%) were retained in treatment. Adolescent and family acceptance of MOUD treatment was high, and most patients were retained in treatment at 3 months postintake. More studies are needed to understand how to retain and support adolescent patients in outpatient treatment for OUD given the emergence of fentanyl.

Impact of a Comprehensive Financial Navigation Intervention to Reduce Cancer-Related Financial Toxicity.

Although the need to reduce the impact of financial toxicity among patients with cancer is widely acknowledged, few interventions have been developed to address this issue. We tested a novel, multiphase, patient-centered financial navigation (FN) intervention at a large academic medical center. We developed a financial toxicity screening tool consisting of the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) measure plus several additional items based on patient feedback. After systematizing the screening process, 50 patients from the North Carolina Basnight Cancer Hospital were enrolled in the FN intervention following a positive screen for financial distress (COST score <23). The FN intervention involved one-on-one consultations with a trained financial navigator and included an initial comprehensive intake appointment to determine patient eligibility for financial assistance and follow-up appointments to discuss paperwork and application(s) status. We assessed preliminary intervention effectiveness (preintervention and postintervention COST scores) and implementation (ie, fidelity, uptake, acceptability). All 50 patients assessed for study eligibility screened positive for financial distress. A total of 46 patients completed both the preintervention and postintervention COST instrument and other measures. Postintervention mean COST scores improved from 6.4 at baseline to 13.3 post-FN (P<.0001), indicating a significant decrease in perceived financial toxicity. Fidelity to the intervention was high and 96% of participants received financial assistance. A patient-centered FN intervention fully integrated into an existing care coordination model can help to decrease the burden of cancer-related financial toxicity among patients with cancer experiencing financial distress. Further studies are needed to test FN interventions in various oncology settings and among targeted populations.

Child mental health treatment access and retention in integrated primary care and traditional outpatient services.

There are disparities in child mental health treatment access and treatment retention in terms of race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance coverage. Institutions have invested in the integrated primary care (IPC) treatment model with the goal of improving treatment access and promoting child mental health equity. This study compared treatment attendance in an outpatient psychiatry clinic (OPC) versus an IPC clinic to assess whether the IPC was associated with reduced disparities in access to care and treatment retention. This study assessed whether there were differences in who is connected to care from the intake appointment to first follow-up appointment. Results showed that the IPC clinic served a more diverse patient population than the OPC clinic in terms of SES, race, and ethnicity. Differences in treatment attendance in the IPC and OPC were also found. After controlling for race, ethnicity, insurance, and distance from patient's home zip code to clinic, the IPC treatment setting was associated with poorer intake and follow-up appointment attendance. The IPC model may be more accessible to historically underserved youth, but the treatment setting does not inherently eliminate disparities in child mental health treatment retention. Replication of this study has the potential to contribute to the external validity of study findings, improve quality assurance policies, and develop equitable workflow policies. Future research is needed to identify factors that can improve treatment attendance for populations who face greater retention barriers and to shine light on ways that healthcare systems may inadvertently maintain disparity in treatment retention.

Validation of a Multivariable Model to Predict Suicide Attempt in a Mental Health Intake Sample

Given that suicide rates have been increasing over the past decade and the demand for mental health care is at an all-time high, targeted prevention efforts are needed to identify individuals seeking to initiate mental health outpatient services who are at high risk for suicide. Suicide prediction models have been developed using outpatient mental health encounters, but their performance among intake appointments has not been directly examined. To assess the performance of a predictive model of suicide attempts among individuals seeking to initiate an episode of outpatient mental health care. This prognostic study tested the performance of a previously developed machine learning model designed to predict suicide attempts within 90 days of any mental health outpatient visit. All mental health intake appointments scheduled between January 1, 2012, and April 1, 2022, at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large integrated health care delivery system serving over 4.5 million patients, were included. Data were extracted and analyzed from August 9, 2022, to July 31, 2023. Suicide attempts (including completed suicides) within 90 days of the appointment, determined by diagnostic codes and government databases. All predictors were extracted from electronic health records. The study included 1 623 232 scheduled appointments from 835 616 unique patients. There were 2800 scheduled appointments (0.17%) followed by a suicide attempt within 90 days. The mean (SD) age across appointments was 39.7 (15.8) years, and most appointments were for women (1 103 184 [68.0%]). The model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.76-0.78), an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.02 (95% CI, 0.02-0.02), an expected calibration error of 0.0012 (95% CI, 0.0011-0.0013), and sensitivities of 37.2% (95% CI, 35.5%-38.9%) and 18.8% (95% CI, 17.3%-20.2%) at specificities of 95% and 99%, respectively. The 10% of appointments at the highest risk level accounted for 48.8% (95% CI, 47.0%-50.6%) of the appointments followed by a suicide attempt. In this prognostic study involving mental health intakes, a previously developed machine learning model of suicide attempts showed good overall classification performance. Implementation research is needed to determine appropriate thresholds and interventions for applying the model in an intake setting to target high-risk cases in a manner that is acceptable to patients and clinicians.

Transgender and non-binary patient simulations can foster cultural sensitivity and knowledge among internal medicine residents: a pilot study

Transgender and nonbinary patients face unique healthcare challenges, such as harassment, discrimination, and/or prejudice, at higher rates than their cisgender counterparts. These experiences, or even the fear of these experiences, may push patients to delay or forego medical treatment, thus compounding any existing conditions. Such extraneous issues can be combatted through cultural sensitivity. The authors designed blended education consisting of an online module followed by a live simulation to educate and promote sensitivity. Internal medicine (IM) residents (n = 94) completed the module, which introduced them to transgender community terminology and medical disparities, and ways to incorporate affirming behaviors into their practice. Afterward, they engaged in a simulation with true transgender-simulated patients (SPs) — either trans-masculine, trans-feminine, or non-binary. Residents were expected to conduct a patient interview mirroring an intake appointment. Residents then engaged in a debriefing session with the lead investigator and the SP to reflect on the experience, receive feedback and constructive criticism, and ask questions. After the education, the residents’ knowledge significantly increased, t(66) = 3.69, p ≤ 0.00, d = 0.45, and their attitude toward members of the transgender community also increased significantly, t(62) = 7.57, p ≤ 0.00, d = 0.95. Furthermore, nearly all residents (99%) reported the training allowed them to practice relevant skills and was a worthy investment of their time. Nearly half (45%) of the residents who listed changes they will make to their practice pledged to ask patients for their preferred name and pronouns. Most comments were positive (75%), praising the education’s effectiveness, expressing gratitude, and reporting increased confidence. Results provided evidence that the education was effective in increasing IM residents’ knowledge and attitudes. Further research is needed to investigate the longitudinal effects of this education and to extend the education to a broader audience. The investigators plan to adapt and expand the research to other specialties such as gynecology and emergency medicine.

Healthcare providers’ perspectives on implementing a brief physical activity and diet intervention within a primary care smoking cessation program: a qualitative study

BackgroundPost-smoking-cessation weight gain can be a major barrier to quitting smoking; however, adding behavior change interventions for physical activity (PA) and diet may adversely affect smoking cessation outcomes. The “Picking up the PACE (Promoting and Accelerating Change through Empowerment)” study assessed change in PA, fruit/vegetable consumption, and smoking cessation by providing a clinical decision support system for healthcare providers to utilize at the intake appointment, and found no significant change in PA, fruits/vegetable consumption, or smoking cessation. The objective of this qualitative study was to explore the factors affecting the implementation of the intervention and contextualize the quantitative results.MethodsTwenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare providers, using questions based on the National Implementation Research Network’s Hexagon Tool. The data were analyzed using the framework’s standard analysis approach.ResultsMost healthcare providers reported a need to address PA and fruit/vegetable consumption in patients trying to quit smoking, and several acknowledged that the intervention was a good fit since exercise and diet could improve smoking cessation outcomes. However, many healthcare providers mentioned the need to explain the fit to the patients. Social determinants of health (e.g., low income, food insecurity) were brought up as barriers to the implementation of the intervention by a majority of healthcare providers. Most healthcare providers recognized training as a facilitator to the implementation, but time was mentioned as a barrier by many of healthcare providers. Majority of healthcare providers mentioned allied health professionals (e.g., dieticians, physiotherapists) supported the implementation of the PACE intervention. However, most healthcare providers reported a need for individualized approach and adaptation of the intervention based on the patients’ needs when implementing the intervention. The COVID-19 pandemic was found to impact the implementation of the PACE intervention based on the Hexagon Tool indicators.ConclusionThere appears to be a need to utilize a flexible approach when addressing PA and fruit/vegetable consumption within a smoking cessation program, based on the context of clinic, the patients’ it is serving, and their life circumstances. Healthcare providers need support and external resources to implement this particular intervention.Name of the registryClinicaltrials.gov.Trial registration numberNCT04223336.Date of registration7 January 2020 Retrospectively registered.URL of trial registry recordhttps://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04223336.

(RE-)AIMing for Rapid Uptake: Pilot Evaluation of a Modified Hub and Spoke Model of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.

Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is an effective, evidence-based treatment, but significant gaps in implementation remain. We evaluate one novel approach to address this gap: a Hub and Spoke model to increase buprenorphine access and management. This outcome evaluation was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework using secondary data analysis of clinical and administrative data to characterize program outcomes for program Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, and Maintenance. Implementation was assessed through a chart review of provider progress notes and through key informant interviews with program staff to understand why this site was able to introduce a novel approach to MOUD. Nearly half of patients with opioid use disorder (45.48%, n=156) were reached by the program over 2 years. Of those, 91.67% had 1 or more program visits after an initial intake appointment, and 78.85% had a buprenorphine prescription. Patients in the program were 2.44 times more likely to have a buprenorphine prescription than those in comparator site that did not have a Hub and Spoke program (95% CI: 1.77-3.37; P <0.001). There was significantly greater program reach in year 1 than year 2, suggesting rapid initial uptake followed by modest program growth. Key informant interviews illustrated several themes regrading program implementation, including the importance of process champions, the beneficial impact of MOUD for patients, and addressing facility performance metrics. A supportive organizational culture and a receptive climate were also key factors for implementation. This program led to rapid improvement in MOUD uptake across the facility. Future efforts should focus on improving program maintenance, including supporting the exchange of patients from the hub to appropriate spokes.

Relationship Between Self-care and Physician-Patient Relations in Patients with Heart Failure

: This study aimed to determine the relationship between self-care and physician-patient relations in patients with Heart Failure (HF). This cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 patients with HF, referring to the outpatient clinics affiliated with Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Utilizing a systematic random sampling method, the patients were selected from those who had made intake appointments. The Physician-Patient Relationship Questionnaire and the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior scale (EHFScB scale) were used to collect the data. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficient, logistic regression, Student’s t-test, and one-way ANOVA in SPSS (ver. 25). The total score of the self-care behaviors in the patients referring to the outpatient clinics was moderate (31.88 ± 8.66). Also, significant relationships were observed between the scores of self-care behaviors and physician’s gender, patient’s marital status, patient’s education, and between physician-patient relations scores and physician gender (P-value &lt; 0.05). Moreover, physician-patient relations and marital status could predict the patient’s self-care variable by 22% (R2 = 0.221, F = 5.35). The study results revealed that physician-patient relations could explain the self-care behaviors of patients with HF.

Eliciting social stressors, supports, and determinants of health through the DSM-5 cultural formulation interview.

As recognition of the importance of social determinants of mental health has increased, the limitations of clinical competence-enhancing interventions that do not emphasize this approach have emerged. The Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) is a cultural competence intervention that emerges from a confluence of social medicine and medical anthropology traditions. Limited research has examined how patients respond to CFI questions on social-structural aspects of illness and care to assess whether the CFI adequately elicits information on social determinants of mental health. Patients' responses during a first intake appointment to three CFI questions on social stressors, supports, or barriers to care from 27 patient-clinician dyads are analyzed through qualitative content analysis. The data come from a hyper-diverse clinical setting in Queens, New York, where no ethnoracial group has a majority and all patient-clinician dyads reflect cross-cultural interactions. At least one social determinant was coded in 89 of all cases, and nearly 44% included themes related to multiple determinants of health. The most-commonly coded theme was social relationships (n = 21), followed by financial instability (n = 7), stigma (n = 5), housing instability (n = 2), and poor access to healthcare, involvement in the criminal justice system, employment instability, area-level poverty, and immigration policies (n = 1 each). Our work shows that social determinants of mental health can be elicited through the CFI. Future work should examine how this information is included in clinicians' formulations and whether the cultural formulation approach would benefit from additional revision to facilitate assessment of socio-structural factors.

Using a tele-behavioral health rapid intake model to address high demand for psychotherapy at an academic medical center during COVID-19.

Long wait times for mental health appointments have been a chronic dilemma for academic medical centers. This problem intensified worldwide with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Approximately 70% of mental health services experienced pandemic-related disruption in care provision, while simultaneously experiencing a substantial increase in patient demand. Wait times for mental health appointments also increased, varying across populations from 3 to 18 months. As prolonged wait time is positively associated with severity of psychiatric symptoms and negative outcomes, the authors implemented a novel rapid intake telemedicine clinic model to shorten wait time and increase patient access to psychological care at an academic medical center. To address an overwhelming influx of mental health referrals and a growing wait-time-until-first appointment at an academic medical center serving as a lone safety net hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic, a 5-provider Psychology Rapid Intake Team was established using a hybrid of telehealth and in-person appointments based on patient preference. Data on new patient volumes, wait time for 1st appointment, and wait time to begin therapeutic intervention were compared during the same calendar 3-month period immediately prior to and following implementation of the rapid intake clinic. A paired-samples t-test was conducted to compare new patient volumes pre- vs. post- intervention. Results revealed a significant increase in the number of new patients the providers were able to accommodate in the post-implementation (M = 62.00, SD = 7.21) compared to the pre-implementation (M = 31.00, SD = 2.61) condition; t(2) = -8.60, p < 0.05. There was a significant decrease in the average wait times for 1st appointment post-implementation (M = 24.99, SD = 2.38) compared to the pre-implementation (M = 37.32, SD = 1.47) condition; t(2) = 5.56, p < 0.05. In addition, days to begin therapeutic intervention decreased dramatically (394%) from the pre- (M = 142.50) to post-implementation (M = 28.84) period. The COVID-19 pandemic strained a mental healthcare system which led to increasingly long wait times for intake appointments and delayed psychotherapy interventions. The Psychology Rapid Intake Team initiative served to improve access, reduce patient risk related to prolonged wait times, and accelerated patient engagement with psychotherapy services. The model can serve as a unique, sustainable infrastructure for behavioral health delivery for low acuity mental health problems in large health care systems.

A Mixed-methods Evaluation of an Addiction/Cardiology Pilot Clinic With Contingency Management for Patients With Stimulant-associated Cardiomyopathy.

Contingency management (CM) is one of the most effective treatments for stimulant use disorder but has not been leveraged for people with stimulant-associated cardiomyopathy (SA-CMP), a chronic health condition with significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a multidisciplinary addiction/cardiology clinic with CM for patients with SA-CMP and to explore barriers and facilitators to engagement and recovery. We recruited patients with a hospitalization in the past 6 months, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) and stimulant use disorder to participate in Heart Plus, a 12-week addiction/cardiology clinic with CM in an urban, safety-net, hospital-based cardiology clinic, which took place March 2021 through June 2021. Contingency management entailed gift card rewards for attendance and negative point-of-care urine drug screens. Our mixed-methods study used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. We obtained data from the medical record, staff surveys, and qualitative interviews with participants. Thirty-eight patients were referred, 17 scheduled an appointment, and 12 attended the intake appointment and enrolled in the study. Mean treatment duration was 8 of 12 weeks. Of the 9 participants who attended more than one visit, the median attendance was 82% of available visits for in-person visits and 83% for telephone visits, and all patients reported decreased stimulant use. Delivering CM through a multidisciplinary addiction/cardiology clinic for patients with SA-CMP was feasible and engaged patients in care. Further research is needed to assess whether this program is associated with improved heart failure outcomes.

Dysphagia Evaluation in a Multidisciplinary VA Cognitive Care Clinic.

The VA Cognitive Care Clinic (CCC) provides comprehensive evaluation and longitudinal treatment for older Veterans with neurocognitive disorders and their caregivers through multidisciplinary care including geriatrics, palliative medicine, neuropsychology, and social work. Speech-language pathology (SLP) was recently incorporated into the CCC team in response to calls for more proactive approaches to diagnosis and management of dysphagia (swallowing dysfunction) in persons with dementia. While dysphagia is estimated to be highly prevalent in this population, prior work has been limited by inadequate dementia characterization. The purpose of this novel quality improvement project was to provide descriptive information regarding the occurrence of dysphagia in persons with dementia seen in CCC. CCC patients underwent comprehensive neuropsychological and geriatrics assessments that led to a multidisciplinary determination of dementia diagnosis and subtype. Validated dysphagia-specific clinical evaluation tools included the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10; dysphagia-specific patient-reported outcome measure), the 3-ounce water swallow test to assess swallowing safety (aspiration risk), and the Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS) to assess swallowing efficiency. A REDCap database was constructed to track CCC evaluation results and patient-specific variables derived from the electronic health record. Descriptive statistics were calculated for dementia diagnosis, subtype, and dysphagia measures. 124 patients were seen in CCC between 2017 and 2021. Eighty-eight patients (73%) received a dementia diagnosis with the majority meeting criteria for Alzheimer's disease (53%) or mixed etiology (24%). Sixty-eight (55%) of these patients were evaluated by an SLP during their initial intake appointment. Twenty of 59 patients (39%) scored 3 or higher on the EAT-10, indicating concern for dysphagia. Twenty-six of 64 patients (41%) failed the 3-ounce water swallow test. Thirty-one of 62 patients (50%) demonstrated inefficient mastication based on length of total masticatory time on the TOMASS. Findings from this initial cohort indicate that approximately one-half of patients with dementia assessed by a SLP demonstrated clinical signs of swallowing safety or efficiency impairment. Patient report of dysphagia-related symptoms occurred at a significantly lower rate, supporting the need for SLP services in multidisciplinary memory and geriatrics clinics to facilitate early identification of dysphagia and avoid serious dysphagia-related consequences, including pneumonia and malnutrition.

The unheard victims: Challenges of identifying experiences of trauma among children with ASD

Trigger warning: Sexual assault. Several years ago, I was providing individual psychotherapy to a kind, intelligent woman in her 40's who was in the process of obtaining an advanced scientific degree in a very competitive university program. She received a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) as an adult and was seeking psychotherapy to improve her social skills in hopes of better maintaining personal relationships in both her personal and professional life. Approximately 3 months into therapy, we were exploring common challenges she faces in maintaining positive relationships with fellow graduate students and work colleagues. She casually described an event from a few years ago, during which she was forced to engage in non‐consensual sex with a male colleague in her workplace bathroom. While she seemed distressed in telling her story, she did not appear to understand the gravity of what she was describing. “I didn't like it,” she stated. “That was a bad day at work.” When asked why she didn't mention this in therapy before (she denied any “traumatic or stressful life experiences” during her intake appointment), she stated, “I've never told anyone. Was I supposed to? I don't really know what's ‘normal’, especially with the opposite sex. It made me uncomfortable, but lots of things make me uncomfortable that everyone just tells me to get over. Did I do something wrong?”

Patients’ Reasons for “No Shows” and Premature Termination of Treatment at an Outpatient Mental Health Program

One in five Canadians currently experience mental health problems, and although effective psychotherapy treatment is currently available, patients’ decision to end therapy before completing treatment impacts limited resources. This qualitative study explored the experiences of 15 patients who either did not attend a scheduled intake appointment or had dropped out of service prematurely from an outpatient mental health clinic. Overall, the overarching themes identified were overall experience with service and access, multiple factors and external circumstances, experience with group structure, group processes and interactions, and age-related differences. Younger participants shared a need for flexible and spontaneous service.

A virtual, pilot randomized trial of a brief intervention to prevent suicide in an integrated healthcare setting

ObjectivePatients who die by suicide are often seen in primary care settings in the weeks leading to their death. There has been little study of brief interventions to prevent suicide in these settings. MethodWe conducted a virtual, pilot, randomized controlled trial of a brief suicide prevention strategy called Veterans Affairs Brief Intervention and Contact Program (VA BIC) in patients who presented to a primary care mental health walk-in clinic for a new mental health intake appointment and were at risk for suicide. Our primary aim was to assess feasibility. We measured our ability to recruit 20 patients. We measured the proportion of enrolled patients who completed all study assessments. We assessed adherence among patients assigned to VA BIC. ResultsTwenty patients were enrolled and 95% (N = 19) completed all study assessments. Among the 10 patients assigned to VA BIC, 90% (N = 9) of patients completed all required intervention visits, and 100% (N = 10) completed ≥70% of the required interventions visits. ConclusionIt is feasible to conduct a virtual trial of VA BIC in an integrated care setting. Future research should clarify the role of VA BIC as a suicide prevention strategy in integrated care settings using an adequately powered design.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04054947.

Utilizing Telemedicine and Modified Fibrosis Staging Protocols to Maintain Treatment Initiation and Adherence Among Hepatitis C Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the decline in Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) screening and treatment globally in part due to lockdowns and restrictions at healthcare centers. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the effectiveness of an updated workflow implemented at Boston Medical Center (BMC) HCV clinics. Revised workflow incorporated appointments via telemedicine, transitioning to blood test-based fibrosis scoring, and delivering medication by mail to mitigate the lack of in-person services. We compared 2 cohorts of patients who attended at least the initial intake appointment at BMCHCV clinics: 170 before the pandemic and 133 after the pandemic. Outcome variables included treatment starts, fibrosis lab tests completed, appointment attendance, and SVR achievement. Proportions for outcome variables were compared between groups by use of χ2 and 2-sample t-tests where appropriate. Our results showed a 14.43% decrease in completing fibrosis scoring tests (P-value: <.001) and a 15.21% decrease in medication initiation (P-value: <.001) among the patients who initiated care during the pandemic (modified workflow group). Furthermore, we found a 18.56% decrease in sustained virologic response (SVR) among the modified workflow group when compared to the controls. Overall, these results align with current trends of patients’ decreasing engagement in HCV care but show higher retention than other published data. Furthermore, these figures support how appointments via telemedicine, transitioning to blood test-based fibrosis scoring, and medication delivery by mail can serve as tools to increase access to HCV care and successful HCV treatment completion even after COVID restrictions are lifted.

Uptake and effectiveness of a self-guided mobile app platform for college student mental health

BackgroundCollege students endorse high rates of mental health problems. While many colleges offer on-campus services, many students who could benefit from mental health services do not receive care. Indeed, nearly half of students who screen positive for depression, for example, do not receive treatment. Digital mental health programs, such as those delivered via mobile apps, may help expand access to mental health care and resources. This mixed-methods study aims to examine the uptake and effectiveness of an implementation of IntelliCare for College Students, a self-guided app-based mental health platform, on two university campuses. MethodsData on counseling center utilization was collected prior to the implementation of the app (pre-implementation phase) and while the app was available on campus (implementation phase). Data on app usage was collected throughout the implementation phase. A subset of participants (n = 20), along with counseling center staff members (n = 10), completed feedback interviews. ResultsOverall, uptake of the app platform was low. A total of 117 participants downloaded the app and registered their study ID during the implementation phase. Approximately 24% (28/117) of participants used the app only once. The number of days between the first and last day of app use ranged from 0 to 299, with a mean of 35.01 days and a median of 14 days. A relatively small portion of the sample (26.5%; 31/117) downloaded one or more of the IntelliCare interactive apps. In examining counseling center utilization, there were no significant changes in intake appointments, individual therapy sessions, or crisis appointments observed from the pre-implementation phase to the implementation phase of the study. Feedback interviews highlighted the significant level of disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and shift to remote learning, including challenges disseminating information to students and a preference to spend less time with digital devices outside of class time. ConclusionsFindings from this study indicate that there is an ongoing need to identify ways to reach college students and support student mental health and wellness for the remainder of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Identifying factors affecting diabetes education program participation within a metro Detroit integrated health system

Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) can help people achieve optimal disease control, yet these services often remain underutilized. People referred to these programs by their provider can become disengaged in the program at several key steps. This study applies Classification and Regression Tree analysis to 3796 people with diabetes at a single health system based in the Detroit metropolitan area who were referred for DSMES provided by the health system to determine demographic patterns of those who were successfully contacted to schedule program intake appointments, those who did not attend their intake appointment, and those who began but did not complete their personalized DSMES program. White people > 43 years of age, those with a prior A1C value > 8.9 and those with Medicaid insurance had the highest rate of not being successfully contacted for their intake appointment. Those who did not attend their intake appointment tended to have Medicaid insurance, be younger than 48 years, and have A1C > 8.1. Within the Medicare or private insurance groups, those who did not attend were more likely to be female, of Black race and not partnered. Older males with a lower A1C (≤8.3%) had the lowest rate (34.0%) of failing to complete their DSMES plan. The data showed that almost half of those referred were not successfully contacted. The overall low completion rate of 13.2% confirms the need to examine factors predictive of participation and completion. This study highlights process improvement changes to improve personalization of outreach and engagement.

Universal screening for substance use by Peer Support Specialists in the Emergency Department is a pathway to buprenorphine treatment

IntroductionEvidence suggests emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine as efficacious in connecting ED patients to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) utilizing peer support specialists (PSS). However, there are no reports of implementation of ED-initiated buprenorphine in practice. Such information is crucial to support the adoption of ED-initiated buprenorphine. MethodsIn this quality improvement pilot study, a PSS screened ED patients over age 18 with the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use – 1 (TAPS-1). The PSS considered the patient a positive screen if the patient met the following criteria: risky weekly alcohol use, illicit drugs, or prescription drugs. For patients who screened positive, the PSS delivered a brief intervention and assessed interest in treatment. An ED clinician assessed patients who screened positive for heroin/opioid use and were interested in treatment for buprenorphine induction. ResultsFrom January through June 2019, 1037 patients were screened for risky substance use, and, of these, 238 (23%) screened positive. The distribution of primary substance used was: 51% alcohol, 26% cannabis, 7.5% cocaine, 7.5% heroin, and 3.3% prescription opioids. Of the 23 patients who screened positive for heroin/opioid use and requested treatment, seven were admitted to the hospital. Of the remaining 16 patients, 14 patients wanted buprenorphine treatment, seven were provided buprenorphine in the ED, and four of these attended their intake appointments for community-based MOUD treatment. ConclusionED-initiated buprenorphine facilitated by a PSS is feasible and requires coordination and planning. Approaches to ED-initiated buprenorphine that screen only for opioid use will miss many patients interested in substance use treatment.11This work was supported by North Carolina Department of Human Health Services, Division of Public Health, Injury and Violence Prevention Branch.